How Was Life For Pagans In The Late Roman Empire?

  Рет қаралды 26,607

Maiorianus

Maiorianus

22 күн бұрын

🔴 YOU WANT TO SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL? 🔴
🤗 Join our Patreon community: / maiorianus
😉 Or become an official Maiorianus member on KZfaq: / maiorianus461
🎁 The official Maiorianus merch store is now OPEN:
maiorianus.myspreadshop.com
⚔️ SPQR Shop, excellent hand-crafted Roman rings and other items:
spqrshop.com/?sca_ref=4770010...
Enter the code "Maiorianus" to get a 20% discount on every purchase. The ideal present for any fan of Rome 😉!
The wonderful background music is by Adrian von Ziegler: • Relaxing Roman Music -...
Disclosures: Some links in the description are affiliate links which means that if you purchase something by clicking on one of them, your host Sebastian will receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. In this way you will be supporting the channel to improve the video production quality at no extra cost to you.
🤗 One-Time Donation?
- PayPal: paypal.me/Maiorianus
- Bitcoin: bc1qv4lsfsplvfecrrgvmfclhga28we7mvh9563xdj
🔗 Share the video with anyone who might be interested (it helps a ton!)
📬 Contact us: maiorianus.sebastian@gmail.com
#Maiorianus

Пікірлер: 382
@Maiorianus_Sebastian
@Maiorianus_Sebastian 21 күн бұрын
🤗 Join our Patreon community: www.patreon.com/Maiorianus
@commentfreely5443
@commentfreely5443 21 күн бұрын
better than it was for christians under pagans
@skull99crusher16
@skull99crusher16 21 күн бұрын
​@@commentfreely5443LoL
@svon1
@svon1 21 күн бұрын
@@commentfreely5443 are you sure about that ? with the Pagans went also their way of thinking, their analytics and Logic became less and less relevant because it went against the believe of the Christian-Taliban. The crisis of the 3rd century was far worse, than what the Romans were facing in the 400s, the only difference was the Christians. A Pagan Rome would maybe have lost Britain and part of the Rhine Area temporarily but it would have stood firm against the odds.
@kimberlyperrotis8962
@kimberlyperrotis8962 21 күн бұрын
Constantine had to proceed slowly with Christianization, the vast majority of the Empire’s subjects were pagans. I just read an estimate that even by the year AD 400, more than half of the Romans were thought to still be pagans.
@mango2005
@mango2005 21 күн бұрын
In 363 yes. but 400?
@iDeathMaximuMII
@iDeathMaximuMII 21 күн бұрын
​@@mango2005Half the Senate was still Pagan in 400AD aswell, so not far fetched
@andrewward5891
@andrewward5891 21 күн бұрын
Constantine’s conversion was mostly politically motivated. Christians were the biggest religious group in the empire by then but not the majority. So Constantine carefully walked in Christian and pagan worlds. He still sacrificed to the Roman gods and didn’t get baptized until he was on his deathbed
@Easternromanfan
@Easternromanfan 20 күн бұрын
​@andrewward5891 Constantine didn't sacrifice to the Roman gods after he converted. It also wasn't a political move. He had long since had Christian sympathies because of his mother. His baptism occurred on his death bed because he wanted to be reborn and not commit crimes afterwards against God. Being a emperor is bloody business
@KawaiiCanadafreememes
@KawaiiCanadafreememes 18 күн бұрын
​@@andrewward5891 Most estimates say Christians made up less than 10% of the population by the time of his conversion.
@Am-ih5nf
@Am-ih5nf 21 күн бұрын
The Mitra festival (Mitra Punim) is still celebrated in India. The Multan Sun temple dedicated to Mitra has been destroyed though.
@battlerushiromiya651
@battlerushiromiya651 14 күн бұрын
Different deities.
@Am-ih5nf
@Am-ih5nf 14 күн бұрын
@@battlerushiromiya651 How?
@Am-ih5nf
@Am-ih5nf 14 күн бұрын
@@battlerushiromiya651 The Multan Sun Temple, which was until 1947 India’s primary Mitra pilgrimage site, was headed by both Zoroastrian and Hindu priests and they didnt seem to differ in their interpretation of Mitra, which linked both the Sun (Surya) with the fire (Agni) and the waters (Apam napat)
@battlerushiromiya651
@battlerushiromiya651 14 күн бұрын
@@Am-ih5nf Mitra and Surya arw different deities. Surya dev is not a mystery religion and no animal sacrifise is done on its premises. Other than being linked to the sun, there is nothing qw know about mitrausn that is not guesswork. Also what is yoir source on it being linked to zoroastrians? In india zoroastrins reject members of thwir own community if they marry someone outside tje community. Zoroastrian priests were also responsible for stopping the spread of Buddhism in Persian empires. It is difficult to think they will share a temple with another community
@thisisaname5589
@thisisaname5589 13 күн бұрын
Good, but not good enough. Dismantle all paganism.
@user-nt4zn3mz1g
@user-nt4zn3mz1g 20 күн бұрын
Maiorianus, the scholar of comparative religion Mircea Eliade would say that 'worship' is not the right word to use in describing pagan religious practices. Worship for us is about adoration and abasing ourselves to a transcendent deity. That's Middle Eastern. Romans didn't adore their gods. They thought they were dangerous, and that's why it was so necessary to find out by divination what they would support or oppose. The Roman formula was I give you this that you will give me that. It was a business arrangement created by extremely practical and hard headed people. Another important side of the religion was the cult of the ancestors, which was in the hands of the paterfamilias. According to the historian Franz Cumont, the paterfamilias had his own secret rites which could only be passed on to his sons.
@SleepyPotterFan
@SleepyPotterFan 20 күн бұрын
Mircea was part of an older generation of religious scholars though. The various culti of the antiquity cannot be paired with so broad a brush, and not even the Romans can. While it is true that the state “religio” had a very strict observation of orthopraxy, we’ve come to understand that Roman religion was far more complex for the average person, the same way that a Catholic priest follows a very careful formula during mass, but Catholics show devotion in a billion different ways. And that’s just for Rome for the later republic into the empire, because every God’s cultus could be different, and that’s exponentially true when dealing with thousands of historic and extant polytheistic traditions. Very true though, that there’s very little arbitrary abasement and governing of private lives.
@cat_city2009
@cat_city2009 21 күн бұрын
1:40 I love this art style. Like a 2000s video game.
@InfiniteApollo12
@InfiniteApollo12 20 күн бұрын
It’s from AC Odyssey.
@VOLightPortal
@VOLightPortal 18 күн бұрын
Yes, gives the general vibe of how it must feel to have lived back then. Lots of vibrant colour and fabrics, quite surreal, otherworldly, sacred, and chill. Generally festive and spritual atmosphere. Sadly not what we see much of at all today. Just shells with not much substance. We lost a lot in 2000 years and never recovered properly.
@InfiniteApollo12
@InfiniteApollo12 18 күн бұрын
@@VOLightPortal I love the accuracy of your statement. It’s so well phrased
@OptimusMaximusNero
@OptimusMaximusNero 21 күн бұрын
Vestal: "I saw a cute boy yesterday!" 😊 Domitian: "So you have chosen death..."
@gregstephens2339
@gregstephens2339 19 күн бұрын
?
@Vella_Attika
@Vella_Attika 19 күн бұрын
@@gregstephens2339the vestal virgins swore an oath of chastity
@MrChristianDT
@MrChristianDT 17 күн бұрын
Priest: I saw a cute boy, yesterday...
@mr.markov3552
@mr.markov3552 17 күн бұрын
@@Vella_Attikaok💀
@NorthForkFisherman
@NorthForkFisherman 17 күн бұрын
Vestal: "I think you'd like him. he looks A LOT like Earinus" Domitian: "PROMOTED TO HEAD VESTAL!"
@lukang72
@lukang72 20 күн бұрын
You should do videos of popular cults in late Rome such as Mithras and Sol Invictus and how they differed from early Roman practice and why these new cults became popular and their origins and effects on society
@theeccentrictripper3863
@theeccentrictripper3863 18 күн бұрын
In a word, soteriology. The Crisis of the Third Century was rough, really rough, and a lot of people lost a lot of things, including their devotion to gods that weren't particularly molded to "save" people. As people look for salvation for the empire they start to run with that idea religiously, looking to gods who were in the business of saving people. The Mysteries of Isis is a very early example of a more salvific religious school but they compound and grow as the empire experiences its decline, terminating in, you guessed it, Christianity.
