Introduction to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason

Рет қаралды 17,708

Күн бұрын

It might appear self evident how we humans interact in the world of objects, but this is exactly what Kant questions in his Critique of Pure Reason. For how do come to know the objective world? What does Kant mean when he claims that we need pure a priori intuitions to be abele to see the world in the first place, and that we need categories of the understanding to "think" objects? This and more will be discussed in this video.
---Contents of this video --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0:00 - Intro
1:14 - Part I: Pure Reason
12:40 - Part II: Structure Makes Perfect
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
📧Contact: info@eversbrothers.com
🌐Website: eversbrothers.com/productions/

Пікірлер: 26

@alfonso201 2 жыл бұрын

Speaking from my "experience" you are good at condensing philosophical subjects into digestible format without misconstruing them which what usually happens in yt, would also like a vid on heidegger and deleuze.

@jacobfranco3378 2 жыл бұрын

You really are on a roll with these videos. Good job man. Bless

@hendricka3029 Жыл бұрын

This is an excellent introduction! You have earned yourself a new subscriber!

@LTDsaint15 7 ай бұрын

A wonderfully constructed intro to Kant! Congratulations and thank you very much!

@deadmeme2403 2 жыл бұрын

By god you need way more subsriber, this stuff is so good it's unfair.

@pratikgore6536 Жыл бұрын

I love your videos, and deserve more views.

@rafaelcarvalho3928 2 жыл бұрын

Your videos are so so goooood.

@legendsplayground7017 4 ай бұрын

thanks, it's simple to understand this way, God bless ya

@michaelmacisaac7742 16 күн бұрын

Beautiful presentation… does the explication of categories and conditions for human knowledge presuppose an agent with basic analytic tools to conduct the analysis,ie Plato’s third man? Are all circles fatal? Is it turtles and wave functions all the way down?🐣

@MineKrowa 2 жыл бұрын

awesome video man

@Orion225 Жыл бұрын

Great one. You got a new sub .

@existentialexplorations4900 3 ай бұрын

Very good.

@vaishnavikarnik1578 Жыл бұрын

❤

@hippodino4965 26 күн бұрын

An time goes by, now (5+7=12) is analytic statement.

@JohnDoe-hr4xj 4 ай бұрын

Bedankt.

@eversbrothersproductions1476 4 ай бұрын

Graag gedaan.

@kadaganchivinod8003 Жыл бұрын

Is there any particular reason starting KANT after Lacan?

@eversbrothersproductions1476 Жыл бұрын

That is a good question. The answer is that I wanted to read Kant for a long time, but I only got myself to start on his dense theory when I read that he could explain how the subject is able to think in the first place. Our goal all along is to reconstruct an argument that explains how we humans are what we are. And Lacan would be the last step of that journey since it explains the behaviour of subjects in the world. But Lacan does not give the scientific background as to how we got here and what aspects we need to become this subject. Also, I was reading Kant when I made the videos on Schopenhauer. Schopenhauer is a bit easier to understand than Kant. So in when I look at it now I think I would recommend reading Schopenhauer, than Kant and then Lacan. This gives a more complete picture 😄

@kadaganchivinod8003 Жыл бұрын

@@eversbrothersproductions1476 ❤️

@jacobfranco3378 2 жыл бұрын

Hegel or Heiddeger next pls

@eversbrothersproductions1476 2 жыл бұрын

I will go over all German Idealists, so I start with Kant, then to Fichte, Schelling and they all lead to the theory of Hegel. And then I will do some on Goethe. After that I will start with Heidegger! 😄 And then the whole story is complete.

@jacobfranco3378 2 жыл бұрын

@@eversbrothersproductions1476 bless your soul 🙏🙏🙏

@sgonzalez_guitarra Жыл бұрын

Hegel is a charlatan!

@Mark-ks7fe 8 ай бұрын

@@sgonzalez_guitarra?