2027 US Carrier Group vs 2027 Chinese Carrier Group (Naval Battle 131) | DCS

  Рет қаралды 168,926

Grim Reapers

Grim Reapers

Күн бұрын

Welcome to the first in our latest series of Naval Carrier Battle. We start with 2027 US Carrier Group vs China Carrier Group.
The US use AIM-260 missiles from their stealth F-35 fighters and MAKO hypersonic and Tomahawk subsonic anti-ship missiles. The Chinese use their YJ-21 ballistic hypersonic and YJ-12 and YJ-18 supersonic anti-ship missiles
My apologies for my terrible voice in this video, I had hoped to regain my health before starting these new naval battles, but it just wasn't to be :(
Mods: • Free DCS Mods (download links in the relevant video)
Mods: www.currenthill.com/
PATREON: / grimreapers
0:00 Intro
0:36 Overview
2:40 Details
5:37 Predictions
6:59 Battle
USEFUL LINKS
GRIM REAPERS (KZfaq): / @grimreapers
GRIM REAPERS 2 (KZfaq): / @grimreapers2
GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
DCS BUYERS GUIDES: • DCS World Module Quick...
DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
SOCIAL MEDIA
WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
TWITTER: / grimreapers_
DISCORD: / discord
THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
#GRNavalBattle #DCSNavalBattle #F35 #J35 #MAKO #HypersonicMissile #5thGen #Stealth #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military #DCS

Пікірлер: 497
@superflyguy4488
@superflyguy4488 Ай бұрын
Cmon, who doesn't like a 'what if' naval battle on a Friiiiiiidaaaaaaaaaaaaaay?
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
ooo ooo me me me!
@timblack6422
@timblack6422 Ай бұрын
I do, I dooooo!
@sebfettel
@sebfettel Ай бұрын
Sounds like fun to me. Cheers!
@Dimitris_Datseris
@Dimitris_Datseris Ай бұрын
@@grimreapers shouldn’t the F-18s with the MAKO’s attack the remaining destroyers ?
@Doodelz02
@Doodelz02 Ай бұрын
You lost ANOTHER carrier? /facepalm
@streetcop157
@streetcop157 Ай бұрын
I think there was a reversal on the tyco retirement decision. Apparently someone in congress noticed we were spending millions to upgrade them while planning to retire them…it was awkward. Right up there with retiring littoral combat ships while building littoral combat ships.
@cmkeelDIM
@cmkeelDIM Ай бұрын
I think you mean Tico, not tyco.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Roger thanks.
@dspicerj
@dspicerj Ай бұрын
It’s called corruption mate it’s how the American oligarchy works.
@MairinGoBragh
@MairinGoBragh Ай бұрын
yeah, my dad worked for the Fincantieri shipyard in Marinette, WI / Menominee, MI (Marinette Marine) until he retired a few years ago. He was the chief weight estimator on the R/V Sikuliak for the University of Alaska before moving to structures on the Lockheed single-hull LCS. They're now working on the follow-on FFG (Frigate, Guided Missile) that won FFG(X), which will become the Constellation-class frigate. BTW Cap ( @GrimReapers ), that's important info if you want to do a 2029 battle, as the US Navy expects the Constellation to be delivered in 2026 and come into commission in 2029, with deliveries and commissions coming in as fast as they lay keels. They laid the keel down for FFG-62, USS Constellation, on 12 April. After that will come 63 (USS Congress), 64 (USS Chesapeake), 65 (USS Lafayette), 66 (USS Hamilton), and the as-yet-unnamed FFG-67. All of these plus the next 6 are slated to be stationed at Naval Station Everett on the Puget Sound northwest of Seattle, Washington, on the Pacific Rim. A little bit of history for you: among the first six frigates in the US Navy inventory, starting in 1797 were the USS Constellation (#2), the USS Chesapeake (#4), and the USS Congress (#5). The others were the United States (#1), the Constitution (#3), and the President (#6). Constellation was the ship who fought against and captured the French frigate Insurgente in 1799, marking the first major naval victory of the US Navy. In 1800, she fought against the French frigate Vengeance in 1800, and while Vengance was not captured or sunk, she was so badly damaged that her captain intentionally ran her aground to keep from sinking. The original Constellation was scrapped, but her replacement of the same name (keel laid in 1854) is in museum in Baltimore, Maryland.
@sirwholland7
@sirwholland7 Ай бұрын
True, and the new Constellation Class DDGs are hitting cost overruns and the deployment date is being pushed to the left by years.
@sandevee439
@sandevee439 Ай бұрын
That SM-6 snipe on the AWACS was simply beautiful
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
I measured it, it was a 190 miles shot, no idea how, we set it as max 150 miles missile.
