Five Cutting Edge US Weapons Set To Be Deployed in 2024

Рет қаралды 50,974

Күн бұрын

The United States, as the top global military power, understands the importance of military strength in safeguarding national security and stability. With an extensive arsenal of weapons and military equipment, the U.S. continuously improves and updates its military capabilities each year. In 2024, a number of cutting-edge U.S. weapons are scheduled to be deployed. In this video, we will showcase the five advanced U.S. weapons expected to be in service by 2024. Curious to know which weapons made the list? Keep watching to discover!
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv

Пікірлер: 168

@CMark89 2 ай бұрын

I hope Boeing's military sector is a lot better than their commercial sector. Otherwise....

@MetaView7 2 ай бұрын

I have my suspicion. Why else would they need to shut the mouth of that guy?

@SnowTiger45 2 ай бұрын

They have already made a TON from military R & D funds from the US Government Contracts etc. If it weren't for that, Boeing would have likely closed its doors years ago.

@brianboye8025 2 ай бұрын

Boeing has been losing money on DOD contracts lately. That is really difficult.

@philchristmas4071 Ай бұрын

So proud to be an American! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

@jehizkiaveenhuizen2790 2 ай бұрын

I believe missiles will be most decisive in a future wars. So i go for the PRSM as most impressive development. But it also depends on capabilities you did not mention. For example is the missile resistant to counter measures the enemy can use. Like jamming GPRS signal or shoot the missile down. How fast is the missile and is it able to change its flight path to be unpredictable. What are the cost per missile. In short " is the missile Future proof"...

@stuffstoconsider3516 2 ай бұрын

Pentagon is learning a lot from the war in Ukraine for sure.

@tshavfengvang7831 Ай бұрын

I can assure you Lockheed Martin has these secrets but they're sealed by the Pentagon. Also, what we're receiving in from this platform are just general information. No one's being an idiot here.

@valkry007 2 ай бұрын

Zumwalt's - DUDS !

@kingb3 2 ай бұрын

Can the US get a weapon that takes out that massive debt? otherwise this just amounts to hopes and dreams if we cant afford these.

@myplane150 Ай бұрын

Just so you know: The Block70/72 Viper had a service life of 12,000 hours (as mentioned) but the F-15EX has a service life of 20,000 hours.

@fraudulenteel 2 ай бұрын

It will be interesting to see how ww3 plays out with the weapons advancements since ww2

@katyushatman5187 2 ай бұрын

it dont matter how advanced and modern a weapon is if its too expensive to mass produce

@RimfireAddicted70 2 ай бұрын

I'll be surprised if the destroyer is in service for more than 5 yrs. Those hulls are having real structural failure problems, and the modular design payload has all but already been abandoned by the Navy. They cancelled the gun almost 1-2yrs back as the per shell cost went beyond reason so the gun which was to be a crucial weapon is now something they want deleted altogether. The whole class of them is an financial disaster and they are struggling to figure out how to use them without just scrapping them. Sad really but technology is advancing so fast builders are not able to keep up with changes and still be profitable.

@bt7528 28 күн бұрын

Think it had opposite problem. They assumed lasers and railguns would be ready. Also assumed the ammo for main guns would be adopted elsewhere to reduce price

@junresitoo4718 2 ай бұрын

Very advanced that those equipments won't work in the battle field especially when the opponent is a strong country.

@reginaldlagrone5082 2 ай бұрын

The U.S. military already have these systems in services. At some point we have to get unstuck from the 1990's.

@faruksmajlovic1689 2 ай бұрын

koristila ih je '90.tih🎉

@okolona1 2 ай бұрын

All that money and we cant even control our southern border

@happyhammer1 2 ай бұрын

Yeah it's infuriating. We can spend untold billions on military equipment to protect other countries but our border is wide open. We don't live in a serious country. It's a shopping mall filled with economic units.

@bt7528 28 күн бұрын

Bro some people come here to escape the constant political infighting. Give it a break bro.

