@GorEldeenOLD lol

stop stealing from us

Github i love you ❤

Same!

Absolutely! As a newbie developer I pulled the ultimate "Fine, I'll do it..." and decided to take on Gadot 4 I'm sick of these crappy unfinished games that the suits keep forcing on us, because even something as simple as a flash game these days have a lot more soul put into them despite not having as much content as the triple A's

So true

++GDScript is very good for prototyping and creating small simple apps, not just games. I rly hope UI-improvement will come also, something like css-integration or web-like scripting.

GDScript is actually really good. Coming from a long career and a lot of other languages, I've basically seen it all, written code in just about everything. At a certain point you just stop caring about a lot of the stupid ideological BS and want a simple, light syntax that's programmer-friendly above all else. One of the biggest things that sold me on the Godot engine was GDScript.That, and the FOSS stuff the talk in the video is about.

@@Morimea you websh*ts are absolutely insane

@@fakecubed ^^^ Yes. The only complaint is performance, but performance is more than good enough for most applications. They've got a callable class, it could also be useful to have a pointer class/datatype.

Oh we got a huge step closer to that all right.

Godot is enjoying you too bro ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Love to see people who saw the writing on the wall earlier than after the fact

Sega already used it that way for the Sonic Colors remaster.

Yes, Blender is really big on this with their Open Movies, and it is a major driver of their development priorities as their artists tell their devs what their problems are and what sort of workflows would be good for them. Nice to have it all in one building.

there are godot paid contributors that works on solo games.

Open source advocates have been warning about every shitty thing companies have done for years or decades, people are starting to notice that we keep getting it right

I'm losing my mind over this

I love that it gives you a ton of control with the different types of objects in the engine... including inheriting from the base Node class. You can actually have a Node with no Transform.

Maybe because the name is GodoT ?

I'm only 34 seconds into the video and I'm not going to watch any more. Hearing him say "go-dot" has turned my world upside down and I'll need some time to recover from this.

It's called "go dot" just like "ro bot" which is why its logo is a robot.

@@greyly_ lol, his main language is spanish is like we read it, that's the sound of those letters in spanish

@@nighttraveler9993 True, and some pronounce it as "g- dot" (supressing the first "o"), so it isn't far from how Juan does it. :)

I think they said they will but it also will take a bit so probably in 4.x > 4.1

Juan said they want to have one editor supporting both.

The long-term plan is to only have one editor executable, with C# support being downloaded as an official add-on when needed. This means you can use the same executable to edit both GDScript and C# projects, with exported projects packing C# support libraries only if it's required.

@@Calinou thats a better option as their motto is to make it extensible having an c# add on be better than fully built in or in different editor

I come from the world of tomorrow, to bring you news, 4.2 should see a single executable with the move of C# to the GDExtension mechanism

Yeah he says Godot is spearheading open source engine. Defold or O3DE can come later.

I think O3DE is in a nice spot because it's an open-source alternative to Unreal. I have no issues with Defold as an engine but I think it's in a tough spot because its target market is the same indie devs that are more likely to go with Godot.

Nonsense, toll roads are so last century. The private road maker of today would sell subscriptions!

Mozilla is actually two parts, the (non-profit) Foundation and the (for-profit) Corporation, with the former owning the latter. The Corporation is the one that makes money, and it makes it from Google being the default search engine. The Corporation is also the one that pays its CEOs 6+ figure salaries, though it also pays full-time developers a competitive salary too. Donations go to the Foundation, and thats actually not directly used to fund Firefox but for internet advocacy work. It's a weird structure and it really doesn't do them any favors. Godot Foundation is directly funded by its users, who can pull funding if they get mad. The Foundation won't make its own Corporation because the major contributors to Godot already have their own, like Ramatak and W4 Games. The idea being that the Godot Foundation builds a neutral core platform that other companies can extend and sell games, consulting services, add-ons, etc.

