JRE #2117 w/Ray Kurzweil KZfaq: • Joe Rogan Experience #... JRE on Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4rOoJ6E...
Пікірлер: 2 200
@scottwitham42553 ай бұрын
Joe: Asks a question This guy: "Exponential growth"
@UnknownUser-fe5zu3 ай бұрын
😂
@mas-udal-hassan92773 ай бұрын
[The secular West’s double standards are glaringly evident from how they deal with “irrationality”. When this so-called irrationality is linked with religion it’s a problem. However, when it comes to things like “gender fluidity” it’s completely fine. Another example that can be mentioned is how the “clairvoyant” Edgar Cayce was extremely popular during the early 20th century. And it’s the same story when it comes to aliens. The secular West, unable to fight its innate tendency to believe in the ghayb, proposes the likely existence of a non-human species that could communicate with our world - the same way Muslims believe in the jinn Of course, all of this is done in the name of their own religion: science. They even have their own priests in the form of astrobiologists, etc. This belief of theirs is of the same nature as ours. Even if they try and add some pseudo-empiricist spice: there may be tangible elements pointing towards the existence of aliens. They fail to grasp how we, too, say there are “tangible elements” regarding the influences of the jinn within our world.]@@UnknownUser-fe5zu
@chriscollins45393 ай бұрын
I was thinking this through the entire clip lol
@caleb74753 ай бұрын
J:So Elon said you can't do that Guest: Well he's not taking into account exponential growth
@phoenixmodellingphotography3 ай бұрын
"Oh my! You're sooooo big for me Mr Kurzweil teehee!" Ray Kurzweil: *"Exponential growth"*
@Prometeu-3 ай бұрын
Jamie pulls that up faster than he hands over a piece of paper...
@xaviergough93593 ай бұрын
Oh he Googles real good, guys. Pathetic. Kurzweil is a polymath.
@marcusash73 ай бұрын
@@xaviergough9359It’s always an Xavier lmao. Jamie does his job well, allow him.
@dominiquedorsey41973 ай бұрын
hes trained well
@akhilsharma833 ай бұрын
Jamie is an AGI all this time we didn’t know.
@andrewferguson80323 ай бұрын
Someone please tell him about the Interweb
@richardbroadway71903 ай бұрын
My skepticism is rising exponentially
@benbochenek49553 ай бұрын
Hell yeah. This was painful but I didn’t want to miss it.
@GrumpDog3 ай бұрын
So you didn't understand the seriousness of the implications? And the proof that it's happening with AI right now?
@93_til3 ай бұрын
hahahahah 10000000%
@DSpartantv3 ай бұрын
Lmao...mine too
@GeoffBournes3 ай бұрын
Along with your fear.
@EricJacobusOfficial3 ай бұрын
Ray's kid: I don't want 65 hamburgers Ray: you're not thinking exponentially
@swphittman2152 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😊
@Imdirtyydan3 ай бұрын
What I gathered … It’s growing exponentially, it’s all growing exponentially, exponentially.
@phnix62423 ай бұрын
Until its not anymore……. We had people on who explained transistors cant fet much smaller becsuse we are in sub-cellular scale Some stuff is just a few atoms wide on COUs Theres a limit And we being totally solar powered in 10 years is total bullshit……
@CantTellYou3 ай бұрын
lol what I gathered: everything ever will happen within the next decade because Kurzweil needs to be here to say “told ya so”
@DantesHQ3 ай бұрын
I don't get why everyone is giving this guy a hard time. He is trying to drill expontentials into your head so you can start thinking in those terms, especially since everyone thinks AI is moving linearly. 5 years ago we had bare bones systems, but now we have models that exceed human performance in a lot of areas, do perfect image generation and even really good video gen with SORA. This progress will keep doubling and doubling until we are reach AGI which will be to improve itself and then this chapter of humanity closes.
@GrumpDog3 ай бұрын
@@DantesHQ Kinda sad how that is flying over so many peoples' heads here.. This guy predicted the progress we're seeing now, nearly 30 years ago, progress that demands major changes to how our world works, and yet most people here are still acting like the people in the movie Idiocracy..
@alexi1113 ай бұрын
🤣
@jeezumcrow10073 ай бұрын
I like how the futurist pulls out a printed out graph
@freddiecuffe46883 ай бұрын
Lmao I was thinking the same thing. Futurist didn’t even laminate the documents
@thanos8793 ай бұрын
Right lol. A primitive sheet of paper. You would expect a futurist to be on the cutting edge of technology.
@NETBotic3 ай бұрын
@@thanos879 Years ago I predicted that futurists would still use paper documents.
@inspectorcrud3 ай бұрын
Yeah, he should have projected it onto Joe's face with a laser or something
@SaltyEntropy3 ай бұрын
A futurist who writes books is pretty funny
@iovie3 ай бұрын
Ray Kurzweil and his books are pretty legendary. He was the person who popularized the concept of the singularity to the mass public with his chilling explicit descriptions of what future technological milestones would look like and when they would occur which he wrote as if they were facts. He then single handedly defended his predictions throughout his life against the entire world community of critics and pessimists coming from all areas of science and the media. He is still standing today.