@OptimusMaximusNero
@OptimusMaximusNero 21 күн бұрын
Ngl, it's pretty hilarious how Theodosius's reaction to pagans complaining about their cults being banned was: "Do you genuinely think I give a damn?"
@julioflavioosti371
@julioflavioosti371 21 күн бұрын
Yes, on the other hand, the end of Christianity is being very different. It is dying from indifference, not from banishment.
@baha3alshamari152
@baha3alshamari152 20 күн бұрын
​@@julioflavioosti371 Roman Christianity died long time ago but we don't know how The old Christianity died when Constantine converted and changed the religion in order to suit the Roman empire beliefs
@EmilMasnyj
@EmilMasnyj 20 күн бұрын
⁠@@baha3alshamari152lmao wtf is this even supposed to mean?
@baha3alshamari152
@baha3alshamari152 20 күн бұрын
@@EmilMasnyj It means that the middle ages version of Christianity was different than the original version Christianity was dead 1700 years ago
@EmilMasnyj
@EmilMasnyj 20 күн бұрын
@@baha3alshamari152 how? Explain what you mean, don’t just state it like it’s fact. And how exactly did Constantine “change the religion to suit the Roman Empire beliefs”?
@kerneywilliams632
@kerneywilliams632 21 күн бұрын
I think the biggest factor in Christianization was making it hard to transmit your beliefs to the next generation. I suspect many Hellene was buried by their Christian grandchildren.
@christopherevans2445
@christopherevans2445 21 күн бұрын
So glad we have this Channel. One of the top Roman history channels, and there are some good ones
@BernasLL
@BernasLL 21 күн бұрын
I'd add a mention to Saint Martin of Dume, who even outside of the Roman state in the suebian conquered part of Iberia, worked against pagan practices, whilst documenting them. So, not just the state was working against paganism, the church had its own ways.
@user-uo7fw5bo1o
@user-uo7fw5bo1o 16 күн бұрын
So they _were_ like ISIS and the Taliban.
@colbystearns5066
@colbystearns5066 20 күн бұрын
It seems like Christianization was a gradual process that slowly consumed Roman culture until it became something that would've been unrecognizable to someone like Augustus or Trajan. What started out as a snowball under Constantine eventually became an avalanche by the time of Justinian.
@theeccentrictripper3863
@theeccentrictripper3863 18 күн бұрын
Roman religion was kind of like that as a paradigm, the religion of Numa was not the religion of Julian, there was a long process of innovation, appropriation, and syncretization that proceeded from the time of the monarchy down to the Dominate. There is a book specifically about this paradigm, although I believe it terminates with the religious reforms of Augustus, it's called The Religion of Numa by Jesse Benedict Carter, it's a bit dated chronologically but still a fantastic work that aptly describes this shifting through time. The Modern Hermeticist, a channel ran by Dr. Dan Attrell, has audiobook versions of it if you care to give it a listen.
@rusmeister7144
@rusmeister7144 21 күн бұрын
GK Chesterton nailed it in his book “the Everlasting Man“. People generally stopped believing en masse. They no longer believed the pagan religions, as they did in the Roman republic. The hedonists and stoics were giving way to atheism and despair. The bloodthirstiness in the Colosseum was symptomatic of that. Hardly anyone would die for Zeus or Mithras. Cesar declared himself a god, and that sealed the general unbelief of the populace in their own historical religions. It was on that background that the Christians appeared, the martyrs were willing to die for what they believed in, witnessed by people who no longer had anything worth living or dying for. The Christians had something worth dying for, and that was why the popular shift, not just of the elites, but of the average citizen began towards Christianity. Paganism as serious religion like the pagan philosophies, were already essentially dead. The last thing the old pagans did was to get baptized. But people who hate Christianity are not going to want to hear that.
@MrWolfstar8
@MrWolfstar8 20 күн бұрын
The religion died because people no longer knew their fathers. Most of the gods started off as important people from their linage who over time became revered as gods. It was ancestor worship but failed once the line of father to son was broken. Read the “the ancient city” for an overview of the subject.
@rusmeister7144
@rusmeister7144 20 күн бұрын
@@MrWolfstar8 No, that’s not why, though I am not going to quarrel with you. Read “The Everlasting Man” with an open mind. “There are a dozen points of view until you know the answer; then there is only one.”
@belstar1128
@belstar1128 19 күн бұрын
the romans were not atheist ever but Christians were more motivated and organised and wanted to convert everyone while pagans didn't .but everyone who lived 2000 years ago either believed in gods or sprits or other supernatural beings
@belstar1128
@belstar1128 19 күн бұрын
@@MrWolfstar8 the pagan religions are so old that they predate written language so these ancestors could have lived in the ice age
@rusmeister7144
@rusmeister7144 19 күн бұрын
@@belstar1128 When we make generalizations, you have to make allowance for nuances and exceptions. The Caesars DID become essentially atheist in practical fact; “Caesar Divus” is evidence enough of that. Regarding the general populace, it would be more accurate to say that belief in paganism waned, especially among the upper classes, as did even belief in the philosophies that had carried weight only a couple of centuries prior. It was that lack of general fervent belief that made “bread and circuses” so important. Sure, people continued to sacrifice, kept the household gods, but increasingly lost faith in them. THAT was the vacuum of belief that had developed when Christians appeared declaring, not one god among many, but One God period, the equality of all men, of men and women, and of eternal life and love. But since that was an obvious threat to the status quo, the skeptical rulers began persecuting them. But they had something to die for, something that decadent Rome no longer had and that people still thirsted for.
@kimberlyperrotis8962
@kimberlyperrotis8962 21 күн бұрын
Commenting and adding emojis help boost the channel❤❤❤Great work, Sebastian, as always.
@Maiorianus_Sebastian
@Maiorianus_Sebastian 19 күн бұрын
Thanks a lot Kimberly, I really appreciate it very much
@Seer_Of_The_Woodlands
@Seer_Of_The_Woodlands 21 күн бұрын
it's hard to imagine seeing traditions that are over a thousand years old disappear around you. to see the fire of Rome go out from the capital.
@user-uo7fw5bo1o
@user-uo7fw5bo1o 16 күн бұрын
Worse is to see this new Emperor who drowned and beheaded his predecessor at the Milvian bridge steal all the statuary and everything of value from The City to the new town he personally had built on the Bosporus for a strange "new" religion and his own vanity.
@Seer_Of_The_Woodlands
@Seer_Of_The_Woodlands 16 күн бұрын
@@user-uo7fw5bo1o interesting. have you ever heard of pharaoh akhenaten he founded a new monotheistic religion banned other gods and closed their temples and built a new capital. but his son put an end to that religion and destroyed that city and reopened the temples. this boy's name was Tutankhamun.
@user-uo7fw5bo1o
@user-uo7fw5bo1o 15 күн бұрын
@@Seer_Of_The_Woodlands Yes I have heard of Akhenaten. But Tutenkamen (sp.?) was the pharaoh who went on a world tour in the 1980s. I understand that Akhenaten was extremely unpopular.
@Seer_Of_The_Woodlands
@Seer_Of_The_Woodlands 15 күн бұрын
@@user-uo7fw5bo1o History is interesting and yes specifically that tutatkhamon. the one who died young presumably under the wheel of a war chariot. but it is interesting how even Pharaoh's attempt to change the will of his people failed. it is ironic that you could say that "he flew too close to the sun" (; not liked is an understatement. an attempt was made to completely destroy his name's entire existence. his name was destroyed from temple walls and documents and considering that for the ancient Egyptians a person's name was part of the soul an attempt to destroy the name was an attempt to destroy the soul itself. it's a wonder we know he even existed.
@user-uo7fw5bo1o
@user-uo7fw5bo1o 15 күн бұрын
@@Seer_Of_The_Woodlands Exactly, thanks!
@tiusernamenabalw
@tiusernamenabalw 19 күн бұрын
From a Greek who is also a Roman, thank you!
@Maiorianus_Sebastian
@Maiorianus_Sebastian 18 күн бұрын
Thank you again, Sir, you indeed carry on the legacy of the Roman Empire !
