No video

How CPUs and Processors are Made for Smartphones, Laptops, and Desktops

  Рет қаралды 168,869

Gary Explains

Gary Explains

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 331
@bertnijhof5413
@bertnijhof5413 3 жыл бұрын
It brings back some almost forgotten memories. Around 1991 I worked for 6 years in the Waferfab Automation Department of Philips Semi Conductors Industry in Nijmegen, now Nexperia-ITEC. In that time we had a lot of contacts with the Philips Research Lab and AMSL a former part of Philips both in Eindhoven. A colleague went for 1 year to TMSC Taiwan. I lived in interesting times!
@springrollwang4441
@springrollwang4441 2 жыл бұрын
Now we have super computer in our pockets, and people still complain about it's not fast enough.
@arashsamadi7795
@arashsamadi7795 3 жыл бұрын
Gary is the best at explaining complicated stuff in an understandable way!
@1MarkKeller
@1MarkKeller 3 жыл бұрын
The Professor professes very well!
@franconianbike
@franconianbike 2 жыл бұрын
But he should have explained the MOSFET instead of a PNP or NPN transistor, 'cos it's commonly used in CPUs
@dejangavrilov6459
@dejangavrilov6459 2 жыл бұрын
@@1MarkKeller 6
@1MarkKeller
@1MarkKeller 2 жыл бұрын
@@dejangavrilov6459 Classmate!
@aimanrahman5768
@aimanrahman5768 3 жыл бұрын
Man no other KZfaqr can cover the topics you do truly an unique chanel
@1MarkKeller
@1MarkKeller 3 жыл бұрын
The Professor is a proficient professer!
@JayHere
@JayHere 3 жыл бұрын
Dr. Ian Cutress from Tech Tech Potato has a similar channel. There are people who can cover this subject but arent as big so you're not aware of them.
@aimanrahman5768
@aimanrahman5768 3 жыл бұрын
@@JayHere I follow him bro de doesn't do animation though
@n0nenone
@n0nenone 3 жыл бұрын
My main question here being - Even if you can control semiconductor like if it can conduct or not [9:40], it's done when current is passed through it or not. But a conductor by definition is something which conducts WHEN current is passed through it.. so isn't semiconductor just a conductor at all times except when it's not doing anything in which case, it shouldn't even matter if it's conductor or not
@LittleRadicalThinker
@LittleRadicalThinker 2 жыл бұрын
Gary explained everything tech....
@aveekbh
@aveekbh 3 жыл бұрын
19:13 Semiconductor chips are one of the most precisely engineered things we see in daily life. Imagine how well-engineered and precise the machines that make the chips need to be.
@middleclasspoor
@middleclasspoor 3 жыл бұрын
I had no idea of the complexities involved in the manufacture of a cpu. It certainly makes you realize the things we take for granted! An amazing video! Thank you Gary!
@aadeel564
@aadeel564 3 жыл бұрын
Sir, great for explaining this complicated process in a relatively simple manners.
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@moldytexas
@moldytexas 3 жыл бұрын
This was necessary🙌🏻
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
I am glad it was helpful.
@peppigue
@peppigue 3 жыл бұрын
The world is a complicated place. Apple and Samsung are obviously competitors, so I was blown away when I learned that Samsung made the screen for the iPhone X. As we have learned in the last year, global supply chains are highly integrated and optimized for regular flow, meaning any disturbances propagate all over.
@nikitastritsaris
@nikitastritsaris 2 жыл бұрын
Very, very interesting informations and explanations. I really din't know the difference of numbers of transistors in a lithography type, amongst the manufacturing companies. I thought it was a standard thing! Thanks for all the efford and research!
@EnVideoZone
@EnVideoZone 3 жыл бұрын
Gary, You explained!
3 жыл бұрын
A great video Gary - Excellent summary about making modern CPUs - very compact but never the less extremely extensive content. I was kind of shocked that all big CPU manufactures TSMC, Samsung and even Intel are dependent on just one company worldwide that is able to produce these extreme ultra violet lithography machines. It's the ASML Holding (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASML_Holding) in the Netherlands NOT Denmark. In other words, the hole 'silicon' world depends on just one single point of failure. This is quite scary to me.