@okolona1 28 күн бұрын

@@bt7528 Fools can come and go whenever they feel like it for any reason.

@mth469 10 күн бұрын

Apply a stealth coating and it will give it all of the good features of a 5th gen aircraft without the many downsides of a 5th gen aircraft.

@jian-pingshen4001 2 ай бұрын

From the comments, it seems the US weapons are not as impressive as before, I meant before the Russia-Ukraine war. Those west weapons might be over inflated in terms of cost-effectiveness.

@tomdarco2223 2 ай бұрын

Right On Go Army!

@user-oy5mm3pb2g 2 ай бұрын

So they claimed until the Iranian captured their top drone with ease. We saw over 10 US's hyped game changer machines and ammo made useless in Ukraine.

@Raivo_K 2 ай бұрын

Which ones were made useless? HIMARS proved very effective and still is to this day. Abrams has little impact with only 31 provided tanks but it does keep the crew alive when it's targeted. Javelin has been and continues to be nightmare for every russian tank crew. Bardley despite it's age has been able to go toe to toe with russias best tanks and win while keeping it's crew alive when targeted. The only one i would call outright useless are the various Switchblade drones that have not performed well.

@Givemeproofkid 2 ай бұрын

@@Raivo_Kmore tears

@pandibbarman 2 ай бұрын

Don't like the facts? @@Givemeproofkid

@layneparker7408 Ай бұрын

The fact Russia "the most powerful military in the world" cant capture Ukraine just shows you how pathetic Russia is 😂@Givemeproofkid

@JoseLopez-mc7kw 2 ай бұрын

Propellers that spin through jet-engine on sides of wings small about the size of the warthog another great vehicle

@Marcellogo 2 ай бұрын

So. you are talking a new version of planes first consigned (F-16 is NOT for USA!) in 1976, another large recon drone, a single ship ( the last of a series of three, instead of the tens of them planned...). The new rocket is interesting and useful instead, so one of five being not just a stopgap patch is actually good. So, no news about the T-7 or the increment three for F-35?

@wakh-vw2gh 2 ай бұрын

Did he says Stability😂😂😂😂😂

@JoseLopez-mc7kw 2 ай бұрын

Prsm wings with transforming propellers

@hirdleyreid5796 2 ай бұрын

What military strength your talking about

@eohq 2 ай бұрын

The one where 4 (including the best) of the world’s top 5 air forces are US branches and somewhere among them is the russian air force

@dingodog5677 2 ай бұрын

lol, bringing back the f15 and f16😂🤣😂, what happened to sixth gen fighters?

@antoniochalking 2 ай бұрын

They are being worked on still

@BilalKhan-yg9jc 2 ай бұрын

I'm not surprised. The F-16 is a very reliable platform along with being fast and agile. I first saw the new version, when they were offered to India. The thing is if you update the radar and fit them with long range missles, they'll still make mince meat of 5th 6th Gen fighters. They've added extra fuel tanks to increase its range. This is a common theme among Air Forces. The older reliable and cheap to maintain platforms are being fitted with modern tech. The PAF is still using Mirage 2000s with advanced avionics, radar and missles. They're the ones that have recently been used in operations against India, Iran and Afghanistan.

@dingodog5677 2 ай бұрын

@@BilalKhan-yg9jc it is a great plane and ur right. Older platforms are showing their worth. But still?

@aidanmacdougall9250 2 ай бұрын

They're junk 😂

@antoniochalking 2 ай бұрын

@@aidanmacdougall9250 no, they aren’t, they are a wip and won’t be in service for a little while, but what is your proof that they will be “junk”💀

@dingodog5677 2 ай бұрын

And the new destroyer is pointless in the age of precision missiles. Looks like tech from the last century.😂🤣😂🤣

@Eshrakgaming934 2 ай бұрын

If you dont have the platforms how do you able to fire the missile??

@dingodog5677 2 ай бұрын

@@Eshrakgaming934 from the shore. Big blue water navies don’t really have a place, except for those intending to invade other nations e.g. the US. They won’t be able to approach a coastline without being destroyed.

