This was really cool. Heck you could still do "2D" movies with this tech but give the director the possibility filming the scene any way he/she wants in post.

this will be great for training simulations for highly dangerous tasks/skills, and to enhance museums. being able to do a walkthrough of ancient scenes and look anywhere you want during the action...

This is the stuff of actual dreams. In the hopefully not too distant future, I could use this technology to capture a beautiful moment in my life and literally relive it time and time again. The future is gonna be absolutely wild.

I'm glad i am young and I'll be able to see how this evolves in the far future. Fascinating.

Fascinating. So many contexts where this can be used!

This is just awesome :) On a VR headset.. each & every audience can view the movie as they want to view it .. ! This is amazing :)

Great guy love his talks. This one is especially cool!

I can’t wait to see this technology evolve! Amazing!

Great work! Thank you so much.

I'm only here to know how BTS MAMA performance would be using this technology but I loved it and I got so much interest in Volumetric video capturing ❤️❤️

I imagine this technology could be used together with 'holograms' or agumented reality to create movies where you can see the action as If you we're there. You could perhaps move through a scene and watch it from different angles. I can't wait to see this develop!!!

That's incredible!

"Bullet time" all directions

Great talk Diego :)

Film as dream Film as music No art passes our conscience in the way film does And goes directly to our feelings Deep down into the dark rooms of our souls

This is my inspiration,Nice video💓💝💖

Great idea and good jobs.

7:02 Matrix4 should use this technique!

I really really love the nice tech

Brilliant! :)

Good working 👍 I hope your the best motivate for the people

For sure it will change how motion capture is... well.. captured!

The NFL should invest in this. Can you imagine being on the field during the superbowl? (Or what ever entertainment you prefer)

really nice

Exciting. Seems tho, that you’d best need a kind of *3D* Vizor/viewer to fully enjoy the immersiveness. A 2D representation - as shown in the TED video - appears to me not so much more than what we have now (except for the multiple viewing positions *in 2D*).

Amazing technology

When the new 3D came to the cinema, people used it a lot, but today it is not so popular. In the end, people still like seeing a very good 2d product more than a movie full of technology

From what little I know of related stuff, called photogrammetry, it seems like they'd have an awful lot of problems coming from not having cameras in closer, getting details from things like, for example, armpits. I expect that's why it looks so glitchy. And I don't know how they're going to fix it. But it's neat, I hope it goes well.

making a directors cut gets a whole different meaning with this technology lol

How does it perform with interiors? Do you just add more sensors to cover blind spots?

if you develop a new device just for this kind of filmmaking, maybe then you can get a higher resolution, then i would surely buy that!

Keep it up

Can't wait to see volumetric parts of a movie getting out of the Screen, while using something like the Apple Vision Pro. :)

I love watching movies. And he loves making movies.

Not for entire movie capturing..can be used in action scenes..or in the production of some special movies (YNWIM) Its great for VR..contents in future.. Also for motion capturing in vr games... The effort they put behind..awesome..every new tech develops like this...the image processing they use will be a back bone in VR field.. They can modify the system to use outdoors...by using a system of drone cameras distributed around the 360• space.. Controlled by a single unit...can contract and expand ...thus changing the volumetric space....wow awesome.. I think, that is their next target...👍

this is amazing! now if only there's a way to dive our consciousness into the video itself instead of us moving around moving the device everywhere that would be game changer.

This is what I'm talking about!

Live action movies turned in to viewer controllable camera view just like video games (example Strategy Games camera).

Waoo its was a amazing video

Incrível

This is a digital version of the Peppers Ghost Illusion with the Matrix effect as a complication. Nothing new here but interesting to see it being used this way.

We're slowly working our way back to silent movie style

TED JJANG~^^👍👍👍👍👍👍👊👊👊👊👊👊🎶🎶

eh. I know it’s early but it looks bad. Could be used for some stylized scenes maybe. What I love about cinema is how it guides us to new information, frame by frame.

The approach he’s explained is used for a while already to make such flying around camera effects in modern movies. And if we’re talking of moving the whole video to 3D, cinematic video games do it already for about 20 years. Also, he touched some technical aspects and mentioned voxels. There is no way you can save detailed (!) space of like 100^3 meters in voxels. It will be an enormous amount of data. They must still use polygons (triangles) to describe the surfaces at some point anyways. So, I’m not really sure about what discovery the whole talk is, that’s all been used in the industry for a while.

This is nuts

I had another idea that I wish caught on by now. This talks about a multiple different angles of the same scene, but what about the same scene acted multiple different ways? We are in the digital age, no more VHS tapes, so why not have a movie use this and be slightly different every time you watch it? It would give the actors a lot of creativity in doing the same action multiple different ways. At the bare minimum all the important story points would have 4 or 5 versions, but a director could go crazy and shoot _every_ scene 2 or 3 ways to make the entire movie different. Make it pick the next scene at random so it's never the same movie twice. Perhaps there's more than one satisfying ending to the story too, so your friend sees a different ending than you did. I just thought that would be really cool and make everything very rewatchable, even more so than volumetric video. I'm not sure how volumetric could be utilized. People aren't going to get up and walk in circles just to watch the movie. I guess you could make some rotary park ride out of it that moves for you. If the target is people who want to sit down and watch something, it's cheaper and easier just to make a 3D story driven video game. This is a huge challenge trying to practically implement this

IMAGINE TFKIN GOOSEBUMPS If they recreate the end game through this tech " Avengers assemble" AROUND YOU.