@sleepytime677
@sleepytime677 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for making these videos. I find the whole idea of mobile phones and laptops so fascinating due to how much they’re able to do, but I’ve never understood how they were able to work. With Apple releasing the M1 chip I’ve become more interested in learning about it and your videos are really good at explaining the basics. I still find myself getting a bit lost with some of the more technical terms but I usually look them up if I’m not feeling too lazy haha.
@PlanetCypher_
@PlanetCypher_ 3 жыл бұрын
Ultra UV lithography, wow what a machine, would like to see @MikesElectricStuff do a tear down 😄👍
@aveekbh
@aveekbh 3 жыл бұрын
Well, it will be quite a while before one shows up on eBay. A large number of the billions of chips that are made are on the mature (older) process nodes. These machines are always in high demand.
@gordonlawrence1448
@gordonlawrence1448 3 жыл бұрын
Nope we were way past UV lithography a decade ago. 10nm is the wavelength for near X-rays and we have chips these days in the lab working at 2nm.
@1MarkKeller
@1MarkKeller 3 жыл бұрын
*GARY!!!* Good afternoon Professor! Good afternoon fellow classmates!
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
MARK!!!
@davidmurphy563
@davidmurphy563 3 жыл бұрын
I do enjoy this channel, you're very good at covering these topics. You have a tendency to rudely and aggressively jump down your subscribers' throats the moment they show any misunderstanding or misconception of the highly complex topics being discussed but your screen persona is polite at least and you do know your stuff.
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
How dare you... I'll show you... LOL, only kidding 😂😜 If I analyze myself, which I know can be hard, I don't have a problem with people misunderstanding things. I wouldn't make these videos, if I did. I struggle with people who make it personal, and start calling me names or make personal remarks about me. Also with people who have a little bit of knowledge and think they know everything. When I then ask them to prove or explain or expound they tend to get belligerent. There seems to be universal imbalance with KZfaq. It seems the rule is that viewers can write whatever they want and the video creator must just accept it, but if the creator replies then some how I am being rude. I don't think I am just rude for the sake of it, well I hope I am not, I think, as I said, there is an imbalance in attitude. No one ever said, go read the comments section on KZfaq it is so nice there.
@davidmurphy563
@davidmurphy563 3 жыл бұрын
@@GaryExplains Right, that's it, I demand satisfaction! Pistols at dawn! Jokes aside, people who are trolling / just rude / arrogant in general deserve a bit of a dressing down and you've got every right to. That's not what I was referring to. I was referring to people who simply get something wrong, haven't understood and maybe ask a bit of a dumb question - but do it politely. I mean, I've yet to see a case where they were right and you weren't but jumping down their throat and saying words to the effect of "did you watch the video or not?!" Well, clearly they did and just didn't understand it... If you're discussing highly technical details about chipsets or whatever, it might seem obvious to you and me, but some lay people might struggle / misunderstand and ask a dumb question or say something that's plainly wrong. That sort of person isn't a troll, they haven't been rude or claimed to be an expert (yet, at least) it's an opportunity for them to learn. Jumping down the throat of someone like that because they made a mistake is a bit unedifying. That's a reservation I have but, on balance, I very much like the channel and appreciate what you do.
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
Hmmm. I understand what you are saying, but politely I disagree. Many times when I ask people if they watched the video, I would say 8/10, if the person replies they admit that they didn't and they were just commenting based on the title or the first couple of minutes. I don't recall any situations where I have replied unkindly to a genuine question from someone who actually watched the video but didn't get something. In my defense I remember lots of people who thanked me for interacting and helping them clear up any doubts or misunderstandings. Maybe you could point me to some examples, worse case it will help me to see the error of my ways.
@davidmurphy563
@davidmurphy563 3 жыл бұрын
@@GaryExplains Oh goodness Gary, I'll not going to go through comments looking for unpleasant exchanges. I appreciate you taking my comments on board and responding to me. That aside, this channel is an absolute credit to you. Your enthusiasm and expertise are simply brilliant and wish you every success.
