now go apply all those techniques you just learned to ISS and NASA space footage, bcs they're using the same tricks

@@outlawedTV88 As vfx artist, I did. And the result was it was impossible to fake even with modern technology. I mean who would go as far as animating a single strand of hair free floating in the background? That single hair alone takes too long to imperfectly mimic.

Definitely because they were practical affects and not cgi.

@@caelestigladii If you think its impossible to fake the space footage and videos than you my friend have no idea whatsoever. I've done this over 50 years! and believe me they're all fake. No real photo of Earth from the space and so many other stuff

Yah you'd have to look for it very carefully. Plus with computers if they wanted to they could fix those small details.

You're just that good :)

Is it bad that I’m haunted by this scene each and everytime I’m hold grocery bags thinking they will just drop out as I’m walking?!?! Hahah 😅

@Fraser Kerr :) haha "Why is it that there's always someone who brings eggs and tomatoes to a speech?" :)

Show off

@Fraser Kerr :)

An amazing job.. They sold everything they did..

Yah not like actors today they suck compared to old school actors but that's due to Hollywood trading talent for political views for there leftist agenda or BLM crap.

Right.. imagine trying to make a classic look bad..and of all movies and time of year to pick..

@@SpaceRanger187 This video didn't make it look bad. If anything it's impressive knowing how the practical effects work. The video makes it clear this is only stuff you would see going frame by frame.

Now its all CGI crap

@@Crusader1984 Agreed, I'd take practical effects all day, every day. CGI is way out of hand today, directors use it for the most basic shots and everything looks either too perfect or too fake now.

Well I mean it's not like they planned for the future. Look old CGI on HD tv and it looks really bad since it was rendered for low quality screens. Also another thing you'll notice on HD is when actors slow down there movements cause old cameras couldn't handle fast motion. It was such a pain doing that in film class or acting in front of a camera class. You had to even practice slow blinks.

And that’s the beauty of it. These guys just ruin movies

Read books.

That's one of the things I always noticed since being older

Plus they'd be way to heavy for a scrappy kid like Kevin to carry home alone. Lol see what I did there 🤣

Aren't parents the worst when watching films

@@sw1000xg My mom's a nurse and she can always point out when a baby in a movie is just born that the baby is actually about five weeks old.

@@bradleymayse You don't have to be a nurse to notice that.

Van has a clutch fan, doesn't engage in reverse 🙏🏻

@@BariLopesh Yes it does silly...and if so then explain to me how the clutch fan knows when the vehicle is in reverse compared to in forward gear?

@@hoofarted8709 The same way a clutch knows of your going forward or backward

@@BariLopesh ...its not the same type of clutch as in a trans mission...are you trolling me?...im actually trying to be nice...a mechanical cooling fan is connected to the front of the water pump witch is connected to the front of the engine...the water pump has a pully connected to it and the accessory belt drives the pump...the mechanical fan and fan clutch is connected to a shaft that is connected to the water pump pully...the fan itself is connected to the fan clutch witch is actually a thermal bearing and when heat is absorbed from the engine into the water pump and through the water pump pully shaft and into the thermal activated fan clutch then the fan will start to move and draw air through the grill and into the radiator so that it can cool the engine and it doesnt mater if you are driving backwards or forwards...just ask your dad or google it:)

@@BariLopesh you do realize the clutch on the fan and a transmission clutch literally only spin one way

Yah it's very educational if you want to make a low budget film yourself you can use old school effects.

Exactly what I clicked on the video to say myself from the title and cover shot.

I think he simply meant it in a rhetorical sense of 'how could the scarf possibly do that with the car moving toward him', but of course the simple explanation is that the car wasn't coming torward him and the scene was just shot in reverse with the van pulling away.

Turn it around and it still pulls air not as efficiently. You need a reverse pattern blade twist

You cant use "engine fan moves scarf" as clickbait though

Actually they are different. I checked

@@TheAaronmcmahon11 90% are on IMDB trivia, and 10% other YT videos.

caught in 4k

Agreed predator and the first alien films are just freaking amazing cause of the expensive effects. Chi crap just stands out way too much and still looks super fake.

The problem with 20th century CGI, it was state of the art then and looked fine. FF 25 years and our TVs are all very high definition and it really makes 1st gen CGI look horrible. Plus people are spoiled now. Watch Babylon 5, you'll see what I mean.

@@tstahler5420 Couldn't tell it in 480p but that 4K definition shows everything..

Yeah that particular part gets on my nerves.

It was real. Joe Pesci suffered 3rd degree burns doing that scene. Google it.

20 digital artists if they want it to look good. But if they want it to be cheap they hire 2 and buy them a bag of energy drinks. And ten minutes before the deadline the director walks in again and says he wants an orange instead of an apple to fall out of the bag.

@@QueenOfDarknes5 no kidding 🤣

Same for me. That audio commentary is great. I also love knowing every single detail behind my favorite movies. That’s why I am a sucker for DVDs and Blu-Rays because they contain bonus material.

@@CedricsSpecialLP I was the same way until streaming services came along. Now I only get the Blu-Ray copy for my absolute favorite films. Some films do contain bonus material (depending on the streaming service) but they can be limited, and there’s only so many films/franchises I’m willing to waste hours jumping through hoops on the internet/KZfaq to find every piece of behind-the-scenes info I can get my hands on, if you know what I mean

exactly lol.

Crazy how it could almost be considered a 80's film since it still has those vibes and was released in 1990

It really is. I was an extra in Above Suspicion, starring Emilia Clarke. We filmed a courtroom scene in which she testifies against the defendant (I was one of his attorneys) on the witness stand. Though the screen time for that scene is short, it was interesting to see how many angles, perspectives, lens and filter changes go into the making of just one scene.

this is no magnetic scarf. they shot the scene backwards... i mean, the car stands near kevin and drove back... the scarf stuck in the car. the scene was then showed backwards in the movie, so it looks like the car drives toward kevin.

Yeah or if the driver accidentally had the car in drive, not reverse.