Thank you for your comment! And feedvack is always welcome!! I am glad to hear that ypu like the content, and if ypu do send the name of the source I will make sure to say it correctly in the next videos 🙂

Thanks for you comment!! I hope soon. I was making this video and because it was too long, it will be two separate videos. So now I already have most of the text done for the next 😄

we are waiting sir🥸@@eversbrothersproductions1476

Descartes cogito is one derived from observation of one's own thought and the necessary conclusion of an agent (the I) being the bearer, the one who thinks that thought. Fichte's I=I on the other hand is the transcendental a prior condition of any judgment, more specific the principle of identity (A=A). Fichte's point is before formal Logic there needs to be a transcendental Logic, a Principle which grounds it while in Descartes he really simply makes a judgment out of empirical observation (his own thoughts) and concludes there must be an agent of that thought, which considering his radical skeptical attitude is simply a mistake. Fichte did call radical/dogmatic sceptisim out in a footnote iirc stating it cant be a system of organazing thought since it itself is sceptical of all systems

@@petscop2604 I wanted to reply to the comment, but you did a wonderful job explaining! You seem to know a lot about Fichte, how come? And what did you think of the video? 😄😄

If A is 0 it is then nothing and if its nothing there can be no contradiction for there is nothing which can be contradicted.If you say that you do not care about existence there is no contradiction since if 0 is nothing,which it is, the formulation reads as "not nothing is not nothing" which is a completely valid judgment

If A is 0, then -0 (whatever it is, even if i is an impossibility) is not equal to 0 for the same subject. The whole point is that the content of A does not matter. Also, the comment of @Petscop2 is also a good way of looking at it.