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
Indeed there are lots of comments, that is also one reason why some of my replies can seem terse at times, as I am literally reading thousands of comments. But here is any example of someone who liked my replies: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fM9gdK6j1di7qJs.html&lc=UgwDNYfAQJnW3jJvKuh4AaABAg
@l2etranger
@l2etranger 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Gary, that’s beyond academic grade education. Your way of articulating the info for your topics could land to a degree. I don’t know how up to date Intel’s finfet is, but a comparison to their processes with the ASML machine would be awesome to learn.
@roadrage9191
@roadrage9191 2 жыл бұрын
FinFet has been the standard for all chips, however to make chips smaller this will need to be replaced with GAA = Gate All around. This however has more to do with chip design, not so much with the ASML machine.
@muhamadshaufik2127
@muhamadshaufik2127 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you prof, it reminds me of my year in universities!!
@robertclarkguitar
@robertclarkguitar 3 жыл бұрын
Photonic Chip looks to be a thriller in the making.
@robertprice73
@robertprice73 2 жыл бұрын
I know there wasn't time to go into much detail about transistors, but in 9:08 the symbol on the left is for a bipolar junction transistor (BJT), while the illustration on the right is of a field effect transistor (FET). These are different designs. In particular, the FET is a voltage-driven device. There's a *voltage* applied to the middle pin, but it doesn't result in any *current* flowing to or from the middle pin. A really cool elaboration on this design is to leave a disconnected gate in a FET, and then you get flash memory.
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, I know I used the wrong symbol. Sorry. You aren't the first person to point it out
@lifenator975
@lifenator975 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the beautiful explanation Gary 👏👏
@nigelgunn322
@nigelgunn322 Жыл бұрын
Great video. It amazes me that, with the costs you have described, I can buy a packaged multi-core microcontroller chip for less than a dollar. The smaller chips we're playing with at home are remarkable value.
@_Digitalguy
@_Digitalguy 3 жыл бұрын
Facinating video Gary! Thanks!
@gigihanmandarin
@gigihanmandarin 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you professor for explaining!
@dsidrius
@dsidrius 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome explanation Gary! Seeing the 68000 views this video currently has reminded me of the Motorola 68k introduced in 1979, which was named as such because it had 68000 transistors, and was a chip used by things like the Sega Genesis, Amiga, Apple and NEXT systems well into the mid 90s. It was considered high end at the time, but pales heavily in comparison to today's microprocessors! Pretty incredible to think that we're now at billions of transistors some 40 years on, a 14000x increase!! And in systems that run on a small battery and fits in your pocket, no less!
@superpandabacon
@superpandabacon 2 жыл бұрын
Wow! Been looking for this info for so long. Thank you! Now to find how cpu cache and instructions work and how it’s implemented in these tiny transistors
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 2 жыл бұрын
I have some videos on how CPUs work plus a video about cache memory.
@superpandabacon
@superpandabacon 2 жыл бұрын
@@GaryExplains Cool! Just came across this video out of the blue and subbed after watching it. Will check it out when I get home. Thank you!
@alex.jr2002
@alex.jr2002 3 жыл бұрын
Love the way how Gary get excited when talk about this topics. Great mate!
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@MrJayrot
@MrJayrot 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for explaning the works of the transistors
@dread69420
@dread69420 3 жыл бұрын
This did a pretty amazing explanation for a 25 minute video, although ISAs weren't touched upon as much.
@motherofallemails
@motherofallemails 3 жыл бұрын
Great video! it's worth also checking out ASML stepper video 👀, just to get a peek at the internals of that magnificent state-of-the-art masterpiece! 💍
@JordanEves
@JordanEves 2 жыл бұрын
Gary, thank you for N-type and P-type semiconductors and logic. I had almost imagined this.
@tylershepard4269
@tylershepard4269 2 жыл бұрын
As an RF/mmWave graduate student I design MMICs so I’m somewhat familiar with some of these processes, but it still blows my mind the way the foundries are able to etch to sub micron level resolution.