@IAmTheRealBill3 ай бұрын
Ray liberally interprets obvious failures as successes. Anyone can throw out general claims and defend them, that isn't special. For example, he claimed in the '90s or early 2000s that by 2009 most kids would learn how to read from computers before going to school. He claimed that was an accurate prediction, despite it not even being in the same ballpark as true today. He claimed it was accurate based on a single paper that stated as much as 9% of kids entering kindergarten knew how to read. Note that: 1) 9% is not most 2) The paper did not say how they learned 3. There was no discussion on what trend may or may not exist Anyone claiming that was a successful prediction deserves truckloads of salt for other things they claim. When you dispense with his vague, obvious, or restated what someone else said or is doing "predictions" he has as abysmal of a record as any. And by obvious, I mean to experts. For example he "predicted" the fall of the USSR. However, that was a done deal for experts years before he said it - it was considered obvious and inevitable by the experts. Just because the common folk lacks the knowledge doesn't mean he is special for 'predicting' what the experts have already asserted is inevitable. Claiming in the 90s that computers will have cameras and replace the use of phones is another one. That was done on mainstream broadcast television in the 60s and predicted even back then. How about nanotech eliminating "most diseases" by the 2020s? So far not a single one has been. You're not going to exponentialize your way to that one in the next 5 years. I wouldn't call him a hack, though IMO "futurist" is largely a synonym for it. But he isn't actually good at objective, novel predictions on technology advancement, let alone social ones.
@TonyCecala3 ай бұрын
Truth. Taking his worldview will help you skate to where the puck will be. That he looks to be slowing down, or dresses funny, does not take away from his core insight that expands Moore’s Law backwards in time to an age before computers.
@jsfnnyc25 күн бұрын
And then people worked to bring about his predictions. Funny how it works that way.
@yingle60273 ай бұрын
Bruh I haven't even reached human level intelligence yet. 2029 a laptop is smarter than me. 😭
@Michael-hb3ip3 ай бұрын
If your say "bruh" your opinion at that point DOESN'T MATTER LOL
@clrs65763 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@talkdatalk10023 ай бұрын
the laptop is far smarter than you now as well as ur phone
@RaiBread.2 ай бұрын
No lol... @@talkdatalk1002
@marcusrosales33442 ай бұрын
@talkdatalk1002 Your response is based off the same phenomenon when a cat attacks itself in the mirror. The cat thinks the reflection is real, but it just mirrors what the cat does. This is CURRENT AI! It is a reflection of us, very little real understanding. A laptop itself isn't "smart" btw...
@Redbird15043 ай бұрын
"I wasn't aware" - Joe Rogan calling bullshit
@ollybreh953 ай бұрын
You think Rogan has the ability to call bullshit on Ray Kurzweil? You obviously don’t know who Ray is…
@4thorder3 ай бұрын
@@ollybreh95 Agreed. I watched the whole interview and half the interview was useless. Don't get me wrong, I like Joe, but he didn't interview him, he spoke at him. Ray has a high level of accuracy in his predictions and is very intelligent person.
@RichOffKs3 ай бұрын
“All renewable in 10 years? 🤔🤔🤔”
@aztekwarrior233 ай бұрын
You have more faith In a comedian?! 😂.. As Joe says to all his followers
@benkrauz7253 ай бұрын
@@ollybreh95yeah he's the dumbest genius I've ever seen
@jopo79963 ай бұрын
I think Joe is finding this hard to follow, because all he's thinking about is how sweet those suspenders would be with his little rascals hat.
@kotycassidy69553 ай бұрын
That made me laugh thanks😂
@UnknownUser-fe5zu3 ай бұрын
Facts
@AndrewV10233 ай бұрын
Almost spit my coffe out 😂
@davidbelen71993 ай бұрын
Remember when Bill called his kangol hat a lil rascal hat. He's never worn it after that ...😂
@zillionfurball14513 ай бұрын
@@davidbelen7199I was about to say the same thing 😂
@durandondemand3 ай бұрын
Basic gist: It's growing exponentially. But are you? I'm still hopeful for those who are urgent in all things to maximize their potential, exponentially!
@derekstaroba2 ай бұрын
Ill remind you this is the same guy who said he hates humans and hopes robots reign Supreme. Cant blame him tbh
@Antwhitehead3 ай бұрын
Joe: Can we pull it up online? Futurist: What’s online?
@IAmTheRealBill3 ай бұрын
Even funnier: he "predicted" in the 90s that by 2009 digital documents will have fully replaced paper documents. He considers that prediction a success, despite still using paper documents in 2023/2024.
@Antwhitehead3 ай бұрын
That's hilarious@@IAmTheRealBill
@clintonleonard51872 ай бұрын
This futurist predicted the internet before "online" existed. Literally.
@Antwhitehead2 ай бұрын
@@clintonleonard5187 yet he looked at Joe like he has 3 heads when he asked him if they could pull up the information on the paper printout that he was handing across the table.
@welcometoreality4372 ай бұрын
@@Antwhitehead most likely because he was trying to advertise his book and posting information like that would undermine it.
@thanos8793 ай бұрын
I had to pause it at 8:00 and scroll to the comments to make sure everyone called bullsht after hearing that 😂
@dominick2533 ай бұрын
Same!!!
@user-cg7dg7uv8f3 ай бұрын
LOL Same here - At 8:09 I was like “I don’t know if I find this credible” and went to the comments. Glad to see most everyone else’s bullshit meters went off as well
@mrgobbleton3 ай бұрын
😂 literally just did this
@tertiusgous83483 ай бұрын
😂 8 minutes seems to be the bull shit handling standard
@brushstroke37333 ай бұрын
I went there as soon as he started talking about solar power around 6:00. Glad to see Joe's listeners are a lot smarter than this quack.
@Joey_Stringfellow3 ай бұрын
This was an exponential waste of time..
@chazmandingo53963 ай бұрын
You won't think that in 10 years
@alfredoj97913 ай бұрын
@@chazmandingo5396 the only thing that exponentially wasted here is your comment.
@matthewgrogg63753 ай бұрын
I can’t say for sure but I believe this was sarcasm, I’ll give it 10 years to be certain though
@jamesallenyz4313 ай бұрын
Best comment here. Dude was so full of himself
@CantTellYou3 ай бұрын
Disagree. We get to watch Rogan lose faith in his former hero, in real time!
@selfawarepotassium3 ай бұрын
This dude couldn’t look any less like the image of a futurist I had in my head. He looks more like an accordion player.
