Gotta get that 4D effect.

He's watching Gal Gadot, dude. He's going to sit REAL close. You know, to examine the detail in WW's armor and ricocheting bullet sparks.

For the movie theater-like FOV

There is usually one humorous comment per video, I look for it.

@@darylcheshire1618 We got two in this one. I feel spoiled.

20,000 dimming zones is NOT impressive whatsoever. 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂 4K has over 8 million pixels. 20,000 zones is nowhere near enough to cover 8 million+ pixels. The LCD TV that came the closest to OLED's contrast ratio is the now-discontinued Hisense U9DG Dual Cell LCD 4K TV which has over 2 MILLION local dimming zones thanks to its secondary 1080p grayscale panel.

@@PSYCHOV3N0M that’s why it’s mini LED and not microLED If you had as many local dimming zones as pixels, It’s literally the next technology🙄 and right now that next technology cost over $100,000, so… And as for being accurate - I don’t think we should call it “4K TV”- to me that would mean 4000 x 4000 = 16M pixels. In fact it’s 3840 x 2160 pixels (which doesn’t even have any relationship to 4K anything) = 8.3M pixels. We should be calling it 8.3M TV in my opinion…

Perfectly said !!!

@@kineahora8736 The naming "4K" does not refer to the resolution but to the horizontal pixel count. It derives from "DCI 4K" (Digital Cinema Initiatives) which has a resolution of 4096×2160! 3840x2160 is the resolution that is used in the consumer market because it keeps the 16:9 aspect ratio...

@@RedLeo-pf9yo NOT exactly!

*ding*

that IMPACT

Great comment…👍🏾

There is some charm still to a projector, you don’t have to squint to protect your retinas when explosions happen on screen 😎

Nothing wrong with being excited about a tiny 115 inch tv, but thinking it puts projectors in trouble is lunacy. 1. The tv costs $20,000 for a 115 inch screen. I bought a brand new Bbianlyy native 4k projector for $189. It comes with bluetooth, electronic keystone, hdr10 support and I get a 151 inch screen. 2. You need a crane to transport that heavy monstrosity to your house and at least two men to install it. I caried my projector home in my backpack, set it on a shelf and was watching it 5 minute after I got home. 3. The bigger the tv screen, the more annoying reflections you have to del with. haven't had a reflection issue since 2017. 4. The TCL will always be a niche product that will not appeal to the average consumer. The best selling tv' on Amazon is a Vizio 40 inch that sold 10,000 units last month, The TCL 65 inch moved 8000 units. The best selling projector was the Happrun 1080p that moved over 10,000 units last month and costs $69.00. With budget 4k projector prices dropping in price, there's no way a $20,000 tv could put the projector market in BIG trouble. It's TOO little and expensive to cause even a blip in the projector market.

@@TheMeefive _"I bought a brand new Bbianlyy native 4k projector for $189"_ lol... comparing a Fiat 500 with a Bugatti

@budala1969 Maybe you missed the point. 2020 I bought a 1080p for $238. The cheapest 1080p was $189. Now you can get native 1080p for $69. The Bbianlyy may not be the greatest native 4k projector but it's the first native 4k for under $200. It's just a matter of time before other native 4k projectors start selling for $100 or less. Now you laugh at the comparison but as I pointed out, the average consumer doesn't buy Bugatti.

yeah if money is not an object then sure but 🤦‍♂

Indeed.

@@logirexEven if I was super wealthy, that's a goofy amount of money to pay for a television.

But TCL has had 98 inch TV’s on sale as low as $2000 that still look better than projectors that cost more. Vincent did a video on this a while ago. Projectors may not be “in trouble” but they will have to significantly lower prices if they want to compete with TV’s.

It's way cheaper in China, it's under $10k if you buy in China

Yeah because those things are so difficult my next tv after 83” could be 65” Also selling them or even giving them to someone is difficult. No one could take my 77” OLED even for free, because it’s simply not physically possible to move there, so it’s been with me unused for years.

About the 98 inch TCL in November 1923. The movers had no problem, dropping it off in my upstairs living room. And then a week later me and My Cousin pulled it out of the box and put it together quite easily. And I’m 53 years old and in extremely poor health.

You can buy it in China for $10k (80k yuan)

@@Albrts oh good! So hopefully in the coming years we will see price drops

@JayDpwnz: Yes, should the opportunity arise.

8.5 more than I need. 😢

I can get a nap halfway through that epic marathon.

1:44 Well UST projectors don't do 5K nits in any room.

@cgott42: Literally night and day.

With lots of LCD blur if you watch carefully so projectors have nothing to worry about yet plus they also have the advantage of 3D on some models

@@JULESSNOOKER 🤡 so what? This is still a very good high end VA LCD. "Blur" can happen everywhere, and it doesn't invalidate the screen in question! 👍

@@Valdaemonium OK

​@@ValdaemoniumThis isn't a high-end TV. It's not even OLED. The screen size is the main reason this TV is getting attention.

@@PSYCHOV3N0M 🤡 So what?🤔 I just told "glorious" to the size, and even this panel is not the same which is used on sony bravia 9, EVEN SO IT'S STILL GOOD ENOUGH 👍 About OLED: this video IS ABOUT AN LCD TV*** Just in videos with OLED panel I'd say glorious OLED! 🤨👀🤦

And the Honor Magic 6 Ultimate and the 2024 iPad Pro. Both of those devices use Tandem OLED panels.

Are you asking why He didn't use the film as a Reference? Since Wizard of Oz already got a 4K release.

@onlyvik: We have alluded to this before, but home cinema projectors can never reproduce the creative intent, because home distribution releases (4K Blu-rays, streaming, etc.) are graded on direct-view reference monitors, different from theatrical distribution for commercial cinemas.

@@hdtvtest Hi Vincent. My point is not about the video quality, todays tv's are way better than projectors I know that.

Around 10ft is how far I sit from my projector screen that's 120".

10 inches for immersion

Was that backhanded compliment really necessary? His English has always been excellent, even in his oldest videos.

@RandomUnassignedYTHandle: We have alluded to this before, but home cinema projectors can never reproduce the creative intent, because home distribution releases (4K Blu-rays, streaming, etc.) are graded on direct-view reference monitors, different from theatrical distribution for commercial cinemas.

Thank you for your reply. Long time fan of you and your channel! Well, I see what you're saying. I do hope home projection continues to progress though. As I do enjoy the reflected light experience. On my screen or even expanded to the entire wall, I just love this thing. And of course for those of us in a smaller place, but who still want a big screen, it helps make this accessible.

Most people will be even be able to fit a 150 inch tv in their house. It's just most people wouldn't be able to get it up or down their stairs. It would have to go in their living room

Its only 1.5m tall. I already have a 120 inch screen in my ground floor flat. We will buy one of these when they hit 10k

a 110 inch TV in even a decently sized flat in the UK would be quite ridiculous

@@MA-jz4yc Y'all must only have short ceilings if you feel this way

I don't think the tv is designed for people living in flats.

whats wrong with tcl?

@@reinhartsieger6588shorter lifespan than the competition.. We had one a few years back..

🤔

@@reinhartsieger6588 they have a reddit and YT is removing my comment just for saying the name of that website

@@reinhartsieger6588 this is funny YT is deleting my comment

Do you know of any newer projectors that can deliver similar HDR levels and contrast?) As far as power consumption is concerned, even an ignorant person realizes that a very large TV panel will also consume the corresponding electricity. I imagine the same question about who will pay for the electricity, you will also have it for the reviews concerning powerful home cinema amplifiers and 500-1000 watt subwoofers. if you can't pay 1000kwh per year the average consumption for this television, then this (or any large) television does not fit your financial profile.

If you're worrying about electricity cost, you can't afford this TV or anything similar.

@@budala1969I can afford this tv, but on long turn, the energy cost of using of such device is to way high. Energy may dirt cheap where you live, but that ain't the case in Europe. It's like buying a Ferrari or a Porsche, you can afford to buy it, but it needs quite a lot of fuel and expensive maintenance.

@@walterverbeeck6929 High end PJs use a ton of power too. As do PCs. The current top commercial video card, RTX 4090, alone uses 450W.

​@@walterverbeeck6929Europeans don't the have rooms big enough for a 115in TV 😂 Even if you use the TV for 5 hours a day at $0.2/kWhr that's still only a dollar a day. It's not that crazy expensive.

it is yes

Well the 850g doesn’t have high local dimming available in game mode, so the 851g does but at the expensive of lag.

@@TheMailerDaemonLives Hm, so maybe this is just an LD High issue? I’m going to reach out to Rtings in hopes they’ll test all three LD settings when they do their input lag measurements. Looks like they just purchased the 24’ QM8 so they should begin working on it soon.

@EvilijoUK: 8K should make a difference at this screen size (though we wouldn't go so far as to say it's massive), but the brightness would drop due to lower light transmittance, and the higher power consumption probably wouldn't pass EU energy regulations.

What is the one 3D blu ray that you would recommend to everyone that makes the technology worth it?

@brandonchutt312 not making it easy on me picking only one haha Guess I'd have to go with valerian city of a thousand planets.. or maybe Alita, or ghost in the shell.. ready player one err jumper. Idk, maybe I have bad taste but I enjoy em

@brutalbown1: The G4 tops out at 97 inches though, whereas this TCL X955 Max is 115".

@@hdtvtest Hey Vincent, Do you have other channel? I think I saw some of your videos in other channel(HDR Test).

Now THAT would be a great comparison to this TV. I bet that Panasonic was close to 20k even back then too!

@@mickschnabel I assume you are joking, because it was way way way more than that. I think I remember it was like 500k or something crazy like that.

@@cajampa I can't recall if it was a TCL brand or what, but a few months back it was on sale for $3,000. I shit you not! It was either a 98 inch or 100 inch.... Oh unless you're talking about the Panasonic from back in the day, because yeah I have no idea how much that actually was! (I got my replies mixed up)

@@mickschnabel What....no one was talking about any TCL until you just now brought it up now. OP only talked about the massive Panasonic plasma. And you replied confused and thought it costed 20K, and I just informed you and said that no It was 500K.

@@mickschnabel I’ve seen a 98 inch TCL on sale for $1999 brand new. I think the 100 inch Hisense is the one you have seen on sale for $2999. The TCL’s retail price on that tv was $5000. That’s one hell of a discount.

just watch things with black bars i don't get it

@@ramoncastillo532 With TV's this big it means the difference between whether it will fit or not. My room can fit a 97" 16:9 TV max but I could fit a 140" 21:9 TV! Don't forget about leaving room for your speakers, especially center channel.

@@brandobond You'll probably need to wait for modular micro-LED to become affordable.

Most projectors have a Game mode just like TVs now.

@@CasepbX It's still shitty latency and overwhelming majority do not support VRR.

It's under 6 feet tall so in 2024 it count as a Short King. Quite the Mini Lad.

@pieman3141: Yes.