@kazefw3834
@kazefw3834 Ай бұрын
​@@grimreapers "NANO MACHINE SON!!!" moment 😂
@ArpanDe
@ArpanDe Ай бұрын
​@@grimreapers aren't sm3 used for stuff like that??
@OxBlitzkriegxO
@OxBlitzkriegxO 4 күн бұрын
Tail wind 👍
@XrandomnessX
@XrandomnessX Ай бұрын
I've been recovering from a serious car accident that happened and 2021 and the first year of that was spent bed bound. Finding this channel was a welcome distraction during the darkest times of my life and even though I get around much better I absolutely get so excited for these naval battles. Amazing how game/sim tech has come. With that being said, Cap. Would it be possible to do a US/China vs. The world naval battle with this tech?
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Glad to help! Will try.
@ravenkk4816
@ravenkk4816 Ай бұрын
@@grimreaperssay how is making up data so that is definitely will win is going for your channel? The view ship is getting a bit low😂
@dpddpd71
@dpddpd71 Ай бұрын
@@ravenkk4816 GR sim data is based on Wikipedia specs, which is itself based on publicly released specs from respective governments. Accurate? Of course not. Real world does not equal public media releases. You might feel better after I inform you it's just a video game, and these videos are for entertainment. Results may vary for hypersensitive ideologues however.
@ravenkk4816
@ravenkk4816 Ай бұрын
@@dpddpd71 yea right, it not based on wiki. I have personal see him reduce the system status when he starts to lose. If this is not hyper sensitive ideologues than I don’t know what is. He can’t even take a single lose.
@user-wl7lh9xu6q
@user-wl7lh9xu6q Ай бұрын
My very best wishes to your health
@Striker427
@Striker427 Ай бұрын
Can't wait to see this on my graduation day in 2027
@753238
@753238 Ай бұрын
i hope you are referring to WW3
@Striker427
@Striker427 Ай бұрын
@@753238 yup
@tony38727
@tony38727 Ай бұрын
We'll be okay.
@thetbnrtitanium007
@thetbnrtitanium007 Ай бұрын
16:43 That wasn't lag, that was the AIM-260 switching lock to a PL-15 and shooting it down. Crazy stuff
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Aim-260 apparently best 260.
@mikedellinger872
@mikedellinger872 Ай бұрын
Seems like DCS doesn't have the F-35's tactics down yet. But this was a fun sim!
@riphopfer5816
@riphopfer5816 Ай бұрын
Hello, Cap; I’m sorry to hear about your health. Praying for your recovery, mate. This was a white-knuckle battle. .Good show, mein bruder!
@willwozniak2826
@willwozniak2826 Ай бұрын
Great mission guys...nice to see the SM 3 BLOCK IIA in action...those have a top speed of Mach 16 to 18...so they say..
@JohnDoe-gn3rg
@JohnDoe-gn3rg Ай бұрын
13.2 dont know were you heard 18. That would melt the missile and would require very expensive and heavy heat shielding.
@SwervingRain
@SwervingRain Ай бұрын
ive never played any of these games and have no interest in flight sim whatsoever, but these videos never fail to entertain and interest me. thank you for these
@exidy-yt
@exidy-yt Ай бұрын
Best naval battle in AGES, Cap! Thank you for this, super entertaining breakfast watch!
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
thx
@penguinking1423
@penguinking1423 Ай бұрын
Would the US use the Mako and the Lrasm. For example would one wing of 18 f-18s use the mako and the other the lrasm. Or is the lrasm meant to be used via bomber?
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Yup, just wanted to try the different/new weapons TBH.
@John333Scout
@John333Scout Ай бұрын
@@grimreapers Can we try that next? Also what about the more airframes US carriers can carry. Wouldnt it be assumed that they can launch and destroy the rest of the destroyers now that the Chinese offensive ability has been neutralized and it would just be a matter of time to launch more aircraft or even land and refit the aircraft out there to destroy the remaining destroyers.
@Jeffrey.1978
@Jeffrey.1978 Ай бұрын
@@grimreapers I apologize, I asked for a similar thing in my comment post.
@jameslarson319
@jameslarson319 Ай бұрын
The ships would use LRASM over likely the tomahawk. The f18's would still carry the MAKOs if not even F35s. They would likely carry 6 Makos over 4. So one wing would have the ability to output 108 missiles. Which is absolutely insane.
@sweatybotfn9982
@sweatybotfn9982 Ай бұрын
Amaaazing battles as always. Hope you get better soon!
@ThaKrazed
@ThaKrazed Ай бұрын
Recently discovered your channel while on a late-night expedition down the KZfaq rabbit hole. Love the content you bring, very entertaining!