@leledumbo
@leledumbo 3 жыл бұрын
Now we know why SD888 kinda sucks with thermals. Hope Qualcomm can secure TSMC slot for its next flagship.
@J_Quinn_Creates
@J_Quinn_Creates 3 жыл бұрын
Very good job, Gary!👍👍
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!
@gelfandothea
@gelfandothea Жыл бұрын
This was very well done.
@BrucesWorldofStuff
@BrucesWorldofStuff 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks Gary! This is a awesome video that only you could do! Thanks for the video! LLAP BTW love the music. Feels like I'm watching a episode of 'This Old House" ... :-)
@1MarkKeller
@1MarkKeller 3 жыл бұрын
lol, true!
@alexandermyrthue1987
@alexandermyrthue1987 2 жыл бұрын
13:45 I will remember that chartch. THANKS Gary!!!!!!!!
@peanutbutter604
@peanutbutter604 3 жыл бұрын
Love it. Best explanation ever Thank you
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@Sinn0100
@Sinn0100 2 жыл бұрын
This is very interesting and I have enjoyed it quite a bit. I would love to see you discuss gaming and how some of the newer tech is built. Like for example what is a Cuda Core exactly and how are they built?
@Dimich1993
@Dimich1993 3 жыл бұрын
This is a great short explanation, Gary!
@RevNicholasJonsson
@RevNicholasJonsson 3 жыл бұрын
A brilliant and informative video Gary. Excellent!! Well done. You explained it really well. Looking forward to seeing you in the next one. 😊
@earnistse4899
@earnistse4899 3 жыл бұрын
I’ve always loved deep tech dives like this , my inner geek is unleashed lol. How did you learn all this your self Gary? University or self taught
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
I have a computer science related honors degree plus I was a professional software engineer for 10+ years. But I do a lot of research for every video.
@earnistse4899
@earnistse4899 3 жыл бұрын
@@GaryExplains that’s awesome Gary , if possible I would love you to do videos breaking down a die shot of something like the 888. I haven’t been able to find a shot of it or the die size anywhere. I want to do so to try and get an idea of Samsung’s 5nm lpe
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
While something like that would be great, I don't have access to any special/secret information. If you can't find a shot of it then probably I can't either. It looks like Tech Insights has some die shots, but you need to pay for them: www.techinsights.com/products/ace-2101-801
@earnistse4899
@earnistse4899 3 жыл бұрын
@@GaryExplains thanks so much Gary , best wishes from the USA
@harrkev
@harrkev 2 жыл бұрын
Note that masks are only over a million dollars for the leading-edge stuff. For really old processes (well over 100nm) the mask sets might only be tens of thousands of dollars. Obviously the higher resolution needed for the smaller geometries are reflected by the higher resolution needed for the mask set. Larger geometries are MUCH easier to make. Larger geometries are also more refined (years of practice making wafers) so the yields are better, and the machines have largely been paid for over the years. As you go to smaller process nodes, you also need more expensive EDA tools. Cadence sells an "advanced node" license that you need on top of the license to use the layout tool. Once you need to factor in the wavelength of light, the mask sets can start to look more like diffraction gratings (not that I have any personal experience in anything so small), so the tool makers want more money to turn on such features. But if you are making something that is pad-limited (the number of IO pads put a limit on how small the die can be), then you can either put more transistors in the core area (add features, memory, etc.), or you can just use larger transistors to save a few bucks.
@mgkole
@mgkole 3 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed this video, Gary you are really 5nm, billions of transistors, you are the best!!!!!!!!
@AbcDef-el9jl
@AbcDef-el9jl 2 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation...! Got to know so much about manufacturing. Thank you.
@racecar_spelled_backwards868
@racecar_spelled_backwards868 3 жыл бұрын
21:45 Do they get close to 100% yield from the wafers nowadays? I remember reading (back in the 80's) yields were around 33% so the majority of chips on the wafer were useless junk. Some could be "salvaged" by either down-clocking, or disabling functionality (AMD did this with the 29000. If the MMU or Branch Target Cache failed, they'd sell the chip as a 29005 which had neither). If they really usually get full yields out of the wafers, that really shows how far things have come along.
