Kant's Transcendental Aesthetic
17:02
Lacan's Graphs of Desire: Part II
18:23
Lacan's Graphs of Desire: Part I
17:33
The Psychology of "Don't Look Up"
14:32
The Concept of Alienation (Karl Marx)
14:16
Пікірлер
@IrkInvader
@IrkInvader 9 сағат бұрын
Thank you for these videos. I'm reading a few Psychoanalysis books lately (currently Zupancic's What IS sex) and your videos have been EXTREMELY helpful. I still think tha part regarding desire (graphs 3 and 4) miss the point of desire. Several queer friends and I have been discussing this. Lacans explanation of desire seems very heteronormative. Do you know if there is anyone with a good critique of Lacans formulas of desire? Thanks again for your work. I will watch all your vids for sure!!! <3
@hippodino4965
@hippodino4965 3 күн бұрын
An time goes by, now (5+7=12) is analytic statement.
@genuineletter
@genuineletter 5 күн бұрын
No, the mythical subject has nothing to do with the unconscious!!!!! The unconscious is on the top of the graph. the mythical subject is just a logical construction, it would be a subjcet before language, which actually does not exist - that is why Zizek calls it mythical
@zadig08
@zadig08 9 күн бұрын
This is great. Thanks!
@bozodorochenko8872
@bozodorochenko8872 10 күн бұрын
4:30 is actually mind boggling
@bazzermn
@bazzermn 13 күн бұрын
amazing explanation. thank you!
@gwendeseminat8r
@gwendeseminat8r 13 күн бұрын
thisi s dogmatic
@barnettcohen
@barnettcohen 23 күн бұрын
Super helpful in reading NO FUTURE by Edelman
@eceera
@eceera 23 күн бұрын
Man I'm not smart enough for this shiz
@allpainnogain5368
@allpainnogain5368 25 күн бұрын
you sound like my crush bro
@eversbrothersproductions1476
@eversbrothersproductions1476 25 күн бұрын
🤫😉
@umerwani1178
@umerwani1178 Ай бұрын
This is irrational,what kinda heros journey is this .give up world n wander naked in forests.this is cynical
@boathemian7694
@boathemian7694 Ай бұрын
Zizek has useful ideas occasionally, but his ignorance of Ecology doesn’t make him relevant or at all correct.
@derek3778
@derek3778 Ай бұрын
Well done, and you deserve more subscribers! Just subscribed!
@usudnik4561
@usudnik4561 Ай бұрын
Awesome, clear and concise!
@benjammin4840
@benjammin4840 Ай бұрын
These are so awesome. Thank you!
@frankteng
@frankteng Ай бұрын
Free will seems to be an evolution of our culture and religion to teach us to control the physical aspects of our life and thus have the cognitive free will to decide with the morality we have chosen
@frankteng
@frankteng Ай бұрын
This video was pretty awesome, As someone faced with the great challenge of life and dealt a shitty hand but also the option to climb out of it, it is weird to serve as inspiration for my brethren, to be stoped by a few people who tell me that I inspire them to b greater, that in this cesspool of degeneracy there is hope even for the lowly, that we should all aspire to be more and face the challenge of life with dignity
@damin1916
@damin1916 Ай бұрын
I searched "fichte", "fichte ego" and "fichte system". On all these searches this video did not come up! This video came to my recommended feed, I'm very happy it did because this is a very usefull video to me! I ordered his Wissenshaftslehre and it's being delivered in 2 weeks. I'm using my time untill then to prepare myself further and this video was a good resource that I will definitely be rewatching.
@kadaganchivinod8003
@kadaganchivinod8003 Ай бұрын
Is there going to be another video on Nietzsche?
@sharamandarata
@sharamandarata Ай бұрын
Why was Shopenhaur Niestche's enemy?
@eversbrothersproductions1476
@eversbrothersproductions1476 Ай бұрын
That's a good question! So basically Schopenhauer amd Nietzsche draw the same conclusion, namely that life is suffering. But for Schopenhauer the cure is to deny life. To retreat into philosophy and renounciation like the chistian priests. But for Nietzsche this philosophy is very dangerous and he blames Schopenhauer for creating a school that celebrates this denial. For Nietzsche we should celebrate life! Yes it is suffering, but we should embrace it and try to overcome, not avoid it, because we cannot avoid sufgering. No matter how hard we try. So they are the polar opposites of each other.
