Gewgulkan Suhckitt try saying that a to a fucking artillery shell.

xXx_MLGPRO_xXx It's a Star Wars reference. The thing looks like a Death Star. The first Death Star had a single vulnerable spot two meters wide. It was a thermal exhaust port. Luke Skywalker said something like, "I used to bullseye womp rats in my T-16 back home. They're not much bigger than two meters." That's where I got the womp rat reference from.

***** yeah, I knew it was a reference I just thought that couldn't they have a precise shot from a future sniper or something?

I died laughing

You didnt catch the reference..... You very clearly, did not catch the reference.

Orangy57 i was really bummed but you just made my day

Orangy57 beat me to it

Orangy57 yup

Thank you for pointing this out.

It's a Drake and Josh referance. He isn't just blurting out a random statement, idiots.

Yes

90s called... youre not funny

@@AMG28ful 6 months ahead called... no one asked

this might be a sign that the future-r wheels are empty

i would like to see a maglev ball track mouse

or rather that movie did not bother to consult futurists of what is being developed at the moment! That is how you create today's sci-fi movie ;)

Man....if it weren't for movies and will smith......scientists wouldn't have a clue!!!! Thank god for movies and will smith. :/

@@faterlandas Futurist, what the hell is a futurist.

@@MAJ0RTOM Futurists are people whose specialty or interest is futurology or the attempt to systematically explore predictions and possibilities about the future and how they can emerge from the present, whether that of human society in particular or of life on Earth in general.

@@RedWolf777SG So a bunch of guys trying to predict what is going to occur in the future based in their own speculations and expectations, wonder when that became a profession.

Autonomous hamster balls.

yes climate controlled hamster balls

yeah like 70's, 80's movie, old.

Goodyear, hire this man!

well done you thought of if before me

Pimp your ride with some fog machines. XD

you need more thumbs

NimzoXD im 100 like well thts if you care...

deja vu, i have been to this place before

NimzoXD lol 😂 true

Going on sale next year

Just get a space ship hover cars would suck by comparison

Flying car is overrated

Let's be honest. Flying cars are never coming

@@africkinn5341 Truth

If they somehow make them capable of accelerating with magnetical force,i bet they will manage to make them slow down...by magnetical force.

Yeah...that's what i need when a fucking kid jumps out of nowhere on the street..."magnetic deceleration"

Kevin Batsa same why electric trains stop magnetics

@@thomasbradley7844 You are talking about trains something that moves on rails not asphalt...if its needed the train can use it rails to "instant stop"

Kevin Batsa this is the comment i was looking for

GrezCom no joke probably costs more than a super car like seriously

GrezCom i like your picture

Unlikely, just because its new and a new advancement doesn't mean the cost of making it will change much.

Sensors + mag-lev + increased volume of material = much more expensive.

GrezCom BRO. I SEE YOU EVERYWHERE.

STaSHZILLA nah, no ones dying i found the fountain of youth, just follow these 3 easy steps, doctors hate me!

+I Wear A Fez Now 😂😂😂

Shut up and take my money!

Ok Mr Brooks lol

+Charles Johnson You're a good man. Took a bit for someone to get the reference.

ok boomer

@@mustafaamiri3277 you'll be in old age before you walk down the street to see this

*Yep, this is the misused buzzword thread you're looking for*

@@possibly8180 I wasn't looking for one

@@mustafaamiri3277 how long you think

What do you mean by ”technology we don’t have”?

magnetic levitation is not that hard. usually you'd take an arangement of coils, apply a special pattern of AC to each coil. when you bring copper (or any non-magnetic+conductive material) close to it, the coils will induce a current in the copper. the copper turns the enduced current into a magnetic field wich opposes the ones of the coils. not sure if i really need to clarify that, but its not verry efficient

Haven’t you ever heard of a magnet train?

@@tobbleboii5988 now what technology would allow people to attach these tired to a car via magnetic levitation and control the direction they spin?

