Could God make a burrito so hot he cannot eat it? If he can make such a dish then he cannot eat it. This means he is not omnipotent. If he cannnot make this dish then he is simply not omnipotent. Conclusion: gawd is no omnipotent. He is also an asshole and has been missing for quite a long time now (forever).

@@ericlyprendi4325 you need help to understand how STUPID your comment is. It's a self defeating statement which indicates a lack of intelligents, knowledge and a GREAT need for an EDUCATION. May God bless and enlighten you before it's too late.

Eric God can do all things that are logically possible dimwit! Your analogy is a logical Impossibility. But there is no gap because it is not needed. The belief that the world is ancient is a secular fantasy the evidence fights against it like Palomium halos in rock structures etc etc. the moons distance from earth etc etc!

@@gerardmoloney9979 , do you see the irony in you misspelling intelligence?

@@ericlyprendi4325 God surpasses logic you know.

Jesus didn't "create" anything that day - He just RE-ALIGNED atoms in order to feed so MANY with so LITTLE to begin with.

It was MORE than 5000. Reread that.

@@scharf74 Well aware of that ..

@@71superbee39 But you said 5000. Typical. Ignoring all the women and children and the women COOKED the fish.

LOL...the number 5000 is a general scriptural reference, try taking that chip off your shoulder...No offense was meant...

That sounds like a genuine miracle. To bad you god lets all those children die terrible deaths every single day. If only you werent so selfish that you would pray for those poor children. You are a monster.

I read it, and actually gained a couple of perspectives that I hadn't thought of, thanks!

in the beginning god created the heavens and the earth most young and old earth believers consider this to mean heaven was made before the earth how long before the earth who knows we also know the earth was a void made mostly of water before the days of creation

Yes, very thought-provoking. Check out Jeremiah 4:23-26, which is Scofield's source for his gap theory view. What do you make of that?

@@dwightropp3014 I think that it is always important to keep the text within the context of the chapter and book. Chapter 4 of Jeremiah is a prophecy of judgement on Israel and verses 23 --26 are part of the description of the desolation God would bring on the land. " Jeremiah 4:20 Destruction upon destruction is cried; for the whole land is spoiled: suddenly are my tents spoiled, and my curtains in a moment. 21 How long shall I see the standard, and hear the sound of the trumpet? 22 For my people is foolish, they have not known me; they are sottish children, and they have none understanding: they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge. 23 I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light. 24 I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly. 25 I beheld, and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled. 26 I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD, and by his fierce anger. 27 For thus hath the LORD said, The whole land shall be desolate; yet will I not make a full end. 28 For this shall the earth mourn, and the heavens above be black: because I have spoken it, I have purposed it, and will not repent, neither will I turn back from it."

Great post. I recently was introduced to old earth creationism, and for me, it is where all the pieces of the puzzle started to fit together. I have watched both sides of the teachings and I have to admit that both sides have to jump through some serious hoops for their side to be correct. For me, evolution does not even come into play in this conversation, as these positions were held long before Darwinism. I tend to fall on the old earth side, as I said earlier, it ties all the pieces together. Too much of the early earth side of the argument ask me to not believe what is in front of my eyes or what is in the historic record. During my many years of being a Christian, I am always and will always be a Bible-first Christian. If you can't defend something with scripture, then I know it comes from man and that makes me question it. What seals it for me is the stories of Lucifer's fall. I think that most Christians would say they believe that Lucifer was removed from Heaven before the creation of Adam. When the Biblical text states that Lucifer was cast down before Kings, well, if there are kings, there are kingdoms. It also states that Lucifer was dishonest with his trading. Who was Lucifer trading with on Earth? All this before the creation of Adam. The old earth theory also helps archeology fit into its proper place. Things like the List of Sumerian Kings, where they list kings that ruled for thousands and tens of thousands of years. The young earth theory does not allow room for some archeology. I find that the old earth theory allows me to believe ALL that the Bible says.

🤣🤣🤣

LOLOLOLOLOLOL!

