Ford vs Chevy MPG Verdict! Here’s How the F-250 7.3L V8 Compares to the Silverado V8 Towing & Not!

  Рет қаралды 478,054

The Fast Lane Truck

The Fast Lane Truck

Күн бұрын

( www.Transwest.com/frederick ) Ford vs Chevy MPG Verdict! Here Is How the F-250 7.3L V8 Compares to the Silverado HD 6.6L V8 Towing & Not!
Watch a 2020 Ford F-250 7.3L V8 and a 4.30 rear axle on a 800-mile trip:
• I Drove The New 2020 F...
( / tflcar ) Please visit to support TFLcar & TFLtruck.
Check us out on:
Facebook: ( / tfltruck )
Twitter: ( / tfltruck )
The Fast Lane Car: ( / tflcar )
and classic cars as well at:
TFLClassics: ( / classicsunleashed )
#ford #F250 #MPG

Пікірлер: 1 600
@TFLtruck
@TFLtruck 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching! Check out our road trip MPG results with a 4.30 rear differential on TFLnow: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kLWVopRz27e7enU.html and our off-road Tremor gas vs. diesel comparison on TFLoffroad: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q82cl91_z9u7oqs.html
@buildriteconstruction2690
@buildriteconstruction2690 4 жыл бұрын
The Fast Lane Truck Did Ford lower the ride height on the 2020 super duties?
@cody1777
@cody1777 4 жыл бұрын
@@buildriteconstruction2690 yes, I believe I saw that they did. Something like an 1" in the front and 1 1/4" in the back.
@cody1777
@cody1777 4 жыл бұрын
Have you guys ever done a milage test comparing tailgate up versus down? They would be interesting to see in addition to doing that test with a cap also.
@andrewhannah8015
@andrewhannah8015 4 жыл бұрын
cody grillaert MythBusters did the tailgate up or down test. Leave the tailgate up for better mpg
@cody1777
@cody1777 4 жыл бұрын
@@andrewhannah8015 I know they did, I'd like to see TFL do it and introduce a cap to the comparison.
@ctapmgriley
@ctapmgriley 4 жыл бұрын
If port injection is "old school" I guess carbureted is "prehistoric".
@lubesiron-cslfarmsllc2751
@lubesiron-cslfarmsllc2751 4 жыл бұрын
The tech manuals for carburetors are either chiseled in stone tablets or cave paintings. Lol
@foxbodyguyeightyeight3672
@foxbodyguyeightyeight3672 3 жыл бұрын
That's my problem with the people doing these reviews, they judge trucks on things they don't understand they aren't mechanic's or run fleets and look at downtime numbers. They just blurt out things they don't really understand and everyone walks in lock step based off of it.
@Doomzdayxx
@Doomzdayxx 2 жыл бұрын
That's a fair categorization. And throttle body injection would be "ancient"
@jasonguy6572
@jasonguy6572 4 жыл бұрын
When towing. Ford 7.3 = 5.65mpg Chevy 6.5 = 6.9 Unloaded Chevy = 16.0 mpg Ford = 15.1
@HVAC_Jae
@HVAC_Jae 3 жыл бұрын
@Dylan Church Chevy has the new 6.6L gas V8. Add: yes 6.6L not 6.0 or 6.5
@bearatts
@bearatts 4 жыл бұрын
That amazes me, these new heavy-duty trucks get better fuel economy than my 2004 hemi 1500, technology has come a long way in 16 years.
@Rift45
@Rift45 4 жыл бұрын
bearatts Was thinking the same thing! My 2004 Hemi 1500 got 15 empty
@brianhilligoss
@brianhilligoss 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah my 6.2 Silverado gets 14 combined average per tank of mixed use. Best was 18 on the interstate with a good tail wind.
@johncholmes643
@johncholmes643 4 жыл бұрын
Not very hard to beat a Dodge hemi with anything
@Rift45
@Rift45 4 жыл бұрын
My 2015 Hemi on the other hand got 21.5 on a long flat trip at 60-65mph
@kenleycarlton7562
@kenleycarlton7562 4 жыл бұрын
Have the exact same truck. Hemi 04. 240k miles now
@cup_and_cone
@cup_and_cone 4 жыл бұрын
Smaller engine Chevy with less geared six speed still did better, despite a slightly heavier trailer... Now that's impressive.
@brandonhouse9722
@brandonhouse9722 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah I like how he added at the end how the Chevy trailer was heavier.
@matthewrobertson156
@matthewrobertson156 4 жыл бұрын
Based on differential gearing it was able to haul more than this Ford was rated because the Chevy was a 3.73 differential gear versus the Ford 3.55. Don't forget that you're using winter gas and running the heater.
@freedomisntfree_44
@freedomisntfree_44 4 жыл бұрын
Cup & Cone gm is weaker there fore not as much fuel
@aarons3008
@aarons3008 4 жыл бұрын
Also the Chevrolet managed that better mpg despite the fact that they used 85 octane (with 10% ethanol) yet for some reason on the Ford they gave it 87 (without ethanol) even though both manufacturers say 87 minimum. I'd imagine if the Chevrolet had gotten the equal fuel it would have been an even larger margin of difference.
@EricFortuneJr.
@EricFortuneJr. 4 жыл бұрын
Matthew Robertson The heat won’t affect fuel economy unless the defrost is on, fuel type maybe, weather conditions for sure and gearing as well.
@nathankestin1922
@nathankestin1922 4 жыл бұрын
Finally the Embargo is over!! Can't wait to see more videos about this truck! Keep up the consistent hard work TFL!!
@nateyoung6331
@nateyoung6331 4 жыл бұрын
5 star will have their tuned numbers soon.
@TFLtruck
@TFLtruck 4 жыл бұрын
We will publish more Super Duty videos soon.
@hendo337
@hendo337 4 жыл бұрын
@@TFLtruck why did they embargo the 7.3 when it was readily for sale on lots and you bought it yourselves? Just seems like the dinosaur print media or whoever Ford was protecting from being scooped has too much lead time and is just proving why new internet media is eating their lunch.
@marvinnicklas7638
@marvinnicklas7638 4 жыл бұрын
@@TFLtruck when will you post the Ike Gauntlet videos for the f250 7.3?
@franciscoorozco4146
@franciscoorozco4146 4 жыл бұрын
I have always said it, ford’s numbers on paper are always the best, but in real world everything changes
@APGJuggernaut
@APGJuggernaut 4 жыл бұрын
They should've tested these two with the same trailer, on the same day. Guess we'll see how it does on the ike gauntlet.
@samthompson3184
@samthompson3184 4 жыл бұрын
Exactly, this video is utterly pointless if they didn't do it in the same day, same trailer, etc.
