Only RDR2 surpasses them, because GTA V is more arcade.

@@charlyg-2590 I'm with you on RDR2, GTA V Physics are well, Terrible Add a few physic mods and it's fine, but vanilla GTA V is Bad.

Fr facts

@@34_Brayan-Montanezit’s not that bad compared to recent games

​@@34_Brayan-Montanezit was supposed to have better Ragdolls but the ps 3/xbox 360 couldn't handle it well and can be easily unlocked with mods and the car physics was made arcadey because people complained about gta 4 driving being so hard

In Gta 4, ragdoll/physics are much smoother and fluid. You will notice this very clearly when you shoot NPCs. Additionally, NPCs will attempt to remain balanced in real time while in ragdoll/physics state. In Rdr1, ragdoll/physics are stiffer. It's not very fluid (compared to Gta 4). And NPCs don't try to stay balanced in a ragdoll/physics state. But headshots are a lot of fun in this game.

​@@MinecraftvsBurnout i like red dead 1 Physics more i like the overly dramatic ragdoll animation's after i had shot someone in the Chest it's funny and it makes satisfying kills

​@@MinecraftvsBurnoutI like the way NPCs react to being shot more in RDR1.

@@Monkeyamingus777 Yes. Also, headshots are much more satisfying in Rdr1. But it's still not as fluid as Gta 4's Euphoria physics. Shooting an NPC in Gta 4 is the most fluid thing.

@@John-996 Headshots in Rdr1 are extremely fun. But, in Rdr1 Euphoria physics received some modifications. For this reason, the reactions are a mixture of real-time physics and animation. (To feel more of the spaghetti western) Still, Gta 4's Euphoria physics are much more fluid. In this game, NPCs react fluidly when they are shot in a way that has never been seen before. Everything is calculated completely in real time. It does not contain animation. Still, both games have fun physics in their own way.

But you can't drive them

@@krod1248 Really? I didn't know that.

@@krod1248you can though. It’s literally in the files they just forgot to implement sounds for the engine

​@@Bugplanet8840well they forgot to implement it in the gameplay lol

Those are GTA 4's vanilla physics du###ss

@@san_murat_131 shrimp that's the GTA 4 enhancer 4.0 mod. It changed the atmosphere, the og atmosphere is black and gritty

Cap

Nah rdr1 had better physics and a more fun gunplay experience, plus the artsyle is perfect

@@Bugplanet8840 I will say it does have a better art style but NO WAY DID YOU SAY PHYSICS there slow asf in RDR and by that time they were already trying to make the physics worse wich happened in RDR-rdr2 and gta v. Gta4 was always funner given the fact that it had more stuff to do

@@iammiller5478 that’s really all you could say bro💀

@@Gunslinger.Chronicles agree to disagree but they are improved in rdrI take the rose glasses off friend

I'd say that they both are great

RDR1 wins by having rural areas and more animals.

Yes

Both great but RDR1 had such more

​@@charlyg-2590 u make no sense rdr Don't have traffic nd cities

I think its enhancer 4.0

Delete your comments and just put it all in 1 comment instead of cluttering. The comment thread

​@@Bugplanet8840And why don't you delete your account and stop fooling around?

Because its mods

Eh, no. In Gta 4, ragdoll/physics are much smoother and fluid. You will notice this very clearly when you shoot NPCs. Additionally, NPCs will attempt to remain balanced in real time while in ragdoll/physics state. In Rdr1, ragdoll/physics are stiffer. It's not very fluid. And NPCs don't try to stay balanced in a ragdoll/physics state. But headshots are a lot of fun in this game.

@@MinecraftvsBurnout which is exactly why rdr1 is better, it has real time skeleton physics unlike gta 4

@@Bugplanet8840 Either you misunderstood my comment or you didn't read it completely. Gta 4 has real-time balancing physics. And, unlike Rdr1, it is very easy to trigger the Euphoria physics in Gta 4. When you touch an NPC with a car, when you walk to the NPC, or when you shot it with a gun, it immediately switches to real-time balacing physics/ragdoll state. In Rdr1, they "downgraded" all of this a little bit. In Rdr1, when you walk to the NPC, it doesn't immediately go into ragdoll/physics state. Or when we touch the NPC with the horse, it doesn't immediately go into ragdoll/physics state. If you touch/walk to NPCs for a little too long, they will just go into ragdoll/physics state. But NPCs won't try to stay balanced too much. They will fall to the ground as if they have just forgotten how to walk. The same goes for shooting NPCs with a gun. (They will die immediately from the chest area, arm and hand anyway) But even if they don't die, they will throw themselves to the ground. As you can see, the "immediately switching to smart ragdoll/physics state and staying in real-time balance" thing in Gta 4 has been removed in Rdr1. But of course, Rdr1's Euphoria physics are still good. Much better than Gta 5 and Rdr2's Euphoria.

​@@MinecraftvsBurnoutBut that thing in GTA IV was not realistic. Everything In this game it's exaggerated, the game's NPCs don't have a human skeleton, they look extremely soft. Even when you bump into them, they don't react in a realistic way (either bodily speaking, or in a rational way). In real life, when a person is bumped, they are not taken as a role, without fighting back and Stare at the person who bumped you. In a shootout, you don't go soft when you get shot in the leg, in a sudden way. About an NPC getting shot in the chest and arms, and dying immediately, show me a video proving what you're saying. The chest is a very vital part during combat, it is no wonder that the bulletproof vest is on the chest as well. But anyway, the ragdoll in GTA IV is exaggerated, everything in this game is exaggerated!

@@Lo0pingGG Man, if NPCs in Gta 4 didn't have skeletons, they wouldn't be trying to stay balanced in real time. So they would immediately fall to the ground like jelly/liquid. In this game, the NPCs are in a ragdoll state while the NPCs will try to stay balanced as long as they can (like a real person would). And they will do it in real time. Of course, if there is a slope, obstacle, etc. where they step, they will either be more successful in balancing or they will fall. When you walk towards/gentle push the NPC, the NPC will try to stay balanced and start walking in the direction you pushed it. (Yes in this case, the NPC will act a bit weird/drunk) However, when you slowly push the NPCs with the car, they will try to protect themselves and their balance. Thanks to the real-time and smart ragdoll system (Euphoria). This ragdoll/physics always gives unpredictable results. If you shoot the NPC in the leg, you will see it stumble, bending slightly and holding its leg with its hands. (different each time) Sometimes they will also fall to the ground. Of course, if you shoot the NPC in both legs, it will fall to the ground. (That NPC shouldn't be able to get up after this, but that's the mechanics of the game completely, not the ragdoll) There is no exaggeration, except that sometimes NPCs appear to be too drunk when in a ragdoll state. (And of course bike accidents are exaggerated) This is the most complex and advanced ragdoll/physics yet. Even in new generation games the physics are not close to this. Coming back to the Rdr1 topic, a person named "Sly" makes Rdr1 compilations. But in his videos, he always shoots NPCs either in the head or in the chest. I can say okay with the part where NPCs die directly from the chest. There are vital organs such as the heart. As I said before, it is partly annoying when they die directly from the shoulder or arm. That is, they even die from hands (rarely). But if you want real and understandable proof, I recommend you play the game. The game itself will help you understand or see.

no

Did you comment 6 fckn times?!

​@@Shrok7833yes any problem with that?

​@@charlyg-2590well yes

Delete your comments and just put it all in 1 comment instead of cluttering. The comment thread

​@@Bugplanet8840never.

There's no sense to compare GTA V with RDR2 because GTA V was regress at many many points of physics and details. There are some things that GTA V did better than GTA IV, but in the end GTA IV game from 2008 or 2009 (not sure) have still one of the best physics in the history of video games. And the only game that beats it up is RDR2. I think GTA VI is going to be even better but so far GTA IV has mechanics that today's games still don't have.

Yh it’s very slow when you fall in rdr1 for some odd reason and fighting feels slow and unresponsive wich would have made it better than gta4 if they kept the physics and the good gameplay like in gta4

Physics is not why people play games. GTA 4 physics are overrated af. Helicopters don't create holes in seas and neither does crashing a bike send you to space

You're right, man. In Gta 4, ragdoll/physics are much smoother and fluid. You will notice this very clearly when you shoot NPCs. Additionally, NPCs will attempt to remain balanced in real time while in ragdoll/physics state. In Rdr1, ragdoll/physics are stiffer. It's not very fluid (compared to Gta 4). And NPCs don't try to stay balanced in a ragdoll/physics state. But headshots are a lot of fun in this game.

Nah it improved them

Fr

In your dreams

rdrI expanded on gtaIV so it’s actually better than gta IV but you believe what you want. Fact doesnt change that rdrI is better

@@Bugplanet8840 biggest gta4 opp=you

Gta 4 is smoother and more fluid in terms of physics/ragdoll. But, still, Rdr1's physics are not bad.