@Eshrakgaming934 2 ай бұрын

@@dingodog5677 Yeah thats why we are world most dangerous villain👽👽save yourself

@dingodog5677 2 ай бұрын

@@Eshrakgaming934 you’re right but I’ll sit here waiting.🍺

@eohq 2 ай бұрын

If any carrier capable country wanted to attack somewhere far away from itself, it would either use its foreign bases or a carrier strike group. And guess what it consist of.

@MacDonaldkachala-cm5gc 2 ай бұрын

We are now exhausted with these U.S. made weapons, they are just more advanced on CNN and BBC not on the ground😭😭

@pandibbarman 2 ай бұрын

Lol just like Russian equipments only advance in Russian State TV 😱. What they claimed? The impenetrable umbrella of s400 will now protect crimea, one week later black Sea headquarter gets hit by decades old cruise missiles ☠️

@Grobiou 2 ай бұрын

Dudo que los laser sean efectivos contra misiles hipersonicos. Un arma láser necesita mucha energía para destruir un misil. Aún más energía si el misil viaja a 2000 m/s debido a que tendrá menos tiempo para dañar su estructura. Los láser tambien pierden su efectividad según aumenta la distancia al objetivo y el clima. Por la fricción que debe soportar un misil hipersonico se tiene que construir con capacidad de soportar temperaturas muy altas.

@JoseLopez-mc7kw 2 ай бұрын

ISs in zero ome for eagles and communications link processing missiles for both f-block and eagles

@abbbb5625 2 ай бұрын

An F15 Eagle 2 costs a little bit less than 100 Mio, a PRSM is 2 Mio a piece from a HIMARS launcher at a speed of 300Km/h (easy target for any S300 and above), a mojave cost 1.5 mio (Russia proved these area good target for their Sukhoi - a cat and mouse game when a flyby is enough to make inoperable) - very lethal against civilian targets. The destroyer is roughly 2 bio a piece. My question is simple: how can USA afford this on tax payers based on a service economy which is not producing anything else but weapon and is in decline? Financially the deb is catching up and the economy is dying (if not already dead) - F15, you need 300 to 500 as the US is widely spread - the PRSM, at least 4,000 as deterrent but in case of conflict, you will soon need a production of at least 1000/month can the industry fill the demand? - the drone is very dangerous for civilian population and goat herders but will become meaningless against any conventional military forces except maybe in swarms (= you will lose them all but got the target) and the zumwalt-class is a bottomless pit of top technology but still weak against and subs or coastal defenses swarms. These weapons are more to be used as deterrence (against civilians and goat herders) but will have no practical impact on a conventional military conflict.

@dingodog5677 2 ай бұрын

The US big drones are outdated. They can easily be taken out. Look at Russia and irans drone tech. Smaller with similar capabilities.

@jacobnavarre4482 2 ай бұрын

They have less range and most of them don't carry the same amount of payload, so no thanks

@darkopavlic6592 2 ай бұрын

@@jacobnavarre4482 totaly fake data. geranium is far more advance

@TeguhSantosot_so 2 ай бұрын

Okay some new and sum upgraded

@JoseLopez-mc7kw 2 ай бұрын

Eagle and f-block

@Booozy3050 2 ай бұрын

Just send the prototypes to Ukraine so we can see them fail in "Real World Trials" and maybe save some money.

@antoniochalking 2 ай бұрын

You realize all we have sent is our weapons from like before 2004, none of are most advanced stuff is out there, like the long range missiles or tanks

@eugenefleming1614 2 ай бұрын

The drone looks impressive

@adamnordinrogers Ай бұрын

Mojave PSM ARE GREAT DEBUT

@tmafungo84 Ай бұрын

With fancy names like "Hellfire, Harpoon, Javelin", and an assortment of fancy acronyms like "MLRS, ATACMS, HIMARS, MOAB" etc. Every single one of them a certified "Game-Changer"😅. No arsenal has been more overhyped in modern combat history 😂

@SKumar-rb1tz 2 ай бұрын

To prove its efficiency , sent them to ukraine .

