Praise God! Celebrating you rn bro!

@@JaNoah19 thank you all praises to the Lord 🙏🏽

Praise God!

God is so good 😭

I’m so glad! ❤

To think there are more Bibles in my own house than entire communities had between them - the truth found a way hallelujah!!!

Thank you

What he doesnt tell you is the text that those men died for isnt the one you have in your new versions. Your new versions come from the very people who killed those men.

​@@jesusisking9035 KJV only cult.

@@gerrydean7696 you seem keen on keeping your catholic alexandrian gnostic text

The ones who hid the Bible from the world and burned anyone at the stake who translated it to their own language?

Which manuscripts?

All of them

@@o.o.2255 The Catholics were in Alexandria, Egypt, where agnosticism reigned? Did they transcribe the Codex Sinaiticus, which disagreed with the Codex Vaticanus no less than 8000 times? As NASA might hear: Houston, we have a problem.

@@n9wff First off, there is no problem. 1) You mean “Gnosticism?” OR “Agnostics?” Your headline narrative implies false assumptions. I’ll explain. Catholicism IS and WAS the only Christian Way of converting people, most of the bishops, priests and Christians (before 400 AD and BEFORE there was a Holy Bible of 73 books) were tortured AND killed (martyred) for the beliefs we Catholics still hold today and Protestants heretically reject, almost all 30K+ denominations, each as their own pope differently interpreting the scriptures. You should thank the Catholic church for defending the faith (1 Tim 3:15) who preserved and died for Christ and His one church. Irenaues of Lyons, Ignatius, Justin Martyr, and many others including Councils debated and considered these “Gnostics” heretics because many of their so-called “Special Knowledge” Was never taught by the apostles and these so-called hidden writings were somehow only given to them. Catholics fought these ideas. Bottom line, whether you meant Gnostics or Agnostics, Catholics were the only ones Evangelizing in Alexandria Egypt. Today, the Coptic Catholics are of the same spirit - belief unto death. Recently there were 21 Coptic Christians (Catholics) who were beheaded on a beach by Muslims. (In history, protestants hated Catholics so much, they sided with the muslims)… dont take my word for it, look it up. 2) Codex Sianiticus. Ahh yes, you must FIRST read church history BEFORE trying to call out the Catholics who were inspired by the Holy Spirit to recognize the 73 books of the bible we all enjoy today. And AFTER the 4 centuries of mortal persecutions to preserve Orthodox teachings when there was no new testament available to everyone and risked their lives to preserve and disseminate those writings to each under penalty of death. The bible is a Catholic book. A little church history below in case you were ignorant. I was like you, too and vehemently anti-Catholic UNTIL the Holy Spirit taught me these things, of which now I am sharing with you. 2a) In 367 AD, After Catholic Council of Nicaea, Bishop of Alexandria, Athanasius in his 39th (of 45 annual festal or Easter letters) recognized for the first time, 27 books of the New Testament 2b) In 382 AD, Pope Damasus for the first time decrees a single Holy Bible should be created. Thousands of manuscripts and Letters (remember, these all had to be Collected from everywhere) and adjudicated as either Accepted, Rejected, or “Uncertain.” The litmus test used was 3-fold: 2bi) Did an apostle or successor to apostle write these? 2bii) these writings ever read in the underground church in the previous 400 years?, and 2biii) Did the writings align with the Orthodox teachings passed down from apostle to apostle to apostle (Deacons, Bishops, and Elders)? If so, they were admitted as part of the 73 books of the canon. 3) The Old Testament was fairly easy to admit. All 46 books derived from the Greek Septuagint established by Jewish Greek Scribes in 250 BC decreed by King Ptolemy. All 72 scribes were separated by the King And when they finished, all 72 copies in the Library of Alexandria showed them to be nearly exactly the same. Talk about Holy Spirit Inspired. 3a) The Septuagint was the OT bible used by Paul and the apostles and in Acts 17:11 by the Bereans who all spoke Greek. 3b) The 4 Great Codices INCLUDING Codex Sianticus included those 7 Deuterocanon books which were removed from Protestant bibles in the 1880s by the British and Foreign Bible Society because it was too expensive to print AND these were converting Protestants to Catholics. THEN the Gideons widely disseminated these chopped up Protestant bibles in hotels, hospitals, schools, and prisons eluding to the historically ignorant, that Catholics added 7 books. That’s a recent lie in just past 100 years. 4) Finally, in 382, 397 & 416 at the Councils of Hippo and Cathage, respectively, the CATHOLIC CHURCH guided by the Holy Spirit determined the 73 books of the bible (46 OT and 27 NT). 4a) St Jerome, who spoke Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and Latin translated the deluge of manuscripts into one language, Latin, which was the Language of the world at the time (Greek before that and English in modern world today) into the FIRST Complete OT/NT Holy Bible, the Latin Vulgate. THEN, it was translated into the English called the Douay Rheims. 4b) The Codex Sianaticus was NOT discovered until the 19th century and therefore UNAVAILABLE to the Catholic church in the 4th Century when our Catholic monks (scribes) were painstakingly “handwriting” (no printing presses were available yet) The cost for just one complete bible then was equivalent to one full year’s salary today. They were EXPENSIVE but could have been more but the monks were not working for Money, they were working for God so they were almost free labor. So NO, we do not have a problem, Houston. We have church history facts demonstrating the infallible Bible is a Catholic book developed by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit through Christ’s one church that He established in Matthew 16:18. Today, modern Catholic and Protestant bibles rely on several sources, including the 4 Great Codices and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Bibles are translated into 3 major categories: 4ai) Word for Word 4aii) Idea for Idea 4aiii) Phrase for Phrase I hope this helps with some if your ignorance (and many other protestants - I was one of them for nearly 30 years until just a few years ago.) So pray about who has changed and who has always been the same. Who preserved the faith and continued Orthodox teachings in early history, even unto torture and death. It was Christ’s true and single church, the Catholic church 2,000+ years ago. Protestantism began in mid 1500s and only 500 years old. IF ITS TRUE, IT’S PROBABLY NOT NEW, IF ITS NEW, ITS PROBABLY NOT TRUE