How can a woman who couldn't keep her house in order form invent a religion?

Well said, we were taught that back in Sunday school in the 50's and 60's.

Most ministers will not teach the truth.

James Edwin but how about Genesis 2:7 were it says that the Farther formed man from the dust of the earth and breath life into him? But he also created man back on day six, Genesis 1:27. So what is the difference between the two? Well the text reads that the first man was a hunter-gathers.With mastery of the animals he had created, the eighth day man was a husbandmen with mastery of the plants that he had created. And put him in the garden of edan. So maybe our Farther wasn't finished after the sixth day.

@@jessetwo1 ......you have to look at what's called a "recap" of events, or a re-telling of chapter one. Genesis 2:4 KJV These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens,

Keith Lucas I see how you can come to that conclusion with the limitations of the KJV, however if go back to the original Hebrew manuscripts you will find that there is a distinct difference between the two.The first being a hunter-gathers, Genesis 1:26. Genesis 1: 27 ......created He "him ; male and female created He them. In Genesis 2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground and breath into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. Then God put him in charge of taking care of the plant life, gave him the knowledge to cultivate plants. But did not create his help meet until Genesis 2: 21. Now if Our Heavenly Farther had already crated one single type of man and women that could do everything both hunting -gathering and the caretaker of plants; husbandmen then they're would be no reason to write about the two separately at two different times.

In both Exodus 20:11 and Exodus 31:17 the Hebrew word for make is asah a common word for make or fashion out of something. In Genesis 1:1 the word for create is Bara. I think a study of the difference between those two words will shed some light on the confusion here. Bara is usually used when God does something entirely new. Bara is used in Exodus 34:10 when God creates a covenant for instance or in Joshua when he tells a tribe to create a settlement where there wasn't one.

@@mrsoulfoot3927 I understand what you are saying, but that doesn't change the fact that we speculate to much on things that don't matter. Like i said, just believe what it says and don't speculate! It's writen 4 times at least that God made everything in 6 days and on the seventh day He rested, why can't we just accept that and finish trying to fit the evolution religion into the Bible?

because our translations are, in some respects generally accepted speculations. unfortunately. and if what we speculate about scripture doesn't agree with other scripture then it is our speculations that much change as the scripture is unchanging.

@@mrsoulfoot3927 Ok... Whatever... God bless you.

Yes read the words in the Bible for what it says, for it says God made us, in his image on the sixth day,and finished earth on the seventh day,no one brings this up,as known one day is a thousand years in the Bible ,if people would look for truth and knowledge everywhere, instead of from one book,a more complete truth would arise, for we traveled the universe on that sixth day for a thousand years as God told us to go see what he has created and learn and come back to me and tell me your thoughts,and then we asked to come here on Earth,there is a whole lot more to us then any one book can hold, know who you are,a soul of Love and Light straight from Father, God, the Creator of all things,this body we're in,is not what we are,we are so much more, have to know that there's truth every where and deception with it,as any one religion has deception in it also, when Christ came to wake up and save us, the ultimate deceiver didn't just go away ,he made his way into everything after to deceive the world,as he has done so very well,as I hear, still "everything written in this book is the word of God" silly ,as I read Exodus an Moss's is sprinkling blood on the children, it sounds to me like that's the first teachings of satanism,the first satanic ritual, that would episode just sounds wrong to me, for in scripture it says to seek truth and knowledge and you will know, that doesn't mean look in one place and by the know,you are from the one that created everything,so you will know from inside yourself the truth, you can feel the truth,seek and it will be shown,ask and it will be told,for it you walk with God,our holy Father,then fear no evil, for if you think it evil, question it,for evil has no power over you, I've gotten my knowledge from being woken up, born again, and started seeking knowledge, because I knew nothing about religions, church, or God, four years in and I know who I am and where I come from, for Father tell's me people I should help,leads me on my path, amazing journey much Love to you all, keep seeking

It does start with the first day though. Don't rape Scripture to fit naturalistic thinking.