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Welcome!
@carlosgarcia9497
@carlosgarcia9497 Ай бұрын
Sane bro.
@tbe0116
@tbe0116 Ай бұрын
The navy will have dual pack pac-3’s on ships later this year.
@totalNERD-eo7wx
@totalNERD-eo7wx Ай бұрын
I think those are going to be deployed on AEGIS Ashore first
@DirectorBird
@DirectorBird Ай бұрын
Thought it was quad pack?
@tbe0116
@tbe0116 Ай бұрын
@@DirectorBird Looks like dual pack for the MSE variant.
@user-gv4zb9rc6u
@user-gv4zb9rc6u Ай бұрын
​@@tbe0116I had heard it wad a quad pack of the MSE they fired off AGIES radars from the Mk.41 vls cell
@duanemckinley9353
@duanemckinley9353 Ай бұрын
They can be dual or quad packed depending on what the Navy wants.
@subgaming1207
@subgaming1207 Ай бұрын
I love these kinds of naval battles👍
@metfoil4815
@metfoil4815 Ай бұрын
Love the vids keep it up!
@panzerabwerkanone
@panzerabwerkanone Ай бұрын
Two Chinese pilots defected and landed in Norway.
@davidn3394
@davidn3394 Ай бұрын
This was by far my favorite sim yet thanks team.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Yeh I like this one also.
@luciofreitasjunior
@luciofreitasjunior Ай бұрын
Great videos!
@SmilingCamperVan-dd8cb
@SmilingCamperVan-dd8cb Ай бұрын
I absolutely love naval battles!
@342Rodry
@342Rodry Ай бұрын
good, this is one is going in my top 3 of best naval battles of this channel.
@romain5967
@romain5967 Ай бұрын
So glad gou guys are still doing these with all the new tech, a real public service for geeks worldwide
@nathaniellazo5912
@nathaniellazo5912 Ай бұрын
Oh my!! Let's go, been a minute since the last carrier match-up. This one will be fun. Also wondering, just because it is on paper, could you do the future russian Shtrom Carrier against another group, or 2v2, hell, even a 3v3, if possible match-ups? Either way, keep doing what you're doing, hope you are feeling better man.
@edutaimentcartoys
@edutaimentcartoys Ай бұрын
awesome naval carrier battle video
@WilliamSudek
@WilliamSudek Ай бұрын
Even with your health issues, your voice is like a symphony.
@sixft7in
@sixft7in Ай бұрын
35:06 Looks like the TR (CVN-71) met their reenlistment target as evidenced by their port anchor being painted gold.
@GeraldWalls
@GeraldWalls Ай бұрын
I really enjoy your videos. Keep them up. These videos are probably as informative on weapon capabilities as official documents are and are in a much easier to digest format.
@AmirShafeek
@AmirShafeek Ай бұрын
Cap has said himself that this is just a game and shouldn't be taken seriously
@GeraldWalls
@GeraldWalls Ай бұрын
@@AmirShafeek In my mind "informative" means that it gives you a good idea but is not authoritative. I listen to their discussions about modeling inaccuracies and likely IRL tactics that they can force in the game. I guess the comparison to "official documents" was misleading because what I meant was that a layperson can watch these videos and end up with as good of an idea of what these systems can do as they would get from reading publicly-published documents. Will there be inaccuracies? Yeah, but they're not something that's going to impact me.
@AmirShafeek
@AmirShafeek Ай бұрын
@@GeraldWalls I was under the impression that you were saying that these videos could be taken hand-in-hand with real life thank you for explaining your point. Lot of people in the comments seem to think that if America can win a new video games they can win in real life
@SabbaticusRex
@SabbaticusRex Ай бұрын
@@AmirShafeek Sort of like claiming to know the exact characteristics of a new car by simply seeing the body shape and reading the advertisement stats from the window sticker . Not exactly accurate at all hehe
@AmirShafeek
@AmirShafeek Ай бұрын
@@SabbaticusRex wait a minute u mean to tell me a mustang gt is slower than a hellcat but it looks super aErODyNaMIC. Lol
@matthirsch4952
@matthirsch4952 Ай бұрын
Cap, these are my favorite. Take care.
@Qtip855
@Qtip855 Ай бұрын
Great video😊you guys are hysterical 🤣
@johnhodgson4216
@johnhodgson4216 Ай бұрын
The main Warhead of a hypersonic missile is the Kinetic energy of the missile itself, it looks like DCS added kinetic energy of the Mako.
@SabbaticusRex
@SabbaticusRex Ай бұрын
Ritalin is what turns Cap into ' Super Cap ' , I am convinced now .