@@Codotaku Yeah you're right been learning GDExtension and that pretty much all we need to add features.

if so, you would request more features.

@@saul8510 no, not really.. as per my experience godot has everything to make more or less good 3d game , you are not going to make AAA in godot . how ever terrain tool is a must to level up ground to place a house or object, makeing road or hill. godot 3 haas hterrain but it doesnot work with 4. also i dont want to use 3 anymore.

​@@godofdream9112well godot 4 has a new terrain gdextension called terrain 3d, it infinite and has good performance.

You should test godot first with a tiny secondary project.

In the long term, you should definitely be looking to use a FOSS engine of some kind.

Yes

Not so much Godot as Godot. Just don't call it Godot, you'll get blank stares.

It's definitive now. I will shamelessly go back to calling it Godot.

😅😅

The pronunciation is also open source so any way you think works😅

@@lazyprogrammer9290 haha good point

It’s pronounced like the play

That may be Beyond the scope of what Godot is. What you're likely asking for is an ARM Linux distribution that can convince Phone OEMs to adopt it. Samsung is trying to fork Android basically, and disentangle from GooglePlay services, but the weight of content is just too great. Amazon's also tried with FireOS. When was the last time you Rooted your phone/tablet all the way and installed an Android fork that had the Google services stripped out? I recently did to bring a Boomer friend's 7" tablet back into compatibility for the Libbye library app. Which then meant I had to install Google Play Services anyways. Or are you suggesting that Godot try to position itself as the App development APIs for such an ARM Linux OS. Where Google/Android hijacked Java API calls. Allowing Java App programmers to jumpstart Android App development without having to either pay Oracle or learn new APIs from scratch?

Why not support it?

Godot is not unity. We're not creating feature that we won't fix for 5 years :)

what 's broken? you can say what you want, but if you don't explain what and open an issue about it if there's not one already.

What?

lol u mad

@@faer2766 im not, but not sure about juan

Best you learn Godot soon, friend.

Its not just about what godot's made, but what it's capable of, The engine is the first of it's kind, being a competant & convenient game engine made with a completely FOSS mindset. This vid is about how far godot's come and where it can go with good guidance ( see 20:30 ) That is a huge deal.

@@EthanLR well i cant develop games with hopes and dreams. and the engine is not capable of much, from all the info about g4 everything needs to be worked on and fixed. when i make games i want to make games, i dont want to deal with the engine`s problems. and foss means nothing, unity and unreal are open source with the right license, which you can get when you get rich, and i dont think you need the source code to make a good game. you need the source code to optimise and make a more ambitious project. and for such a project youll also need money. people have to realise that open source has a meaning only in the dictionary. thats not a selling point to be braging about. actually with unreal i think you dont even need a license to work with the source code.

He's not talking about desktops, that's a hobbiest niche. Linux runs almost every server on the planet, including KZfaq. It powers all Android phones, Chromebooks, every smart TV, the Kindle, the Steam Deck, most cars, probably your home wifi router, etc etc. Linux is far and wide the default for almost everything.

@@tapo9478 its not fair to compare Linux with a game engine, game engine is a user centric software with UI and interactions, so here it should be compared to Blender, Linux desktops and GIMP type of softwares And tbh paid projects are far superior and used by more people, open source projects never have the polish and finish because they work on a communist model of donation and volunteer work

@@icemelt7ful he's comparing it as an ecosystem, and Linux is the biggest example. I wouldn't say Godot is exactly like Blender, you can use Godot without its editor entirely and just as a runtime. "And tbh paid projects are far superior and used by more people" this is just wrong, Linux is the biggest example out there, and Linux doesn't completely rely on volunteer work either. Google, IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, etc are all massive contributors to Linux. They pay developers to work on it. Godot too has paid developers working on games or platforms. Tesla for example uses Godot to drive the UI of its mobile apps.

@@icemelt7ful You went full r3tard there. All paid project rely on open source to work. I'm going to ignore that communism example you made.