Were you paying attention at all? There can be no very word of God under this system.

men's words... haha

The Catholic Church preserved the word of god that’s a fact Luther took out 7 books and changed doctrine so if you are a denominations you can be certain you haven’t got the preserved word of god based on a truth of reality.

@JosephBelloo Thanks for your opinion now I will give you truth Jesus Christ gave his authority to peter to build his church the bible was put together by the Catholic Church in the 3rd century Christianity didn’t change till the 16th century when a Catholic priest Martin Luther stripped down the bible and created traditions of men(denominations) the rapture is a false 19th century doctrine not based on scripture and divided even amongst the denominations.If you want to follow and understand Christ join his church the one,holy,apostolic Catholic Church

@JosephBelloo Just checked them out sounds interesting but the truth is you broke from Christ’s authoritive church and judging by you saying rapture your making up your own interpretation that tells me your faith is just another denomination outside the Catholic Church

AMEN!!! 🙌

Amen I am one of them

You would learn more Truth from Tovia Singer!!!

Amen and keep praying for your Catholic friend too.

@@rinihogewoning6528 thank you! And we will pray for you as well.

Check out the debate with Dr. White and Patrick Madrid(Catholic) on sola scriptura.

Heard the same devate….folloeed Tim Staples ever since

Jesus started Catholic church

lol, Dr. James White is a profound example of wasted energy in terms of Bible battle. He is a very miserable individual because he FAILED BIG TIME to annihilate KJV onlyism as he enthusiastically predicted it in his prime, full of vigor, and with a determined confidence. He lost the battle and his hair. KJV continues to thrive in the 21st century throughout the world, one proof that indeed it's the PURE, PRECISE, and PERFECT words of God. And all modern bibles are defective, deceitful, and fake bibles.

@@timkhan3238 Perfect comment, that guy loves all mistranslations and hates the Word of God.

There are no original "autographs", historical inaccuracies abound, translation inaccuracies are blatant (Greek from Hebrew), several books of the NT are forgeries, scribes changed various passages through the years and there are many "gospels" and Gnostic writings extant that were not included in the canon. I noticed Dr. White didn't discuss any of this nor did he discuss any writings prior to the 3rd century AD.

The reason I believe in the God of the Bible, the inerrancy of Scripture and that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration and not from men alone. The super natural events are important in that they show the divine nature of God. Jesus Christ cast out demons, healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more miracles than what are recorded in the Bible/Gospels and that it would have filled volumes of books upon books were he to have written them all down and that it would have taken more than one lifetime to do so. The claim that men wrote the Bible so it can not be true means that no other book ever written should be believed, no matter the topic as they're all written by man. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of books written over a period of thousands of years of which all those books are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word given to them by God. 66 Volumes/Books in the Bible. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. The New Testament cannon, (Gospels of the Apostles/writings, Epistles/letters to the early Churches, all sources and eyewitness accounts that were to be included), was decided at the Synod of Carthage in 397 AD. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" about the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. An intelligent person knows that the scientific method can not be applied to verify the Bible. Scientific Method is: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from the time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue? If they had/have why is there no record found anywhere of it ever being disproven? Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and were present/saw the signs/miracles He performed. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end due to age and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Mathew = Was written to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more references to the Old Testament in his gospel compared to the others. Peter = He lays out all the proof for the Bible and it's accuracy in 1 Peter Chapter 1. He makes the arguments that justify it all as truly what happened and that it all happened as recorded in the Gospels, the entire Bible. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him that came from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostles after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. There have been over 25,000 archeological digs in which there has been absolutely no evidence found that proves anything in the entire Bible false but in those digs many things have been found that prove it true. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate people, places, wars and many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false but they do strengthen it. Word for Word Translations prove just how accurate what we have is when you consider there's no way anyone could have falsified any of it, be it via intent or mistakes. Many church fathers in history have made extensive notes that include scripture throughout the centuries and no matter the time or place all those references to scripture corroborate each other. Which shows just how accurate translations have been throughout time and still are as long as they maintain a word for word ideology during the translation. To falsify any of it they would have to change every single source, do it in three languages, on three continents, over a span of thousands of years, with no one catching any of it, no one ever talking about what they'd done, leaving behind no traces that they'd done it. Not to mention they'd have to steal all of those sources to change them, changing them would be a massive undertaking considering they were hand written in those times and then put them back without ever being seen or caught during the entire process. My last statement is this: Simply put the Bible can defend itself like a lion just let it loose. (Use Scripture to defend Scripture because it is a collection of eyewitness accounts that has been proven true again and again). There's a very good movie titled "The God Who Speaks" that covers much of what I've said above. If you still have doubt I would recommend you watch it and even if you don't because it was very well made and presented. Take care and God Bless.

Yeah I wonder who it was who was copying the texts throughout the first 3 centuries. It wasn’t Protestants

Actually it’s 81 total books.

@@everythingdefensivecarry1108 Umm No, the Cannon was ratified in Carthage 397 AD. So according to that council and church fathers there are only 66 books included in the Bible. They reached that determination after years of debate. The reason the "lost books" weren't included in the cannon was due to there being to hard to prove, to many variations existing that were supposed to be authentic, authorship, or divine inspiration ie far to many errors in them to be inspired by the Holy Spirit. Look into church history and you will find the details of what I'm letting you know. Take care and God Bless.

The Bible was not to be translated from the Latin. Until the 1960's only priests could read the Bible on local churches. Till then the Catholic church in the West condemned the men who translated the Bible into English. The men like Tyndale and others were hung or else burned at the stake.

@gregorybezanson this is completely false. There was a small period in history when lay people were not permitted to read certain translations of the Bible, and some translations have been ordered to be burned at different times. But this does not mean the Bible was only in Latin or people were never permitted to read the Bible on their ow. It is also very important to remember that prior to the invention of the printing press, Bibles were handwritten with painstaking care, usually by monks. Pages were adorned with artwork and covered with gold leaf. Each Bible was devoutly respected and cared for and read daily to the faithful Catholics. These Bibles were as priceless as the words of eternal life written within these works of art. Latin was not a way to keep the Bible from people. Rather, it was the best way to efficiently reproduce Bibles by hand and have it be understood by the greatest number of people around the world. Additionally, most people that could read, read Latin. This was the language of science, literature, government and religion for centuries. Far from keeping written Bibles from people, we have examples where the church went to great lengths to bring the written word to non-latin speaking cultures. Ufilas, a Catholic Bishop in the 4th century, worked with Germanic tribes in Europe to create a Written language, and taught many of them to read, so that they could have a written account of the Gospels and pass the Good News on for generations. This trend of Catholic missionaries creating written languages for ethnic groups in order to provide them a written gospel was not a single isolated event either. Ethnic Groups in Russia and Armenia owe written Gospels to Catholic missionaries. Although the invention of the printing press greatly reduced cost in comparison to earlier hand written copies, they were still worth several thousand dollars (in today’s money), and still not accessible to the common man. Scholars that have studied the Gutenberg Bible and its history add that "It is assumed that most were sold to monasteries, universities and particularly wealthy individuals" (Kapr, Albert (1996). Johann Gutenberg: The Man and His Invention)." Nonetheless, there was still demand for the printed word of God. Therefore, the Church approved of 200+ Vulgate Bibles to be printed. In fact, these were the first books to be printed on Gutenberg's printing press. Furthermore, these Catholic Bibles were in such high demand that they were all sold before they could even be completed. Many of these early Bibles were allowed to be carefully translated and printed in the various languages of Catholic Europe. The Douay-Rheims, an English translation of the Bible, was printed and approved for sale prior to the first King James version. These newly printed Bibles in varius local languages received high praise. Pope Pius II publicly supported the translations and distribution of the Bibles in various languages. History simply does not support these silly lies you have been told.

So the individuals that weren’t catholic don’t get a thanks? Lol …

@@jdizle1178 not sure of any that helped preserve Scripture in its entirety. I will thank Protestants today for their love of their Scripture and willingness to share Scripture.

@@gregorybezanson Who said it was not to be translated into Latin? In the NT itself on the Crucifix the NT itself speaks of 3 languages, Hebrew, Latin and Greek (John 19:19-20). Tyndale was not killed because he translated the Bible into English, it was that his translation was full of errors. Even after King Henry the VIII broke from Rome, he condemned Tyndale's translation and ordered it should be be used for the services in the Protestant church of England (Anglicans).

Brainwashing by professionally trained Christian hustlers is so cool. Hebrew myths are the only ancient myths that are real? How educated are you, Stupid? Type Bible Criticism online and find out.

MR,....Yes, he is a fantastic speaker.

True servants of God are rarely recognized. But their work lives on.

Your sick in the head.

Noticed your profile pic, can you please explain it ?

@@FatherSonSpirit1 Sure. I do translations and commentary of ancient non-canonical and gnostic texts from a Reformed Christian perspective.

Most things are worth more than my car lol

Praying

The ESV makes the LORD Jesus a lair check John 7: 8-10, check Col 1:14 there is no blood. God bless you, sister.

@@JoseSalloum Sister Tajji, please don't listen to these people. They like to spread lies to promote their propaganda of King James Onlyism. They believe the King James is the only authorized version that should be considered the word of God. This is laughable false, and there are many debates online that show this plainly. I made the switch from NKJV to ESV a few years back and haven't looked back since. Still love the KJV and NKJV for it's beauty of language, but accuracy to the original is a wholly different story. Don't let people like this confuse you. God bless!

Get the Authorized Version (KJV).

You must know that God our Father and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, that although He hates the sin, He loves the sinner. If they will just come to Him and repent in their heart of hearts of all their sins, and proclaim Him as their Savior, their Lord, the Son of GOD. The reason I believe in the God of the Bible, the inerrancy of Scripture and that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration and not from men alone. The super natural events are important in that they show the divine nature of God. Jesus Christ cast out demons, healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more miracles than what are recorded in the Bible/Gospels and that it would have filled volumes of books upon books were he to have written them all down and that it would have taken more than one lifetime to do so. The claim that men wrote the Bible so it can not be true means that no other book ever written should be believed, no matter the topic as they're all written by man. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of books written over a period of thousands of years of which all those books are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word given to them by God. 66 Volumes/Books in the Bible. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. The New Testament cannon, (Gospels of the Apostles/writings, Epistles/letters to the early Churches, all sources and eyewitness accounts that were to be included), was decided at the Synod of Carthage in 397 AD. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" about the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. An intelligent person knows that the scientific method can not be applied to verify the Bible. Scientific Method is: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from the time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue? If they had/have why is there no record found anywhere of it ever being disproven? Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and saw some of the many signs/miracles He performed. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Mathew = Was written to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more than a few references to the Old Testament in his gospels. Peter = He lays out all the proof for the Bible and it's accuracy in 1 Peter Chapter 1. He makes the arguments that justify it all as truly what happened and that it all happened as recorded in the Gospels, the entire Bible. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him that came from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostles after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. There have been over 25,000 archeological digs in which there has been absolutely no evidence found that proves anything in the entire Bible false but in those digs many things have been found that prove it true. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate people, places, wars and many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false but they do strengthen it. Word for Word Translations prove just how accurate what we have is when you consider there's no way anyone could have falsified any of it, be it via intent or mistakes. Many church fathers in history have made extensive notes that include scripture throughout the centuries and no matter the time or place all those references to scripture corroborate each other. Which shows just how accurate translations have been throughout time and still are as long as they maintain a word for word ideology during the translation. To falsify any of it they would have to change every single source, do it in three languages, on three continents, over a span of thousands of years, with no one catching any of it, no one ever talking about what they'd done, leaving behind no traces that they'd done it. Not to mention they'd have to steal all of those sources to change them, changing them would be a massive undertaking considering they were hand written in those times and then put them back without ever being seen or caught during the entire process. My last statement is this: Simply put the Bible can defend itself like a lion just let it loose. (Use Scripture to defend Scripture because it is a collection of eyewitness accounts that has been proven true again and again). There's a very good movie titled "The God Who Speaks" that covers much of what I've said above. If you still have doubt I would recommend you watch it and even if you don't because it was very well made and presented. Take care and God Bless.@@JoseSalloum

Relax Helen

Yes, Rome gave you your bible. Arrius Piso and his family members wrote the entire NT plus Esther and Josephus. He called himself the ALPHA and OMEGA as his name starts with A for Alpha and ends with O for Omega. His relative, Flavius Titus, called himself the son of man.

@@QuestionThingsUseLogic bro you need to take off your tin foil hat. Thats not even close to true lmao

@@dylanfreeman9160 you need to say that to the historical scholars who have researched this. And I'm talking *serious* historical scholars. Historians no longer spend much time discussing Abraham or Moses, on the grounds that they are clearly mythical. To give one example, K. L. Noll just says in Canaan and Israel in Antiquity: A Textbook on History and Religion, “Abraham and Moses are fictitious characters”. "I’ll start with what most historians believe regarding Moses, because if Moses did not exist and the Israelites were never sojourned in Egypt, the link is broken and Abraham, by default never really existed. After two hundred years of searching and never finding a scrap of evidence that the Israelite people fled from Egypt in a great biblical Exodus, nearly all historians now say the Exodus never occurred-Israelites were local Canaanite people and the Exodus story was just a foundation myth. There is no evidence for any of the events surrounding the purported Exodus from Egypt and therefore no evidence that the biblical Moses ever existed." Maybe you need to take off *your* tin foil hat and face some actual facts.

Got mine from God...😊

@@QuestionThingsUseLogicthe exodus can still be true without any “evidence”. if we had proof then that would mean for certain that it happened, if we don’t (besides the written text) then that does NOT mean it didn’t happen. it means that it could have, or couldn’t have and we have to look further to make that decision based on other things. there are many historical events that don’t have “evidence” of them happening but we believe them because they were written about

That is incredible. We are so blessed in the countries where we can get them so easily and affordably.

He does satans work not Gods work

@@AstariahFox easy to accuse without proof I suppose. Pretty sure the Bible is against such actions.

@@HearGodsWord trinity is the biggest deception. Christendom have influenced many killings of people who denied the trinity It's all about power and control over people They had jesus killed cause he spoke out against there traditions and hypocrisy in his day and it's still going on today in Christendom At one point in history it meant death to those who taught against the trinity Christendom is evil and works for satan . He has Christendom under his control It's all gonna be destroyed Jehovah is gonna destroy Babylon the great which represents world empire of false religion Hes giving us a warning to flee from it

@@HearGodsWord he’s a heretic Represents Another American man made “religion “

@@HearGodsWord not sure about him “doing satans work” but he is definitely deceived as are so many. The many corrupt modern translation “bibles” are a huge part of the problem. It actually blows my mind that people don’t see a problem with almost 200 different versions of the Bible in English alone. Stick with The King James and you will have God’s preserved Bible.

You are welcome my child

Audio's not too good, though.

Audio has many problem places

Sounds like someone is stapling papers. I was listening and not watching and it reminded me of one of my college professors who would talk and staple all class long. Good times.

@@EricBadong no bass

you mean the reformers

@@Trump_Lake_24 No, they corrupted it

@@PatrickInCayman just catch up on your reading from post Catholic Luther and Augustine , you know, fathers of the Protestant movement . If not for the reformers Protestants exposing Roman Catholicism Europe would still be in the dark ages . Basic Church History

@@Trump_Lake_24absolutely not. You may have your faulty opinions about the righteousness of the Catholics or the Protestant Deformers, but it’s plainly historical and silly to deny that the Catholic Church compiled Sacred Scripture and defined the canon.

@pio5119 Mystery Babylon is only a mystery to those who drink of her cup.

Why is Jesus appearing to your Muslim brothers in dreams?

You must know that God our Father and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, that although He hates the sin, He loves the sinner. If they will just come to Him and repent in their heart of hearts of all their sins, and proclaim Him as their Savior, their Lord, the Son of GOD. The reason I believe in the God of the Bible, the inerrancy of Scripture and that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration and not from men alone. The super natural events are important in that they show the divine nature of God. Jesus Christ cast out demons, healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more miracles than what are recorded in the Bible/Gospels and that it would have filled volumes of books upon books were he to have written them all down and that it would have taken more than one lifetime to do so. The claim that men wrote the Bible so it can not be true means that no other book ever written should be believed, no matter the topic as they're all written by man. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of books written over a period of thousands of years of which all those books are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word given to them by God. 66 Volumes/Books in the Bible. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. The New Testament cannon, (Gospels of the Apostles/writings, Epistles/letters to the early Churches, all sources and eyewitness accounts that were to be included), was decided at the Synod of Carthage in 397 AD. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" about the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. An intelligent person knows that the scientific method can not be applied to verify the Bible. Scientific Method is: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from the time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue? If they had/have why is there no record found anywhere of it ever being disproven? Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and were present/saw the signs/miracles He performed. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end due to age and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Mathew = Was written to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more references to the Old Testament in his gospel compared to the others. Peter = He lays out all the proof for the Bible and it's accuracy in 1 Peter Chapter 1. He makes the arguments that justify it all as truly what happened and that it all happened as recorded in the Gospels, the entire Bible. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him that came from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostles after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. There have been over 25,000 archeological digs in which there has been absolutely no evidence found that proves anything in the entire Bible false but in those digs many things have been found that prove it true. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate people, places, wars and many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false but they do strengthen it. Word for Word Translations prove just how accurate what we have is when you consider there's no way anyone could have falsified any of it, be it via intent or mistakes. Many church fathers in history have made extensive notes that include scripture throughout the centuries and no matter the time or place all those references to scripture corroborate each other. Which shows just how accurate translations have been throughout time and still are as long as they maintain a word for word ideology during the translation. To falsify any of it they would have to change every single source, do it in three languages, on three continents, over a span of thousands of years, with no one catching any of it, no one ever talking about what they'd done, leaving behind no traces that they'd done it. Not to mention they'd have to steal all of those sources to change them, changing them would be a massive undertaking considering they were hand written in those times and then put them back without ever being seen or caught during the entire process. My last statement is this: Simply put the Bible can defend itself like a lion just let it loose. (Use Scripture to defend Scripture because it is a collection of eyewitness accounts that has been proven true again and again). There's a very good movie titled "The God Who Speaks" that covers much of what I've said above. If you still have doubt I would recommend you watch it and even if you don't because it was very well made and presented. Take care and God Bless.

The bible: edited, redacted, added into...all by ruling royalty to keep us slaves.

Granite…lol. He is the rock after all. 😂

The papacy is from Christ. Those men rebelled against God

The empower Diocetian also destroyed the scriptures--all that he could find-- in his realm.

Lol. You can thank the Catholic Church for compiling the canon of Scripture under the guidance of the Holy Ghost. If not for His Church, you wouldn’t have the Bible at all, even the butchered translations of heresiarchs.

@pio5119 I think you meant to say “butchered heresiarchs” You know the ones that were dismembered and butchered on racks; the ones who had the Iron Maiden enclosed upon them; the ones written about in Fox’s Book of Martyrs and Martyrs Mirror. Some day you will get to meet them and you’ll see your whorish Mother’s dogma was not about truth but Satanic world domination. By the way, if the Lord has a bride, who is chaste and afflicted while sojourning in this world while being faithful to Him who gave Himself for her, who per say would be Satan’s bride? She who holds the cup and bag?

not protestant canon,so go away,talk about YOUR canon somewhere

@@ManlyServant “go talk about the true canon elsewhere, we enjoy ours which is missing books!” lol

You must know that God our Father and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, that although He hates the sin, He loves the sinner. If they will just come to Him and repent in their heart of hearts of all their sins, and proclaim Him as their Savior, their Lord, the Son of GOD. The reason I believe in the God of the Bible, the inerrancy of Scripture and that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration and not from men alone. The super natural events are important in that they show the divine nature of God. Jesus Christ cast out demons, healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more miracles than what are recorded in the Bible/Gospels and that it would have filled volumes of books upon books were he to have written them all down and that it would have taken more than one lifetime to do so. The claim that men wrote the Bible so it can not be true means that no other book ever written should be believed, no matter the topic as they're all written by man. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of books written over a period of thousands of years of which all those books are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word given to them by God. 66 Volumes/Books in the Bible. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. The New Testament cannon, (Gospels of the Apostles/writings, Epistles/letters to the early Churches, all sources and eyewitness accounts that were to be included), was decided at the Synod of Carthage in 397 AD. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" about the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. An intelligent person knows that the scientific method can not be applied to verify the Bible. Scientific Method is: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from the time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue? If they had/have why is there no record found anywhere of it ever being disproven? Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and were present/saw the signs/miracles He performed. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end due to age and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Mathew = Was written to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more references to the Old Testament in his gospel compared to the others. Peter = He lays out all the proof for the Bible and it's accuracy in 1 Peter Chapter 1. He makes the arguments that justify it all as truly what happened and that it all happened as recorded in the Gospels, the entire Bible. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him that came from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostles after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. There have been over 25,000 archeological digs in which there has been absolutely no evidence found that proves anything in the entire Bible false but in those digs many things have been found that prove it true. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate people, places, wars and many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false but they do strengthen it. Word for Word Translations prove just how accurate what we have is when you consider there's no way anyone could have falsified any of it, be it via intent or mistakes. Many church fathers in history have made extensive notes that include scripture throughout the centuries and no matter the time or place all those references to scripture corroborate each other. Which shows just how accurate translations have been throughout time and still are as long as they maintain a word for word ideology during the translation. To falsify any of it they would have to change every single source, do it in three languages, on three continents, over a span of thousands of years, with no one catching any of it, no one ever talking about what they'd done, leaving behind no traces that they'd done it. Not to mention they'd have to steal all of those sources to change them, changing them would be a massive undertaking considering they were hand written in those times and then put them back without ever being seen or caught during the entire process. My last statement is this: Simply put the Bible can defend itself like a lion just let it loose. (Use Scripture to defend Scripture because it is a collection of eyewitness accounts that has been proven true again and again). There's a very good movie titled "The God Who Speaks" that covers much of what I've said above. If you still have doubt I would recommend you watch it and even if you don't because it was very well made and presented. Take care and God Bless.

You aren't allowed to reveal that truth here.

@@ManlyServant How do you know your canon?

The writers of the Bible. The Catholic Church has the fullness of the Truth

You must know that God our Father and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, that although He hates the sin, He loves the sinner. If they will just come to Him and repent in their heart of hearts of all their sins, and proclaim Him as their Savior, their Lord, the Son of GOD. The reason I believe in the God of the Bible, the inerrancy of Scripture and that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration and not from men alone. The super natural events are important in that they show the divine nature of God. Jesus Christ cast out demons, healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more miracles than what are recorded in the Bible/Gospels and that it would have filled volumes of books upon books were he to have written them all down and that it would have taken more than one lifetime to do so. The claim that men wrote the Bible so it can not be true means that no other book ever written should be believed, no matter the topic as they're all written by man. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of books written over a period of thousands of years of which all those books are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word given to them by God. 66 Volumes/Books in the Bible. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. The New Testament cannon, (Gospels of the Apostles/writings, Epistles/letters to the early Churches, all sources and eyewitness accounts that were to be included), was decided at the Synod of Carthage in 397 AD. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" about the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. An intelligent person knows that the scientific method can not be applied to verify the Bible. Scientific Method is: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from the time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue? If they had/have why is there no record found anywhere of it ever being disproven? Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and were present/saw the signs/miracles He performed. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end due to age and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Mathew = Was written to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more references to the Old Testament in his gospel compared to the others. Peter = He lays out all the proof for the Bible and it's accuracy in 1 Peter Chapter 1. He makes the arguments that justify it all as truly what happened and that it all happened as recorded in the Gospels, the entire Bible. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him that came from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostles after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. There have been over 25,000 archeological digs in which there has been absolutely no evidence found that proves anything in the entire Bible false but in those digs many things have been found that prove it true. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate people, places, wars and many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false but they do strengthen it. Word for Word Translations prove just how accurate what we have is when you consider there's no way anyone could have falsified any of it, be it via intent or mistakes. Many church fathers in history have made extensive notes that include scripture throughout the centuries and no matter the time or place all those references to scripture corroborate each other. Which shows just how accurate translations have been throughout time and still are as long as they maintain a word for word ideology during the translation. To falsify any of it they would have to change every single source, do it in three languages, on three continents, over a span of thousands of years, with no one catching any of it, no one ever talking about what they'd done, leaving behind no traces that they'd done it. Not to mention they'd have to steal all of those sources to change them, changing them would be a massive undertaking considering they were hand written in those times and then put them back without ever being seen or caught during the entire process. My last statement is this: Simply put the Bible can defend itself like a lion just let it loose. (Use Scripture to defend Scripture because it is a collection of eyewitness accounts that has been proven true again and again). There's a very good movie titled "The God Who Speaks" that covers much of what I've said above. If you still have doubt I would recommend you watch it and even if you don't because it was very well made and presented. Take care and God Bless.

He is a narcissist, a Calvinist, and a poor debater in general. He is a "Church of me" guy in direct defiance of the Bible. He also does a lot of misleading in this talk and he knows it.

@@cjr4497 That is a big claim. What do you have to back that up? If you're going to go to the trouble of responding to my comment, surely you have some videos or previous experiences to share?

JW can claim this all he wants. At the end of the day there is one infallible voice for binding matters to the church and it isn’t him. JW deceives us and needs to resign his “job”. We all whether we like it or not, assume the Church Hierarchy gave us the canon, and if you don’t, you immediately imply that another watered down hierarchy did it

@@BoereworsRoll People that don't like him, really don't like him. They are usually Catholics.

​@@BoereworsRollWatch his debate with Trent Horn on salvation and also give his debate with Patrick Madrid a listen. Come to your own conclusions

That’s what you got out of this? Lol, he tells a story about one of the guys having to dedicate the translation so he doesn’t get burned.

Ya but he said the catholic guy questioned the catholic churches position ? So he wasn't ok with them as a catholic..

What? no it doesn't😂

It was the Catholic Church that compiled the Bible, but, that’s not where the word Bible comes from

Read She Rides the Beast by Dave Hunt. Great book that is sourced by the RCC itself exposing its own lies. You were given a myth and the RCC knows the truth except its members.

@@sunnydays8270 I wasn’t given anything, by the grace of God I read my way into the Church. I discovered that all the doctrines of the Church are found among the Early Church and the Fathers; all of Scripture points to Catholic doctrine and ecclesiology. The false version of Christianity full of lies is what I assume is your own: Protestant? There is only one Church established by Christ Himself, and Protestantism pridefully split from that Body. Protestant doctrines are found nowhere in the Early Church, and can only be found in Scripture by doing violence to the text and misinterpreting it.

It would be far too Catholic for many

@@daddydaycareky Well, The Catholics put the Bible together. Tis History.

@@cindiloowhoo1166 agreed. I think many people would be shocked to learn this fact.

Is there anything else you'd like to be smug and proud of?

A Lamp in the Dark by Christian Pinto.

You must know that God our Father and our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the Lord of Lords and King of Kings, that although He hates the sin, He loves the sinner. If they will just come to Him and repent in their heart of hearts of all their sins, and proclaim Him as their Savior, their Lord, the Son of GOD. The reason I believe in the God of the Bible, the inerrancy of Scripture and that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. We have a reliable collection of historical documents written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report super natural events that took place in fulfilment of specific prophecies and claim that their writings are via divine inspiration and not from men alone. The super natural events are important in that they show the divine nature of God. Jesus Christ cast out demons, healed the sick, blind, deaf, dumb and paralyzed, walked on water, fed thousands with little, and was resurrected all of which have eyewitness accounts. The feedings alone were witnessed by the thousands He fed on the two separate occasions that we are told of in the Gospels. John tells us that there were many more miracles than what are recorded in the Bible/Gospels and that it would have filled volumes of books upon books were he to have written them all down and that it would have taken more than one lifetime to do so. The claim that men wrote the Bible so it can not be true means that no other book ever written should be believed, no matter the topic as they're all written by man. The Bible is not just a book it is a collection of books written over a period of thousands of years of which all those books are linked together by One Divine Author. In this collection of books there are over 40 authors but only one Devine Author who links them all together via the Holy Spirit. Those authors wrote down His inspired Word given to them by God. 66 Volumes/Books in the Bible. The bulk of the New Testament was written over a period of around 50 years. It was in 49 AD to 53 AD when the Scripture writings of the New Testament are thought to have begun. With the last living Apostle John dying in 100 AD. Over a period of around 1500 years it was preserved and passed on: In 3 Languages On 3 Continents There are 66,360+ source documents that have been found for the entire Bible of which there are 24,360 and counting source documents for the New Testament alone. 5,839 in the original Greek, some 2 million pages 18,524 translations of that Greek into other languages Some of the oldest sources date to 125AD which is within decades of the completion of all the books that were canonized as the New Testament. The New Testament cannon, (Gospels of the Apostles/writings, Epistles/letters to the early Churches, all sources and eyewitness accounts that were to be included), was decided at the Synod of Carthage in 397 AD. Those asking for "Scientific Proof" about the Bible are either ignorant or asking with evil intent. An intelligent person knows that the scientific method can not be applied to verify the Bible. Scientific Method is: 1) Has to be observable. 2) Has to be measurable. 3) Has to be repeatable. Therefore no history can ever be proven via scientific method. You must use the historical method based on: Eyewitnesses accounts. Documents from the time or as close as possible. Make sure the story is corroborated by as many sources as possible. Look for anyone/anything that attempted to prove any of it false in that time period or as close to it as possible. Did anyone successfully prove any of it untrue? If they had/have why is there no record found anywhere of it ever being disproven? Luke = Historian A man of science, a physician, an educated and logical man who researched and gathered the accounts of eyewitnesses. He recorded the actual eyewitness accounts of our Lord and Savior, those who had heard Him speak and were present/saw the signs/miracles He performed. He did this because the life of those eyewitnesses were coming to an end due to age and he was inspired to write them down via the Holy Spirit before they could be lost or perverted by time. John = Evangelist John is organized around 7 specific events/signs/miracles all seen by eyewitnesses and corroborated by many. So he also provides proof of accuracy/truth. Mark = The shortest of the Gospels and is very direct or "Just the Facts" if you like. Mathew = Was written to the Jewish audience and that's one of the reasons for the extensive genealogy of Christ. There are also more references to the Old Testament in his gospel compared to the others. Peter = He lays out all the proof for the Bible and it's accuracy in 1 Peter Chapter 1. He makes the arguments that justify it all as truly what happened and that it all happened as recorded in the Gospels, the entire Bible. All of the Apostles were eyewitnesses of Jesus and/or of the resurrected Christ. Including Paul whom Jesus came to as he was on the road traveling to Damascus to persecute more Christians. This would have been the resurrected Christ or a form of Him that came from Heaven. There were at least 300 eyewitnesses still alive when Corinthians was written who could have disputed it but no one did. Mathias became the 12th Apostles after Judas hung himself so the argument of there not being 12 Apostles comes from ignorance or evil intent. There have been over 25,000 archeological digs in which there has been absolutely no evidence found that proves anything in the entire Bible false but in those digs many things have been found that prove it true. Other cultures and non believer's historical documents show or corroborate people, places, wars and many things that are in the Bible. Yet none of them prove any of it to be false but they do strengthen it. Word for Word Translations prove just how accurate what we have is when you consider there's no way anyone could have falsified any of it, be it via intent or mistakes. Many church fathers in history have made extensive notes that include scripture throughout the centuries and no matter the time or place all those references to scripture corroborate each other. Which shows just how accurate translations have been throughout time and still are as long as they maintain a word for word ideology during the translation. To falsify any of it they would have to change every single source, do it in three languages, on three continents, over a span of thousands of years, with no one catching any of it, no one ever talking about what they'd done, leaving behind no traces that they'd done it. Not to mention they'd have to steal all of those sources to change them, changing them would be a massive undertaking considering they were hand written in those times and then put them back without ever being seen or caught during the entire process. My last statement is this: Simply put the Bible can defend itself like a lion just let it loose. (Use Scripture to defend Scripture because it is a collection of eyewitness accounts that has been proven true again and again). There's a very good movie titled "The God Who Speaks" that covers much of what I've said above. If you still have doubt I would recommend you watch it and even if you don't because it was very well made and presented. Take care and God Bless.

If he did that he would have to admit the canon of the Bible came from the Catholic Church.

Apparently both Augustine and Eusibius said that the N.T. was put together by the end of the 1st century. The book of Acts says that the Word of the Lord was published during that time. It does add up that we would have to wait 300 years until the Bible as a whole would be available.

He's done that a lot elsewhere.

When was it compiled in the 4th century?

He supports apostasy.

@@AstariahFox No he's not a believer of Roman Catholicism.

@@mikemccormick9667 hes not even a Christian and a bible believer

@@AstariahFox Why because he believes Calvinism?

@@mikemccormick9667 no he doesn't believe the bible and what it actually teaches Same with all christendom. False religion will be destroyed

Brainwashing is such fun!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No education, eh Rube?

good luck and God bless you sister!!

God bless you. You are teaching our future as you know and with the way things are going in public and even many private schools, they maybe the only well taught people around. Thank you for giving your time and energy to something so important.