@SandNebula2323 ай бұрын
I’m making exponential gains of brain damage the more I watch this
@glorfification3 ай бұрын
Once it has human level intelligence, it will just spend all its time on social media, trolling people and reading celebrity gossip.
@andrewferguson80323 ай бұрын
And playing video games
@jedi40492 ай бұрын
simulates itself on drugs and alcohol
@clintonleonard51872 ай бұрын
Human level intelligence - not exactly the same as being human. A computer wouldn't waste time trying to release dopamine. It doesn't produce dopamine.
@AohhmadoneАй бұрын
@jedi4049 And if humans want it dead we can just spill water on it. Tzz tzzssss😂😂😂
@lawrencelawsen682429 күн бұрын
Also coming up with daydreams that have no relevance whatsoever
@MathGPT3 ай бұрын
I love that he brought a printed graph. Old school!
@user-ty9ho4ct4k3 ай бұрын
Old-school futurist
@richardbroad28483 ай бұрын
Bless him!
@awfulpwn3 ай бұрын
A lot of you guys don't know how important Ray Kurzweil is and it shows.
@brushstroke37333 ай бұрын
Important how? To whom?
@zrblank3 ай бұрын
Rogan has a lot of ignorant followers and it shows, you can see the contrast over on fridmans interview
@RaggedAdam3 ай бұрын
I've seen transcendent man. The guy is a bit of a lunatic.
@zsombornagy39353 ай бұрын
@@brushstroke3733He's important to Larry Page... and Neil DeGrasse Tyson, need anymore?
@brushstroke37333 ай бұрын
@@zsombornagy3935 NDT is a windbag, so that just undermines RK reputation even further. Larry Page likes RK - well whooptie doo.
@KennyVert3 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for uploading these digestible clips.
@jeremy4543 ай бұрын
He has the same problem AI has with not being able to say I don’t know
@honkytonkinson97873 ай бұрын
It’s like the cat in the box, until he knows he simultaneously knows and doesn’t know so exponential growth!
@hamzahhassan98613 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@No_Limits_4112 ай бұрын
Cos it will be exponential...
@Jake-Day3 ай бұрын
Remind me in ten years KZfaq.
@JarrodDSchneider3 ай бұрын
In ten years time KZfaq’s reminders will have grown exponentially, meaning you won’t be able to find the recommendation for this video because there will be too many to sort through.
@KeCasgrimola3 ай бұрын
in ten years i’ll be exploring andromeda galaxy because agi in 5 years, asi in 6 years, and in 10 years we’ll have made 10 million years of technological progress @@JarrodDSchneider
@phoenixrising70473 ай бұрын
Come back to this video in 10 years. Won't be long. Will be interesting to reflect on this mans position on things.
@MacDaddyC7Z063 ай бұрын
Reminding you about it at 18 hrs.
@boiboiboi14193 ай бұрын
See u next year
@user-jr6rt6ex9e2 ай бұрын
hello everyone in 2029 i hope i’m doing great in life rn
@davekush31713 ай бұрын
I listened to the whole episode. The asymmetry between this man's understanding of tech vs his understanding of humanity is dangerously immense!
@davekush31713 ай бұрын
The perfect example of "we will invent it in somebody else will figure out how to handle it"
@Feedmezz3 ай бұрын
His predictions are partly based on the fact that he’s 77 years old so it needs to happen before he dies lol
@ocallesp3 ай бұрын
5 years from now.... that is not easy for someone that is sick or too old
@mas-udal-hassan92773 ай бұрын
@@ocallesp😅😅😅
@DioBrandoWRYYYYYY3 ай бұрын
Kurtzweil is actually a cook who believes that eventually everyone is going to live forever
@timothyvincent34363 ай бұрын
Or he figures he will be dead soon so why bother changing his mind now. F it. Kind of like Keynesian economics.
@rockerdude863 ай бұрын
@@ocallesp he's been saying this for 30 years
@Overloaded8773 ай бұрын
People who say AI will never replace humans are in the first stage of grief = *Denial*
@michaelkupfer37232 ай бұрын
The AI needs us more than we need it
@activision41702 ай бұрын
Depends what you mean by replace
@dwaynelattimore8193 ай бұрын
Man Kurzweil is getting old. Hope he lives to see the Singularity
@billj45253 ай бұрын
He plans on living forever. He just said it on Lex Fridmans podcast like a year ago. He thinks he will.
@clintonleonard51872 ай бұрын
He's been focused on living forever since the 90s. He eats a really strict diet and takes a regimine of supplements.
@DarthMohammedRules7 күн бұрын
For a guy in his late 70s, I'd say he's doing pretty well.
@nicolasbascunan40132 ай бұрын
This is the new Tower of Babel.
@1214gooner3 ай бұрын
Ray’s own computational power seems to be sputtering😂
@djadsbeats3 ай бұрын
Ray.I
@dadisonline3 ай бұрын
Exponentially
@joshuaedwards33223 ай бұрын
Sure seems that way, but he's smiling like the cat who ate the canary... He's been working with computer intelligence before most of us were allowed off the porch. Also, he knows 3.5 million sheeple are watching. "How do I give them enough to be terrified, but not so terrified that they actually get off the couch and do something about this grape-session they are about to receive"?
@CantTellYou3 ай бұрын
idk about that, he’s clearly a ventriloquist dummy
@andrecheers91693 ай бұрын
Facts
@samtesla22483 ай бұрын
Bearable at 1.3 speed.
