Glad to hear that

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Ungar

​@@antonioantonio9162 Romanian was your ass.

@@antonioantonio9162 I think his father was Serbian name Vlajko

Possibly. Hunyadi could have easily taken the crown after the kings death, if he was still alive. His son Matthias became a very powerful ruler, but his Balkan strategy was centered around defense, and he was chasing his own ambition to the west, to become Emperor instead. In some ways, the events during this video doomed Hungary in the long term though. With no major Ottoman campaigns to the north for decades after their defeat at Belgrade, and after Matthias's tyrannical, centralized rule, the nobles were more concerned with electing a weak king, so that they could do as they pleased. They could easily do this, because Matthias's only possible heir was a bastard. This severely weakened the kingdom after Matthias.

Haha its true Hunyadi defeated ottomans in some wars but he got his ass beaten in varna 1444 & second Kosovo 1448 these were full scale wars. He was not enough to stop ottomans go n suck your claim happily 😂😂😂.

@@chusmankahloon2143 For the Ottomans and the remaining Balkan countries those were full scale wars. For Hungary and the other major Christian powers they were nothing major. Hunyadi was the main drive behind those campaigns, and he did not have the resources of a country behind him. He basically had to scrape his army together, from anyone willing to support him. That is why the Ottomans outnumbered Hunyadi's coalition forces so heavily both times. After those defeats, pretty much nobody wanted to support an offensive again. Same thing happened to the Ottomans after Belgrade. It was a massive defeat. They were not going to try a major attack for decades. Hence why there was relative quiet on the Balkans in the following decades.

@@chusmankahloon2143 fortunatelly their own lack of culture and lack of capablity for peace stopped the ottomans from inside, like all the fire results in a burnout

Only united European campaign against Ottomans could end their expansion in Europe. But it didn't happen, at least not on necessary scale

Thank you for the encouragement, Ryan!

@@HoH this is the first time I hear that John Hunyadi killed Vlad Dracula it is simply not true

@@ioanpopa309 Daca l-ar fi ucis, atunci pe cine a ținut închis fiul sau Mattias I de Hunedoara, rege al Ungariei? Deci este o aberație istorica maghiara. La câte minciuni spun ei, acum s-au încurcat în ele.

Same here, in Romania! We have a castle of him named „Castelul Corvinilor- Hunedoara” wich is a very beautiful and renowned castle. His romanian name is Ioan de Hunedoara= Janos Hunyadi

@@mikeonly8554 He was Romanian.

@@predacorneliu He had wallachian roots on his father's side [his mother is unknown], but he didn't consider himself Romanian, he married a Hungarian nobless Erzsebet Szilagyi and became a champion for the Hungarian kingdom.

@@Hy-jg8ow Evidence about the Romanianness of Ioan / Iancu de Hunedoara: 1. Let's see what Enea Silvio Piccolomini (Pope Pius II) wrote about Transylvania and Wallachia in the chronicle Liber chronicarum (Nuremberg, 1493): "John of Hunedoara (Johannes Huniades), whose reputation darkens others, increased the glory of the Hungarians but of the others, the Romanians among whom he was born ". 2. Excerpts about Romanians and Iancu de Hunedoara in the chronicle of Antonio Bonfini (1434-1503): “He was born of a Romanian father (Valacho patre) and a Greek mother; by dexterity and virtue he honored his people above the expectations of all. It is said that his parents were not of obscure origin either. For his father - as they say - enjoyed great fame among the Romanians, who now rule the places of the Getae and Dacians and rightly believe in the remains of the Roman settlers, as evidenced by the resemblance of their language. Of course, he increased his authority not only through wisdom and long experience, but also through his riches and successes, being accustomed to incessant wars, through his military efforts he did not gain more wealth than fame. 3. Ferdinand I of Habsburg awarded a diploma on November 23, 1548, to Nicolaus Olahus, Chancellor of Hungary, in which he wrote: as it is known, they are the descendants of the Romans .... Your people are excellent in heroism, a great number of warriors like Ioan Huniade and King Matei have come out of its bosom ". This diploma was published in 1879 by the Hungarian historian Pal Hunfalvy. 4. Sandor Domanovszky, a university professor at the University of Budapest, said of the Hunedoara family that they were "Transylvanian Romanians". 5.The Greek chronicler Critobul of Imbros recorded in his paper entitled During the reign of Muhammad II, 1451-1467, that the famous Ottoman sultan, conqueror of Constantinople, considered that the Byzantine emperor "incited against us (the Turks)" John together with his family. peons (Hungarians) and Dacians (Romanians) ”. Critobul of Imbros, (From the reign of Muhammad II, 1451-1467). 6.If he was a Magyar, then why should Iancu continue the negotiations to bring Vladislav, a Pole, to the throne of Hungary and he does not take the throne of Hungary! The Pole accepts the throne on March 6 and, despite the desperate attempts of the Queen of Hungary's party, arrives in Buda on May 21 and actually settles on the Hungarian throne. But the political rift between the two camps degenerated into a civil war. Iancu, on the side of Vladislav the Pole, led the king's army against the great nobles, whom he decisively defeated at Battaszek on September 10, 1440, and installed him as king. If he was a Magyar, why didn't he want the throne, and if he was the son of Sigismund of Luxembourg, why didn't he ask for his father's throne? Simple because don't have nothing to do with Hungary and the Magyars and was not and had nothing to do with Sigismund of Luxembourg.

@@predacorneliu LOL, in that era the modern concept of nationality didn't matter. He became part of the Hungarian nobility, he married a hungarian noble woman, and became a celebrated hero of that kingdom. No amount of mental gymnastics will make him historically a romanian fighting for romanian goals. He was the governor of the kingdom of Hungary, his son, now even more hungarian since his mother was hungarian, became king of Hungary not king of Romania. Try again with your gish galloping, it doesn't amount to nothing. Literally! In conclusion, him being of wallachiam extraction doesn't make him a romanian historical figure. He was Hungarian for all practical purposes, just like Basarab, the cuman was romanian for all practical purposes. As for why he weighed in on a Polish king's succession that was simply dynastic politics, kings were rarely exclusively from the nation they ruled. Poland itself had several Hungarian kings and queens, from Louis the Great through Hedwig to Bathory Istvan. It was dynastic cross-polination.

Baiazid fulgeru....ce va mai place sa aberati,

we protect your independence🇭🇺❤🇽🇰

Kosovo Albania

Just wait until your American masters abandon you, you will have to flee across Adriatic sea.

@@user-gh8nk4ym7r poor serbian you Wish to join Sea coast, Is enoug there Danubio acros serbia

@@user-gh8nk4ym7r If their American masters abandon them, still there was the whole islamic world, like Turkey, or Egypt.... Even if Russia helps you, there was no guarantee for victory.

Hello there

@@obi-wankenobi1676 general kenobi!

@@gergelylaszlo5463 tudom merész vagyok nem egyszer mondták már

Hehe, magyar Star Wars fanok, gyülekező

Yes. But he was romanian 😄 Iancu de Hunedoara his real name

Possibly!