@TassyBudgies
@TassyBudgies Ай бұрын
After spending just over 20years in the Navy it’s interesting to watch how the engagements turn out,keep up the great work and hope you’re feeling better…..👍
@M4m1de
@M4m1de Ай бұрын
Wake up, Carrier battles are back
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Oooo yeh!
@Tomdog83
@Tomdog83 Ай бұрын
Won't know when it comes out either. Reds usually overestimate capabilities, Blues usually hide capabilities.
@AmirShafeek
@AmirShafeek Ай бұрын
Proof of this
@DCresident123
@DCresident123 23 күн бұрын
oh the irony
@user-ft2zc5or9d
@user-ft2zc5or9d 17 күн бұрын
​@@AmirShafeekthe war in Ukraine. Russia said their hypersonic missiles were invincible and everyone said Patriot was shit........ yeah things change huh
@AmirShafeek
@AmirShafeek 17 күн бұрын
@@user-ft2zc5or9d yea stupid comments on both side, a missile can't be invincible and the Russians where dumb for alluding that their hypersonic missle couldn't be shot down anything can be shot down given the right parameters. And I don't think that people thought that Patriot was shit moreso when compared to its Russian counterpart s-400 it didn't really stack up. Which is fair because during the Gulf war the Patriot performed horribly going as far to shoot down friendly aircraft due to software problems and that guy died. That's not a good Reputation for a defense system to have at least when the Russians do it they can say it was due to incompetence or blame ukraine. And from what I can tell no civilian in America really knows how well Patriot or Russias hypersonic missle performed because of a lack of unbiased opinion Russians say one thing to please it's population but America says another to please it's population unless you can bring up military documents or footage of some kind showing how well Patriot performed I'd be hard-pressed to believe any numbers not just from you but any news source like cnn or fox.
@Dberryc17
@Dberryc17 Ай бұрын
Cap, love the channel. If you’re looking for more content maybe look into reading some of the tipping point books? It’s very Chinese /USA centric scenario with multiple set ups that could possibly happen in real life. Thought of you guys as I was reading the books. Some examples: two Arleigh Burke’s doing a fonop near the South China Sea and getting accidentally fired upon by shore based missile’s, type 55 Chinese destroyers trying to protect a fleet of transports from air strikes (land based aircraft and shore based missile launches ) while they cross the channel. Keep up the good work!
@markpukey8
@markpukey8 Ай бұрын
I love these GR video's., but the real world version of this battle would be TWO US carrier groups versus ONE Chinese one. Or THREE. The US Navy does not believe in "fighting fair" when they can fight with overwhelming force.
@cutfromfreshman5657
@cutfromfreshman5657 26 күн бұрын
As they should
@timmy_4209
@timmy_4209 Ай бұрын
8:43 It’s a submarine cruise missile!! I didn’t know the US had that kind of technology XD
@Jeffrey.1978
@Jeffrey.1978 Ай бұрын
@timmy_4209 it was just taking a quick dip in the pool on its way out. 😄
@Hurricayne92
@Hurricayne92 Ай бұрын
As someone who has played a fair bit of YuGiOh everytime you said 'MST' i kept thinking about Mystical Space Typhoon 😂
@Jeffrey.1978
@Jeffrey.1978 Ай бұрын
@Grimreapers - Thank you for another great video Cap! I hope you are doing and feeling better. Would you redo this battle? It isn't bad at all, I just think the approach and the order in which weapons are deployed in sequence for the blue side's attack could be made more realistic - not that DCS is realistic anyways. 😅 U.S. carriers still carry a decent amount of Harpoon missiles onboard. They are old missiles, but when combined and launched in sequence with MALDs they could be effective at burning up the defending side's SAM numbers, especially if used in decent numbers. For a redo, I would recommend having a first wave of F/A-18s launching Harpoons and MALDs followed up by a second wave of F/A-18s launching LRASMs and then Makos. F-35C's would be sent out shortly after the first of F/A-18s depart and before the second wave of F/A-18s departs. I'm not sure how many waves you can build into your battle scenario without crashing your server, but it is worth trying.
@jameslarson319
@jameslarson319 Ай бұрын
From what I've gathered, the Harpoon will be replaced with NSM's/LARASMS/Anti Ship tomahawks. I believe in a true fight the f35's would likely be the ones carrying the MAKOS over the f18. Due to the fact that they could launch the missiles and then preform target designation for the f18's serving as missile trucks with AM260's. I could be wrong in this thinking, perhaps it'd be more of a mix across the board. But I do believe the offensive abilities of US carrier groups and their aircraft have truly reached if not surprised what Russian and Chinese groups can offer.
