deja vu

Daniel Vilar da Costa They changed something

It WAS the same cat. Guess who really runs the matrix? You (& Douglas) thought the pandimensional hyperintelligent mice commissioned the world, but they just tagged along to sneak in their own program. The actual masters of the Great Dream are their predators that they can't quite escape.

We had to save component space for what we can, next version will have more $1 coins to make things easier in another aspect, but ales work how they work, players will just need to be mindful about it

Here's an idea.. if you don't like watching Game the Game, then.. oh, I don't know.. don't watching it, maybe?

@@BrknSoul But I'd like to. Everyone who watches CR regularly gets G&S content in their feed, even without being subscribed. Their videos are full of pleasing nerdy stuff but, once inside, I don't feel like staying for long. Too mild for my geek taste.

as in critical role will be its own thing? or they quit doing it?

@@choiceofmusicROCK Own thing on it's own Twitch and KZfaq channels, they have their own separate studio already

Yeah it does look like Critical Role are setting themselves up as an independent channel once their contract runs out. The channel is already producing additional content like Between the Sheets and All work, no play. They already make enough through Patreon and Twitch donations that they basically don't need Geek and Sundry anymore. I have noticed that G&S have been trying other shows in a similar format to Critical Role for some time now. They tried with the campaign Will Wheaton set up which was very highly produced but had quickly dwindling viewer counts after the first episode. They do their Star Trek focused one which doesn't get quite as many views as CR. Lets be honest, Game the Game, which started out as a twitch exclusive show where the host would interact with chat (and thus would have a chance at having any little incidents of rules breaking corrected on the spot) basically got groomed as the tabletop replacement instead, removing its main draw which was chat interaction. The problem is, Becca, as nice as she is, just doesn't seem as personable as Will and the whole thing has this semi-awkward atmosphere because of that instead of the casual one Will provided. It just feels like a slightly worse version of Tabletop now, which is basically what it is.

@@luketfer >They do their Star Trek focused one which doesn't get quite as many views as CR. It gets a tiny fraction of the views lmao, like not even 10k compared to CR which is hundreds of thousands (and millions on the early episodes0

Becca plays to WIN, wil tryed to win but had more fun just playing abbysmal roll or not, if she stopped trying to crush everyone into the ground would love it, Becca is like a finall Boss while Wil was like a Mini-Boss

Yesss

This is better than Tabletop. It doesn't have "seasons" with long waits in between, it shows the FULL game, they seem to make less mistakes and Becca is more entertaining than Wil.

@@MicBain I think the video editing, interview in between, explaining rules, and sound is way better in Tabletop. I agree Becca is more entertaining though. Maybe put Becca as host in Tabletop :) Also they didn't correct Becca's mistake. :(

@@MicBain Becca being "hot"doesn't make it better, she definetelly isn't more entertaining than Will, Tabketop for the win, anyone sharing your opinion shouldn't have a right to vote!

@@nothingyet120 I didn't mention her being hot, that was you that said that 😂

I absolutely don't care for it

I imagine Geek and Sundry is well aware that people preferred Tabletop *but* Wil Wheaton's been distancing himself from Geek and Sundry since it got bought out by Legendary Entertainment (Project Alpha) and it looks like he isn't coming back.

Yes and no. This existed before G&S was bought out, but Wil walked when Project Alpha happened, and (I think) they're trying to promote this as Tabletop's replacement.

no, it existed before tabletop.

I mean... it's OK. The production values are good and the games chosen are typically pretty great. The players don't seem overly charismatic though like Tabletop. I think the host does a decent job but it just feels awkward in a way Tabletop very rarely was. I'm still happy that there's something Tabletop adjacent though.

Trying to win will get people kicked from your games, lol. Being strategic and cut throat are very different.

@@xragg yeah I think the OP doesn't actually know what cheating is or they're just a hater

@@blackvial I have watched enough of her hosting to see her cheat. You could tell by the look on her face and she even questioned if Bee Sting is 1 word. Come on she knew it was 2 words. Her guests were just polite. And there is a difference between trying to win and playing cut throat. And if you 2 can't tell the difference in that then you're exactly the type of people we wouldn't have in our group. I'm not hating on people who want to win. I'm hating on her because on multiple games I have caught her cheating. And only recently has she started to allow her guests a chance to play the game before she taped it. And I even seen her run that fact in. I don't like her, preferred the way Will hosted. Hell I even prefer the guy who hosted the Axis and Allies Zombie game.

Roy Glover I agree, it is so annoying watching her cheat! As the host she is supposed to know the rules and should at least reference check when unsure. Yet somehow she seems to be the one who makes the most (and most advantageous) “mistakes”. Either she is cheating or she is super careless, which both are bad qualities in a host.