More alien tech obtained by negotiating with gray aliens.

yup

Oscy nah it's about 19 years

Yeah it's one of those things that we can actually do, but we never do anything about it, so we just use the shitty outdated version forever.

well there are several problems , the first is how are they attached , second is how do you supply power to these ? so far it is nothing more than a over priced rubber bouncy ball

Tobias James I think somehow the smart people who created this thought about those two issues.

maybe he meant "Circular"

pretty sure he meant cylindrical, as in every modern tire

Grandpa, go back to your room, you are drunk again. circle tires....

Didnt realize my car drove on 2d tires ^^. tmyk

Spherical is what's shown in the video.

I mean, even the crappiest of phones nowadays is more powerful than the rocket that sent the first humans to the moon was so it’s not impossible.

@@rickard1200 I'm sure it's possible. They already have Trains that run on a magnetic system. It just isn't practical or affordable, not to mention it probably wouldn't do well in snowy conditions because of snow and ice clogging up the wheel wells.

We are long way off, but this is definitely the future for Cars. Parking would take seconds!

we have flying cars now.

Flying cars were invented in 1934. Planes just make more sense. You don't want to look up and see a bunch of flying objects in the air as opposed to one big object carrying all those people to where they need to be.

Hold my rubber*

NASA literally reinvented the wheel

The wheel should definitely be reinvented.

@@Krystalmyth it really shouldn't, there's absolutely no reason to not just keep wheels as they are

@@breadsticks1655 there is no need to redo architecture from.modern architecture but because it looks futuristic more than practicality . However spherical wheels still have a few benefits as this video points out .

CP3LobCity for real this video has turned everyone into geniuses

CP3LobCity thank you the rest of these clowns are the idiots that said cellphones would never be a. thing and look at us now. the benifit of being intelligent is being able to evolve.

It doesn't take a masters in physics to understand that this concept just isn't possible. Goodyear are a tyre company, they make rubber circles. I doubt they know anything about the tech involved in non-contact transfer of mechanical force like they're showing here.

+IIDREAMBOXII yeah I'm sure they haven't thought about it >_>

IIDREAMBOXII Goodyear is a preetty big company with a big research part (Im sure they have 1). Guess which ppl work in the research part? yeah physics ppl

Do you think this is a joke? It's very tiring to wrap my head around all these puns. Freaking circle jerk.

We don't appreciate that talk round here. You're treading on thin ice.

I sphere i read a joke about this somewhere around here

Looks like my balls....

Wished I’d a said that very funny!

@Olias you made my day 😂

@Olias or from a highly advanced civilization.

I think that's where they got the idea lmao

Guess that predicted this.

OShit.

theodoros tsilikis I'm hoping for triangle, but that will be painful for your butt.

theodoros tsilikis you see everyone's looking in the wrong direction the answer isn't sphere, square or triangle the only logical choice for shape is trapezoid

wouldn't cubes make for a very bumpy ride?

son that's too much minecraft for you

theodoros tsilikis How? You'd have to make the roads bumpy so that the wheels could correlate to a 360° smooth rotation.

Best comment i found here :)

Michael Robinson 😀 noup! They invented something that car which levitate doesn't need.

Michael Robinson thats not a wheel

umm yeah, someone needs to update the definition of that idiom soon...lol

Michael Robinson No, it's a tire.

Good point

Good idea

Led screens on the outside of the car, then Download .mp4 (or whatever) files with rims on the internet and show the it on the screens :-D

TheFilledk still dont like it, what about the drift D:

the car well be able to drive sideways

Unnown user, if the rear tyres are configured to behave like ordinary rear wheels, then this car can drift just as well as any other car :) Just because the tires are round doesn't mean they have infinite grip, or necessarily have to roll sideways if you don't want them to

less surface area of the tire would be touching the ground for a round tide then regular, so there would be far less traction for sure.

This wouldn't need any more energy than normal tires so i don't know what you're on about

@@nadarith1044 Sustained maglev suspension is far beyond the limits of a modern internal comustion engine.