@QkslvrZ
@QkslvrZ 3 жыл бұрын
I would be surprised if they did. I did yield analysis in the 80's, and for manufacturing yield it was mostly broken into photo resist flaws, and contamination. For the new fabs they constructed, they would not hire smokers for any fab jobs, no perfumes, anything that smelled was not allowed in the clean rooms. more rarely there were missed layers, and other stupid stuff, those everything failed. And you're right about slower clocks, but there might not have even been a cpu designed without the MMU or cache, that would probably be a sales vs yield trade off.
@arturosandoval205
@arturosandoval205 2 жыл бұрын
Not at all, a 100% is almost impossible to get. For new technologies though, a 60% yield is seen as quite problematic, so depending on the node you want to be in the 80% range. Another thing is that yield is not only determined by the foundry processes but also by the design. There are DFM rules that have different levels of priority and if followed will increase the yield of the circuit. But these come with tradeoffs so not always do you want to follow all these recommended rules (for example you may increase the area usage or affect the bandwidth of your design if you follow them).
@mdrew44628
@mdrew44628 2 жыл бұрын
People were always the major causes of contamination in a cleanroom. In modern fabs, people have mostly been eliminated from the process core and the wafers move automatically from process to process. However, line width has also shrunken so now much smaller pieces of foreign material will cause problems. It would be very surprising if the yield was 100%. It could very well be 80/90% though.
@paulf5351
@paulf5351 2 жыл бұрын
I decided to nitpick the nitpickers. :-) The transistors are P and N CMOS transistors. NMs are 2D measurements. Could the 7nm ??? be from a third a third dimension?
@shresthsonkar9207
@shresthsonkar9207 3 жыл бұрын
How are those colourful images of dies (die shots) taken? Delided CPUs usually looks just quite opaque black slab
@voytechj
@voytechj 3 жыл бұрын
Those dies are not finished yet. Later on they will be covered with a lot of copper and μBumps will be made if flip-chip technology will be used. You saw the wrong side of a die, but other side still has protected layer that you can remove with small grid sand paper.
@circuit10
@circuit10 2 жыл бұрын
Aren't they just diagrams or false-colour or something?
@circuit10
@circuit10 2 жыл бұрын
Actually never mind, I think voytechj is right
@minus3dbintheteens60
@minus3dbintheteens60 3 жыл бұрын
Great job, man that has to be the best video on the topic on all of KZfaq!
@unlokia
@unlokia 3 жыл бұрын
You clearly haven’t watched “silicon run“ then
@andreaswagner4003
@andreaswagner4003 2 жыл бұрын
best explanations for this field I have ever come across. Cheers, Gary
@alexjohnjacob6318
@alexjohnjacob6318 3 жыл бұрын
There are also the EDA companies like Cadence,Synopsys,Mentor Graphics , which makes the software for the designing the chip.
@TechieXP
@TechieXP 3 жыл бұрын
So now that we know how a Processor/SoC/GPU is made per se, how does the processor actually crunch data. Because basically the processor is processing billions of 1' and 0's and how does that translate to what we see on the screen.
@QkslvrZ
@QkslvrZ 3 жыл бұрын
You did a good job on this, but you showed mosfets cross sections, and bipolar transistor schematics. Since the logic circuits are quite a bit different(and they are mostly mosfets in modern cpu designs), you should try to fix that if you can :) Also an interesting related topic is power use is mostly switching speed, as the state of the nodes change, it is mostly just charging and discharging gate and interconnect capacitance. Which is why power use is so related to clock speed and cooling is dependent on Watts/chip area. Cray Research estimated you could air cool 100W/sq inch, and 200 for liquid cooling.
@movingloz
@movingloz 2 жыл бұрын
OMGAWD. Thanks 🙏 for the vid.
@elvinsworld11
@elvinsworld11 3 жыл бұрын
Nicely explained
@sonjaeckstein3532
@sonjaeckstein3532 2 жыл бұрын
9:28 the picture on the right shows an n-channel mosfet
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, I made a mistake. You aren't the first person to point it out.
