1:15 "country" can also refer to an independent state and a type of subdivision lol

Hello friend, I think I should correct you something, hope you can see me，otherwise I will feel uncomfortable for several days. What you described is not how the Chinese government works, more like what the Chinese government is made of. Maybe they mean the same thing in the west, but absolutely not in China. To start with，all Chinese officials are promoted by achievements, starting from being admitted to the civil service, from the lowest level to the secretary and assistant step by step, to the district head → mayor → governor → secretary of the provincial party committee → to the central officials, and finally they can become the president of the country. In this process, they are all promoted by economic growth, people's livelihood, housing, infrastructure, science and technology patents, environment, etc. In different periods with different proportions. The performance evaluation is very frequent, and they are usually transferred to different provinces in two or three years. This is how it works

@@lianghao7128 What you said would be true of any video made of any country. Not sure why you felt it needed a clarification. Yes, they are promoted on achievements. Achievements on goals of the single party CCP. In a democracy, the achievements are judged by the people but in China and other non democracies, it’s the party or the dictator that judges achievements.

@@Homer-OJ-Simpson No，in US，they are not promoted by achievements，but by popularity. Popularity and achievement are very different，The former requires good speaking skills, good performance on stage, and the ability to answer malicious accusations and brag about his party. The second kind requires to have good record in solving practical problems on the ground.

I watched your video 5 times and I still don't understand a thing. all soo far I have seen is you say top-down and photos of the politburo and that's some random seats with colors.

They are painting a narrative, political systems that aren‘t based on anglo saxon liberalism are „tyrannical“ to them.

Yes. You said what I am about to say. Any Chinese citizens above 18 years old can vote for their local representatives, without being a CCP member.

the ccp should be destroyed by the people

I also voted once, and I am not a member of CCP🙌🏻

@@eldariskenderfranke4284China is, by definition, tyrannical.

If you replace king/queen as the head of state by voting for it and prime minister is appointed by king/queen. Prime minister appoints the governors and governors appoint mayors and such.

to understand China's regime. you have to understand Germany and Singapore first. China's regime is just a combination of them. and of cuase a bigger version.

@@louiswu6300 "NO NO NO, CHINA IS RUTHLESS DICTATORSHIP" every sinophobic

@@vivelarevolution2835 That's what west propaganda exactly told you. try to learn things deeper. Try to find a west media broadcast Beijing Olympic 2022 normally to prove that you are living in a freedom world not a political correct one.

@@louiswu6300 there is one article say my country dont have internet even though 66% of our counntry have facebook

Sounds like a good and fair system. Do you think China can have a functioning meritocratic system without censorship, oppression and cult of personality?

@@Jordan18561 they do that's the best part

Trump was unironically the best thing to happen to USA .

Oh no! as Democratic citizen I like this very much

@@technoswitch3296 yeah he showed the population how shit our system is

I would also like this, but you may be interested in another video as well- Kraut has a video comparing the state structure of china and india all the way from the dawn of both civilizations, and how they evolved into the tensions they have between eachother in the modern day. Its really in depth and really well made

Here's a lengthier video by Viki99 explaining China's governmental structure kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qNZ_rbdoxtK6e2w.html&ab_channel=Viki1999

@@mrswan7745 Kraut is a bad example of State analysis. He is the equivalent of Racial historian David Reich in Germany.

@@mrswan7745 I don't think so while his analysis has a traditionally limited vision.

This was a misinformation...if it still dwelt on those Western propaganda buzz words of "rubber stamped" , "weird", "unfortunate" , "violation of human rights" to describe the workings of CCP. For the the fact that without Western type of "democracy", CCP had 90% of approval rating, which Biden had only 35% the last time we looked...

Yes,but vote as a political show always let some party member to do.

How account is the video.. I really am trying to learn

@@olentangyriver1191 The basic structure is somewhat correct, but too general, I guess that's what you get from a short independent video. It's a vastly different system to simply compare it to let's say, the US system. It's different from it's basic ideology, which is a Marxist basic principle.

Too bad social media is banned in China. As Chinese how people react to it at first?

@@christiangada8763 Social media is not banned in China. The truth is companies like Google refused to obey the local law in China and quit from Chinese market.

@@user-rm3il1ii7i ahh so that's why, thank you for your reply, much appreciate

That would be nice but this channel sticks to 8-15min videos. That’s a 30 min video you will need.

@@Homer-OJ-Simpson or it's a multi-part series of 8-15 min videos

No CPPCC, no NCSEX, no NSC, no distinctions between party-responsible committees and state-responsible departments. Saying NPC is a legislative organ. No, this is not even the bare minimum of the wiki page for Chinese government.

TLDR: Social credit works like a no fly list, but is more transparent and is reserved for financial criminals (you need to have a court order if you were to be blacklisted)

@@CantoniaCustoms " Social credit works like a no fly list, but is more transparent and is reserved for financial criminals" Except no fly list is for people who are deemed possible terrorist. Social Credit Score system is literally in the name -- it scores you on social interactions that include silly things like jaywalking but also stuff you post online, including if you post anti-CCP content. It is not reserved just for financial criminals.

Social credit memes are actually so cringe

I follow Polymatter and all the China videos have nothing but CCP shills In comment section. It’s easy to spot because as soon I bring up the concentration camps in Xinjiang or 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, they just flat out defend China over it. I’m sure this video will attack many of the CCP shills considering China has built up an online troll network that is looking to takeover as many outlets as possible (Reddit, Twitter, KZfaq comments, etc)

@@dr.woozie7500 -9999999999999999999 Social Credit, bad work citizen! Execution Date: 2 am, 7th February 2022 (Beijing Time)

@@Homer-OJ-Simpson "everyone who disagrees with me is a paid troll"

@@user-ud5uo8fm4x the paid trolls are those who defend concentration camps in China. Do you defend Chinas concentration camps?

是的，前不久的西安和之前的南京疫情民众的反应基本上是指责地方政府。

china always been like this...i think china is one of the most hardest country to rule. many rulers did not last. Ming didnt last, Qing didnt last....good luck with PRC

​@@tedcleveland8488 Ming and Qing didnt last? 250 years each is pretty long to me. I mean current Germany and current Italy are less than 150 years old. 250 years is quite much to me

@@HelderGriff still didn’t last. pharaonic alone ruled Egypt for 3000 years.

​@@tedcleveland8488 these are modern times, you comparing ancient Egypt is skewed when you realize even the rulers and Pharoahs of Egypt changed from local rulers, to Greek rulers and so on. By the way, none of the world's foremost nations has had same system last 250 years. Not the U.K(absolute monarchy to constitutional monarchy), U.S, Germany, Italy, France, Turkey, Japan. e.t.c .

What’s funny is in other comments you are defending Chinas concentration camps and saying people shouldn’t be able to criticize China. Yeah, makes sense why you hate the social credit memes

@@Homer-OJ-Simpson provide evidence I ever said that. You literally have no argument other than calling people shill without evidence

@@dr.woozie7500 how can I link a different comment you made? Lol. you literally defended comments where people defended Chinas concentration camps and said others cannot criticize China. Let’s clear everything here then. Admit the guy you defended is wrong and say Chinas concentration camps must be condemned and people not from China should be able to criticize China.

@@urjitkhatua956 he’s a CCP troll. Look at his other comments here. He will criticize anyone that criticizes China. Even defended people who said people not from China shouldn’t be able to criticize China.

@@Homer-OJ-Simpson you are the troll here… replying to every one of my comments

Most countries and their government are younger than my grandma. For example Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Nigeria, Pakistan, etc.

Well, China as we know it today wasn't even a thing yet and was just a bunch of divided states until relatively recently.

@@regulate.artificer_g23.mdctlsk China was unified under the Han around the same time that Rome was destroying Carthage 200 years before Christ

he has the most stable country on earth while over 90 million party member. he got the easiest job out any major leaders around the world. Putin and Modi needs all that Endel more anything and out to mention sleepy joe need that the most

You are a stable genius

He has excess to gigantic tea reserves. More than enough to relax and enjoy a moment of peace and quiet.

@@bluephoenixplays9824 True, India has a looooog way to go, every leader of India need to figure out what is good for India.

@steven trollface the only people that should be in Guantanamo Bay, are the people that think we need Guantanamo Bay

It sounds like it could be a good idea, but at the same time, requiring party officials to approve every candidate running for office quickly presents a glaring opportunity for corruption. The ruling party can easily shut down opposition by just disqualifying candidates that don't serve their interest. I'm certain that the CCP has a list of subtle and not-so-subtle ways of making sure that the right people fail those background checks. It's kinda like how in the US, additional voting security measures _seem_ like a good idea (who doesn't want more security?) but are usually just a sneaky way to disqualify minority voters. Coming back to the West (specifically the US because that's what I'm familiar with), we can look at our politicians and see that _most_ politicians are relatively well qualified (with a couple glaring exceptions). That doesn't necessarily mean they're _good_ politicians, but they are _qualified_ - even our slimiest and most moronic politicians hold college degrees. We could try to set out some guidelines to automatically disqualify bad candidates, but it's hard to do that objectively without feeling like you're just drawing arbitrary lines in the sand. And if we aren't careful, it can be easily abused (like China's system, which is probably designed to be abused). But finally, there is actually a hidden requirement in our election system - you have to run a campaign well enough to actually get elected. This isn't a perfect test, especially when political parties can carry an attractive candidate so far, but it does provide some sort of barrier to entry that forces a candidate to displau public speaking and leadership skill. So yeah, the US system definitely isn't perfect, and we've had some idiots get elected or get close (my state tried to put a football player in office). But on the whole, I'd rather have the people decide who's qualified, rather than the state.

it gets to the point where calling china a dictatorship just feels like fearmongering

@@dinamosflams is it??? I mean China is a one party state that put crippling restrictions on their citizens' ability to use the internet in an attempt to prevent them from learning about the atrocities they commit. maybe you can political theory your way out of calling china a dictatorship ("umm actually it's a one party oligarchy") but it's definitely a highly authoritarian state that does not have the best interests of its citizens in mind.

@@dinamosflamsYeah I'd go as far to say it's more democratic when it comes to voting when you can vote on a local level as it makes a bigger difference, especially considering how local administrators have a the power and resources themselves.

Before Xi Jinping came to power, there were indeed a large number of corrupt and incompetent officials in the Chinese government. However, after Xi Jinping came to power, he carried out severe anti-corruption actions. The current level of integrity of the Chinese government may not be transparent enough, but I think the efficiency has reached the top level in the world.This leads to a very ironic point. Western media imagines that Chinese people don’t like Xi Jinping. In fact, almost all Chinese people recognize Xi Jinping’s crackdown on official corruption and the improvement of social atmosphere.

He literally just called your country out. Heh sure buddy

China is Dictator ship country

@@NightcorEDMchild begone

I have a question, how much power does the NPC actually hold? And, is it possible for it to pass laws that may not be in line with the political bureau's plans?

@@luzherrera4463 The NPC standing committee has a lot of power, but that's because its leaders are also high-level Party leaders (e.g. Li Zhanshu, the Chairman of the NPC Standing Committee, is also one of the seven members of the Politburo standing committee). No, the NPC will not directly go against the Party Center (党中央)'s plans. The Party Center--i.e. the Central Committee of the CPC, with its Politburo--is the nucleus of political power in China, there are no other centers of power.

there is only one party, not free at all. And also no, that'd just be what the goverment say, in reality it's not

Oh a video made by a westerner that is plagued with disinformation? No way! This is huge mistake on his part, huge.

@@christophmaier4397 stop sarcasm

There are multiple parties, but they are all part of the united front. There are also a lot of independent candidates.

@@christophmaier4397 Lies about China on KZfaq? Impossible!

As if he could tell the difference lol

@@nehcooahnait7827 cant blame him, you only know which one is which if youre fluent in either chinese or japanese

They both Chinese characters tbh it doesn't really matter.

This is actually a good point!

That’s why I’m China he who controls the army controls the nation.

That's just your usual looking at China through a western perspective the CPC is so large and so woven into the Chinese society, political and economic fabric, there is no distinction between the Party and the State. The State is the Party and the Party is the State

@@obsidianstatue The party is the state and the state is the party is a de facto statement. De jure, there is still a difference. That's why it's an interesting point that the PLA is controlled by the CCP, just as how it's an interesting that there are technically 8 parties in China.

This is a common misconception in the west, but you have to stop looking at other countries using assumptions from your governments. The CPC is legally an integral part of the National government. The CPC and the other branches of government (executive, legislative etc.) are part of a whole. It is not organized in a typical European fashion where the parties and the national government are separate and almost mutually independent. Thus it is not legally possible to sever the CPC from the rest of China's government, similar to how you can't sever the church from religious countries. The PLA command is a department under the CPC which in turn is part of the national government.

But Spain is not a federation, it's closer to a Confederation.

Finally I find someone explains what I want to say.

But how do you know who is in majority before you vote? Do you not vote in order to find out who is in majority?

EXTREMELY BRIEF some things were even wrong it's a complex subject to be fair that's why the West just find it easier to call them communist

@@tmd-w1552 LMAO

If Xi Decides everything on his own, it is obvious that Xi will die of overwork, especially in a country as huge as China with 1.4 billion people.

It's not just Xi killing a million people personally and looking at the lives of all the people on the planet? o. o. whaaaat

Captain China Xi Jinping

What were the problems of China in the last 30 years?

@@Soopy.19618 economic inequality, low social welfare, exploitation on workers, etc

from my point of view it seems that big cities like beijing or shanghai are becoming too competitive and expensive at the same time however smaller cities are having their gdp and growth currently increase due to the government’s help and also help from smaller government it seems that right now the big cities are stagnated but the smaller ones are starting to rise

@@donnieraczynski572 all of them are rising

@@tempestmars123 that’s applies to the USA as well BTW

With the current situation in Shanghai, it is more clear that central government and the local government are not aligned. Shanghai has traditionally been a rival to the power of Beijing. What will come out of the current situation? More or less opposition?

Here's a better video by Viki99 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qNZ_rbdoxtK6e2w.html&ab_channel=Viki1999 Ps who is China's enemy?

@@nicholasmwangangi6257 America, 99% percent of news of China is negative. So many people are brainwashed from fake videos exposing China. People saying bad stuff about China all the time is unfair why don’t they do it to others countries?? Why don’t they do it to America?? America has done way worst stuff than China.

@@Soopy.19618 you are wrong. I am a Chinese and you have indeed been double brainwashed. You think that USA brainwashed us to think china is wrong, your totally wrong. The real truth is China is trying to make you think that USA is brainwashing you.

@steven trollface what things?

@steven trollface what are u talkin about?? What bad things are China trying to do right now??? Answer me

Would be cool to see on the old iroquois confederacy too

@@kevinstachovak8842 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eZ52l5qDuLSvYKc.html

I hope he also covers the different colonial governement's setup like the Straits Government in Malaya and Singapore (GB), Hawa'ii pre-coup (aka american annexation)

He's done German.

You have to be vetted by at least two party members too for your application to qualify.

Plus you have to make a name for yourself.

Yes thanks for adding.

yes i heard eric li was disqualified despite his intelligent and supportive

If i'm correct jacky chan wants to join the CPC as well?

I'm not sure there's enough canon information to go in depth. Anyway the Kai is like the Pope, the election even works the same way.

I‘d been thinking of making geography videos about fictional worlds. Wonder if I should?

@@KhAnubis omg I would SO watch that

@@KhAnubis go for it I would like that.

@@KhAnubis c'mon, you are not different with Western media with murica human dirty propaganda. Ah I forgot, you are from USA. No wonder

Australia it is!

@@shonenjumpmagneto why include an independent nation?

@@KhAnubis Thank you

Except that isn't how a federal state is defined, because it was laws created in Westminster that granted the autonomy and not as part of the national constitution that gave/protect the subdivisions inherent autonomy. So, still unitary.

@@OpinionesDeJACCsOpinions I never stated the opposite of what you're saying, just the UK's extremely high level of devolution towards the countries' governments makes it a very peculiar unitary state which isn't particularly representative of how most unitary governments work in practice

Unitarian states can have autonomous regions, but in the UK the Scottish or Welsh or NI parliaments have their power given to them by Westminster, ie the parliament takes a piece of its power and lets it be exercised by another body but in theory an act of parliament can dissolve the Scottish parliament and Scotland has no legal means to do anything

It's a joke

I mean, shitting on Benny boy is a pastime even people on the Right engage in, sometimes.

Local government officials are generally not elected, we prefer to say "appointed"

Of course authoritarianism works, no one is arguing that. Criticizing a government for being despotic is a judgement of morality, not its efficacy. Is threatening people with violence to make them do things you want done effective? Absolutely. Is it moral? Not at all. And if you’re looking for countries that are truly democratic, look at Ireland, Norway, Sweden, or Denmark.

@@saladmcjones7798 did you watch the video? Who said was authoritarian? Centralized government is not authoritarian

Perfect analysis

The structure of a state is basically identical to Socialist Czechoslovakia (the country what I know most of) or any Other comunist state. All of the other states with big populations and multiple ethicities solved there problem by spreding power, (India, Russia, US, Brazil). Also China isn't that ethnically diversed in term of population. Without the communist China would already be the most powerfull country on the planet. Try to comper it to South Korea, Japan or Taiwan that is also inhabited by chinese.

@@frantisekhajek6775 那几个国家太小了，人口也少，有一个或几个支柱产业就可以让他们整个国家过得很好，更不用说像三星台积电这样的支柱企业都获得了美国的支持，小国和大国没法放在一起比较

@@frantisekhajek6775 很多个三星都养不起中国这样的大国，而且关键是中国也不会获得美国的支持

@@user-ls4fv5dh8k 没错，一个台积电可能能在台湾岛贡献20%GDP，但在中国，大概就是0.几的水平了

Tf

Hysterical how sheep in America think they haven't had a score for decades now, at least China doesn't pretend it don't exist, cough patriot act cough cough Never trust anyone or anything calling itself patriotic

@@xp8969 yeah like seriously lol how is china strict our great saviour and leader and visionary just disciplines 100 million people and our current god is just sending billionaires and sports personalities and Muslims in a uhhhhh special ed program.

@@xp8969 hey CCP shill, what’s your social credit score? I see you are defending China all over this channel and criticizing Taiwan saying it isn’t a democracy but rather a US puppet state. Even defending chians concentration camps. Do they actually pay you 50rmb per post or do you do it for free to join the CCP party?

@@xp8969 btw, social credit score is MUCH more than a fiscal credit score. Fiscal credit scores are just private business (banks) scoring your ability to pay back a loan if they give you a loan. Social credit score is the GOVERNMENT scoring your social rating which includes how much you support the GOVERNMENT. It is used not only on loans but even your ability to pay cash for services. So like a typical CCP shill you are, you like to pretend they are the same

这种投票不就是走过场。

@@user-bc3wn2lw7u 下次办一个综艺节目就可以骗自己不是走过场了🤣

The more things change, the more they stay the same?

@@mojungle3054 Search for "the Mandate of Heaven", it's a medieval country living in the 21st century.

@@mojungle3054 As long as people lust for power, the cycle of dynasties would never end

@@lingu8023 i'm pretty sure the current chinese government doesn't believe in the mandate of heaven or follow it, but if i'm wrong tell me so

Coincidentally the government is also just as tyrannical as the old absolute monarchy

It is indeed extraordinarily complicated. Frankly it's a miracle it all works at all. Though the Chinese have had an impressive bureaucracy for thousands of years now.

Don't think China's governmental structure as western-like gov't structure, whether it's democratic or communist. Think of it as 60-70% of the system has similarities of ancient Chinese bureaucracy, and the rest are bits of pieces of democratic, socialist, and communist features. Even in ancient times, the dynasties always had many factions within the court to fight for power or against any betrayals. At least that's what some Chinese people told me. LOL.

probably because their system is different than Western and even the Soviet one, its a hybrid between Soviet and Chinese traditional bureaucracy, many of the committees are in fact a replica of that in Qing Dynasty, for example there are 2 head of provinces 1 being Province Party Secretary the other being Province Governor, it was too a long practice dated back to Ming and Qing dynasty, reason of that is to divide the power on local government to prevent separatism

It's because it's a completely different mindset from the basic structure to the very top. There's no way to understand it if you try to understand it using bases of what you understand in other political structure.

This army was almost built by Zedong Mao from nothing, and China is a one party government, i guess no one else can share the authorities of the army then.

David Rockefeller funded the army though.

Not if you think of the CCP as the "second chamber" of the legislative arm of the government.

from the looks of it. technically the party is the government. so there is no party, it is the government. the word party is just a label. so its technically a no party government. every politician is on his own.

I'm not sure if this make any sense actually, the only difference is China has one party but the power is not any different from a "democratic" country. It's clear that most countries the military have a strong dominance over the estabilished power, doesn't really matter that much the Party that seems in charge.

the capital of japan, before meijin restoration where the emperor move to Edo and rename it to Tokyo, the capital of Japan is Kyoto, Kyo (Capital), to (capital/city)

It gets better: Sichuan is basically "four rivers", its got four large rivers running through it Shanghai means "on the ocean", its a port at the yangtze to the pacific Henan - south of river Hebei - north of river Hunan - south of lake Hubei - north of lake Guangdong - Big East Guangxi - Big West Heilongjiang - Black Dragon River

China also has a city named Xinxiang, which means New York in Chinese.

Well, we call our own planet a word that means "dirt", so it is not so difficult to see why the "lack of imagination" comes from. Besides, it is an easy way to describe the place, and maybe the person was hangry (no, not written wrong), too tired and pissed to invent a "poetic" name for their town. And let's be honest, there is places and towns with "lazy" names EVERYWHERE...

In fact, this is the influence of Chinese history on modern times. Many dynasties in ancient China implemented the multi-capital system. The reason why Beijing is called Northern Capital is because in the Ming Dynasty, a vassal king rebelled and seized power, and then decided to move the capital to his fiefdom in the north, which is Beijing; the original capital still retains a set of administrative institutions called Southern Capital

Western world? South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Philippines all have democracies. I guess you’re looking for someone to not criticize an authoritarian oppressive regime - the type that has concentration camps and who controls all news and information.

@@Homer-OJ-Simpson come on, I am not trying to defend Chinese government policies. I am not Chinese but still I don't like content creators or news reporters or social medias talking shit about other country asif they don't have their own problems.

@@kingclan007 but it’s not about western if you acknowledge that Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Philippines also have democracies. Or are you under the impression that democracy only exists in the west?

@@kingclan007 also, why shouldn’t someone not from China be able to criticize the concentration camps in China? Why can people ONLY criticize their own country? That’s sounds very authoritarian if you.

@@Homer-OJ-Simpson The West means western civilization, which is a global culture shared by the US and its allies, thats what western means in this context. And what he meant by westerners trashtalking China is because westerners dont like not-western powers, like China and Russia. If they really cared about democracy, they would topple Saudi Arabia´s government for being an absolute monarchy for example, instead of Iran for example. The USA has overthrown democratic governments if they were left-winged. And dont get me started on genocides or camps.

The Chinas government works well

It’s more of the meritocratic nature of the Chinese Government, due to a history of being the very first state and emphasis on governing well.

The Standing Committee of NPC is the de facto legislative body of China, and of course almost coincides with a party equivalent. They do to many extend discuss, debate and care about each other’s opinions within that heavily gatekept power circle of theirs based on rough majoritarian principles.

@@AlliedMastercomputer1967 yes

The reason why people think the Standing Comittee is just rubber stamping is because the SC does not vote like a parliament does. Rather it works through very thorough discussion and scrutiny of policy and politicians and at the end of a session members of the SC usually agree on a strong majority consensus. However, this process is very untransparent as far as I know because most of this happens behind closed doors I think. So you never really know who critiqued what and who voted on what. However, this systems obviously has done wonders for China.

The video is wrong, not only party members participate in elections, all people do.

this dude have no idea what the f cuk he talking about! 🤷‍♂️

He doesn'5 know Kaifeng Jews exist in China.

@@sonofyoutube6248 +10 social credit

@@magnuscritikaleak5045 and he's supposed to?

You should also check out Viki1999 video about that same subject :)

The world is a cubical sphere sometimes 2D

Ok, I didn't expect this coming from a COMMUNIST leader

@@agnivnandi5538 Modern interpretations of *socialism* (not communism) does not reject the use of markets. Markets ≠ capitalism.

@@user-wb7ez9ud4p But they are the Communist Party, not the Socialist Party

@@agnivnandi5538 Doesn't matter. The government is socialist by definition and practice. There was NEVER a single communist government on this planet.

bruh momento

他们甚至分不清政协和人大的区别，只能说当他们像了解美国政体那样熟悉中国政体，才是真正重视中国吧ヾ(≧▽≦*)o

What you said would be true of any video made of any country. Not sure why you felt it needed a clarification. Yes, they are promoted on achievements. Achievements on goals of the single party CCP. In a democracy, the achievements are judged by the people but in China and other non democracies, it’s the party or the dictator that judges achievements.

@@Homer-OJ-Simpson No，in US，they are not promoted by achievements，but by popularity. Popularity and achievement are very different，The former requires good speaking skills, good performance on stage, and the ability to answer malicious accusations and brag about his party. The second kind requires to have good record in solving practical problems on the ground.

@@Homer-OJ-Simpson so Biden is promoted to be president? no, instead, Biden tell you what he will do, and you appoint him by the vote of the majority, there is no guarantee on what he will deliver, or if he can deliver what he promised. he also not going to be elected because he did a great job as wise president, how is this even call promotion.

@@yzy8638 yes, Biden is promoted to be president. He showed success as senator and VP and people liked what he accomplished. If your point is that it’s about accomplishments AND messaging, I will agree. But it’s the same in the CCP.

@@lianghao7128 you seem highly uneducated on the topic. Biden accomplished a lot as VP and senator. that is reason why he was chosen as president. Now, was he also chosen because of the message he promoted? Sure - but that’s the Same as the CCP. They are promoting people who are messaging what the party wants to hear. In fact, the CCP goes another step further. It’s about Internal politics as well. That’s why Xi purged much of the opposition to consolidate power and it’s less about achievements now and more about allegiance.

As an Indonesia 🇮🇩, im agree with you

Education reform of where?

提案是由人大代表提交，然后小组讨论审议代表团全体审议后再由主席团审议后，才会确定提案上不上最终议程。我们最终看到表决的提案基本上都是经过了层层审议的，所以通过率才会那么高。因为不靠谱的提案在前几轮审议中就刷下去了，每次人大会网上不都会爆出来一堆的异想天开匪夷所思的提案么？哪个能最终走到最终表决环节？

你应该了解一下中国的政治协商制度

@来自涂山 some of the border disputes are with India

@@prometheus7387 most of the disputed areas with india isn't populated

台湾就是中国的，cnm

@@aircloud1795 that is not true. Southern Tibetan Region, or Arunachal Pradesh, a de facto state of India, has a population of 1.38 million. This is the mess left by British and its sizable population is probably the reason why China won’t get it back. Don’t blame this mess on either India or China. Blame the Brits.

@@nehcooahnait7827 Ah I see, I was thinking about the region where there was only a few snow leopards

communist party selection is open to anyone basically. my wife got an invitation just for her skills (but rejected because of me) eligibility criteria for a gov worker is university diploma and a government exam (which minorities get a bit of a privilege for but that's fine) eligibility for a political representative though is pure skill in the field the higher the position. for the entry level, it's mainly a clean police record, cities require more than villages.

That doesn't happen in all democracies. Peoples interest are put forward instead of Dictatorship like china

@@sumeersamarat706 Without political parties you just get an oligarchy like in the US, even with political parties like in Europe the system is always ready to defend their party interests and slide into an ochlocracy if desired.

@@Breakfast_of_Champions oligarchy is more worser in china. China adopted worst of Capitalism and Worst of communism in practice. Social inequality is clearly visible in china . The Housing registration laws creating internal classism

lol

IKR! So much fake negative news about China

@@Soopy.19618 I wonder why

@@Borisdelmar so u don’t know why there is so much fake negative news about China?

@@Borisdelmar find me any video and I will explain why this is fake

Then you must be extra dumb then. It's not rocket science, and none of it is a secret.

The most of knowledge in this video is actually included in our course books of politics and geography in high school... The political traditions of CPC are also easy to get if you watch news.

@@amberyao6493 Not in my schools... I live in Calgary, Canada so we mostly learn about Canadian things. My parents and I moved from China to Russia back to China then to Canada in 2003. Also, they tend to completely use Chinese to explain CCP stuff, although we are fluent in English. I can listen and speak some Chinese, but not if the sentences or words are complicated. My parents usually speak in long, complex Chinese sentences that I don't know the meanings of when talking about this.

@@user-wb7ez9ud4p My parents tend to completely use long, complicated Chinese sentences to explain CCP stuff, although we are fluent in English and live in Canada. I can listen to and speak some Chinese, but not if the sentences or words are complicated. 🌀🐇🐇🐣🐣 Also, I never took interest in these governmental stuff. I just randomly listened to this video.

@@mapofthesoultagme7143 Oh, sorry I thought you grew up in China. I am kind of surprised that common knowledge on one side could be so new on the other side. By the way, I think the tone on Chinese government and CPC in this video are still very biased. The medias here are too obsessed with ideological crap.

Honestly don't think either explains it well. Local administrators and powers have much more power compared to like states in the US, they are given resources, goals and help from the top but they are still competing on a local level and vote upwards on who should represent them, but at the same time as you said there can't be a bottom up system but top down is also not really accurate