You need some help with reading scripture.

LOL. God doesn't have a beginning. Thus, WHATEVER He began to do, was the beginning. If He had begun with black holes and white holes, it would still be called "the beginning." In this case, He began the universe from this focal point.

That's a very mature statement, so many of us take the word of god and our origin extremely seriously and clash with eachother instead of working together

So you domt think it matters? Brother or sister it does. Do you know how many souls will never meet God because they beleve ths deception about a ball earth and evolution. Nothing else on history has turn more people away from our creator than this deception. And this pastor wont admit our Bible is clear about what we live on. Hes part of the problem

@@nchan4679 buddy, All we need is to believe Jesus is the son of God and he paid the price of our inequity on the cross and he rose from the grave.... outside of that, God the Father does not care, so long as your sin debt is covered.

@@nchan4679 Even when men thought for thousands of years that the world was flat, they still rejected Jesus. So how exactly this Flat Earth movement going to cause them to believe in Jesus now? Its as it always has been. People reject Jesus when they love their sin too much to part with it.

Very mature comments OB

Yes, lets stick with what the Bible says, In 2 of the major prophets, God says He did not create the earth without form and void. In Genesis 1 Adam is told to re-plenish the earth. I believe re means do it again. In Genesis 1 Adam is male and female and brought into being from nothing, but in Genesis 2 ha Adam is fashioned out of the dust of the ground, and Isha is brought out of Ish. The teacher seems to have forgotten Jesus dealing with "demons", some kind of being of energy that has no body, what are they and where did they come from.

But fallen angels entered man to procreated with women. And that is how the nephillim came into being.

demons are the spirits of nephilim, and they are not the breath of God, they are the seed of the fallen ones, and of female humans, and they are bound to this planet. They "entreated" J esus to enter the swine after He cast them out of the madman of Gadera. Entreated is a legal term, also, Jesus walked thru the territories that Joshua and the tribes of Israel never conquered, and took authority over those areas. the same areas currently occupied by the Palestinians (aka the Philistines)

No, Michelle is right, the Benoi Elohim in Genesis 6 are not Nephilim, they are fallen angels that left their first estate and took a different form. opposite of Believers in Christ, we will be changed from a corrupted form to an incorruptible form. Kind of like Nicholas Cage did in the movie City of Angels, where he cast himselfdown and took on flesh in order to be with Meg Ryan playing a doctor, who then proceeds to get killed, thwarting Nick's plan. Angels possessed Judas, Satan is a fallen angel, and he also possessed Annanias & Sophira. He had some kind of control over Peter because Jesus spoke to Peter and said get behind me Satan, he called Peter Satan, so something was a little odd.Angels do more than influence, they were wiping people out at times during the time of Elisha, 1 angel killed 185,000 Assyrians. That's a bad ass angel, one you want to be friends with.

Blue is it Genisis 6 where the sons of God came down to procreate with women. How would they have done that without the parts?

@@worldgonemad5866 You mean the knowledge of man?

@@dukeshoots5296 , that's exactly what I mean. Until someone demonstrates a God noone can genuinely claim to receive knowledge for such a being. All knowledge is man's knowledge.

But création matches up with évolution if you look at it

@@raicarroceralopez6430, no it doesnt, not even close. Creationists say that god magically created everything on a whim. Thst is not at all what evolution says. Stop equivocating the two mutually exclusive ideas.

G Mil amen and amen

What us the spirit of truth? Sounds like a a useless platitude.

Ok so we are not sure about Gen but Zeck 14 FEAST OF TABERNACLES 3x YESHUA HIGH ANNUAL SABBATHS 3x it is written but we would rather strain at knats ( go after the minite smallest detail) and ecnore the larger 3x is written but false teachers dont teach this And No more Caninite pagan xmas tree Jer 10:3 HE is RESIN not on pagan crucifix was buried beforee PASSOVER ( HIS HIGH ANNUAL SABBATH) full 3 days and full 3 nights in the grave ( as Jonah) reserced on wkly SABBATH evening no glory to pagan sun worship day kjv 1 403 830 4124

@@worldgonemad5866 spirit of truth is a decent way of slipping in the importance of truth in growing spiritually. I mean how cool are you though?