@@PaxTorumin ?!!?!?!???!?!?! _"Electromagnetic suspension (EMS) is the magnetic levitation of an object achieved by constantly altering the strength of a magnetic field produced by electromagnets using a feedback loop. In most cases the levitation effect is mostly due to _*_permanent magnets as they don't have any power dissipation, with electromagnets only used to stabilize the effect. .._* _...Magnetic levitation technology is important because it _*_reduces energy consumption, largely reduces friction. It also avoids wear and has very low maintenance requirements._*_ The application of magnetic levitation is most commonly known for its role in Maglev trains."_ you do realize that active magnetic suspension is for example used in things like magnetic bearings, which not only use very little power but have a variant that is entirely passive and uses permanent magnets? magnetic suspension is actually more energy efficient than anything mechanical by far due to massively decreasing energy loses caused by friction the idea that they need massive power is simply wrong, they would need *less* power than normal wheels

@@nadarith1044 Hm. After a bit of research it turns out rare earth magnets are neither rare, nor terribly expensive. Not even neodymium. I had assumed the maglev portion of the vehicle would be "active," using magnetic coils that require continuous power flow, rather than a passive effect provided by natural magnets. This would probably be a very efficient design after all. I guess the real reason we don't have tires like this is probably related to R&D costs or mass production issues.

@@PaxTorumin A big reason of why technologies like these (that aren't fundamentally orders of magnitude inferior in performance and actually can be a viable alternative if developed enough) aren't widely used or developed can be chalked to the general aversion to radically different technologies in industry in general, not just development and production cost that's unfavorable when compared to more mature technologies with decades of streamlining but also the way people don't like new and different things alongside the dunning-kruger effect one only has to look at ridiculous 'design flaws' people with no knowlegde of engineering or very basic knowlegde of mechanical principles at work invent on videos of various garage prototypes people made of spherical 'wheels' or really any demonstration of unfamiliar technology including even the maglev trains which tend to receive that treatment from many in the west to realize that people have a tendency to overinflate and outright invent flaws and inefficiencies for anything new (at the same time obvious scam stuff like compressed air driven engines somehow receive the 'goverment blocked this technology' and 'it's a miracle tech just needs some more work!' treatment from many so go figure) i can easily imagine a situation where the first person to start working on creating the 'motorized horseless carriage' decided to eschew the wooden wheels of carriages at the time in favor of roller driven roughly patterned balls citing the cramped nature of cities and countryside or something similar, and continued development on that instead in sheer bloody mindedness until it was made to work good enough with solutions like coating contact surfaces and the balls with rubber that deforms to some degree for a greater contact patch or having a basic suspension where free-rolling rollers on springs hold the ball tightly regardless of how uneven the surface of it is, then the resulting prototype automobiles would be used as a starting point for everyone else a century later and any garage prototype that used actual wheels would be ridiculed with having overblown 'flaws' and 'low efficiency' like 'but all the force of the motor would need to go through a single shaft it would break easily!' and 'it needs an entirely different drive train setup just imagine the complexity and cost!' as long as competing technologies aren't massively unequal in efficiency luck and what was developed first are actually greater factors than simple efficiency or cost-benefit analysis, and when one technology is much more mature than another the new one will have incredible difficulty getting to the market, needing decades of development to become on par, this holds true even in cases where said tech would actually be objectively better and more efficient

@Doug Shaw both

Ikr?

Yes , like a cpu in every cm of my vehicle.

@@phillm156 cpu in toilet paper rolls.

@@rudyferrell not too much silicon, could be painful 😥

@@phillm156 too many boobys that need inflating

6. Probes are landed on Mars and survive the impact. 7. The car sits on the tyres. 9. Different companies can make compatible products for mutual profit. 10. I don't know that the tyres _do_ talk to each other. 11. You get in and out _before_ completing the parking procedure. 12. How can we fly in planes? 13. There's such a thing as a computer. Expensive cars already have four-wheel steering, dependent on the speed, that is completely transparent to the driver.

Great questions. I personally know I wouldn't depend on something 100% automated that I have no control over. The one you asked about loss of power is something that already crossed my mind. Since it works on energy, what happens to the car when the tyres drain of energy.

