Vote Democrat or vote Republic…. I vote behind Vallied/Valued/Viewer Party….

@@FinFunnel68 shut up you god damn liberal in disguise

@@FinFunnel68 There isn't an American jet out there that liberals voted for, they derided all of them in industry and D.C. publications, when they were asking for budgets and all through their development, "General Dynamics' Fighting Falcon is just an American MiG-21 -- Here is why it isn't necessary or even wanted by the USAF." Same for Raptor, same for Fat Amy. If you love military aviation there is only one side that has your back... or the desire to provide the best planes and training for our aircrews.

@@debbiestimac5175 I don't know about that. Killing people is one of the few subjects as a nation we can get behind. The problem is we haven't been salting the earth of nations with air forces. Find some people that can fly and I'm sure democrats will oblige our bloodlust.

Same here.

Tbh might as well just have 2 f-15ex

Ah yes from the old History Channel's Dogfights of the future episode the Rockwell B-1R the Interceptor variant of the B-1B flies as fast as a Raptor too.

I was thinking cruise missiles as an amraam truck. Would be an expendable way to get a heap of missiles inside excellent parameters in a major air fight. They could be fired from safe ranges (for the B1/B52) and the anti aircraft missiles fired through datalink. The cruise missile could also investigate airspace where stealth aircraft are suspected to be if it had it’s own radar / could leverage the amraam’s radar.

What air force would even get near that? 8 Bones, 192 Aims?

I may have a nice surprise for you soon.

lucky the game didnt decide to crap itself during this too

You ain't seen nothing yet.

You teaze!

and now imagine that with stealth :)

It's not actually the EX, it's the stand-in C GR is using until the EX is complete.

@@ScorpionXXXVII Actually it's a stand-in F-15E model. I ought to know.

palix ciwis, sea ram's and sm-2s bascly

New meteor already made, it's VERY powerful.

lol cap would be speaker of the house lol

yup

That would be great for range without making it to heavy.

That;s why we'll redo them :)

They should have that backup option, yes. This isn't entirely indicative of where America is going with its doctrine, though. Running this mission again, but with two f-35 or NGAD data linked to the f-15s would give a very different result.

...IN A GAME

@@comediangj4955 irl missiles arent always going to work

Yup, that;s why we run these tests.

@@comediangj4955 yep and DACT is basically a real life game. Pilots wouldn’t practice WVR combat if it was redundant. Missiles can be dodged, jammed, decoyed and all the time, the merge approaches….

@@jdo8405 I don't think that is it at all, personally I think it is a Mach 5 missile with a maximum range of about 180 miles... just wonder why public information is being nerfed

@@jdo8405 well I think your wrong, just goin to have to wait n see👍

In terms of development, we are non-profit, we just concentrate on making what we want. No $. No politics. That said. It's important that we still could not do this without core game, so we must support core game and keep it alive.

yup

We noticed that there is a problem with TWS in longer ranges than 50 NM that makes missiles always miss

AIM-260 currently not programmed for TWS.

@@grimreapers ah that makes sense

ok

No. Unless it has the same ramjet way of propulsion that the meteor has, it won't have the same abilities. The meteor is legitimately a leap in performance and an engineering marvel.

@@thegreatboibruh5169 true,the JATM in only the evolution of the AMRAAM D

Yup we are already working on Raptor/F-15 sensor fusing which will allow this.

Thanks man ❤

Already got F-16/18 working with AIM-260 :)

@@grimreapers Bloody fantastic. I’ve played the game exactly once - takes up too much space that I need on MacBook for work. Enjoyed it a lot, though it was a bit slow with all the emulation. If I make enough money off my channel and books… You run some really interesting and fun scenarios. They point to some interesting Geopolitical implications, especially this one. Though I have doubts about the competency of China’s aviation sector where exceptionally complex technologies are concerned. There’s also non-traditional sensor systems. There has been some work with claimed success on Gravitic detection. I have a copy of the paper if you are interested. Those could reduce the usefulness of stealth, but not any time soon. You’ve got a fan Cap, thanks to you and the rest of the Grim Reapers for some amazing and thought provoking entertainment.

How do you figure? None of the missiles were defeated with maneuvers. All kinematics as far as I can see.

Sort of. We can adjust the weight of the missile body, which affects the manouverability.

That's how it works, we only get warnings once a fox 3 goes active. It's more humans assuming because we have fired a missile, they probably have as well, certainly for us in the J-15s we knew we were at a disadvantage so we had to be a bit more defensive minded. AI for instance only attempt to beat the missile once the missile goes Pitbull, @13.30 shows this a bit. Hope that makes sense, probably not even answered the question 😂

These modern planes have MWS which can detect missiles before they go active. Yes we can turn them off.

Because it's got artificial INTELLIGENCE. 🤦‍♂️

Once the victim detects the missile's radar then they perform standardised anti-missile manouvers based on their skill level. Same way a human will defend.

Yup

Way ahead of you Tony :)

Case in point - at 13:28 you described a missile as going "at about Mach 2", when it was 30,000ft and doing 1513kn. At that altitude in a standard atmosphere, the temperature would be -44.5 degrees C, which would make Mach equal to 589kn, meaning the missile was doing closer to 2.56 Mach.

Agreed, but it's too complex to compute "on the fly" so I just use rough averages when speaking on the vids.

@@grimreapers Yeah - I'm just nitpicking I guess. Still love the videos. 🙂