@Raivo_K 2 ай бұрын

Indeed. PRSM could be sent right now as Ukraine already has the launchers. It's more complicated with the others.

@albrightomar5892 2 ай бұрын

They can't they know what will be the outcome

@darkopavlic6592 2 ай бұрын

just like abrams. hahahaha. old junk fertilise ukro fields

@andrejrockshox Ай бұрын

f-15s to protect f-35s LOL

@APOLON-bm7ym 2 ай бұрын

So strange, that after all those stealth aircrafts, US decided to build F15 and F16 vol.2. Dont even think its f15 and f16. They have AESA radar, much more powerfull engines, EW... Sending THOSE to Ukraine would...but no way.

@miamikhan-oz3kq Ай бұрын

inspite of state of art technology us cant overpower taliban

@neocon6662 2 ай бұрын

DDG-1002, not even a gun on deck? What?

@kalles.2083 2 ай бұрын

What do you think is on the front deck? A bit disguised but... 😅

@LSmoney215 Ай бұрын

Yes it does. It’s a stealth ship so it’s hidden inside a bay

@gulparviz 2 ай бұрын

5 pocket cutting, budget fu[|

@jeffi854 Ай бұрын

I wanna know how our countries going to be able to afford all these missiles and missile technology and radars ? Seriously, how’s our military going to afford the cost of paying for a fleet of B21 Bombers and the NGAD fighter’s when every three months they’re telling the American people they don’t have enough money to afford to keep our country up and running and they’re gonna have to shut down our government ? Especially at a time we’re sending Ukraine hundreds of millions of dollars and facing the very real possibility of going to war with Russia, China and Iran simultaneously !

@vevenaneathna 2 ай бұрын

why do you sound like some AI chat gpt channel made by bangladesh gold farmers?

@miamikhan-oz3kq Ай бұрын

it is concocted story not war proven

@russellvonastel7111 2 ай бұрын

Give them to Ukraine

@darkopavlic6592 2 ай бұрын

and museum in moscow

@tshavfengvang7831 Ай бұрын

The US does not. I repeat "Does not" give out information that would jeopardize its national security. This video is mainly to present a view or gain viewers.

@suffiankhan5776 2 ай бұрын

I Love Putin ❤

@eohq 2 ай бұрын

Please keep your disabilities to yourself

@philchristmas4071 Ай бұрын

He has an international warrant for his arrest. He's a fugitive for kidnapping children. Not to mention all of the war crimes he will face.

@rodrigoquiroga8590 2 ай бұрын

Nothing new, just upgraded old weapons...

@tomascastillo4676 2 ай бұрын

That Zumwalt Vessels are horrible and very useless. An absolute failure. They Even rust immediately over the entire Hull.

@derekebesujr9311 2 ай бұрын

The world no longer has fear of all this overpriced equipment.

@Genehicks199 2 ай бұрын

Crap!!! The comment section is just full of trolls.

@LisandraBiazusLupatini 2 ай бұрын

Save Russian people. japanese. Chinese.

@suffiankhan5776 2 ай бұрын

❤ Putin

@AbdulRazzaq-vr1pm 2 ай бұрын

Rate is 1usd per min

@goodik4885 2 ай бұрын

U.S.-💪

@olderchin1558 2 ай бұрын

Nothing new. Just a rehatch of old news. It appears that the US weapon tech has stagnated.

@crazygame2724 2 ай бұрын

Does that mean the F35 can't survive a dogfight with a SU-35 or SU-57?

@eohq 2 ай бұрын

In what situation would it get into a dogfight? Even if it did: it can, aim-9x sidewinder launch doesn’t require the F35 to directly face the enemy. It’s simple, there isnt anything more advanced than the lightning

@ryszardfalkowski7917 28 күн бұрын

Dogfight? You're thinking Pre 1990s technology.

@UnitedUA 2 ай бұрын

Russia just can't compete! 😁

@darkopavlic6592 2 ай бұрын

whit this junk you mean

@UnitedUA 2 ай бұрын

@@darkopavlic6592 Russia is far outclassed by both NATO and China. Anyone with a brain can see it easy as fuck.

@doctorjivago5081 2 ай бұрын

Come to Russia to see how ridiculous these weapons are...

@eohq 2 ай бұрын

What?

@pierrechampagne 2 ай бұрын

I though that it's all SHIT!

@TRD-JDM Ай бұрын

High tech junk

@Dirtdabber1972 2 ай бұрын

Propaganda

@zakat900b 2 ай бұрын

US PROPAGANDA TILL IT FACE A REAL THREAT FROM A SUPER POWER

@EC-cm8sf 2 ай бұрын

Except we know how 20 year old US weapons do against a “super power” in Ukraine.

@jeromebahala6360 2 ай бұрын

exactly 😂

@TravisStockton 2 ай бұрын

oh yeah because the US has never faced a super power (#2) before

@drgonzo305 2 ай бұрын

There is no other superpower, Russia can’t even take the poorest country in Europe and has lost more men and equipment trying than America has lost in every single conflict and war it’s been in since the end of WW2 combined😂😂. I would struggle to call Russia even a regional power anymore and China’s a joke whose last war was 40 years ago against Vietnam and they got slaughtered. The only chance of the U.S. facing off against a Superpower is if we have a civil war. The U.S. navy is attacked with the best ballistic and cruise missiles Iran can build from Russian designs, plus sea drones, shaheeed drones & U.S. underwater drones and not 1 U.S. warship is scratched. Russia has to deal with just sea drones and an occasional subsonic cruise missile and Russia has lost 30%+ of their Black Sea fleet(flagship included😂😂😂). They are not on the same level

@DZimmer000 2 ай бұрын

What Super Power would the US face? Russia? They can’t even beat a third rate Ukrainian Military. China? Their third rate military can’t even take Taiwan. So unless you’re talking about an Alien Military….There is no real threat from another “Super Power”

@7subba 2 ай бұрын

USA is not number one in military technologies and commercial technologies, now china is the number one both of these technologies, and most of the people of the world know that 100% clearly and for military technologies and aerospace technologies Russia is number 2 and USA is number 3 in in power rank.

@Genehicks199 2 ай бұрын

@7subba: Question for you. How much do you get paid to troll? Do you get benefits? I am just curious.

@wuppas 2 ай бұрын

@@Genehicks199 Talking about trolls, you can't stand the truth, that the US marketing is all hype.

@Genehicks199 2 ай бұрын

@@wuppas They have a saying in America, Fuck Around And Find Out. The U.S.G. has not turned the dogs loose in 80 yrs. If they ever slip their leash any country that fucks with them will regret it.

@LSmoney215 Ай бұрын

Yur ranking don’t equate to real life

@xxxbbbqqq 2 ай бұрын

They're bringing back the F15? The "New" jets must be really bad. Wow.

@johnpage7491 2 ай бұрын

They will be used primarily as missile trucks in conjunction with the F-35. The "35" will do the bulk of the targeting and the "15" will provide the missiles. It's actually a brilliant plan. The F15EX will also be capable of air to ail missions among others. ( The plane too good to retire!!! )

@quadro1337 2 ай бұрын

A true 5/6th (su57 is not a 5th gen fighter due to bad engines) fighters are really expensive and not a lot of countries can afford to buy them not even talking about producing them and f15ex now is probably the best air superiority fighter in world.

@LSmoney215 Ай бұрын

Every mission don’t require stealth and f15 is the best fighter in the world that is combat tested

@AbdulRazzaq-vr1pm 2 ай бұрын

Rate is 1usd per min

@AbdulRazzaq-vr1pm 2 ай бұрын

Rate is 1usd per min

@AbdulRazzaq-vr1pm 2 ай бұрын

Rate is 1usd per min