@theeccentrictripper3863
@theeccentrictripper3863 18 күн бұрын
Is the Rhomaioi identity very strong in Greece these days? From what I've read the rebirth of the Greek state as a Western Hellenic project really drove a wedge between the Hellenic identity of Antiquity so beloved by the folks doing the restoration and the on-the-ground identity of Roman Christians as they had evolved into by that period of time. Do people beef about this, or is it just kind of a meme?
@bariuslippius
@bariuslippius 18 күн бұрын
​@@theeccentrictripper3863we call ourselves Mainly greeks,but we also are reffered to as Romioi, A very popular poem of ours is called Romiosini which means Romanness.
@theeccentrictripper3863
@theeccentrictripper3863 18 күн бұрын
@@bariuslippius So Ελληνικά specifically, or do folks use Γραικοί instead? Is there a kind of pan-Greek identity that acknowledges the entire body of Greek history or do people end up leaning towards one mode of what it is to be Greek or another? I'll be traveling over there in a few months and I'm both fascinated by this contrast but also concerned about accidentally pissing someone off lol
@bariuslippius
@bariuslippius 17 күн бұрын
@@theeccentrictripper3863 we dont rrly use graikos,its like a poetic name for the greeks nowadays
@mikemoreno4469
@mikemoreno4469 21 күн бұрын
This is one of my favourite YT channel.
@karlheinzvonkroemann2217
@karlheinzvonkroemann2217 21 күн бұрын
Great channel that I've learned a tremendous amount of history from. Thanks Sebastian!
@daveweiss5647
@daveweiss5647 20 күн бұрын
I am no expert... but didn't the romans also have a very strong tradition of ancestor worship? Which is what the in home shrines were often used for? Thanks.
@flavius2884
@flavius2884 17 күн бұрын
Another great video. thank you for covering these niche topics.
@WAFFENAMT1
@WAFFENAMT1 21 күн бұрын
From what I understand in the late Roman empire under Constantine if you were Pagan you better not tell anyone....
@mango2005
@mango2005 21 күн бұрын
Constantine wasnt a major persecutor. He did close some temples but he continued to appoint Pagans alongside Christians. The population was still majority Pagan. Animal sacrifices were banned either under him or (my opinion) his son Constantius II. Burning incense was not persecuted under Constantine.
@DISTurbedwaffle918
@DISTurbedwaffle918 21 күн бұрын
For the most part, you'd probably just get called a hillbilly.
@andrewward5891
@andrewward5891 21 күн бұрын
Constantine himself wasn’t baptized until he was on his deathbed
@DISTurbedwaffle918
@DISTurbedwaffle918 21 күн бұрын
@@andrewward5891 That was sort of the style of the time for some converts. The proper order of things hadn't yet been established.
@mikhailturkhan7686
@mikhailturkhan7686 20 күн бұрын
Under Constantine and his successors, there were still highly-placed pagans in the Imperial administration.
@jedisith85
@jedisith85 22 күн бұрын
An another amazing video! Brilliant! Thank you! 💯👍
@Maiorianus_Sebastian
@Maiorianus_Sebastian 21 күн бұрын
Thank you so much for your kind words, it is highly appreciated!
@MrMirville
@MrMirville 11 күн бұрын
Pagan temples were essentially banks and treasuries where in exchange for gifts you were entitled to particular pensions or periodic rewards : each deity was a particular banking company specialized in certain goods and domains of economic activities : for instance, Venus was about cosmetics, fashions and all items related to seduction. They were to slowly disappear only when there remained no riches to bank.
@SleepyPotterFan
@SleepyPotterFan 20 күн бұрын
Literally my only problem is that Roman polytheists and even early Christians prayed “orans” with their palms extended to the heavens (praying to chthonic deities would usually included turning them down). Otherwise, as always, you are a treasure in this weary world.
@constantius4654
@constantius4654 13 күн бұрын
Another really first class portrayal of the late Roman empire. Thank you.
@crusader2112
@crusader2112 19 күн бұрын
Hey, I’ve been a fan of your videos and just wanted to say, keep up the great work. I’m a Catholic Christian, but I still enjoy your channel. Peace ✌🏻 and have a Blessed week.
@catholicconvert2119
@catholicconvert2119 18 күн бұрын
Me too
@pedrokarstguimaraes1096
@pedrokarstguimaraes1096 18 күн бұрын
Bravo for this relevant detail unexplored in History 👍 It would be interesting to know how much panteon of Kelts keep to be venerated in Roman Empire.
@theeccentrictripper3863
@theeccentrictripper3863 18 күн бұрын
A little rough but a good foray for anyone who has little knowledge of this period in time. Things are quite a bit messier though, and require a fair bit of theology, both pagan and Christian, to really suss out. For example, the philosophical schools were not inert through the Roman period but went through periods of innovation and evolution, resulting in a variety of new schools, the most compelling being the Neoplatonism of Plotinus, Porphyry, and Iamblichus. Neoplatonism is an attempted synthesis of Greco-Roman philosophy into a unified body of thought and for educated pagans, and Christians, Neoplatonism served as a scaffolding for a more mystical interaction with philosophy and the divine. Most know Julian as a pagan generally but specifically he was a student of Iamblichan Neoplatonism, which distinguishes itself from Plotinus' system in a variety of ways that are tangential to this conversation, but it carries not just Greco-Roman ideas but Egyptian and "Chaldean" ones as well. This system continues to evolve in the 5th and 6th centuries, terminating in Proclus and Damascius, but finds new life in Christian Neoplatonism via characters like Pseudo-Dionysius. Christianity and pagan philosophy are kissing cousins, or "frenemies" perhaps, and remained so until the political situation changed; the calcification of Christian dogma in the face of numerous other schools of Christianity hardened the universalism of orthodox Christianity, bringing a greater zeal to the table, which was already a raging fire. This isn't the whole story either though, as the mystery cults of Antiquity were numerous and by their initiatory nature were not modes of religion that could be easily suppressed; there is also the phenomenon of Hermeticism in places like Alexandria where the Egyptian mysteries were believed to be best preserved. In regards to labels Hellene is a Christian moniker that grows in the late Dominate period; it was, at least at that time, an archaic term for Greeks and their ways and was used to distinguish between ye olden Greeks and the Christian Romans, an identity the Greeks themselves cultivated during the Roman period. A run of the mill Roman probably would've been a bit flabbergasted by it, but it wasn't entirely one-sided either; in the case of Julian, who was entirely enthralled with Hellenism, embraced the label in a kind of rebellious way, to distinguish himself from the Christian elite who raised him and made up his social circle. Honestly you could spend a lifetime reading about this intellectual milieu, so much was going on and there were so many factions, all interacting with each other and riffing on each others' ideas, the closer one looks the harder it is to cut clean lines between "pagans" and "Christians", it's a crude dichotomy that frankly debases the intellectual beauty, and tragedy, of the period, and neglects other phenomena like Manicheanism and Gnosticism. Apologies for the lack of brevity, this is kind of my wheelhouse so I tend to bloviate excessively lol
@WinstonSmithGPT
@WinstonSmithGPT 16 күн бұрын
While it’s true that pagan philosophy continued to intertwine with Christianity for the next thousand years (Aquinas!), his emphasis here seems to be on cultus. Being a well educated philosopher takes a lot of money, then and now, but every humble house had its laertes and its rites. When those were abandoned, antiquity had truly changed. The classic bon mot was to say the pagan gods died of their own beauty. I used to dismiss this quip as silly but there’s something to it. In Aeschylus you can feel the raw tremor of chthonic revenge goddesses beneath your feet, but eventually the gods become wall decorations and magic shows. Aesthetics drove out transcendence.
@theeccentrictripper3863
@theeccentrictripper3863 16 күн бұрын
@@WinstonSmithGPT The problem with that thesis is the final word: transcendence. The gods weren't transcendent, they were here and there and everywhere, visible through the weather or in disease, they were hovering right over you and you were mindful to humor them and make allies of them. The evolution of philosophy through the Roman period drove to a transcendent One, which some deified, but it wasn't there from the start and in trying to pursue transcendental divinity the Roman world left the gods of hearth and home, seeing them as unworthy and incorrect by virtue of not being transcendent, among other theological reasons. Ironically it was transcendence itself, and the zealous pursuit of it, that laid the old gods low. This wasn't destined though, Neoplatonism is a possible mode of mediation between transcendental divinity and localized divinity, and we can look to India to see modes of religion that are simultaneously polytheistic and transcendentally monist operating in total internal harmony.
