HESH vs Composite Armor | T-72 |Armor Penetration Simulation

Рет қаралды 443,350

Жыл бұрын

HESH shell simulation vs Composite Armor.
155MM HESH at 680 m/s
Explosive - 11.7kg Comp. A-3
The weight and type of the explosive correspond to the 155mm HEP T152 projectile (T58 Heavy Tank shell)
Vs
T-72 hull front armor
60mm RHA
2 x 52mm glass textolite
50mm RHA

Пікірлер: 396

@dejmianxyzsimulations4174 Жыл бұрын

In fact, the armor worked because no large pieces of armor were ejected. A homogeneous armor plate would not stand a chance.

@satanhell_lord Жыл бұрын

That's what I figured, there is a crack, but no obvious fragments or chunks who went flying off

@fabiomasellis8132 Жыл бұрын

So It would only be a big emotional event for the driver

@perfectlynormalhuman5473 Жыл бұрын

@@satanhell_lord They don't have to be obvious to do damage

@Slavkovic_Predrag Жыл бұрын

Obviously it was made to stop 105mm hesh that was most common in 1970s. It would be interesting to see t72B with 60 10 10 20 20 50 armor.

@Zander10102 Жыл бұрын

Fascinating! Keep up the good work!

@facundofandino Жыл бұрын

It is surprising that the base of the projectile was still almost intact and moving forward after the explosion, nice work!

@Bialy_1 Жыл бұрын

That is a good indicator that something is wrong with this simulation... the detonation looks to me also premature and the trajectory is too flat.

@sigmamale4147 Жыл бұрын

@@Bialy_1 yeah internet expert im sure you are right

@BugThorn Жыл бұрын

@@Bialy_1 sure, and what you think is gonna happen with something so solid with that energy ? It stops and goes back or what? Jesus and trajectory my god.

@PrinzAquatic Жыл бұрын

@@Bialy_1 yeah sure, a HESH should explode 1 meters inside the tank with a ICBM curve trajectory

@truisticprince Жыл бұрын

@@Bialy_1 see idk about you, but looking at test targets for hesh you can clearly see where the base impacted the plate.

@moosiemoose1337 Жыл бұрын

Wow! That would be absolutely terrifying. Great simulation as always!

@tfk_001 Жыл бұрын

it wouldn't be terrifying - you need to be alive to feel terror

@korbetthein3072 Жыл бұрын

@@tfk_001 The crew would survive. I don't see much indication of microshrapnel, and the crack is pretty clean. Shaken? Surely, but definitely not dead.

@the_jingo Жыл бұрын

Getting shot by anything would be terrifying

@bondhesh7372 Жыл бұрын

the drivers balls would have been crushed

@hhhhhhhhh1071 Ай бұрын

Imagine the armor touching you instead of you touching it

@KekusMagnus Жыл бұрын

resisted much better than a pure 110mm RHA plate would have, composite armor definitely works. The driver may be wounded but the tank would probably be fine

@xXxNECROMONGERxXx Жыл бұрын

"driver may be wounded" is a comical understatement in this scenario. The driver is smeared all over the gunner and commander's feet.

@jammygamer8961 Жыл бұрын

"Maybe wounded" Did you see how much the inside plate deformed?

@zhufortheimpaler4041 Жыл бұрын

@@jammygamer8961 yeah thats deformation. the inside would be layered with Kevlar/Aramid against spalling. So yeah the frontal armor is compromised but there is not neccesarily injury on the inside

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

@@xXxNECROMONGERxXx I suggest you go back and watch all of his vid again.

@parallax9084 Жыл бұрын

The driver isnt wounded at all.

@insertyournamehere4328 Жыл бұрын

I was surprised about result because I’ve expected textolites would completely absorb the HESH, but as the result, energy of detonation transmitted something like a Newton’s cradle. This is probably one of the reasons why some spaces added in the constructions of later T-72s’ composite armors

@justanordinaryaccount9910 Жыл бұрын

That's 155 mm HESH so it's quite massive. Typical 105/120 mm tank she'll would probably be stopped entirely.

@GordonMusliman Жыл бұрын

Tanked it like a boss. Considering the huge difference between 120/105mm and 155mm HESH i think T-72 was really well protected against HESH. I wonder about the interaction between ERA and HESH but i suppose i can never see that.