@joshuaearnheart2756
@joshuaearnheart2756 4 жыл бұрын
This channel has always been a wee bit biased towards GM. All these comments talking about fuel economy are quite annoying. A Toyota Prius gets better gas mileage than almost anything. But that’s the only thing it does better.
@Bmc1025
@Bmc1025 4 жыл бұрын
I am a diehard GM guy and I agree. I still see the GM doing better MPG but I think it would have been close enough it wouldn't be a selling point.
@APGJuggernaut
@APGJuggernaut 4 жыл бұрын
I do agree that the constant fuel mileage comments can get annoying, especially from private owners that should be fully aware of the cost to operate a full size truck. But given that the 7.3 is intended to be a reliable and economical motor for commercial and fleet operators, grading it heavily on its fuel economy is warranted. I don't think the ratings were terrible given the testing conditions and elevation. But I was expecting it to get a little closer to the Chevys numbers.
@APGJuggernaut
@APGJuggernaut 4 жыл бұрын
@@Bmc1025 Tow rating, at least to me, seem to vary a lot truck to truck even within the same models. I'll say this much, its getting better mileage than the Ecoboost F-150 I used to own. Loved that truck and the power as much as it loved gas
@davidhorne2326
@davidhorne2326 4 жыл бұрын
Both of them get better empty mpg’s than my ‘05 Tundra! But it’s paid for and suits my need.
@tonynw318
@tonynw318 4 жыл бұрын
I was gonna say the same about my 2012 4.6l tundra... I've been getting 13.5mpg
@robertsitch1415
@robertsitch1415 4 жыл бұрын
The gearing on those trucks makes them burn more fuel than you would expect.
@davidhorne2326
@davidhorne2326 4 жыл бұрын
Si Raff I bought the truck new,and was going on the Toyota reliability. And that has proved true. If I had to buy a new truck it would probably be a Toyota. I worked at a local Chevy dealer until just recently, and saw a lot of issues with the new Chevy’s. The more bells and whistles, the more problems.
@shaunbeach9502
@shaunbeach9502 4 жыл бұрын
A 2019 tundra probably won't be able to get any better gas mileage either.
@davidhorne2326
@davidhorne2326 4 жыл бұрын
Shaun Beach that’s true. Toyota needs to get the mpg’s up.
@SurelyYewJest
@SurelyYewJest 4 жыл бұрын
Wow. Didn't expect that outcome. Obviously they can't really match the rear gearing between the 2 brands, but 15.1 out of the Ford on the new 10-speed versus 16.0 out of the Chevy on the old 6-speed. That's an impressive finish for Chevy's new 6.6.
@Thirty-OughtSick
@Thirty-OughtSick Жыл бұрын
I mean the 350 has a 3.73
@josephfarrah579
@josephfarrah579 4 жыл бұрын
Love Ford bringing big displacement back but I'm with Andre on this one, I expected better.
@tomorr152
@tomorr152 4 жыл бұрын
Nice video guys. One thing I notice when checking gas mileage on my vehicles over the years, is that ambient temperature and wind can make a huge difference. My driving usually takes through Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee so I often see major temperature swings. As the temp goes down so does my mileage. I would really like to see the F-250 test on a warmer day. Enjoy your videos and commentary.
@1134EMP
@1134EMP 4 жыл бұрын
Not bad, 20 years ago, I used to have a 97 4x4 f250 with the 7.5L, a 5 speed manual and 3.55 gears. Best mpg I ever got was 13.5. This was with 285/75r16 tires. Most of the time 11-12mpg. That engine was rated 245hp and 410tq. So now we get more power and better economy.
@kinguin7
@kinguin7 Жыл бұрын
I've got one with 4.10 gears, 5 speed, stock tire size and it's getting between 10 and 12 usually...
@JHuffPhoto
@JHuffPhoto 4 жыл бұрын
Interesting result. The result is consistent with what I would expect. Chevy does a very good job of squeezing efficiency out of their vehicles. However, I would not let a relatively small (really within the margin of error) difference in fuel economy be the deciding factor between these two trucks. There are many other considerations in my opinion. Either vehicle would be a good choice and I think that personal preference in styling and design will likely be big factors in peoples purchasing choices.
@nilsjohansson9739
@nilsjohansson9739 4 жыл бұрын
The 7.3 is kind of falling short in every category for me. Less torque than I expected, less fuel efficientcy than I expected so far. The Chevy is actually doing quite well considering its using a 6 speed.
@kennethbranscum2738
@kennethbranscum2738 4 жыл бұрын
I agree. I was hoping the MPG would be a little better with a 10 speed.
@gen-x-zeke8446
@gen-x-zeke8446 4 жыл бұрын
Do you realize that they did that to get an "out-of-the gate" number, right? People are going to be modifying the heck out of these monsters anyway. I am rare, I love Ford and Chevy and I feel like they make each other greater. I am more of a Ford dude, but I am impressed with RAM's 6.4 HEMI as well. What a trio, 6.4, 6.6, 7.3 like the good old days of big power.
@JsGarage
@JsGarage 4 жыл бұрын
Christopher Williams 6.4 Hemi is much more appealing with its new 8 speed. The old 66RFE held it back quite a bit not even having a true 6 speed ratio spread.
@acdii
@acdii 4 жыл бұрын
They tested the Tremor on the Dyno, not a good choice for a true dyno test. They would have been better off testing the one in this video on the dyno. The 10 speed is better suited to the 3.55 gearing than the 4.10 or whatever it was on the Tremor. When you look at the dyno on the 6.7 with the 10 speed and 3.55 gears the numbers were off the chart.
@bryane2857
@bryane2857 4 жыл бұрын
@@jamespenner1412 In nearly all the Ikes the Chevy out performs in the HD .
@ricwestdoesitwork
@ricwestdoesitwork 4 жыл бұрын
Glad to see you are finally able to do mileage for the 7.3. Not real bad mileage for that big monster of an engine. Thanks for sharing Andre and Kent enjoyed the review.
@marvinsauer8493
@marvinsauer8493 3 жыл бұрын
It is pretty tough to split mpg tests over several days. Each leg of tests, on both trucks, should be done under near identical ambient conditions, meaning that each leg should be performed at nearly same time on same day. Temperature, atmospheric pressure, humidity, wind and fuel mix all play a role.
@dennyhall69
@dennyhall69 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, glad I am not the only one that seen that. It is harder for a large truck to push through cold air. I noticed that they was bundled up when testing the f250
@heatheredwards5933
@heatheredwards5933 4 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to the ike gauntlet!
@TheWolverine-rm2kr
@TheWolverine-rm2kr 4 жыл бұрын
Omg my dad used to work for Cimarron Trailers in Chickasha, Oklahoma!!!
@zachengland3593
@zachengland3593 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you guys! These real world reviews are truly a God send.
@shimmysham5825
@shimmysham5825 4 жыл бұрын
Really enjoy this and all of your videos, you guys are great!