I really wonder what Scorsese and other current filmmakers feel about it

대박...

Marry this with VR and you got yourself a deal.

Volumetric video in to Apple's ARKIT. By the way kudo's to voulmetric video capture technology.

COOL! I was always a big fan of 3D, & bummed when they stopped the really good 3D content. I still have a widescreen 3D LG TV. I would love to see this.

Best

It's cool and everything, but can't help but imagine this could be more efficiently achieved through improvements in CG.

Can't you just use lidar and one camera instead... perhaps iphone?

The technology must be better than simple VR now

Watching movies with VR and running around sucks. You shouldn't have partnered with Paramount, but with PornHub.

same could be achieved with mocap suits since over a decade when they render how he showed on the grease example

I cant even afford the ssds for my only camera and these dudes have like duzens. I can only imagine getting like 1terabyte/SECOND of fast storage and then a cluster server for editting

Dang you talk about a lot of interesting talking points in the video production industry! We like what you do, keep going. Anytime you're in Phoenix let us know. If you want, direct message us @dmakproductions on Instagram and we can connect. You kill it!

This Guy = Ryan Gosling + Christoph Waltz

Is this a TED talk, or a sales pitch to the movie market?

shawsank

this is like BMW's 360 camera, but with more horsepower.

isnt this the same exact same thing as what intel is doing with freeD technology, just alot worse then intel and at a way smaller scale? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gJ2ofKWgtdicY3U.html this a video of intel freeD technology from 2 years ago.

Have microphone me it use assistant voice บอกมาได้ มัน เป็นขโมย หริอ เจ้าของอะไร ผมไมเคย ทำ ชั่วกับคนอื่น

adult content is gonna get great

someone has to get zack snyder on this right now!

Holaa

Doesn't the film industry have to show some solidarity with other industries making efforts to reduce their carbon footprint? The explosive computational requirements for this volumetric video fad have a tremendous cost in terms of CO2 emissions.

เอาไปให้หมด300 แอปup

yas kween

It sounds great even filmmaking s not one of my interests.Go ahead😉

Problem is, with this technology, reflective surfaces cannot be represented. And every surface is reflective, even if you think it isn't. It's called the fresnel effect and it is very important for realism.

I guess this isn't really that good for VR and moving yourself around to watch a film. As a filmmaker, this is sick af, because you can get any shot within a scene you shoot, and leave it all for the edit to choose the shots you want, which means the director can actually return to the old days of how plays were created for audiences, and focus on the acting and elements of that scene. Actors have to repeat their lines and scenes because directors need different angles and shots in scenes, but with this, you can just get one take of the actors, and have all the shots for the editing ready to go. I guess close-ups arent that good yet and probs will take up heaps of storage for all those high def cameras to get into the details of someones face without making it look unrealistic, but maybe in the very far future this might come in handy. For now I think its still good that actors have multiple takes to get something right, kind of like rewriting your script over and over to get more detail and ideas for your story, as these cameras might mean that actors will probs be rushed to get their performances out for a studio, meaning worse acting as a whole. But yeah this would be sick for editing and just getting every shot conceivable within a scene, at your fingertips.

와

Take my money

Any armys here after BTS's performance at MAMA?

I don’t know what that is 🤷🏾‍♂️

Seems like an awful waste of time just to bridge the gap between current filming methods and real time photo-real CG character renders.

It's sad that Intel decommissioned the Intel studios

This would be useless for someone like me who gets motion sickness just by watching someone else play a video game

FIRST as of 2:04 PM

He's describing mocap like it hasnt existed for decades...I think the only place this probably wont serve a lot IS movies. Think of 3D video, 360 video, laser scans, the freakin Kinect? Always sold as the next great thing and it ends up being a small niche for certain applications, mostly non-fiction stuff.

Nearly as good as RR - Real Reality. RR has 3D, HI (Human intelligence), live streaming, surround sound, smell, taste, tactile touch capacity, a portable screen, the best cameras (our eyes), real time renders, and real time editing capability. LOL

All going above my head... Can not grasp what he wants to say...my bad

Apple’s next acquisition

Another piece of great tech in search of an application. Meanwhile, John Favreau and team just actually revolutionised film making. Google Mandalorian filmmaking technology if you don’t believe me

MicroVision made this possible

I wonder what Siskel and Ebert would have said. Still prefer real life skills and talent.

go 1.5 speed. Youre welcome.

It's amazing, but not adding anything to film making we don't already have.

So just CGI everything?

First

Nah this is can be a tool for 2d movies but this can replace 2d movies and nothing will ever replace 2d movies because the art will be gone for example cinematography, composition, the real art in movie making is to view what director wants to you to see and how like in Dunkirk camera never was placed where a person can never reach, and like blade runner how composition in the frame of straight lines and shades were symmetrical, here one can view from any angle

Sadly it does not exist anymore.

What makes this guy think that viewers want to be camera operators or it's any way better than camera angle and movement chosen by professional operator? "Horse cam" was his pitch, I guess. People have been strapping action cameras on pets ever since they entered consumer market. No Oscars won on any of such experiments. Tape camera on horse's nose and get your shot. No need for supercomputing camera dome.

Come on now, there's nothing movie makers can't make on the screen. This does not solve any particular problem, so it is useless for the industry, as well as for the viewers.

End providers are also bad use account outlook information drives me drake software to it now