How the French built the fastest plane in the world... Nord Griffon 1500

  Рет қаралды 438,773

Found And Explained

Found And Explained

Жыл бұрын

Help Found And Explained + Get 10% off your first website and domain
www.squarespace.com/found
We have another channel:
• Launched from the bigg...
Discord: / discord
My News Channel: / @aviationstationyt
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @foundandexplained
Patreon:
/ foundandexplained

Пікірлер: 857
@frankleespeaking9519
@frankleespeaking9519 Жыл бұрын
I was in the USAF on F15s ‘90-‘96… you gotta give the French credit for having their own aircraft industry. They make good aircraft. Who wants to go to an airshow with 25 F35s from 25 different countries.
@ommsterlitz1805
@ommsterlitz1805 Жыл бұрын
don't worry out of all 25 F-35 only 20 will be able to fly after
@Narses_the_aremnian
@Narses_the_aremnian Жыл бұрын
Did you bomb bosnian serbs in 94?
@antoinelemoine9222
@antoinelemoine9222 Жыл бұрын
as a french that's very kind of you thanks and i agree with you. Sweden probaby deserves some love too, they had some cool ideas. Russia too but obviously its complicated now...
@nedkelly9688
@nedkelly9688 Жыл бұрын
@@antoinelemoine9222 lol so did Australia and actually still does. Australia designed a jet in late 1940's and would of been released early 1950's with a top speed over Mach 1.5 but was shut down by UK and USA as didn't want a British colony to make a plane better then their own. CAC CA23 was put down as a bad design but even Russia stole the design for the SU7. If let alone to produce i am sure Australian aviation would be at the forefront now. Can tell by Australian designed and built MQ28A Ghost Bat most advanced drone in the world. Hopefully Australian company will be 1st to fly a scramjet powered drone next year and break fastest aircraft in the world before anyone else does. Australia has world fastest scramjet engine at mach 12 and never mentioned in hypersonics. even though a Australian Ray Stalker was 1st to get essence of flight from scramjets.
@kayzenl7911
@kayzenl7911 11 ай бұрын
@@presidenteden6498just to see the rafale capable to hold on respect a f22 raptor costing many times more than a rafale is an outstanding performance by the french
@deltavee2
@deltavee2 Жыл бұрын
I have long held great admiration generally for French engineering's outside the box thinking particularly when it comes to cars and aircraft.
@Pierrot9315
@Pierrot9315 11 ай бұрын
Particularly for cars, god do I love hydraulic suspension, and Citroën in general
@kayzenl7911
@kayzenl7911 11 ай бұрын
You should check French engineering about naval warfare and especially Battleships. Richelieu got unlucky during the war but it was far more capable than the German Bismarck rival for exemple. One of the most powerful ship with almost 250k HP which allowed the Richelieu to reach 37knots. One of the first radar, A true fast reload system without losing track of the enemy ship would be later copied by the US in 1943 when the Richelieu came to NY for reparations and refit of its AA. Truly impressive, a lot is still the be say with their after war design for CV, DDS and heavy cruiser
@Pierrot9315
@Pierrot9315 11 ай бұрын
@@kayzenl7911 and particularly for the BPC now, which is a true littoral combat ship. Even for land systems, ours are quirky, but well suited for their environment. The AMX 10 and the Sagaie comes to mind. The VAB too is a pretty nice vehicle
@andremontmartin7207
@andremontmartin7207 11 ай бұрын
THANKS. It is relatively rare for Americans, often hyper-nationalists, to recognize the value of foreign products
@jeffdebruges1819
@jeffdebruges1819 11 ай бұрын
Et le train...? The TGV...
@alfrancisbuada2591
@alfrancisbuada2591 Жыл бұрын
The French are so underrated.
@benoitpisarchick6866
@benoitpisarchick6866 Жыл бұрын
only in anglo saxon countries! ;)
@dennywhocares
@dennywhocares 11 ай бұрын
We are just really bad at marketing
@Letthatsinkin223
@Letthatsinkin223 11 ай бұрын
Merci beaucoup!
@bernardrocque6025
@bernardrocque6025 11 ай бұрын
@@dennywhocares Je ne crois pas . Notre problème c'est que les USA noyautent pa plupart des marchés , c'est d'abord une question de politique . Il fut un temps ou on parlait de d'impérialisme américain , c'est toujours un peu le cas . Il n'y à qu'à se rappeler le coup tordu des sous-marin pour l'Australie . Et la plupart des pays européens qui s'entêtent à acheter aux USA au détriment des fabricants européens , la Pologne par exemple qui achète en Corée du sud . Mais heureusement les industriels européens arrivent tout de même à monter des projet commun . Petit à petit les pays européens finissent par comprendre que les USA ne vont s'intéresser qu'à la question chinoise , il faudra bien surmonter cette nouvelle donne .
@user-rh1eg3vh4k
@user-rh1eg3vh4k 11 ай бұрын
A Concord?
@jeanbonnefoy1377
@jeanbonnefoy1377 Жыл бұрын
Most of those amazing so advanced projects (Griffon, Leduc, Atar VTOL, Balzac, Baroudeur and so on) were scrapped, victims of budget restrictions and the massive reshuffling of French air industry with the merger of all the public and semi or private companies (Nord, Ouest, Sud-Est, Sud-Ouest, etc.) in only two big ones: public Sud-Aviation (much later expanding to Aerospatiale and Airbus European endeavour) and private Dassault.