@thaernejem7317
@thaernejem7317 3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting info! Thanks a lot
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
My pleasure!
@nullnull5185
@nullnull5185 2 жыл бұрын
Props to the guys who services the ASML machines
@petermolnar6017
@petermolnar6017 3 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video, thank you! Could you please make a footage about ARM's role in this process?
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
I think that maybe I covered that enough in videos like Arm vs x86, or Arm vs RISC-V. If you have watched those and you think there is still some gaps that I need to fill then please let me know.
@markharrisllb
@markharrisllb 2 жыл бұрын
As transistors and logic gates are getting closer and closer to the size of the silicon atom, do you not think it’s making the work Xanadu and quantum computing more viable? Then we can start again making them smaller and smaller.
@abhijitg5345
@abhijitg5345 2 жыл бұрын
Amazing stuff Garry!!!!
@garrytuohy9267
@garrytuohy9267 Жыл бұрын
Nicely summarized and in under 30 mimutes. It was important to comment on the RISC-V hype. Unless they have access to a huge amount of near obsolete manufacturing capacity it is not going to be cheap to manufacture. And good luck competing with the Automotive Industry for that capacity. Generally, these type of manufacturing processes have limited capacity, so there won't be much of a revolution if you cannot supply enough of the chips. And you are not going to threaten the hegemony with processors that are order of magnatude slower. They would need to use that same, very expensive, Process Nodes as the leasding processors.
@boredom2
@boredom2 2 жыл бұрын
That was extremely interesting. Thanks!
@nickharrison3748
@nickharrison3748 3 жыл бұрын
Good info. Nicely explained.
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@glowinthedark9082
@glowinthedark9082 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Very simple to learn for people who've heard basic terms before
@Esk-imo
@Esk-imo 2 жыл бұрын
This was amazing thank you!
@B21_raider
@B21_raider 3 жыл бұрын
Great video very well explained
@sandeepk5089
@sandeepk5089 2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video Gary, thanks for this!
@Abdo70t
@Abdo70t 2 жыл бұрын
woooow great explanation for a very complicated topic in such a beautiful and understandable way
@wundyboy
@wundyboy 2 жыл бұрын
great video... superbly explained! Unbelievable what we can create nowadays!
@alfonsoPina
@alfonsoPina 2 жыл бұрын
great explanation but I was really hoping to see a little more detail. I know we can't just get random videos inside intel and AMD but I was kinda hoping for something more visual. However, this is one of the best explanations I've seen, sending to my nephews to let them see and learn. Thanks Gary
@mdrew44628
@mdrew44628 2 жыл бұрын
Because most of the processing is done inside machines, you won't see much. The few clips he did show is a good representation of the entire process overall; just wafers being loaded into hundreds of different machines. You should be able to look up all the different steps and get a detailed understanding of each process, but to do that in a single video would be hours long.
@nick_g
@nick_g 3 жыл бұрын
This is the explanation we NEED
@martin-samsoe
@martin-samsoe 3 жыл бұрын
Love your videos... this one was especially interresting 👍
@peternzioki4555
@peternzioki4555 3 жыл бұрын
Great video Gary
@dipanshubiswas890
@dipanshubiswas890 3 жыл бұрын
Sir it becomes so hard to even imagine the steps that goes through churning a microscopic transistor from a CD type silicon wafer...what happens to those Dutch machines after the process node becomes outdated? Do they make new machines for different process nodes, if yes then is there any use for like 28nm machines in todays time sir?
@QkslvrZ
@QkslvrZ 3 жыл бұрын
They tend to keep being used for older designs if they are still in production.
@repatch43
@repatch43 3 жыл бұрын
@9:23 Nitpick alert! The symbol is for a bipolar junction transistor, the picture is of a MOSFET. MOSFET symbol is different.
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, several other people have made the same nitpick. My bad. I have already beaten myself so that I don't make the same mistake again.
@ady909
@ady909 2 жыл бұрын
Great video, thanks!