@Decrepit_biker
@Decrepit_biker Ай бұрын
The Mako will actively target vital systems, so even with a small warhead, the kinetic energy and smart precision targeting one or two would make a carrier combat ineffective.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Agreed, but I can;t model it that realistically.
@SuperAd1980
@SuperAd1980 Ай бұрын
Me likey these fleet battles 👍
@peterhans8433
@peterhans8433 Ай бұрын
Sad i hoped he wouldve added at least 1 or 2 constellations to the strike group
@jamison884
@jamison884 Ай бұрын
Not in 2027 sadly. The USN is screwing up the Constellation class. The first ship isn't expected to be completed until 2029 now.
@Thomas-fz9xw
@Thomas-fz9xw Ай бұрын
@@jamison884 "Let's buy the safe, low-capability option that will at least allow us to field a modern naval vessel in a reasonable timeframe for a low cost." "Alright, we changed the entire configuration so it now requires completely different parts. Best we can do is massive delays and overinflated costs while completely underdelivering." Gotta love the USN.
@outrider425
@outrider425 Ай бұрын
@@Thomas-fz9xwthat’s corruption for you
@NWRefund
@NWRefund Ай бұрын
The opposite of Snake Eyes (two aces) is Boxcars (two sixes).
@gizzync1525
@gizzync1525 Ай бұрын
It's going to be really crazy if they get beam weapons up and running too. you could see another big shift in missle load out
@grantgates2931
@grantgates2931 Ай бұрын
I heard LRASM mentioned but didn't see it deployed- were they switched out for the Mako's?
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Correct, I wanted to try MAKO today instead of LRASM.
@zestyranchcroutons
@zestyranchcroutons Ай бұрын
@@grimreapers hey cap, I haven’t watched all your videos so I might be missing it but have you ever messed around with VLS-launched LRASM? On 3 June 2013, Lockheed successfully conducted "push through" tests of a simulated LRASM on the Mk 41 Vertical Launch System (VLS). Four tests verified the LRASM can break the canister's forward cover without damaging the missile. On 17 September 2013, Lockheed launched an LRASM Boosted Test Vehicle (BTV) from a Mk 41 VLS canister. The company-funded test showed the LRASM, fitted with the Mk 114 rocket motor from the RUM-139 VL-ASROC, could ignite and penetrate the canister cover and perform a guided flight profile. In January 2014, Lockheed demonstrated that the LRASM could be launched from a Mk 41 VLS with only modified software to existing shipboard equipment. It’d be really cool to experiment with this idea, I’d be all for it
@robandcheryls
@robandcheryls Ай бұрын
I Chug a beer every time you say “when I said, I meant” 🇨🇦 Army Vet
@saltyfloridaman7163
@saltyfloridaman7163 Ай бұрын
the J-35 has an RCS of 0.02 just saying. the f35 also has radar jamming and vf radar tech that sneaks past rwr. not counting towed decoys
@shtorm2616
@shtorm2616 Ай бұрын
Hey Cap! The USN is planning to retrofit all of their Burkes with RAM launchers instead of the Phalanx (or maybe retain the phalanx and add the RAM? I forgot). Older ships with incompatible radars will get the SeaRam with 11 missiles while the newer ones will get the 21-cell launchers. These will certainly help alot against supersonic cruise missiles. Oh and why were only 31 Mako missiles fired when there were 36 anti ship hornets each with 4 missiles? Or maybe Im missing something? Thanks!
@fraleo2192
@fraleo2192 Ай бұрын
IIRC it was to keep the stern CIWS and and a SeaRam?
@joel91473
@joel91473 Ай бұрын
Currently having issues with the SM-2 and ESSM going haywire after launch and sometimes sinking the launch vessel, only happened after the new update. Anyone getting the same thing or know how to fix it other than just re-installing?
@leepatterson5710
@leepatterson5710 Ай бұрын
I think the few Makos snuck through because of the aircraft taking off and there were only a couple of missiles rather than a massive amount. I do wonder why MSTs do a popup to attack ships?
@AlphaJPM
@AlphaJPM Ай бұрын
While I do love the Mako, I feel like the Navy wouldn't kick out thr LRASM so early, I would think in 2027, its more likely the USN would use both LRASM and Mako in conjunction, which if a strike was timed properly, would be incredibly deadly. Would love to see this battle redone, but with LRASM's included, great battle though Cap, hope your health gets better and
@jesusrosado9867
@jesusrosado9867 Ай бұрын
Good content, but the veteran Chinese wouldn’t be so veteran due to their known lack of training comparing to other countries and specially with the amount of constant training and actual deployments. This is coming from a current sailor in the US navy 2003 till today 20+years in
@guitarSenSenSen
@guitarSenSenSen 12 күн бұрын
If you think that the United States has gained strong military power by invading other regions every day... When I didn‘t say😂
@craigcarter9513
@craigcarter9513 Ай бұрын
Flotilla Friday! Great entertainment. 😊
@bheppes
@bheppes Ай бұрын
Yes, who doesn't love the What-If .. but still no torpedoes?
