FURY (2014) is FURIOUSLY GOOD!! First Time Watching MOVIE REACTION!

Рет қаралды 7,105

7 ай бұрын

Patreon: / shreenation
Buy Me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/shreenation
Become A Channel Member: / @shreenation
Visit shreenation.com for Video Creator Lessons!
Second Channel: / @shreenation2
Edited by ‪@internetphilosopher01‬ and ‪@ShreeNation‬
Podcast:
open.spotify.com/show/7kAigDo...
Movie Reviews:
/ @shreenation2
✨My Socials!✨
Instagram: / shreenation
Facebook: / theshreenation
Reddit: / shreenation
Binge my stuff:
Lessons in Stories: • Reviews - Shree Nation
Personal Stories: • StoryTime - Shree Nation
Reacting to Stories: • Movie Reactions - Shre...
Original movie: Fury (2014)
This video is for commentary and criticism only and is not a replacement for watching Fury (2014)
Is there something you would like to see? Leave a request in the comments below! ↓
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. No copyright infringement is intended. Our videos are for commentary and criticism ONLY and are not a replacement for watching the original release.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This post may contain affiliate links. If you use one of these links to buy something we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Thanks!
#ShreeNation #FirstTimeWatching #MovieReaction

Пікірлер: 90

@ShreeNation 4 ай бұрын

More fun videos here: Movie Reactions: kzfaq.info/sun/PLBe9hlLWd_RnTzXsXPs3PX9ZLvVAN07aE Categorized Playlists: www.youtube.com/@ShreeNation/playlists

@douglascampbell9809 7 ай бұрын

The Fury tank was the only thing standing between the SS regiment and the American rear area. The rear would have been filled with wounded and a lot of soldiers like Norman at the start of the film. Fury had orders to keep the rear area safe. This isn't about not being smart. It's about following orders even if it get's you killed.

@brianwilson9206 6 ай бұрын

A disabled tank without infantry support facing an infantry battalion armed with RPGs (panzrfaust)? This ends badly and quickly for the tank with minimal casualties for the battalion…

@Keyndoriel 2 ай бұрын

@@brianwilson9206 I'm reminded of the dentist machine gunner who killed hundreds of soldiers before passing on. It's possible if that is

@Keyndoriel 2 ай бұрын

Wardaddy also lost his wife and child while fighting. Fury was his home, he had nothing left, and with the amount of PTSD they all had with the lack of treatment. Normans got all that PTSD and survivors guilt. I very much doubt he would have let himself continue living after getting back home.

@markcreemore4915 7 ай бұрын

In the spring of 1945 the Easy Eight Sherman would easily have been able to take out a Tiger at well over a kilometer, even facing frontward. The range at which that tank duel occurred was ridiculous.

@brianwilson9206 7 ай бұрын

Also “fury” would have been the first tank killed by the Tiger exactly for that reason.

@thejamppa 7 ай бұрын

In theory yes. All 76mm HVAP ammunitions were distributed Tank Destroyer batallions first so M10's got them first. Sherman's got them after U.S. Forces reached Rhein river. 76mm was even regular ammo true challenge for Tiger 1 from Side or Rear and theory could in 100 yards penetrate weak point of frontal armor (drivers window). Reason why in attack against Tiger they pincered Tiger. Too bad they Made Tiger commander brain dead as any regular Tiger 1 commander would have reversed in that situation.

@BoofMaster9000 7 ай бұрын

Nah bruh, it's a well known fact that tigers were the most powerful tanks of WWII. They could take on Shermans no prob, the range was wild tho so I agree with the fact that duel was waaayyyyy off

@lazyperfectionist1 7 ай бұрын

16:13 "Tanks are so strong, they're kind of _used_ as, like, a _shield_ by everybody else." That was their original _purpose._ The stalemate that history has come to call "No-Man's Land" that existed between opposing trenches in the _First_ World War was a stalemate that existed because infantry and cavalry forces from neither side could successfully _cross_ that field to lay siege to positions on the other _side._ Every single soldier was always mowed down by opposing, enemy _machine-gun_ fire. This lead to a stalemate that existed until one side developed the tank. The first tanks were not light. They were not fast. But they didn't need to be. All they needed was the ability to cross No-Man's Land through the ensuing hail of bullets to take out opposing _machine_ gun positions on the other side and open the door for a charge by _infantry._

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Wow! Thanks for letting me know!