@frankteng
@frankteng Ай бұрын
As someone who has suffered greatly but has overcome I agree. This modern denial of life and suffering is wrong, it will only cause more suffering. I have burned myself in many fires and overcome inconceivable obstacles that these “intellectual” claim to care about but live in decadence and delusion and avoid the real solutions
@cuscardo
@cuscardo Ай бұрын
Marx didn't understand what capital is...he was confusing capital with money. Not that he didn't fundamentally understand it, but he maliciously leading people to a view of the world that would justify his lazy parasitical life style. He was evil and not just ignorant. He was in his own terms a Lumpenproletariat...although he didn't belong to the proletariat, he came from a very wealthy bourgeois family and he was married with an extremely wealthy aristocrat...it's hilarious to even dream that he had any concept of how it was to be from the working class...since he didn't work a single day of his life or even spoke with working class people. In short he was a fraud and marxism is a fiasco.
@intellectual421
@intellectual421 12 күн бұрын
capitalist detected opinion rejected
@silvio25432
@silvio25432 Ай бұрын
He has returned !
@timothymorton303
@timothymorton303 Ай бұрын
When I gave Slavoj a copy of my Ecology without Nature in 2007, he was profoundly influenced and started to broadcast the idea. He did eventually cite me (in In Defense of Lost Causes): "brilliant"; and since then we've done dialogues (for example in Real Review 2021), and we email back and forth. I'm acknowledging him in my new book Hell: Towards a Christian Ecology, which came out just exactly when his one on Christian atheism came out.
@MacSmithVideo
@MacSmithVideo Ай бұрын
If Nietzsche was alive, he would have called this life denial. Embrace the wanting. These priests want you to sleep. Also, does he say anything about those desires that you realize that really do make you happy over time? This things do exist, even materialistic things like nice cars.
@eversbrothersproductions1476
@eversbrothersproductions1476 Ай бұрын
Really appreciate your comment! You know Nietzsche well and he would be proud. By chance our next video will be on Nietzsche. I do believe that philosophy could use some extra Nietzsche. 🙂
@MacSmithVideo
@MacSmithVideo Ай бұрын
Early psychology is such mystical nonsense, and French psychology is a thousand times worse.
@aahmadHv
@aahmadHv Ай бұрын
I have a question please … did he believed in universal and abstract entities as independent being ? If not then how he thought of them ?
@hohlikco7596
@hohlikco7596 Ай бұрын
your insights are always spot on and truly inspiring. I did notice the prounpuncation of Gichte's name is wuite off ( i've dtruggled a lot, science months avtually if i shall mention it), i'm not german but öive here over a decade therfore i thought adressing it might qualify as something constructive. Because Fichtes name is also a name for a particular tree type its quite easy to find great audio ressources... i don't wanna name them to not sound as an ad. Im sorry to mention such a tiny thing, but it clushes with the genius contenet. Sorry. Dont hate me! Keep up the fantastic work! 🎉
@eversbrothersproductions1476
@eversbrothersproductions1476 Ай бұрын
Thank you for your comment! And feedvack is always welcome!! I am glad to hear that ypu like the content, and if ypu do send the name of the source I will make sure to say it correctly in the next videos 🙂
@hohlikco7596
@hohlikco7596 Ай бұрын
thank you! thank you for everything you huys have done. Ans gor a shelter for my mind in any tie of the day. thanks
@Ambiguousss
@Ambiguousss Ай бұрын
Thank you for making this video!
@richardfraser7024
@richardfraser7024 Ай бұрын
Thank you
@elintia
@elintia Ай бұрын
To think that what makes us human beings miserable is called objet petit a…
@mastermati773
@mastermati773 Ай бұрын
This video is so damn good. I swear Lacan is complicated. The barrier to entry is like nothing else. And you put it so clearly.
@danielbrockman1221
@danielbrockman1221 2 ай бұрын
I found this really annoying and it did not explain anything at all it was just a string of jargon words next to each other
@danielbrockman1221
@danielbrockman1221 2 ай бұрын
sophistry
@SystemScientist
@SystemScientist 2 ай бұрын
Thanks. Very understandable😊
@MacSmithVideo
@MacSmithVideo 2 ай бұрын
I'm inclined to agree with schoppenhauer that the German idealists totally missed what Kant was about, and got lost in the conceptual.