@debratakahara2494
@debratakahara2494 Ай бұрын
Fun to watch as always. US should have PAC3 by this time which will add a huge advantage for the number of missiles carried. Also the NSM which will still subsonic is low flying and stealthy so the enemy won’t see it coming. I think these would leverage a big advantage to the US. Not to mention things that the sim can’t take into account like more real world experience and better crew training.
@castlekingside76
@castlekingside76 Ай бұрын
Kinetic energy is an amazing thing
@mcdonnell761
@mcdonnell761 Ай бұрын
Are there any models for Dragonfire or the US equivalent?
@delphy2478
@delphy2478 Ай бұрын
i know that you can't do anything about it, but the way that the aircraft for both sides fight at knife fight range is so infuriating
@cyronader
@cyronader Ай бұрын
F-35s are reported to be able to carry the Makos internally
@jameslarson319
@jameslarson319 Ай бұрын
The main criteria for them was being able to fit in the f35 bay, which by the way is the smallest bay out of out fighters/bombers with bays. So if it fits in an f35 it can also fit within the f22, b1b, b21, b2, b52 . Not only that, but it also fits within vertical launchers.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Agreed but I really needed to use the F-35 squadron for A-A.
@floydfarms1578
@floydfarms1578 Ай бұрын
Wouldn’t they have Constellation class in the US carrier group?
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Yup good point, my bad.
@neilcarter77
@neilcarter77 Ай бұрын
Don’t think the first one will actually be in active service until 2029
@oneeyedakuma9448
@oneeyedakuma9448 Ай бұрын
I think the ship class may launch then, but I don't think it'll complete sea trials and be pressed into service until after 2027, so only good ol flight III burkies. I have more of a gripe with the j35a cross section but that's just me 😅
@user-fe5un8ku3j
@user-fe5un8ku3j Ай бұрын
@@grimreapersif you’re gonna put constellations in, you have to throw in a few 054B as well, these fleets are getting big
@resolverbot2167
@resolverbot2167 Ай бұрын
Thanks Cap, been waiting for another big battle for what feels like months. I'm not going to lie I've been skipping a lot of your content lately as I really like the more real world big battle scenarios. but I know those are much harder for you guys to make them. Is it me or did something seem up with the airplane AI on both sides they seemed much dumber than usual or is that because this is single player and usually you mix in a few humans on both sides.
@Dawnbandit1
@Dawnbandit1 Ай бұрын
Hi, Cap. Best of luck on your recovery! I was wondering if your SM-2 Blk IIIC seek has the IR seeker, in addition to SARH and ARH. The IIIC and and IIIB both have dual mode IR/Radar seekers, the IIIC just adds the ARH.
@Raven.flight
@Raven.flight 18 күн бұрын
See, the thing with the Tomahawks is that the battle is over, Chinese Maverick is celebrating on the deck of the Chinese carrier, and suddenly they get hit by a dozen Tomahawks. "Oh, shit, we forgot about them..."
@bigbcor
@bigbcor Ай бұрын
There is no 2027 Chinese carrier group LOL…they still can’t even get a carrier working.
@stupidburp
@stupidburp Ай бұрын
Fully loaded 2027 UK carrier group vs China would be interesting. Give them as many F-35B as will fit in a QE class carrier. Upgraded frigates and such with more and better missiles. NSM, CAMM, etc.
@johndinsdale1707
@johndinsdale1707 Ай бұрын
I suggest you review the roadrunner project and the use of swarm drones with mass replication technology based on ships.
@Trickyrickie
@Trickyrickie Ай бұрын
US carrier carries 75 fighters, it’s very practice as they can hold 90 if needed.
@user-js7ps2jl6x
@user-js7ps2jl6x 2 күн бұрын
Lacks important skills, called combat experience, basically the most important parameter in war
@chrisstopher2277
@chrisstopher2277 Ай бұрын
Carrier battle!!! FUCK YEAH.
@Tyrael112
@Tyrael112 Ай бұрын
Glad your voice held out, Cap. Get better, m8.
@MWSin1
@MWSin1 Ай бұрын
Could a flight of J-15s spotting for takeoff have boosted those Mako hits? Does the destruction of aircraft (or their weapon stores) on a carrier cause any extra damage in the sim?