@bwilliams463 7 ай бұрын

Norman very well could've been 17; that was the minimum age at which you could join the military in WW2 (with parental consent). At this point in the war, the minimum draft age was 18. The 'lasers' were tracer rounds. Every 5th bullet in a machine gun belt carried a small piece of magnesium that would ignite when it was fired. The resulting luminous trails could be used to tell where your shots were going and adjust aim accordingly. And the different warring factions in WW2 did use different colors of tracers than each other so they would know if the shots they were tracking were their own. The German Tiger was arguably the most-feared tank of the war. Heavily-armored with an absolutely lethal main gun, the only chance American Sherman tanks had originally was to get within insanely close range and shoot them from the rear, where the armour was thinnest. Fury is a later-model Sherman, though, and is equipped with a much-more-powerful gun that could actually take on a Tiger from the front - not the only example of a technical inaccuracy in the film. The Tiger in this film is Tiger 131, which is currently the only fully-operational Tiger tank left in the world. Just FYI: The Indian army fielded tank units of their own in WW2, equipped with British and (later) American tanks. I haven't found much information about them, though. It is odd that the copy of the movie you watched had no subtitles for the German speech. When Emma's cousin moves to stop her from going in the bedroom with Norman, Don tells her to let them go, because 'They're young. And they're alive.'

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Thank you for explaining ❤

@undergroundwarrior70 7 ай бұрын

The American Sherman Tanks were smaller, not heavily armored like the German Tiger/Panzer Tanks which they were also much larger in size. Also American Sherman Tanks ran on gasoline, and the German Tiger/Panzer Tanks ran on diesel which it lasted a lot more longer to run on than gasoline. Yes, the Germans were ahead with their engineering in many aspects. Just before the end of WWII the Germans had jet fighters in the skies, but they were not perfected at that time. Great reaction to the film 'Fury' Sheree. Also your English is very impeccable for not growing up in America or in England. When you speak English sounds like you were educated here in America. Much better than mine I would say. Also please do a reaction to the WWII 1943 film 'Sahara' with Humphrey Bogart and to the WWII 1970 film 'Patton' with George C. Scott if you can. Both are excellent films.

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Thank you for the recommendations 🖤🙏

@undergroundwarrior70 7 ай бұрын

@@ShreeNation You are very welcome. I do hope you will be able to do your reactions to both of those films. The other one is the WWII 1969 film (which I forgot to mention) is 'The Battle of Britain' which I did see at the theater when first released when I was 13 years old. Also an excellent WWII film with authentic WWII airplanes, and no special effects during air battle, and an excellent all British cast.

@BogeyDopeYT 7 ай бұрын

In military service, duty is paramount. The preservation of your own life is not priority. If your duty is to hold the crossroad, you hold it or die trying. As Spiers said in BoB, accept the fact that you’re already dead, then you can function as a soldier. Stupid has nothing to do with it.

@e.d.2096 7 ай бұрын

My absolute favorite WWII tank film! Brad Pitt ìs excellent in his role as a tank commander. In this era of tank warfare, it was really quantity vs. quality. They had superior tanks, we had more. That fact is portrayed very well in this film. Exceptional choice Shree! If I may, there is a western ' Quigley Down Under ' Tom Selleck starring in a role, as good as Brad Pitt's character in this film. IMO.😊

@tomhoffman4330 7 ай бұрын

Hey...What's Up, My fellow Night-Owl! (LOL)

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Hope you have fun watching 😍

@bwilliams463 7 ай бұрын

I endorse 'Quigley,' too.

@_lynx_8632 6 ай бұрын

If you want to see the other side of war give "Das Boot" a try. Its about the crew of a german submarine and was made in 1981. Awesome thing about it is you feel your part of the crew!

@ShreeNation 6 ай бұрын

I can't wait 😍

@_lynx_8632 6 ай бұрын

@@ShreeNation if you do it, small advice, watch it in german with subtitles and the directors cut.

@ShreeNation 6 ай бұрын

Thank you for the heads up ✌

@JamesGilburt-lb7sg 7 ай бұрын

Hi Shree, I highly recommend Kelly's Heroes (1970) starring Clint Eastwood, Telly Savlas & Donald Sutherland. It has vibes of this movie + saving private ryan. Please react to it asap, it's awesome! It's based in the aftermath of D-Day, about a platoon of American soldiers who use a break from fighting to go after millions of dollars worth of Nazi gold hidden behind enemy lines.

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Thank you for the recommendation! ✌

@JamesGilburt-lb7sg 7 ай бұрын

@ShreeNation You're welcome 👍🏻 I like your reactions and I'm subscribed 😊

@bwilliams463 7 ай бұрын

I also endorse 'Kelly's Heroes.'

@stevenlurati3691 7 ай бұрын

Kelly's is great!! They actually do a good job explaining why the early Sherman's were outmatched. Who can forget the paint shot 😂

@kingscorpion7346 7 ай бұрын

that was the movie that made me fall in love with the Sherman since childhood!

@philmullineaux5405 7 ай бұрын

This movie puts u in Norman's shoes, and takes u on his arc! Germany had much better equipment than the allies. Better handguns, the had even AK style rifles, but not yet mass produced, better shoulder fired rockets, better tanks better planes. If they hadnt attacked Russia, and if the americans hadn't won the battle of the Bulge, no way we win this war. Because they already had drone planes, drone rockets, were already working on mass producing jet fighters, and would have been nuclear by the end of 45. Sadly, Norman's prediction for Emma came true. best job i ever had means, i love u guys. Norman played the child in the great remake movie,3.10 to Yuma!! sort of based on a true story, the last battle. Type in here, Audie Murphy in WW2!

@lazyperfectionist1 7 ай бұрын

This movie showcases, I think quite accurately, just _how_ much loss one of our tank crews in WWII experienced. The tanks from Germany were superior to tanks from the US in _every_ way except one. They were _bigger,_ they were _tougher,_ they could fire a larger-caliber _shell_ at a target further _away,_ but tanks from the US could be manufactured a _hell_ of a lot faster, and we _capitalized_ on that. Was a single German tank a match for a single American tank? Indisputably. Was it a match for _two?_ Probably. Was it a match for _three?_ Well, it depends on the circumstances. But was it a match for four? No. So the US had to use the most _extraordinary_ care in making sure they had vast _numerical_ superiority before they _went_ anywhere. Wars are hard. And I don't just mean they're strenuous. I mean, they take a _bloody_ toll on whoever fights them. They're the _last_ thing in the world you want to get good at, because basically, that means getting good at losing people you're in _charge_ of. You see these guys endure devasting loss after devastating loss. But you also hear about how this particular tank and its crew have been a part of successful efforts to drive the Germans back from _one_ theater of war after _another,_ so now, the only place the German war effort continues is within _Germany._ They've been defeated everywhere else.

@lazyperfectionist1 7 ай бұрын

14:03 All too often, _this_ is what death is like in a war zone. It's not like a piece captured off a chessboard (there one minute, gone the next). It's _agony._

@sike2399 28 күн бұрын

Apart from quantity, American Sherman medium tanks were able to outclass German heavy tanks in a few other ways too: throughout all German tank production engineers had a bad habit of focusing on hard factors like speed, firepower & armor while neglecting equally important soft factors like ergonomics, reliability, ease of maintenance, etc. Almost as many German tanks were put out of action by technical breakdowns that the tank crews couldn't feasibly repair in the field as they were by combat and fuel shortages. They had a tendency to over-engineer their hardware making them easy to break and difficult to repair. That's why it made sense for 3 Shermans to take on a Tiger tank despite the fact that their main guns couldn't penetrate the armor; Tiger tanks in particular were known to be vulnerable to losing their entire internal electrical system when the tank took a hit in the right place, whether the round penetrated or not. M4 Sherman designers took these soft factors into account to create tanks that were comparatively simple, reliable, roomy and easy to maintain and repair. They were under-gunned and under-armored compared to German tanks because Shermans were designed for infantry support roles while the Panther, Tiger & Tiger II's were designed with tank warfare in mind. The U.S. didn't share Hitler's obsession with constantly squandering time and resources to create newer and more powerful wonder weapons year by year, so instead they settled on a Good Enough medium tank that was versatile enough to operate in all theaters with a chassis that could easily accept field upgrades like thicker armor plating and more powerful guns. This "tactics over technology"-mentality kept production of more tanks proceeding uninterrupted whereas Germany kept sabotaging their own industry by trying to outclass whatever bigger, tougher tanks they encountered in the field.

@brianwilson9206 7 ай бұрын

That tank was the famous Tiger tank pzkw VI a . A German heavy tank with lots of armor and a big bad 88mm cannon. The weakest part of a tank is its rear.

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

I see, thank you for explaining :)

@douglascampbell9809 7 ай бұрын

@@ShreeNation Specifically it's Tiger 131, the only surviving functional Tiger tank in the world. It lives along with the Fury Sherman tank at the Bovington Tank Museum in Great Britain. I've seen a picture of one with about 40 shell pockmarks from incoming fire. I've also seen pictures of Michael Wittmann Tiger with 117 soviet tank kill rings on it's barrel. No bones about it in flat open county terrifying.

@brianwilson9206 7 ай бұрын

@@douglascampbell9809 the only reason to watch this movie. The tactics for this movie are horrible. Could have been a great movie if somebody with a brain sat down and thought this one out.

@bulgariannationalist5719 7 ай бұрын

That light bullets are tracer rounds, every fifth round is tracer,like marker where you shoot..

@Yezhanium 7 ай бұрын

As Norman is checking out the insides of the tank, you can actually see a silvery cross with a blue neck ribbon. It's the "Hero Mother" award, for giving birth to 5+ children. Imagine now *_how_* could they get a hold of that one? Also, it was based on a real story, but in the end it was JUST ONE GUY, telling his crew to leave, who had to use cannon, machine gun, submachine gun, pistol and then resort to grenades. Nazis were like 'F that' and just went around him for good. Sidenote, still hoping to see Soldier 1998 :3 So I could recommend more awesome movies :D

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Thank you ❤😊

@JacobSantillan 7 ай бұрын

I'm so glad you reacted to this. I saw it four times in the cinema -- I've never done that before.

@tsmartin 7 ай бұрын

3:21 That is being done even today in a country that shall remain nameless.

@adampare8088 5 ай бұрын

STOOOOOP! What are you doing?!

@harvey4512 Ай бұрын

I Don't Understand How alot people saying this film was overrated when it came out. It Maybe Unrealistic and saying about Brad Pitts acting but it was good

@davidmeir9348 7 ай бұрын

In the IDF I was in the infantry brigade Golani and in Golani we have what is called Achzarit (feminine form of cruel). It's a troop ground transport that basically is a replica of the Russian T54 (and T55) tank but without the turret. So it's like the body of a tank that is use to transport troops in various terrain and instead of a turret there is a Mag with 7.62 mm bullets. You can fit up to half a dozens guys in it and I've done exercises where I was almost 48 hours in the fucking thing. I can assure you, when you come out of it, your ass hurts like a motherfucker. So yeah, I know what it's like to be for extended periods of time inside a tank and it's not easy. Great war film btw and Brad Pitt is, as always superb.

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Thank you for letting me know ❤

@braxtonmoore9246 6 ай бұрын

Honestly you’re training just kicks in. Think to yourself “just do your job. Just do your job”

@thejamppa 7 ай бұрын

This was absolutely amazing film first half. Second half went into Mary-Sue superhero story... But apparent bs fight that was final fight and appareantly German's got major downgrade in level in second half and Shermans actually got ability to bounce 75mm pak 40's ammo's (which singe gun could make 12-16 shots a minute per gun but during assault they made less than 5 shots per 3 guns)... This is still one the best tank films made in WWII. I just wish they would have kept the realism of first half also in second half aswell. But yeah. Tigerphobia was real thing in allies. They carpetbombed every barn even rumor running there were Tigers near by. I agree n ' Quigley Down Under ' with Tom Selleck. Its underrated western.

@JacobSantillan 7 ай бұрын

41:25 Best job I ever had. I mean that.

@marqueonmauldin9095 7 ай бұрын

Most German soldiers didn’t want to fight in that war but didn’t want to be killed if they refused

@lazyperfectionist1 7 ай бұрын

Your experience, I cannot speak to. In the US, we tend to struggle with history, _I_ suspect, because it's taught as a dull, lifeless list of names and dates instead of being taught as the _immersive, epic narrative_ it was for people who actually lived _through_ it. But, you know, you may like this list of documentaries you can find on YT called _WWII: The Complete History._ First, the title is a bit misleading. _No_ account of that war that is simple enough for a _single_ person to understand could _ever_ truly be described as "complete," but it's a good, overall narrative. Second, although it's a good effort, there are places where the _editing_ could've been done better. There's a stretch where the background music drowns out the narrator, and at the end of one episode, the sound dies altogether. 🤷 Third, there are only two _factual_ details they got wrong, as far as I've noticed. For one, December 7, 1941, is when war broke out between the US and Japan _only._ War between the US and Germany and Italy did not start until four days later. The documentary said they all happened the same day. 🤷 For another, the senior General in charge of the Japanese war machine was _Hideki_ Tojo. For some reason, the documentary pronounced it "_Eye_ de kai." 🤷 But let me give you _these_ tips, if you decide to watch it. First, it has thirteen chapters, but it's absolutely _not_ something to marathon. One episode a day. That's it. Give each chapter a chance to process. Second, while you watch it, keep a piece of paper and a pen handy (absolutely _not_ a word processor). The first time they mention the name of a _person_ or a _battle,_ pause the video long enough to jot that down. Don't worry about any _other_ information; just get the name. Otherwise, though, consider it recommended.

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Thank you so much for your recommendation! I'll remember to watch it carefully and take notes 📝

@tomhoffman4330 7 ай бұрын

👋Hey Shree!🥰I've been waiting for this one to Upload, should be one Helluva Ride: "Tanks for the Memories!" 😎👍 I've also got a Special Recommendation to go-along with this one today...another Lost Gem from My Childhood: the Movie is literally called "Tank" from 1984! It's about an Army Soldier (played by the Late-&-Great James Garner) who goes to War against an abusive Sheriff. Both of these Movies use the same WW2 Sherman Tanks, so I Hope that You'll check-it-out for Me...Please?!?!🙏😉

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Tank sounds like an awesome film! Thanks for the recommendation, will check it out 😍 Hope you enjoy the show today!

@bwilliams463 7 ай бұрын

I remember when 'Tank' came out, I was so excited. It was gonna be about a tank! It was gonna blow things up and crush things! The perfect movie! And y'know what? It delivered on every level.

@tomhoffman4330 7 ай бұрын

@@bwilliams463 Thanks for Your Support.👍

@edgardofernandez7511 6 ай бұрын

USA sherman tanks were medium strength in armor n weapon gun they were no match for a Nazi German panther medium tank n a tiger heavy tank there armor n weapon gun were thicker n stronger n powerful from the front but there rear was weak n a better place to fire the main gun of the USA meddium tanks that they had over whelming numbers of them compared to the Nazi German medium n heavy tanks they didn't make to many of them because of fuel shortages n parts to fix them n materials to make the tanks

@rejeangadbois3123 5 ай бұрын

it's 100mm+ or rolled steel angled at 15 degrees.

@koragg3399 7 ай бұрын

Hey check out Max Manus 2008 about the Norwegian war hero and resistance fighter

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Will do, thank you ❤

@tomhoffman4330 7 ай бұрын

Thanks for hanging-out with Us today, Hope to see you again...👍

@reecegraves3738 7 ай бұрын

Probably the best war movie ever made imo.

@lamontwilliams4172 7 ай бұрын

Happy veterans Day

@Spawnofktulu007 7 ай бұрын

Just found your channel! Love the reactions! Want something that breaks your heart and is action packed? I have to comb your videos and see all the content you've made but 10 for 10 can recommend Attack on Titan if you're into or interested in diving into anime.

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Thank you for the recommendation 😇

@rejeangadbois3123 3 ай бұрын

It's not teeth it's tracks.

@bernardsalvatore1929 7 ай бұрын

IT'S INTERESTING THAT YOU COMMENTED ON SHIA LABEOUF'S EYES LOOKING GENUINELY TIRED!! FROM WHAT I HAVE SEEN AND ALSO READ AND FROM JOHN BERENTHAL HIMSELF SHIA DID NOT SHOWER OR BATHE FOR MONTHS TO BE IN CHARACTER FOR THIS ROLE!!😮😮! SO I WOULD IMAGINE THAT YOU ARE CORRECT IT'S QUITE A GENUINE LOOK!!

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Wow! 😮

@theveryworstluck1894 7 ай бұрын

I subscribed because she literally says everything I'm thinking

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Thank you so much 🙏 💓

@aranerem5569 7 ай бұрын

Hey Shree

@ShreeNation 7 ай бұрын

Hey there Aran!

@casketeir 7 ай бұрын

Freedom isn't free. 3/11 ACR

@MabelLasmarias 7 ай бұрын

Damn stop talking gurl

@royceratliff7220 6 ай бұрын

I could seriously listen to you all night ❤

@ShreeNation 6 ай бұрын

💖🙏

@-Griffin- 7 ай бұрын

A random german Soldier is not a Nazi* :)

@chriswerth918 7 ай бұрын

I'm very sorry to say the following, but this movie is one of the most overrated pieces of propaganda, in the history of bullshit. Don't get me wrong. It is very well made. And the attention to the details is great. But it is - nevertheless - not just half glory to America bs, but completely unrealistic on the other hand.

@tomhoffman4330 7 ай бұрын

"Well You're Sorry, and I'm Sorry."👎

@sike2399 28 күн бұрын

What an angsty teen statement.

@chriswerth918 28 күн бұрын

@sike2399 year right. I am an military officer, 43 y o a, who spent most of his life in active service and who go's a masters history, so... What do I know? Next!