@nobody-cl1xr3 ай бұрын
Fixed it
@microchrist61223 ай бұрын
He sounds so normal at that speed it seems like this is a slowed down joke haha
@EolosMusic3 ай бұрын
You’re the kind of person that needs a subway surfers video put on the side, bc of your short attention span 😂😂😂😂
@sonnylambert48933 ай бұрын
@@EolosMusicSomebody makes a observation that is obvious to the majority of us because the guest is speaking extremely slowly. And meandering also I might ad, as if he’s hoping what he saying will make logical senve as he goes along. So in his and your own ideological defence, I am assuming ! you decide to insult that comment or, And many others who are agreeing, by saying they have some sort of attention deficit. So just what “of person are you”!😂
@blinkers883 ай бұрын
@@sonnylambert4893what on earth are you rambling about
@benbochenek49553 ай бұрын
This was painful. I did make a calendar reminder for 01/012029 with a link to this video. I’m going to test my current scecptisim and BS meter
@DantesHQ3 ай бұрын
You wont have to wait for 2029, AGI will be here in 2-3 years.
let's just hope the internet still exists by then...........
@thestarseeker81963 ай бұрын
I get the interview is a little sleepy but do people here really not know who Kurzweil is?
@Good.Glacier3 ай бұрын
Exactly my friend! A bunch of idiot savant bashing a true gentle Genius, Ray easily is still in the top 20 minds on the Planet right now. How disrespectful Joe has become.e, Joe is straight up a Dunce, he thinks his talking points are intelligence....what a dink.......what this chat shows specifically is that America is in great trouble when the vast majority actually think Joe is more intelligent and on point than Kurzweil.....I mean did they forget about Ramona? Tons of companies usurped Ray's work over the years, he alone basically invented AI with that project alone.
@z1z2z3z3 ай бұрын
I read two of his books, dude is a self aggrandizing hack who moves the goalposts continually to make his predictions 'correct' and then has the gall to brag about it, an intellectual for nit-wits.
@lewisburton18523 ай бұрын
right! crazy. "he developed the Kurzweil Reading Machine-the first machine that could read printed and typed documents aloud." and that's just one thing.
@TornSoul0624733 ай бұрын
No. No, they don't.
@eliaskahila3 ай бұрын
Judging from this comment section, man, I think most have absolutely no idea who he is and how legendary of a career he has had.
@southoc13553 ай бұрын
Every answer “exponentially” 😂😂😂😂
@brenthekideire3 ай бұрын
I'm still waiting for the hoover boards from back to the future.
@andrewferguson80323 ай бұрын
Ray is still working on his flux capacitor made from kitchen parts
@epicswirl3 ай бұрын
Do you mean hover? Or like a Hoover vacuum you can ride?
@shaunbauer782 ай бұрын
Antigravity tech is still strictly area 51
@LowkeyFish3 ай бұрын
Ray Kurzweil is a legend. Most of you guys are the crazy ones...
@eliaskahila3 ай бұрын
Yes, he really has an incredible career and life-of-work and he has been spot on on predictions as well. He is old, and having a tired day here, but judging from the comments here I feel people have no idea who he is. If they knew who he is, the comments wouldnt be like this. Sorry for Ray!
@nychris22583 ай бұрын
Yes, unfortunately most of Joe Rogan's audience are m0r0ns... Kurzweil is getting up there in years. He was a lot sharper at explaining this stuff 10 or 20 years ago. He's been accurately predicting the growth of computing power for like 50 years now.
@rohithkoteval17853 ай бұрын
Yes
@billj45253 ай бұрын
Well yeah, 90% of the comments on any youtube page are full of stupidity.
@AbdullahMikalRodriguez2 ай бұрын
Ray is bat shit crazy. He wants to revive his dead father with AI. These futurists have some serious personal issues...
@SpeakerOfWords3 ай бұрын
I'm hallucinating, exponentially
@Monsux3 ай бұрын
What is freaky about AI intelligence… The exponential growth. Start may seem slow, but learning rate isn't linear. Look back one year, two years, three years… Now make predictions for next year or two. It's going to be a wild ride.
@ghost9-9ghost3 ай бұрын
Precisely....and anyone who has had a kid has observed this in humans....they sometimes take a LONG time for their first word...and then 2 months later they are talking... Same with reading...I have a cousin who was slow to read....was concerning...but then she reached a threshold and just suddenly was reading everything like an adult
@activision41702 ай бұрын
The learning rate is a constant mate. It is linear by definition. Dynamic learning rates aren't really mainstream yet. Or do you mean loss?
@1214gooner3 ай бұрын
“We don’t need nuclear, we have sun and wind and 10 years.” “I’m sorry sir, the only truth here is that you yourself have less than 10 years of life.” “No, I have another 100 years. It’s exponential growth.”
@andreavanda54023 ай бұрын
Yup, years ago he said this was a race of beating the AI clock before his own demise.
@inspectorcrud3 ай бұрын
He's actually slightly younger than Sly, hard to believe I know
@replynotificationsdisabled3 ай бұрын
everything is nuclear
@dertythegrower3 ай бұрын
@@replynotificationsdisabledNo... the one in Miami has been leaking.. my first video is in the closest public park lake to it.. i know more sorry, its not safe. Undeniable science.
@dertythegrower3 ай бұрын
Not safe.. the miami plant is leaking.. end of convo you lose.
@Ravum3 ай бұрын
The 2 important questions about AI that people never ask: 1. Will it appear on jre as a guest? 2. Will authorities find a dismembered body in its house afterwards?
@activision41702 ай бұрын
If an AI bought a house before us, I'd be pissed. Sell it to humans dammit.
@coastcity70293 ай бұрын
AI will be so smart in the next decade that people will begin worshipping one like a God
@kirkfabrin48393 ай бұрын
Yep.somepeople are already at that point now with their phone!
@billj45253 ай бұрын
In terms of usage yeah. The guy with the comment about the phone is right. Technically some people are already there with their phone.