@@coyotebones1131 , you didnt answer the question, son.

yes pleas ohh lord! im lost without you!

The "young earth" view isn't the issue here, though. We all believe that is true, including Scofield and Larkin and Pember, etc. The issue is the "gap theory"--that long stretch of time they say is wedged in between verses 1 and 2. Scofield based his view on Jeremiah 4:23-26, which does provide a conundrum for us. Mr. Barnett didn't speak of this matter.

@@dwightropp3014 Context ! Jer 4:23-26 taken out of context, that is why Barnett did not comment on that, and all are wrong, in ky humble opinion.

@@ronaldgerritsen6789 - Yes, as I’ll explain, I have come to be satisfied that it doesn’t speak of a creation gap. And yes, I am well aware that the context of Jeremiah 4:1-22 is of the chastisement of rebellious Israel to the point of her being engulfed in war. But the only time we read that the earth was ever “void and without form” (v.23), is in Genesis 1:2, which has caused some confusion for some folks. But then reading in verse 26 that the “fruitful land was a wilderness, and all its cities were broken down,” we should then realize that it must speak of humankind and civilization having already existed, which then rules out Gen-1:2 being the intended time frame. Rather, as some commentators have viewed it, the phrase “void and without form” is being used in Jeremiah 4 to describe a reversal of creation of sorts due to Israel’s sin, resulting in its society being erased in the land as they were carried away into the Babylonian captivity or even later at the destruction of Jerusalem in AD-70, resulting in the fruitfulness of the land ceasing to exist…until 1948, of course.

@@dwightropp3014 It’s human conjecture (man made theory) about the long span of time aka ‘gap’ between Genesis 1-2. Pastor Barnett said there is nothing in the Bible that confirms that theory. Since we all know man is flawed and has limited brain/mind capacity along with a sinful nature of ego/pride, and the Bible is God’s infallible, inerrant Word from an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent being- we must always use His Word over man’s as the standard or barometer of truth and fact.

So all this extra gravity measured in the universe is just the weight of sin/evil in his holy creation?

They have found the huge remains and the huge heads. The larger ones were as big as the length of the Ark...Study and see

There is no way for inserting a gap theory in Genesis 1.1 because the first verse is about the 2 bookends that reveal the beginning of the first earth and also the end of the first earth according to Revelation 21.1, and further to firmly witness that truth, Isaiah 46.10 declares that God has revealed the end from the beginning. Genesis 1:1-2 > In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. "And the earth was without form, and void;" and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. Isaiah 46:10 > "Declaring the end from the beginning", and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: Revelation 21:1 > And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: "for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away;" and there was no more sea.

If only God had given us any sort of communication to understand, like verbal stories that could have been written down. If only.

God did give us a lot of scripture that has not been expounded upon. It is there for those who truly study with a pure heart and do not try to force their own agenda/beliefs. He did promise us a remnant that would bring forth his truth and He has done that. I thank Him for that remnant, it has allowed my knowledge and understanding to grow.

@@jpaul1599 , to bad genisis is completely wrong about the formation of the earth. Its not even close to how things actually unfolded.

Cavemen is the invention of people wanting to believe in evolution and deep time. Humans were smart as modern people from the start of Adam and Eve

timothy ricketts if we are talking about God then it can't happen instantly the seed can be planted and it could grow right there , all things are possible with God you know

Any evidence that plants can grow instantly? Or is it just a fancy story that helps make your favorite fairy tales make a little more sence?

, a song as your feeling are validated that's what's important.

Agreed but it is fascinating :)

Of course it matters hugely. either we are descended from apes, or we are sinners descended from Adam and Eve, and in need of salvation.

@@chhmar99utube Yes it do matter. I'm afraid of people that will follow anything on blind faith.

The Hebrew word is expanse firmament was a Greek mistranslation.

It can't be. They are as close as it appears. Anywhere from 40 to 70 miles up, depending on where their Analemma has them. The sun is a laser light focal point and the moon is a concave reflection off of the illuminated, center ice nodule beneath the ice dome, tent firmament, like a solid beaten work. I see it as the sea of glass described in prophecy. There is NO ball account of the earth and sea in the bible. But all of the description are contrary to the Heliocentric module of the Roman Universal Church. They worship Helios as the sun god.

A watchmen what kind of drugs are you on?

@@krakoosh1 , strong ones.

@@faithtruth8036 , faith truth, kind of an oxymoron dont you think?

2Pe 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day

Ya, he does a real great job of slap chopping Satan's lies with God's Truth... And I know I can't convince anyone of anything without God's help (which might be the very source of my own ingratitude)... Anyhow. it is not a mystery to me anymore why Dr. Ross avoids the Anthropic implications of a gravitational singularity, when he had so much to say about the anthropic implications of all other worldly knowledge... By the time the reader figures it out for themselves, they will have wasted a great deal of time and be on the verge of being lost. Better just stick to God's Word.

Dr Hugh Ross believes the universe, and earth are billions of years old. He does not believe that creation was an act of six literal 24 hour days, but rather six days that covered a period of time lasting billions of years. He debates Dr Jason Lisle concerning this on KZfaq. I recently watched part of it.

the Universe and Heliocentric ball earth are Satanic LIES by Satan. over 200 Bible verses supports a Flat and Stationary world💯🧠

I am not a fan of Dr Ross or his ideas. There is a lot, and I mean A LOT, of bad teaching floating around in the American 'church'.

I looked and nope. No gap.

@robert proctor Wow! Maybe you should do a self diagnosis. So, I disagree on the gap theory and you claim I am en-route to hell. But just because I am so humble, let me check one more time...nope, still no gap nonsense.

They lie most of the time, we are told not to conversate with them.

@@david84ss They don't lie some of the time , but all the time.Are you kidding me.

@@richardk6025 they mix truth with lies which can make them even more deceptive.

Who was Joseph's father? Jacob or Heli? Mathew 1:16 vs Luke 3:23

@@brianmcbrayer2528 I could be wrong but it sounded as if Sketchpad Warrior was joking.

Not sure why we need a gap? There’s plenty evidence for there being no gap. It’s a secular belief people are trying to justify a gap. But it’s just not necessary!

@@terryfonz4603 I disagree

L.G. - Gap theory that "so called" theologians have pushed is nonsense. Genesis 1:1-2 actually contains the book-ends of history of this, the First Earth that we live on. - Beginning of 1st earth - Genesis 1:1 > In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. End of 1st earth - Genesis 1:2 > And the earth was without form, and void. (The end of 1st creation and 1st earth is exactly what God confirmed through Isaiah.) Isaiah 46:10 > "Declaring the end from the beginning", and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: (The finality of end of 1st earth ) Revelation 21:1 > And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: "for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away;"

@@jpaul1599 Yes we still live on the 1st Earth. But just as God "destroyed" the world with Noah's flood, He may have done it between Gen 1:1 - 1:2. The word "was" in in Gen 1:2 in the Hebrew could mean became in English. I really don't know, I wasn't there 6000 yrs ago. But the cosmos and the geology scream old Earth, old universe. Could God have made them appear old? Of course, but since He doesn't clearly state that He created the universe 6000 yrs ago (imho), I'm a little less dogmatic on this issue.

@@l.g.7169 - So was the Holy Spirit inspired Isaiah 46:10 lying when he wrote that "Declaring the end from the beginning", and from ancient times the things that are not yet done ...

@@jpaul1599 Where did I say that? God cannot lie! In my view, "Declaring the end from the beginning" means just what it says, God knew everything that will ever happen, ie every thought word or action from everyone, be they angel, human or demon; before He created anything. That's what prophesy is.

L.G. The speakers says, early in the video, that there are several versions of the gap theory.

Isa 45:18...thus saith the Lord that created the heavens, God himself that formed the earth and Kade it, he hath established it, he created li not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited. I the Lord and none else..

@@LOWIQ-1 Gap theory that "so called" theologians have pushed is nonsense. Genesis 1:1-2 actually contains the book-ends of history of this, the First Earth that we live on. - Beginning of 1st earth - Genesis 1:1 > In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. End of 1st earth - Genesis 1:2 > And the earth was without form, and void. (The end of 1st creation and 1st earth is exactly what God confirmed through Isaiah.) Isaiah 46:10 > "Declaring the end from the beginning", and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: (The finality of end of 1st earth ) Revelation 21:1 > And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: "for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away;"

Josue Urizar - please read the KJV 1611 Bible - it states in Isaiah 45:18 > For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else. Modern day bibles have been deliberately chipping into the Word of God to make spurious theologies. If you believe the Bible to be the Word of God and Isauah 46:10 states Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: Now ask yourself the question - where has God revealed the end from the beginning but in Genesis 1:1-2 ??? The Gap theory is an invention by certain theologians to cause believers to doubt the authenticity of the 6 day creation account of Genesis. Why does it say "first earth" passed away if it is a recreated earth or a second earth ??? in Revelation 21:1 > And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: "for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away;" Trust the Word fully not doubt it. The Faith is being sabotaged from within just as Christ was betrayed by an insider Judas. Shalom.

The bible is wrong.

Wow. You read my mind. I don't think I've ever met anyone who thinks like this. Thank you. We'll have to hook up in eternity for more discussion. I truly believe we will be studying scripture, forever. Layers upon layers of lines upon lines and precepts upon precepts. Won't that be fun.

Charles Sirisky - Gap theory that "so called" theologians have pushed is nonsense. Genesis 1:1-2 actually contains the book-ends of history of this, the First Earth that we live on. - Beginning of 1st earth - Genesis 1:1 > In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. End of 1st earth - Genesis 1:2 > And the earth was without form, and void. (The end of 1st creation and 1st earth is exactly what God confirmed through Isaiah.) Isaiah 46:10 > "Declaring the end from the beginning", and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: (The finality of end of 1st earth ) Revelation 21:1 > And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: "for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away;"

You didn't watch this, did you? Blessings :-)

@@henryv4222 I hardly watch anything with a misleading title such as yours. Trying to fit your opinion hardly works.nice to have that spirit in me.

@@gumbyspoke5891 ad hominems are not from the Spirit.

And yet the KJV Old Testament was based on the Masoretic Texts which clearly took away from the Septuagint, the writings that were around at the time of Christ and quoted from by the disciples. Find a quote in the KJV NT and compare it to the KJV OT, then compare it to the Septuagint. Not even the heralded KJV is free from man's despicable hands.

that's a appeal of emotion

There's an Australian Christian scientist that has been saying that for some time. Time travelled faster at the beginning of Creation and has been slowing down since. It is winding down.

John Hunter - watch KZfaq video "Kings Dethroned (Audio)" - the whole modern day "speed of light from the celestial bodies and the distances to them are rigged.

The garden was in the sky to create angels, and after the garden was in earth to be a house for Adam.

Is that quote from someone?

Gap theory that "so called" theologians have pushed is nonsense. Genesis 1:1-2 actually contains the book-ends of history of this, the First Earth that we live on. - Beginning of 1st earth - Genesis 1:1 > In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. End of 1st earth - Genesis 1:2 > And the earth was without form, and void. (The end of 1st creation and 1st earth is exactly what God confirmed through Isaiah.) Isaiah 46:10 > "Declaring the end from the beginning", and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: (The finality of end of 1st earth ) Revelation 21:1 > And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: "for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away;"

What we have to look at is the word darkness and void and how it was used in the scriptures elsewhere. Also God created the world to be fit to live in!

I think you need to look a bit deeper.

Where in Hebrews does it states that?

, which god is that and how did you determine that this god exists?

@@worldgonemad5866 I figured it out the worst way a guy can figure it out... And that was by myself and on my own terms...It's funny, nobody taught me how to believe or the importance in doing so... I tried teaching myself, but things never seemed to add up. After awhile, the Lord mercifully allowed me to see what I've been up against... And you know the funny part, knowing it's all true doesn't seem to help as much as I thought it would have. It just gives me more questions and a greater sense of doom than I'd ever had previously. I read my Bible aloud alone, pray, and do my best... He'll is pretty rough and I'd prefer not ending up there.

@@jimvick8397 , so what convinced you a god is real? "By myself on my own terms" is not any explanation at all. Maybe you had a fever dream while 'jesus christ superstar' was on PBS on TV. Maybe it's because you were raised on a Christian culture? Maybe you actually have evidence that a God exists. If a god really does exist I'd like to know, seems like that would be pretty important info.

That's funny how you presume to know anything about me and put words in my mouth. It reminds me of when I tried to share the Lord with my sister and an evil spirit began rattling off (much like you are now) through her boyfriend who she has been shacked up with for 15 years. It funny how the devil's God allows to blind us demand the evidence... When its the one thing God doesn't want at all... The Lord wants me to work on my anger and manners, so He can use me for more than an asswipe. He is the one who changes hearts and minds...

@@jimvick8397 , so you aren't interested in telling me what convinced you that a God exists? Ok. That has nothing to do with the devil..

That a perfect example of special pleading. Its not like the primative peoples that wrote the bible made any mistakes in their creation myths. That would just be crazy.

Gods creation? You must first demonstrate that a god exists before you can call anything a creation.

@@worldgonemad5866 God exists and so do gods. I hope you do not think everything came from nothing. 0+0 always equals 0

@@worldgonemad5866 ok , take God out of it and base it on physics . Even science has given up singing the evolution song. Look into quantum physics and see where that goes.

@@mattusezhe9055 , biologists have not given up on the theory of evolution. I dont know which creationists told you that, but i wouldnt repeat it if i were you. You may as well tell me about your pet unicorn.

@@mattusezhe9055, im not sure what caused the universe to come into existence. That is the only honest position.

len raf Wrong.

len raf HERE...I’LL USE ALL CAPS...WRONG. There. Settled.

Are you Scott or Henny Youngman? What's with the one word replies?

A building which was built 50 years ago and was damaged by a fire, can be restored. It is the SAME building which was built 50 years ago. The Earth which was created in Genesis 1:1, is the same Earth which was restored in Genesis 1:3, 31. It's the same "first Earth" with a different world on it.

Sure it does. You just refuse to accept it. Genesis 1:1. God created the Heaven and the Earth. Genesis 1:2. And the Earth was (became) without form and void. Genesis 1:3. God begins the restoration process. See It's all there. And the scriptures says "These are the GENERATIONS (plural) not "history" as this guy claims....of the Heavens and the Earth. You just can't see it because you have been taught to look at it the wrong way

The formless and void reference does not mean the Earth was created wrong. It just means that God had not completely formed it yet. In fact from the description of the third day activities, it seems that the Earth was originally a water planet (covered in water), which is somewhat formless, no? Anyway, I wouldn't want to be the one who has to answer to God about re-translating His word. I think the King James crew did a wonderful job.

What a wishy washy world we have created. Firstly, there is no original Hebrew text in existence. The Hebrew text you refer to is from around 1000 AD, called the Massoretic text, found in Alexandria. I do not consider the NIV a valid translation, and certainly not its footnotes. I will continually be adamant about the Lord's Word. And I would like you to tell me what defects there are in the KJV.

jan zizka What does the creation of Angels have to do with this? God doesn't mention the creation of Mars either. So what? I'd say He pretty much covered everything in the fourth commandment: (Exodus 20:11) "For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it."

Jesse Wittman the original was....but some translation errors do exist unfortunately