Your videos always make My day!😊😊😊😊❤❤❤❤

Prince Phillip was not granted the title of Prince Consort, its actually not a title consort means spouse of a Monarch, l think for our King, it was about Camilla's acceptance as Queen our media and a lot of the public took our late Queen's statement literally and Michael Middleton's was born into a wealthy family, there are politicians and aristocrats in his background. Carol's paternal grandfather was a miner

Next do a video on current and future Queens and consorts of Asia

AI is garbage and steals from artists, why are you rpromoting it??

@@lsmith9249Yes you are right Under British common law, a wife always takes the rank, style and titular dignity of her husband as a courtesy-the feminine form of her husband’s title. That means any wife of a King is automatically the Queen. Among the first female sovereigns, the notion of jure uxoris was applied. Jure uxoris, Latin for “by right of his wife”, traditionally allowed a man to take on any titles, land and responsibilities that might be inherited by his wife, in the rare cases when this did happen. For example, through some complex and not undisputed arrangements, Anne Beauchamp inherited the Earldom of Warwick and its considerable estates in 1449 after the death of male-line heirs. If she remained unmarried, she would have had the capacity to own and control the property as if a man. However, as she was married to Richard Neville he became jure uxoris the next Earl of Warwick and the possessor of its estates. This was a standard (albeit horribly patriarchal) arrangement in which a husband assumed control of that which belonged to his wife, including any substantive title she may have possessed on her own. Elizabeth II and Prince Philip When Elizabeth married Philip he had ceased using his princely title as a Prince of Greece and Denmark. These were derived from his grandfather George I (King of the Hellenes, i.e., Greece) and his great-grandfather Christian IX (King of Denmark). Although it is often remarked that he had renounced these titles, there is no evidence of a renunciation given in Greece and effectively he had simply ceased using them. Philip did, however, receive titles and styles that gave him formal recognition in the realm in a form not enjoyed by Prince Albert. As a peer: George VI created him Duke of Edinburgh, Earl of Merioneth and Baron Greenwich with the style HRH, and Philip took his seat in the House of Lords in July 1948. [2] But not as a prince: Although George VI commanded Philip to be styled HRH, he was not made a Prince of the United Kingdom. This was a historical anomaly since no one had previously been styled HRH who was not a prince. It is even more curious for the fact that a 1948 royal proclamation of George VI refers to him as “HRH Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh”. And then, to complicate matters even further, a later note by George VI corrects an entry that refers to Prince Philip, indicating a deliberate withholding of the word Prince. [3] It is thus unclear if this was an oversight if the use of the word Prince was the mistake of a royal bureaucrat (because Philip was commonly referred to as Prince Philip under his original titles) or why the a lack of clarity. Later title of Prince: In 1954-55, the Queen began correspondence with various courtiers and her prime minister around giving Philip a special title as her consort. Ideas such as “Prince Consort”, “Prince of the Commonwealth”, “Prince Royal” or Prince of X” were toyed with. Prince Consort was disliked by everyone, [4] probably due to its strong historical association with Albert. Elizabeth was keen on Prince of the Commonwealth, given her very strong dedication to the Commonwealth and its member countries beyond the UK, but it was vetoed on the basis that several Commonwealth countries were likely to object, creating political difficulties. In the end, the Queen and the cabinet settled on “The Prince of the United Kingdom”.

Yes they look very happy. Daniel seems like a good person

Agree I think they are my favorite royals

yeah love our royal family

The picture of Crown Princess Victoria @9:24 in that dress makes her sophisticated.

I feel the same!

I feel the same way. It’s the raw historical information. I’m intelligent enough to learn through my own biases.

Why do you label yourselves anti-monarchist?

REAL😂

@@jshipp5469 I am British and if you look at the state of the UK currently you can see why I am Anti Monarchy.

Thank you so much!

@@LindsayHoliday Always

Next do a video on current and future Queens and consorts of Asia@@LindsayHoliday

@danielsantiagourtado3430 she needs to do more research, The Princess of Wales HAD miners on her maternal side, her maternal great grandfather was a miner, but Catherine's father was born into a wealthy family he has aristocrats, politicians and some joined the church his grandmother was born into an Aristocratic family

They were probably close enough to where they considered each other like blood siblings

Does it matter? She was devastated when she found out that he was killed!

Step brother can still be a brother. They're family.

Does it even matter smh

Yeah. Philip was a prince consort but never held the title officially like Albert did. Prince Henrik of Denmark (husband of Queen Margarete II) also held the title of Prince Consort but he complained about not being named King Consort instead. It'll be interesting to see what Prince Daniel will be titled in time

he could be "prince of Sweden" like Frederick of Hesse-Kassel was during the reign of his wife Ulrika Eleonora@@reyisawesome

Prince Phillip was _a_ prince consort, but _Prince Consort_ was not his title. A prince consort is the husband of a monarch who is not a monarch in his own right. His style and title was *His Royal Highness The Duke of Edinburgh* .

@@RaymondHng Actually his title/style was His Royal Highness The Prince Philip, The Duke of Edinburgh.

@@matthewmacpherson5071 Yes. From 1957 onwards, _His Royal Highness The Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh_

Oh no 😢 that's sad

Praying very hard and cross fingers for the Crown Princess.

yeah exactly. Only Prince Albert officially had that title in Britain

At least Catherine is not like the hoe we have on the thrown now

I think she was born “middle class” but by the time she was in college they were rich. Her parents had their own business. Those schools she went to are enough to distinguish her.

@@Angel-ts8rc it's not only about wealth. Some of her ancestors were related to nobility. Some members of her family knew some members of the royal family personally. It's her whole social environment that looks upper class to me. Contrast this with Letizia Ortiz or Daniel Westling. There is nothing comparable in their families.

Michael Francis Middleton was born in Leeds on 23 June 1949 into a wealthy family with connections to the landed gentry. Wikipedia

In the UK the Middleton’s are solidly middle class.

I was so confused by that :D

I find Karl and Zita's story really interesting and would like to see that too!

William + Catherine are also Prince/ss and Grand Steward/ess of Scotland.

"Experiencing youth" doesn't necessarily include hanging around with convicted fellons having babies with them. She probably cried because she knew she didn't make the best choices and was embarrassed by them. Therefore, as an adult, she has to hold herself accountable and be transparent about them. None of what she did was acceptable. She's changed now but when you make bad choices, you have to own up to them. That's life and adulthood.

@@areiaaphroditewell I was taking more about the act on a larger view of having her do that bc of the press attention though they had no problem benefiting from the exposure… a lot her life isn’t particularly shocking or terrible esp considering the frequency that Norwegians wait to marry until having children and the rate of children born “out of wedlock” and have step families. They also don’t judge her based on her previous partners as is so unfortunately common in other cultures. I didn’t say that youth and the very popular Scandinavian party culture frequently involved having partners who make choices on their own to do crime separate from you. Owing up to “bad decisions” and being held accountable usually doesn’t mean a press conference because you by chance met a prince. She partied and had one baby with someone who made their own life decisions to be a criminal. She wasn’t embarrassed about her child who she took good care of, sitting in front of press and cameras reading off a statement to try to get people to stop being rude to you is embarrassing- embarrassing doesn’t mean that one is ashamed or embarrassed of themselves. You can even get second hand embarrassment.

@Angel-ts8rc 1. True, you can't choose the choices your partner makes, but you can very much choose who you have a child with. She knew the past of her previous fiance and her child's father before they were engaged and had said child with that person, correct? Most smart people wouldn't even go on a 2nd date with someone like that. Let alone get engaged and have a kid with them. Again, stupid decision. 2. No one is saying she needs to regret her child or her child should be condemned for their father, BUT it just wasn't the best decision. Let's say she didn't get her life together (which doesn't include marrying a prince), married the drug fellon instead, and never went to uni. What kind of standard of life would she be giving to her child? A father/srep-father in and out of prison while trying to make ends meet on a waitress' salary? Some children come out of that life FAIRLY, okay, but that's a small number. 3. If she's a public figure, then yes, it would be OBVIOUS that a press conference would be the way to address the PUBLIC. People of a country who she'll be representing as their future Queen? I highly doubt she was "crying from secondhand embarrassment" because I highly doubt she's proud of the choices she made in her youth. She admitted that they were bad and she was going through a "phase." She's not a victim, being bullied by making public statements at a press conference for a matter that affects the PUBLIC of a whole country.

@@areiaaphrodite we’re making bullet points now?? In response to 1. I’m not gonna keep entertaining judgment of a woman’s previous partners esp when she was so young. 2. What do you mean “but”? There is no but, her child is here there are no regrets. She was a SINGLE mother. And had her family’s help. Do you think she lived in the slums or something? Why are you making up fake scenarios? She did work and get educated and took great care of her child. And yes she met a prince, whom she had mutual friends with…. Now what? 3. You completely misunderstood what I said about second hand embarrassment… do I need to explain it to you? I didn’t say she had secondhand embarrassment. I called the whole situation a cruel embarrassment- to me it’s that for the whole family to make the soon to be bride do that right before the big royal wedding. What I went on to say in my other comment is that if she was embarrassed that doesn’t mean she was actively “ashamed” or something, talking to a bunch of press flashing cameras in your face bc people ar harassing you to the point someone had to type up a statement for you and make you read it days before your wedding is a little awkward.