@Babatmes
@Babatmes 21 күн бұрын
I just love your content Sebastian I learned so much from you about late Roman history
@statisticalseminarsdcmeetu8491
@statisticalseminarsdcmeetu8491 11 күн бұрын
Thank you for this
@liberty_and_justice67
@liberty_and_justice67 21 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@Maiorianus_Sebastian
@Maiorianus_Sebastian 19 күн бұрын
And thank you Sir, for your kind donation :)
@MatthewRandazzoV
@MatthewRandazzoV 18 күн бұрын
Love your channel
@Shimra8888
@Shimra8888 21 күн бұрын
Sad to see an ancient European culture and civilization being supplanted by a religion from the Middle East. I wonder why Europe couldn’t maintain Hellenism in the face of this Semitic religion while its cousin Hinduism survived in India despite its Semitic religion?
@cleitondecarvalho431
@cleitondecarvalho431 21 күн бұрын
there are multiple reasons why that happend, by I prefer to believe the romans were very religious people and tooke religion too serious whereas the hindus, well, it's complicated, they have temples dedicated to motocycles...
@Shimra8888
@Shimra8888 21 күн бұрын
@@cleitondecarvalho431 or the Indians value their heritage and civilization more than the heritage of a foreign faith and people maybe?
@scorpionfiresome3834
@scorpionfiresome3834 21 күн бұрын
@@Shimra8888 Had Julian not died early, Christianity would be one of the many faiths in the empire, or it will disintegrate as the sects could not agree on anything.
@Shimra8888
@Shimra8888 21 күн бұрын
@@scorpionfiresome3834 indeed. What a pity, and ironic, he fell to the Persians. With out hindsight it would have been preferable if the Romans and Persians worked together to push back the Abrahamic faiths, instead the Semitic Scourge overthrew both Romans and Persians eventually causing all the problems of today. We’ll see how the Hindutva movement and BJP handle their Abrahamics in India. A pity Europe doesn’t have a Hellenicva movement to match their Hindu cousins.
@scorpionfiresome3834
@scorpionfiresome3834 21 күн бұрын
@@Shimra8888 Interestingly, the Sassanids killing Julian kickstarted a chain of events that led to the fall of the Sassanids. So in hindsight they unknowingly sealed their fate. Since his death made Christianity come back as the state religion, it could now freely spread under draconic emperors, 3 centuries later, Christianity influences the forming of Islam, then Arabs then go on and destroy the Sassanids.
@michaelcase8574
@michaelcase8574 18 күн бұрын
In Latin pagan originaly meant country people.
@belstar1128
@belstar1128 19 күн бұрын
the more i learn about the pagans the more i like them .but i can also see why Christianity Islam and Buddhism got so big they wanted to spread their religion while pagans didn't care about that you can believe them or not .sometimes they got violent when you offended them or when they did human sacrifice but that was rare .
@crusader2112
@crusader2112 19 күн бұрын
In the end, that’s why Christianity won. It wanted to spread, the lesson: if your beliefs to survive you have to spread and preach them. Not in inappropriate place of course.
@KawaiiCanadafreememes
@KawaiiCanadafreememes 18 күн бұрын
European Paganism tends to get a better reputation than it deserves due to rose-tinted glasses, it was in its own way a universalist religion and had its own strict sets of rites, restrictions and sects/cults. People were expected under legal prosecution to partake in certain rituals and rites. You'll note that the process of discrimination against Pagans didn't begin with actual persecution, but simply the removal of privileges held by pagan priests and the favouring of Christianity in affairs of the state
@JM-hn6vg
@JM-hn6vg 14 күн бұрын
Wasn't it the pagans who persecuted the Hebrews and early Christians...?
@georgiopasca2720
@georgiopasca2720 5 күн бұрын
Pagans got destroyed because they were not united, if they were united then they would have dethroned constantine at that time or even his son when he was ruling against pagan
@OptimusMaximusNero
@OptimusMaximusNero 21 күн бұрын
Speaking of late pagans, it's quite possible that the guy who wrote the infamous "Historia Augusta" was a closeted pagan, as he clearly shows contempt for Christianity in his work and complains that Rome is now ruled by children, being a possible reference to Honorius and Valentinian III
@iDeathMaximuMII
@iDeathMaximuMII 21 күн бұрын
Times in which the Empire was ruled by children (long term) Gratian - aged 16 when he succeeded his father as Sole Western Augustus Valentinian II - 4 year old boy Declared Augustus by soldiers If the Historia Augusta was written at that time, then they must have come from the western half of the Empire But aside from those 2, yeah Honorius or Valentinian III are good guesses
@TheM41a
@TheM41a 21 күн бұрын
I mean was he wrong?
@Mahj111
@Mahj111 21 күн бұрын
@@TheM41a His records are considered a laughingstock almost 2000 years after that. So yes, he was an idiot and what a wasted opportunity to put real records on paper.
@jody6851
@jody6851 20 күн бұрын
I recall reading years ago Gore Vidal's novel "Julian" about Emperor Julian the Apostate who was the last emperor who tried to restore Paganism. He was eventually killed in a war against the Parthians, and some historians as insinuated in the novel believe he was actually assassinated using the battle he was killed in as a false flag by pro-Christian elements in the Roman Army. In the novel, the Pagans considered Christians the same way many people scoff at Scientologists today as a bunch of weirdos, calling them in the novel "the cult of the dead rabbi."
@theeternalanglo5629
@theeternalanglo5629 20 күн бұрын
I think both Christians and Pagans could agree that Honorius and Valentinian were impotent man-children
@macpduff2119
@macpduff2119 7 күн бұрын
I appreciate your channel. It explains the period that is usually ignored. Ive been interested in how did such a monumental shift happen between Ancient Rome and the modern western world.
@carlosfilho3402
@carlosfilho3402 21 күн бұрын
A Wonderful Video.
@tiusernamenabalw
@tiusernamenabalw 19 күн бұрын
Thanks from Greece. Our history books were not kind to Julian. The influence of the church lasts till this day…
@Maiorianus_Sebastian
@Maiorianus_Sebastian 18 күн бұрын
Hello dear Roman friend, Romaioi from the Eastern Roman Empire, thank you very much for your kind donation, I appreciate it very much
@JM-hn6vg
@JM-hn6vg 14 күн бұрын
Amen!
@Vigoda.D
@Vigoda.D 21 күн бұрын
Can you please talk about Jews in the late Roman empire and in the "Byzantine" empire
@lattucesoldier8794
@lattucesoldier8794 21 күн бұрын
I'd make a coop with Schwerpunkt on the topic
@baronghede2365
@baronghede2365 21 күн бұрын
I am a Pagan in Alabama!!! I would have to say, just keep pushing and don't let the hater's stop you, Blessed Be.
@misaelfraga8196
@misaelfraga8196 19 күн бұрын
Strange comment because as a Christian I myself saying the same thing since it's open season on being bigoted towards Christians.
@rengerespecter5913
@rengerespecter5913 18 күн бұрын
Almost like that’s a universal experience…
@tablestirne9879
@tablestirne9879 13 күн бұрын
@@misaelfraga8196 because Christians honestly though - suck balls in a way - Lets be honest - Europe saved Christianity as King Harrod and the Pharisees and the Jews were about to abolish and wipe it out. European Pagans gave Christianity a new home and instead of repaying that kindness, Christians ban paganism for some time destroying Europes true religion-Paganism whether it be Greek Celtic Germanic, all originally European versus a casted-out Jewish transplant christian. Today, the reason why Christianity is an impressive heritage is because through reformations and evolution, Christianity has become more open to other faiths and become more tolerant.
@LuisAldamiz
@LuisAldamiz 21 күн бұрын
It must be said that not all Roman subjects were "Hellenes" and I have doubts about how much can be the Roman/Latin religion be considered "Hellene" (even if it was clearly Hellenized it was Jupiter and not Zeus, Mars and not Ares and even Saturn and not Kronos, whom they primarily worshipped/venerated). In any case many followed other traditions such as the Celtic, Berber or Basque ones in the West or the Egyptian and Semitic ones in the East, never mind Persia-imported Manicheanism (a variant of Zoroastrianism), which was also a fad for a long time.
