Gillies and Reid are surnames originating from Scotland. Zisserman sounds rather German....😂😂😂

Will your next video be about Frank Lampard’s shot against the Germans which went about a foot over the goal line but wasn’t allowed ? Or will you just accept what most people with common sense have accepted, that you get some decisions and don’t get others ?

​@@apb3440 exactly

Most people with common sense don't argue with the truth

Emotive rubbish. My sincerest apologies to the gullible of this post. The angle of perspective is more than other camera angles. It doesn't matter how close it is if the frame didn't show the impact of the bounce beyond the line. Where is the splattered paint on a boiling hot day? It was repainted at full time.,and this was ten minutes in. The official was right.being a better angle of perspective than any camera. No need to grovel to impassioned objectors. Shame, even if 1 cm of curvature would be measure by a modern VAR..

Exactly.

I'm old enough to remember both matches. Absolutely not a slightly miniscule pale chanche in hell, earth, heaven or purgatory, for England to win any of these 2 matches, even with different referees decisions.

@asevado I'm not saying England would have won those matches, I'm talking about refereeing decisions where clear goals have been disallowed. That's what I was referring to when I said you win some, you lose some.

And you moaned like fuck about it.

Yes exactly , we were cheated out of potentially winning the world cup for the second time many times 🤔🤫

Where did Cohen mysteriously appear from to cross the ball ? I doubt he was even in the German half !!!

@@maconescotland8996 My thoughts exactly! Had to go and rewatch the original clip to make sure I was neither going mad nor was it one of the most profound 'Mandela effects' of all time!

Yeah he was off balance because his first touch was awful - then he scooped the shot. No goal. We were lucky.

@@longjon120We weren’t lucky we were the better team throughout the tournament and in the final.

Correct. 100 %

@@longjon120Was going to say exactly that. Poor first touch. The defender allowed him so much room too. Ball was never over the line .

Yes lucky

The biggest fallacy in the history of football is that the linesman was from Russia! He was from Azerbaijan.

@@johnmanning5568 it was not fallacy because the dominant nation in Soviet Union were russians, and Azerbaijan was not independent since it was part of Soviet Union

@@Masda.X I agree that the dominant nation was Russia but the linesman wasn’t born and didn’t live in that country. He was born and lived in Azerbaijan, which was, as you say, part of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Azerbaijan was incorporated into the USSR in 1920 and was officially named as the Azerbaijani Soviet Socialist Republic. The country of Azerbaijan didn’t cease to exist. He was an Azerbaijani citizen who was part of the USSR. The linesman in 1966 was not a Russian citizen, he was an Azerbaijani citizen. The country of Azerbaijan still existed even though it wasn’t an independent state. A citizen of that proud nation would NEVER say that he was a Russian citizen.

@@johnmanning5568 It would be absurd if he said he is russian citizen because it does not make sense, during that era all Soviet people always proudly said they were citizen of Soviet Union. there were no nationalism in SSR, but socialism/communism. Why any would say that ? Only after the collapse of SSR, people started to emphasize the nationality of major figures more and more ...

Look at Roger Hunt's reaction he's in no doubt and doesn't even attempt to play a ball that should have been begging to be knocked over the line. It's a goal.

Very true. Plus when you see it at fast speed it looks well over the line, I don't trust any AI bullsh*t these days

I've always maintained that point when away claims the match was fixed

Swiss...German-speaking ref...linesman...from Azerbaijan...who took a pounding from the Nazis...just 20-odd years before. Obvious it was over the line...on a moral plane! 😂😂😂😂 😢😢

what do you wish for christmas?

When Hurst hit it watching it live I knew it wasn't a goal in 1966

poor respond

​@@m.u.550correct respond.

You can't even string a sentence together

Calm down Waleed. 😂

No it was a goal and a deserved win for England.

No it wasn't !

@@williamcaldwell-smith3865 fully deserved win for England no doubt about it.

It doesn't work like that. When you play extra time and is 2-2 you don't have to take a big risk and attack harder which makes your defence weaker and more likely to concede another goal. When is 2-3 already you have to that. This is one of examples. We also can talk about psychical effects of losing goal in that situation what lower morale for sure. So that's very stupid theory and far away from sport reality....

@@matthiasdominik4049As if they wouldn't attack for the winner anyway and lose to the counterattack. Sour grapes.

Huge

Why did you continue to argue after calling "end of argument"?

Because it wasn't a goal !

@@williamcaldwell-smith3865 but it was, check the score....

The game was better before VAR. The human error of the officials was all part of the fun. I would welcome goal line technology for the Hurst / Lampard situations, but that's all.

There's many to slip between the cup and the lip, you know 🤗

Exactly!!

absolutely - it was MILES over.

England might have scored even more. Deal with it.

Surprised you didn't blame the Russian linesman (don't mention the war) okay i won't haha....

Karma returned the favour with Frank Lampard's 2010 goal not given in world Cup quarter final.

@@tommaguzzi1723 Why did England deserve bad karma? It was the linesman who gave the goal. Besides, Hurst scored another legit goal with the last kick of the game. People like the German in the OP will argue what may have happened had the third been disallowed, well it works both ways doesn't it? England won the World Cup in '66, deal with it.

Aber meine Deutscher freund, Deutschland gewann 1970, 1972 und in den nachsten 30 jahren jedes pflichtspiel gegen England.

Probably a 1/4 over

out of 81010101029829200 people only 6k saw this video in 6 years and I see a comment of 2 hours ago

Doubtful at that speed and short distance

Ohne Zweifel war der Ball nicht mit vollen Umfang über die Linie

Irrelevant. If Hurst’s goal hadn’t been given then Germany wouldn’t have played with eleven men in the English half!

1967 Theres your consolation 😉 And decades of so called ‘top flight football’ in the Premiership contest between 2 teams

The last goal wasnt valid because there were supporters on the pitch. England have NEVER won the world cup. it was given

@@maxpathan7927 If you went through the history of the world cup, and looked for goals that should or shouldn't have been given, you would have to change a lot of history. England won the world cup, just look it up. We even beat the team of the tournament, Portugal.

@@paulmann9154 True, but so many bad calls, all in the favour of the home team. Bit dodgy

@@maxpathan7927 One bad call. The 4th goal, a few people came onto the pitch, but as I was once told by a referee: you play to the whistle.

​You talk out of your...

Och aye, the nu! Those thieving sasanachs.

You believe a Scottish comment about an England goal???

LOL I see what you did there

We’ll never hear the end of it.

England didn't cheat the linesman confirmed it's a goal.

Yeah it WAS!...WE WON 4-2....😂🤣

....a clear 6 inches over the line!...

Until you actually look at the facts and discover that on the four occasions England have played Germany in competitive matches this century, England have won 3 and Germany 1.

You think its work like that? Bullshit. How do you know there would be 4th goal without 3rd? Theres 2-2 in extra time so you don't have to attack with more players and take a risk to concede a goal. When you are losing 2-3 situation is totally different. That's first thing. Another one is lower morale after losing a goal. That's far away from reality what you've said and I've heard many times before.

Listen my friend, I played semi pro football for many years so do not preach to me about IFS buts and maybe s, 4- 2 end of.

Didn't even reach the line 😂

Not if you are a German - or a Scot !!! 😂 If only VAR had been in use back then !!!

@maconescotland8996 The Germans are not fixated with it, they have 4 world cups so have no need to be but Scotland, well they were not even good enough to qualify.

@@user-qt3dg3qn6x England only qualified as hosts, then again in 1970 as holders - we all know what happened in 1974 and 1978. 🤣

@maconescotland8996 Yes, you failed to put more than 2 past Zaire and failed to get anything against Cuba and just a point v lran. Very embarrassing. 😅🤣😂

​@@user-qt3dg3qn6x Oh dear !!! Hardly embarrassing as it would be difficult to get a result against Cuba - seeing as they last played in the World Cup 1938 and it wasn't against Scotland.😂

I also thought of this back in 2010. In 1966 I was only 5 years old and did not watch the match (I was not very much interested in football back then), but later, when I became a football fan and watched documentaries and listened to the accounts of those who had active fans by 1966, I had an impression that the goal acknowledged by the refs was at least suspicious.

LOL but Lampards was over the line by a kilometer. karma never misses.

@@df289 Karma never misses? Karma misses at least half the time! Bad things happen to good people and vice versa.

Och aye the jocks have totally moved on haven't they 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

We don't need to move on, Jock. We won!

Show us one.

No, Maradona knowingly cheated, that's not justice.

@@StonyStevenson75 That's right! Maybe it was the Devil's revenge😈⚽🖐🤔

Even now when I watch it and see and hear the reaction it still cracks me up. It was brilliant.😂

Well done linesman, he would have seen the effect of the paint.

When England had 2 crocked players...& no substitutes...but the Scots were brilliant players then. Good luck v Germany Jocks!

Sincerely, I cannot say for certain. I am glad England has won, but still I am not sure.