@shanebplante2 ай бұрын
Ai will make us gods
@activision41702 ай бұрын
As a computer scientist, I would cringe so hard
@familyfulkerson32573 ай бұрын
Guys, I'm an old fart and therefore know this guys story. He is hands down the most famous futurist, and for being right.... Bill gates called him the best predicter of future tech he knew. I do not personally have an opinion about this current conversation. I also, can't tell if he is speaking broadly or not. Or if he is speaking functionally possible vs actually implemented. What I want to say is, his background is incredible. He invented some very impressive tech back in the day before becoming famous as a futurist. If you are into this kind of information, it is worth your time to do a deep dive on Ray Kurzweil. I will say, his age is showing and that is painful to see. I've been with tech every step of the way. These last couple yrs have been the most dramatic, and that makes sense in the context of exponential growth. Its the later steps that see the biggest jumps. I do not rule out what he is saying in terms of technically possible, but sadly, I do not see humans functionally implementing it that quickly.
@Good.Glacier3 ай бұрын
💯 this chat full of idiot Joe worshipers, Ray's mind still is in the top 20 of everyone on the Planet, he literally invented AI with "Ramona"
@collinbergkamp70773 ай бұрын
I hear you. This comment section is sad and says a lot about where Rogan's audience is these days... painfully dumb.
@andrewferguson80323 ай бұрын
Good analysis, but Ray has clearly lost touch with feasibility. Just his argument about the grid was so far off, it was exponential
@elijahspears57783 ай бұрын
Yep. One of the most prolific inventors ever. People don't really know who this dude is.
@z1z2z3z3 ай бұрын
I know Ray, read "the singularity is near" book like 15 years ago, almost 100% of his predictions fell flat on their face. Then he wrote another book about how right he was and just moved the goal posts for all his predictions. Bill Gates praised him? you mean the college drop-out who buys out governing bodies and then makes his money off forced medical treatments? cool story
@TheGodlikeParagon3 ай бұрын
99.7% over 35 years is not exponential growth, that's less than doubling.
@Selfsufficientme3 ай бұрын
It's ALWAYS 10 years away... abundant energy, cure for cancer, end of the world etc etc... 😀👍
@IAmTheRealBill3 ай бұрын
Even YS congressional budgeting is based ion "the next ten tears" and we can see how terrible that winds up.
@Jagar_Tharn3 ай бұрын
But it's 5 years away. You didn't even read the title of the video did you?
@G73Server3 ай бұрын
Yea those things actually helping people are kond skept under a rug, this shito tho? Uncontrollable, we are going to see it in the next (few) year(s)
@Jagar_Tharn3 ай бұрын
@@G73Server kond skept shito???
@gabes3dvideos3 ай бұрын
Total faith in scientism is exponentially embarrassing with age.
@Natsirt6663 ай бұрын
Scientism?? That's... not a thing my dude...
@zrblank3 ай бұрын
Tf is scientism lol
@IAmTheRealBill3 ай бұрын
@@zrblank something you could look up on the Internet. it is essentially a quasi-religious belief that science and the scientific method are the only way to render truth about reality. That said, the OP seems to be misunderstanding it.
@IAmTheRealBill3 ай бұрын
@@Natsirt666 yes it is, my dude. But it isn't what the OP seems to think it is.
@shiddy.3 ай бұрын
same as any ism
@R.Gresco3 ай бұрын
What a marvelous toupee
@Jay-4073 ай бұрын
Exponentially
@martinsatyen78333 ай бұрын
@@Jay-407Toupeexponentially
@victorr22453 ай бұрын
This exponential discussion was exponentially exponential.
@Michael_Jackson1873 ай бұрын
Scientist: we have no idea where consciousness comes from. Computer bros: yea bro it will be able to be self aware. Have you guys ever seen the graph where the line is forever about to touch the other line but never crosses or touches it? Thats us.
@atomtamadas3 ай бұрын
This guy is the Peter Zeihan of technology :D
@ghost9-9ghost3 ай бұрын
I think zeihans hair is natural tho...
@justinkassinger82383 ай бұрын
Peter is right on mostly everything. Just cuz your one of the people who buys into the "the dollar is dying, buy gold!" Scam. Don't be mad that your a sheep
@brushstroke37333 ай бұрын
😂😂
@jeltoninc.85423 ай бұрын
What are some things Peter has been wrong in? Genuinely interested as I have watched some of his vids but I’m not a fanboy or anything. I just like watching people hike and talk 🤣
@MrExtr12343 ай бұрын
Not even close😂 guy's an engineer/scientist, zeihan is just some smooth brain commentator
@jeffpost57093 ай бұрын
This dude sounds like he’s talkin out his ass
@nathanthegod7313 ай бұрын
Agreed
@ghost9-9ghost3 ай бұрын
I think his geomagnetic poles are in the middle of shifting...
@terenceflanagan12253 ай бұрын
He is
@TeresaBelcher02Ай бұрын
Great interview Thank you for having Ray Kurzweil on I have followed him for years, he is an extraordinary man.
@matthewmiller22063 ай бұрын
A futurist who brings paper charts to a podcast… checks out.
@IAmTheRealBill3 ай бұрын
who predicted that in 2009 we'd see the end of paper documents as they'd be replaced by digital documents. 😂
@sinnwalker23 күн бұрын
@@IAmTheRealBillhe also predicted in 90 that AI will beat the world chess player by 98, it happened in 97.. not all his predictions are correct, but most are. AGI hasn't happened yet, but he made the prediction of by 29 it will occur, decades ago and most literally thought he was insane. Now after years they all agree with his timeline.
@chaselepard3 ай бұрын
Duncan's dad seems nice
@alexrangel4903 ай бұрын
I think he really needs a nap. He was very flabbergasted on the "is this graph online" question. Lol
@dominick2533 ай бұрын
He looked like he wanted to say damn kids want everything to be online. I have this perfectly printed out piece of paper here. 😅😅😅
@ghost9-9ghost3 ай бұрын
@dominick253 when society collapses you will be begging this lunatic for a sketch pad and a pencil...haha
@Occult-Classist3 ай бұрын
@dominick253 i mean that kind of has been his point. Just because he acknowledges the advancement of tech, it doesn't mean he loves it or wants to constantly engage with it. Quite the opposite, really.
