Please can you react to movie called CODA it’s by Emilia jonas it’s win Oscar and have a great massage

Can you do a reaction to asian horror movies? Or the ju-on TV show?

Yeah but in the first one, it’s heavily implied that there were multiple families before this one, they were the family that brought her into America, so this her “rookie” family is out of place and incorrect plot wise

@@gyrosbounty5566 the family before this one was a family from Estonia that she tricked into adopting her and then later murdered when she couldn’t seduce the father. It’s implied that she was adopted into that family the same way she was in the original movie, and didn’t fake being a missing child like in this one, so it could’ve been easy for her to blend in with that family just like the family from the original, and any other family before that, up until she got caught by trying to seduce the dad. All of these previous families were also from her home country of Estonia too so it’s possible she had more of a bond with those families or some sort of an advantage to the point where she didn’t feel the need to hide her personal belongings like her book since they would have no need to investigate her or try to dig for answers. She could’ve manipulated them to the point where she could let her guard down. However, this family was brand new territory for her since now she is pretending to be a biological child that went missing and then taken to a new country where the mother knows the truth about her daughter and quickly goes looking for answers in her belongings. On top of that, she was also being secretly investigated by the police which is something that probably didn’t happen with her previous families since she was adopted and was not a missing child. Again, all of this is brand new territory for Esther so she realistically and naturally makes plenty of mistakes as a result.

​@@yitoproductions 💯💯💯

Another thing is that this takes place in 2007 two years before the events of the original in 2009 so it only shows that she's been practicing her facade and killing so many families over that time this house fire was an accident all the others later down the lines were arson showing what the doctor said about killing the whole family and burning the house down

Yeah it's great to rewatch as the acting makes way more sense.

The acting wasn't bad to me. Once the twist happened...they got on my damn nerves rather quickly. I don't believe that either cared about the real Esther.

therapy for what

@@franp1913 she was 12 in the first movie so i assume it would hurt a childs brain having to play a killer and having to do a "seduce the dad" scene at the age of 12

​@@poopee8134definitely not in a interview with her while promoting the first film she was fine infact exited about playing the character and had a lot of fun so no.

A recast could have been more offensive for the fans of the original Orphan. Esther IS Isabelle Fuhrman. The character everybody love was made for and by her. The director himself tweeted how the production of the movie was basically on a dead point, because the studio wanted cast a new child actress to play Esther but nobody in the crew wanted to do it, and then Isabelle come and she basically motivated everyone and saved the movie. You can tell there's was true passion behind this project and the people who made it.

Agree Hats Off To Writers Felt Like They Did Their Thing With Another Twist Yet again Twist of the year to me imo

That movie forever scarred me. one of the best psychological horrors. Mike would trip

The fact I watched that and I don’t get creeped out by much but the thought of being stuck on your body and not able to move or speak always creeps me out

I love it!

Actually the detective was suspicious of the family even before "Esther" returned. That's why the mom asks "what is he doing here" when the detective arrives.

I think its the case of Frédéric Pierre Bourdin. The french man who pretended to be a missing boy and the family randomly accepted it.

@@tajtay but the part where the the mother covered up Gunnar accidentally killing Esther was the Ramsey case.

@KaeMcSpadden Did the filmmakers mention the Ramsey's? This family, too, the speculation was they went along with this because they were covering up their sons death/murder.

I mean yh thar is true but the first one was so much more in depth and had greater acting I mean sure, u can see hiw she corrected her mistakes but no one needed to know how tbf I'm not saying that this movie is bad by any means but it's not better than the original The original had a better twist, better suspense and a better set of characters but the main problem with the prequel is that u already know they're gonna die They did fix that issue slightly by making the characters unlikeable but the suspense is still taken away I would love liked a sequal where they showed the FIRST family or her origins more in depth rather than just the previous family

This second is bad no horror and the parents been the bad guys makes no sense

​@@ShadowMods221it made perfect sense They're rich assholes and that was shown through the entire movie Also, u do realise that orphan is a psychological thriller, not horror I'm not saying it's as good as the first one but the plot twist was still good

Nah there’s still something to tell and they didn’t use cgi they just shot camera movements from far away

They didn't use CGI at all. They used platform boots to make everyone taller, they used body doubles, makeup and camera angles, etc.

Ok looking up on it....they didn't use cgi at all ........sorry for assuming that. I gotta say she didn't age that much then....I mean she did but at the same time not alot.

@@Lex-fs1ru Even some minor details like fake teeths that looks identical to the ones Esther had in the first movie, and contact lens to make her eyes more bulging and child like.