@tomschuelke7955
@tomschuelke7955 2 ай бұрын
Who ever states that ecology tells, green paradise is ecology, never understood what's about. Ecology studies the interconnected relations in which organisms aquire what they need to survive. Its often cruel, but never the less we know now that all organisms totaly depend on the networks and energy and material flows of the whole ecospere. At least we depend totaly on the free lifesupport that nature delivers. To tell this doesn't exist is Bullshit. Furtheremore we now understand that these are complex self organising systems, prone to tippingpoint scan thresholds, that can drive them into extremely fast changes where they can switch from one quasi equilibrium in another. These are the danger, because we can push them exceedingly strong, and it changes longtime linear, befor nonlinear changes totaly chaotic change the system untill it falls into another stable Refugium. To ignore this is absolute stupid, because humankind has never ever been more dependant on nature it is a part of, then ever before
@jonathanmoore5619
@jonathanmoore5619 2 ай бұрын
Enjoying your work. Thank you very much.
@theeskatelife
@theeskatelife 2 ай бұрын
this assumes that people do things only for a desired outcome. that we think by doing x,y,z we will be happy. but that isn't necessarily why people do things at all. this theory tries to make universal claims about the way people think and there is just no way you can do that
@theeskatelife
@theeskatelife 2 ай бұрын
this theory only holds if you believe that desire is the most important thing. but i dont mind not desiring anything once i obtain it. so i dont miss that loss. why does it give so much emphasis on desire being the thing we value most?
@lucassiccardi8764
@lucassiccardi8764 2 ай бұрын
Very interesting topic! There's so little about Fichte, thanks for this. What about a video on Novalis? His philosophy is relevant in this very context and it's even less analysed than Fichte's. Keep up the good work, cheers!
@ahmadhussain2136
@ahmadhussain2136 2 ай бұрын
Someone should also write a book on "How to read Zizek"! 😂
@b.o.e.t.h.i.u.s
@b.o.e.t.h.i.u.s 2 ай бұрын
Radical and interesting contrarianism by Zizek, but at bottom he is surprisingly unwise here. Has he ever spent a week in the wild even once? I doubt it. Yet he “knows” nature is a dead end. 😂 He is blatantly ignoring quality for quantity. He is throwing out the wisdom of thousands of indigenous civilizations in favor of our modern “civilized” society which is undoubtedly one of the least ethical, least sensitive, and least happy ever to have lived. The true harmony of nature is not “things never change”, “death doesn’t happen” or “life is painless”. The harmony of nature which he so badly misunderstands is more like: “Time is cyclical. Beauty transcends the individual. In spite of my death, life on Earth will go on.” It is this deep spiritual confidence in life’s persistence that comes from being present in and in tune with the natural environment, which our sick industrial society threatens and destroys so callously and pointlessly. Like Nietzsche explained: Schopenhauer was sick. Lamenting all this pain everywhere and giving up on organic life is not a sign of great empathy or wisdom, but of physical and mental illness. Today most of us are trained from birth to hide behind our stupid comforts - TV, painkillers, cars, computers - never realizing that the more we run to our artificial comforts and distractions, the weaker we become, the less we are able to bear the reality of Earth, and the more we seek to escape to some fake techno-utopia. Check out Ludwig Klages’ “Man and Earth” for a great opposing view and counterpoint to Zizek.
@Hadi.Najjar
@Hadi.Najjar 2 ай бұрын
Thank you. I'm almost done reading zizek's sublime object of ideology and this was very helpful 🙏🏻
@existentialexplorations4900
@existentialexplorations4900 2 ай бұрын
Very good.
@Schlynn
@Schlynn 2 ай бұрын
I just finished How to Read Lacan and this was a perfect next step to a deeper understanding to the three registers. Thank you.
@SupeHero00
@SupeHero00 2 ай бұрын
It seems to me a bit oversimplified. The will to live - what is actually the act of "living"?! When a subject experiences depression, does he still have the will to live? Is everything really the same will? Also regarding "suffering" - Is everything the same suffering? or are there different levels to it? do we always suffer or maybe it comes in certain waves? Is it inherently bad and negative like it seems to be portrayed (suffering vs happiness, life vs death) or maybe it's all complicated sensations though out time that we experience as part of life that we compress into simplified words to make our existence a little bit more coherent which in turn creates more suffering , negativity or sometimes positivity?
@draganbogdan4267
@draganbogdan4267 2 ай бұрын
What is we find the particle that cause gravity, wouldn't that mean to know gravity in itself ?.
@whatabouttheearth
@whatabouttheearth 2 ай бұрын
Slave labor makes money. The slaves make a commodity that is sold for money. Slavery is essentially maximized surplus value extraction. A little bit of Marx will help to unfuck peoples brains, but not if you misrepresent him 😂 I can't believe he even entertained Jordan Peterson
@TarekFahmy
@TarekFahmy 2 ай бұрын
excellent video