Same place, but 5 years earlier at the end of Mr Blechacz's performance, the applause was greater... it never happened before.

Where was that part?

@@loopymomy2532 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/lbClh859tp7VpWQ.html

Marek Ciepluch that video was blocked in my country! I can’t watch it 😵

@@loopymomy2532 What a pitty. In my opinion this is the best performance there is of this concerto. And the final applause was well deserved.

David Streeter the third movement it’s the key to win

yet still he lost which literally makes no sense

Avdeeva won because she had best points from whole stages, sad but true. And ofc Argerich wanted her to win :)

@@devirezxz Argerich wanted avdeeva to win? I thought I heard she didn't want avdeeva to win. Idk but someone said she wanted either wunder or trifonov to win.

Absolutely amazing and I love him, I think his should have won this competition 👍👌👏😍

Agree with you

je pense la même chose!

He came second. That’s because he didn’t come first. Go and find middle C on the keyboard you dumb ass.

@@MultiRedskins12 what? Why are you so pressedT?

Daniel Peranginangin Why can’t you spell?

@@MultiRedskins12 lol you're stupid

MultiRedskins12 Why are you a bitch?

They did the same thing for Rafal Blechacz in 2005.

assindiastignani both deserved it

@@assindiastignani Zimerman too

That depends on the audience!

Thank you!

Did you hear the whole competition performance of the winner?

@@leonardodelyrarodrigues3752你好可憐

@@user-iz1xw2tp2b I don't think so, because when I watch Yulianna's videos, in the comments people approve of her winning and say they don't understand why people say she didn't deserve it,now I go to Ingolf Wunder's videos, people say that he would have won and not Yulianna, everyone says something, it seems that nobody saw the performances, but I also sometimes had doubts, but I had already heard everything, I heard all the stages of the finalists, I think Yulianna avdeeva won the third stage with an extremely difficult programming and an unparalleled sonata, I believe that her winning also has to do with her captivating sound on the Yamaha, even tiring the ears a little due to the left hand and bass power, and Ingolf Wunder killed it in the final, in addition to having played the best polonaise, an absurd technique, Both were incredible interpreters and authentic, but if the person still has doubts about something, he probably didn't watch everything like me to draw conclusions.

Exactly. Because Chopin demands virtuosic technique but also a very intimate interpretation. My view is that Ingolf Wunder won, the judges refused to recognize that to suit an agenda that has nothing to do with music.. And certainly he has had a distinguished career since. His playing is revelatory.

@@4Topwood And what agenda ? This is a competition with several rounds, it's about whole Chopin, not just a concerto...

@@Luxsword29 An "inclusive" political agenda. This is my last reply to you. As you say, it's about Chopin--or should be. Too bad this time it wasn't.

@@4Topwood Adveeda got better marks at every round of the competition. Wunder came 2nd cause he was not as good on other rounds as with this concerto. Nothing to do with the fact she's a woman, though for once it was a woman, she got her victory tarnished by sexists and people for whom a 2nd prize was not enough for Wunder. It's not an inclusive agenda byt the competition, it's a sexist one by too many people.

@@Luxsword29 i saw every of those performances, she came 1st in the previous stage but he was the one who deserved it imo. I prefered every of his performance to avedeeva ones

Just so.

Not even last 3 min! This is the best Concerto E-moll in history.

You're right. Seeing him so happy, expecially during the 3rd movement, puts a smile on my face

Ditto!

Absolutely true!

@@kurasfx1720 yes one of the worst competitions ever I have experienced

@@kurasfx1720 i think you didnt get the point. Of course not and im talking about the 2010 competition only.

@@kurasfx1720 dont talk about the politics matters and hope we concentrate on the music topic. The concerto is the final piece and that is played at the final stage. Ingolf was the best concerto playet and score showed his greatness in the total point, however, rules have changed within the compeition period out of sudden and the final result came out for her winning.

Year, I agree!

Maybe it's my opinion, but he's one of the best chopin pianist

Trifonov’s was terrible.

@@ilovemycatrussell9298 too many mistakes

Beautiful person wrote such beautiful words

Assolutamente d'accordo, sotto ogni punto di vista meritava il primo posto

Trans = A piano that flows beautifully while changing nuances. Orchestra, sound, all images.

Vibrato.

神懸かってますよね。 第三楽章に限ればブーニンをもしのいでいると思います。

はい。第一楽章から落ち着いているので期待して聴き進めました。第三楽章は作曲者と対話するような高揚感ですね。でも地に足がついているので、ストレートに感動しました。

そうですね。ショパコンが決勝だけで審査するならおそらくヴンダーが優勝だったでしょうね。実際は1次からの累積点で審査するみたいですから…。 ポーランドでも｢優勝はヴンダーだと思った｣という人がずいぶんいたようです。

+Meho Take そうなのですね(^-^)。このステージは特に音楽として大成功したのだと思います。インゴルフさんは曲の理解に努め、指揮者を尊敬し、オーケストラと積極的に協調したので、会場全体から祝福されたのでしょう。 もう、何回も再生しちゃってます♬ m(_ _)m。

Yes, of course, this concert could not possibly be played any better. Mr. Wunder is SUPERB, but he comes from the "wrong" ethnic background. He is not Polish, not Russian, not Jewish, nor is he Asian, so how could "they" POSSIBLY have ever even CONSIDERED letting him win? I know that's an ugly thing to say, but I feel deep in my bones that it must be true. Van Cliburn's 1958 victory in Moscow, must have been a FLUKE, and then look how shabbily he was treated ever afterward. Avdeeva is an excellent player, but she is physically unattractive, and has a rather grim, too businesslike platform manner that totally lacks charisma. Unlike Ingolf Wunder's infectious enthusiasm for his task and full-blooded, unabashed "glorying in the flower," there is no evidence of JOY in Avdeeva's playing. Yes of COURSE Ingolf Wunder should have won. But the world is what it is, and always will be, I'm afraid. Have you heard Aljosa Jurinic yet? If not, you're in for a treat.

Also, females haven't won for decades. They would like to have a female winner to show political correctness. I strongly support gender or racial equality but I hate any kind of gender or racial influence in a competition. In my opinion, the same thing happened in 2017 Oscar, too (Moonlight won because of its racial background). Isn't letting the minority win a kind of bias itself?

Oh, there's also another thing worth mentioning. One of the jury in the competition is once Mr. Wunder's teacher. Maybe they gave him 2nd because they didn't want to be considered as flavoring a jury's student.

Such nasty things said here.

葉宗融 do you have the score in that year?

totally agree ... it almost ruins it

They fixed it 2 years latter

maybe she slept with the judges haha

Not to detract from Yulianna's accomplishment. But "TPTB" might have reined in the PC!

Wunders and Geniasus tio!

her performance was also great and she was great at all stages of the competition. wunder deserved his concerto prize, but not the 1st prize.

In comparison with Yulianna Avdeeva, Wunder is amateur! He is very predictable and dryasdust! Yulianna is true master of piano!

The winner was and is Mrs. Yulianna Avdeeva because she deserved it. It was Martha Argerich, who was a member in the jury and she has learned how to use her ears and intellect.

@@prokastinatore i don't know, if almost everyone thinks he deserved to win, than, there is a reason

@@_ydhdh9340Many of the competitors deserved to win because they are all wonderful in different ways. Him and Yulianna were both amazing, but there could only be one winner and the jury liked Yulianna better. That’s just how competitions are. But both of them have successful careers and global recognition, and not just them, but many other great competitors too in this competition. So in a way, everyone was a winner.

Wow 🤔