@robertd98503 ай бұрын
It's in the book.
@doobiescoobie3 ай бұрын
He was like, damn, who is going to buy my books if you kids want everything online.
@robertd98503 ай бұрын
Aptera is already developing a solar charging car. Solar panels on the roof, hood, dash, and back add up to 40 miles per day depending on where you live, time of year, weather, etc.
@nexgen17013 ай бұрын
Great questions Joe, A.I. Pushing Ideology is one of the scary ones.
@WillyJunior3 ай бұрын
If this dude doesn't drink coffee he needs to start
@ghost9-9ghost3 ай бұрын
He's old and he has spent the last 20 years sewing those suspenders....so hes not in the best shape...haha
@IAmTheRealBill3 ай бұрын
@@ghost9-9ghost worse, if he is still on it, he was on a "less than 10% dietary fat" diet he allegedly came up with. That is about a third of what the few scientific papers to address neuroprotective intake uses.
@ghost9-9ghost3 ай бұрын
@IAmTheRealBill I very much agree....low fat diets are a terrible idea....despite that both keto and carnivore diets are based on pseudo science and the lies of zealots, one of the few things they have as benefit are fat content.....and putting niche studies aside, fat is simply required....structurally and functionally .. for human biology Yeah it's sad...I don't know much about kurzweil....but.....whatever he may have been in the past is gone...
The efficiency of solar panels hits some pretty hard limits based on the materials used to make semiconductors.
@ryantogo83593 ай бұрын
Nope you're totally wrong. Because muh exponential growth
@TheNaturalust3 ай бұрын
@@ryantogo8359 As an electrical engineer who has worked in and done research in that field, I must say you are wrong. But it’s pretty deeply technical and outside the understanding of 95% of people. Efficiencies started at about 6% when I started in this field and we’ve come a long way however.
@activision41702 ай бұрын
@@TheNaturalust It's a joke because the guy in the podcast is just saying exponential growth
@user-sv4rp3yd4x3 ай бұрын
Joe wantes to call BULL SH#T but he's too nice
@kathleenp31353 ай бұрын
He’s so nice.
@geoalpha3 ай бұрын
He matches the energy of who he talks to, generally. Kurzweil is so soft spoken nowadays Joe just wants to get him talking at all.
@Gnaritas423 ай бұрын
Yup, he believes Elon over Ray, as he should. Ray is talking out of his ass right now.
@bhavjotsingh31903 ай бұрын
Like he knows shit about technology lmao
@1labrinth3 ай бұрын
When the technologist has paper documents be skeptical
@arsemyth89203 ай бұрын
What a surreal conversation
@Dark_Embracer5 күн бұрын
I've been following Ray Kurzweil for decades. Ray Kurzweil is a futurist so many of his future predictions have come to fruition. AI, AGI, ASI and Solar Powered Cars is nearly there.
@masonm6003 ай бұрын
I read his book "The Singularity Is Near" in 2004. He has stayed remarkably consistent in his big predictions. Which conveniently are still years out. But he doesn't always see the gap between "there is tech for this" and "there is demand for this." And yes, he applies exponential growth to everything, even places it doesn't apply. Case in point: he says life expectancy is on an exponential growth curve. And average can look like that if you squint, but *maximum* lifespan has remained consistently ~120.
@andrewferguson80323 ай бұрын
He is confirmation bias personified
@IAmTheRealBill3 ай бұрын
Indeed, he does *now* consistently say these things are "a decade' or "decades" out. Because despite what the comment section here believes, his actual accuracy is in the gutter.
@arryharry3 ай бұрын
Just in time for the predicted 2030 reset... 😅
@jeltoninc.85423 ай бұрын
You see it for what it is. Nothing is “by accident” or “random”.
@joespeigle12403 ай бұрын
This conversation reminds me of a slow motion version of the 7 Minute Abs scene from There's Something About Mary
@samdavis4563 ай бұрын
We need to create AI that has to sleep 8 hours a day to give us a chance 😅😴
@creativename61263 ай бұрын
Rays entire philosophy stems from a deep rooted fear of death. All of his estimations have always been for it to happen right before he reaches the life expectancy. The singularity has a major issue in that it does not account for diminishing returns, nor does it account for sentient AI just not willing to be enslaved.
@DantesHQ3 ай бұрын
If you read his book he answers all of that. Diminishing returns do not exist with technology because technology innovations compound between each other. We use old technology to build better technology and we then use better technology to build even more amazing things. This is what leads to exponential growth.
@yaboiflint59263 ай бұрын
@@DantesHQah yes the exponential growth, I forgot to take that into account
@zsombornagy39353 ай бұрын
@@DantesHQThats most people's problem in the comments, they don't read his book or anything about him, they go off this podcast appearance and make assumptions.
@lewisburton18523 ай бұрын
@@DantesHQ Diminishing returns exist accross the board even tech just manufacturing chips is a huge problem.
@BaphomentIsAwsome6663 ай бұрын
@@DantesHQThe plank length would like to talk to you
@ryansark17953 ай бұрын
New drinking game, every time he says" expidential growth"
@satorified16123 ай бұрын
I’d be puking my guts out…..
@alexanderson94423 ай бұрын
This guy talks like an AI trying to learn human but only studied the books 😂
@GovnaBuckingham3 ай бұрын
nerds
@Danny-qh4su3 ай бұрын
Yeah he's either lying or ignorant, and nuclear is the future. He's probably taking money from renewable companies or lobbies.
@Dollapfin3 ай бұрын
@@Danny-qh4subiggest issue with this is that the guy has no idea why he’s talking about nor what Joe is trying to ask him.
