Thank you so much! 🙌🏻

Is my boy Joe Cherries the best man?

Yeah, leaving the biggest threat in play can put the pressure on someone else to take it out

You scared all the threats away! 😂

⁠@@NitpickingNerdsI think mid range strats prefer the 1for 1 in order help build board having the addition 3 or 4 mana on turn 5 or 6. Then again the versatile ones are normally auto includes!

Sounds like a meta decision. 😂

Not bad for a 5 cent card! It kills stuff and allows you to draw stuff? I looked at this card i was like… why is this underrated?

EZ GAME

Or... Step 1: Play Skittles. Step 2: Have perfect hand. Step 3: T1 Swamp, Sol Ring, Plague Myr Step 4: T2 Swamp, Skittles. Step 5: Your opponents are either dead or concede on T4 because you have a 6/6 menace Skittles, and your game took 3 minutes.

These spells absolutely CLEAN HOUSE!

So what would swords do to that player? Still only hitting one permanent. The players should also understand that removal is a part of the game. Good bye smothering tithe

Politic more. Unexpected absence says "up to one" so you don't have to hinder the player who's doing nothing. Make an example allows players to make piles of 0 cards, you can make it so your ally sacs nothing. I like these a lot bc they give you flexibility of how much you actually want to eliminate from the table whereas board wipes are just indiscriminate. I gave up on 1 for 1s bc no one else played removal at my table. It gets old using everything you have to stop the powerful deck, just to lose once the "smol bean" durdle deck finally turns on at turn 11 and you're out of resources...at least with cards like this you can keep things in check without necessarily pissing off each opp equally

It’s going to be 🔥

Enough value for a full 3-for-1!

Plus Phyrexian Purge is a 100% wombo combo with Sangromancer

I love it in my rocco street chef deck, I target a food and get something for 3 while get rid of 3 threats and 4 total rocco triggers

Yeesh 😭 opponents probably get sick of that reeeal quick

@@NitpickingNerds it has only happened once, but its not as bad as copying peer into the abyss!

Grixis you can sit with big bombs in your hand and just wait and see if anyone does something you don't like

Queen Marchesa plays a lot like that for me

We’re with you!

Excellent guess tho

@ 8:25 ish is my wager

Only problem: you have ti have targets for all 4 categories. If no enchantment is on the table you cant cast decimate

It’s very strong for three mana, plus it has the eight mana uncounterable mode!

@@NitpickingNerds every time I play it it’s bonkers even if I’m only getting 2 mana rocks in addition to something big like a doubling season that’s still 2 mana rocks off the table

@@manasplained people will posture about their rocks not mattering, but they’ll usually be REALLY disrupted if you take them out

@@NitpickingNerds another great removal spell that will make people hate you is volcanic offering

In that scenario druid of purification would be reclamation safe for 1 more mana that gets around shroud, hexproof and protection from [color]

Gaining all your opponents a bunch of life isn't a winning strategy, especially that late in the game

Its like when you grab a drill or electric screw driver and dont "Veep Veep" to make sure its working correctly.

@@lostphotographs3936 Exactly

If you're saying you ***have to*** hit one of your own things, the part you're missing is the "...up to...". The option to do so is there, but if you don't have some worthless token to trade for a cloaked card, exiling 0 target nonland permanents you (or any other player, for that matter) control satisfies the requirement of exiling "up to 1" nonland permanent from each player.

@@LudwigMajordomo thought I had replied to this. Just noticed I didn’t. You are correct. I completely missed it. Thanks man.

Hello

We bought a bunch as well, we're gonna need it for like four decks each!

Because it kind of stinks. How often are there 3 threats controlled by different players on the field? Almost never, because if there was 3 things that needed to die the game has gone completely off the rails; no one has removal? No one has been killed by these threats? The threats don't keep each other in check? Most of the time this card is going to take out 1 real threat and 2 things that are fairly irrelevant. The dream scenario of taking out 3 actual threats will rarely come up. Taking out 1 real threat for 4 mana is a bad deal.

@@NitpickingNerds damn I got a nitpicking nerds reply. I feel special ❤️

​@@jayjayhooksch1 I haven't used it so we'll see how it shakes out but if it takes out 2 problems most of the time, and pisses off one person because their mana dork is gone, I'm happy with it

@@Zzmj975 you sure you want to be hitting mana dorks with this? ~35% of the time it's going to cloak a creature off the top. Since you presumably didn't cast this card until the mid game, you're just giving them a free shot at upgrading their mana dork. Giving a cloak is significantly worse than giving a generic token, and I think people are underestimating that.