@TheNerdForAllSeasons
@TheNerdForAllSeasons 9 күн бұрын
That was a fucking brawl. Although the F-35s were basically braindead.
@trentvlak
@trentvlak Ай бұрын
Sweet battle. Did you mention what happened to the LRASM? I missed it. I thought the Super Hornets launched those.
@chanedmund4252
@chanedmund4252 Ай бұрын
They carry mako cuz I think it is better?
@trentvlak
@trentvlak Ай бұрын
@@chanedmund4252 but it's not stealth!
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
I have LRASM but in this battle I really wanted to try MAKO instead of LRASM today.
@trentvlak
@trentvlak Ай бұрын
@@grimreapers cool, cool
@chanedmund4252
@chanedmund4252 Ай бұрын
@@trentvlak it's way faster,HHQ-9 is having a hard time
@MichaelBrandonMcCartney
@MichaelBrandonMcCartney Ай бұрын
The F-35 is only a little bit better than the Chinese knockoff? Awesome video guys!
@Ch1ckeNug01
@Ch1ckeNug01 Ай бұрын
Noooo, F-35 dwarfs all foreign combat aircraft. And that’s not including its INSANE modifications
@jameslarson319
@jameslarson319 Ай бұрын
Am I crazy, but did I miss like 3/4's of the MAKOS? I only think like 16-20 were fired when it should have been more like 60? I mean two groups of 15 planes should be 60. . .
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
I think 34 were fired in total. Once the carrier was sunk, US refused to fire any more, not sure why.
@weaverclips
@weaverclips Ай бұрын
Bet we still habe cruisers in 2.5 years
@jcadlols
@jcadlols Ай бұрын
I wonder what the G limit is carrying those huge anti ship missiles and whether that’s modelled. I’d guess they’re a similar weight to a large bag and most planes are limited to around 3.5-4G with those.
@Krhys1
@Krhys1 Ай бұрын
I have a feeling the Ticonda Rosas will be in service long after 2027...
@timbaskett6299
@timbaskett6299 Ай бұрын
The Tomahawk would be a TASM (Tomahawk Anti Ship Missile) variant. The TLAM is Tomahawk Land Attack Missile. 😂 I didn't know how much you keep up on modern propulsion systems, but I saw that the US "accidentally" make an in atmosphere ion powerplant capable of Mach 10+.I don't know how long it will take before is makes it into a warplanes or missile. A video request, once they get up and running. 2027 Earth Navy's and the Rebels vs. The Star Wars Empire, please.
@SuperAd1980
@SuperAd1980 Ай бұрын
To get the ships to fire as a time on target attack... Would it be possible to spawn in some ships loaded with the slower stuff, then after some time spawn some ships with the fast movers?
@duanemckinley9353
@duanemckinley9353 Ай бұрын
You could, but heavy scripting tends to lead to more bugs than benefit unfortunately.
@SuperAd1980
@SuperAd1980 Ай бұрын
@@duanemckinley9353 I don't mean scripting, just from the mission editor
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Yes but even with just basic missions editor, these battles still go wrong. For instance, sometimes, if you spawn a ship later on, it totally refuses to fire sometimes. Just not worth the risk.
@jmtpolitico80
@jmtpolitico80 17 күн бұрын
So I just noticed that the F/A-18 was carrying the SM-6/AIM-174 missile during RIMPAC, and may have used it in testing as a Anti-Ship Missile to use on the ship they sunk during the exercise. I hear it's normal Naval Defense Range as a SM-6 is 240 Miles which is huge, but imagine what it is with a Jet at Mach 1.3 at 35,000 feet. I bet it come close to 300 miles in either Anti-Ship or Air-to-Air! That's a awesome development! And I wonder if they took these little things and try them cause of the Data NCIS took from you and I am sure lots of other people. DCS, and you guys that have just DCS YT channels have probably Improved the NAVY and Air Force more than we could think and will ever know. If they did take it from your data, cause I do remember a video a ways back that you did, with I think the Hornet carrying the AIM-174/SM-6. Not sure if it was prior to them taking your data or after. But either way, I think the people that do Improve the Navy or any branch of the military from your data, should get Credit at least for it. At least a plaque or something!!!! This was my 2nd time watching it cause it has a lot of different things going on in this mission, like the Tomahawk Anti-Ship missile and the New Mako. And I noticed even more than I already knew, but China copies everyone's Military equipment. Like the F-35, the HHQ air defense missiles are copied from the S-300/400 Systems. I wonder if China is rethinking the systems, although they didn't do the exact same thing, so they are probably better. Cause I think China's Tech is way better than Russia's. We know from the War with Russia, that their Space System and Satellites are absolutely Useless. And they have to get their Satellite Photos from China. And that is Putin's downfall! Cause China owns him now, and after this war ends Russia will be at its weakest, and I bet China will go after the Territory Russia took back in the day, what the 19th Century or early 20th century. I actually am really starting to think XII will not go after Taiwan cause they know they will lose and their economy will hit Rock Bottom. But if they go after their Territory Russia stole, the World really will not care and all Chinese Sanctions would be lifted and if they want Territory, well they have a rightful claim to take their Territory back. Cause if you think about it, Taiwan would end up destroyed and be absolutely useless for 25-50 years after. Which means nothing to XII cause he'd be dead by then. But Thank You GR for your Great Videos, they really give people like me a lot of Information & Intel on everyone's system! I understand it is a game/simulation so nothing is exact, but I think you have the best channel for being the closest to exact in real life. Thanks CAP & TEAM GR!!! And Thanks as well CH!!!