@law-abiding-criminal
@law-abiding-criminal 3 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately there will be a delay of a few years for the delivery of high NA EUV Maschines from ASML. So they have to use multi pattering for EUV. 😢
@lafcadiothelion
@lafcadiothelion 3 жыл бұрын
That was great, excellent explanation. Very informative.
@karehaqt
@karehaqt 3 жыл бұрын
Intel also have chips built by TSMC as well.
@autohmae
@autohmae 3 жыл бұрын
Roughly 10:30 that was the best explanation I've ever seen on these things. Bringing all the pieces together. Same with the ASML segment. Verry good ! People say, abundant sand, but what these companies need is white sand (like you might find at beaches) which is far, far less abundant. Beach sand prices have been going up. It's also used for buildings (cement). From an article in 2018: "a cubic meter of sand selling for as much as £62 in areas of high demand and scarce supply." Supposedly their is a sand mafia and at times it can get people killed. It threatens wildlife ecological systems, etc. People are working on some solutions for buildings: "A win-win solution is the use of waste plastic in making concrete. Research suggests small particles of plastic waste - “plastic sand” - can replace 10% of the natural sand in concrete, saving at least 800m tonnes per year." Recently had an other reminder on history; mainframe -> minicomputer -> microcomputer. And it seems to me we are now moving to the next step: SOC as laptop/desktop (chromebooks already did this, Apple M1 also).
@vapourmile
@vapourmile 3 жыл бұрын
@Gary Explains: You know what I want explained? WHO makes them? We know what the companies names are but I don't know why we don't know who any of the designers are. It can't be just one genius. What are the names of the people who design the chips and why aren't they famous? I'd like that explained! Not just one or two industry figureheads but the teams. :)
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
I guess that never happens in any industry. I don't know the team behind car designs, or ship designs, or airplane designs etc.
@alexlandherr
@alexlandherr 2 жыл бұрын
At 2:38, so The Beatles had IC manufacturing capabilities…?
@ArnabBasak89
@ArnabBasak89 3 жыл бұрын
Somewhere I read source of silicon is not sand but quartz crystals.
@shresthsonkar9207
@shresthsonkar9207 3 жыл бұрын
It’s purer, just that. Refining is easier and cheaper for quartz as it’s having proportionally less impurity against, say, just Norma sand in desert or beaches.
@Ginko491
@Ginko491 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, professor.
@pauleshel427
@pauleshel427 3 жыл бұрын
Present from the Philippines
@johng7rwf419
@johng7rwf419 3 жыл бұрын
That was a nice refresher...
@krombopuloslincler4849
@krombopuloslincler4849 2 жыл бұрын
Please do not stop making videos about electronic hardware ever. Humanity will be sad if you do.
@singularity8943
@singularity8943 2 жыл бұрын
So if a cpu has say 2 cores that have failed, does the manufacture label it as a lesser chip?
@michaelmoran2022
@michaelmoran2022 Жыл бұрын
A1 explanation thank you👍👍👍
@ssekisambusulaiman4192
@ssekisambusulaiman4192 2 жыл бұрын
Am glade I found this page
@axelBr1
@axelBr1 3 жыл бұрын
Your description and image of/for transistors is for the original Bipolar Junction Transistor, but all CPUs use MOSFET (MOS) transistors, (generally an N-MOS and P-MOS transistor coupled together to form a Complementary gate (C-MOS) "transistor"). The symbols are different and MOS transistors switch based on voltage and not current.
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
Indeed. Sorry about that. You are the third or fourth person to point it out. But if that is the only error that people are finding in a 25 minute video on a complex topic then I am happy! :-)
@aveekbh
@aveekbh 3 жыл бұрын
And it doesn't help that a lot of introductory material on transistors will describe BJTs (bipolar junction transistors). The FETs (field effect transistors) work mainly based on voltage (drawing almost no current on the gate - the middle bit - when not switching). Side note - That's one of the reasons you see power consumption scaling with operating frequency. Hence, CPU frequency scaling became a big thing about 15 years ago.