@boylerbg3 ай бұрын
Fuck me you are hilarious. Brilliant😅
@andrewferguson80323 ай бұрын
This guy is the Mike Baker of math
@ShadyNorris3 ай бұрын
It will happen in (insert random number) years. Trust me.
@TheBlackClockOfTime3 ай бұрын
Really listen to his point on LLMs regarding the timeline of progress. If you don't get it: listen to it as many times as it takes for you to get it. 9:40 (for about 30-60 sec from there before they go into hallucination).
@Atticus_Moore3 ай бұрын
Rebuilding the grid will be the most vital step
@MilGrip763 ай бұрын
Distributed power ftw
@LoadPuller3 ай бұрын
When was his last prediction correct?
@TomRopez3 ай бұрын
Apparently he has 88% success rate but I’ve not seen the predictions themselves. I just don’t trust his appearance 😂
@anu17763 ай бұрын
@@TomRopezlmfao he does look a bit off hahahaha
@dertythegrower3 ай бұрын
I have proven ones here.. he does not.
@tacitozetticci93083 ай бұрын
It's basically the same deal as Dr Ben Goertzel lol but yeah in the end they aren't nuts. (Ray is clearly getting old though, this clip sucks)
@IAmTheRealBill3 ай бұрын
@@TomRopez The 86% figure thrown around about him is one he came up with. But it includes obviously failed predictions as accurate. For example he claimed that by 2009 most kids (presuming in the western countries, or even just in America) would learn to read at home before school using computers. Clearly that didn't happen. But in his self-analysis of his "own" predictions he called it accurate because a single paper claimed that 9% of kids entering kindergarten knew how to read. Nothing in the paper attributed it to computers at home, and 9% is much closer to 0% than it is 51%. He basically makes vague assertions that experts in the field are already doing, then claims credit when something can remotely be interpreted as him predicting it. Another example he claims is that he predicted the fall of the USSR. but experts had done that years before.
@captainbumface35953 ай бұрын
Chating shit, AI still thinks the Vikings are black.
@michaeldeats3283 ай бұрын
Whose to say they weren’t black be more open minded
@_Scarlet13 ай бұрын
@@michaeldeats328history. History says that Vikings weren’t black
@Pir-o3 ай бұрын
That's the stupidity of people who put restrictions on it, not stupidity of the AI itself.
@michaeldeats3283 ай бұрын
@@_Scarlet1 yea but they also said Jesus was white your claims are sus your stance feeble and your beliefs flawed, go to the yard with the other specials and play nice
@GovnaBuckingham3 ай бұрын
woosh@@_Scarlet1
@JesusChristBlesses3 ай бұрын
“Uhm, exponential, uhm, exponentially, uhhhhhhhhhmmmmm…”*powers down AI self*
@brittanym16263 ай бұрын
He’s not actually answering Joe Rogan’s questions. He’s just repeating himself over and over again in “10 years.”
@dilldowschwagginz26742 ай бұрын
He's a typical self absorbed lib from academia. They're ALL like that
@BOZ_113 ай бұрын
he's conflating the growth in computational power with "AI" (chatbot) programs. LLM's will plateau and we'll need a paradigm shift to make big strides; it is not linear, it's stop-go for "AI"
@theredknight93143 ай бұрын
No
@GovnaBuckingham3 ай бұрын
cars are literally driving themselves cuh
@thechatgpttutor3 ай бұрын
might be the case, but LLMs can be made better, faster etc all those nice things before we need something 'new'
@DantesHQ3 ай бұрын
Nope you are just straight up wrong. As we scale deep learning more and more emergent properties seem to emerge out of the systems. Claude 3 for example just passed the needle in the haystack and display high levels of situational awareness. This all happened because we optimized and scaled. There could be a few things that we are missing, but so far it seems like we wont be needing those things.
@activision41702 ай бұрын
@@DantesHQ No, they do plateau. You're talking about the training data / model which isn't really what they're talking about. Think about the the number of layers in a network. For example, Resnet-50 vs Resnet-101 vs ResNet-152. The improvement among adding the layers is not exponential to the number of extra layers, and it will plateau eventually (i.e., error % is typically not much different from Resnet-101 vs Resnet-152 compared to the difference between Resent-50 and Resent-101 which is larger). Computational power helps a lot, but that's not all it is. They need to design better architectures.
@seanthompson61593 ай бұрын
What the hell is a futurist?
@taylemgames26523 ай бұрын
Someone who uses intelligent speculation to predict the future.
@melloone6113 ай бұрын
You need AI to answer that question lol ask Siri
@freddiecuffe46883 ай бұрын
@@melloone611lmao perfect answer
@TJL69693 ай бұрын
Another variation of a Globalist Elite billionaire freak
@Pir-o3 ай бұрын
Someone who really likes the word "Exponentially"
@httr943 ай бұрын
How can you not take this man seriously? Just look at the wig and the suspenders. He's a serious person. My respect for him grew exponentially while watching this.
@LK-ui9rx3 ай бұрын
"100% Renewable energy in 10 years" That's not even possible theoretically
@jwm27623 ай бұрын
lol you're not accounting for the exponential growth though
@KernalPanics3 ай бұрын
Ya not gonna happen.
@KernalPanics3 ай бұрын
And the use of energy is going up a lot year by year now due to crypto mining and A.I. training as the training of them uses a lot of energy and is only going up.
@andreavanda54023 ай бұрын
Until the grid collapses! Nikola Tesla he's NOT!
@gypsyemperor75353 ай бұрын
@@andreavanda5402 Nikola Tesla was a mad man who died in poverty, most of his ideas were pure insanity
@GrumpDog3 ай бұрын
Do people not realize how serious this is? This should be the CENTRAL election issue! How workers are going to survive as AI takes most jobs businesses were once willing to pay humans for, needs to be prepared for ASAP! Our labor based economy will not continue to work! The average worker should not starve, just because AI will soon do most work.