@Pwj579
@Pwj579 Жыл бұрын
Same thing happened to the Brits In the late 1960s . It eventually happened in late 1980s/ early 1990s with the end of the Cold War in the USA
@cybersentient4758
@cybersentient4758 Жыл бұрын
Ha balzac
@charlesrousseau6837
@charlesrousseau6837 Жыл бұрын
French aviation certainly has an interesting history regarding company reorganizations. Before WW2 a lot of private aircraft manufacturers became nationalized into what finallly got known as Nord, Sud-Ouest and Sud-Est Aviation, the fuss and efforts accompanied with all these reorganizations basically robbing the French of actual aircraft production capability when aircraft were urgently needed.
@vvvci
@vvvci Жыл бұрын
@@charlesrousseau6837 - yep... the usual LBO (profit for... lawyers and financers at expense of engineers and techs) "CONSOLIDATION," "bigger will make everything better" b.s. By contrast, EVERYONE KNOWS that SKUNK WORKS (Clarence Kelly's secret design teams within Lockheed) were a small, elite group that produced the SR-71
@johnthefishermanjohnhoyle5763
@johnthefishermanjohnhoyle5763 Жыл бұрын
Scrapped due to traitor leftist governments.
@Invisibilitylock
@Invisibilitylock Жыл бұрын
The plane shown in the thumbnail and in the title uses a ramjet not a rocket so it is a plane, he got it right
@skkrrtt55
@skkrrtt55 Жыл бұрын
So you're telling me the person who made the video did his research? I don't believe it
@allangibson8494
@allangibson8494 Жыл бұрын
Rockets can be airplanes. The question is whether the wings deliver lift in flight. The Me163 was an airplane… The X-15 was an airplane…
@hacoberthejacober3345
@hacoberthejacober3345 Жыл бұрын
For when you can’t surrender fast enough.
@demscrazy6574
@demscrazy6574 Жыл бұрын
@@allangibson8494the x-15 was a rocket with wings
@allangibson8494
@allangibson8494 Жыл бұрын
@@demscrazy6574 The X-15 was an aerodynamically lifted vehicle with a rocket for propulsion. Being a glider for landing make it an aeroplane (and so is the SpaceShuttle).
@ivanbarbancon8750
@ivanbarbancon8750 Жыл бұрын
M’y grandad actually worked on the air intakes of the Griffon, met multiple time the test pilot, André Turcat, and explained me how this fabulous had such a need for speed
@wokewokerman5280
@wokewokerman5280 Жыл бұрын
...amazing how much aviation advanced during this age of inspirational engineering, may he be remembered as a pioneer and an inspiration to many in the future.....
@johnthefishermanjohnhoyle5763
@johnthefishermanjohnhoyle5763 Жыл бұрын
sorry for that.
@stanleybuchan4610
@stanleybuchan4610 11 ай бұрын
Turcat was one of the Concord test pilots I believe.
@ivanbarbancon8750
@ivanbarbancon8750 11 ай бұрын
@@stanleybuchan4610 he was indeed also test pilot for concorde, but mainly test pilot for military aircrafts ;)
@martinquerre9614
@martinquerre9614 11 ай бұрын
???@@johnthefishermanjohnhoyle5763
@user-io2jz5me5c
@user-io2jz5me5c 11 ай бұрын
Merci à tous ceux qui ont eu la volonté de garder indépendante notre industrie aéronautique. Beaucoup de respect envers tous les ingénieurs et inventeurs de cette branche qui fait que notre avoir faire est reconnu dans le monde entier.
@domdenazareth5542
@domdenazareth5542 11 ай бұрын
Merci surtout à tous ceux qui prient le chapelet tous les jours. Comme l'a demandé Sainte Marguerite-Marie Alacoque à notre Roi Louis XIV, la France doit être consacrée au Sacré Coeur. Comme cela n'a pas été fait, 100 après jour pour jour la révolution a éclaté et permis la mort du descendant de Louis XIV. Jésus Christ qui est Dieu veut régner par la France sur le monde. Malheureusement, les Français sont devenus des chiens de Pavlov récitant à la place le crédo de la « république laïque » visant à nous annihiler de l'intérieur.
@Strayus
@Strayus 11 ай бұрын
c'etait avant..
@domdenazareth5542
@domdenazareth5542 11 ай бұрын
​@@Strayus ben non, encore récemment y a un français qui a inventé l'hydravion Akoya le plus rapide au monde. Airbus a aussi fait le Beluga et des A400 qui peuvent stocker 3 fois plus d'eau que des canadairs. Il faut revenir à la religion de nos ancêtres qui est détruite par Vatican 2 avec une nouvelle messe. Dieu a bien récompensé la France, ce sont les Français qui sont des ingrats. Aussi, vous devriez chercher pourquoi vous êtes démoralisé et écouter la vidéo de Yuri Besmenov avec sous-titres français sur YT si vous ne connaissez pas.
@user-zh9vs4jq2u
@user-zh9vs4jq2u 11 ай бұрын
Oui, c'était avant. Avant que les médiocres, les malveillants, les corrompus et les traîtres arrivent aux commandes.