That would be amazing

Hi Subham, thank you for the kind words. I just recorded it - should be up in two weeks as editing these videos take a bit.

@@HoH Thanks a lot my friend. Your channel is my favourite. I will never forget you

Kosovo Albania 🇦🇱 🇭🇺💟

As a matter of fact, I am reading a book about him right now!

Thank you Marshal!

But what did you learn about the history of these places?

@@predacorneliu mostly in america we mainly learn about our own history and ancient history like Greece and Egypt.

@@knightspearhead5718 So this area is not studied! I understand! Yes, we also learned about the great civilizations of Egypt and Greece.

@@knightspearhead5718 Ah yeah ,like 95 percent of the world do not existed! :-D Un approved!

But he isn't a magyar.

@@predacorneliu He is a hero for the Hungarians that is actually enough. He was also a underling of the Hungarian king and fought for Hungary. He grew up in Hungary too! According to the ideas of the time, that made him a Hungarian. But a compromise would be to call him a Romanian-Hungarian hero.

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars history and truth is not question of compromise. Hunyadi was Hungarian, not Romanian. It is said by clever Romanians as well. Only typical Romanians are lying all the time...

​@@csemanattila7133 You are obviously a Hungarian and every Hungarian knows that Poles consider themselves friends of Hungarians. As a friend, I would advise you not to judge so harshly. Just because a Romanian has a different opinion on this does not mean that he should be insulted as a liar. Hungarians and Romanians should be on friendly terms with each other and simply accept that there are different opinions about János Hunyadi. Believe me, if the EU dooms due to the civil wars in various EU states as a result of the struggles for supremacy between the Orientals and the natives, which will probably start when will be there about 30% of Oriental population. Maybe even earlier. Then the states without civil wars such as Hungary, Romania, Poland and the others who were sensible and did not allow such migrants into the country dependent on friendly relationships with one another. Because these various civil wars will also have an impact on these states. So it is better to be on friendly terms with certain nations despite different views my friend. In any case, a thumbs up for you, because for Poles this is a matter of course with regard to Hungarians. :)

@@csemanattila7133 But it is not the Romanians who claim to be Romanian, but the following: Pope Pius II, Frederick III of Austria, Bonfini and even Magyar historians. Then his sister marries the voivode of Wallachia and the future regent of Hungary, Nicolaus Olahus, is born, who states that both he and his family are Romanians. So before you make statements you better study history and not propaganda. The daughter of his wife's brother, Elisabeta Silaghi, marries Vlad Tepes, the ruler of Wallachia. So we can say that he was a Romanian nobleman from Transylvania, who led the Hungarian army and state.

I used to call Hyundai as Hunyadi! Pretty obvious! Un approved!

János Hunyadi was a Hungarian hero and a friend of the Poles like many Hungarians! Always thumbs up for Hungarian heroes from Poland!

@@antonioantonio9162 How could Matthias be half Romanian if his father was only half Romanian you may want to take a maths class even though that's not how genetics or culture work. Anyway, he couldn't be a hero of a crown that he abused that being the Wallachian and worked tirelessly to further the aims of the Hungarian kingdom what does that tell you.

Hunyadi & Gjergj Kastrioti Scanderbeg They Saved Europe From Ottomans.

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars "János Hunyadi" (his name was Ioan) was in reality a Romanian and his family was from Wallachia.

@@aiziszizis2536 Anyway he is also a hero for the Hungarians. But actually a hero for all Europeans!

There are 4 theories as to its origin, and the most likely is kun (cuman). If the Romanian state did not forbid foreign historians and researchers to investigate in Romania, many things would be revealed.

@@zs8348 John Hunyadi's father's name was Voyk (Voicu in Romanian). Voyk is not a Cuman name, it's a Slavic name. Slavs and Vlachs lived together since the 6th century in today Romania. The Romanian language was also influenced by Church Slavonic. So the whole Cuman origin of Voyk is a straight up lie told by Hungarians because they hate Romanians and see us as inferior and they're ashamed to admit their hero, John Hunyadi was a Vlach, and not a Cuman.

@@RhiannonSenpai we are still waiting for the results of the researching. Until there is everything just theory. Hunyadi fought for the Roman Christianity and not for ortodoxian,and he considered himself as a hungarian.Descent is after that only secondary thing.

@@zs8348 That's because Voyk/Voicu, John Hunyadi's father took his family or had his family in the Kingdom of Hungary. In order for John Hunyadi to get into Hungarian nobilty, he had to marry a Hungarian woman, in order to marry a Hungarian noble you had to convert from Orthodoxy to Catholicism, that's what Vlad Țepeș did. He used to be Christian Orthodox and his second maariage he converted to Catholicism in order to marry a Hungarian noblewoman and gain favour, what's so hard to understand?

​@@RhiannonSenpaiVajk is a cuman name/ during that period vlachs havent even migrated to Wallachia, it was mostly inhabited by cumans tatars and other nomadic descent people

Many thanks!

@@HoH welcome brother you deserve my admiration

I am not much of a gamer, but I looked up some clips and the game looks very good!

Video games are for lazy people

Thank you! It takes quite a bit of time to edit these videos, and I thought between 12-16 minutes was a decent length for the average viewer. What makes you think longer videos will receive more traction?

@@HoH Check out this video by Sunnyv2. I think he explains it better than I would have. :) kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p95zY6mTz5e8iqs.html

Much appreciated. One of my upcoming videos is indeed about Skanderbeg!

Really enjoy it 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺

he's good but not the best

T

Yes, and Jan Jiskra z Brandýsa the creator of the Slovak nation.

@@xerxen100 Yeah, Czech :-D . Its bollocks to be apart, we are one. Czechs and Slovaks.

@@Retarior Yes, slovaks are emigrants from Czechia.

" both battle of Varna and battle of nicopolis had more or less equal sized troops" absolutelly no. The Ottomans always have much bigger armies, but the hungarians always have more heavy soldiers than Ottomans.

Romania didn't even exist these days xd He is and will be hungarian

@@GermaniaHunnia His family roots were wallachian (and it is mentioned in this video) so that's why it is in our history books. Wallachian and Moldova were at that time and at war constanly within each other employing mercenaries like Turks, tatars, cazaks, poles.

@@valley6824 He organized the defense of fortress of Belgrad and push the assault of the ottomans and in an encyclopedia that i have called "Illustrated History of the world" , he is included in a page named Serbian Kingdoms.

Ja, román család. A Vajk tipikis román név... Egyébként (vélhetően, legalábbis a történészek ezt állítják) Kolozsváron született, és akkor a tíz ujjad is elég lett volna, hogy összeszámold az ott található románokat. Amúgy a vicces, hogy abban az időszakban a havaslaföldőn még meglepően sok magyar élt.

@@reywind8895 Where did you get this nonsense?

János Hunyadi was a Hungarian hero and a friend of the Poles like many Hungarians! Always thumbs up for Hungarian heroes from Poland!

@@GreatPolishWingedHussars That's good!

@@dorka9639 My pleasure!

There were not many princes, barons or lords who were not power hungry (and not only in Hungary).

His last surviving grandnephew was literally called Nicolaus Olahus... The Pope wrote about him being Romanian. This can go on and on, Hungarians will refuse to see the truth.

@@Zullyan According to your logic, Richard the Lionheart was a French celeb not an English King. Churchill a half American politician and not an English statesman. Or Ibrahim the deputy of Suleyman was an Albanian guy etc. etc. Pls understand, it plays not a role, had Hunyadi one or more oláh anchestor or not. Nobody intrested in it but you. Hunyadi was representant of the Hungarian Kingdom, he was Hungarian noble man. He led a Hungarian army. He was Chancellor of Hungary. Your arguments only demonstrate the Romanian minority feeling, since you still go back and back, who was the grandfather of Hunyadi. Who cares?

@@nakibela8768 Just because someone lived in a medieval entity called Regnum Hungarorum, doesn't mean they were ethnically Hungarian. Your own logic beats you bro...

@@Zullyan romania didn't exist that time

@@ggggg895hungary Neither did Hungary, feudal entities based on dynasties, marriages and feudal contracts are not exactly modern states...

proud of the cowardice of the Hungarians like any fool :))

​@@cicoalexx battle of bucharest 1916 xd

Magyars

John Hunyadi was romanian as origins

@@mirceapascalau there is 4 possibly origin of him.for romanians is sure (like always) he was romanian😂

Vlad Tepes was ortodox.

and Janos killed Tepes father , good neighbors he ?.. yeah they allied against Ottomans, but only when the danger was to great. In the rest of the time Dracul family didn't pay their obligations to the Hungarian kingdom , so it was a constant struggle and internal fights among Wallachians and Hungarians,.. Later on, Matyas imprisoned Tepes for the same reasons and the family feud going on for generations

@@zoltanercei1094 Why did Vlad Dracul's family have to pay something to the Kingdom of Hungary? What obligations are you talking about?

@@predacorneliu Walachia was a vassal of Hungary before the Ottomans. Once the ottomans started to attack more and more in Europe then Walachia changed sides many times, until Hungary was defeated in 1526.Since then Walachia remained under Ottoman rule...Same actually with Moldova, but there was a complication with Poland, Hungary and Ottomans until the Russians come close and Hungary and Poland was defeated.

@@zoltanercei1094 Following the battle of 1330, Wallachia became independent from the political domination of the Kingdom of Hungary. Vlad Țepeș ruled in Wallachia in 1448, 1456-1462 and 1476, so we are over 150 years old when Hungary was eliminated from Wallachia, so what you say is either stupid or you don't know history.Walahia did not change any part and pursued his own interest. If Wallachia changed sides, then what can we say about the Magyars who besieged the Turks and their brothers in Vienna? As only on the crown of Hungary it is written: Bela I, the king of the Turks, on the old maps Hungary was written Turkey, and the Magyars were called Turks, and 5 days ago Hungary joined the union of the Turkish countries

Where were those neighbors when Serbs needed help against Ottomans? You are such a hypocrite.

@@user-gh8nk4ym7r Serbias king was the Hungarian king, until you rebell against him, when he was on crusade in the middle east. After your "tsar" who is aktually the king of Serbs, Arbanians, and the empereor of Epirus fucked the things up with all of his neighbours, and even with epirus and Albania....

@@user-gh8nk4ym7r Ok, but the hungarians were not attack back you. On the other hand you did it the battle of Nicopoly and the second Kosovo/va battle. This is the difference. You fought together with ottoman empire the ankara battle (the serbian cavalary saved the ottoman princess) . And you made an alliance contract with them after the Hungarians rejected them. Then the "rumalian" army consisted mostly of Serbs and so did the Janissary. This is the fact.

It was just the opposite. It was Hungary that attacked and betrayed Serbia after the battles in Kosovo, so vile when Serbia was significantly weakened. The situation in that period was very unfavorable for Serbia because it was attacked by both Hungary and the Ottomans. Brankovic understood the political situation at the time well and tried to save Serbia and his people in the best possible way with his maneuvers. By the way, Janos Hunjadi was of Serbian origin by his father side. In the document, King Sigismund of Hungary bestowed Hunyad Castle (in present-day Hunedoara, Romania) and the lands attached to it upon John's father, Voyk and Voyk's four kinsmen, including John himself. In that document it is mentioned that Voyk (John's father) was son of Serb. The Hungarian historian Janos Karaconji also represents Janos' Serbian origin in his book. Hunyadi died in Belgrade.

@@amarillorose7810 Hunyadi died in Nándorfehérvár, its later renamed Belgrade. But it doesent matter. Hunyady Serbian? Its better for you to discuss with the Romanians. Brankovic was an asshole. His only success is the 500 years occupation of Serbia... " It was Hungary that attacked and betrayed Serbia" Yes, it was Hungary, who attacked first, but they have the reason. They no can betray a traitor...

They (Hunyadi+ Skanderbeg) together almost changed the history... The heroes are living forever..

@@ferim.4186 That's right Brother.

@@albionrovers6018 Thanks and Kosova is Albania..

@@ferim.4186 Kosovo is Serbia

János Hunyadi was a Hungarian hero and a friend of the Poles like many Hungarians! Always thumbs up for Hungarian heroes from Poland!

No they are hungarian. The Vajk tipical uralaltaian first name. The first christian king of hungarian (István/steave) original name is also Vajk..😉 i am happy to help you..😉

Every country what take the roman catholic religious use the latin language the official letters like the cross letter. I am happy to help you again.

@@ferim.4186 Do you believe us when he mentioned that he was of Magyar origin? All the chronicles and chroniclers, not to mention the Pope of Rome, the ruler of Austria, Bonfini said that he was of Romanian origin, and his father, Voicu, was born and came from Wallachia. I am happy to help you, because you don't know nothing about history.

@@predacorneliu But Bonfini wasn' t wrote Vajk was wallachian or romani..😉

@@predacorneliu No I claim hunyadi jános was father's line cuman/mongol origin and his mother's line hungarian, what is the fact.

John Hunyady is part of Hungarian history, but that does not change the fact that he was of Romanian origin....Even Nicolaus olahus, John Hunyady's grandson, wrote in his biography that his grandmother, John Hunyady's sister, was Romanian from Wallachia.

They got destroyed by Ottomans😂

None are my native language, it is bound to happen.

is this a joke ? he is a greek hero

@@ARYANSES 😑

Glad you enjoyed it!

From internal sources, researchers can tell you that certain data about their origin will not be published, because they have clearly shown that they are of Romanian origin. About Basarab I to say that he is a Cuman, is an aberration because the king of Hungary himself according to an official document issued in 1332 by the king of Hungary Carol Robert d'Anjou who, after the Battle of Posada in November 1330, rewarded the Laurentius counties of Zarand for his bravery in that battle. The text of that diploma contains the mention "Basarab, filium Thocomerii, scismaticum, infidelis Olahus Nostris", so it does not say that it is Cuman or Mongol but on the contrary it clearly writes Olahus = Romanian and Scismaticum = Orthodox. I don't think you can doubt, you a magyar, what your king writes, especially since he knew Basarab and you don't even know who you are, but to know that Basarab I was a Cuman. Including the paintings in the chronicle that describe the battle between the king of Hungary and the voivode Basarab I, where the Magyars were defeated, show us their clothes and their clothes as belonging to the Romanians and not to the Cumans. So just that he had a possible name of Cumanian or foreign origin does not prove anything, how many examples we have with people called Ungureanu or Roman but they are neither magyars nor Romans.

@@predacorneliu I was sure that you will comment to me. Mr Préda which abusively used the Romanian flag and map as his avatar, like somebody wanting to demonstrate that he is something what he is not! Those Romanians, Hungarians, English, etc., who are obsessed by their colors, map, flag, etc., usually they are allogens, who want in this way to demonstrate that they belong to that nation, because many people sense that they are not what they claim to be. It seems that where I comment, you respond too to me. You are tracking somehow my comments? It is funny, you know? You became like a companion dog to me. So you are so dogmatic, you want so hard to demonstrate to your Romanians, that you are not an allogen, that you have to comment under every video which is about the Hungarians, and to write your racist lines here, that the Hungarians in fact are not Hungarians... You seem that you even do not believe to your own few normal historians like Neagu Djuvara, who wrote a book about the Mongol-Cuman origin of Basar Aba. You only believe what you want to. Never to the facts. If the nationalist Romanian historians would have nothing to fear, why they did not allowed archeogenetic researches to be made on Basarab's bones? This shows that they know the truth, but they do not want it to be revealed, because they are so racist, that they want to show the Romanians as a "clean, Superior race" which blood was never mixed with other races, especially not with Hungarians, Mongolians or Turks, which they consider inferior races. So you show your real identity here. Mr. Préda (a Hungarian name), you think that you are living in the 40's Germany? The Hungarian scientists are not affraid of making genetic researches about the origins of the Hungarians, their rulers and great personalities . On the other hand, the Romanians are affraid, because they sense, that if they research, something unpleasant can come out. And what you show here that Basar Aba was named Valachian, this shows only the name of the country he founded, based on the national majority of the population he ruled. And what is about he being an Orthodox? A Cuman with Mongolian origins could not convert to Orthodoxy? It is excluded that a Turk or Mongolian to become Orthodox? You know the Gagauz Turks and like half of the Buryat Mongols are Orthodox Christians... So your arguments are funny to me.

@mjkvsufv Erről szóltak annak idején cikkek. Nem tudok mindent lejegyezni. Áder nagyon jól tette, most mindegy, hogy összehasonlítható-e a kettő, vagy nem, de folyton beszélni kell róla, hogy a világ megismerje ezt a történelemben páratlan igazságtalanságot. Szerintem túl keveset beszélnek és írnak róla.

@@szalard I didn't know that you have a problem and that you feel followed, I honestly don't write down when and where to comment, and I don't remember these data, which I see you do. Now to analyze the avatar or why I chose it is too much for me and I will not do it. I thought that a comment on the subject did not bother anyone, but I noticed that the worst are bothered magyars friends, who can not accept any contradiction or other arguments. Never, but never contradict a magyar. But I have to do it, so stay calm, things don't end here. Although you wrote that my arguments are funny, it doesn't seem like much and I don't think you proved that to be the case, it's still a while until you go crazy and start with the characteristic nicknames, which show you the level of education.

@mjkvsufv When you see so much stupidity, especially with you, you can't have an inferiority complex. Regarding your president, everyone was impressed by how stupid a man can say. From my information, Ader received the text directly from Putin. Maybe a bit of history at least about Crimea, it wouldn't hurt, but Ader doesn't seem to know, that's yours, and I can't even make any claims about you.

Sorry for you. He was Wallachian, with Wallachian blood. He became Hungary's king.

@@ilucian2792 Hunyadi János was a governor, not king. His son will be a king.

@@ilucian2792 And his father from Wallachia, his mother was erzsébet morzsinái szeklerhungarian noble lady.

@@ilucian2792 If he comes from Walachia, theres still almost certain that he was Cuman, or Pechenges, because Walachian nobility at the time was Cuman or Byzantine, none of them was Wlach.

@@xerxen100 I see you are very concerned about Wallachian nobility! But what about the "Hungarian" nobility? Your Stephen the Holy is supposed was Wallachian too. One of the royal "Hungarian" family was French (d'Anjou), etc.

I am currently working on a video about Skanderbeg! Perhaps one about Vlad Dracul will be fitting after that...

@@HoH i cannot wait. You know he was half serb half byzantine. His flag was the military flag of byzantium that is now the albanian national flag

@@theodorossarafis7370 @House of History That is 100% false. Skanderbeg is the name ottomans gave to Gjergj Kastrioti. He was born in the principal of Kastrioti in Albania, both Albanian parents and he died Albanian. He was the last crusader (christian) standing against Ottoman Empire after Janos Hunyadi died.

@@LuckyLupen he was born in albania. In the byzantine empire he was a despot a title given to greeks. His mother was officially serbian. Plus the term albanian was created much later. Also his last name kastrioti is greek which derives from the ancient greek kastro which means castle.

@Mutant Pig according to german archives ss division hunjadi was from hungarians. Yes there were also volksdeutsche but the majority was hungarians

Learn history!

@@predacorneliu The question was not for you...🙂

@@TheGuideBv

Walachian*

@@FLS.X2 No, still Hungarian. Like his country, his people, his army and the flags under which he fought.

is not jhon it is Iancu ok

@@iulykenoby6058 Iancu de Hunedoara

No, he hadn't common to romani..

Janos Hunyadi from transilvania Hungary. Hunyadvar means castle of Hunyad . That Romanian version doesn't mean anything so clear that transylvania is a hungarian land overflow with rumanian migrants as all of Europe

transilvania not romania in that time

The date from the chronicles...and every chronicles are exaggerated.

Why do you think this was a huge victory :D? Because its a fucking huge army. Yes, the 150 000 shows the power of the Ottoman empire.

He is apreciate by the both side an is in our history books but not so much like voievods from Moldova or Walahia

Romania, in the middle age? Where exactly was Romania? Could you show it on the map?

@@IKL111 Moldavia, Walahia were states occupied by Romanians, but they were not unified under the name of Romania Transilvania was also populated mostly by Romanians

@@IKL111 ok, I se a Hungary on that map, and today I see Romania on that map! what nationality is Iancu Hunyad now?

@@sory312 Now? He is dead for 600 years. XD but...Do you know what? I will play your little game. Then tell me about the first romanian king, what nationality he had? and what was his religion? just remind you. The nationalism was not exist in the middle age but the new age.

Where did you get this nonsense?

„Ami az adatokból nyilvánvaló: a Hunyadi-család román eredetű volt. Erre utalnak az általuk használt keresztnevek, de először a későbbi kormányzót is Hunyadi Oláh Jánosnak hívták, később pedig külföldön „Walachia fehér lovagja” néven emlegették. Származásáról nincs kétség, noha mindig akadtak, akik ezt kétségbe vonták. Az azonban már bizonytalan, hogy Serbe fia Vajk milyen társadalmi rétegből és honnan jött.” - Kubinyi András: Mátyás király. Vince kiadó, 2001. Tudomány - Egyetem sorozat

@@ionbrad6753 Én azért még várnék 50-60 évet, addigra kiderül, hogy mi az igazság. Ez az egész bűzlik a román nacionalista befolyástól. Egy kezeden megszámolhatod, hogy mennyi román névtelen kapott nemesi rangot, és abból mennyi lett király. Ez kb olyan, mintha a Hunyadiak 2x egymás után megnyerték volna az eurojackpotot. Viszont kapsz egy 5-öst, mert remekül felmondtad a román történelemkönyvet.

@@reywind8895 A Romanian king who ruled Hungary is also Mattias I of Hunedoara, and a regent of Hungary is also Nicolaus Olahus. Then we don't have many kings of Magyar origin who ruled Hungary, we can say that along with the Romanians there were Poles, Austrians, Germans, Italians and to take at least a 4th pass, you name it. Why wait 50 years when they wrote about the nationality of Pope Pius II of Rome, Frederock of Austria, Bonfini and a few Magyar historians.

@@predacorneliu what the hell are you talking about xd he says romanian king who ruled hungary Rumunia were never a kingdom in the medieval times, it means they never had kings from their own that time lol. Wallachia were a little state's ruled by vojvods never kings. It is obvious that you live in your Fantasy, Hungary raised the Hunyadis they, did not come from the Rumun history Stop stealing our history romani boy pls, you are ridiculous

Ultimately, it doesn't matter. He was doing good work for God and the entire Balkans, resisting the Ottomans. A pity he decided to break a sworn treaty, though... God may've let him win if not for that.

From the writings of Pope Pius II, Frederick of Austria, the leader of Austria, Bonfini, its origin was Romanian. There was no evidence of his connection with Sigismund, neither he, nor his mother, nor his son Mattias I of Hunedoara knew about such a thing, so it is strange that no one, at that time, knew that he was of Romanian origin. So can you show me or point me to a document or a chronicler from that time that says about him that he is Hungarian, Serbian, or something else?

@@predacorneliu To make things clear, I will be speaking of his ethnic origins. Before I made my first comment, I read people claiming that he was of Hungarian, Romanian, or Serbian descents. So I started to read about it. And I also read your other comments under this video, because I suspected that you would write to a lot of people, so I could understand your point of view better. If you want to, we can talk about his identity later, but now you asked about his origins. The first thing, is that his mother was Hungarian and at least her closest ancestors lived in Hungary too. Bonfini tells that she had Greek origins but later he wrote that she was of Roman heritage. He wrote about (let's call him John so that it does not sound biased ; ) ) when he was dead, most of his stories on Matthias were fairy tales to make him look good. That's all about Bonfini's credibility. If John's mother being Hungarian is true, that would make John half Hungarian, if we -as usual- don't count the minor mixes. I'm also sceptic about the pope's and Frederick's views, as they were far from knowing John and the history of this region, I'm afraid that their 'researches' were superficial. And please don't take offence, but they couldn't refer to him as Romanian, but rather Wallachian, but yes these references were made. The question is that do these statements have truth. Now regarding his father, or his father's origins. One possibility is that John was not the son of Vajk/Vaicu/Woyk but Siegesmund. Yes, there is no evidence, but what is the evidence that Woyk was his father? What is enough as evidence? There is no direct evidence that who I call father is my father, only if we do a DNA test, which, looking at our subjects is impossible, so there is no direct evidence about John's father. It's possible that Siegesmund was his father, because John grew in ranks very rapidly despite his low descents, and instead of the king's own wife and daughter, he took John to his imperial coronation. And John had a brother also named John. This naming was only usual if the two were from different fathers. Huniad was given to Woyk so that he wouldn't tell anyone about Siegesmund's side-step. The King gave John to Pipo of Ozora(or whatever) to be taught by him, who was one of his most trusted confidential man. Of course this is one theory. If Woyk was his father, then, in the time the the nobility of let's say Wallachia were mostly Kuns/Kumans/Cumans. That is supported by his name, Woyk, which is of ancient Turkic descent. That was also the original name of Hungary's first King. That's the Kuman theory. I didn't find so much things about his Serbian descents, but it is mostly about that in the beginning, John was serving a high ranking man Lazarevich, and John was called Yanko Sibinyan or something like that. Very interestingly, János Arany, who is one of the greatest Hungarian patriotic poet supported this theory. So it may have deeper roots than what was available for me to find. Another theory states that John was the son of a Hungarian noble, namely Péter Vereb, which is supported by 'certificates' and the coat of arms with the same Raven. This bird is also found on the coat of arms of a priest order, with wich both the Vereb and the Huniad family had good relations. Now what certificates are they referring to, I couldn't find. And finally, it's completely possible, that Woyk was Wallachian or Romanian as we call it today, based on these foreign chronicles you mentioned and his father's geographical situation despite John himself being born in Kolozsvár/now Cluj Napoca. To make a conclusion, each theories are possible and acceptable to me, and at the same time none has enough evidence to convince me. It's up to you to decide which one do you believe, and I won't judge you for that. About you, seeing your comments, it was clear that you aren't brainwashed and you are seeking the information and being ready to recieve it. Although it also came through, that you are not completely unbiased as you only write Romanianized ways of names or saying Romanian instead of Wallachian, which would rather fit the context. However your message is clear. I don't judge you for your bias, because it's visible that you didn't have all the sources and the complete knowledge, and that you are quite nationalistic or patriotic at least. That's good, love your country. I don't have complete knowledge either. It would be stupid to suppose it otherwise. And one more thing:Transylvania was an independent principality only from 1526 to 1699. So if you said, that Transylvania was politically over Hungary under the regency of John, that's false. The Transylvanian vajda/ prince was a placeholder to the Hungarian king to whom John owed loyalty. And is your view on leaders of countries' correct? Did Hungary or others really serve John or was it the other way around? Only a tyrant makes his country serve him, instead of being a good leader becoming the first servant of the country. He's a hero not a tyrant. What do you think? Was this helpful? Any more questions?

@@p.b.5107 I admit that I went through your comment and I did not find anything new compared to Magyars propaganda, otherwise I can't name it, because there are all kinds of aberrant arguments that do not have a historical value so that it does not appear to be Romanian. Everything is tried, from the Cumans, to the Serbs, to the Croats, to Sigismund, anything can be invented only not to say that he was Romanian. I am surprised to find that there is still a problem in knowing that Wallachian or Romanian is the same thing, foreigners used this exonym to identify Romanians, but Romanians have never said anything other than Romanian . I jump directly to the end of your comment and answer the 3 questions, leaving aside the observations about my bias, or my nationalism, which are irrelevant, my only fault being that I am the only one who identifies with name, surname, flag and coat of arms as being Romanian, so I assume my identity, the rest not, so I can be attacked, but let's move on to the answers: What do you think? - I think your effort was great, to document yourself, but insufficient, you remained at a level of propaganda Was this helpful? - nothing for me, I knew all this, long before they answered, they are part of the propaganda that systematically bombards the internet with these elements that cover the truth. Other questions? - I don't have any questions for you, because you can't answer, you haven't read any books about history and the worst thing is that you issue uninformed opinions. Maybe you see who wrote this and what it can mean in solving the dilemma about his nationality: non tam Hungaris quam Valachis ex quibus natus erat gloriam auxit.

@@predacorneliu Is it ONLY containing Hungarian propaganda? I also listed his Wallachian/Romanian ancestry. And do you think the Serbian origin story is pushed by Hungarians? I didn't even hear about that before four days ago, and it was through some Serbs in this comment section. A part of these stories are based on little documentary, some are more probable but have no direct evidence either. Yes, some Hungarians would really like to evade John's Romanian origins. That's true. But personaly I think, that the Romanian story is one of the most reliable theories, and the Hungarian one is the least credible as that supposed father died 4 years before John's (estimated) birth. Even Hungarian historians and teachers support that a Romanian origin is quite possible. Not all of course. So Hungarians aren't all that narrow-minded : ) Sorry, I didn't want to offend you by naming Wallachia. I thought that an internationally accepted name would fit this international talk in this medieval context. If 'Wallachian is an exonym used by foreigners', then you can also look at this like I'm a foreigner too. It's sad that you are being attacked for your profile characteristics. I hope you didn't feel attacked by me, I tried to be friendly. Don't worry, there are lots of people with flags as profile pic and they too get attacked sometimes, you are not the only one. Did I remain at the level of 'propaganda' or was it only the stories? I just collected them and gave no credit to any. Be careful when you accuse, otherwise it would appear like as if you were the actually indoctrinated one, even if it's not the situation. Stamping propaganda on everything that stands against your beliefs makes you look the same as some dumb Hungarian extreme-nationalists. You don't want that, do you? You knew ALL this? I'm surprised. And I didn't read ANY history books? That souds really prejudgemental. Maybe not on this topic. But that's not true either. I know that you asked for information that is based on documents from that time. I have to surprise you, because all these theories are based on written or object form sources of that age. I won't list all together again, but John's mother, Siegesmund's strange acting, the three coats of arms, Lazarevich, the Cuman nobility are all from authentic written sources. Just like those chronicles and writings supporting Romanian origins, what I also listed. It's just that people base theories around the facts, luckily not the facts around the theories, which would end in bending truth at their will. The theories are theories, but the facts they were based on remain facts. So I did what you asked me for. If you can't accept the mere existence of these, then you don't seem that open any more. At your final argument with the archbishop's quote: even if John was really born from Wlachs/Romanians how would he raise the glory of them? Which nation did Napoleon Bonaparte raise the glory more? Corsica or France? Yes the Corsicans are proud of him af ever since, yet the French gained more from him than what they could ever pay back. Who fought at John's order? The army and the country fall without the leaders, but also what does a leader worth without something to lead? Both the leader and the ones being led gained glory. John's Romanian origins are widely accepted internationally too. I can accept his Romanian origins like many other people as it's one of the most supported theory by documents. But telling he was Romanian is a bit overexaggerated. There is a difference between someone being of Romanian origins and someone being Romanian. By the logic you use, the number of Hungarians would sky rocket in Transylvania, what you really wouldn't like to see. Independent international sources mention him as a Hungarian warlord of Romanian/Wallachian origins. This combination of "someone of this nation of that origin" is very common. But from what degree can we decide someone's allegiance to one people? If they are born from them? Born in their land? If they are 50%+ from their blood? Speak their language? If they stay among their own people? Or what they themselves call their homeland? It all depends on what people see as legitimate factors.

Thank you for the feedback Remko, it is still trial-and-error at this moment, trying out many new things.

@@duxromanorum9861 Siculi was in Transylvania before the Magyars for at least centuries. They mentioned in Gesta hungarorum. Their leader named Gyula(Gelou), and the Hungarians defeated them.

The genetic ancestry count, because peoples with weak talent no have very talented kids. And Hunyadi was not a mediocre stratega. His parents must be great persons too.

All you said is True i am romanian and The great warior Iancu de Hunedoara is burried in Alba Iulia catolic church

You're right. And here's one for you: Mathew Corvinus Vlad Dracula and Stefan the Great knew each other well where the last two were cousins and all three fought against each others. In what language they were communicating?

@@georgeborcean8564 According Krzystoff Warszewiecki (Polish historian of the 16th century), Matthew Corvinus was able to understand the Romanian language of the envoys of Stephen the Great of Moldova.

Albania is a friend with Turkey

@@Bogumilrum Hunyadi was Hungarian and Skanderbeg was Albanian. 🇭🇺🇦🇱

@@Bogumilrum True, he was not Mongoloid. He was Uralic, Hungarian.

@@Bogumilrum No.

Where does it come from that his mother was Hungarian?

@@predacorneliu It wasn't hungarian !

@@mugurstefan68 His mother was Romanian!

Sorry, but Hunyadi was a Hungarian noble man. He identified himself as Hungarian noble man. He fought with resources of Hungarian Kingdom. Its origin is not interesting. It is so easy. Wgat is the question?

@@nakibela8768 Where did he identify himself as a Magyar? He belong to Transilvania . Dude, take your idiotic propaganda from here.

Yeah

Hungarians started to attacking Serbia after battle of Kosovo but when Serbs needed help against Ottomans Hungarians were bitching how they don't have a army to send. Who needs enemies like Ottomans when you have a neighbor like Hungary.

@@duxromanorum9861 "you laugh at the Orthodox while you have a Eastern Roman crown and nearly adopted the faith yourselves." not nearly adopted, simply adopted. The problem with the Roman orthodox church is they even not Christians. Curse and fanatical nationalism is not Christianity.

@@user-gh8nk4ym7r Lol. They have reason to attack Serbia. You were just rebells. Your "tsar" was just a joke.

”the always running vlachs”? Hunyadi was a Vlach.

He was

Ez tiszta ostobaság!!!!!!!!!!!!!!PROPAGANDA amit ön állít.

Hunyadi János magyar hős volt és a lengyelek barátja, mint sok magyar! Mindig fel a hüvelykujj Lengyelországból magyar hősökért! János Hunyadi was a Hungarian hero and a friend of the Poles like many Hungarians! Always thumbs up for Hungarian heroes from Poland!

True, albanian brother.

But he was Romanian. He has nothing to do with the Magyars, his family and all his people were noble Romanians from Transylvania. He was the voivode of Transylvania and took over the army and the leadership of Hungary, because he was the strongest and richest, and Hungary had no leader of Magyar origin capable of anything.

@@ferim.4186 True, said the fool!

@@predacorneliu No he was hungarian.

@@predacorneliu And not accident, he was hungarian leader, not the subhumans..☺

He was from the hungarian royal family, stop the bullshit

The acheogenetic results were published and the Hunyadi family had nothing to do with the Romanians, their ancestors did not come from Wallachia!

@@szakaattila7899 Hunedoara is in Wallachia , "they didn't come from Wallachia".I bet it bothers you alot that the word vlah is all over the Hunyadi family wiki page , the John Hunyadi page and so on.Maybe you should show them your archeological publish and correct them.

@@BuddhaOwl Are you crazy or just born this way? In reality, the county of Hunyad was never a Romanian territory until 1919, it was called Huniad by the medieval Hungarians, as it means "where the sun sets" in Hungarian, and it has always been an ancient Hungarian-founded county and city of Transylvania, and nothing it has to do with Wallachia!

@@BuddhaOwl You are indoctrinated to the maximum with the phantasmagorical stories about "Daco-Romanians" and with the "continuity theory", with which all Romanians were tricked as small children, only to feel at home on a land with a totally foreign culture! Transylvania was originally Erdőelve, an ancient Hungarian word, which only in Hungarian means beyond the forests, which is where the Latin translation Transylvania comes from! Likewise, Banat comes from the Hungarian name Bánság, or Crişana comes from Körösvidék and Maramureș from Máramaros! All have names explained only from the Hungarian and Proto-Hungarian language, which have always been the ancient land of the Ugorian Scythians and the Magors - the Magyars, on which neither the Persians, nor the Macedonians with the Greeks, nor the Romans, nor the Pechenegs and Cumans, nor the Tatars and Mongols, nor the Turks - the Ottomans could ever completely conquer them! Even the Franco-Bavarian coalition of the Middle Ages could never defeat the Ugric and Magoric Scythians, but the later Austrians could never conquer or assimilate us in the end, not even the Russians and Soviets could never this! And where are these "great powers" or "empires" now?! Think carefully, because such prophecies have existed for many centuries, only you do not know about them, that in the end all those who attacked us and wanted to destroy us will suffer and perish, not for nothing the Hungarians and they have always entrusted the country to God and the Mother of God! Do you think it's all a coincidence? The results of the archaeogeneticists have clearly shown that the Hungarians of today come from the population of the large cemeteries of the Ugorian-Szeklers, who were much more numerous than was believed until now, and from whom we also inherited the language called Hungarian today, which was also spoken at the time of the Dacians, the Sarmatians, the Huns and the Avars! It has also been proven archaeologically from the thousands of excavations that Hungarian warriors with specific artifacts in their graves, were scattered in very small groups, throughout the Carpathian Basin and outside, but in some cases, close to them or next to them were the cemeteries with ten times larger of the autochthonous population of the Hungarians and Szeklers, with whom they had no armed conflicts at all, because no traces of conflicts were discovered anywhere, neither in the archaeological data, nor in the contemporary accounts! And about the migration of the Romanians, we have all the data that prove how the first Wallachian princes were received and settled on the royal lands of Hungary in Southern Transylvania, in Făgăraş and Haţeg. I think that many Romanians have no idea that the name Făgăraş comes from the proto-Hungarian word Fog - Fogas - Fogaras, as well as Haţeg from the Hungarian word Hátszeg, which have meaning in Hungarian, but mean absolutely nothing in Romanian! And according to all the real data that exists in the archives, linguists specializing in toponyms agree that there were no names of settlements or geographical names of Wallachian - Romanian origin before the 13th century in the Kingdom of Hungary, which included the entire Carpathian Basin! The Vlachs are mentioned for the first time only in the Byzantine chronicles of the 11th century, but the word Vlach in the written sources does not always refer to the ancestors of the Romanians. The idea is that in the second half of the Middle Ages, these groups of Vlachs were organized as if they were a people, but in some alliance with the Bulgarians, under the leadership of Petar and Ivan Asen, they participated in the war against the Empire Byzantine. Then, with the rise of the Bulgarians, in the second half of the 12th century, more and more people write about the Vlachs migrating north, who settled between the Danube and the Southern Carpathians, where it seems that the Cumans welcomed them with trust. Not even a hundred years pass, at the beginning of the 13th century, the Vlachs cross the Carpathians and the first Vlach Cneaz settles in Transylvania. And then, especially after the Tatar - Mongol devastation after 1241-42, the kings of Hungary give these princes the depopulated areas of southern Transylvania! The conclusion of established historians and linguists is that a larger population that settled somewhere for at least two or three centuries, had to leave traces of the names of settlements, rivers, streams, mountains and valleys somewhere. There is a document called "Regestrum Varadense" from the Kingdom of Hungary (the Varadean register) which contains 711 names of localities and about 2500 names of people, registered between the years 1205 and 1238, but no name or name of locality in this document has Romanian origins! But most of these names are from the Hungarian or proto-Hungarian language! And from all the contemporary data from Transylvania, in the 13th century only 3 names of Romanian origin were discovered out of the 511 locality names, most of them being of Hungarian origin! Historians in Hungary are already in consensus that Anonymus who lived three centuries after the dismounting of the Magors, invented a story with the battles of some chiefs, about which you know nothing because you do not know the language, that all these were chiefs with names understood only in Hungarian! Especially since the Hungarian archaeologist and linguist Vékony Gábor and the linguist philologist Fehér Bence, who were and are experts in the ancient Hungarian writing, called rovásírás - Hungarian-Szekler runes, published in several historical science journals that they deciphered most of the runic texts of on some grave artifacts dated from the so-called "Avar" period, starting from the 6th century to the 9th century, it seems that most of them are written in the old Hungarian language, which you can still understand today, which proves that the Hungarians and the Szeklers were the autochthonous population that spoke this language! Another renowned historian and archaeologist László Gyula, who discovered hundreds of cemeteries of Hungarians and "Onogurs" - Hungarians throughout the Carpathian Basin, but also in Transylvania, dating from the 9th and 10th centuries, came to the conclusion next: "There can be no doubt that those who dismounted in the 890s, Árpád's Hungarians, found a predominantly Hungarian population in the Carpathian Basin." Anyway, there are already hundreds of references in ancient and medieval texts to the "Urogians" - Ugors or Hungarians who were European Scythians and lived here! The Byzantine Emperor Leo VI the Philosopher wrote the following about the Hungarians in the 10th century: "A numerous, noble and free people. They do not lack in pomp and abundance, only in battle they distinguish themselves with great bravery. They shoot very well with the bow, not only the simple ones are armed to the teeth, but also their leaders are well equipped, even with horses in armor, or with guards and thick belts.... ...they are all Scythians, healthy sons of nature, they are tough, but also just, even their leaders were severely punished, and they expelled them if they were not just and fair." Metropolitan Eustathius of Thessalonica wrote about the Hungarians in the 12th century: "From the first Scythians, who were very faithful and honest, after all the foreign and impure influences through which their descendants distanced themselves... until the time when they became known as Hungarians... Therefore, as we separate water from fire, so they also separated themselves from sins... they returned to their ancient unshakable morality." Coccius Sabellicus wrote in the 15th century: "Nemini dubium sit Unnos, sive Ungaros Schytas esse" - No one doubts that the Hungarians are Scythians. Hungarian chroniclers such as Thuróczi János and Werbőczy István wrote about the real origin of the Szeklers, Werbőczy wrote the following: "The Scythians from Transylvania are the ones we call Szeklers today. These Seklers from Transylvania, who are all privileged nobles, come from the Scythian people... they were wrongly called "siculus", they who live under their own laws and customs, and are the most skilled in battle."

Only romanian sources says his name like that, as u see English saying Hunyadi 😉 stop stealing gypsies

Do you know that Hunyadi massacred Romanians during the wars? Hunyadi was a Hungarian in his soul and heart. 90% of Romanian history is a lie!

@@hetvezer5978 you were ruled by two romanians, Iancu de Hunedoara and Matei Corvin :))))

@@georgepopescu1327 Semelyik sem volt román.Ha tényleg románok lettek volna akkor miért gyilkolta mindkettő a román népet?

@@georgepopescu1327 Investigations revealed that Kun was of descent

Yeah, Remus and all these maghyars heroes that originated from great Valachia !

Just your liar fairy tales..

@@ferim.4186 Get a job, kid.you are everywhere:))))

@@zoonpolitikon89 You are going from yourself, romani?! With german false name..

Ah, those times Walachia does not entirely walachian. just 1 or 2 centuries after the Vlach come to settle those lands, which earlier name was Snowy lowland. But mongols exterminate its population, and Hungarians settled here the Vlachs. So, where is the irony? Bokorest/Bucurest, Kisjenő/Chisinau, Kijó/Kiev. Former hungarian settlements.

Except he was romanian !! But indeed he was a great hero.

@@michaelpencio9573 tell yourself. 😅 romania didn't exist that time.

@@michaelpencio9573 Do you know that Hunyadi massacred Romanians during the wars? Hunyadi was a Hungarian in his soul and heart. 90% of Romanian history is a lie

@@hetvezer5978 Nobody said about him that he was a Magyar, everyone at the time said that he was Romanian. If he was a Magyar, why did he cede the throne of Hungary to the King of Poland, why did the Magyars nobles kill one of his sons, and Mattias I of Hunedoara escaped not being killed too, then became king of Hungary by the forces of Transylvania? Simple, because he was Romanian and had nothing to do with Hungary. 100% of Hungary history is a lie.

@@ggggg895hungary Who's talking about Romania, you fool?

Romanian!!!

He had no connection with Hungary, was not born there, did not live there, did not marry there, his wife is not from Hungary, his children were born in Transylvania, on the contrary one of them was killed by the Magyars nobility, all his relatives are married to the Romanian nobles, he was not part of the Magyars nobility, he was indicated as a Romanian nobleman from Transylvania, with parents from Wallachia, so what makes him a Magyar? Nothing. He is a Romanian nobleman from Transylvania who held positions in the kingdom of Hungary.

@@magyarpower259 What is that untruth, written by me.

Például az hogy a Magyar nemességgel nem is ápolt kapcsolatot.Ő csak magyarral ált kapcsolatban.Nem használta az oláh nyelvet a mindennapjaiban csak a magyart és talán a kunt...Erdélyben ekkor alig voltak románok..Sőt, akkoriban havasalföldön is alig voltak románok....Kunok leszármazottjai éltek töbségben akik felvették az orthodox vallást...Nem propaganda amit mondok ezek:Német,Lengyel,Török,Osztrák,Magyar forrás. Drága barátom, semmi elfogultság nincsen....De ez az igazság. A románok tényleg csinálták a maguk propagandáit ahogy minden más nép...de amit a románok csinálnak az már gerinctelen hazudozás...(I'm sorry I didn't write in English.)

@@magyarpower259 What is this relationship and what is the source that indicates this? He was the most powerful man in the area, so he became the leader of the Hungarian army and then regent, but he was not part of the Hungarian nobility, he had no domain in Hungary. Popa Pius II sad he was Romanian, Frederick of Austria called him Ioan Românul, Bonfini sad about his father was Romanian. Who sad about him he was cuman or magyar?

@@magyarpower259 If you can't write în English maybe you try in Romanian.

No his real name was Hunyadi János. His cross letter is showing. Stop the primitive, inferior stealing and lieing..😉

@@ferim.4186 You disagree with history.. Iancu de Hunedoara born from Valachian father Voicu Corvin in the castle of Hunedoara given to them by Hungary for loyalty today in Transylvania Romania. Since he fought for king Sigismund and married Elisabeth Szilagy he was given leadership and honor positions in Hungary empire and as result his childrens have hungarian names.

@@georgeborcean8564 But your chavinist brothers claim it was his "real" name. This is minimum not true, but a big lie. Hunyadi never weared/used this name and nobody called him this name. This the fact yet.

@@ferim.4186 Okay it may had hungarian name because his place of birth than was in Hungarian teritory at the time. Important think here is that he was born from Valachian parents. I hope that explain it.

@@georgeborcean8564 No, Morzsinai Erzsébet his mother is not wallachian. And his father (may be ) from wallachia, but, he was cuman/mongol.

bai basinosule nu a fost ungur niciodata a fost roman get pe get mai roman ca tine.

Reached Budapest once when the country had not army at all due to the fact that it was not allowed to have armed forces(1919). And once when Romania changed the side from Axis to Sovietunio. I do not think that it is a reason to be proud about it. And I think Romania is not the strongest one in this area. Now it is big enough, but economy is low and the quality of the armed assets are obsolete.

@@mohoszsolt I don't give a shit about what the Hungarians think. I know you're a frustrated nation. or we don't care what a bunch of racists say.We must not give explanations to anyone about our history, much less a nation of criminals who killed and exterminated millions of Romanians. Today with your Orban you are an avoided subject in all the chancelleries of the world and a disappointment for the free world

@@irimescuioan9170 Well, to be honest I did not expect any explanations. I just typed this side of the truth. You did twice on that way. That happenned. That is part of the history. I did not want to hurt you, or your nationality. That is not your mistake. Would be nice to put away this kind of approach and accept the other way of thinking.

No you always backattack the other nation in outnumbered. One to one runing like the rabbit. You remember 1916..😁

You are a kid who play warcraft? 😁 but if you want to fight we are waiting, little roma..😉

🇭🇺 he was also big fighter..