@MichaelErnest6663 ай бұрын
UBI
@terenceflanagan12253 ай бұрын
🤣. You're very presumptive that anytimg will be resembling order in 2 years
@IAmTheRealBill3 ай бұрын
Nice parody.
@Jagar_Tharn3 ай бұрын
@@IAmTheRealBill Ignorance is bliss.
@activision41702 ай бұрын
Labor based economy is failing without AI.
@static1dragon3 ай бұрын
We still do not have light processing at the level we need for true AI. Not just novel machine learning tasks we call AI. Processing still needs to be much better. 2029 is still too early for that. I would be surprised if true light processing was halfway there by 2029.
@TheBlueB0mber3 ай бұрын
Expectation: AI gets smarter Reality: Human gets *dumber*
@user-sf3dw2sm3bАй бұрын
Some humans will merge with AI. They are already being raised by parents with a secret. The secret is some children have been genetically enhanced. They have been doing it for years.
@mikenapier35982 ай бұрын
I was waiting for that guy to pull out an overhead projector....
@MG777403 ай бұрын
I was worried that it was just geometric grow but so glad that it’s exponential.
@RustOnWindows3 ай бұрын
To truly become human it has to be wrong and fail at times. Have to be able to purposefully oppose things to create awkward situations
@freddiecuffe46883 ай бұрын
True statement
@ryantogo83593 ай бұрын
Literally no one said anything about becoming human, Merlin
@kakamarioluigi3 ай бұрын
We need to change the name to SI simulated intelligence, lets not be too hasty to put this stuff on a pedestal.
@IAmTheRealBill3 ай бұрын
Or just use language model.
@activision41702 ай бұрын
@@IAmTheRealBill Can't be language model because not all models are language-based (e.g., CNN).
@activision41702 ай бұрын
How about: Curve optimization Why even say intelligence? That's where people go wrong.
@talopi3 ай бұрын
"The power output of the sun is growing exponentially", I couldn't take this guy seriously after I heard that line
@bkb04g3 ай бұрын
Solar panels have an upper bound for effeciency at around 45%, but thats not a bottleneck, you can simply produce panels. They have increased dramatically from what existed in the 90's however.
@conr21413 ай бұрын
He's right.. most AI experts have been readjusting their estimates of AGI to ever-earlier dates over the decades. Kurzweil has stuck to 2029 all this time. He's also gotten 80+ % of hist past predictions right.
@FailBucketFilms3 ай бұрын
Please provide his predictions (successful or otherwise)
@IAmTheRealBill3 ай бұрын
@@FailBucketFilms he won't. You see that 86% is Ray's own assessment, which includes obvious failures such as "most children will learn to read via computer before school by 2009" - which clearly is a strike out. He largely makes general assertions that are not novel, vague, and usually obvious to the experts. For example he claimed in the 90s that computers would eventually replace phones for communication - something that was predicted in the 60s. Ray basically follows the school of thought that says "make a shit-ton of predictions, people will forget the failures and marvel at the few successes" - which this comment section is demonstrating to be true.
@activision41702 ай бұрын
Name one AI expert that has actually contributed to the field that gave an AGI estimate you are referring to. Also, he can't be right even if he is right; he doesn't have enough understanding of the field to make reasonable claims. As shown in the interview.
@winstonsol87133 ай бұрын
In 2027 he’ll adjust this to 2035. And so on. In 1990 everyone thought we’d be on Mars and have flying cars before 2020.
@Maniacsface3 ай бұрын
Only movie buffs thought that.
@willyword34133 ай бұрын
Not that tho it’s like Moore’s law it will prob be a bit sooner
@EolosMusic3 ай бұрын
Actually he has said 2029 since like 50 years ago so you’re wrong lol
@EolosMusic3 ай бұрын
@@willyword3413 These plebs don’t know what’s coming 😅
@masonm6003 ай бұрын
He's had the same date since at least 2003. Singularity 2045! But ya he just waves away the idea we could plateau any time soon.
@erinfreize47173 ай бұрын
The slope of the line is decreasing these last thirty years, but the scale of the y axis is exponential.
@ModerateObserver2 ай бұрын
Kurzweil's whole schtick is unjustified long-term extrapolation of exponential curves. Turn his exponentials into (more realistic) s-curves and the end scenario looks a lot different. We could well find that out soon when solar plateaus, when GPT 5 proves an incremental advance.
@FractalPrism.Ай бұрын
there is no s-curve, no 'schtick'. no matter the window of time viewed, technology advancement has always been exponential disliking how this is constantly proven correct does not make it less so
@txterbug3 ай бұрын
2029 kind of an odd exact number
@mrbentiify3 ай бұрын
Joe: So what's the solution then to all the world's problems? Ray: Exponential growth
@rb80493 ай бұрын
My car charges fully with the excess solar energy I don’t use for my house. And my solar system is small. The technology is a lot better than people realize.
@omememe3 ай бұрын
absolutely agree that with the advent of A.I., quantum computing and the rest of technology we might have all of these options available, but weather they will be implemented is entirely different question to answer.
@Iamrightyouarewrong3 ай бұрын
Well he's wrong.
@angryoperatorakacrazybob89983 ай бұрын
Ya I agree. .I think..lol
@breadgarlichouse22653 ай бұрын
why is he wrong? How do you know that you are not wrong?
@nonnobis22323 ай бұрын
In my expert opinion I concur!
@rockerdude863 ай бұрын
Sounds like you have not been keeping up
@_hootjohnson3 ай бұрын
Maybe he means AI is getting dumber every year. If that’s the case, he would be right.
@alienatedbeing75133 ай бұрын
What this guy doesn’t realise is that there’s a limit to this tech, and the closer you get to the limit the slower the advancement is. His lack of understanding in solar panels shows this