@TlatoaniMontezuma
@TlatoaniMontezuma 19 күн бұрын
Hellenes was just another name for pagans in late antiquity. Although you are correct that plenty of other traditions were followed at the time. Also, I don’t know if I’d describe Manichaeism as “a variant of Zoroastrianism”. It’s certainly of Persian origin, even influenced by Zoroastrianism, but the fact that it has plenty of other influences and the Zoroastrian Sassanids literally persecuted them makes me think it’s a fair bit different. Its founder Mani, was born into a family of Elcesaites, a Jewish-Christian sect with Gnostic influences, common in Babylon at the time.
@LuisAldamiz
@LuisAldamiz 19 күн бұрын
@@TlatoaniMontezuma - I never read anything about Roman Pagans calling themselves "Hellenes" in Latin. It makes no sense, because "Hellene" or similar is not even a Latin word, it would be "Graecus" (maybe "Hellenus" if said by someone very erudite who spoke Greek as L2) but not even that was used, because it has an ethno-linguistic meaning and not a religious one. Remember that one feature of Pagan religions was that they were ethnic and not universal (at least generally speaking). it was as thus an ethnic "cultural tradition" and by extension the religio of the state, which was part of an ethnic area, at least by part of the elite, such as Greece, Phoenicia or, in the case of Rome, Latium. Only with the Persian Empire first and Hellenism later they found themselves in more universalized ("globalized" they'd say today) or cosmopolitanized contexts in which they would need to make adjustmentes. But the state had one state religion and that was the religion of the elites. In the Hellenistic states it was generally the Greek religion (although with serious incorporation of other religions in terms of respect and synchretism, especially in Egypt) and in Rome it was the Roman religion, which was the local Roman variant of the Latin religion, which had been synchretizing with Greek religion for a very long time but was not the same thing really (where is Janus, god of gates, doors, duplicity and the new year, in Greek tradition?, where are the manes and the lares?, why did the Greeks pay not enough respect to Mars?, why did they not celebrate Saturnalia?, did Greeks even have a high priest who took care of fixing the calendar?) In Latin, and I speak a derived language, you never heard "Hellenus" in regard to religion, it was "Romanus" or "Romanorum", just as it was the state.
@LuisAldamiz
@LuisAldamiz 19 күн бұрын
@@TlatoaniMontezuma - PS: Most see Manicheanism as a form of Zoroastrianism but of course even monotheistic Judaism can be seen as such (transition from "elohim" = the gods to "El" = God in the E-source of the OT, which is generally attributed to the exile of Babylon and the ideological admixture with Zoroastrianism) and it seems that Judeo-Christian roots were influential in the upbringing and teachings of Mani anyhow. The emphasis on two cosmic forces fighting each other, almost equal, is anyhow very much Zoroastrian or Zoroastrian-like. But then again that's also present in Judaism, and especially Christianity (incl. Gnostic "heresies") and Islam, all of which over-emphasize Satan, as if in need of a powerful antagonist to make sense of themselves and to allow their own self-righteousness to condemn others in the name of that epic moral struggle that is ultimately Zoroastrian anyhow.
@TlatoaniMontezuma
@TlatoaniMontezuma 19 күн бұрын
@@LuisAldamiz did I say it was Latin? You seem, once again, to have a phenomenal ability to argue against what wasn’t even said. As for Zoroastrianism, again, I never denied its influence on Manichaeism. They are after all, like you said dualistic, but you know what isn’t? Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. It’s considered heretical by all orthodox elements of these faiths. Dualism is predecated on the fact that both good and evil, light and dark, are two co-equal and eternal forces. Now, do Christians, Jews, Muslims see the devil as equal with God? Of course not, they don’t even see him as co-eternal. There are of course some Zoroastrian influences on Judaism, they were famously freed by Cyrus during the Babylonian captivity and as such, whether the monolatrist elements of Judaism were abandoned here is a matter of debate and theory, but to claim it is dualistic is simply missing the mark. Gnosticism is out of all of these, the most dualistic, but even there, the demiurge isn’t seen as the “same as” as in Zoroastrianism. In any case, it was these Gnostic beliefs, in addition to Zoroastrian dualism, as well as other diverse religious beliefs from which Manichaeism derive. Very few would consider it “a form of Zoroastrianism” least of all the Zoroastrians of antiquity.
@LuisAldamiz
@LuisAldamiz 19 күн бұрын
@@TlatoaniMontezuma - The Romans spoke Latin, even the Byzantines did for a long time before finally accepting their Greek inheritance. You can't say "the Romans call themselves Hellenoi", they didn't: they didn't speak Greek (unless as L2), they called Greeks "Graeci" and they considered their religion to be the Roman religion, which was conveniently similar to the Greek one (and others too) but not identical. When Christian officers were required to take an oath of loyalty to the state, they were demanded to sacrifice to Jupiter (not Zeus) or later maybe Sol Invictus (not Helios), when Romans celebrated proto-Christmas and put candles on windows, they did not go around saying "merry Kronalia" but "Saturnalia" (the Greeks did not venerate Kronos, the Romans did venerate Saturn instead). It's not about being polemicist, it's about setting things right. You're the one cause polemic by taking an ideological "Hellenistic" stand that is all kinds of wrong.
@hassanabdel-hafeez1592
@hassanabdel-hafeez1592 21 күн бұрын
Hail to Maiorianus
@S4inh3ad
@S4inh3ad 21 күн бұрын
Very Nice.
@somewhatreallycoolguy7439
@somewhatreallycoolguy7439 12 күн бұрын
i swear i've heard this music before in a mount and blade mod
@sebozz2046
@sebozz2046 10 күн бұрын
Interesting
@AntonioBrandao
@AntonioBrandao 20 күн бұрын
12:40 isn’t it true that most of the temple destruction was to the East of Greece? Probably because at that time the West was still much more Pagan than the East?
@Maiorianus_Sebastian
@Maiorianus_Sebastian 19 күн бұрын
Hi Antonio, yes, there was certainly more destruction in the east, but even there, from what I could gather, %-wise, it was still a pretty low percentage. Not like 50% or so, but more like 10% tops. But it is also true, that there was destruction. However, the impact of that destruction is still an ongoing debate. There are those who say it was super insane and brutal, and those who say it was extremely limited. What exactly happened, is very difficult to reconstruct, but it seems as if it was very much regionally dependent. I am currently still investigating this topic, to hopefully get a fully picture at some point, of what really happened. There is a lot of propaganda from both sides: Pro pagan and pro christian XD. Makes it super difficult to discern how widespread the destruction was.
@AntonioBrandao
@AntonioBrandao 19 күн бұрын
@@Maiorianus_Sebastian I guess only counting complete destruction also doesn’t make a fair picture. Some temples were just desecrated / statues defaced / bad omens placed on them - or simply closed in which case it won’t count as “destruction” but still making them unusable.
@naturalcambion3747
@naturalcambion3747 21 күн бұрын
I would assume it was like the Christians of today. Slowly disappearing without so much as a whisper. Just crumbling monoliths of a bygone era.
@Easternromanfan
@Easternromanfan 20 күн бұрын
Christianity is on the rise world wide. Your countries lack of Christians doesn't speak to the bigger picture
@misaelfraga8196
@misaelfraga8196 19 күн бұрын
Christianity is still very strong the difference is denominations losing influence amomg the Fatihful.
@belstar1128
@belstar1128 19 күн бұрын
its different now because we have a lot of evidence that the religion is wrong but i think Christianity was also a consequence of a very simple technology (writing)
@jonathancunningham8739
@jonathancunningham8739 18 күн бұрын
@@belstar1128 We have no evidence that religion is right or wrong careful because you are starting to sound like a reddit atheist many progressive religious people accept science even evolution also Paganism is growing and progressive Christianity and spirituality is growing. Last Atheism is declining many prefer agostic and or spirituality or simply practising their faith their own way.
@belstar1128
@belstar1128 18 күн бұрын
@@jonathancunningham8739 Paganism is growing because it used to be illegal. Christianity is growing because of drcongo and Angola being some of the last countries were people have more than 2 kids on average .
@FrancisFjordCupola
@FrancisFjordCupola 21 күн бұрын
I wonder about the religions practiced in the African provinces. Although going back to the Punic wars and seeing what remained of Cartage's religions after isn't really in the scope (as that happened a bit too early).
@JM-hn6vg
@JM-hn6vg 14 күн бұрын
Carthage would have the same gods as the Philistines, or Canaanites, since Carthage was founded by Phoenicians.
@schumpeter123
@schumpeter123 13 күн бұрын
Nice the Pannonian outfit
@crimesagainsthumanity2059
@crimesagainsthumanity2059 17 күн бұрын
Alternative title: How life was like for normal people in the late Roman Empire
@Gwunderi25
@Gwunderi25 2 күн бұрын
LOL :))
@YetkhaPakoAson
@YetkhaPakoAson 8 күн бұрын
Its so crazy how the things that happened in Rome thousands of years ago namely defunding temples, mocking of old religious beliefs while not mocking weird aspects of Christianity and state sanctioned slow persecution of non Christians is actually happening right now in Nepal. Most of our leaders either are crypto Christians or have taken bribe from missionaries and now I think in my lifetime ( I m 22 btw) Hinduism and Buddhism and Mundhumism would disappear from Nepal. I am pretty sure we are on a path of becoming next Nagaland and Mizoram.
@Gwunderi25
@Gwunderi25 2 күн бұрын
I didn't know, you don't hear this in western media. Very very sad ...
@selfiekroos1777
@selfiekroos1777 21 күн бұрын
YOU HAVE WON GALILEAN 😥
@xiuhcoatl4830
@xiuhcoatl4830 14 күн бұрын
That quote is actually false
@henkstersmacro-world
@henkstersmacro-world 21 күн бұрын
👍👍👍
@DISTurbedwaffle918
@DISTurbedwaffle918 21 күн бұрын
It's interesting to note that King Numa, way back in the early decades of Rome, forbade the portrayal of the gods as humans or animals, so the removal of such depictions under Christian rule would have paradoxically made the temples look more like they would have been under the Roman monarchy.
@spartakos536
@spartakos536 10 күн бұрын
Greets from Constantinople :)
@ChannelNotFound
@ChannelNotFound 21 күн бұрын
Love thy neighbor, turn the other cheek. Forgiveness. If Jesus didn't resurrect he'd be rolling in his grave over what the Church did to the Pagans.
@florinivan6907
@florinivan6907 17 күн бұрын
There is a certain irony in how early christians were mostly nonviolent and persecuted on and off only to end up violent and highly opressive of anyone that was even mildly different. There are two reasons for this. One is the original trauma of initial persecution which got retold as being far worse than it was made christians insecure about anyone different. Two is the very basis of christian lore. The idea that a brutal apocalypse must come before the second coming. Ie if the whole world is christian then oddly something is wrong since you need opression before Christ returns. In other words you need enemies to war with nonchristians or heretical christians. This is one of the risks of favouring a group that was historically persecuted. It can easily escalate from tolerance to insecurity and violence. I still find it interesting that pagans did not try to fight it out once they saw that their numbers were dwindling. You'd think at some point someone would have decided to go down fighting rather than accept a gradual extinction.
@WinstonSmithGPT
@WinstonSmithGPT 16 күн бұрын
You may want to catch up on the history of the period.
@vondas1480
@vondas1480 7 күн бұрын
Christian persecution is a myth
@haydencrawford8552
@haydencrawford8552 12 күн бұрын
Fucking subbed. PRAISE DEUS SOL INVICTUS! PRAISE HELIOS!!
@MBP1918
@MBP1918 20 күн бұрын
Whoa
@palsada1166
@palsada1166 21 күн бұрын
Outside of pic the pagan, I don't think there is a better pagan enthusiast on KZfaq. I love it
@sotirismitzolis5171
@sotirismitzolis5171 21 күн бұрын
lt should be noted that there are theories about the Maniots (the last pagans) not practicing hellenistic paganism but slavic being the descendants of the Melingoi(slavic trbe that settled in the pelloponese around the 7th century with a high degree of autonomy), though modern DNA analysis does not support this.
@digitaldaemon74
@digitaldaemon74 Күн бұрын
I read, (I wish I had the source for conversation, that the Maniot were polythiest revivalists). They also absorbed the slavs who invaded/migrated into the Pelopenese. Later, they were converted to Christianity.
@bobbyokeefe4285
@bobbyokeefe4285 19 күн бұрын
I find this channel so reductive at times,in other words,getting lost in details and never seeing the bigger picture,kind of frustrating,oh well.
@belstar1128
@belstar1128 19 күн бұрын
16:45 a lot of people in Africa and some Asian countries still have to do that. either because of Christianity Islam or communism
@jhutfre4855
@jhutfre4855 15 күн бұрын
My thoughts exactly, that was the case during communism especially.
@battlerushiromiya651
@battlerushiromiya651 14 күн бұрын
Not really, in even extremely religious christian countries in Africa, being a polytheist generates stigma but not harsh persecution.
@carlosfilho3402
@carlosfilho3402 21 күн бұрын
Emperor Gratian Gave The Title of Pontifex Maximus To The Bishop Of Rome Hence is Called Pope.
@TheLeonhamm
@TheLeonhamm 18 күн бұрын
If the Late Roman Empire is taken to be from AD 250-550 - then in vast swathes of that ebbing and flowing imperial history relatively little changed .. for most people. True, Aurelian established an imperial Sun Cult as a genuine revivalist movement for the declining civic sense of public worship. Such Roman-era priests, however, whose candidates still bothered to take up the expense of this civil service office, were not the same as Catholic presbyters responsible for the spiritual and material welfare of a community (church or later a parish) .. they were censors, sign-diviners, and readers of entrails. This mattered to the elite, i.e. senators .. pursuing a civil career, it mattered less and increasingly less to the middle class, e.g. yeomen and military careerists .. interested in advancement (at minimal personal or family expense). For the farmer (relatively few in Italy, Sicily and Africa - among the massive slave-worked holdings of the super-rich .. devastated by Germanic intrusions and obliterated by imperial reconquest) and the householder too (villa dwellers and city-dwelling owners) the ordinary routine .. remained an ordinary routine, regardless of changes in imperial policy. Julian's attempt to make the pagan cults more Catholic-like - I know, imagine that - backfired, for the presbyteral offices were just too unlike those of the haruspices and censors, if, that is, it was to make a working effort worth the while; moreover, hecatombs had started to pall in the eyes of the philosophers, civil clerks, and military staff .. being an additional drain on hard-earned resources as well as an appalling spectacle; offerings of bread and wine, offices of hospitality and charity, and ease of state preferments by way of education not games .. won the day (the householder continued to pray for peaceful times and the farmer for the blessings of good weather). Keep the Faith; tell the truth, shame the devil, and let the demons shriek. God bless. ;o)
@kimberlyperrotis8962
@kimberlyperrotis8962 21 күн бұрын
Hi Sebastian, it was fun to see my name on your list of supporters, but could I be called an Augusta, not an Augustus? It might be time to update your Patreon level names for us gals who love late Roman history.
@theeccentrictripper3863
@theeccentrictripper3863 18 күн бұрын
Not Basileia/Basilissa? Sad Irene noises
@Stardust-xl8nn
@Stardust-xl8nn 11 күн бұрын
Late Roman Empire? The Roman Empire can be classified broadly into native Roman Empire & Christian Roman Empire. The Convert Christian Romans, destroyed their own native culture & religion and architecture, holy books & scriptures and books on various subjects. Centuries later, with reinassence, Europeans reverted to their native beliefs and became Neo Christians.
@matthewwright8995
@matthewwright8995 21 күн бұрын
Truly fascinating, I also love this channel. If you haven't already I would recommend a book 'The Darkening Age' by Catherine Nixey. It details the very violent persecution of non Christians over several centuries, almost in the style of the Taliban
@Maiorianus_Sebastian
@Maiorianus_Sebastian 19 күн бұрын
Hi Matthew, I have read the book already :) Although I have to say, I don't agree with everything she writes. Some of the things are actually contested, and there are actually also lots of examples of Christians even defending Pagans, or getting along with them. But yes, the actions of radicals unfortunately are easier to see 1600 years later :/
@matthewwright8995
@matthewwright8995 18 күн бұрын
@@Maiorianus_Sebastian Thanks, it sounds like reality was much more nuanced. I'll have to do some more reading on the subject 👍
@andreavgr
@andreavgr 15 күн бұрын
The damage the christians did to the word "Ελλην" was so great it took 1000+ years for Greeks to call themselves "Ελληνες" or Greeks again instead of "Ρωμιοι" just before the Greek Revolution began.