@MrDylanMitchell
@MrDylanMitchell 4 жыл бұрын
Great comparison and you're the only one doing doing towing tests. Like to see you add coolant temp and EGT to your tests. EGT is usually a diesel thing but towing it would be interesting to see how gas exgdust temps under load.
@videopipeline6419
@videopipeline6419 4 жыл бұрын
EGT matters on turbocharged engines because of the boost. EGT is not an issue on naturally aspirated engines, even when towing heavy uphill. Engine oil & trans. oil temps are.
@cparent2012
@cparent2012 4 жыл бұрын
Just want to say you guys do an amazing job all the time! For future comparison videos, would it be possible to film both trucks on the same day with Mr Truck in the other vehicle to eliminate variables like the wind and weather conditions if it could be done logisticly.
@randallnorling5679
@randallnorling5679 3 жыл бұрын
I had a2500 Ram power wagon and I loved the engine in it, it was a 6.4 gas and it would do anything that I needed it to do. Love love love the power wagon
@joseortega555
@joseortega555 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for this video. Now I just have to wait a couple of years to see if either one comes up with problems. Both of them do better than my 2500hd 6.0. I get 14.5 and never go over 65 mph.
@theninja001
@theninja001 4 жыл бұрын
These MPG numbers just make me want to hold on to my 1996 Cummins 12v even more! Lol
@jonybravo5650
@jonybravo5650 4 жыл бұрын
What's your mpgs?
@happydoggs
@happydoggs 4 жыл бұрын
With my 06 duramax dually towing a 31k lb trailer of hay I got 9.8 mpg on a 77 mile trip with several decent sized hills. And I get about 15 mpg on the same loop with a 15k lb stock trailer. So this test surprised me with how awful the gas mileage is with these modern gas engines towing a trailer
@gbrewer1296
@gbrewer1296 4 жыл бұрын
MPG will get better as they break in for sure lol
@scaircrow64
@scaircrow64 4 жыл бұрын
Hey me too!! With the 4x4, 5 speed 3.50 gears I get 16 city and 20.3 highway unloaded at 65 mph! What in the world is ford doing?!
@chrisdavenport6585
@chrisdavenport6585 4 жыл бұрын
@@happydoggs probably not by much.
@jonnycash6909
@jonnycash6909 4 жыл бұрын
Good review. Thanks. Thinking instead of new truck, reinvest in my truck. 96 F. 250 w/460. I can save lil gas and a lot of 💰 when new one is 50K
@mikehaslett3738
@mikehaslett3738 2 жыл бұрын
There is a good video from bad tree productions on one of their trucks. Look it up. They did a Holley sniper throttle body with the factory efi on the 460. Actually worked really well. I think they were around 15/16mpg on it. And a considerable power gain
@stinger4583
@stinger4583 4 жыл бұрын
Keep those 7.3 tests coming. Thanks.
@cliftonsheldon9134
@cliftonsheldon9134 4 жыл бұрын
I love this show. First its a great show , Second these guys are local and its a lot of fun recognizing all of the places they go..... Like the Love's station in Hudson and then driving around the Front Range in Longmont and boulder
@frankd.3985
@frankd.3985 4 жыл бұрын
Air temperature also makes quite a bit of difference in MPG comparisons. I used to have a Ford extended E-350 with a V-10. In cold weather (20 degrees F) it'd get about 13 MPG with about 3500# of cargo. In 70 degree weather, it'd be up to 16 MPG. If your comparing MPG you have to keep the conditions the same as possible. Also the MPG with a gas engine may be lower, but cost of maintenance and intital cost compared to a diesel is also lower. I've got a diesel that I pull my 5th wheel camper with and I love it, but I don't think you ever get you money back. Thank you for all of your great tests.
@gjolinares23
@gjolinares23 2 жыл бұрын
If you did that’s amazing. Those numbers sound quite a bit over shot though. Are you sure you did the math right? The V-10s were said to be around 10mpg empty and drop when hauling weren’t they?
@HioSSilver1999
@HioSSilver1999 4 жыл бұрын
Very similar mpg's to what i seen in my old 2500 6.0 Silverado with 4.10s when it was stock.
@davidcoalkey6074
@davidcoalkey6074 4 жыл бұрын
"we had some wind" wind makes a huge difference.
@louisg8389
@louisg8389 3 жыл бұрын
this is the most important youtube channel for truck buyers
@bradenreed1152
@bradenreed1152 4 жыл бұрын
What concerns me is longevity on these 8 and 10 speeds, they do a lot more shifting especially pulling or driving in the hills. Maybe I'm wrong but my basic knowledge on transmissions make me thing more shifting= more wear and potentially more heat?
@workct4102
@workct4102 Жыл бұрын
I have not noticed that. From a 4spd to a 10 spd, 5.4 to a 3.5 EB, the newer truck does stay in 8th most of my towing trips, but the power difference in the engines allows it to stay put, where the 5.4 would kick to 3rd and rev to 4k. Haven't needed the 3.5 up that high yet.
@lfsracer79
@lfsracer79 4 жыл бұрын
6:24 Semi truck fuel economy
@joshualester2735
@joshualester2735 4 жыл бұрын
Some of trucks are hitting 10+ loaded now. Crazy. Our v10 school buses get 7.5 even with all the stops go and idle time. And 8.5 with Cummins. Though the diesels are all being phased out. Too slow, slow heat, and way more maintenance cost. Plus the noise/vibration. The gassers are so much nicer to drive.
@gregparrott
@gregparrott 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this great test!. I own a 2017 F-350 SRW Diesel and have tested how MPG suffers as a function of speed and strong headwinds. This includes driving through stretches of Utah which permit 80MPH (85MPH is not challenged). With no trailer, the MPG loss between 60MPH and 85MPH was ~30%. Strong headwinds hurt a lot as well, and diminished your F250 trailer test. Still, I'm disappointed by Ford's MPG. Being purpose built for trucks, I expected better from the 7.3.
@buckhorncortez
@buckhorncortez 4 жыл бұрын
Depending upon the wind - that can really kill mileage. My F350 with a camper averages 12.3 with no wind. On a windy day the mileage can go as low as 9.5 MPG. You need to re-run the test on a day with no wind if you can do that.
@stevenblake6939
@stevenblake6939 2 жыл бұрын
It was windy for the Chevy too!
@S97795
@S97795 4 жыл бұрын
Good video, interesting results. Both ford and Chevy will still be my favorite 2 truck brands
@marcojordan1368
@marcojordan1368 4 жыл бұрын
Chevy is my favorite trucks
@liljohnny2.065
@liljohnny2.065 4 жыл бұрын
Chevy and ford are the best.
@S97795
@S97795 4 жыл бұрын
Lil Johnny2.0 agreed
@tazchapman692
@tazchapman692 4 жыл бұрын
Hey @The Fast Lane Truck, Can you do this test again with one of the higher level 7.3L Super Duties, with ECO switched on and off in both scenarios as a comparison? I'm curious if that actually makes a difference! Thanks, Awesome content as always!
@chinomustang550
@chinomustang550 4 жыл бұрын
Well I just ordered a 2020 f350 with the 7.3 and I can't wait. I don't get trucks for gas mileage but I'll take 15mpg.
@icu_corey_rn_903
@icu_corey_rn_903 4 жыл бұрын
Glad u guys went with basically a work truck trim f-250 gas it’s something most hard working people could afford rather than a platinum good job
@GoOutdoorsMore5420
@GoOutdoorsMore5420 4 жыл бұрын
48 gallon tank! I I can hear my bank account screaming now 😅
@mdingle11
@mdingle11 4 жыл бұрын
Sure it's a large tank but it uses the same amount of fuel if not less than a tundra which has a 26 gallon tank. Less stops needed to fill up.
@GoOutdoorsMore5420
@GoOutdoorsMore5420 4 жыл бұрын
Micheal Dingle agreed.👍
@justinw.2376
@justinw.2376 4 жыл бұрын
Micheal Dingle id still hate to be looking at the screen at the pump when I’m filling up from 1/4 tank lol
@loganholmberg2295
@loganholmberg2295 4 жыл бұрын
Gives you allot more range when you need it. My 2014 Sierra 1500 has only 26 gal and I wish it had 30 or more. I've taken it to places in Northern Canada with long distances between fuel stops. Which makes me wonder. How big was the fuel tank on the Chevy they tested? All that extra fuel weight might account for the difference in fuel economy.
@unitedgray
@unitedgray 4 жыл бұрын
@@loganholmberg2295 Agreed. I love the 36 gal tank on my F-150.
@atfsgeoff
@atfsgeoff 4 жыл бұрын
Not unreasonable figures, they might improve with break-in and summer blend gas
@sheyanderson4371
@sheyanderson4371 4 жыл бұрын
That mileage matches the best I can get out of my 04 5.4L F-150. I was one who expected a little more from the 7.3L, but Ford also has said that one of the major factors of going back to this big of an engine was the ability to work on it. They expect the majority of these to be fleet trucks and the ability to service/repair them quickly is a big selling point and saves a lot of money in the long run. It is made to house a big Diesel engine, but there is more room under the hood in that 7.3L then some V8 half tons.
@Rcblueox
@Rcblueox 4 жыл бұрын
Cant wait for the 4.30 gears test been waiting seems like forever
@taylor5542
@taylor5542 4 жыл бұрын
Considering it's a brick. 15 mpg ain't bad. The chev has a better drag coefficient. I think it'll even out on the ike, when aero is not a factor. 🤙🏻
@tcmtech7515
@tcmtech7515 4 жыл бұрын
But whats it real world power and MPG numbers once the limp mode comes on due to whatever $1000+ emissions component of the week going out, since that's pretty much how every diesel I have seen built in the last nearing 10 years actually spends most of it life opperatiing running as? OH, wait! It's not a diesel so it doesn't have that problem! :D
@themartimus1748
@themartimus1748 4 жыл бұрын
If the 7.3 coupled up with a 4.30 rear end is any thing like my 6.2 gas it will do great.
@TheMCD1989
@TheMCD1989 4 жыл бұрын
I just bought a '19 F350 with the 6.2 and 4.30s, so far I love it the only complaint is the god awful mileage. Coming from a 2005 Cummins towing on the highway leaves something to be desired but anything under 50/55 I think the 6.2 is as good if not better than the 6 speed common rail.
@themartimus1748
@themartimus1748 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah it took me some time gettin use to a gas motor but I’ve had mine for 5 years now and it’s been the best vehicle I’ve ever owned. It’s got 149000 miles on it and I pull constantly. I’m off road a lot with me job to. I’ve put on 1 front axle , battery. And brakes. Other than that change the oil ($26) and that’s it.
@georgiafan6618
@georgiafan6618 4 жыл бұрын
The 4.30 would help.
@themartimus1748
@themartimus1748 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah man. I like the 4.30
@Danlovestrivium
@Danlovestrivium 4 жыл бұрын
@@TheMCD1989 That's where the 10 speed might come in.
@MSparks9509
@MSparks9509 4 жыл бұрын
Please run the MPG towing loop with this truck/Cimmaron trailer to see how it compares to the 7.3 with 3.55 gears.
@jonhoon
@jonhoon 4 жыл бұрын
I have the SuperCab F250 and I averaged around 15.5 mpg combined. I lifted it 4 in and put 37s on so now I’m at 12.5 mpg
@chriswinkler1313
@chriswinkler1313 4 жыл бұрын
Can we do the Ram 6.4l next??
@4-LOW
@4-LOW 4 жыл бұрын
I just can't believe GM made their truck look like a catfish.
@talon0863
@talon0863 4 жыл бұрын
lol
@Onechrispbacon
@Onechrispbacon 4 жыл бұрын
The mustang looks more like a catfish lol
@peytonschuldt1045
@peytonschuldt1045 3 жыл бұрын
That good sir..... Is spot on.. lol. And I have a chevy..
4 жыл бұрын
Another great video guys!!!!! Thanks!!!
@CJColvin
@CJColvin 4 жыл бұрын
This is awesome battle of the Big Block V8 mate. Ford 7.3L Godzilla V8 vs GM 6.6L Ecotec gas V8.
@brinkme1772
@brinkme1772 4 жыл бұрын
I get 13mpg in my '11 f250 2wd w/ 6.2 gasser ... I'd call 15mpg a decent improvement.
@ronaldpalma9812
@ronaldpalma9812 4 жыл бұрын
I just can’t get over how damn ugly those chevys are. Goodness!!
@JS-nd1po
@JS-nd1po 4 жыл бұрын
It’s great that we have these truck wars as it helps the consumer. I do have to agree that Chevys are butt ass ugly.
@treykolski9411
@treykolski9411 4 жыл бұрын
Also thought that but now that I’ve seen in it person really changed my opinion
@treykolski9411
@treykolski9411 4 жыл бұрын
J S lot better looking in person in my opinion
@BrackishMongrel
@BrackishMongrel 4 жыл бұрын
Right! It looks like they just threw their hands in the air and gave up on coming up with a better design.
@DragonKnightX12
@DragonKnightX12 4 жыл бұрын
Saw one in person, it didn’t too bad. The GMC still looks miles better.
@golfbravowhiskey8669
@golfbravowhiskey8669 4 жыл бұрын
My 7.3 wouldn’t get 15 mpg if you dropped it out of an airplane. Running around out in the pasture driving to town averages about 9 to 10 miles a gallon Drove it the other day on the open road with the cruise set at 68 miles an hour averaged about 13.1 with a 355. Still a heck of a lot better than my old 454. Technology has come along ways.
@swpa8742
@swpa8742 4 жыл бұрын
I think it’s worth mentioning the 4 door cab weights a lot more then a standard cab, sometimes by as much as 1000 pounds.
@treverb3183
@treverb3183 4 жыл бұрын
You can't compare tests from different times of year. You need to take into account winter fuel and summer fuel blends. Also air temperature will affect fuel milage. To compare they need to be tested at the same time under the same conditions with the same fuel.
@acdii
@acdii 4 жыл бұрын
Agreed. A truer test would have been them running side by side at the same time, pulling the same weight(GCVW), and then compare. Considering both test runs of the F250 were into the wind accounts for something as well as the winter blend fuel.
@wiks101
@wiks101 4 жыл бұрын
@@acdii um they drove a loop so one way was into the wind and the other would be with the wind at your back. so it all cancels its out.
@acdii
@acdii 4 жыл бұрын
@@wiks101 Did they have the same with the other truck? If not, then not a true comparison. Besides, a head wind can really affect MPG more than a tail wind, so it wont really cancel it out unless the tail wind is at least 10 MPH more.
@T51B1
@T51B1 4 жыл бұрын
@@acdii What a geographical and physics oddity--Into the wind down AND back, in a down and back comparison!
@acdii
@acdii 4 жыл бұрын
@@T51B1 Where did you read they had a head wind both ways? Did they really?
@royrichardson9164
@royrichardson9164 4 жыл бұрын
If I was actually towing weight like that I wouldn't even bother with a 3.55 gear for the 7.3 engine
@codyparker679
@codyparker679 4 жыл бұрын
I'd go stright for the 430. Gasser l love deep gears
@serfnuts
@serfnuts 4 жыл бұрын
The 3.55 is only rated to tow 12k I think. The 4.30 can do 15k.
@acdii
@acdii 4 жыл бұрын
The 10 speed makes up for it, it has a really low first gear.
@Purdue03b
@Purdue03b 4 жыл бұрын
@@serfnuts If it was only rated to tow 12k, why did TFL just tow 14.5k?
@Nostradamus_Order33
@Nostradamus_Order33 4 жыл бұрын
What happened to the 3.73 ?
@marshallhamelwright6410
@marshallhamelwright6410 4 жыл бұрын
Only question is where did Mr. Truck get that jacket?!? Looks so damn good and I need it!
@brucelee64485
@brucelee64485 4 жыл бұрын
I would be interested in seeing a towing test done with the premium unleaded fuel just for interests on if the mileage gets better when using the high octane fuel. Thanks for the video!!
@harveyschindler9554
@harveyschindler9554 Жыл бұрын
High octane does not directly mean more power. It allows higher compression motors to use fuel more efficiently ( less preignition).
@RobbDzzz
@RobbDzzz 4 жыл бұрын
Since it’s mostly a freeway loop, the weight had less to do with economy than the winds and temps. The comparison to the GM at this point is purely anecdotal. Need same trailer and load with same atmospherics to get a reasonable comparison.
@billiebuckamer8189
@billiebuckamer8189 4 жыл бұрын
GMs get better real world gas mileage.
@RobbDzzz
@RobbDzzz 4 жыл бұрын
Billie Buckamer based on what evidence?
@anthonyhales4192
@anthonyhales4192 4 жыл бұрын
@@billiebuckamer8189 I agree but its god awful ugly.
@anthonyhales4192
@anthonyhales4192 4 жыл бұрын
My 99 f250 gets 9mpg. ( lifted 33s) empty. I could care less its a great truck. A good engine will only cost you fuel thats it
@chiefbeef2947
@chiefbeef2947 4 жыл бұрын
Robb M the video
@LondonHasFallin
@LondonHasFallin 4 жыл бұрын
My father has a 2014 Ford F150. It averages 13mpg. Without a load. (Edit) His truck is lifted slightly and has 35×12R18 tires.
@jase1911
@jase1911 4 жыл бұрын
He needs to keep his foot off the gas mine gets 16 -22mpg
@marcusmcintire6683
@marcusmcintire6683 4 жыл бұрын
That's odd. What octane fuel is he using and does he haul stuff in the back or pull a trailer? Driving short distance lowers mpg's as well like in my '13 F150 with a 5.0L. I drive a 2 mile round trip 5 day's a week and 20 mile round trip on Sunday. My mileage is 7.2 mpg.
@jase1911
@jase1911 4 жыл бұрын
RIP off the stock exhaust and put in a K&N air filter plus air up your tires to almost max psi that helps immensely
@ZurkeyTurkey
@ZurkeyTurkey 4 жыл бұрын
something isnt right with that truck then my average between highway and city is about 17-18mpg
@ZurkeyTurkey
@ZurkeyTurkey 4 жыл бұрын
And that's half the reason why I wanna upgrade to an 18+, the fuel economy
@TRB02ss
@TRB02ss 4 жыл бұрын
Those trucks get same mpg than my 2012 tuned dmax . Thats impressive.
@nhlcfl7733
@nhlcfl7733 2 жыл бұрын
Here’s my 1.5 yr. ownership experience with the 2020 Chevy 2500 experience below. Thanks guys for your test reviews of this and the Chevy. And for your honest reactions that I noticed Andre seemed to hope the Ford Godzilla would do better than the Chevy especially since the Chevy pulled a heavier trailer. I’ve sensed from other videos how Andre likes the “Godzilla” name and all. To keep this peaceful, both essentially get within 1 mpg of each other, how’s that? PS, I own my 2020 Chevy 6.6L gasser and … love it thus far. I get 17-18 mpg US on Hwy and 14-15 city and worse for both in winter. I Love the 82” long standard bed, the front & rear side steps (plus the optional side mounted Bed Storage Boxes leaving 4 ft. Width in my box yet lots of storage = Awesome!!!) direct fuel injection engine with the JD Power proven reliability and beefed up 6L90 transmission for this new 6.6L. Because I live in an area that has +6 months of real winter, I appreciate the AutoTrac transfer case for more secure winter driving.
@billstewart2433
@billstewart2433 4 жыл бұрын
It shows that V8's are the same as they were 50 (or more) years ago, unloaded 15 mpg. Nothing new under the sun. :)
@snikesnover1831
@snikesnover1831 4 жыл бұрын
bill stewart and that will be $53,000 thanks here are the keys
@jakecreech1659
@jakecreech1659 4 жыл бұрын
Bill you gotta remember that these engines have almost twice the output and the trucks weigh 30 percent more than the old ones. I understand what you are getting at though.
@Sorensenator86
@Sorensenator86 4 жыл бұрын
@@jakecreech1659 ya bill
@smiller225
@smiller225 4 жыл бұрын
Except new trucks have twice the power output, way more towing capacity, quicker acceleration better everything and probably better fuel economy
@Andy-eh9qr
@Andy-eh9qr 4 жыл бұрын
The new trucks are also at the mercy of the EPA. They’d use half the fuel otherwise.