Pilots are still required to fly manually when they can to keep trained for an eventuality such as this which actually happened: a plane crashed into the water at 150mph instantaneously killing all occupants after a sensor froze and since the pilot had mostly flown under auto pilot he made much more mistakes than he would have done if he was flying manually the whole time. No safety critical system should rely on automation for it to be functional thats just dangerous. Automation should only be applied in a way that assists the human in control but keeps the human in control at all times so when something does go wrong they can act accordingly.

megaspeed2v2 "Automation should only be applied in a way that assists the human in control but keeps the human in control at all times so when something does go wrong they can act accordingly." I love that.

That's entirely dependent on how good your automation is. Both humans and electromechanical devices have an error rate. If the error rate of an electromechanical device is significantly lower than the error rate of a human operator, the electromechanical device should take precedent. Activities like piloting vehicles are outside of a humans evolutionary "design parameters" (remember, we evolved to hunt, forage, and survive predators, not pilot tons of metal at hundreds of mph), the fact that we can do it at all is a testament to biological adaptability, but it is still eminently feasible to design a purpose-built system which is superior to a human for that specific task. As a counterpoint to the example you give, it should be noted that the most common cause of aviation disasters by far is human error, and several disasters have been caused by pilots overriding, or air traffic controllers ignoring warnings from, automated systems.

This kind of smooth brain ideology would’ve prevented cars from ever being made in the first place. I’m surprised you’re not griping about how we should all be riding horses.

@@FirstFamilyCharger we should be.

@@fsherman898 fair enough lad

@@FirstFamilyCharger However, I don’t agree with your statement. When automobiles were first pondered upon, there was no alternative for comparison. While this idea, is to replace a wheel and tire assembly which on average weighs about 60 pounds.

to be fair these have tonnes extra grip and would be equipped in a car with supremem abs and road sensing, so it'd brake to a stop a mile away. though I agree; this is a stupid idea.

Hidden Clone b-b-but you won't be able to um... to turn sideways without turning... so pay over that 200k per tire come on you don't have a choice now.

Vestbi again have you heard of up scale, I'm not defending this type of tire but I feel this must be addressed. All things are expensive at first but then something called upscale takes place in which companies find the most effective way of mass producing said product while offering a decent performance(relative) for the customer. This upscale does not happen over night either it takes years to to work down into a plan but once it's there you would be paying for these new tires just like the current tires we have today of course there is always inflation or deflation of currency ( I can't remember the word for the inverse of inflation) which would change prices in the future but alas every thing comes down to relative cheapness once supply and demand re establish.

Im good with communicating with telegraph lines, they work just as well as text messages

Hidden Clone You're the nut that is against technological advances

Alan Anzo not really I'd rather I nice looking car than a retarded car that looks like a delorian and a Volvo had sex but the child dressed like the 80's at the same time as dressing futuristic

I loved Will Smith's's's's I Robot

James Cree looks like will smith WILL soon fight those robos for real

Had to scroll way down for this

Just thinking the same damn thing XD

Was going to comment that till I seen this

*1980's:* We will have flying cars in the future *The Future:* _best i can do is big rubber balls..._

dumbest sht i ever read.

not for a woman it is

Ugh it would be a breeze with this tech lol

Parallel parking refers to parking at the side of the road, often with one car in front and one car behind the slot you want to get your car into. Doors are usually pavement-side and road-side, so you wouldn't have difficulty getting out of the car. In the situation you're talking about (which is not parallel parking), presumably you get out and tell the car to park itself. Either way you're not stuck in the car.

May be your grand-son will be able to use this technology

B. Wooton same

Funny! But - how is this even possible??? Blows my mind...

Underrated comment.

Lol... literally!!

Brian Flaherty good one

Brian Flaherty I liked and unliked your comment 20 times due to the awesomeness of the use of that quote lol

Brian Flaherty hahahaha those were the good Ole days

HAHA!!

Electronic recharging battery + Electro-magnetism + specialised operating system + weight distribution = a car that only needs space for a battery, computer hardware, charger port and seats. Not to mention without the option for user controlled actions, you would save a shit ton of space saved in the car already We get it, You understand how an axel based car works. This car doesn't have axels. Nor would have a need for a petrol based engine. And seeing as it doesn't have axels, would consume less energy from the basic actions that syphon momentum (and therefore energy) from the current output. Well done on picking up a concept wrong.

Isaac Wolffe rekt

Lol this guy has no idea about electric vehicle torque

Zoe Ama and you have no idea about magnetical levitation

Based Caesar Into the trash you say? *Deja vu, I've just been in this place before*

kchen075 Higher on the street?

nope, the beat.

>omnidirectional wheels >get custom hack mods >override autodriver >boost magnetic suspension >running through the future with a hearty chub

It has a GPS, stops in front of obstacles, an automatic horn, and the fuel is really cheap!

link5205 just put some of the round tires on your buggy

Ooh everyone look at mister fancy pants over here with his horse and cart. I drive that car from the Flintstones. Get on my level pleb. ;) jk

David Purcell I tiptoe and crawl to my destination so there! :)

link5205 pikey

Potatowalnut I know where this is from hilarious XD

LOL! Gaming Sphere from Drake and Josh.

CaptainSoviet1 I'm so glad people actually get the reference 😄

LOL!

Triggered

Micah Beard SAMMMEEE

Micah Beard I wasn't the only one?!?! LMFAO

Micah Beard Same

Micah Beard Wouldn't it be a little expensive for an april fool?

haha yup

yeah right. As if a wheel can rotate in all directions.

flying cars would make traffic a nightmare, right now if your car breaks down you can simply pull over and pop in a new one, if flying cars were implemented and your car breaks down, you will be plummeting from the sky wreaking havoc to anyone under you.

mike hunt- Fuck that insurance would be through the ------ roof. 😤

They launch flying taxis in Dubai this year. (which are drones, so theyre rather helicopters than cars. but yeah, "flying taxis")

Flying cars are more real than this. Drones are prototypes of future flying cars. Just a light version of helicopter. Tons of new problems.

Well, what is a flying car? Because depending on the definition you give it, a helicopter or an airplane might be one.

For a company that is all about tires, this is a perfect idea.

How about theres no tires instead? HOVERCARS!!!

hover on what? free energy? wishfull dreams? dank memes?? magic fairy dust??? sorry you hover-cars are in another reality.

Nekogami-Crystal we already have hover cars dumb ass. they just aren't useful so we choose to not fund that market. hell with some know how and scrap you could convert any car into a hover car. you just won't be able to turn well.

Nekogami-Crystal theyre already inn development, actually. you must be so close minded to think like that. even a lil child can think a magnet force can make somethin hover . not your fairy dust shit

Iohane A oooohhh wee

I believe in the future of technology.

The wheel is the most reinvented thing on earth.

Truth Space how? The only thing that’s changed is the material there made of

Jesse Ridgeway A modification is re-inventing. Inventions are not necessarily a completely original idea. Most inventions are just modified versions of something that already exists. That's why products are an evolution. A wheel is simply a round object designed to rotate around a central axis. There are millions of objects that fit a wheel description.

Seems like more

You may wanna ponder on that a little more. Imagine if you took a normal tire and just made it wider. Would you have more or less points of contact? If it's inflated like a basketball then if course it would have less points of contact, but it won't be completely full it'll lack a bit so it doesn't have to be restricted to having less traction

It seems like it would have less contact area to me. Besides aren’t the side walls giving part of steering control. And the fun. What? No more drifting. This is taking the fun out of driving for safety’s sake. If they can’t drive give them the bumper clown car 🤪

