Q❤

Gala kaato bum fodo university😂

Harr chiz mai ek hi baat nikalti hai..."daro..india tumhe kha jayega"😂😂

He is our favourite, His Highness, PDF File, Four-Feet Modmod (SAW- Saudi Arab Wale).. #Om_Hu_Akbar 🚩

That's OK. We All Know Pakistani Intellectuals Prefer To Show India In Negative Lights To Prove Their "2 Nation Theory". So, Let's Ignore Those.

Correct

I can understand India closing some canals but main flow of the river cannot be stopped else there would have been floods in Indian side.

​@@sarvesh704 Dr. Hasan don't know that river belongs to Jammu and Kashmir as Sui gass belongs to Balochistan and furtile land belongs to Indo Pak Punjab so the beneficiaries must be natives of that land where the resources belong. If Pakistan gov sell sui gass or Indian gov sell Coal of Bastar to china then china would have to pay money or services to that country or state. So water is not just the freebies things but a precious natural resource like Sui gass. You can't say that we have been beneficiaries for years by indus naturally so we don't need any treaty. Similarly , it is also applied on depence of Kashmiris and Indians to Punjabi resources and trade routes to central Asia for Indians people. Mr. Hasan is claiming water of Ganga and Yamuna , the question is did he ever read Independence act 1947. It's the partition of British India land not natural resource. Afterthat the muslims denied to go Pakistan even many league leaders didn't go there and Pakistan closed the doors for them. So Indian muslims can claim thier demanded motherland Pakistan because Pakistan violated the Indian independence act 1947 and it can fuel hindu Rashtra movement in India.19% muslim of British India got 30% land afterthat they made islamic nation and denied to leave India. And the second things that any agreement between any country are valid until their parliament or senate don't pass any legislation against treaty. For example , USA cancelled nuclear treaty with Iran unilaterally during Trump era. So We have given our 90% water to Pakistan So Indian parliament has also right to refute any treaty via parliament as Pakistan violated in East and West Pakistan of Nehru Liaqat pact. The third things is flow of wastage of Indian side to Pakistan. So it's obvious things. Because of slope towards Pakistani Punjab. We can disscus and give repression to Pakistani gov. Similarily , Pakistani gov should also pay for Crops Residue burning because because the western wind push it towards Indian Punjab and Delhi states. So first of all We should sit together and talk with mutual respect on indus water treaty honestly in all perspective including climate change and your wastage issues too because glaciers are melting very fast. So I agree that India water treaty is a fraud treaty , Indian gov should reject it as far as possible. The kashmiri people should be paid money by lower riparian India and Pakistan on the basis of consumption of water on the individual basis. The main flow can also be diverted to make more dams on eastern side of rivers and it would not have been any chance of flood .We can do same things on indus as China have been doing on brahmaputra.

@@sarvesh704 Main flow was never stopped, because, India did not have the mechanism to stop the main flow. For that you need dams and reservoirs, which were not yet built at that time.

Hence the name black hole

Dr. Hasan don't know that river belongs to Jammu and Kashmir as Sui gass belongs to Balochistan and furtile land belongs to Indo Pak Punjab so the beneficiaries must be natives of that land where the resources belong. If Pakistan gov sell sui gass or Indian gov sell Coal of Bastar to china then china would have to pay money or services to that country or state. So water is not just the freebies things but a precious natural resource like Sui gass. You can't say that we have been beneficiaries for years by indus naturally so we don't need any treaty. Similarly , it is also applied on depence of Kashmiris and Indians to Punjabi resources and trade routes to central Asia for Indians people. Mr. Hasan is claiming water of Ganga and Yamuna , the question is did he ever read Independence act 1947. It's the partition of British India land not natural resource. Afterthat the muslims denied to go Pakistan even many league leaders didn't go there and Pakistan closed the doors for them. So Indian muslims can claim thier demanded motherland Pakistan because Pakistan violated the Indian independence act 1947 and it can fuel hindu Rashtra movement in India.19% muslim of British India got 30% land afterthat they made islamic nation and denied to leave India. And the second things that any agreement between any country are valid until their parliament or senate don't pass any legislation against treaty. For example , USA cancelled nuclear treaty with Iran unilaterally during Trump era. So We have given our 90% water to Pakistan So Indian parliament has also right to refute any treaty via parliament as Pakistan violated in East and West Pakistan of Nehru Liaqat pact. The third things is flow of wastage of Indian side to Pakistan. So it's obvious things. Because of slope towards Pakistani Punjab. We can disscus and give repression to Pakistani gov. Similarily , Pakistani gov should also pay for Crops Residue burning because because the western wind push it towards Indian Punjab and Delhi states. So first of all We should sit together and talk with mutual respect on indus water treaty honestly in all perspective including climate change and your wastage issues too because glaciers are melting very fast. So I agree that India water treaty is a fraud treaty , Indian gov should reject it as far as possible. The kashmiri people should be paid money by lower riparian India and Pakistan on the basis of consumption of water on the individual basis. The main flow can also be diverted to make more dams on eastern side of rivers and it would not have been any chance of flood .We can do same things on indus as China have been doing on brahmaputra.

@@HimanshuShukla0802 Rivers don't belong to political boundaries - from source to delta a river is complex and connected ecological integrity. It only belongs to the landscape where it flows. Both countries, and their people, must understand this philosophy of respecting and managing a river. Both countries must shun outdated political and governance models of the past and embrace modern concepts of sustainability and cooperation. And most important, it is time to think above prejudice for a better future of coming generations in both countries.

​@@2537Hassan what follow the rules and regulations when one side wages four wars again and again .. I don't think so .

@@2537Hassan We Indians will tell what belongs to whom. Now we are the most populated nation on earth. Hum Rules Banaayenge ab.

Dr. Hasan don't know that river belongs to Jammu and Kashmir as Sui gass of Balochistan so the first beneficiaries must be natives of that land where the resources belongs. If Pakistan gov sell sui gass to china then china would have to pay money or services to that country. water is not just the freebies but a precious natural resource like Sui gass. Mr. Hasan is claiming water of Ganga and Yamuna , the question is did he ever read Independence act 1947. It's the partition of British India land not natural resource. Afterthat the muslims denied to go Pakistan even many league leaders didn't go there and Pakistan closed the doors for them. So Indian muslims can claim thier demanded motherland Pakistan because Pakistan violated the Indian independence act 1947 and it can fuel other hindu Rashtra movement in India.19% muslim of British India got 30% land afterthat they made islamic nation and denied to leave India. And the second things that any agreement between any country are valid until their parliament or senate don't pass any legislation against treaty. For example , USA cancelled nuclear treaty with Iran unilaterally during Trump era. So We have given our 80% water to Pakistan So Indian parliament has also right to refute any treaty via parliament as Pakistan violated in East and West Pakistan of Nehru Liaqat pact.

Rivers don't belong to political boundaries - from source to delta a river is complex and connected ecological integrity. It only belongs to the landscape where it flows. Both countries, and their people, must understand this philosophy of respecting and managing a river. Both countries must shun outdated political and governance models of the past and embrace modern concepts of sustainability and cooperation. And most important, it is time to think above prejudice for a better future of coming generations in both countries.

@@2537Hassaniit cant coperate with madrassa there is no obama osama patnership.

@@2537Hassan Yes Rivers dont belong to political boundaries but the agreement to share the resources of river should be fair and equal, it should not cheat people from one side whether it is lower or upper riparian state. Also Quite nice of you to say all these big words of embracing modernity and sustainibility etc when its your country who is getting a better deal out of the treaty. Say that to people of Northern Indian states who with a similar population and area got only 18% water from the whole Indus River system, say that to the farmers deprived from river water which only originates from their land, say that to people of Rural Rajasthan who never got a water canal they deserved, say that to people of Haryana and Punjab fighting over SYL. It is better that Pakistan understands why ammendent in the treaty is required, the problem is taking centre stage in India and sooner or later India will be forced to act on its own.

@@a141tho2 Please suggest something in the light of currently prevailing international norms as I mentioned earlier. Nothing short of that will work for the future of Indus Basin.

Ye 1990s me ji rhe hey , jaise fake history inhone print ki thi , abhi bhi vhi kr rhe hey.

Not right now, learn from China(salami slicing strategy, keep taking resources little by little without starting a conflict). Pakistan is struggling rn, India should just keeping building small infrastructure silently, start utilising top 3 river waters. Pakistan won't start a conflict in their current condition for 1-2 small infra. Keep building it, when Pak becomes strong or have other countries support, just sign a deal, pay em some money n it's over. In future they can't ask India to destroy those Infra, India can play victim "1.5 billion people, no water to drink, harvest,....).

@@mr.miller2592 Rivers don't belong to political boundaries - from source to delta a river is complex and connected ecological integrity. It only belongs to the landscape where it flows. Both countries, and their people, must understand this philosophy of respecting and managing a river. Both countries must shun outdated political and governance models of the past and embrace modern concepts of sustainability and cooperation. And most important, it is time to think above prejudice for a better future of coming generations in both countries.

How come a small country get 3 rivers exclusively. Time to renegotiate treaty. Pakistan deserved only 1 river

@@anishsingh7284 As the treaty was negotiated, it was between 1 unit of India (east Punjab) and one unit of Pakistan (west Pakistan). This is the official language of the Treaty. West Pakistan was 10 times bigger than East Punjab.

Besides this, the notion of 'who gets which river' is wrong in the first place. Water belongs to the rivers and not the political jurisdictions. Ecological integrity of the rivers should have been maintained and should be restored for future cooperation between the two countries.

If you know everything why are you watching a Pakistani YT channel? Coz your country is extremist and would arrest anyone if such program is arranged in an open manner.

Sir if u r a civil engineer,, its a different area of study,,

​@@saeeddeen7304really?? Then who builds the DAM Politicians?? IT professionals??

This is the most absurd stat used with respect to IWT. It measures Indus at Attock with 93MAF of flow. Out this 93, not less than 20 originates from India, rest it originates from glaciers in Pakistan, Hidu Kush Mountains and Afghanistan. By no means India can draw that water and even the small percentage of Indus in its headwaters in IOK, it is next to impossible to draw that water towards Indian Punjab given the difficult mountain ranges in between. So the 93 MAF which neither passes though India nor can be withdrawn by India is condescendingly added to the total water to make India's %look small. Else it can be said that Pakistan, out of great generosity, gave complete Ganga and Yamna to India. Lets be real and understand rivers and geography their geography - above politics and prejudice.

​@@2537Hassan bebkuf lag rha hai mujhe tu....... Kuch to soch samaj ke bol... Pakistan population only 22 crore nd india 140...total river 6...3 river all india.... After 3 mai se only 20% india ko... Ye kha se justify hai... Nd india water root change krne ki bat kar ni rha.. Hai kashmir mai 2 dam bnane hai... Jo Pakistan ki bjh se roke hai... Us water se bijli generate krni hai... Hydro power....... Jisse loca kashmiri ko he benifit hoga....... So itni si bat samaj ni aati pakistaniyo ka.... Water ko..... Punjab side divide kiya nii ja skta but... Equally divide to ho.... Or jha tak ho skte... Usse local public ko benifit diya jaye

Don't play victim india knows they will never be able to take that water that's why they did that in treaty we gave u permission to make dams and we will take ur dump and gave u permission to play with nature and gave u some more water

Dr. Hasan don't know that river belongs to Jammu and Kashmir as Sui gass of Balochistan so the first beneficiaries must be natives of that land where the resources belongs. If Pakistan gov sell sui gass to china then china would have to pay money or services to that country. water is not just the freebies but a precious natural resource like Sui gass. Mr. Hasan is claiming water of Ganga and Yamuna , the question is did he ever read Independence act 1947. It's the partition of British India land not natural resource. Afterthat the muslims denied to go Pakistan even many league leaders didn't go there and Pakistan closed the doors for them. So Indian muslims can claim thier demanded motherland Pakistan because Pakistan violated the Indian independence act 1947 and it can fuel other hindu Rashtra movement in India.19% muslim of British India got 30% land afterthat they made islamic nation and denied to leave India. And the second things that any agreement between any country are valid until their parliament or senate don't pass any legislation against treaty. For example , USA cancelled nuclear treaty with Iran unilaterally during Trump era. So We have given our 80% water to Pakistan So Indian parliament has also right to refute any treaty via parliament as Pakistan violated in East and West Pakistan of Nehru Liaqat pact.

@@HimanshuShukla0802 Thanks for the detailed explanation

@@HimanshuShukla0802 Rivers don't belong to political boundaries - from source to delta a river is complex and connected ecological integrity. It only belongs to the landscape where it flows. Both countries, and their people, must understand this philosophy of respecting and managing a river. Both countries must shun outdated political and governance models of the past and embrace modern concepts of sustainability and cooperation. And most important, it is time to think above prejudice for a better future of coming generations in both countries.

​@@2537HassanFCK Pakistan......We do not want anything with a beggar and terrorist nation !

Jis Gyan ko, Google baba pe search karne se Propoganda Unlimited bold latter mh likhhke aa jate hai... Kashmir plebiscite treaty nd indus water treaty

_Hum To Mazloom Hain. Hamare Khilaaf Puri Duniya Shaazis Krti Hai_ Attitude.😂 If 50+ years old intellectual has this attitude, It means propaganda that pak establishment did initially has become part of their gene.

​@@KararaJawaab Raa ki shaazis😂😂

Nope. Dr. Hasan don't know that river belongs to Jammu and Kashmir as Sui gass of Balochistan so the beneficiaries must be natives of that land where the resources belongs. If Pakistan gov sell sui gass to china then china would have to pay money or services to that country. water is not just the freebies but a precious natural resource like Sui gass. Mr. Hasan is claiming water of Ganga and Yamuna , the question is did he ever read Independence act 1947. It's the partition of British India land not natural resource. Afterthat the muslims denied to go Pakistan even many league leaders didn't go there and Pakistan closed the doors for them. So Indian muslims can claim thier demanded motherland Pakistan because Pakistan violated the Indian independence act 1947 and it can fuel other hindu Rashtra movement in India.19% muslim of British India got 30% land afterthat they made islamic nation and denied to leave India. And the second things that any agreement between any country are valid until their parliament or senate don't pass any legislation against treaty. For example , USA cancelled nuclear treaty with Iran unilaterally during Trump era. So We have given our 80% water to Pakistan So Indian parliament has also right to refute any treaty via parliament as Pakistan violated in East and West Pakistan of Nehru Liaqat pact.

@@HimanshuShukla0802 Rivers don't belong to political boundaries - from source to delta a river is complex and connected ecological integrity. It only belongs to the landscape where it flows. Both countries, and their people, must understand this philosophy of respecting and managing a river. Both countries must shun outdated political and governance models of the past and embrace modern concepts of sustainability and cooperation. And most important, it is time to think above prejudice for a better future of coming generations in both countries.

Best will be if India pays a Pakistani F 16 Pilot $5 Million to attack our own Dam so that we can abrogate this treaty. And we can hep him land his F-16 in India and we'll protect him and say that he's passed away.

Nope. Dr. Hasan don't know that river belongs to Jammu and Kashmir as Sui gass of Balochistan so the beneficiaries must be natives of that land where the resources belongs. If Pakistan gov sell sui gass to china then china would have to pay money or services to that country. water is not just the freebies but a precious natural resource like Sui gass. Mr. Hasan is claiming water of Ganga and Yamuna , the question is did he ever read Independence act 1947. It's the partition of British India land not natural resource. Afterthat the muslims denied to go Pakistan even many league leaders didn't go there and Pakistan closed the doors for them. So Indian muslims can claim thier demanded motherland Pakistan because Pakistan violated the Indian independence act 1947 and it can fuel other hindu Rashtra movement in India.19% muslim of British India got 30% land afterthat they made islamic nation and denied to leave India. And the second things that any agreement between any country are valid until their parliament or senate don't pass any legislation against treaty. For example , USA cancelled nuclear treaty with Iran unilaterally during Trump era. So We have given our 80% water to Pakistan So Indian parliament has also right to refute any treaty via parliament as Pakistan violated in East and West Pakistan of Nehru Liaqat pact.

@@HimanshuShukla0802 Rivers don't belong to political boundaries - from source to delta a river is complex and connected ecological integrity. It only belongs to the landscape where it flows. Both countries, and their people, must understand this philosophy of respecting and managing a river. Both countries must shun outdated political and governance models of the past and embrace modern concepts of sustainability and cooperation. And most important, it is time to think above prejudice for a better future of coming generations in both countries.

​@@2537Hassan He is a dumb Dinduu who don't understand all those 'faaarin' terms. He believes in all kinds of lies which they learn from their religious terror schools run by Dinduu militias. He doesn't know that his country was never in existence before British made a hotch potch mini empire in the South Asia.

@@2537Hassan We don't care about War Now. Ladhna Hai Toh Ladhlenge Aur 4 Country Mein Paksitan Ko Divide KArdenge Iss Baari. India will take at least 50 % share of the waters, nothing less than that. Anyway Paksitan wastes so much water because of mismanagement.

payment denied

I think Pakistan will also agree to divide water according to river Basin Population and Irrigable land on that Basin and divide the water on the regional Basis not on National basis.

​@@anythings3946 Dr. Hasan don't know that river belongs to Jammu and Kashmir as Sui gass of Balochistan so the first beneficiaries must be natives of that land where the resources belongs. If Pakistan gov sell sui gass to china then china would have to pay money or services to that country. water is not just the freebies but a precious natural resource like Sui gass. Mr. Hasan is claiming water of Ganga and Yamuna , the question is did he ever read Independence act 1947. It's the partition of British India land not natural resource. Afterthat the muslims denied to go Pakistan even many league leaders didn't go there and Pakistan closed the doors for them. So Indian muslims can claim thier demanded motherland Pakistan because Pakistan violated the Indian independence act 1947 and it can fuel other hindu Rashtra movement in India.19% muslim of British India got 30% land afterthat they made islamic nation and denied to leave India. And the second things that any agreement between any country are valid until their parliament or senate don't pass any legislation against treaty. For example , USA cancelled nuclear treaty with Iran unilaterally during Trump era. So We have given our 80% water to Pakistan So Indian parliament has also right to refute any treaty via parliament as Pakistan violated in East and West Pakistan of Nehru Liaqat pact.

​@@anythings3946 Jis bare mai tumhe ya kisi Pakistani ko knowledge na ho... Uske bare mai bat he ku krte ho.... Fir bolna be wrong hai......

Dr. Hasan don't know that river belongs to Jammu and Kashmir as Sui gass of Balochistan so the first beneficiaries must be natives of that land where the resources belongs. If Pakistan gov sell sui gass to china then china would have to pay money or services to that country. water is not just the freebies but a precious natural resource like Sui gass. Mr. Hasan is claiming water of Ganga and Yamuna , the question is did he ever read Independence act 1947. It's the partition of British India land not natural resource. Afterthat the muslims denied to go Pakistan even many league leaders didn't go there and Pakistan closed the doors for them. So Indian muslims can claim thier demanded motherland Pakistan because Pakistan violated the Indian independence act 1947 and it can fuel other hindu Rashtra movement in India.19% muslim of British India got 30% land afterthat they made islamic nation and denied to leave India. And the second things that any agreement between any country are valid until their parliament or senate don't pass any legislation against treaty. For example , USA cancelled nuclear treaty with Iran unilaterally during Trump era. So We have given our 80% water to Pakistan So Indian parliament has also right to refute any treaty via parliament as Pakistan violated in East and West Pakistan of Nehru Liaqat pact.

Accha Porkistani

Well bhai if you are indian There are many misinfo in this video so please cross check after consuming any Pak media

Paani dariya mein behne de. 😂😂.. Fools dont know how to use water efficiently says like this. Issiliye to aaplogo ka paani samunder mein jate hein.

Dr. Hasan don't know that river belongs to Jammu and Kashmir as Sui gass of Balochistan so the first beneficiaries must be natives of that land where the resources belongs. If Pakistan gov sell sui gass to china then china would have to pay money or services to that country. water is not just the freebies but a precious natural resource like Sui gass. Mr. Hasan is claiming water of Ganga and Yamuna , the question is did he ever read Independence act 1947. It's the partition of British India land not natural resource. Afterthat the muslims denied to go Pakistan even many league leaders didn't go there and Pakistan closed the doors for them. So Indian muslims can claim thier demanded motherland Pakistan because Pakistan violated the Indian independence act 1947 and it can fuel other hindu Rashtra movement in India.19% muslim of British India got 30% land afterthat they made islamic nation and denied to leave India. And the second things that any agreement between any country are valid until their parliament or senate don't pass any legislation against treaty. For example , USA cancelled nuclear treaty with Iran unilaterally during Trump era. So We have given our 80% water to Pakistan So Indian parliament has also right to refute any treaty via parliament as Pakistan violated in East and West Pakistan of Nehru Liaqat pact.

@@HimanshuShukla0802 Rivers don't belong to political boundaries - from source to delta a river is complex and connected ecological integrity. It only belongs to the landscape where it flows. Both countries, and their people, must understand this philosophy of respecting and managing a river. Both countries must shun outdated political and governance models of the past and embrace modern concepts of sustainability and cooperation. And most important, it is time to think above prejudice for a better future of coming generations in both countries.

Dr. Hasan don't know that river belongs to Jammu and Kashmir as Sui gass of Balochistan so the first beneficiaries must be natives of that land where the resources belongs. If Pakistan gov sell sui gass to china then china would have to pay money or services to that country. water is not just the freebies but a precious natural resource like Sui gass. Mr. Hasan is claiming water of Ganga and Yamuna , the question is did he ever read Independence act 1947. It's the partition of British India land not natural resource. Afterthat the muslims denied to go Pakistan even many league leaders didn't go there and Pakistan closed the doors for them. So Indian muslims can claim thier demanded motherland Pakistan because Pakistan violated the Indian independence act 1947 and it can fuel other hindu Rashtra movement in India.19% muslim of British India got 30% land afterthat they made islamic nation and denied to leave India. And the second things that any agreement between any country are valid until their parliament or senate don't pass any legislation against treaty. For example , USA cancelled nuclear treaty with Iran unilaterally during Trump era. So We have given our 80% water to Pakistan So Indian parliament has also right to refute any treaty via parliament as Pakistan violated in East and West Pakistan of Nehru Liaqat pact.

@@HimanshuShukla0802 Rivers don't belong to political boundaries - from source to delta a river is complex and connected ecological integrity. It only belongs to the landscape where it flows. Both countries, and their people, must understand this philosophy of respecting and managing a river. Both countries must shun outdated political and governance models of the past and embrace modern concepts of sustainability and cooperation. And most important, it is time to think above prejudice for a better future of coming generations in both countries.

Seriously 😒!

Noone can enlighten any Pakistani

Disappoint Ho Jaoge.😂

There was no Gandhara civilization. It's a culture in the current Punjab region. There was no ancient universities there too.

@@hawkingdawking4572 Fir Agya Tu. Sudhrega Nhi. Sab Kuch Tod Kr Bolte Ho Ki Kuch Nhi Tha Waha. Sare Non-Muslims Ko Maar Kr 100 Saal Bolna Ki Koi Dusra Mazheb Tha Hi Nhi Duniya Me.

@@hawkingdawking4572 takshshila ( Taxila ) university Ka naam suna he kya sir. Chinese pilgrims like Faxian ,Xuanzang,Yijing ancient India aae the university me padhne ke liya or inone hi budhisim spread Kiya china me

@@satyajeetbajwa It was a Budhist school of learning and not a university. The first university was established in Bologna, current Italy.