@jedibusiness789
@jedibusiness789 4 жыл бұрын
CHEVY WINS AGAIN....nothing beats a LS motor. I get the same mileage with a 6.0 w a 4.10.
@donaldthomas5852
@donaldthomas5852 3 жыл бұрын
MK I have 6.0 with 3.73 and it gets about the same pulling but empty 14 mpg it has 197,000 miles on the engine
@mesanders1113
@mesanders1113 3 жыл бұрын
I used to have a 2000 chevy 2500 4x4 6.0 4l80 it got 12mpg on the freeway
@R85DAVID
@R85DAVID 3 жыл бұрын
I love Ford but their engines are over complicated and break down more easily. Chevy is smart, small block pushrod v8’s will never die as long as they keep it simple.
@smsteger89
@smsteger89 3 жыл бұрын
4.10 gearing sucks though
@mikcun2799
@mikcun2799 3 жыл бұрын
The 6.6l l8t they tested here was actually not a LS engine. They are a fifth generation sbc like the 6.2l, but are stroked to 6.6l. So they are in the new "LT" engine family.
@oldguysrock2170
@oldguysrock2170 4 жыл бұрын
I have watched many videos with truck comparisons. There are the Ford Guys, Dodge guys, and the Chevy men! When trucks come off of the showroom floors, stuff works. After 100,000 miles, let me see which trucks are still performing at a satisfactory level. New trucks have wat to many bells and whistle gadgets and that leads to more failures. I live in a harsh winter climate 5 months out of the year in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Mechanical door steps, multi use tailgates, auto tailgates, low profile wheels, fancy chrome trim, and lady features! All that stuff fails at -10 and in deep snow with a 100 Libs of ice stuck to the truck. Ford has tons of great tech! Dodge plenty of power with a Yugo transmission! And the Chevy with a check engine light. I got 240,000 on my 02 Chevy Avalanche and it lasted 17 years before I sold it. I bought a 14 Chevy WT 1500 with 100,000 and it works great. Not a lot of bells and whistles, but practical. I just want a rust proof truck, which the manufacturers can make but they won’t.
@lanceleavitt7472
@lanceleavitt7472 Жыл бұрын
Just to put things in perspective, my 454 BBC with an NP 4500 gets 8.2 MPG on the open road, and 7.9 in town. So, your 15 and 16 MPG sound pretty good to me. --- Thanks for the great upload. ---
@Brian_Tomlinson
@Brian_Tomlinson 4 жыл бұрын
Yikes ! I think I’ll keep my 3.5 EB
@mario-sl6cz
@mario-sl6cz 4 жыл бұрын
I say re do the test in warmer weather like you did with the chevy
@leroyroutt4791
@leroyroutt4791 4 жыл бұрын
Love the video, a little disappointed with the 7.3 fuel economy. Hopefully it will get better once the engine gets broke in. Can't wait to see it on the Ike Gauntlet !
@sammysampson183
@sammysampson183 4 жыл бұрын
I have a 01' SuperDuty 4x4 with the 6.8 V10. With over 130K miles on the clock it gets 14 mpg at 65 mph empty and when I towed my 11,000 lb trailer from Seattle to Maine, I averaged 8.5 mpg for the 3,200 mile trip. My truck weighs 7,800 lbs empty. Considering that it is in great shape and paid for, I would be hard pressed to buy new when the fuel consumption numbers are not any better.
@T51B1
@T51B1 4 жыл бұрын
Your results are pretty much exactly what I expected; comparable but with the 6.6L doing a bit better. Direct injection is simply better from a pure power and efficiency standpoint.
@darens440
@darens440 4 жыл бұрын
Once again GM proves to have the best gas V8. The rest of the truck is still up for debate. I must say ford did good for port injection.
@rustynail914
@rustynail914 4 жыл бұрын
Chevy makes a great truck.....this year's front end and mirrors just look like hot garbage.
@icu_corey_rn_903
@icu_corey_rn_903 4 жыл бұрын
I’ll hand it to GM they know how to make a solid gas v8 they’ve been doing it since the small block Chevy days
@keithwalters2511
@keithwalters2511 4 жыл бұрын
I have a 2500 Chevy heavy duty. Mirrors are awesome for visibility around them. The chrome front looks much better. Absolutely love my truck
@stacyadiaz
@stacyadiaz 4 жыл бұрын
I loved the longevity of my old 6.0 gas in the 2500HD I had but the 6.2 gas in my current F-250 pulls much stronger. I wished GM wouldn't have waited so long to upgrade the 6.0
@EliteFlight
@EliteFlight 4 жыл бұрын
Arnold D The 6.0 were junk motors. I’ve known people who have blown em up before the 150k mark.
@hitempguy
@hitempguy 4 жыл бұрын
This interests me greatly. Diesel has been 30% more than gas in Canada and I'm not towing as much anymore.
@tytomlinson7831
@tytomlinson7831 4 жыл бұрын
Another great vedio guys. I don't recall. Did the Chevy also require midgrade fuel?
@whispr6331
@whispr6331 4 жыл бұрын
Finally! We have results! Nice vid guys. Imo, the ford could do better, a couple examples on youtube were achieving much better gas mileage but, the real world varies based on altitude, temperature, how flat the road is, etc Depending on where people live, their numbers can be better or they can be worse, im rootin tootin for the the big block Ferd!
@yoddy0
@yoddy0 4 жыл бұрын
Except wouldn’t you assume the same for the competition as well then?
@justinluttrell1769
@justinluttrell1769 4 жыл бұрын
Altitude mostly in this case. I took my V8 F-150 from Florida to ~6,300' elevation and lost about 2mpg hwy.
@nateyoung6331
@nateyoung6331 4 жыл бұрын
So imagine gm adding a 10 speed to their new gasser. Might be better than 16 mpg.
@billiebuckamer8189
@billiebuckamer8189 4 жыл бұрын
I don't think more gears is always a good thing. I recall on another Gauntlet test one of the two trucks tested had more gears and it kept upshifting and taking the engine out of the power zone. Then the engine would begin to strain and the truck would downshift. It cycled like this the whole way up the mountain...very annoying if I recall. That said, the Ford has good torque so it may not be an issue.
@cb2536
@cb2536 4 жыл бұрын
I drive the same loop 6 nights a week I get 2-3 more mpg in the winter vs summer.
@jrholeman
@jrholeman 4 жыл бұрын
Nice trailer. 👍🏼👊🏼
@paullang1505
@paullang1505 4 жыл бұрын
$53,000 for any pickup truck is ridiculous and gluttonous. The rate that pickup truck prices have risen is absolutely crazy. I hope someone takes a serious look at this... It's right in line of paying $100 for sliced up jeans...
