That's the only way it works in my opinion. It's requires ideas and input .

So glad you found it helpful!

yo

Most probably it was all created by AI 😅. In these new ERA (Era of AI) you can't be sure if something is created by humans or not.

No it wasn’t 🤦

Dissertations can be 40k words 🤯😿🧌

​@@AlexanderFYoung That's phenomenal...I was a drop out unfortunately and chose a different path...how long was your dissertation? I remember friends working on theirs for months in their final year

You can make it

actually school

Not really. Only if you don’t understand what the AI is doing. It’s basically a low paid employee

@@ProgrammingWIthRiley I added this comment a month ago. Things are already changing fast in terms of essay quality.

@@zzzaaayyynnnCould you please elaborate? I have never used AI but I’m interested.

@@orlandoevansministriestv5740 AI is used in all types of apps now as a limited, focused type of "intelligence." You use it without knowing it. ChatGPT and the apps that have followed are another level. They seem to "think" even though there is no consciousness.

OpenAI shuts down a tool meant to detect AI-written text due to low accuracy. - The Verge

Input that into the chatbot

@@darlamckinnon4546 This is what I put for my introduction The idea of allowing children the opportunity to vote has been around for generations, In Athens, for example, all the male population, regardless of age were allowed to vote. On the other hand, it was not until the early 20th century that most nations commenced to decrease the polling age to 21. In contrast it was not until the 1970s that certain states such as Canada and Australia, minimized their voting age to 18. There are a number of disagreements in respect to presenting children with an opportunity to vote. One of the arguments is that children are residents of their country just as adults are, therefore, children should have a discussion in how their country is driven. Another argument is that children are more likely to be briefed about political affairs compared to adults, because children are more likely to be unmasked to stories and ongoing occurrences in school. Finally, some people argue that providing children with the right to vote would help to educate them about democracy and national commitment. A number of investigations have been conducted on this subject and the outcome is mixed. Some research that had been constructed showed that children as young as 6 or 7 years old are able to understand the fundamental theories of voting, such as two differences between applicants and casting a vote, However other research that had been found showed that children below the age of 12 and 13 are not yet able to recognise the steps that are involved in voting including the economic and social consequences of various policies. (Mitra, 2009)

*The following text was written solely by ChatGPT:* Title: Embracing AI in Academic Writing: A Pedagogical Revolution Introduction: Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, I stand before you today to advocate for a transformative shift in our approach to education - the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the process of academic paper writing. As we navigate the ever-evolving landscape of higher education, it is essential to adapt and leverage modern technologies to enhance learning outcomes. In this essay, I will present a compelling case for why we, as college professors, should consider allowing students to utilize AI for paper writing. 1. Empowering Student Learning: AI-powered writing tools can serve as valuable supplements to traditional pedagogical methods. By using AI, students can receive real-time feedback on grammar, style, and coherence, empowering them to improve their writing skills progressively. This not only enhances their academic performance but also equips them with essential communication skills that are vital in today's world. 2. Enhancing Efficiency: As educators, we understand the challenges of grading a large number of papers. AI can significantly reduce the burden by assisting in preliminary assessments, such as identifying plagiarism, grading grammar, and providing suggestions for improvements. This allows us to focus on providing more personalized and insightful feedback to our students. 3. Encouraging Critical Thinking: Contrary to concerns that AI may promote laziness, it can, in fact, stimulate critical thinking. When students use AI tools, they have more time to delve deeper into research, analysis, and interpretation of data. It encourages them to think critically about the content they are producing, as they are freed from some of the mechanical aspects of writing. 4. Promoting Inclusivity: AI can level the playing field for students with diverse linguistic backgrounds and learning abilities. It provides additional support to non-native English speakers, those with learning disabilities, or students who may face challenges in expressing their ideas through conventional writing. By embracing AI, we foster inclusivity and ensure that all students have an equal opportunity to succeed. 5. Preparing for the Future: In today's digital age, AI is becoming increasingly integral to various professions. Exposing students to AI tools early in their academic journey equips them with skills that are relevant in the job market. This prepares them for a future where AI-assisted writing is the norm in many industries. Conclusion: In conclusion, the integration of AI in academic paper writing offers numerous advantages. It empowers students, lightens the grading load on educators, fosters critical thinking, promotes inclusivity, and prepares students for the future job market. As college professors, we have a responsibility to adapt our teaching methods to the evolving needs of our students and society. Embracing AI in education is a step towards achieving that goal. Let us consider the potential benefits it holds and work together to explore its full potential as a powerful tool in our educational arsenal.

let me ask you this question: you want to go to destination B which is X miles away but some else tells you that you have to walk there and can't use a car. How would that make you feel? Are you going to walk or are you going to make your case that driving is better?

Well instead of assigning 30 essays per semester you should assign only 10 or so so that the students actually have time to use their skills 😂

Because you just treat universities as vocational schools. But unfortunately that’s a trend nowadays.