@stephenwalling5878
@stephenwalling5878 Ай бұрын
They will have to face three or four carriers. So good luck.
@babernethy13574
@babernethy13574 28 күн бұрын
Love these mock battles and the estimated cost...but where are the subs?
@zachcox94
@zachcox94 Ай бұрын
33:50 My best guess is that a Mako impacted onto a J-15B and it's ASMs blew up on the carrier.
@Gunni1972
@Gunni1972 Ай бұрын
Why no AAmissiles counted for team blue?
@zohan90210
@zohan90210 Ай бұрын
*places obligatory hate mail in mailbox*
@tjmccarble5522
@tjmccarble5522 Ай бұрын
FINALLY!!
@christophero55
@christophero55 Ай бұрын
American Viewington Hatemail: I hate that you were feeling too sick to record and that we didn't have your wonderfully weird brand of comedic commentary for a while, but I sure am glad you are feeling well enough that we have you back. (No disrespect to those who stepped in for Cap while he was gone you did a great job.)
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
:)
@berwandekker2559
@berwandekker2559 Ай бұрын
Hey Cap, can you try a time-on-target US strike on a Chinese carrier group using LRASM and MAKO? The idea being that the MAKO saturates the defenses and radar channels allowing the LRASM to slip through.
@uurkisme
@uurkisme Ай бұрын
A Dingo ate my baby
@aaronchung9838
@aaronchung9838 Ай бұрын
Great battle, its probably not possible in DCS but it would be great if misslies changed targets based on whats been destroyed, and if ships were disabled by one missle since CV's wouldnt be able to launch planes for a while after even a small missle hit and destroyers sould be blinded since their radars ate extremely delicate (maybe they could still use CWIS or IR missle like rim 116).
@goccia78
@goccia78 Ай бұрын
SIM ??
@jonathanbaum3499
@jonathanbaum3499 Ай бұрын
Heal up soon.
@fireraptor6670
@fireraptor6670 Ай бұрын
With Mako missiles having so much kinetic energy the explosion is a lot bigger than the actual warhead. Also if 2 missiles hit the carrier near the waterline couldn't that be enough to sink it?
@EthanX1ao
@EthanX1ao Ай бұрын
Why don't the fighter jets participate in subsonic missile interception?
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
We can do that BUT if I script them to do that then they usually will not do their main task, so it;s best just to ask them not to do it.
@HistoryIsDead
@HistoryIsDead Ай бұрын
winner faces off with the British latest carrier group? Would love to see HMS Queen Elizabeth in action.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Already working on it.
@BlackLiger788
@BlackLiger788 Ай бұрын
"Gee year fal con"
@aztec0112
@aztec0112 Ай бұрын
On the forums, CH's missiles got pooched by the most recent update. Has that been resolved or, is this prior to the update?
@MarkHitle
@MarkHitle Ай бұрын
anyway you could also include the submarines that are typically with CSG's? I don't know if DCS has them or not.
Heartwarming Unity at School Event #shorts
00:19
Fabiosa Stories
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
The F-35 in Gaming
25:13
Mimiaga
Рет қаралды 70 М.
US Nuclear War Simulation in REALTIME!!!
10:46
Modern Muscle
Рет қаралды 3,3 М.
The Ship the Japanese Couldn’t Sink
17:47
Yarnhub
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
Why the US is NOT afraid of the largest Navy in the world, yet
22:36
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 3 МЛН
Teaching My Friends DCS
8:16
Capachili
Рет қаралды 223 М.
КОРОЧЕ ГОВОРЯ, ИГРЫ - СБОРНИК OneTwo
34:06
ИГРАЮ ЗА ОТЦА 😱 В SchoolBoy | SchoolBoy Runaway
19:56
ЛИГЛЕЙЧИК
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Жаңа үйімді ЖЫЛАНДАР басып алды!
19:13