@Spahi77
@Spahi77 4 жыл бұрын
I agree....I bought my 15 Duramax ccsb for 51k out the door in Feb of 2015 it was 63k sticker....it was a bit high at the time, but when I see a similarly equipped truck today is close to 80k sticker.....yes, it's glutinous or as some might say, capitalism/ supply/ demand. Definitely not inflation at work. No way can I grabbed a LTZ today in the 50k range...it will correct.
@gregoryfuller9361
@gregoryfuller9361 4 жыл бұрын
I agree 100%. I personally don't need a brand new vehicle . If I had the money for a diesel or gas hd truck I'd go between 2005 to 2010 if I could swing it. 50,000 f150's I mean really . Not knocking Ford btw they're all doing it now.
@royrichardson9164
@royrichardson9164 4 жыл бұрын
Nothing but FACTS! idk care how they are optioned out and how great they try and make them out to be...
@ridethetiger1895
@ridethetiger1895 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah they are a lot of money but if you count in inflation even my 2001 F150 sticker prices was just under 32k new and adjusted for inflation its 48k in 2019 money. Considering all the technology and advances it's really not that bad, it's the cost of living and wages that have not kept up with cost of things.
@dreadnoughtprime6301
@dreadnoughtprime6301 4 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure what you base your statement on. What do you think they should cost and why?
@jveat6598
@jveat6598 4 жыл бұрын
Now let’s see the ram 6.4 hemi with the 8 speed please!
@sashashpiruk4865
@sashashpiruk4865 4 жыл бұрын
I just bought a 2019 ram 3500 6.4 hemi standard cab long bed 4x4. 410 rear. Left nj with 900 miles on the truck. Drove to SW Florida towing 7000lbs. Keeping@ 65 mph and tire pressure at 80psi. I got 12.0 mpg. Very impressed the way it towed and how the transmission acted. I'm a Cummings diesel guy and again I was very impressed...
@natetoland7537
@natetoland7537 4 жыл бұрын
@@sashashpiruk4865 my dad has a 2014 3500 and he says it's the biggest piece of trash, it's been to the dealer multiple times per month and now the dealer doesn't want to work on his truck anymore, he was probably just unlucky with his truck
@sashashpiruk4865
@sashashpiruk4865 4 жыл бұрын
@@natetoland7537 I'm sorry to hear that sir. I use to be a die hard Ford guy. But since the 6.0 and 6.4 diesel problems I went Cummings and Rams. I've had nothing but good luck with them. I use them for my transport business and snow plowing. I'm not a fan boy. Just have good luck.
@DragonKnightX12
@DragonKnightX12 4 жыл бұрын
Nate Toland Probably got a lemon. Should of used the lemon law to get a new one.
@shitloveaduck
@shitloveaduck 4 жыл бұрын
Sasha Shpiruk - Cummins, Cummins. No g in there,,,,, hahaha. I have heard the same good reports about the Ram Diesels in the Ranching industry as well. All the diesel trucks are good with today’s engines, forgetting the past, but the most loyal followers seem to be Ram! Nice to hear from someone who really uses them and not a mall crawler. (Which I have become since retiring, I used all Ford because I’m cheap, but I didn’t have any problems since 2000. One F350 gas in there, it was a giant pig on fuel.) I have owned well over 100 trucks in my life but I’m done with first hand knowledge of work trucks as of last year. Maybe I will see more of your comments!! Stay safe out there, Eh.
@makingitmine
@makingitmine 4 жыл бұрын
Do you ever do a meet and greet for local viewers? I live in Brighton and love your videos. I could also be some ballast if you need a 290 pound passenger. 😂
@erikhaw7313
@erikhaw7313 4 жыл бұрын
Yay! Thank you guys!
@Mikemartin968
@Mikemartin968 4 жыл бұрын
Seems like they were making a lot of excuses for that F-250. 🤣
@shaun327
@shaun327 4 жыл бұрын
It's all physics when it comes to towing . Every truck is going to get similar mpg. What's more important in my opinion is brake distances, merge lane acceleration and overall handling.
@philtripe
@philtripe 4 жыл бұрын
is that why trucks twenty years ago got half the gas mileage? im going to send you a brain in the mail...you can stick it in your ear
@shaun327
@shaun327 4 жыл бұрын
I wasn't really referring to 20 year old trucks. Even so whatever truck your using to tow 14K pounds with, it just takes that much gas (energy to move it). Yes technology has changed and i'm not arguing that. If you took a 20 year old truck and strapped 14K trailer to it, I'd bet it would still get similar mileage towing as the new ones,.. single digit mpg. Technology or not it just takes fuel, the new ones of course do tow better. So yes a 20 year old truck would not get anywhere near the same mileage empty if that is your point, however I said when towing, not overall mpg.
@snikesnover1831
@snikesnover1831 4 жыл бұрын
My 2002 F250 with the 5.4 gasser can get 16+ mpg in the summer, and handle a 12,000 lb GVWR with plow and sander in the winter. It’s time to upgrade, but $53k is a tough pill to swallow.
@jasonmasters9653
@jasonmasters9653 4 жыл бұрын
@@philtripe and the funniest comment of 2020 goes to...... 2big 2fail
@rustynail914
@rustynail914 4 жыл бұрын
Not true. Different fuel systems and ignition systems can improve the energy lost by the fuel consumption of the engine. The modern engine is still only about 30% efficient. The rest of the gasoline is lost in the form of heat. Being able to capture more energy and use the gasoline more efficiently is constantly improving.
@nowayoutstp4
@nowayoutstp4 4 жыл бұрын
I like Mr. Truck, he cracks me up.
@LA-TEEZI
@LA-TEEZI 4 жыл бұрын
Sags quite a bit at the back. Some airbags or extra leaf would work wonders for nice towing rigs like that.
@boss2nine
@boss2nine 4 жыл бұрын
Winter fuel and wind will kill fuel economy every time.
@MountainMcCumbee
@MountainMcCumbee 4 жыл бұрын
boss2nine that’s why they used mid grade in the ford and regular in the Chevy. But the Chevy was still towing more weight.
@jackcurrence263
@jackcurrence263 4 жыл бұрын
Ideally, the GM and the Ford could have been tested on the same day (or even at the same time, for the unloaded test!) in order to eliminate weather/wind as a variable, but we (unfortunately) don't live in an ideal world. I admit to being pretty intrigued by the new 7.3L Ford gasser, but it is REALLY difficult to compete with GM on OHV gas V8s... that has been their bread and butter for YEARS, with no forays into OHC architecture, etc... to take engineering dollars away from the OHC V8 program(s).
@sly9263
@sly9263 2 жыл бұрын
I don't think it's difficult for Ford to compete with it.. GM is now in 3rd place for truck sales, behind even Ram. Ford is still the only manufacturer that makes their own engine, transmission, and axles. Also the 7.3 torque curve is superior to the 6.6 and has forged internals- forged crankshaft. The Silverado is still using a 6 speed on their gas v8...