@nyikoluckyhendrickz
@nyikoluckyhendrickz 2 жыл бұрын
Gary you do explain no doubt that's why love ur contents always
@joey199412
@joey199412 3 жыл бұрын
I wonder why there's such a steep price difference between 14nm and 7nm per chip design. Is it the mask that makes up most of the difference? Because the per-wafer costs are $5000 vs $5800 it feels very weird for the design to be $80m vs $271m
@kigasdj2
@kigasdj2 3 жыл бұрын
because it is more complicated to fit more transistors in the same space, you need more sophisticated mask, which as Gary said cost a lot to make it, especially you need those expensive lithography machines you can churn out those 7nm cpu's, more complications more raise in cost
@tohjingwei9703
@tohjingwei9703 3 жыл бұрын
When you shrink the transistor to smaller sizes, the yield from a single wafer becomes lesser due to increase complexity that leads to errors. So, to overcome this yield problem, new technologies must be developed and used which increases the R&D cost. There is also enhancement to the transistor technology itself in order to cope with quantum channeling. If you notice, there are a revisions to the FinFET transistors and in the coming years, GAA FET to make shrinking down furthers possible. Is it very common to have exponentially higher cost when upgrading to a newer nodes. This is why economies of scale is important for fabs
@roadrage9191
@roadrage9191 2 жыл бұрын
Good work, very high level but a good overview.
@rockymeto
@rockymeto 3 жыл бұрын
Aliens are in earth extracting silicon which is in abundance so they don't reveal themselves to us 😂 but in future, aliens will attack earth for processors we make 😁
@rjorgebrssa2
@rjorgebrssa2 3 жыл бұрын
Gary, review your technical explanations, you presented a MOS transistor structure, but a BIPOLAR transistor diagram.
@GaryExplains
@GaryExplains 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I know. Sorry about that. Several others have pointed that out. But if that is all there is to complain about in a 25 minute video on a complex subject then I am happy.
@kalpavrukshg8853
@kalpavrukshg8853 3 жыл бұрын
The companies should change their matrix the node number is obsolete and density is one of the better option
@yapolloable
@yapolloable 3 жыл бұрын
wow he really did explain it.
@mrlazda
@mrlazda 2 жыл бұрын
IBM is not fabless, they produce their own processors based on their own design (POWER9), and systems based on that processors, which make them only company which do that (Samsung licence ARM so it is not 100% their design). If we look at companies which make their own design around ARM their are lot of companies what have their own semiconductor fabrication plants (ST, TI ...).
@grahamdougherty226
@grahamdougherty226 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent video.
Why next-gen chips separate Data & Power
18:56
High Yield
Рет қаралды 165 М.
Arm vs RISC V- What You Need to Know
22:19
Gary Explains
Рет қаралды 303 М.
ISSEI & yellow girl 💛
00:33
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
How I Did The SELF BENDING Spoon 😱🥄 #shorts
00:19
Wian
Рет қаралды 36 МЛН
Survive 100 Days In Nuclear Bunker, Win $500,000
32:21
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 160 МЛН
Logo Matching Challenge with Alfredo Larin Family! 👍
00:36
BigSchool
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
The Race to Build a Perfect Computer Chip
26:02
Bloomberg Originals
Рет қаралды 800 М.
If There is a Chip Shortage Then Why Not Just Make More Chips?
9:53
Gary Explains
Рет қаралды 163 М.
How does Computer Memory Work? 💻🛠
35:33
Branch Education
Рет қаралды 3,8 МЛН
How This New Battery is Changing the Game
12:07
Undecided with Matt Ferrell
Рет қаралды 143 М.
Unix vs Linux
13:59
Gary Explains
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
Why Lego Is So Expensive | So Expensive | Business Insider
28:18
Business Insider
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
New Disruptive Microchip Technology and The Secret Plan of Intel
19:59
Anastasi In Tech
Рет қаралды 436 М.
Solid Hydrogen Explained (Again) - Is it the Future of Energy Storage?
13:05
Undecided with Matt Ferrell
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
ISSEI & yellow girl 💛
00:33
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН