Just imagine if someone made a variant of this map with every road changed to a shoal or bridge

@@lpsp442 That'll just make me sad. Koal is one of those CO's that sparks a little more fun for me because of how fringe he can be.

@@AdvanceWarrior Koal is a cruel taskmaster and ruthless CO - sometimes you get what you deserve! Love his theme music tho

Yeah i saw- i recorded this a month ago so too late to pull it

@@DeejusProductionsIt's no big deal. Your input gave me a new perspective on the match.

Thanks my dude, glad you enjoyed!

There isn't, though. Income is obviously tied, and who is ahead on army value? Whoever played the last turn before day limit, which is ALWAYS player 2. That is not to say there are no alternatives, for example live game tiebreaks could be a solution.

​@@aa01blue38 I admit I don't have the answers. Who knows maybe they can apply some rocket science mathematics, clearly having a committee to determine who is the winner is far from the best route. Hopefully those smarter than me can figure it out.

​@@aa01blue38 just thinking, I would rather this game be decided by rock, paper, scissors in a tie (I'm keeping it simple). At least the players have a form of control. It's unorthodox for sure, maybe not the best option, but at least it's better than this "committee decides". This isn't a real world sport that needs judges.

@@fantasystar7777 Isn't boxing's referee breaking ties with also decisions ? Also rock paper scissor is too luck based to be acceptable in tournament even player can choose one of them and map comitees judge based on objective values first then create a new match if there isn't different objective values (Income or game's default automatic tiebreaker then Unit count, Kill/Death Ratio, Income generated, is one of the player can win in 1-3 turn(s) like uninterruptable HQ cap or Lab cap if HQ replaced by Lab ? (basically mate-in-1 or guranteed mate-in-x but in advance wars instead chess), if all of those's answer is no / both players is the same then the map comitee just create a new match with probably same setting or less stalematey setting like live format), all of those variable are controllable by the players with enough skill unless it's Mixed-Base Fog or the game is lottery like playing with/against luck COs or gamechanging luck rolls.

They could do over time. First to cap a property.

Haha thanks for the kind words my dude, do whatever you want (other than consuming Subway tm during a game)

I am a conscious food enjoyer from Europe. Subway would never cross my lips you can be sure of that! @@DeejusProductions

Subway? Never heard of that edible ;)

I feel this is an ongoing problem of awbw not having a sudden-death mode and neither a judge call. Once it's done, it's done. Every tournament is the same thing. Would be interesting something like "funds are cut after x day", or, "can't build more units", "next cap wins" and so on. Of course, people might say that it would favour some COs, but in the end, it's a game. Being satisfying is part of it, can't be all technical.

I didn't understand that move either. Very sloppy from a top player like talose.

To be fair, it's not much different from a decision in combat sports.

It would be the same IMO 35 days, depending who you're playing with, already feels forever

Not too bad of a idea I think, but the day limit would be increased before the match even started and then just say cut off day is 30/35 etc.

If you couldn't hold the props as your win con then you lost. Makes sense to me.

@@Pm3m_Dia They had the same amount of properties after the daylimit. In that case, whey decide who "would probably win from now on". Stupid

Isn't that kind of how boxing works? I don't follow it at all but I'm pretty sure I've heard they basically have panels of judges who decide who wins each round.

@@blahmaster6k yes but boxing is a quite a different sport