@CortJohnson
@CortJohnson 2 жыл бұрын
Add up the numbers dude. When GMC and Chevy trucks are combined they easily outsell Ford. The 6 so is a proven workhorse. We’ll see how the 10 does
@sly9263
@sly9263 2 жыл бұрын
@@CortJohnson please explain the logic in how using two truck brands with double the overhead for manufacturing that barely leads Ford when combined is somehow meaningful... lmfao IDK why some fanboys are so desperate to claim #1 with an obscure and meaningless calculation. GM can't sell 1 pickup line anywhere close to F-series or Ram.
@zimks
@zimks 2 жыл бұрын
@@sly9263 GM just sold more trucks last month than Ford and Ram. It’s as simple as that.
@camclarke9952
@camclarke9952 2 жыл бұрын
@@sly9263 sounds like the only fan boy is you,,and ford has never outlived a Chevy truck,,do your research before you embarrass yourself anymore..
@retiredafce3373
@retiredafce3373 4 жыл бұрын
My 1990 f250 4x4 with the 460 gets 13.2 mpg driving at 60 mph. It has 165,483 miles on the original engine.
@406Steven
@406Steven 4 жыл бұрын
You must have the E4OD and 3.73 gears. I had a similar F-250 (regular cab long box, nothing huge) with the 460, C6, and 4.10s and it had a hard time getting double-digit MPGs. I think the best I ever did was around 12 but that's no Overdrive and big gears in the rear end. It would pull anything you wanted it to but sucked gas down. The 460 would do 300k+ miles no trouble, I know plenty of people who used to use them pulling race cars and campers cross-country.
@retiredafce3373
@retiredafce3373 4 жыл бұрын
@@406Steven it does have the E4OD with 4.10's and stock size tires/wheels. In town it 10mpg.
@justinjones5288
@justinjones5288 4 жыл бұрын
If you was to bump up the timing and get the engines burning the fuel better they could probably pickup a few mpg. Gm’s 6.0’s have always had minimum timing from the factory hence why they gain 50hp from tune alone.
@user-wq8bh4ct3u
@user-wq8bh4ct3u 4 жыл бұрын
@9:24 why was the F250 towing less weight than the Silverado...
@freedomlawnservice1987
@freedomlawnservice1987 3 жыл бұрын
All the ford could handle
@freedomlawnservice1987
@freedomlawnservice1987 3 жыл бұрын
Ford is weighed down in back
@David-yy7lb
@David-yy7lb 4 жыл бұрын
Who want a transmission that's hunts through 7-10 gears all the time.....
@gen-x-zeke8446
@gen-x-zeke8446 4 жыл бұрын
As long as you're not dealing with too many hills, then you won't be worrying about 7-10. My buddy is a mechanic and he's probably 75% reliable which I can say more for some people.
@JS-nd1po
@JS-nd1po 4 жыл бұрын
Thats one issue I have with GM truck transmissions. They don’t like to shift and they will sit in a gear and high rev unless you punch the gas.
@tedschmitt178
@tedschmitt178 4 жыл бұрын
After having a F-150 with the 10 speed and towing 6200 pounds, and trying to tow that same 6200 pounds with a 6-speed F-150, I will take the 10 speed ALL DAY LONG. Period.
@mattg7952
@mattg7952 4 жыл бұрын
The EPA.
@gloppy101
@gloppy101 4 жыл бұрын
Not tested under the SAME conditions.
@firebirdlover4460
@firebirdlover4460 6 ай бұрын
I've never been a Ford guy, but you really can't go wrong with either of these brands. Chevy and Ford definitely make each other better.
@linger2001
@linger2001 4 жыл бұрын
So you’re gonna be stopping for gas about every 250 miles. “I needed to stretch my legs anyway.”
@406Steven
@406Steven 4 жыл бұрын
I stop for gas about every 250 miles or so in my F-250, and 250-300 miles in my Impreza. Unless the Mrs is coming along, then we're stopping every 1-1.5 hours for a pee break and might as well top off the tank while we're stopped.
@ashes2ashes863
@ashes2ashes863 4 жыл бұрын
So much for the 10 speed giving it an edge... Also caught that they said the truck floated from 7 th gear to overdrive and back a lot. Maybe that's why GM kept the old 6 speed. These trucks were built for reliability first after all. I'm sure they are all making less power than they could too for reliability purposes.
@curtis1951
@curtis1951 4 жыл бұрын
Agreed. The gm trucks have always been about the total package. They have always been competitive despite not having the highest numbers.
@Welcometofacsistube
@Welcometofacsistube 4 жыл бұрын
Lol GM and reliability?
@matthewrobertson156
@matthewrobertson156 4 жыл бұрын
I factor in the differential gear. That Chevy test was a 3.73 rear end. This Ford is running on winter gas with probably the heater running and on 3.55 gearing which is crazy for pulling this much weight.
@curtis1951
@curtis1951 4 жыл бұрын
@@Welcometofacsistube The only two trucks that had reliability problems on the Ike gauntlet were Ford's.
@arbiter1
@arbiter1 4 жыл бұрын
@@Welcometofacsistube um GM 6.0 liter? that thing built like a tank. My uncle had a work truck with it and it had 350k miles on it and still was going strong.
@renbarrus8003
@renbarrus8003 4 жыл бұрын
Will you guys do an in-depth video on the new single speed transfer case GM is offering? How 'terrain mode' actually performs and if there are any major pitfalls for opting out of a true 4L truck.
I Can't Believe We Did This...
00:38
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 83 МЛН
Русалка
01:00
История одного вокалиста
Рет қаралды 2,5 МЛН
When You Get Ran Over By A Car...
00:15
Jojo Sim
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
Towing with the F250 Tremor 7.3! MPG and RPM
38:06
BigBoyToyz
Рет қаралды 100 М.
5 Good, Bad Things About 2020 Ford F250 7.3L V8 W/MPG Test
23:16
Pickup Truck Plus SUV Talk
Рет қаралды 332 М.
Ford F-250 Buyers Guide | What would a Ford Tech Buy?
15:28
Flying Wrenches
Рет қаралды 95 М.
What I Really Think About The New 6.6L Gas Silverado! WORTH IT?
15:26
Как так то. Бедный мерседес
0:39
AVTO-MOTO ★GARAGE★
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН
#bugatti #tourbillon #2024 جديد بوغاتي #music #anime #beats
0:15
W truck driver #edit #trollface
0:20
TRET1
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН
Машина как дом
0:31
Рубить Правду
Рет қаралды 185 М.
very dangerous 😱 & heavy duty 🚜 |69| #loader #cars #constructionvehicle #loadertruck #cranetruck
0:14
MK Bike Stunt• 532k views • 8 hours ago
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН