your are doing this wrong, when I fail safe I set my motor to 100% throttle.
@WilkieaSt5 жыл бұрын
RTM return to moon
@some1695 жыл бұрын
Kris, my name is also Kris!!😀😂
@WilkieaSt5 жыл бұрын
@@some169 awesome! I had a skin-check appointment recently .. they had me down as "Khris" 😑😪
@henrykidman43645 жыл бұрын
@@WilkieaSt bruh
@WilkieaSt5 жыл бұрын
@@henrykidman4364 🤘😑🤘
@alonzofpv3646 жыл бұрын
This is the funniest rotor riot video I’ve seen 😂
@BubbyFPV5 жыл бұрын
Yes it is
@strikerjamie6 жыл бұрын
Is this rotor riot or the Kardashians?
@ummagawdFPV6 жыл бұрын
it's the KWADashians
@lanesilva92344 жыл бұрын
ummagawd lol
@User_17953 жыл бұрын
Thats what I said
@tomelner6 жыл бұрын
Love the group dynamics. These episodes are getting really entertaining. Josh is such a great addition to the team
@andrewallen64066 жыл бұрын
I would have liked to seen the FLYSKY
@jakegarrett81096 жыл бұрын
Yeah, throw in a $45 Flysky i6 at least. I'd also like to know if the included 2 antenna receiver (AFHDS 2A) is better than the older single antenna from the Turnigy 9x(AFHDS protocol), and how much better those are than the sub 1 gram micro receiver (seems to work fine on my 250mm quad, with the 600mW 5.8 Ghz VTX with clover antena the limiting factor). However, I'm planning on trying out some high powered 1.3 Ghz VTX and a ground station for quads (I have a HAM licence). Receivers I use: www.banggood.com/IRangX-Tiny-2_4G-6CH-Flysk-Receiver-Compatible-with-Flysky-PPM-Output-for-Eachine-QX80-QX90-QX95-p-1089802.html?rmmds=detail-top-buytogether-auto__9&cur_warehouse=CN www.banggood.com/FlySky-FS-iA6-2_4G-6CH-Receiver-For-RC-Airplane-p-985684.html?rmmds=detail-left-hotproducts__1&cur_warehouse=CN hobbyking.com/en_us/turnigy-9x-2-4ghz-8ch-receiver-v2.html
@MrAlansage6 жыл бұрын
I'm curious as well I have never failsafe with any of my AFHDS 2a receivers but I have failsafe with the AFHDS system
@LongusFPV6 жыл бұрын
Me too, I can go 1 km with the fs-i6x and could probably go a bit further, just don't like to search for my quad. Maybe the afhds2 protocol gets more attention when the Dark Knight controller comes out.
@iforce2d6 жыл бұрын
I have tested fs-i6 + fs-ia6b to 450 meters at 40cm above ground (on r/c car) and to 2300m at about 100m above ground level, both in low noise areas. Looks like in this test they are about 2m or so above ground and with some road traffic, and another transmitter right nearby. So I would estimate in this test the flysky would probably get about 400-500 meters.
@KrzychOlsztyn6 жыл бұрын
Andrew Allen I'm on flysky and I've got very good range without any mods. I would like to see flysky i6 vs frsky qx7
@jason112866 жыл бұрын
Now retailers are going to be like "what the hell, why can't we keep this radiolink junk in stock all of a sudden??"
@BadwolfFPV6 жыл бұрын
sold mine for the taranis, dang it
@nicholascgoss6 жыл бұрын
I love how everyone says “eewww DJI yuck” but they all own one 😂🤣😂🤣
@arkaei3 жыл бұрын
and it outranges all of their others too 😂
@MrGaussFPV6 жыл бұрын
"This isn't a Bangood piece of s***!" Hahahaha!
@Gosuminer6 жыл бұрын
It kinda is www.banggood.com/-p-1092053.html
@MrGaussFPV6 жыл бұрын
Snorkl FPV, hahahaha! It kinda is...
@ziggyzbeak6 жыл бұрын
Banggood has all that shit they are testing
@PinchTune5 жыл бұрын
I seriously cracked up on that too.
@air-headedaviator18056 жыл бұрын
Why walk your kwad? *YOU CAN FLY!!!* 😂
@ummagawdFPV6 жыл бұрын
zactly!
@JaydenLawson6 жыл бұрын
Bring back Chad Nowak!
@theflyingfanatic36845 жыл бұрын
Is this reality tv now it felt like u was watching the Kardashians
@HeathNielsen6 жыл бұрын
I guess Bardwell learned something about DJI.
@StudioCreations6 жыл бұрын
I was super happy to see the RR Crew test the toy quads in this video. I too was impressed with the Airhogs DR1 Drone for it's range and handling ability. I cut my teeth with the DR1 while learning quadracing last year. One thing I would suggest anyone buying the DR1 Drone is buy or 3d-print a "X" shaped Stiffener Brace for the motors. As the drone crashes into things, it hits the motor shrouds and stresses the connection points. The Stiffener Brace supports the motors from flexing and over-stressing the frame plastic. This allows for longer lasting drone usage!!!!
@CAPTAINDRONE7986 жыл бұрын
Joshua your gonna learn something today. You shouldn't kick someones $1200 drone over and power it off by removing the battery.... unless you're my grandpa.
@Siamect6 жыл бұрын
Actually you should... This is a DJI product flaw, not a Bardwell induced problem. So... DJI you're gonna learn something today! :)
@nicholascgoss6 жыл бұрын
I’ve never kicked any of my quads over to pick it up
@JShel145 жыл бұрын
Bruuuh, I just got so mad for him when he did that. Mother of god.
@recon_fpv5 жыл бұрын
I feel bad for you if you have a $1200 quad that can't handle being kicked over.
@JShel145 жыл бұрын
it's not so much that it can't handle it. It's more so the feeling of someone kicking of 1200 dollars worth of flying camera equipment. I just got the Mavic pro 2, and that ends up at around $2000 with insurance. It's super cringy to think of handling expensive equipment so nonchalantly, if that makes sense.
@thlrock6 жыл бұрын
"Tommy coming in at Mach F*ck!" should be the was Ummagawd is introduced in EVERY SINGLE VIDEO! I died laughing.
@isftommy24056 жыл бұрын
Master Bardwell dropping knowledge as always
@echaitea6 жыл бұрын
ISFTOMMY except for dji
@isftommy24056 жыл бұрын
everyones got an "achilles heel" lol
@JoeKunsch6 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favorite episodes. Really shows the pilots and how real they are. Thanks guys!
@jhminix6 жыл бұрын
This is easily the best rotor riot programming I have seen to date. Funny, dramatic, entertaining and informative.
@PeterKornum6 жыл бұрын
THIS reality format rulles! Put Them on an Island for a month IT WILL BE EPIC!
@digitalmojofpv62176 жыл бұрын
I have a radio link radio that came with a ready to fly quad when I first got into quads.. great little cheap radio!
@yosayogi5394 жыл бұрын
Lol I still come back to this video to enjoy the outcome result of the Radiolink transmission distance test. Oh how I love that when I started this hobby and purchased my very first setup from someone it was the QAV 250 with blue series bb2 12a esc's a cc3d revo f4 with op link and the trusted and tested Radiolink AT 9 with the r9ds receiver. That was in mid 2016 and still to this day I have and use the same setup on that 250QAV rig. Amazing results I have recorded and documented. Thank you rotor riot for this video
@InLoveWithFlight6 жыл бұрын
You guys, this is by far the best episode, ever :) I'd love to see more of this mode of operation. I wonder how much even slight differences in altitude (llike a foot more or less) made a difference in the measurements?
@dronexfun84696 жыл бұрын
Radiolink is underrated.
@matthewnoblejordan35555 жыл бұрын
I have flown radio link for years, I love it. I've had frsky and spectrum and tbh no comparison, at altitude I've never, ever, not once failsafed with radio link
@jaysmith26615 жыл бұрын
@@matthewnoblejordan3555 yes, I also have one, Radiolink AT9S
@grabejud4 жыл бұрын
radiolink at9 was my first hobby grade rc before moving to frsky. the range test surprise me.
@The_real_dennis6 жыл бұрын
Radiolink at9 rules! ✌️
@TheTwistedStone6 жыл бұрын
This is the type of TV I want to watch ! You guys have the comedy but still manage to get the info across while giving great entertainment.
@tcoffel346 жыл бұрын
One of my first "newer" radios I bought in 2014 / 2015 was a Radiolink AT10 in orange.I had other radios of course, but it was new to me, so I bought it, and loved it. Still have it to this day!
@KeyofTMajor6 жыл бұрын
i like how bardwells in more RR vids. what about my guy Charpu tho! wheres he been?
@licensetodrive99306 жыл бұрын
He's been busy 3D rendering all the cool 'flight footage' the Rotor Riot guys do... :D
@WhiskyMystery6 жыл бұрын
Busy animating Dreamworks movies
@beison80006 жыл бұрын
Bardwell belongs on Rotorriot
@brendongyde6 жыл бұрын
Can't stand the guy full stop. Just my personal opinion.
@lukasmakessomething73226 жыл бұрын
He’s animating
@RcAddict886 жыл бұрын
so what did we learn today well never kick a mans mavic over haha
@eric-janvandenbogaard94156 жыл бұрын
i guess it was a natural reaction for a DJI product :)
@Honeypot-x9s6 жыл бұрын
Eric-Jan van den Bogaard dji hate is I guess out of jealousy for owning a product far more expensive than most racer quad owners are willing to shell out. It’s completely different communities behind both drones... dji is more about areal photography and incredible stable videos and range. and racer quads are all about fun aspect of it all. Mavic Pro is a masterpiece of technical engineering. Nearly 30 minute battery life, 4K video, multiple fail safes, GPS , obstical avoidance, and beautiful range. I was on vacation few weeks ago and took my mavic Pro and my GF took her mavic air and we both decided to see how far we can push our drones over open ocean water. Because we rented a boat it wasn’t a big deal to ignore return to home. My mavic Pro got 6.37 miles on a single battery... the wind was not ideal either, 10mph cross breeze. My GF on her mavic Air managed to get 4.35 miles and was running on fumes landed on the boat with 4% power and was fighting the drone because it was slowing down and reducing its altitude. Interms of wireless range.. testing from the island, I managed to make it to mainland which is just over 3 miles... was a cell Tower causing interference, but it got all the over there. Entire time 5/5 bars of signal until I go around 150 feet of the tower. Then dropped to 1/5 bars. My GF on her mavic Air which is WiFi based only managed little over 2 miles before combo of battery life and low range hit and she panic initiated RTH. 2 mile mark her WiFi signal was 2/5 bars... and dropped to 0/5 bars and flashing weak signal/interference just as she noticed was below 50% battery remaining after she clicked cancel on RTH alert at 60%. with the wind stiring up she was panicking
@cashe3816 жыл бұрын
By the time you factor in goggles, transmitter, the quad and the countless repairs and upgrades you will be doing, racing drones unfortunately end up being much price-yr in the long run.. Its pretty rare to crash a video drone if you know what you are doing. As for the hate I think a lot of it comes from the fact that most mini quad pilots tend to be much more electronically smart/experienced as building, tuning, flying etc isn't really something you can just go out and understand quickly. when an average joe can just go to Best Buy and purchase a DJI they usually suck at flying resulting in a lot of the regulations that are now in place. If you go and look at all of the drone mishaps that get on the news pretty much all of them are DJI Joes. The quads themselves isn't what brings hate its the people who fly them.
2018’s threat. “You lost your link in the description” 😂
@loboquad21226 жыл бұрын
Great video, I definitely appreciate and enjoy seeing more real world testing. Although we should all pay attention to optimize our gear, most of us do something less for durability or out of being lazy. Seems to me you all had a great time making this video, you all were laughing and had me totally entertained, thanks!
@LazerLord104 жыл бұрын
I have FRsky and I'm lucky to get more than 100 meters....
@Trumpethon3 жыл бұрын
I flew Frsky for years you should have way better range then 300feet..
@LazerLord103 жыл бұрын
@@Trumpethon Yeah, I know. That's why I feel like something is definitely wrong.
@breakalegfpv95325 жыл бұрын
I think this format of production is best for the viewer. peace .. F
@bicky4206 жыл бұрын
I have seen pretty much every RR episode since the inception. This blows them all away. Epic.
@vaughanheilman13256 жыл бұрын
I like bardwell's addition to the team! Very much a generalization of personality, but two thinkers plus two rippers equals a nice foursome😎
@nicksb48146 жыл бұрын
I was about to go to sleep. And then this popped up. Yaaaayyyy...
@eric-janvandenbogaard94156 жыл бұрын
could you sleep afterwards ? :)
@SweetThangFPV6 жыл бұрын
I really LOVED the format of this video, its edited like a reality show episode where they comment during the shots. AWESOME!
@jacksonshipmun25276 жыл бұрын
The style of this video was way more entertaining than I would have thought. Couldn't stop cracking up
@mnike7426 жыл бұрын
I do understand that this video was for fun, however the results of this test are invalid (mainly focusing on the Specktrum, FrSky, RadioLink, and TBS crossfire.) There are too many variables. The antenna placements are different for every quadcopter (which was addressed.) The transmitting power, frequency, and antenna for the video system are unaddressed. The transmitting antenna for each transmitting system varied (addressed.) For the results to be truly valid they would need to used the same quadcopter and same antenna placement for each system at the same power. I apologize for the long comment however I thought I should post this as a "disclaimer".
@MrMike73326 жыл бұрын
Rotor riot has never claimed to be scientific. It's just a test based on a real world scenario. Just enjoy. If someone states that it is a scientific test like bardwell then it's understandable to question the methods to eliminate variables like the goggle module video.
@Olivier-C6 жыл бұрын
.... plus they were flying under power lines, that's a massive source of randomness :)
@JoshuaBardwell6 жыл бұрын
Yes. We said that in the video.
@eric-janvandenbogaard94156 жыл бұрын
correct, a high frequency TX should not be such a great problem for a RX with a lo(wer) frequency. but..... the other way round should be more of a problem.
@Kabab6 жыл бұрын
I mean, I'm no angel but....... it's like, open countryside. Nonetheless this 'whatever' testing was entertaining. Bardwell is a really great addition.
@cartergreene55716 жыл бұрын
Sup
@AbdulAleemShekhani6 жыл бұрын
I think this is one of my favourite RR videos so far, the only one in which I'm willing to tolerate Drew and Kapper. Edit was great too! Feels much better and more entertaining than before. Great stuff guys, more please :D
@rpm-zr4fh6 жыл бұрын
I use the radiolink AT9, it was my first transmitter and I have considered replacing it with a crossfire one but maybe not now. This makes me happy.
@djilly756 жыл бұрын
no flysky????? come on you got to give flysky some props
@dronedoutrc59706 жыл бұрын
This is the second RR vid I have seen and damn it was funny. As cheap as a radiolink set up is why not try it? I think I may. I like the look of the radio. I have a qx7 with the M7 gimbals and the R9M with a R9 Mini. It would be interesting to see how they compare. Really loved the Drib tripping on Bardwell moment. Funny stuff.
@ruddersidedown6 жыл бұрын
Great video guys! Just like other people said, JB is a great addition to the team. You guys pull more of his just want to have fun side out over science ( don't pull it all away. lol). Plus he just adds to all your energy. Great combo of pilots! Definitely feel a new chapter in FPV opening up for more mainstream.
@cragsolutions11295 жыл бұрын
I've flown radiolink for 3 years. It's main selling point is the lack of frequency noise (no other pilots). I've NEVER had a failsafe issue with any of my builds using radiolink rx. 90mm to 210. Controllers have a good quality feel also.
@SvPVids6 жыл бұрын
RadioLink 4 life
@ronaldcaudill20896 жыл бұрын
amen love my radiolink ,,, has never failsafed on me ,, ever
@mikelazar80615 жыл бұрын
at9 ftw
@WarChest6 жыл бұрын
Is it bizarre that I like Bardwell more on RR videos than on his own channel? (He's got really great info on his channel but something about his personality with others seems to bring out the best version of himself.)
@unclebuck59576 жыл бұрын
Joshua can't believe you did that. This was fun to watch
@afrog26665 жыл бұрын
"you kicked my fucking mavic!??" lmao xD
@reidkauffman35936 жыл бұрын
I think you guys left the Little tikes helicopter in Sarasota Florida. It has an Instagram page now. @range_test_helicopter
@dustydragon4206 жыл бұрын
no Flysky? lol
@jonnyphenomenon6 жыл бұрын
this was the most fun I've had watched a rotor riot video in a while. hiliarious!
@jakbower46092 жыл бұрын
make another range test! We need Express LRS vs crossfire, vs tracer..... and many more!
@MrAlansage6 жыл бұрын
Great episode guys!!! But we need to know the range of the FlySky i6 AFHDS 2a system. I've heard that ibus has a lower latency than sbus.
@JoshuaBardwell6 жыл бұрын
alan sage iBus only has lower latency at short range. As you get further away it's latency goes way up but since everybody tests on the bench this always gets missed.
@Siamect6 жыл бұрын
This is true for Crossfire too. Mine (Micro TX and Nano receivers) switches to 50Hz about 75m away so on a big racetrack you are back to 50Hz update.
@JoshuaBardwell6 жыл бұрын
If you are super concerned about latency, this is one argument for using the 2 watt module even at shorter range.
@adhvikchandran6346 жыл бұрын
Umm..... Flysky??
@williwonti6 жыл бұрын
It goes miles.
@thesral966 жыл бұрын
williwonti Yeah we all know it doesn't and it seems to be quite inconsistent. I've never had any problems even with quite some range but i've heard from failsave after 10 metres
@williwonti6 жыл бұрын
This guy seems to have good luck with his: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gcCReJSiqtSth6c.html
@JoshuaBardwell6 жыл бұрын
None of us has a Flysky device. We only "tested radiolink" because somebody happened to have the transmitter and we were curious about its range claims.
@adhvikchandran6346 жыл бұрын
oh kk, but you should test it because of it's economical price and decent features. fingers crossed for a review in the future!! :-D p.s - Also, flysky supposedly has less latency because it has less algorithms, or something like that. link : www.propwashed.com/community-spotlight-flysky-vs-frsky-radio-latency/
@goober247876 жыл бұрын
This video was absolutely incredible! Lol please do more like this!! I love the gear testing/ comparison
@kristiandior41674 жыл бұрын
Keeping up with the rotor riots
@mikehedrick43496 жыл бұрын
Why no flysky or turnigy evolution?
@mikehedrick43496 жыл бұрын
z it's the newer 2a protocol. So how is it out dated? Why do all the plane guys use flysky then? Either way, they should have included flysky over radiolink that no one has ever heard of? Unless they knew it would make all their overpriced crap seem like overpriced crap? Pretty sure they knew what the results would be before the video was made. Clickbait for the masses.
@Mantarr16 жыл бұрын
I still prefer my Evolution/X6b setup over my heavy clunky Taranis. When FrSky finally release their copy of the Evolution form factor I will probably switch back though.
@mikehedrick43496 жыл бұрын
Fred F ya I'm waiting for it too. Just gotta sell my house so I can afford one.
@KittFPV6 жыл бұрын
9:59 BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
@kimchikoalaa7146 жыл бұрын
I love thie edits between commentary and the actual day, so chill
@lukabalta2398 Жыл бұрын
i love how people were still proud to rock frsky 😂 nowadays feels illegal to say that name
@KrzychOlsztyn6 жыл бұрын
Where is fly sky vs frsky comparison? 🙄
@TrezeFPV6 жыл бұрын
you need to try L9R receiver of the FrSky
@joshfinley856 жыл бұрын
FPV Beach Racer the l9r is the worst rx frsky put out. I've used frsky for 2 years now in quads and 3d planes ... the taranis is a great radio. Frsky make great stuff but the l9r I put in one plane and the signal ended up being the worst ... it was laggy ...slow and in range test was worse then the other recievers I use. Just my experience
@TrezeFPV6 жыл бұрын
Josh Finley sorry but I use L9R with tbs unify 800mw on my drone racing and I can go more than 1km at the beach with low flight and min 80% rssi osd, its better than XSR or XM+
@TrezeFPV6 жыл бұрын
I have vídeo on my channel with the drone
@joshfinley856 жыл бұрын
FPV Beach Racer well those are supposed to have smaller range... but if you use an x4r or even the x7r ii or whatever it is you'd be in for a surprise I'd say..
@TrezeFPV6 жыл бұрын
Josh Finley FrSky say that L9R have 2x more range because not have telemetry and by my experience I agree, I never have failsafe with it and have some vídeos with 7km range no KZfaq, Rotor Riot can use also frsky 900mhz module, I think will have a nice range, maybe more than crossfire
@LuigiBakker6 жыл бұрын
Europe here, we don't speak ft, we speak meters...it would have been nice to add some overlays showing the result in all formats. If I got it right, in order: - FrSky: 1927 ft = 587m - Spektrum: 2014 ft = 613m - Crossfire: 2731 ft = 832m - Radiolink: 2854 ft = 869m - Mavic Air: 3328 ft = 1014m - Mavic: 4698 ft = 1431m This episode was funny especially because it's really true this question comes back all the time. But it still feels a bit wrong when none of the FrSky or Spektrum setups are considered to be optimal. One question thought, why not using Crossfire/Radiolink all the time if it can go further?
@jdnic16 жыл бұрын
the reason why people failsafe back then, is because they use the dsmx satellite. Which is not designed to be a standalone antenna. Nowadays spectrum makes a specialized receivers for quadcopters. Also the stock spektrum transmitter have a crappy antenna. But upgraded, it can go farther.
@MateusLeonardoMendes6 жыл бұрын
Flysky would certainly beat them all hahaha
@jakegarrett81096 жыл бұрын
Maybe, we'll never know.. They should have spent the $45 and bought the Flysky i6 just to know. It seems to have further range with a sub 1 gram micro receiver than I get with my 600mW 5.8 Ghz VTX with clover antenna. However, I've got a HAM licence, so I'd like to know if it would be the limiting factor if I use a high power 1.3 Ghz VTX and ground station.
@JoshuaBardwell6 жыл бұрын
When you say "they should have bought the Flysky" you are seriously overestimating the preparation that went into this video. Chad happened to have the radiolink with him and we were curious about the range claims. So I put radiolink on my quad and we found a straight length of road and made this video. There was no time to get a Flysky system. The entire video went from concept to completion in under 48 hours.
@jakegarrett81096 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the reply JB. Since A lot of comments are about wanting to see a Flysky comparison, I think that would be a great thing to test on your channel since you do a lot more scientific testing. It would be great to see a rematch with all the antennas in the same location/orientation/quad, that way we could get a more accurate comparison. I'd love to see something like that on your channel. Thanks JB, have a great day!
@iforce2d6 жыл бұрын
How exactly does Tommy define "proven" :)
@Clynikal6 жыл бұрын
iforce2d about crossfire? Maybe “proven” means “trying my best not to piss off trappy”. You really can’t compare the gloriously noise free unspoilt terrain of your backyard flying flysky and 25mw 5.8 out to 5km to anything these guys do. I think it’s safe to say that crossfire has earned it reputation for long range and equally you’ve earned the respect of the community for blowing our minds with the extremes of what our gear can do in the right hands.
@tanmay______6 жыл бұрын
Clynikal stole my exact thoughts:)
@ziggyzbeak6 жыл бұрын
You think LOL
@MBrulla6 жыл бұрын
"Is this a Banggood POS?!" LMFAO!!!
@GoUp996 жыл бұрын
Drew is a great addition to the team
@inZaneFPV6 жыл бұрын
Really enjoyed that guys, good to see JB there too!
@henryread-spinks40606 жыл бұрын
"You can failsafe anything" You obviously havent heard of 72mhz at 1w
@MTeuteberg6 жыл бұрын
Best episode ever, couldn't stop laughing xD
@saszkod5 жыл бұрын
Greetings from Poland 😀😀😀
@mistery796 жыл бұрын
Drews an emotional mess.
@NarWhat6 жыл бұрын
It was entertaining, but the side interview thing really felt out of place.
@BOTGRINDER6 жыл бұрын
ahh i loved that part! it was like vh1 behind the scenes!
@PixelFPV6 жыл бұрын
Straight up one of the best episodes I've seen in a long time. Loved seeing JB in it as well!
@ronaldcaudill20896 жыл бұрын
i bought a storm brand owl 3 inch box frame on ebay and it came with a radiolink at9 ,, and i love it ,, have had it for over a year now and i put the radiolink receiver in all my drones ,, i have never had it fail me ever or drop out ,, i know people laugh at em ,, but from what i have been reading they are like an affordable futaba ,, lol ,, love my radiolink for sure
@ProjectMockingbird6 жыл бұрын
Well produced, shot and great content guys! Fun, informative and not taking things too seriously. Thumbs up 👍
@Fungineers4 жыл бұрын
As a Radiolink owner, Im happy haha. Best Bang for buck, but I would still prefer a frsky for all the support, parts, external module ability, and most importantly that no RTF micros or minis ship with Radiolink protocol
@michaelcrawford49406 жыл бұрын
It has everything to do with the flying height off the ground. A stock Spektrum radio flies 3 meter gliders miles away. You should try it again at different heights, I'm guessing the long range stuff will really show it's stuff higher off the ground
@neilorourke32576 жыл бұрын
I liked this. Interesting to do a comparison between the transmitters under less-than-optimal conditions. Also the bickering between Drew and Josh is a treat!
@mmmasterscross79156 жыл бұрын
Great video. Enjoy all of you entertained me on the video. So funny. Keep the video's coming. Thanks again.
@gee4zfpv6 жыл бұрын
no matter what the temperature is a Kwad camp Detroit, I am NOT wearing shorts... no way no how... can't wait!
@matthewnoblejordan35555 жыл бұрын
I'm telling you guys. Radio link is an amazing system. You cannot beat it on 2.4 range, its also affordable and a all around dang good system. I wish more people used it. I have had it all. And I fly Radio link
@hellomyfellowfellow72106 жыл бұрын
Really funng episode. Love that part with Bardwell and Le Drib's mavic. So funny
@josh1991756 жыл бұрын
I absolutely loved the diary room side commentary, I laughed so hard and enjoyed the episode much more than I usually do which is saying something. All the guys are awesome I love them all. Great episode, keep up the great work
@maffettastic6 жыл бұрын
This was a good one ! Keep it up guys !
@Vaughnboilore6 жыл бұрын
Great video guys!i always love watching you fools together hanging out,please keep um coming! Take care. Michigan love from OCD-FPV
@thomascee6 жыл бұрын
Wow Kapper! Nice chang-up on the format! Loved the Bardwell touch. Really added another dimension to it. A++
@chilllaxish6 жыл бұрын
It´s just Tommy coming up at mach f*ck! Best expression ever!
@dronereviewman95806 жыл бұрын
The answer everyone wants to know!!! Lol great post!!!! THIS WAS GREAT!!
@untamed-fpv57156 жыл бұрын
AT9 Radiolink i have one .wanted to see that for so long 😁 it is a great radio just wish it would talk .
@flyt1296 жыл бұрын
I have a Radiolink AT9S and really really liked it. There are very nice receivers like the R12DSM for it with great range. But in the end I switched to the Taranis Q X7 because of the native telemetry support. If there would be a native telemtry support in the FCs for Radiolink without the stupidtly big extra Radiolink telemtry module, I would go back.
@dizzyfpv49036 жыл бұрын
Glad Tommy tested the FLYEYE 🤪 🤣😂🤣
@Fincky6 жыл бұрын
That was a really fun episode 😊
@shaunburtney78166 жыл бұрын
love how this was edited. such a great episode guys. great content and great people in the vid. thanks rotor riot. keep doing what you do.
@BradSolov4 жыл бұрын
Published on my birthday, I'm glad I'm not the only Spektrum holdout...
@skynet8596 жыл бұрын
There are indeed some in our local group who glue their antennas to the arms. And the next time we have to search one of these in the field... "Dude, either you place your antennas right or you could fly spectrum as well. It's #teamfailsafe anyway"
@jessebrown14026 жыл бұрын
I love that Bardwell is repping a Botgrinder shirt
@ImperialArmour Жыл бұрын
Watching this 5 years later, I would say the hobby progressed more in the direction of science, but it can be better still.