@xt6wagon Жыл бұрын

even an empty ERA box would help quite a bit. Explosion is farther away from the actual armor and the box will at a minimum eat a bit of energy too.

@etuanno Жыл бұрын

I'm pretty sure the ERA would help, especially since the blast wouldn't hit the armor directly. The whole idea behind HESH is to create massive spalling inside the tank and for that a continuous armor (not composite) is most beneficial.

@AG-ig8uf Жыл бұрын

@@etuanno ERA has its own explosive, which would add to HESH, so it's not as clear cut if ERA would help, or make things worse. Kinetic impact of HESH is more than enough to flatten explosive ERA plates against tanks surface, then detonate both ERA and HESH.

@etuanno Жыл бұрын

@@AG-ig8uf Ahaaa, excellent point! If it happens as you say, then it could work like you explained.

@Hollow_Aty Жыл бұрын

@@AG-ig8uf Isn't the explosion that ERA cause, will somewhat be a wall against the HESH explosion (although not an unbeatable wall) since the explosion from ERA will face the explosion of the HESH and suppress some of the energy? (i know there is a lot of the word "explosion" in this comment...)

@nsb8816 Жыл бұрын

I would be glad to see the damages done to the insides of the tank, just like in the miniature. I know it is much more complicated but it is the next step into the simulation.

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

Wdym? He said this is a older project that he did not have the witness plate modeled. But even without one, driver has much higher chance of relitively minor injury than ded in this case. If you are asking for pressure sim, there is a chance his model might fail to compute (solution time too long). If you are asking for stuff inside the vehicle modeled, then I doubt a super computer can do that.

@duytranuc4025 Жыл бұрын

@@jintsuubest9331 t72 have a spall liner, right behind that plate, is a part of NBC system in the tank

@etuanno Жыл бұрын

If he gets a LOT more computing power then he could expand his models. This simulation likely took several days to compute.

@romankovalev7894 Жыл бұрын

Inside, even with much greater penetration, minor damage, but chips of molten metal can damage the tanker, blind, concuss, stun. There are no large pieces - the probability is small

@ZETH_27 7 ай бұрын

A witnessplate would probably be enough

@edi9892 Жыл бұрын

Are there any experiments or estimates for low velocity impacts? For instance, if a 50 ton tank rams a light tank with only 20mm armour, or when a building collapses onto the tank... I know that there's data on driving over trees and into walls. An acquaintance was stuck in a tank in WWII when they tried to hide their tank from an air raid and parked it inside a hall next to a church. The enemy bombed the church and the tower fell onto the hall and their tank...

@connorfox1238 Жыл бұрын

Can you explain different composition of armours in a video format, such as nera vs rolled armour

@danielwer6488 Жыл бұрын

Wow, ive never expected that hesh will be that effective

@teejin669 Жыл бұрын

HESH is awesome but also keep in mind this was a 155mm hesh round

@KekusMagnus Жыл бұрын

this is the giant 155mm HESH chosen specifically because the smaller ones wouldn't be nearly as effective

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

15cm block of explosive will do something.

@allent.g560 Жыл бұрын

But the armour still intact and no pieces were ejected into the driver compartment.

@va_rio845 Жыл бұрын

@@allent.g560 shockwave surely would hurts the crew

@4T3hM4kr0n Жыл бұрын

working as intended! Belt just ended up buckling really hard. (drivers going to be scared shitless at all that deformation, at least its not like the APFSDS video where he lost his head completlely)

@mikek9297 Жыл бұрын

Unfortunately for the T72, most hits it takes aren't shots from the front into it's strongest armor plate. I wonder what would it look like if HESH hit the autoloader ammo magazine...

@juavi6987 Жыл бұрын

@@mikek9297 Therefore it would need to penetrate the hull first

@mikek9297 Жыл бұрын

@@juavi6987 Not necessarily. The whole point of HESH rounds is not to penetrate but to cause spalling of the internal armor layers by shockwave from high explosives.