@@ChodyRay yeah, I've pondered it. Ignore deformation, for a moment, and imagine the contact area of a normal tire against a road (cylinder against a plane); the contact area is a line as long as the width of the tire (length of a cylinder). Now imagine the contact areaof a SPHERE on a plane: IT'S A SINGLE POINT, which is much less than a line. Now factor in the deformation of an elastic material. Let the traditional tire, say 10 inches wide, deform under a given force, such that the line of contact thickens from a 10 inch line with zero thickness to a 10 inch rectangle with 3 inches of width. 30 sq inches of contact under deformation. To get 30 inches of deformation on an elastic sphere, would take a sphere of much larger radius than the regular tire, or a much lower psi (would have to deform much more under the same given force), which would also introduce a lot more rolling resistance and drag. To summarize, to get the same contact area on a deformed elastic sphere as on a deformed elastic cylinder, the sphere would have to much more easily deform (with less force) or have to be much bigger. Neither are desirable. The tire is better.

@@Gruuvin1 yeah but you're thinking of a solid metal sphere that is filled with air and has no room for movement for the sphere to compress and decompress with the road if it's deflated a bit, then that much more rubber is touching. Not to mention the tires are going to be a bit bigger to compensate as well. I agree that in this point in time tires are better but once we're able to actually perfect it I could see it being alot better

😅😅😅😅🤣🤣🤣🤣vee !

if so? how much will it cost?

something like 5m maybe... completely affordable!

oooooooh better get my down payment ready

StorminNorth keep your current car and maintain it

daniel godin rly? you guys believe that this thing will be on the market in 20 years?

Fewer moving parts can also mean less problems. Maybe it will even out.

Afaik, sensor technology is known to be very sensitive to all sorts of influences and break under those influences. Cars experience a very wide range of influences that can cause sensor malfunctions. I mean anybody with simple fucking parking sensors i know of has relied on it and had a bump-in due to malfunction. We're a long way from being able to make robust sensors. On top of that, the power transfer to the spheres, what will make em rotate? I'd guess that such a system either requires high amounts of current which batteries can't provide for a long enough time or it would be very delicate and not powerfull enough to propell a car. I don't mind the dreaming, i do mind that it's presented as something that is already practical.

AwoudeX This is a concept, and the whole reasons behind concepts is to analyse the flaws and challenges and adapt it to future technologies. Flying cars for example, they don't exist and will probably not get invented, but the whole venture has allowed us to study levitation more in depth...

like biggie said mo senors mo problems

Matthew Hemmings Well some guy did develop one. But large scale manufacturing got shot down

zatox But...but what about dubs and those spinny things.

And where do you put the air in?

nidhin vinod You're dumb as fuck.

We don't really know that tbh.

what if the aliens are still in the past and play with stones and rocks and suck each others dicks?

SS RAMBO Sounds like 3 quarters of the Earth to me

Julian KMS

That car was hovering. But I get what you're saying. That could be what inspired this concept.

Or a maglev.

LeoDavid Fernandez yea but they didn't actually do it did they dumb fuck? its a movie jesus

It takes a special kind of person to become upset over a comment on a video, stoop to name calling over the internet, behind the safe confines of their keyboard... Congrats, you get a gold star special person!

yeah i memba

Morlanius As for the power, I can only assume that they are implementing a superior form of wireless power exchange between the car and tire. About accommodating the weight of the vehicle while in its "joint" or whatever you'd call it, it uses magnetic forces that would push equally with the cars weight.

Morlanius You mean power will be transmitted to the weels through waves such as how phones could be able to transmit to others without cables. C'mon man this is 6th grade science stuff, I should know Im in 6th grade!!

Morlanius Im sure they are working with other companies or working on building their own new advanced cars that will hold such thing as the new wheel

Mike Awesomeness talking about transferring movement though....much different than transmitting signal.

That would be one hell of an EMF required to rapidly throw the direction of these tires with that much weight on them.

lol

lolo 😂😂

you seriously cant see the tires?

If you look closer you'll notice that it is using Michelin tires.

Joel Morales Michelin tires is all I use best tires out there

also Minority Report.... good catch.

DAVIZ OPZ That's what I thought. I Robot

YOU ARE EXPERIENCING A CAR ACCIDENT

***** good movies

looks like cars from Recall movie ..they newer one

Probably none, while magnetism attracts, it also repels. In this case, everything magnetic is being repelled from the wheel well.

Don't know about that. Try repelling a nail. Iron doesn't repel.

What do you mean Iron doesn't repel?

not true

If you have a magnet in the car making it positive. Then the outside of the ball also being positive, it'll repel. That's nothing new and shouldn't surprise anyone. What I'm most interested in is how braking is going to work with these. How strong does the magnet have to be to stop the vehicle and how much can it be before it lifts the car too high. Don't even worry about these. They're just an idea, nothing like this is actually functional.

@John yes I am well aware its a single word, but it is a double entendra also.

EMP guns will literally stop the getaway car instantly.

mewletter yeah, and everyone else on the road, including yourself

You wouldn't get stopped by the police. The car will automatically drive you to your location. The wheels will follow the speed limit and everything.

really hope this never comes to fruition then

Ha Hi Yeah, but then you tell your bud that you've got information that could put Hillary in prison, and suddenly, your automatic car mysteriously 'reroutes' off a cliff... Harambe will have died for nothing.

Elon Musk is probably already on it.

@Brian Grimes a rubber laminated giant metal ballbearing.

josh hall they didnt. they evolved it from pokewheel to pokeball

shane koszczewski you should try catching Pokémon with it

Ayyyyyyyy. Good one

josh hall - Perfect comment.

It's called progress.

JOHN DOE ayyyyy lmao

JOHN DOE budum cchhh

I'm TIRED of these puns.

Karl Inglott , not me! Keep them ROLLING in!

I'm done

rotisserie919 that's what happens when someone steals your idea.

dude if u aren't happy paying like 300-400 dollars for a tire buy the cheap ones they go for like 100 dollars each but they last a shit

Hernan Pastenes with this new tire design. There will be no need to buy tires again. Because vehicles will be held to the road via magnetism.

Saint matthias I don't care about buying tires my comment was to the dude who Is crying about the price of them

Saint, The magnetism holds the wheels to the car. The wheels still touch the road.

Johnny Martinez ye finally someone noticed xD

Johnny Martinez yep hahahaha

and spectral to I guess lol 2:48

I guess Apple engineers were watching "Star Trek"

The audi concept was before "I robot"

Ah, a globe tard...

fishy fingers earth is flat

WYATT_SCHMALZ 78 Nah, Earth is obviously in the shape of a velociraptor, look at the facts dumbass

Elierbster you've all got it wrong earth is a fart

Serg.i0 _ damn.

lol

+balabay77 Oh Shit, there goes the planet.

+balabay77 Unlike me - I'm just tired. :-D

+balabay77 BRILLIANT!

nice wordplay.lol.goedendag

That's a thing, but just not in the US.

Don't know about where you live but here in New Jersey, there's a timer on the green light for pedestrians. Once the countdown reaches zero, the don't walk sign shows up and the light turns green for the other road a couple seconds later. Not exactly a red light timer, but close enough.

Tevatron044 Where I live all traffic lights have countdowns

Marc D yeah but not like this. I have them too here in Florida on the walkways, but i like the way they had it here

Here in DC we have timers

Magnetar The True Death Star FUCK I won't

zylx gaming it's ok man it's ok change is good.

Magnetar The True Death Star good bye, tire swings, HELLO, WRECKING BALL SWINGS

CloudTheKid RS you could play a whole new game. Knock over the middle schoolers.

+Magnetar The True Death Star At least we don't have to see those ugly, riced rims.

Clorox Bleach why do I see you in the comments on like every video I see 😐

GalacticSlayer why do you say that?

because the "centrifugal force" isn't actually a force

Mikkel Østberg it is. its similar to centripetal force, the difference is the reference frame, in this case inertial. I suppose they used centrifugal force to make it more understandable to the public

fictitious force that we "sense" when we are in a inertial reference frame, the force is caused by a centripetal force due to change in the direction of V and experienced by unatached objects in the frame

or something like that. its not a real force because nothing causes it, just an object trying to move straight ( first newton law) while the frame is in a circular motion