@UnholyWrath3277
@UnholyWrath3277 20 күн бұрын
all im saying is rome did ok until shortly after that fire was put out
@christianbolze2441
@christianbolze2441 14 күн бұрын
There are books about this. Read Deschners Criminal history of christianity.
@jody6851
@jody6851 20 күн бұрын
Imagine a documentary 2000 years from now titled: How Was Life for People Who Still Believed There Are Only Two Genders in the Late United States of America Period?" Also, too bad the video doesn't mention that the Persian Cult of Mithraism popular among Roman troops believed their cult figure Mithridates was born under the sign of a shooting star. Another very popular cult was the Egyptian Cult of Isis in which the goddess Isis was born of a virgin mother goddess, and cult worshippers would march through the streets with statues of the mother goddess cradling the newborn virgin goddess Isis. Does any of this sound familiar?
@jhutfre4855
@jhutfre4855 15 күн бұрын
you're lost...
@georgepapatheofilou6118
@georgepapatheofilou6118 20 күн бұрын
Sith happen
@belstar1128
@belstar1128 19 күн бұрын
a lot of rural people in the medieval period wanted to be both Christian and pagan at the same time like they actually believed in Jesus and the pagan gods at the same time strange but true you can still see similar believes in parts of Africa and south east Asia today but it was eventually stomped out in Europe. but even that is not certain because some old people in my area would sometimes sacrifice things to the swamp .but they didn't even know why they just said it brings good luck but it resembles Germanic and Celtic traditions. but it could have been something they made up in the 19th century for all we know
@jonathancunningham8739
@jonathancunningham8739 18 күн бұрын
Not really there are still spots that are Pagan.
@belstar1128
@belstar1128 18 күн бұрын
@@jonathancunningham8739 they are neo pagan that doesn't count
@godsowndrunk1118
@godsowndrunk1118 16 күн бұрын
Did the Romans have a BBQ after an animal sacrifice? I would think Sunday would be a good day to sacrifice a chicken, for instance....🍗
@j.t.lennon177
@j.t.lennon177 19 күн бұрын
❤‍🩹
@TheGenericavatar
@TheGenericavatar 21 күн бұрын
If you're interested in the history of Rome from founding to the fall of Italy's Roman empire (not including the Byzantine era, aka Late Roman era), check out 'The History of Rome' podcast by Mike Duncan. He also did the 'Revolutions' podcast. Both podcasts are purely audio in nature.
@colbystearns5066
@colbystearns5066 20 күн бұрын
Robin Pierson also covers the Late Roman/Byzantine era with 'The History of Byzantium.'
@Chuck44442
@Chuck44442 21 күн бұрын
I have a Question. Re. ' sacrifice animals. Yes. I know, they ask ' gods blessing. But didn't they BBQ too?? Wasn't it a big Dinner - at - the Temple??
@John_Pace
@John_Pace 21 күн бұрын
as to BBQ, the flesh of the sacrificed animals were often given to the poor.
@stephanpopp6210
@stephanpopp6210 21 күн бұрын
The meat was also sold in the market. In 1 Corinthans ch. 8, Paul refers to an argument whether Christians can eat such meat. (Answer: Yes, if nobody takes offense.)
@theeccentrictripper3863
@theeccentrictripper3863 18 күн бұрын
A ritual sacrifice usually terminated in a ritual meal, with the fat offered to the gods and the meat enjoyed by the participants, with excess being given as alms. The sacrificial economy was an entire phenomenon unto itself, I'd wager at least some of Rome's material decline had to do with this giant section of the economy getting hollowed out, along with the circus economy.
@1956priscilla
@1956priscilla 11 күн бұрын
Religion is a very peculiar phenomenon and I think it is strictly linked with social practice and the customs of the culture you live in. If all the people around you go to the temple and sacrifice to gods and think they can get something important in their lives by sacrifing to a specific god, this is what you too will do. If you love in a society with many different habits, you will probably attach to those of your family to keep a sense of belonging and identity. If the people in power oblige you to behave in a certain way, you will probably choose to obey, unless you have a strong belief
@c.sc.9353
@c.sc.9353 5 күн бұрын
with the advent of Christianity exclusivity entered the realm
@MrWolfstar8
@MrWolfstar8 20 күн бұрын
Your view of Roman religion is backwards. All the indo-European descended from a common religion that changed but retained many of the same gods as they become distinct groups during the expansion Which is why the Romans always tried to match up gods of other peoples to see if they were related or not. Jupiter/Zeus/Indra/Thor/Taranis where all the same deity from the original religion as they spread out from their homeland.
@theeccentrictripper3863
@theeccentrictripper3863 18 күн бұрын
Roman pursuit of a prisca theologia doesn't come until much later. The process of syncretization, as understood and practiced by the Romans, came from a complete certainty that their gods are the real gods, with all peoples beyond their borders worshiping derivative forms of their gods; they did not perceive themselves, or others, as worshiping variants of elder gods hitherto lost to them.
@PROOB-xq2rq
@PROOB-xq2rq 17 күн бұрын
The Roman Empire's final demise occurred after it converted to Christianity, as the fire in the temple of Vesta was put out as being 'pagan'. Related?
@genghiskhan5701
@genghiskhan5701 16 күн бұрын
Rome lasted 1000 more years in the East as Christian empire
@PROOB-xq2rq
@PROOB-xq2rq 16 күн бұрын
@@genghiskhan5701 But did it ever recover from the disastrous 4th, 5th, and 6th centuries? Even the Renovatio Imperii by Justinian only resulted in a devastated and depopulated Italy, the empire's limits stretched, and ultimately losing all those gains to the Lombards and Muslims.
@battlerushiromiya651
@battlerushiromiya651 14 күн бұрын
@@PROOB-xq2rq Rome was declining even before christianity came about, the technology at the time simply did not support such a hughe empire.
@PROOB-xq2rq
@PROOB-xq2rq 13 күн бұрын
@@battlerushiromiya651 I know, just that what I wrote sounds epic.
@stevenescover7251
@stevenescover7251 17 күн бұрын
It's very Interesting that mankind changes who and what he worships but the cult like ritual patterns continue as a species. Many gods reflect ourselves since we only recognize our behaviors in these gods which require ritual sacrifice of some living organism. It is meeting our theoretical expectations of what is required to reflect respect to these dieties. This pattern is carried into Christian rituals. Infallible Pope's, religious consuls, temples, or churches in which we have symbols to maintain focus on religious beliefs! We create saints just like Roman emperors become gods!!!! Sainthood?? Are we missing a major understanding in the concept of the here after when, in truth, we are a great component of a universality of consciousness as a process. We resort to making a mental construct based on our linear knowledge. When in truth, our immorality is like a ball of existence. Total ingretated in all life forms together being one in a total consciousness?? We are and will always be as "one." Watching this video helps make me more aware of our centuries of limited understanding of awareness of being in a purpose.
@dyskelia
@dyskelia 13 күн бұрын
It makes me sad that they couldn’t practice their religion. And to all the people saying that christianity is dying…it doesn’t seem to be. They managed to pretty much get rid of abortion in the US so that shows they still have power and followers.
@handsomeheathen4739
@handsomeheathen4739 9 күн бұрын
They haven't even come close to getting rid of abortion here. States can now ban abortion if they want to. Only one actually has as far as I know.
@kightsun
@kightsun Күн бұрын
The Arch Heretic Justinian persecuted the true (Oriental) Orthodox Church as well as pagans ironically
@martijn3015
@martijn3015 13 күн бұрын
The real question here is why was it actually Christianity that spread in the Roman Empire and not Judaism?
@theultimateshield5133
@theultimateshield5133 12 күн бұрын
Because in Judaism there is no idea pf conversion you have to be born a jew to be a jew unlike Christianity and Islam.
@kriskris998
@kriskris998 20 күн бұрын
Един Бог е известен на всички нас и това е християнския Бог. И една империя е известна на всички нас и това е Римската империя.
@Bruh-cg2fk
@Bruh-cg2fk 21 күн бұрын
lol
@Albanian_crusader
@Albanian_crusader 21 күн бұрын
The short answer is bad
@stephanpopp6210
@stephanpopp6210 21 күн бұрын
No, the shorts answer is, it took 200 years to go from ok to really bad.
@astralclub5964
@astralclub5964 21 күн бұрын
Rome had to wait for Christianity to dominate to delve into true intolerance! Believe in Jesus, the Princeof Peace, or die!
