Getting one in mint condition with a battery grip and 5 batteries for $630

@@sydbailey1320 Great deal! Enjoy. Mask On Nurse Marty (Ret)

You are welcome, Stephen!

Is X-H1 drain the battery drastically?

@@db511 either way you should get more than one battery, the battery isn’t the best if you’re going to shoot and video all day f

@@err7273 thank you i just own my x-h1, i love this camera

@@db511 just gotta get the grip and now you have 3 batteries.

@@rumporridge1 thank you for the tips, but after the new update i rarely need to use the grip, i feel my x-h1 more efficient now

Dante Corbett I'm holding for the upcoming Nikon mirror less. (I use both Nikon and Fuji) . I'll make my decision then. What's your owner opinion on the AF speed for photography, and the AF tracking for video? How's the low light performance, namely in photos? So far...it's the batteries that are holding me back. And it's just to close to the Sony €€€ wise.. If it was under 2k Euros with Grip included..... Do you come from Fuji, or another brand, before getting the X-H1 ? Thanks. ;)

aww, stop it! That's very sweet. Ok, carry on… haha

Sehr gern! Willkommen!

you are welcome and thank you very much!

Yes, I'm glad Fuji delivers. That's what makes them such a great company.

Really the 90mm can go below 1/60 with ibis? I own 90mm and it's PITA to shoot in lowlight due to shutterspeed

filos photoworks yea! For me, it’s motion blur that I have to watch out for now because I can go as low as 1/30 and still get sharp images

@@joshblck1 well, it's a game changer. I really miss my 56 1.2 due to lowlight capabilities, now I at least can do lowlight shoots better. Thx a lot

It's like considering the xt4 or the xh1+800$, it depends on what you need. Personally, i'd take the xh1+56 or 90mm over that xt4 body any day but not everyone is me

Bugs have been sorted in the meantime, even the IBIS glitches have been addressed by Fujifilm. No need to wait any more :)

Agreed! I was a bit reluctant at watching +30 minute review but it was excellent!

Lukas Trnobransky p

Thanks Lee! My guess is that higher dynamic range takes its toll on getting the maximum out of the sensor and therefore the processing might be affected, becoming slower in terms of actually computing the image thats coming in. Fujifilm just announced a first software update for the X-H1. Not addressing the AF bugs just yet, though. Nevertheless I like how they at least do care about updating. Even bringing new life to older models from time to time as you know. Saw your first impression video of the X-H1, did you end up getting one for yourself?

two of my favourite youtubers right here. please do a collaboration guys!:)

Evidently Something Yes I bought one. I’ve been using it now since it came out and everything on the photo side is Just awesome! (except how soft my shutter button is compared to my friends xh1) As for video I’m not really as impressed. The ibis is to erratic and janky for me to want to use it. The autofocus in video is also erratic and never works in same way twice so you can’t even predict its behaviour. I’d rather shoot with it off as it looks unnatural. I do like the linear manual focusing though. And I plan to try out some follow focus on it in the near future. Obviously Fuji will fix some of the issues with firmware but I feel like it might have been rushed to market a little early.

I agree, Lee...thiis is an excellent, real-world focused review. It's honest, candid, accurate and provides potential buyers with *insight* as ot whether it would meet their needs.

Some KZfaqrs report worse auto focus on Sony cameras with S-log. I don't think the RAW sensor data is used for the auto-focus. There's a LOT of data coming from the RAW sensor. Sony's downsample 6K to 4K and each pixel has 12bits, just imagine that data rate if it was RAW! AF processors can't handle that much data. I think image pipeline works kind of like this: RAW sensor data -> Picture profile processor -> AF processor I think the AF processor is quite weak, as its mostly software based. Software based systems are what makes things like eye AF possible. Eye AF would be exponentially harder with a hardware based processor. The picture profile processor conforms the RAW data into a smaller colour space set by the picture profile settings. It'll apply ISO gain, gamma curves, colour matrices and force it into 8-10bit. If the AF processor taps into the output of that, then obviously the AF processor will be working with different data. If AF processor doesn't tweak detection thresholds based on picture profile settings then low contrast profiles will obviously make it harder. You could make the AF processor tap into its own picture profile processor but it would add complexity.