There are still some. In fact, Malaysia has 9 state monarchies, of which the rulers of each take turns on the federal throne

​@@andypham1636that's so interesting I want to learn more about them

countries have different cultural norms brits tend to have stiff up lip attitude meaning not showing your shaken up so it translates to serious and dutiful

@@Celestialyeontan that’s a generalization considering the growing unpopularity of the royal family and the mixed reception of multiple members in the uk. To chalk up critique of their often cold, unnatural, out of touch attitudes to “culture” is something. My English , Scottish and Irish friends are some of the warmest, most fun, down to earth people I know in life and this generalization continues to be debunked each and every time I visit England.

@@Angel-ts8rc actually the royal family has seen a growth in global popularity as more people are learning about their customs and family connections

@@Angel-ts8rc I'm not saying brits are emotionless but living in the UK there is a general attitude of keeping calm and carry on which is true

No crazier than the fact that the Kings of Emgland/Britain were at one time also Princes of Hanover in Germany - George I and George II undertook considerable travel to fulfil their obligations in both places.

just Britain. kingdom of England had ceased to be before the hanoverians came to rule @@lilymarinovic1644

I feel that if it followed the Jacobite succession, more likely there would have been different marriages and heirs?

@@Tasha9315 definitely because people who would’ve been minor consorts or monarchs would be making different marriages

@@Tasha9315 well yeh probably but shhhhhh

Ok and..

they were prolly close enough that she considered him to be her brother

The kings of France channel recently released a video on her

Long live the patriarchy, eh? LOL

There were some.

The first two husbands of Mary I of Scotland were styled kings consort. Isabella II of Spain’s husband was styled king consort

​@@andypham1636Phillip II of Spain was styled King Consort of England when he married Queen Mary I Tudor

@@lilymarinovic1644 no, he wasn’t. He was made King jure uxoris

They would still carry on the Bernadotte name cognatically

No we are not in 1600s anymore, she couldn't have chosen a better husband!

what does that have to do with the video

@@andypham1636 Because they talked about it or you didn’t hear it!

Her illnesses aren’t hereditary. Her children won’t inherit them from her

it wasn't really queen Victoria's fault though. Possibly a genetic mutation, as neither of her parents nor her half siblings had it

maybe this video was filmed before, then released.

They’re all defunct

@@andypham1636 no sir they r true n they lived just 100-200 years ago . In fact queen Victoria was saddened after receiving a letter from the maharajas those days on the death of queens fighting in the battle filed

@@nicksworld2233 what?

That’s why it’s queens and consorts. Some will be queens, while some won’t

Sophie will be the princess consort of Liechtenstein someday

@@andypham1636 well, all of these people will be consorts. I just thought that the title queens and consorts was rather confusing and I guess I got rather confused when I was looking at Sophie.

@@mrm7098 Some of the people mentioned in the video will be Queens Regnant like Queen Elizabeth II was and the others will be Queens Consort like Queen Camilla.

😂😂😂❤

Well well. Hanging out with drugg users opposed being around nazis, how is most saint like.

@@Wonkothenormal Prince Phillip was around Nazi’s didn’t hurt his chances

WTF excuse me?! Crown Princess Mette-Marit is a lovely person who was a vulnerable and came from a unstable home, and have worked all her life to become a better person, works hard in her job, and who does so much for others and for her people. She is genuine, warm and kind. Wallis Simpson was a condescending evil nazi with narcissistic traits who conspired with the nazi's during WWII for power and control, and who was mostly interested in a care free, wealthy lifestyle where she could exploit others as much as possible without any consideration of anyone else but her self.

I said the same thing 😂

Prince Harry is not a direct heir to the throne as he’s 5th in line to the throne. These video is about people who are the direct heirs to their respective thrones.

What about them?

Yeah right

How would you know this?

@literology1329 What a load of nonsense.

Lol won't happened she likes the power she has to much

Leichedtstein Royals but Sophie is also true Future Queen of 🇬🇧

She isn’t in line to the Head of the Bavarian royal family, but she is in like to the Jacobite succession

Alois is her husband, + he’s regent because Liechtenstein monarchs just make their heir regent because dying

Alois is the HEIR of Leichtenstein Princely House. He will be the future monarch. Sophie will be just CONSORT of Liechtenstein. However, by blood, she herself has claim to the Jacobite of the UK

A reprobate past and unsavory friends arent barriers to a royal match as long as you are remarkably beautiful and not an actual felon.

Your comment is crass

Yet u watched lol ur a clown 🤡