@Seer_Of_The_Woodlands
@Seer_Of_The_Woodlands 21 күн бұрын
indeed rome died. because it was built on the basis of cosmopolitan values ​​= join something bigger, but keep your own ways and thus make Rome culturally richer. when these values ​​were given up, and people started to think there are only one type of Romans, Rome collapsed. Rome collapsed as it lost its ability to assimilate the immigrant "barbarians". I suppose it was easier when both were pagans. it was once the light of the world. a place where everyone wanted.
@maverick7291
@maverick7291 21 күн бұрын
You're confused with Islam. 300 years of it's original practices and never had built armies or armed groups to conquer. Unlike Islam which started right off the bat like that. You have your narratives twisted.
@andrewward5891
@andrewward5891 21 күн бұрын
@@maverick7291- Charlemagne forced conquered people to convert to Christianity (and exterminated a German tribe he caught worshiping their old pagan gods). And the Spanish and Portuguese forcibly converted millions in the New world
@maverick7291
@maverick7291 21 күн бұрын
@@andrewward5891 Charlemagne,Spain and Portugal huh? I won't start on the subjects about them but ... Say what year was Charlemagne around? And what year did Spain and Portugal do that? And most importantly what did I say about Christianity being peacefully preached in the first 300 years of its existence? You should do your research before you open your mouth, it embarrasses you and everyone being forced to hear your foolishness.
@andrewward5891
@andrewward5891 21 күн бұрын
@@maverick7291 - Christians were an oppressed minority for 300 years then the largest but not majority religion in the Roman empire. So they weren’t able to use force to convert people until Charlemagne. Muslims were a minority religion at first too but they took over in Arabia much faster than Christians took over the Roman empire.
@gawkthimm6030
@gawkthimm6030 21 күн бұрын
also how was life for, none conforming alternate denominations of Christianity, deviating from the churches controlled from Constantinople or Rome. One thing thats often forgot is how many variations of CHristianity there were most declared heretics by church officials controlled by a monarch. Its just one of the reasons I can never support any Christian churches with strong international Hierarchies with fixed Dogmas instead of local and autonomous Christian sects open to interpret the bible according to what modern society think is important.
@Chevalierjacquesarthur
@Chevalierjacquesarthur 21 күн бұрын
Christ is God revealed in the flesh who died for our sins. All we need do is believe in his sacrifice and the Holy Spirit will change our hearts and we will have eternity with God the Father 🙏✝️ it’s very simple no need for church councils or doctrines because Christ told us all we need know in the Gospels
@gawkthimm6030
@gawkthimm6030 21 күн бұрын
@@Chevalierjacquesarthur so long as I get to pick and choose and discard any dogmatic parts that I judge to medieval. or do you think the incest parts are acceptable in modern society?
@gawkthimm6030
@gawkthimm6030 21 күн бұрын
@@Chevalierjacquesarthur en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incest_in_the_Bible
@gawkthimm6030
@gawkthimm6030 21 күн бұрын
​@@Chevalierjacquesarthur its a trick question, only things in the bible I truly believe in is; It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God. and the Bible Verses about Charity for the poor and Love for all mankind.
@misaelfraga8196
@misaelfraga8196 19 күн бұрын
To those pagans you reap what you sowed...
@darthvader6110
@darthvader6110 5 күн бұрын
Funny thing is that Muslims have 3 country inside europe . 1 bosnia 2 Albania 3 kosovo. But pagans have no country inside europe. 😂
@arnabkumarbanerjee8150
@arnabkumarbanerjee8150 17 күн бұрын
We Hindus are the last pagan of the world and yet we are majority in India. We pagans around the world whoever our gods are can join hands against abrahamic religion such as Islam, Christianity and Judaism. Islam and Christianity dominated india too but fail to destroy paganism there. We Hindus still hold the line. We would be world's largest pagan community if all pagans around the world join and form a large brotherhood. We need such solidarity in the eve of rising threat of Islam and Christianity. Think and comment
@Sleepyirishcoffee
@Sleepyirishcoffee 17 күн бұрын
Religions come and religions go. Abrahamic religions are the latest development. Paganism is mostly obsolete.
@arnabkumarbanerjee8150
@arnabkumarbanerjee8150 17 күн бұрын
@@Sleepyirishcoffee Its not obsolete. Hinduism thrives with all its colour. Besides how many archeological excavation was done on European pagan temple site ?? If we dig on grounds of Greece and rome we will re discover ancient pagan religion. Remember troy was re discovered through digging. So will be the whole religion: old religion
@Sleepyirishcoffee
@Sleepyirishcoffee 17 күн бұрын
@@arnabkumarbanerjee8150 Millions convert to abrahamic religions in India, mostly because of the injustice they face in hinduism. And if paganism was so prevalent, why did it die out? People prefer logic and rationality over fictitious beliefs. That why people in developed countries become atheists
@arnabkumarbanerjee8150
@arnabkumarbanerjee8150 17 күн бұрын
@@Sleepyirishcoffee Conversion for injustice is a cooked up story by British indologists. First of all these fictitious beliefs created huge empire big science, philosophy, literature and everything civilized man wanted ever. Christendom failed to bring almost half the world under one flag like pagan fictitious believers. So before calling paganism fictitious think again. Paganism did not die out. In India it still survives and thrives. European rural tribals may still hold pagan beliefs.
@Sleepyirishcoffee
@Sleepyirishcoffee 17 күн бұрын
@@arnabkumarbanerjee8150 Go to any convert in India, barring the ones to Islam, and most of them are either tribals or dalits who have been wronged by their community and who have felt ostracised by their very own religion. It seems disgusting that only when these people convert, people care about their plight. Secondly, nearly every religion had its own golden age, I mean the Mayans and Aztecs sacrificed children, but they were distinguished and made significant discoveries. Thirdly, no religion has united the world under one flag. I mean paganism varies from place to place, the only thing common is polytheism and worship of anything. And paganism is pretty much dead everywhere else. Hardly any pagans in europe, very few in Latin America, some in Africa, and most in Asia. But Buddhists aren't exact pagans per say. As Buddha did not preach a god, he advocated for the attainment of enlightenment through giving up materialism among other things.
@Gerasimos_slava
@Gerasimos_slava 18 күн бұрын
Christ is God and savior.☦️
@lottie1144
@lottie1144 17 күн бұрын
🙄
@jhutfre4855
@jhutfre4855 15 күн бұрын
@Gerasimos_slava There is no God.
@mango2005
@mango2005 21 күн бұрын
The poet Claudian claimed that the Statue of Victory (if not the Altar) was back in the Senate in 403. Some historians think that the emperor's removing and replacing "Victory" refers to the Altar rather than the statue. Sheridan suggests that "the fate of the Altar and Statue of Victory was finally sealed by the law of 408 against heathen statues," citing Codex Theodosianus XVI,10, 19 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altar_of_Victory
@stevenschwartz-vf2lg
@stevenschwartz-vf2lg 21 күн бұрын
Now we know why Rome fell. The ancient Gods were named from the Senate. That simplifies history a lot.
@benhardkurniawanpasaribu7018
@benhardkurniawanpasaribu7018 17 күн бұрын
Paganism are gone for good. Thank God. 😇🙏
The Ancient Greeks Who Converted to Buddhism
19:11
ReligionForBreakfast
Рет қаралды 517 М.
Roman Pagan Life and Worship
32:47
Ryan Reeves
Рет қаралды 453 М.
How many pencils can hold me up?
00:40
A4
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
ДЕНЬ РОЖДЕНИЯ БАБУШКИ #shorts
00:19
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
The Roman Cults that Rivaled Christianity
8:10
toldinstone
Рет қаралды 112 М.
History of the Thracians - Ancient Civilizations DOCUMENTARY
24:07
Kings and Generals
Рет қаралды 217 М.
Understanding the Roman Forum
13:35
toldinstone
Рет қаралды 80 М.
Napoleon Seizes Power - The Brumaire Coup
31:06
Epic History
Рет қаралды 237 М.
What did the Romans think of Constantine’s Conversion?
9:35
toldinstone
Рет қаралды 239 М.
What did the Ancient Romans eat?
37:07
Historical Adventure
Рет қаралды 14 М.
wireless switch without wires part 6
0:49
DailyTech
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Xiaomi Note 13 Pro по безумной цене в России
0:43
Простые Технологии
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН