Elwyn R t

Russian SU fu..ng all

it's Independence Day, not "tha forth".

Thanks!

how much cowardice does it take to commit mass murder with these???,,,,,crash and burn...crash and burn...

If you’re gonna cause most of the worlds problems, it makes sense to invest heavily into military.

Paul Fearns List the problems that we have caused. Go

Fucking hell do you all need to make it political? Just enjoy the video

@@paulfea we've mostly caused problems for ourselves

@@paulfea wow...such ignorance of the rest of the world

Heck yeah it is! I was lucky enough to see a mock dogfight between a raptor and an f15…..it was insane just how much faster and more maneuverable the raptor is. It can literally fly circles around an f15 and make it look like a Sunday cruise.

Really want to make it a stealth one ?? Make it electric ! Look at the bright side , it won't hurt anybody's ears ! Idiots and old school sheeps are still occupying decision making ranks at Pentagon and USAF , draining out the public funds like flush in the toilet ! Innovators at new tech ?? My arse !

matt prior ummm..... ok, I’m going to guess English isn’t your first language

Make an F-15 with vectored thrust.

Daniel Ruppmann uh, the f-15s mtd?

@@mattprior8442 well an electric f15 are toys trying to turn a fighter JET into an electric aircraft is dumb you would lose all performance wont even be able to break the sound barrier probably won't even be able to takeoff with the f15 combat load yea it wont hurt your ears but it would also have a shit combat radius and ferry range

$68.000 per hour to fly

Really want to make it a stealth one ?? Make it electric ! Look at the bright side , it won't hurt anybody's ears ! Idiots and old school sheeps are still occupying decision making ranks at Pentagon and USAF , draining out the public funds like flush in the toilet ! Innovators at new tech ?? My arse !

When the second plane appeared, There was a moment I thought its a freaking alien craft.

Those people in the 60s seen this plane and thought it was a UFO

matt prior How are you supposed to make an electric JET ENGINE???

Graeme Orville Wright lived until just after Chuck Yeager flew the first supersonic flight. The event was initially classified, and I don’t know if Orville was aware of it.

I bet they are thinking: Dam why didn't we think of that. Wing warping sucks.

@@ScottieG59 My grandmother saw everything from Kitty Hawk to the moon landings during her lifetime. She was 3 years old when they first flew...born 1900, died 1972. I was in first grade when they landed on the moon and I'm STILL waiting for them to go back or to Mars...Still haven't got my practical jet pack, my flying car...

@@yourhandlehere1 Don't worry, it'll happen soon, like in one or two decades. Stay well and healthy until then

@@kurumi394 So, maybe I'll get to fly to Bingo when I'm 80? Great. We just put an entire generation of the world a year behind in school over a mostly harmless cold virus. I see things going backwards....

they're making a stealth version.

+Moose Moose The Silent Eagle right?

It was conceptual, no one bought into it, the F-15SA is the most modern F-15 variant being made, and will prob be the last variant made.

I build the F-15 daily...Still IMO the baddest bird out there.

sevenrats The most sucessful modern fighter jet

+Alexander L Look up the specs. F-22 maximum speed is Mach 2.25. F-15 maximum speed is Mach 2.5+ Study the history of the F-15 Eagle if you want to learn about a truly great fighter jet. The F-22 hasn't proven anything yet. Maybe it will.

+Bruce because it's older.

+Alexander L Because it's older? What?

+Bruce you said why. why is because it's the older less maneuverable aircraft. Sorry, technology moves along

+Bruce Hes referring to the agility of the Raptor and not the speed. Mach 2.25 is what we know the raptor can reach, noone besides the USAF actually knows its stop speed?

Being presumably an American, Your suppose to say ( flown by the best of the best 😃)

+Wonkabar007 Cheers, couldnt believe my luck but my god I was fighting the wind!

+Wonkabar007 Yeah... and he had the best flyby of em all in that old F-15.

+colonelclank , Yeah , the old F-15s was much proven in aerial combat than the F-22s .

+ogie cruz TBD. On KZfaq 1 F22 took on and defeated 5 F15s. That's some serious shit. The helmet sees thru the plane. So sick.

+colonelclank , So its not totally the aircraft that did the job ? its the helmet , as you referred to .

Seriously ? After the SR-71 you are baffled by this ? It is Lockheed skunkworks after all .

@@Dr.Westside mixed with DARPA

Lots of money makes things happen

Because they pump 700billion into the army

Imagine what they’re working on now or what kinds of technology they have stuffed away feel in the vaults!

H

RockNRollaCA LA The F-15 would easily catch the F-22 as the Eagle has superior speed. That said, in a head to head fight, the Raptor wins every time. I'm not telling you anything you probably don't already know. I bet most of us out here watching these jets would love just one chance to take a ride in either plane.

Well the Pratt & Whitney F-119 engines can hit super cruise without afterburner. The F-15 Eagle would have to be in full afterburner to even keep up. If the Raptor decided to hit full throttle.. BYE BYE Eagle! Also keep in mind the top speeds of the Raptor is Classified.

The Eagle in persuit was the strike variant slugging 2×600 gal tanks too.

The Raptors looked more agile than the Eagle on that last sharp roll to starboard, but that's only my impression from one video clip!

+Privacy Matterson: Think you're right, I'm sure vectored thrust while turning was engaged.

+FlightSimulatorXATC To be fair the Eagle driver didn't do too badly himself mate :)

fanfics have ruined you

;);)

You piece of shit i need years of therapy to get rid of that image!

Wilectric lol

The X Files bwarharaa

+UK Aviation Movies That was epic! So nimble!

Your first solo in that plane is not your first solo, believe me. Lots of other jet experience and plenty of simulator time. I flew A7s and there were no 2 seaters early on. By the time you get to the advanced airplanes, you're a pretty good pilot or you wouldn't be there. It is still an interesting experience to fly a new airplane solo for the first time.

Actually, the thrust vectoring isn't used much, if at all, at fairly high subsonic speeds like this. The F-22 simply has greater control authority--it is a more nimble, agile fighter aerodynamically. Part of this is the negative static stability it has in all three axes--it "wants to" pitch, roll, and yaw all the time, and the digital flight control system keeps this under control, artificially stabilizing the aircraft. The result is that the F-22 responds more quickly (if this is commanded) than most every other fighter. Others also have "relaxed" stability or even negative stability in one or more axes, but I think currently only the F-22 is negatively stable in all three. If you look at the F-22 and watch its control surfaces closely (in other videos, as this one is not the best for this), you can see how this works on the F-22. Its forward fuselage is curved to provide a substantial amount of lift in level flight, which moves its center of lift forward of its center of mass, which means that the tail must generate lift to keep everything level and balanced, as opposed to a downward force like on a statically stable aircraft. When you want to pitch up to turn, the tail momentarily imparts a downward force (or generates less lift) that causes the F-22 to pitch upward very quickly, and then keeps the upward pitch under control by generating lift again. The result is a quicker, harder turn than most other fighters can make under the same conditions. It also helps that the F-22's control surfaces are so large, often assisted by vortices, and move so quickly (strong hydraulics). Thrust vectoring really only comes into play at slow speeds or supersonic speeds, when the aerodynamic controls lose much of their authority.

Don't forget the little fighting Falcon...still bad ass

+Ciderboy4646 Laughing man!

Maxine Drapo - I was totally there! Then they featured it with an F-15 and a P-51 mustang in a Heritage Tribute Flight. When each one passed over the Walmart parking lot super low and at speed, I thought I was gonna pass out with excitement. I mean, I could see the pilots! The rumble of all three planes set off car alarms.

Really want to make it a stealth one ?? Make it electric ! Look at the bright side , it won't hurt anybody's ears ! Idiots and old school sheeps are still occupying decision making ranks at Pentagon and USAF , draining out the public funds like flush in the toilet ! Innovators at new tech ?? My arse !

Had the same thing happen in the early 2000's on I-70 just west of Kansas City, MO...a B2 stealth bomber flew right over the truck I was driving and went into a hard banked turn. Couldn't have been more than a 1000 feet off the ground.

+airshowvision Cheers it wasnt my best filming! but couldnt believe what was in front of me!!

. . . he really flicks it in hard as well. You will do well with this clip!

The F-22 was an American pilot and the F-15 was undoubtedly wasn't so he would obviously had flown the loop dozens of times. Don't know about you but I wouldn't want to be the man that downs an F-22 because you wanted to be cocky in terrain you are not accustomed to.

+MerksX209A Dude, what are you talking about? The tail markings have "LN" clearly visible, which indicates that this F-15 C/D/E belongs to the 48th Fighter Wing stationed at RAF Lakenheath.

Because RAF and USAF pilots cross over in each other air forces. normally for a year at a time

Best plane ever... f15 will never dies!

Hell to the Yes!

It still is.

Prove this man wrong I dare you

The Eagle made changes to the world. Both geo-politically and technologically. Sick and tired of these freaks that show up and act that they are the doers of anything. One begets the other. Like listening to Peter Griffen bitch about people using horse-drawn carriages instead of cars. There is a linear development that happens...and YES, it takes generations, but to come out and say "hey, the b-1 toasts the b-17". I will say that the F-15...dollar per dollar still drops the raptor.

I don't know, Russians make good weapons too

+Eric Torres or unit cost

+elscientist haha

+Eric Torres Are you kidding! That is the whole issue! The F-22 Raptor has been out performed by every fighter in NATO! The entire "joint strike fighter" concept has turned out to be a giant, expensive mistake! The largest military contract in history! Experts agree, they'll build 100 and this program will quietly end.

+I Flick A bit of advice: 1/ Learn the difference between the F-22 Raptor and the F-35 Lightning II. Only the latter aircraft is called the joint strike fighter while the aircraft featured in the video is the F-22. 2/ Learn what the F-35 is capable of before criticizing it.

+Norwegian733 ditto

NorwegianOne . Helluva turn rate.

@@ottopilot7205 Yeah, an esthetic turn.

+Sgt.Fury why? I don't see what makes it better than something made 50 years ago.

+Roman Fox thats like sking what makes a new computer better than a old one.The technology is better.

seAnceTM because it just is? People talk about how great it is, and I don't see what makes it so great. You could talk about computers and say that a computer that filled a room now fits in a watch 20 years later and talk about touch screens/blue tooth/etc. But you're just saying, "JUST BECAUSE IT IS!"

+Roman Fox A laptop today can do a shit ton more than a computer the size of a house 40 years ago. An F22 can fly faster, further, maneuver better, carry more armament, and can avoid radar detection unlike a plane 50 years ago.

Britman I guess that's all true, but what I'm saying is that the flying looks unimpressive, even if it's upgraded in a lot of ways.

nathan mccreery lol best comment I have ever seen on a KZfaq video.

The only F-16's that fight against US fighters like F-22's and F-35's that are always on the good guys Blue force side of Red Flag, while the Red force flys fighters like the F-16C and F-15C are the Red force fighters made up to look and perform as closely to Migs that is possible. All the Red force fighters are camo'd in crazy blues and browns, light blues and yellows like Russian fighters are, while the US pilots that make up the Red force pilots fly exact Russian tactics 100% of the time and even learn to speak Russian to make cross talk chatter sound real.. The US has a few dozen of each Mig 21's, Mig 23's, Mig 27's and Mig 29's. The US also has 6 of Sadams Mig 25's and two new Mig 31's used by Iraq but never saw the air while US F-15's were flying. The US also owns many Sukhoi fighters like 6 SU 27's, 4 SU 25's and many SU 20's and SU 22's, SU 15's and SU 24's. With all these Russian aircraft I could not figure out why we didnt refurbish them with our engines and systems and use them as Red force fighters? I work for Pratt & Whitney here in Southern California at Edwards AFB. Most of us engineers wanted to know why we are not using US engines and systems to use in these aircraft as Red force fighters and attack aircraft. We were told by the DOD, with all the new aircraft, ships and ground vehicles being built and going into US service there are no funds to do it at this time. The DOD did tell us they at one time were going to bring in 12 Mig 29's with more powerful, none smoking GE enhanced F414 engines with 26,400lbs of Z5 after burner thrust that each have 4200lbs of thrust more than the Russian engines in the Mig 29's that smoke so bad, you can see them from 25 miles away. Lets see, so if your friend is a part of Red Flag at Nellis or up in Alaska, than he fought the Raptor as a Red force pilot using Russian tactics in an F-16C. Correct?

P&Wengineering Iraq never had Mig 31 as Russia never exported it. USA doesn’t have Iraqi MIG 31’s as the only place. I doubt you do more than sweep the floor at P&W.

?

i don't want to see comments like this no mo

and a waste of money

+Wi11Brooks How is replacing three other obsolete fighter planes with a superior platform a "waste of money"?

+Allenrw3 Simply because it's behind schedule, over budget, and plagued with technical problems.

MADGUNS FOREVER™ It'll get there. A fighter jet with these kinds of capabilities has never been seen before, so of course there will be problems.

***** Salient point, I'll accept that.

cameraman655. Yes, it is. It’s a National Park.

Really want to make it a stealth one ?? Make it electric ! Look at the bright side , it won't hurt anybody's ears ! Idiots and old school sheeps are still occupying decision making ranks at Pentagon and USAF , draining out the public funds like flush in the toilet ! Innovators at new tech ?? My arse !

@@mattprior8442 1: Spent a minute or two to learn how thrust is produced. 2: A generator producing the same amount of thrust weighs many times more that a gas turbine engine, even including fuel. 3: If any pilot wants to kill you without you hearing him/her, they can by using high speed, low altitude, range, tactics, wind, ie the purpose of training and evolving tactics. 4: A gas turbine is the most controllable, efficient, realistic and effective way of producing thrust in a aircraft/helicopter, especially a military one. 5: Stealth, as in invisible, does not exist, the correct technical term is "LO", Low Observable. I can give your some quotes and ISBN numbers if you want it from testpilots, governments and those who shot them down.

Actually the US only has 250 F-15C's (those are the air superiority versions) and around 250 F-15E strike eagles. The US has over 900 F-16's still in service. But it is EXTREMELY unlikely the US will ever produce another F-22 because of the cost of restarting the production line. I believe the US is planning on a total of around 2,700 F-35's. While the US only has around 190 F-22's, that is still more fighters than countries like the UK and Germany have in their air force. The UK only has something like 174 Typhoons.

+MississippiRebel He said that 2 years ago..............................................

Sdjmfan12 ..I have not heard this?....how or where did you here this?

Ok dumbass you’re debating a subjective opinion with another subjective opinion. (As if the content of your comment didn’t make you look dumb enough already)

+Daniel May yeah, The Mach loop

Yes it's Britain its north wales not far from snowdonia the amount of aircrafts that go through there are unreal