@sibsnake Жыл бұрын

@@mikek9297 you just gave us a meaning of penetration

@chocokingchocolate1273 Жыл бұрын

Really cool thumbnail

@arkrainflood Жыл бұрын

question: what kind of damage does a hesh blast wave do to components of a tank? (antennas, optic sights, lights, calibration of various control systems) might the blast wave distort the barrel even a little to compromise its accuracy?

@PikaPilot Жыл бұрын

This is a fascinating simulation! The armor successfully prevented damage from getting to the crew, but it absolutely would not survive a second shell. The HESH damages a large area, which deforms the armor far more extensively than solid AP would.

@perfectlynormalhuman5473 Жыл бұрын

The driver would get shredded. Remember about spalling bro.

@PikaPilot Жыл бұрын

@@perfectlynormalhuman5473 no large pieces of armor were ejected. The driver would be protected from residual spall by wearing Kevlar

@perfectlynormalhuman5473 Жыл бұрын

@@PikaPilot The driver doesn't wear kevlar lol... also, spalling doesnt need to be large to do damage. Basically only thing that could help in this case would be the NBC lining, which is very often missing.

@korbetthein3072 Жыл бұрын

@@perfectlynormalhuman5473 I actually don't see any of the telltale signs of microshrapnel, and even less indication of conventional shrapnel. Anything that did get ejected would probably be stopped by somewhat thick clothing.

@annamorawska8281 Жыл бұрын

Great simulation

@Wolfy8668 Жыл бұрын

Driver: I don't think I want to be a soldier anymore

@retr0_fps Жыл бұрын

I wonder if it would be possible to simulate a human 70cm away from the plate as a "witness" or can only metals be simulated ? is it very ressource intensiv ?

@xXxNECROMONGERxXx Жыл бұрын

I wish this video had a witness plate to see how badly the spalling would damage a tank occupant. That armor deformation looks brutal on the interior. Thanks for the simulation!

@petrmelichar3565 Жыл бұрын

No large pieces, armour have done its job, kevlar plate behind armour would catch any possible separated pieces from that bend. Driver would therefore sustain most probably only emotional damage + earache

@KoishiVibin Жыл бұрын

@@petrmelichar3565 What about driver pants?

@etuanno Жыл бұрын

@@KoishiVibin There's a reason why he wears brown pants.

@KoishiVibin Жыл бұрын

@@etuanno Ah, I see. Ingenious soviet design once more!

@perfectlynormalhuman5473 Жыл бұрын

@@petrmelichar3565 A large majority of T-72s dont have kevlar lining. So the driver would probably get a permanent life ban.

@b2tall239 6 ай бұрын

Remember, it's not always about definitive penetration. The concussive effects of HESH (or even regular artillery) can wreak havoc on the crew or the tank's internal systems.

@jojomojo Жыл бұрын

Can you please simulate a BR-412 hitting the turret cupola (commander optics) of any tank (for example, M48)? Including a filler explosion.

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

If you are asking if the explosion will kill the entire crew... The answer is no. Commander is not in good shape. Gunner and loader might receive some injury but they are more worry about the loud bang from the explosion.

@Fms_43procent Ай бұрын

Its old composite armor. The new one has five layers: 3 metal plates and two glass textolite

@kptkarp5581 Жыл бұрын

how much would a shorter och longer fuze delay effect the spalling inside the tank?

@whitescar2 Жыл бұрын

With some stand-off distance between the plates, probably even less of an impact. Now that they're together, the shockwave can propagate.

@albertogiavani75 7 ай бұрын

T-72B armor has gaps in it for this reason maybe

@RamdomView Жыл бұрын

Request a similar situation, but without the inner plates to simulate the effects of corruption.

@snoohh2513 Жыл бұрын

Nice video request answered, HESH is way more effective than i thought it would've been.

@akid1263 Жыл бұрын

this is a 155mm, anything less than that would be close to no effect on the plate

@dwarfc0366 Жыл бұрын

How about simulating shrapnel from an HE shell impacting ground near a SPG like 2S19 and maybe something like M109?

@ft3848 Жыл бұрын

If the whole plate is RHA, will the deformation rate and deflection of the back plate be greater?

@thefrub Жыл бұрын

What kind of pressure wave would that deformation cause for the crew? Ruptured eardrums or ruptured organs?

@steingrenadier5511 Жыл бұрын

A witness plate for all your simulations would be nice.

@Forbiddina Жыл бұрын

Yep, a 6 inch shell hurt it pretty bad. But it’d probably do just fine for the calibers that it was intended to block 105/120mm. I’m still curious how much that would screw up the rest of the sensitive systems. But that’s beyond a simple simulation

@NK-qn6pq Жыл бұрын

It would probably take awhile for the crew to regain their hearing...

@lucaswallace7476 Жыл бұрын

Imagine being the driver and seeing the armour plate just *crack* in front of you

@WorldOfTanksFakeChannel 3 ай бұрын

“Great shot”

@DefinitelyNotAnAddict Жыл бұрын

Do Hesh vs M1 Abrams side turret

@user-ny6wf2rp7cwpvv1 Жыл бұрын

Can you make T64 armor test please?

@KianaRYN Жыл бұрын

where are you find the glass textolite materials ?

@arandombloxxer4273 Жыл бұрын

That should be terrifying for the driver

@expatingermany7685 Жыл бұрын

I'd never fire a HESH at an MBT although I've fired HESH at hard targets before but just for training purposes. In reality we'd only use the ( my gereneration) APDS or APFSDS

@Silo-Ren Жыл бұрын

I gotta admit, I was truly surprised. I thought that HESH would cause some kind of an issue with almost any armor. I know for sure below the turret they can, but big surprise.

@heyhoe168 Жыл бұрын

Nope. Composite armour counters HESH just fine. Spaced out with air works as well.

@Zadlo14 Жыл бұрын

You haven't done pressure chart - and some people will argue that the shell overpressured the crew compartment

@paulleader4 Жыл бұрын

The crew would be hearing a ringing sound for the next few years lol I couldn't imagine the sound

@staffancallert 7 ай бұрын

The Hesh was ment for the T-54-55 in the 50:ths because of it cupola shaped turret wish was immune to subcalibre ammo. Today the Hesh is not the ammo of choice for spaced armour.

@viperlabs7735 Жыл бұрын

And that’s what you call a significant emotional event

@henriknemeth3370 Жыл бұрын

Unrelated question, but I am curious whether there is a difference between the energy required to penetrate one thick plate and 2 or more separate plates laid on top of each other, if they are of equal thickness.

@Snailman3516 Жыл бұрын

Layering armor is generally more effective than solid blocks. For more kinetic and shaped charge penetrators, the layers break up the penetrator that a homogenous slab would keep together. For a hesh shell, the layering can break up the shockwave. Layered spaced armor is kind a primitive form of composite if you think about it. The composite is just steel and air though.

@GordonMusliman Жыл бұрын

@@Snailman3516 Stuff like rubber and textolite were added and modern definition of composite armor was born after people realized air isn't very effective at stopping the HEAT jet.

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

It depends. As the td ratio increasingly favor the penetrator, the thinner the plate, the more the plate has a decrease efficiency compare to a monoblock plate. This is assuming plate are tightly packed. The take away is the delta should not be too big, and is simply margin of error in some cases. But the monoblock should almost always perform better. That being said, if we throw in angle and spacing, shit gets out of hand real fast.

@deathdragon2283 Жыл бұрын

Slapping two layers of steel on top of each other is less effective than a single homogeneous steel plate of the same thickness and material. This has been largely understood since the days of ironclad warships. Though this isn’t true for a HEAT warhead. The resulting penetration would be identical against both set ups. You need either an empty space between the plates, or the plates need to be made of different materials optimized to best support each other

@paulmccarthy8658 11 ай бұрын

What would the cost of repair be. How badly compromised is the armor ?

@gamecubekingdevon3 Жыл бұрын

so, tank probably immobilised with driver wounded or dead, but rest of the tank seem like it would be operationnal enough to return fire

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

Maybe. We do not know what kind of effect this hit has on the optics and gun system.

@azuaraikrezeul1677 Жыл бұрын

And that's why you don't cheap out on spall liners

@mariebcfhs9491 Жыл бұрын

a spall liner should catch the rest of the splinters

@trigger5915 Жыл бұрын

What software was this simulation from?

@piercehamilton7035 Жыл бұрын

how do you simulate these? like what program. and how long does it take to run the simulations?

@jackd1582 Жыл бұрын

Hours ....to days ...? 😯

@masterofrockets Жыл бұрын

Can you have two layers of explosive reactive armor?

@MetalX34 Жыл бұрын

it got the driver's heart without hitting him

@everythingphil9376 Жыл бұрын

Do you have videos of WW2 rounds like the 75mm and 88mm, striking modern armor?

@xt6wagon Жыл бұрын

They do better than you'd think because modern armor is all about stopping thin things with high energy. Either a penetrator rod or a HEAT jet. So big smashy thing overperforms. So frontal armor WW2 stuff pokes holes in the outer plate and thats it, inner hull is fine. The side? works just fine because no one has yet figured out how to armor a side effectively to make a heavy tank. ERA covered sideskirts maybe save you.

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

He did 128 vs xm1 hull

@MPdude237 Жыл бұрын

This was more effective than I predicted. I thought the textolite would have absorbed the energy and nothing happens on the other side. If there was some space, it would have been far less effective. Even if the armor isn’t penetrated, spalling could injure or kill the driver, damaged equipment, and also compromised a rather large section of armor. Also, what HESH round is the one modeled here? One fired from an L7, 120mm, or the 183mm from the FV4005?

@LeadHeadBOD Жыл бұрын

From description - 155mm HEP T152, fired from T58 Heavy tank. The US was using and considering HESH quite often, despite how it's often regarded as a fetish for the British.

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

@@LeadHeadBOD US consider everything. Only thing US does not seems to get into is steel rod. I remember reading archive of US seriously considering the possibility of steam engine in the xm1 program.

@etuanno Жыл бұрын

The crew is most likely alive because no chunks were flying off. The small shrapnels would be caught in the spall liner that protects against exactly that. But what happens to the rest of the tank, I have no idea. Most likely most of the optics are blown off.

@MPdude237 Жыл бұрын

@@etuanno The armor did get cracked open and based off other simulations, this usually means some spalling.

@mirroredvoid8394 Жыл бұрын

@@jintsuubest9331 Steam engines have near unlimited range all you need is water and something to burn. Most likely startup time is what holds it back.

@Agm1995gamer Жыл бұрын

It did alot more damage than i thought it would. Now imagine 2 of these shots to the same spot.

@sting2death2 Жыл бұрын

Well it's 155mm There's a lot of punch in that caliber.

@heycidskyja4668 Жыл бұрын

Actually, it seems far LESS effective than I would have predicted. I expected the front plate to completely collapse from a HESH shell.

@LOKSTED Жыл бұрын

The sound and cracks enough for the crews to shit their pants

@AndrejCibik Жыл бұрын

Do a simulation of liquid filled aluminum, lets say a plane wing, hitting steel beam at 600 mph :)

@ME262MKI Жыл бұрын

Worked but after that damage, that plate is completely useless

@arrogleinadtra 4 ай бұрын

The more filling the more destructive it is, am i right?

@petesheppard1709 Жыл бұрын

A followup shot would do the job. It’s an axiom among tankers to keep shooting until the target changes shape or burns.

@stevenbreach2561 Жыл бұрын

I,d follow a Hesh up with a Sabot,that would ruin their whole day

@EdyAlbertoMSGT3 10 ай бұрын

Hopefully though since it's a 155mm fired from what i assume is a heavy tank, the T-72 could just try to escape, if no important components died

@Black_Kakari Жыл бұрын

Epic

@xpavpushka Жыл бұрын

Outside: It's fine Inside: I shat my pants

@freefiremclin9379 Жыл бұрын

Imagine being a crewman and seeing that in front of your face

@mcplthivierge Жыл бұрын

...sure- the armor might not have spalled, but I'd be willing to bet the crew is not happy- a smack on the side of a tank with a ball-pein hammer is enough to ring your ears, let alone 20-something pounds of mild-steel encased explosive detonating against it...

@StudSupreme Жыл бұрын

How would a standard 120mm HEAT round work against the same armor?

@76456 Жыл бұрын

This armour has 450mm agaist HEAT. Anything that has more than 450mm pen will go trought. I think early 120mm HEAT have 400-420. More modern ones reaching 500mm

@sting2death2 4 ай бұрын

Could you test HESH vs ERA?

@claudiovic9883 Жыл бұрын

Brooo, the 165mm will probably collapse it :O if War Thunder isnt' lying, the shell has more than 20kg of equivalent tnt

@justliech3948 Жыл бұрын

could you try the british 183mm HESH just for the fun of it?

@AlreadyTakenTag Жыл бұрын

The force from the impact would immediately knock out the crew.

@orange8175 Жыл бұрын

that would just nuke the tank

@deathdragon2283 Жыл бұрын

I wanna see the front plate get stuffed through the back of the tank lmao

@Jesse-qy6ur Жыл бұрын

Question: In what ways is glass textolite different from fiberglass? Are they similar?

@dejmianxyzsimulations4174 Жыл бұрын

Glass textolite is kind of like a form of glass fiber

@jackd1582 Жыл бұрын

@@dejmianxyzsimulations4174 🤔 If that textolite was kevlar 🤔? Or non burning spider's web🕵️

@tomk3732 Жыл бұрын

It is plastic and glass. US experimented with pure glass and so did Soviets. But Soviets were the ones to figure out adding plastics to it.

@qaterdargon4041 Жыл бұрын

Lets see it stand against the Besh shell

@jakearmstrong2127 Жыл бұрын

I have 2 questions 1, how much degradation in performance would the armour see after being hit because it did seem to crack. And 2, what are the psychological issues involved with this. You can't tell me the crew of this tank wouldn't be stunned at least

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

We couldn't really simulate #2, so I will let that to you to research. For #1, after the damage, it likely would not stand against even 100mm ap.

@jakearmstrong2127 Жыл бұрын

@@jintsuubest9331 that's similar to my thoughts. I figured the armour was pretty weakened after that. And I bet that isn't easily repairable

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

@@jakearmstrong2127 It would have to get send back to factory with spare hull armor, remove it, and put a now one. However that is just the armor, there might be other system that's damaged. It is more likely the vehicle will get scraped for parts.

@pozarnic Жыл бұрын

А урон по башне и действие на подбашеный лист?

@thewakeup5459 Жыл бұрын

What would happen if a HE detonated underneath a t72. Would the bottom of the tank be able to absorb the blast on not?

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

Depends on how much boom there is.

@thewakeup5459 Жыл бұрын

@@jintsuubest9331 let's say 152mm shell

@1joshjosh1 Жыл бұрын

Sooooo.... if there was some sort of shrapnel blanket the crew would have been okay?? 🤔. It's hard to tell on this one.

@zephyro76 Жыл бұрын

Nice

@johndoe5440 Жыл бұрын

that's insane wtf

@tectonicallyinsane3450 Жыл бұрын

Rarely show anything penetrate armor like wtf thats what I want to see!

@RandomGamer-v6u 10 сағат бұрын

Request FV4005 HESH vs T90m frontal armour

@phased-arraych.9150 Жыл бұрын

I expected the composite array to be impervious. I was wrong.

@yarikpetrenko Жыл бұрын

As Composite Armor I can confirm this is true

@user-mf6mm7rg5r Жыл бұрын

Looks some strange, the area of first plate damage and deformation was big, but in the second plate it was more "dot". "Deformation run through material" always with angle, and area of deformation on the back side should be bigger than at the front side of plate.

@dejmianxyzsimulations4174 Жыл бұрын

There is no material continuity. The second plate does not deform, only the shock wave passing through the material pushed it enough that it broke.

@cloudtail Жыл бұрын

Holy based

@corrodan2995 Жыл бұрын

Still a significant emotional event and I wonder how subsequent hits would damage

@Bialy_1 Жыл бұрын

Just wonder why the HESH round flies in a straight line and not in a parabola... i wonder why was so much effort put in that this missile could flatten itself on the armor only to detonate it halfway through this deformation ... And what is wrong with pressure in this simulation that it was not even able to significantly lower the velocity of that bottom cap....

@corrodan2995 Жыл бұрын

@@Bialy_1 The force is purely directional, so that cap most likely would not be impacted to a noticeable degree. The detonation is to keep integrity of the casing, there is only so much deformation the shell can withstand and still effectively impart directed energy. If the integrity fails it will not detonate properly. So it deforms partially to the surfaces angle, then detonates.

@Sunshrine2 Жыл бұрын

Where is the witness plate? :P

@RYNOCIRATOR_V5 11 ай бұрын

do 183mm HESH please

@tasman006 Жыл бұрын

Was that 105mm L7 guns Hesh or 120mm L11 or L30 guns HESH.

@dejmianxyzsimulations4174 Жыл бұрын

155mm T152

@MythicPi Жыл бұрын

I've been wondering if you could do a simulation of APFSDS vs Duplet ERA from Ukraine?

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

The single layer version fail to compute due to exponential increase in solution time.

@chadbergeron9135 Жыл бұрын

How about 7.62 or RPG 7 round hitting the titanium bathtub of a A-10 Warthog

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

The 2 you mentioned are very different thing. I don't know about 762, but US probably has test data you can read. Rpg7? Really? It is a 70mm he.

@chadbergeron9135 Жыл бұрын

I agree the 7.62 would be very ineffective against the titanium bathtub, but the very correlation of its usage and its Effectiveness in the current conflicts in which it is being used is why I have brought up the subject. Do you have any suggestions on the current munitions that would be used against the A-10 Warthog commonly? I still think it is fascinating subject and still has Merit as a subject for a short video.

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

@@chadbergeron9135 I don't think there are any a10 being actively deployed ATM. Is US involved in any active combat zone after Afghanistan? Stuff that would be used against a10 ranges from 22lr to pl-21. I do not think a10 would be facing any threat in the near future. It is going away. Unless US decided to invade places with no effective air defense again.

@Kakjung124 Жыл бұрын

imagine you using FV4005's HESH

@debugden9172 Жыл бұрын

Get this man a witness plate... STAT.

@hilton5pos Жыл бұрын

Was HESH designed for tanks or was it for fixed fortifications?

@dejmianxyzsimulations4174 Жыл бұрын

Pure anti tank weapon

@EdyAlbertoMSGT3 10 ай бұрын

I think HESH was meant for anti-fortification, but they did make the 183mm gun and it's HESH round specifically to penetrate armor

@MrChewy97 Жыл бұрын

183mm hesh next

@Justbecausewhy_not 4 ай бұрын

The driver wouldn’t be to ok with popped eardrums for the overpressure though…

@hartsymk1 Жыл бұрын

Just a quick question was spin applied to the round to simulate is coming from a rifled barrel? Apparently its necessary to allow for the hesh round to spread out appropriately, i know its super slowmo so it's hard to tell.

@jintsuubest9331 Жыл бұрын

He include spin whenever it is appropriate. That's why the damage is not perfectly symmetrical.

@professionalredneck7920 4 ай бұрын

Imagine an IS-7 or a Maus made out of composite armor.😳

@maksimer6612 2 ай бұрын

Абраша чиленджер это современное воплощение их!

@nicholascazmay2126 6 ай бұрын

Driver is probably alive but definitely just got some spalling to the face.

@XtreeM_FaiL Жыл бұрын

What 155mm canon shoots HESH?

@jackd1582 Жыл бұрын

A 6 inch one

@nephilimivritt8216 Жыл бұрын

our uranium darts from an M1A1 would cut threw their armor like a hot knife threw melted butter

@barbarapitenthusiast7103 Жыл бұрын

Realy? a round from 1988 which only entered service in 1991 can penetrate the hull armor from a tank from 1973? Amazing

@BlightCosmos Жыл бұрын

Id love to see a simulation for modern armor against ww2/ww1 rounds I know the modern armor will win but I want to know how GOOD modern armor is

@user-bj6ih8xi9m Жыл бұрын

Modern tanks are less armored tgan their ww2 counterparts so ww2 ammo can win

@user-bj6ih8xi9m Жыл бұрын

Modern stuff are less armored but more smartly armored

@dejmianxyzsimulations4174 Жыл бұрын

I've done Jagdtiger vs Abrams some time ago

@goats-are-awesome Жыл бұрын

FV 4005 vs T-10?

@akula9713 3 ай бұрын

The shock wave inside the vehicle would incapacitate the crew.