@Spacepotato9202
@Spacepotato9202 10 ай бұрын
​@@Strayusce n'est pas parce que c'était avant, que cela ne peut pas être comme ça demain. Le peuple français à son destin entre ses mains tout est encore possible.
@hyrikul602
@hyrikul602 Жыл бұрын
It's crazy to think that the Ramjet was invented in France in 1913. Planes of the time weren't even capable of testing this new type of engine.
@YourFriendlyOfficeAssistant
@YourFriendlyOfficeAssistant Жыл бұрын
Well it makes sense. In principle, it is less complicated than a turbojet.
@jakehildebrand1824
@jakehildebrand1824 11 ай бұрын
​@@YourFriendlyOfficeAssistantA ramjet is significantly more complicated that a turbojet. Sure it may be a lot simpler, but its also a lot more complicated. Although, slapping a turbojet engine in front does make it significantly less complicated
@YourFriendlyOfficeAssistant
@YourFriendlyOfficeAssistant 11 ай бұрын
@@jakehildebrand1824 I did say in principle. In practice not so much.
@2nolhta
@2nolhta 11 ай бұрын
Even before 1913 ;) 'According to Arhur C. Clarke, Cyrano must be credited both for first applying the rocket to space travel and, for inventing the ramjet. Cyrano wrote: "I foresaw very well, that the vacuity that would happen in the icosahedron, by reason of the sunbeams, united by the concave glasses, would, to fill up the space, attract a great abundance of air, whereby my box would be carried up; and that proportionable as I mounted, the rushing wind that should force it through the hole, could not rise to the roof, but that furiously penetrating the machine, it must needs force it upon high." (from Greetings, Carbon-Based Bipeds by Arhur C. Clarke, 2000)'
@jakehildebrand1824
@jakehildebrand1824 11 ай бұрын
@@2nolhta theres a huge difference between having an idea for something, and inventing it.
@Twisted_utopia
@Twisted_utopia 11 ай бұрын
Always loved French jets. Especially the mirage series, flying since the 60s is one of the best designs for a fighter ever made. Check out all the low level flying vids the French air force made. Some of the coolest low level fighter jet vids
@chucku00
@chucku00 11 ай бұрын
Wanna check out a really good YT channel about French jet fighters? The _marine nationale_ (French navy) has its own channel named Chasse Embarquée and they produce insane videos.
@tonyz7216
@tonyz7216 11 ай бұрын
André Turcat became later the test pilot on Concorde's first flight.
@pelagic6
@pelagic6 Жыл бұрын
The French build good aircraft. Back in the 90's in my youth I was fortunate to fly on Concorde. Incredible experience.
@pbart9821
@pbart9821 Жыл бұрын
Nearly all British, the French completely took the piss
@rudyvinck1447
@rudyvinck1447 Жыл бұрын
@@pbart9821 like what ?, the engine ?, the airframe is mostly a french design base on the Super Caravelle
@pbart9821
@pbart9821 Жыл бұрын
@@rudyvinck1447 the engine is a rolls Royce unit, developed in the UK with some snecma influence in the shaft, that's it. The structure was only based upon the principal of the super caravelle, not the construction
@namename3130
@namename3130 Жыл бұрын
​@@rudyvinck1447british eind tunnel testing and concept selection
@rudyvinck1447
@rudyvinck1447 Жыл бұрын
@namename3130 I didn't mean to say that the English participation of the Concorde program was not valuable. But I'm annoying to read some silly comments dictated by chauvinism and try to transform the reality ( and by the way, im not French).
@fridaycaliforniaa236
@fridaycaliforniaa236 Жыл бұрын
My uncle worked on this project (I'm French btw ^^). He showed me some photos, the engine air intake was *huge* asf.
@KyrianLB
@KyrianLB Жыл бұрын
If you're interested, you can see this plane in France, in the Museum of Le Bourget Airport !
@haha30405_
@haha30405_ Жыл бұрын
Wow thanks I’ll go check it out when I go to france!
@TheMourningBlade
@TheMourningBlade 11 ай бұрын
Damn, I was these last Saturday and back then, I even did not know that this plane existed. I didn't see it in the museum.
@KyrianLB
@KyrianLB 11 ай бұрын
@@TheMourningBlade It's located in a circular hall with lots of French fighter planes pointing towards the middle of the room. The floor is painted with the French cockade.
@TheMourningBlade
@TheMourningBlade 11 ай бұрын
@@KyrianLB yea, I saw all the cool Mirages, Mysteres but that one eluded my attention.
@elizabethnilsson1815
@elizabethnilsson1815 11 ай бұрын
Thanks, Yes, I wish to see this plane. The French are very good to make planes
@andrewtheogre5971
@andrewtheogre5971 11 ай бұрын
“The French sought ‘new and exciting’ ways…” 😂
@tommynikon2283
@tommynikon2283 Жыл бұрын
This amazing aircraft reminds me of France's amazing air force.
@ConcernedviolentVigilant-tj8ny
@ConcernedviolentVigilant-tj8ny 7 ай бұрын
talk to world war soldiers, they never saw or met a frenchman
@thethirdman225
@thethirdman225 6 ай бұрын
@@ConcernedviolentVigilant-tj8ny Has anyone ever told you how little your opinion matters?
@v_a_cpr5564
@v_a_cpr5564 4 ай бұрын
​@@ConcernedviolentVigilant-tj8ny ask the Russians and Germans, Normandie-Niemen is still a reference there. And read about the first battle of France, you will be surprised to learn the fault lied mainly on antiquated landforces command.
@gandigooglegandigoogle7202
@gandigooglegandigoogle7202 11 ай бұрын
the French have always built the best planes....their engineers are very good, the only limitation is money, it is terribly expensive to develop planes. why do you think the Germans want to work with the French on the 6th generation aircraft project? it's to steal their technologies!
@TheFrenchscot
@TheFrenchscot 10 ай бұрын
And so they did, right before announcing that they are leaving the project.
@inwedavid6919
@inwedavid6919 Жыл бұрын
It was too advanced for the time but canard and delta wing where also visionnary of top aicraft of today. Material and alloy of the time where not up to the task. The ramjet is now used on French nuke missile for 40 years+ and being adopted every where with hypersonic race. France was so in advance but get bankrupted by WWII.
@matheuscarneirodacosta4804
@matheuscarneirodacosta4804 Жыл бұрын
France creating an engine the size of a ship and putting a cockpit over it
@altf5326
@altf5326 11 ай бұрын
Barnhouse tanks with questionable armor and armored cars with two drivers that can go top speed backwards.
@nuclearoven9792
@nuclearoven9792 Жыл бұрын
How goofy do you want your plane to look? The french: yes
@jeanbaumann5402
@jeanbaumann5402 11 ай бұрын
Oui*
@lolconer2
@lolconer2 Жыл бұрын
he really gone to the museum and seeing the nord and was like:You brother you are now my content
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained Жыл бұрын
Hahah it’s true I was there!
@AlexHalt100
@AlexHalt100 Жыл бұрын
so basically this thing actually had a "ludicrous speed" switch
@DoubleMonoLR
@DoubleMonoLR Жыл бұрын
The Blackbird SR-71 that was actually made and used for decades flew faster in actual flights anyway, so not really. There's also speculation that it could fly even faster than it's official top speed of mach 3.3, including a test pilot who claimed he reached mach 3.5.
@funkymen
@funkymen Жыл бұрын
This plane was the ancestor of Spaceball I
@AlexHalt100
@AlexHalt100 Жыл бұрын
@@DoubleMonoLR did you even watch the video to know what part im referring too? and was the SR71 around when this thing went took off? wasn't the damn point who the fastest was but that the narrator mentions that it had to get up to mach one and then the pilot hits the switch for the ram jet to get it up to mach 3. typical "AkShuAlLy" internet smartass.
@rob379lqz
@rob379lqz Жыл бұрын
I typically start with a chainsaw, then belt sander, then a plane. Seems the fastest.
@kyleday7452
@kyleday7452 Жыл бұрын
Ha! And all those metal shavings are are a real PITA!
@sharklegs
@sharklegs Жыл бұрын
the nord 5000 is so similar to the Mirage 2000 you need to do a video on this marvelous aircraft
@aterxter3437
@aterxter3437 Жыл бұрын
And also the first operating aircraft with a compound turbojet-ramjet engine. The issue at the time was that ramjets were not well-known. It was an on/off type instead of a throttleable engine like the turbojet, thus the french air force prefered the mirage III
@johnjephcote7636
@johnjephcote7636 Жыл бұрын
There was also the Sud-Ouest Trident SO 9000 with two turbojets and a rocket engine but frightening of all to me (at the time and since) was the Leduc 0.21 with just one ramjet so it had to be carried up and then released.
@willlook
@willlook Жыл бұрын
The LEDUC 022 had a turbojet so it could take off by itself
@talimartinez6707
@talimartinez6707 Жыл бұрын
Love your vids …I look forward to them each n every time.
@cyrille8693
@cyrille8693 11 ай бұрын
Thanks for your video. I'm french and never heard about those cute babies 'til now 😍
@frankmccann29
@frankmccann29 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. I was thinking about this design. Did not know France did this engineering gem.
@blitzzkrieg1400
@blitzzkrieg1400 Жыл бұрын
Mate, I hope you will also discuss the Saab Gripen someday. That Swedish jet deserves more love.
@adastra7939
@adastra7939 Жыл бұрын
What about the Draken?
@hollowsesh90
@hollowsesh90 Жыл бұрын
The Saab Draken is sweet, i. Like the avro vulcan too with its crazy howl that sounds like war of the worlds irl. All awesome planes, the gripen's tech is yet to be fully utilised but its agility shown already is crazy and it has big potential. 🫡
@madsteve9
@madsteve9 Жыл бұрын
Also, its predecessors the Viggen & Draken
@johnthefishermanjohnhoyle5763
@johnthefishermanjohnhoyle5763 Жыл бұрын
maaaate makes you sound lame like saddam khan of londonistan mayor.
@dessertauflan5273
@dessertauflan5273 Жыл бұрын
no
@ghostface6947
@ghostface6947 Жыл бұрын
New Found and Explained video!! Nice!
@exharkhun5605
@exharkhun5605 Жыл бұрын
As the saying in engeneering goes: The French copy no one and no one copies the French.
@JimforbesRitte
@JimforbesRitte 11 ай бұрын
Except for the mirages which are very close to the FD2 by Fairey…
@exharkhun5605
@exharkhun5605 11 ай бұрын
@@JimforbesRitte British engineering (of which I'm a great admirer) has it's own associated saying: The highest highs and the lowest lows. Fairey bucks the trend there too because they had some, although certainly not always by their own fault, astonishingly average designs. 😁
@nicolasdesigoyer6850
@nicolasdesigoyer6850 11 ай бұрын
Louis Vuitton would strongly disagree with that 😅
@exharkhun5605
@exharkhun5605 11 ай бұрын
@@nicolasdesigoyer6850 Ouch. You got me there. You're absolutely right, there may be 1 or 2 areas where the French way of doing things has gotten something more than local traction. 🙄
@deancorso4630
@deancorso4630 10 ай бұрын
No one copies the French ??? Hahaha... Look at Renault FT17, look at Buenos Aires Architecture and look at Tianducheng, in China for examples
@KuldarJ
@KuldarJ Жыл бұрын
"NAAAH, LET'S MAKE IT BIGGGGER" - The Best Doctor EVER!
@tonyz7216
@tonyz7216 11 ай бұрын
Griffon can still be seen at Le Bourget's Air and Space museum near Paris.
@CocoBirdo
@CocoBirdo 11 ай бұрын
It's so cool on how he says 'Guardian of the North'
@AaronShenghao
@AaronShenghao Жыл бұрын
Some corrections here: <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="45">0:45</a> and <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="520">8:40</a> Given the "turbofan" engine doesn't have any bypass with a fan around it, by definition it's a turbojet, not a turbofan. It’s the earlier type of jet engine available, the first turbofan military fighter came out much later, like the F-111. <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="387">6:27</a> And instead of “turbofan” you should say “…like a conventional Jet Engine…” It’s like calling crisps as “French fires”. Sure both are fried potato, but they are quite different. A jet engine does not use any compressor is called a “ramjet”, if the engine flow passes, it’s called “pulsejet”, if the internal flow is supersonic, it’s “scramjet”. A “turbojet” engine is a jet engine use a compressor (hence “turbo”) gas combusted by the engine to propel forward, the earliest and most basic type of jet engine. A “turbofan” is specifically for a turbojet engines with a ducted fan bypass; for fan without a surrounding duct, these are called “propfan”. If the turbojet engine is connected to a propeller, and the exhaust have almost no energy (don’t use exhaust jet as propulsion), then it’s called “turbo prop”. And if the turboprop is NOT connected to a propeller, instead connected to rotor blades or used like a conventional engine, then it’s called “turbo shaft engine”.
@martinquerre9614
@martinquerre9614 11 ай бұрын
The proper spelling is French "fries" - not "fires" !!😀😇
@deltavee2
@deltavee2 7 ай бұрын
@@martinquerre9614 Unless the cook is clumsy.
@ABrit-bt6ce
@ABrit-bt6ce Жыл бұрын
Mirage IV, if you have not gone there than please do.
@JTreguer
@JTreguer 10 ай бұрын
At this time in France, there was a popular proverb: "We don't have oil but we have ideas". A bygone era, unfortunately.
@dogelord7656
@dogelord7656 Жыл бұрын
I saw this plane at the museum of air and space in paris along with concorde
@franck.chataignier
@franck.chataignier Жыл бұрын
Toujours aussi bien expliqué pour le texte et réalisé pour l'animation vidéo.
@nicolek4076
@nicolek4076 11 ай бұрын
"The lack of power was exasperated." Was it? There's a name for this type of mistake - a malapropism. They're usually ludicrous, and this case is no exception.
@thethirdman225
@thethirdman225 6 ай бұрын
He means ‘exacerbated’.
@albertseabra9226
@albertseabra9226 Жыл бұрын
Vive la France et ses fantastique avions.
@Mo_Faiz7
@Mo_Faiz7 11 ай бұрын
For me, the Rafale and the F22 are the best
@paulmakinson1965
@paulmakinson1965 11 ай бұрын
The precursor in ramjet aircraft was René Leduc (Leduc 022). He built some really crazy prototypes. The Griffon borrowed many of Leduc's ideas.
@PIERRECLARY
@PIERRECLARY 10 ай бұрын
and the feffing nazis used the trickfor V1
@linkevan9613
@linkevan9613 11 ай бұрын
"You see that big ass nuclear reactor ?" "Yea why ?" "Put wings on it"
@manuelwenaud8231
@manuelwenaud8231 11 ай бұрын
La créativité des French, c'était quelque chose... Rhaaaa !
@julienvernier5141
@julienvernier5141 Жыл бұрын
Saw it at the Bourget Space and Air museum ! Vive la France !
@benfast3174
@benfast3174 Жыл бұрын
Earned the like just for the Doctor Who reference 😂😂 Well done, the story is also really interesting!
@Hurbie_53
@Hurbie_53 Жыл бұрын
As per usual a benchmark of freak plane animation and wtf aviation history 👍😊 How can one give you inspiration for another video because I may have one or two in mind who might apply to you that might fit 😉
@antoinelemoine9222
@antoinelemoine9222 Жыл бұрын
YES FINALLY, a video on the Griffon :D
@divvie
@divvie 5 ай бұрын
Just started subscribing. Great, in depth info, obviously painstakingly researched! Just one question? When you say exasperated, do you mean exacerbated?
@_TAGP
@_TAGP Жыл бұрын
Everyone: A engine built for a jet! France: A jet built for an engine.. Hon hon hon....
@swatbaker
@swatbaker 10 ай бұрын
"Ejection seat, for safety" *The Pilot Ejecting at Mach 3* : **Desintegrated**
@milolouis
@milolouis 11 ай бұрын
How mad that the Concorde went the same speed as the Nord Griffon 2 with passengers not strapped to an engine but sipping champagne at 60,000ft.
@robertoborsalino1855
@robertoborsalino1855 11 ай бұрын
French are the best in the world plane designer and builder. Dassaut aviation is a pioneer and still the best. But excellent quality has a cost and it is not easy to sell such plane. It isthe same with Rolls-Royce ,few are lucky to have it !
@dorsk84
@dorsk84 Жыл бұрын
This is something right out of Capt. Scarlett.
@brr8939
@brr8939 Жыл бұрын
Great video! I have one request, could you make a video on the McDonnell F101 Voodoo?
@anotherstupidrandom4240
@anotherstupidrandom4240 Жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="411">6:51</a> YOU MASSACRED THE CAMEMBERT! (Moreover if you put camembert in the oven you need to be arrested) For the rest it's a great video, I love how funny french planes look some times (I'm french)
@chibani-
@chibani- Жыл бұрын
Pardon? Le camembert roti au four (avec de l'ail ou du miel ) ca existe,de meme que les quiches a base de camembert ou de la fondue au camembert (rare ok mais ca existe) ou encore un gratin de pommes de terre et au camembert.
@jeromewagschal9485
@jeromewagschal9485 Жыл бұрын
Actually camembert roasted in the oven is quite good 🙂 personally I like it served with caramelized pears...
@anotherstupidrandom4240
@anotherstupidrandom4240 Жыл бұрын
@@chibani- je pensais qu'on utilisait plutôt du coulommiers 😅
@chibani-
@chibani- Жыл бұрын
@@anotherstupidrandom4240 faut bien choisir son camembert de preference au lait cru.
@Vok250
@Vok250 Жыл бұрын
Cold war era humans were building god damn 40k ork technology.
@atomic4650
@atomic4650 11 ай бұрын
French engineers do not get enough credit for how ingenious they are. Probably the greatest engineers alongside the Brits.
@deancorso4630
@deancorso4630 10 ай бұрын
The Brits engineers are French... Like Brunel haha
@v_a_cpr5564
@v_a_cpr5564 4 ай бұрын
​@@deancorso4630you can skip engineers, the Brits are French. That's their first colony which didn't end well😅
@Roman_22
@Roman_22 Жыл бұрын
Wow really nice editing
@Comm0ut
@Comm0ut 11 ай бұрын
A complete ramjet with the jet engine in front as a coaxial flow inducer is an interesting variation on afterburner/reheat that makes up for the then-primitive fuel controls and other jet engine tech.
@jerrylee7898
@jerrylee7898 Жыл бұрын
Loved the Dr. Who reference!
@linusvogel7769
@linusvogel7769 Жыл бұрын
Hey fae could you do an Video about the mbb firefly, please. ITS very unknown and it would be amazing to see it
@dextercochran4916
@dextercochran4916 Жыл бұрын
You gotta love NATO. Russia builds something that does something cool on paper, and NATO responds by building something that does something even better in real life.
@xtophgerard1169
@xtophgerard1169 11 ай бұрын
Feançe has not always been in NATO. Degaulle was no big fan of the English and Americans who treated him like a potential problem and kept him away of big meetings…. He had to impose himself but did not trust the Anglo saxons because of the way they mistreated him and wants to make of France a puppet country like Germany after ww2
@user-cr5tr8zt8e
@user-cr5tr8zt8e 11 ай бұрын
Ту-160 - бумажный самолет? Или МиГ-31? Может Кинжал - это только мультфильм? Или Ланцет - бумажный самолет? Мне кажется, что сейчас НАТО - бумажный тигр, что без армии США ничего не стоит. Хотя военные бюджеты стран НАТО в несколько раз больше военного бюджета России.
@steveshoemaker6347
@steveshoemaker6347 11 ай бұрын
AMAZING VIDEO....Thanks Shoe🇺🇸
@yellow6ird
@yellow6ird 11 ай бұрын
Love the quality animation 👌
@germanirish2
@germanirish2 Жыл бұрын
Big rear ends are popular these days too!😊
@castortoutnu
@castortoutnu 11 ай бұрын
"See this big engine over there ? - Yeah - How about we bolt wings on it ? *Bzzzz* *wrench* *Bzzzz* - Oh My God"
@javierrflores
@javierrflores 6 ай бұрын
Great content
@davids82605
@davids82605 Жыл бұрын
THANK YOU for this video :-) :-) :-)
@theconfederacyofindependen7268
@theconfederacyofindependen7268 11 ай бұрын
The SR-71 Blackbird has TurboRamjet Engines
@NickJaime
@NickJaime Жыл бұрын
Like the SR71. That plane had both engines in it. A regular and a ramjet. The regular was for lower altitudes and getting the plane up to speed for the ramjet to take over.
@DavidSiebert
@DavidSiebert Жыл бұрын
Seems like the UK could have tried the same idea using Lightning. Swap and Avon for a ramject and give it a shot.
@TimInertiatic
@TimInertiatic Жыл бұрын
Wiki suggests this maxed out at Mach 2.2. Where does the Mach 3 / faster than a Foxbat come from ?
@uingaeoc3905
@uingaeoc3905 Жыл бұрын
French Imagination.
@unocualqu1era
@unocualqu1era Жыл бұрын
It's the secret "white flag" mode to run away from enemies. Jokes aside, it's just theoretical. It's easy to claim a speed without actually reaching it. The difficult part comes from making it work in reality without the plane blowing apart or the engines melting.
@erolsen58
@erolsen58 Жыл бұрын
It looks like a small B-58 Hustler.
@rescue270
@rescue270 Жыл бұрын
It does, sort of... ...I have seen a B-58 in flight.
@e.h.4789
@e.h.4789 Жыл бұрын
It's not a jet with an engine, it's an engine with a jet 😂
@konekillerking
@konekillerking Жыл бұрын
71 days. That’s how long it held the speed record. Soon to be passed by the F-106 and F-4. They went into production. F-4, ended up around Mach 2.2. Sr-71/YF-12 used a similar concept, but it’s system incorporated in to one unit. Turbo fan by passed at high speed, then a ram jet effect employed. This allowed the system to be throttled up and down, instead of on and off. It also made Mach 3.5+ possible. As for the titanium, yea it’s expensive. But the real issue is that at the time of this project the Soviets controlled the majority of the raw resources for it. They, surprise, surprise wouldn’t sell it to the west. How the US obtained the titanium resources from the Soviets, is in itself out of a spy novel.
@ernstschloss8794
@ernstschloss8794 Жыл бұрын
It's still got the record, tough. :P And it was a beautiful-looking machine...
@Leonard7
@Leonard7 Жыл бұрын
well, even though the F-4's absolute speed record was achieved through water injection, there are accounts of standard service F-4s being tested (clen confing) in the artic having reached M 2.4, and the engines had thrust to go even further, just they would tear themselves and the whole plane apart.
@hennies9509
@hennies9509 Жыл бұрын
Thank South Africa for titanium and lots of material for your Nuclear Arsenal to make it go boom.
@macbomb
@macbomb Жыл бұрын
Yeah at about 55 seconds in he claims Mach 3... But it had a conventional dura-aluminum shin that would not survive those speeds.
@Justanotherconsumer
@Justanotherconsumer Жыл бұрын
Sounds like the plan for the XF-103, one of those “what if” planes that probably wouldn’t have been that impressive.
@jaypednekar
@jaypednekar 11 ай бұрын
Seems like F16 designers took some design inspiration from this jet.
@Plyrith
@Plyrith Жыл бұрын
This one is right on my birthday, time I was born and all
@stateservant
@stateservant Жыл бұрын
quicker than MiG 25 is very quick indeed
@RACECAR
@RACECAR 11 ай бұрын
I can only imagine the boom this thing made at that speed was immense (Earth shaking even, probably). Also, that video: "This one has spies, espionage and romance" so its bond film then?
@moodiuser
@moodiuser Жыл бұрын
Dang the newest wt premium looks crazy
@Killjoy294
@Killjoy294 11 ай бұрын
I’m pretty sure the same engine tech was/is being used in the sr72 featured in top gun maverick.
@jimspencer774
@jimspencer774 11 ай бұрын
I worry about that HUGE under-fuselage air scoop and all the FOD that it will suck up on those "grassy" airstrips.
@King_Dusty_Of_Pookytopia
@King_Dusty_Of_Pookytopia Жыл бұрын
The dual combined engine is making a comeback for hypersonic aircraft.
@madmax2069
@madmax2069 11 ай бұрын
The landing gear being that far forward looks like a "tail" strike waiting to happen.
@thethirdman225
@thethirdman225 6 ай бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="621">10:21</a> Andre Turcat (pron. Tur-Cah) was the first pilot to fly the Concorde. Shortly afterwards, British pilot Brian Trubshaw became the second. This was a quirk of the manufacturing process, where one was built in France and the other in Britain.
@uingaeoc3905
@uingaeoc3905 Жыл бұрын
In fact in never got to more than M2.2 which made the EE Lightning faster and in production and in service Mixed power plant designs were never practical. Same with the Saunders Roe SR53 and SR177.
@everypitchcounts4875
@everypitchcounts4875 Жыл бұрын
Can we get a video on the Lockheed X-7 with a Wright Aeronautical ramjet engine from the 1950s
@Herfinnur
@Herfinnur 8 ай бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="410">6:50</a> a 'Camo Bear' is either the cutest bear or the scariest
@justhouz
@justhouz Жыл бұрын
Nice and interesting video. If you want to know how to pronounce Dassault, it’s easy. Do not pronounce the L or the T. Imagine Da like the word yes in Russian and So, as in the English word.
@ajvanmarle
@ajvanmarle 11 ай бұрын
It was nowhere near as fast as the MiG-25. The top speed for the NG 1500 was about Mach 2.2. The idea that the Griffon III would reach Mach 3 was pure speculation.
@jeffslade1892
@jeffslade1892 Жыл бұрын
In practical terms "only" Mach 2.1. And then came the all-weather Mach 2 Lightning with its classified actual top speed and altitude. It was put into production and in squadron service in 1960 and the russians wet themselves. It could get on target fast and dive down like a peregrine on a pigeon. The russians had no answer. It was the Lightning that stopped the russians developing supersonic bombers, they would get shot down like a flock of doves before they even got into range of the SAMs. An advantage of the Lightning is it could and did also work transonic, Bears are slow. That's where the ramjet idea falls down, dead weight most of the time and wastes jet fuel. Lightnings were largely based in UK and W.Germany, the Luftwaffe were quite pissed off by only being given F-104. The french got the lovely Mirage, but as one french exchange pilot put it, the Lightning was like a Mirage with two jets. A lot of the french and british military research tech of that time went into the Concorde.
@MAR.LARKIN-YES-T
@MAR.LARKIN-YES-T Жыл бұрын
Nobody seems to be mentioning the British FD2 (Fairey Delta 2) which flew in the early Fifties and for a short while, held the World Airspeed Record before it was mothballed by the shortsighted British Government! Aren't they supposed to be on our side? After seeing and being impressed by the FD2, Marcel Dassault was inspired to develop the Mirage family of aircraft and actually admitted this. He also said he found it difficult to understand why the British did not take the FD2, develop it and put it into production as a delta wing supersonic fighter. So he did it! Btw, if you look at the cockpit and nose section of the Nord Griffon it is almost identical to that of the FD2!
@ejmproductions8198
@ejmproductions8198 Жыл бұрын
Is it's top speed still clasified - why would they do that. It is not in service
@ejmproductions8198
@ejmproductions8198 Жыл бұрын
@@MAR.LARKIN-YES-T Quick google search : The first flight of a delta wing aircraft took place in the United States at the Muroc AFB Flight Test Center on 18 September 1948. The aircraft, Convair No. 7002, Air Force S/N 46-682 and designated the XF-92A was piloted by Convair's Manager of Flight Research, E.D. “Sam” Shannon.
@jeffslade1892
@jeffslade1892 Жыл бұрын
@@ejmproductions8198 It is a bit odd. Each one had different performance, Mach 2.3 to Mach 2.6. Towards its end of life pilots were allowed to use up the airframe, edge of space altitudes. There's some anecdotal of pilots diving at Mach 5 without issue (a limiting factor would be the air intake pressure). I have not been able to find a maximum Mach number (do not exceed) for the airframe, it's like it didn't have one. I did find a max 9g, but could a pilot even that even in the g-suit.
@jeffslade1892
@jeffslade1892 Жыл бұрын
@@MAR.LARKIN-YES-T The Fairey Delta was an experimental never intended for production. It was used to develop the delta that went onto Vulcan and Concorde et al. The french did not steal the the data, it was shared with them. Politicians then as now are a nuisance. Fortunately I ever only met a few ministry mandarins, they haven't got a clue with science&tech, you have to explain like to children, and then repeat everything.
@cech-yavesh
@cech-yavesh Жыл бұрын
You can see this marvel @ le Musée du Bourget (where Lindbergh landed).
@MrSebfrench76
@MrSebfrench76 Жыл бұрын
I am french. I don't give a shit about this plane. I am just here for reading the comments, and gosh, i am delighted. Just like for each french plane, you are all shitting on it.
@COMPLAINS_NOT_CHANGE_ANYTHING
@COMPLAINS_NOT_CHANGE_ANYTHING 11 ай бұрын
Father of Typhoon,Mirage and Rafale
@christianbarstad923
@christianbarstad923 Жыл бұрын
Please do the saab viggen man!
@holgermuller3597
@holgermuller3597 11 ай бұрын
Without the canards the cockpit would blew away! Such a Monster
@afham_farooqui
@afham_farooqui 7 ай бұрын
how have i never herd of this before
@yaoyichenvictoriasch7014
@yaoyichenvictoriasch7014 11 ай бұрын
The Su-57 next, please!
Did Australia invent the world's best fighter jet?
15:20
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 509 М.
Why the futuristic B-58 was useless before it even took to the sky...
30:52
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 960 М.
A little girl was shy at her first ballet lesson #shorts
00:35
Fabiosa Animated
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН
ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО СОВЕРШАЙТЕ ДОБРО!❤❤❤
00:45
A teacher captured the cutest moment at the nursery #shorts
00:33
Fabiosa Stories
Рет қаралды 55 МЛН
Did Russia build the best attack helicopter ever?
19:02
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 876 М.
The Dassault Rafale: The Plane that Beat the F-16
18:50
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 448 М.
Germany's Top 10 UGLIEST Aircraft
23:38
Rex's Hangar
Рет қаралды 185 М.
The fighter jet that was 'too fast' - The French Leduc 022
12:03
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 588 М.
The Nazi space shuttle made to win WW2...
14:12
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 361 М.
The British Jet that was faster than anything ever built... the Vickers 559
13:21
Why the EU is About to Impose a Hard Border in Gibraltar
9:42
TLDR News
Рет қаралды 590 М.
The Saab 35 Draken: The Groundbreaking Fighter Nobody Talks About
22:33
How Russia built a stealth jet to beat the west - Su-57
21:53
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 737 М.
Star Raker! - The Giant Insane Mach 7.2 Space Plane
20:48
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН