JOry coming with some great content latley, keep it up buddy, love the channel

The question really should be "is an Invicta + $10,000 in the bank as good as a Rolex?"...

I'll soon be 73 years old and I've been wearing an Invicta Pro Diver for about 2 1/2 years. I wear it because I like it. The name means nothing to me. I've always purchased low cost watches due to my type of work. The Pro Diver is by far the best watch I've ever owned. I set it about every 3 days and it's usually about 1 minute off. It's a tough watch and really takes the abuse. Even though the Invicta has a Rolex look, I've never had anyone ask me if it's a Rolex. That is because today, 99%+ don't give a flip. What really turns people on today is a costly cell phone.

My experience: The typical Invicta wearer is a watch enthusiast. The typical Rolex wearer wants a status symbol.

The fact that you can compare a $80 Watch vs a $8000.- watch is insane! So do we pay to much for a Rolex? I think this is a yes!

I have a Rolex submariner, my friend has a Invicta sub, we don't even talk about it everyone thinks we wear the same watch

My Rolex was stolen at knifepoint Sept 2000. I bought my Invicta (shown above) a month after. It's been 21 yrs and it's a fantastic watch. Had I known about Invicta, I would've never bothered with my Rolex!!! Live and learn !!! Have a great day!!

I've owned both and still own the submariner. Bottom line is, the gap of saving for years and to aquire one is only gonna set you a couple of seconds closer every month between the two. A watch is a watch and any of these will tell the time accurately. And you dont need a fancy bling to live the present time no matter what the metal chunk on your wrist says. The money you invested in them is for yourself only and shouldn't temper on your current happiness or the ability to enjoy life altogether. Things don't need to be unreachable to be enjoyable

Pro diver is my main watch for 5 years. I never took it off my wrist on my daily basis. I have been diving, snorkeling swimming and everything without worrying. The mineral glass and the metals are extremely well built. Seiko NH35 movement also is very reliable.

Quite frankly, you'd be hard pressed to find another $80 watch that holds up so well compared to an 8k watch.

The main difference between the two watches is that the invicta can be used without constantly fearing to scratch it or be robbed...The Rolexes (in most cases) are destined to pass their life closed in a safe.

I have the Swiss movement version and changed a few things.. changed the bezel to a high quality ceramic bezel, added a sapphire crystal and changed the bracelet to a full stainless steel with no polish. I love it, it looks great, runs great and it has taken a few bad hits and still 0 scratches, i use it almost every day

Another old guy here (62). I bought an Invicta Pro Diver precisely because it looks so much like the Rolex Submariner worn by my favorite actor Steve McQueen, but I can’t justify spending 8000 bucks on a wristwatch. If anyone asks me if my watch is a Rolex I’ll just tell them no it’s not, and I’m not Steve McQueen. Love my Invicta and enjoyed your video.

Owned my Invicta for a few years. It keeps incredible time. The best of many many other automatics I own. Built like a tank and seems difficult to scratch. I have tried ☺️ I would recommend this watch.

I wouldn’t expect a $100 watch to feel like an $8k watch.

Loved the review. Admittedly, I don't own a Rolex and have never handled one in real life. However, I do own four Invictas, including two dive model automatics. All of my Invictas look great and have been super reliable. You simply cannot beat Invicta's quality for the money. As another commenter stated, they really are built like tanks. I have a 200M and a 300M for the dive watches. I certainly didn't buy them for the Rolex look. I bought them because they were Invicta!

Here’s the thing: the Invicta Pro Diver offers the best bang for the buck - period! You get a 200 meter diver with applied indices, screw down crown, screw down case back, a NH35 automatic movement from Seiko that can be regulated to within COSC specifications, meaning +- 2 seconds a day, a solid bracelet with solid end links and if you go for the blue dial you’ll also get one of the most amazing sunburst dials of all time, that goes from almost black over a deep to a medium blue all the way to purple depending on the light source and if you want you can have the watch either in two-tone or solid 18K gold plating and all that for less than a hundred bucks! It’s a no brainer!

the question is: is the Submariner 80 times better than the Invicta? probably not. Rolex is the better watch, better history, pedigree, status, movement, quality, finish, etc. If money is no issue, then, by all means, the Rolex is the way to go, it's the original one after all. If you can't pay 8 thousand dollars but want the look, I don't see why you wouldn't spend 100 bucks on it. It's pretty good for the money.

Been wearing my pro diver since 2000. Never serviced. It will never die. Even the gold tone has not worn off. Keeps perfect time. Mine has the miyota/citizen mvmt

Saving $8,400+ and still having a 95% similar to the Rolex Submariner watch on my wrisk is what would makes me happy. Great comparison BTW,

Bought an Invicta Pro Diver Quartz for my brother. He uses it for work, got smashes several times, still ticks and still look decent. He loves how it looks good, feels solid but it’s totally easy to replace should it ever brake. Great content as always!

I’m a watch guy and for that Rolex to be 30 years old it’s still beautiful. But for that invicta to be just under a 100 and it comes close or even better on some aspects it’s something to purchase. For someone who would never spend $8k or $32k for a watch, this invicta is something to buy without a thought. But it’s the name that people will pick one over the other

I've invested a large part of my family fortune in an Invicta.

I go with the Invicta all day long. The price difference is huge! You get enough watch for your money with Invicta

I have this Pro Diver and I love it. I also love Japanese watches like Seiko, Citizen, Orient, Casio, etc. that are between $150 - $700 and many are of a super quality, the movement, design and materials on these watches are of great quality. But I think is ridiculous to even think than a $100 watch can be compared to a $10k one.

I’m actually kind of impressed by the Invicta Pro Diver

A very fair comparison indeed. Maybe it would be fun to give both watches to a none watch person to review them, then tell them how much each one is worth :)

Honestly, I prefer the look of the Invicta over the Rolex. I know it's older but the Rolex just looks dated. The Invicta is more modern looking to me. The Rolex logo and an extra couple gaskets aren't worth anywhere near an almost $8k difference in my opinion. Invicta all day. You can buy 80+ Invictas for the same money and never once get caught wearing the same piece in public twice. An overwhelming majority wouldn't even be able to distinguish between the two if the logos were removed, which probably doesn't sit well with people who dump the equivalent of a used car's worth on a wrist timepiece. This isn't the 19th or 20th century anymore, watches should not cost more than $500 unless it's a legitimate antique or collector's item.

My invicta pro diver has survived 3 years, 6 different countries, snow, water and accidents. Honestly, whatever the criticism might be about it, its built to last and it certainly doesn't break the bank👏🏼

I actually like the wings on the second hand it reminds me of an old aviation based watch

That pro diver looks mighty fine. Good affordable watch.

I've had two other Pro Divers and recently bought another. I don't like most Invicta models but Pro Divers are a good value for money. Spot on about branding.

I own 3 Invicta divers and I can say they are a tough well made watch keep great time ! Brilliant value 👍

Bought an older model of this Pro Diver 7 years ago and it still works fine. Perfect beater watch that looks good and you don't start freaking out if someone brushes up against you.

This watch was only 55 bucks for Prime Day on Amazon. I picked one up and am eagerly awaiting its delivery.

As someone looking at saving over a period of years to get a Sub, wearing a Pro Diver to see how the dimensions of the watch would hold up in day to day use would be very useful. That said the Invicta looks like a very good watch in it's price range.

Glad I subscribed. You cover all the important details and specs without sounding boring. Keep up the great work. A+

To me, never mind the Rolex, I'm saving up for the Invicta Pro Diver. I couldn't care less if it's a homage watch. I just like the look, the decent quality build and it'll fall within my budget. Thanks for the comparison video.

I'm just weird, all the Invicta bashing actually makes me want one now lol.....

To me it seems like the Invicta Pro Diver is a great value. I do not think you can beat this watch as a value. Comparing this watch to a Rolex is indeed a testimony to the value. I wear it as an every day do anything type watch. TY MH

Really enjoyed watching this review. Would love to own a sub at some point. I currently own the Invicta Pro, I also own Ginault Ocean Rover, both of these models get the most hate on forums. For me that's fine, I enjoy them for what they are....affordable alternatives.

At the end of the day. Its just meant to tell time. Im frugal so I’d go for the invicta.

I have had an Invicta for 3 months. Using a seconds per day checker,and recording everyday,it is .3 seconds per day average. Worn. This is fantastic in any watch. Pressure tested when new and passed 200 meters. I am going to pressure check it soon again. Yes the lens scratches. Not the watches fault. Mine. For 80.00 it sets the new standard for me at least.

I was very hesitant on buying the invicta, I have bulova's, omega's & grand seiko's. I want a Rolex, however my grand seiko imo is a better watch then a Rolex. But, it isn't a Rolex! -Invicta, I use as a work watch. If I scratch it, I don't worry about it. It's definitely a nice watch for the price, I get a lot of positive comments on it from customers. It is definitely an eye catcher for people who know watches! I like it!

Bang for the buck, I LOVE the pro diver. I got the blue one for Father's day for $72 and its beautiful. At 100x less cost than a Rolex, I wear it to my job where it could easily get broken and I'm not worried. And, I LOVE an exhibition caseback. All mechanical movements I love to see. It has gained about 7 seconds in a month with just regular daily wear. So, for my purposes, and for a first automatic watch, it works great. I'm not trying to impress anyone else. If I did want to, I'd wear my '67 Seamaster chrono.

Poor man's Rolex?...more like a wise man's Rolex 😁... The Invicta is great 👍....

A very honest opinion about both watches. The Invicta is an homage of the Rolex sub so there's no basis for comparison. However, if you can't afford the original sub, then Invicta is your sure bet. I've got one myself From Amazon.

Just purchased my first Invicta pro diver 8927OB 2tone. Purely bought for looks and to start on the watch collecting ladder. Thus far reasonably impressed with it. Price great, quality I’m thinking great, the fact it’s a less than £100 watch and comes with a 3yr warranty, honestly who could go wrong.

Never thought I would say this in a million years but this video has made me seriously contemplate buying an Invicta.

Lots of Rolex owners may well be wearing Invictas come Christmas.

100% recommend putting a nato strap on the Invicta, makes for a great casual watch. Much more comfortable than the metal bracelet it comes with too, I couldn't get mine to fit perfectly.

Great review. As far as a watch not “feeling” the same, I own dozens of watches expensive and inexpensive, after I wear any of them for a few minutes I barely feel anything. The bottom line for me is do I like the look of the watch, does it look good on my wrist, and most importantly is it precise and accurate, AND a good value? In my experience, Rolexes become highly inaccurate, every one of them I’ve experienced. They need to be serviced often at great cost and for a $6000-$36,000 price point they should at least not lose 2 minutes per day! You are paying for the Swiss Rolex name but seriously, even my 50 year old cheap-ass Timex indiglo still keeps perfect time! A better Swiss value is my Swiss Oris Big Crown Pointer date 80th anniversary bronze case leather strap watch, $1500! Oris was making fine watches before Rolex and this watch has always kept perfect time, unique, and in my humble opinion at least 777 times better than the submariner, oh yeah, and “FEELS” much much better! Ha ha! Again, great review, I like the solid gold submariner much better but again $36,000, worth it?, between the two you reviewed, very, very minor things with the Invicta, get it instead of the Rolex. I agree with you about the over branding in watches as well, but the swirling wings on the second is t that big of a deal since I wouldn’t be staring at that so much while wearing the time piece. I also own the Seiko Presage in brown, love it too but yeah, did they need to write presage on it, not that big of a deal, bigger to me is that it loses about 4 seconds a day! I need to remove the back and re-adjust the regulation. Thanks again for the review, Sir. I think for Invicta, the Invicta Men's I-Force 44mm Stainless Steel and 18k Gold Ion-Plated and Brown/Black Leather Watch (Model: 12823, 15255, 21393) is much better feeling and much better to look at and it is only $52 on Line.

My take on watches is I like to wear the watches I get but I don’t want to have to worry about it getting stolen or scratched or damaged. At even 1000.00 watch i would worry about all those. So to get something that has a respectable albeit basic automatic movement and looks nice that I won’t be afraid to wear and keeps decent time better than a sundial. I could careless the brand as long as it isn’t gaudy or looking like I am trying to FLEX those “HEY LOOK AT ME” vibes. So i took a ‘chance’ and purchased an INVICTA paid around 50.00 for an automatic movement watch. It’s not big or flashy and looks nice on my wrist. Keeps good time, the dial/Bezel fees nice and not too tight not too loose. The lume which most have described as low to medium low was actually very bright and i only held a LED flashlight on it for about a min. It fades fairly quickly. The strap kinda sucks but I replace all mine with NATO bands anyway. I was dreading getting the watch and considered not even opening it and just returning it based on all the hate some of the KZfaqrs were giving invicta watches. But I found 95% of what they said not to reflect on my experience. But I am not a high end watch guy, just like i don’t own a Ferrari and don’t own 1000.00 suits or expensive anything. I am a common man who likes decent watches that look good at a decent price. And I think that is more the norm than the ones who buy Rolexes and high end watches. If you are a guy like me the invicta pro diver is a decent watch - hate their bands though - get a nato if you get an invicta

I have a invicta pro diver in blue and quite honestly for the money its not a bad watch. I do have other more expensive watches but really enjoy the pro diver. Almost as much as I enjoy the time teller videos. I have even gotten watches because of your videos. Keep up the great work Jory.

I've worn Invicta for years and this is a very fair review. The whole point of the Pro Divers is that it looks and almost feels like a Rolex, but it isn't. As such it's an attractive and affordable watch for people who don't have dinner guests to impress at their Napa Valley wine club, or don't need that extra 100m of diving depth lol "I'm not arguing the Invicta is a bad watch, I'm arguing it doesn't feel the same as the Rolex." For a 7-8 thousand price difference it shouldn't, and I don't expect it to.

Appreciate your honest opinions. But at 1% of the cost, I feel good about my Invicta purchase. But im not a watch collector, just a guy that needs a good watch to wear daily at my job. Thanks!

Nothing beats the smoothness of the Seiko Spring drive second hand.

Have had my Invicta Pro Diver for a bit over a year and has worn it daily. It has went through hell, banged up, scratched and chipped but it still runs strong with its battle scars. I've actually cracked the edge of the crystal and was a bit concerned about its water resistance but it seems to hold pretty well still.

Thank you for this in-depth review! I got some Invicta, actually I own this very model. I've never worn it. It is sitting inside its original package... After your disamina, I will take my Invicta pro-dive out for a walk. At the moment I'm really inlove with my Glycine combat sub (pre invicta, just to say). I've bought it second hand, but it opened my heart from the first moment I wore it. I own many watches, including Swiss, Russian but mostly Japanese ones, few Chinese ones. I hope one day to save enough to allow myself to buy a Breitling Chromomat or maybe a Tudor Black Bay, these are my goals. The Rolex are far more expensive for my wallet. Hope everyone is good! Cheers to everyone!

Great video, liked everything in it. I'm not an Invicta fan, but I do appreciate their homage watches. I bought a $75 Invicta pro diver which I can use anywhere, went to beach with it, went to the water with it, didn't mind the sand or small rocks getting all over the watch, because it was cheap. On the other hand, I haven't seen a person with a Rolex or Omega doing the same, they usually use these high quality watches for dinner, meetings, etc. It has become a valuable "show off" watch, and there is nothing wrong with that. It would be nice to see a rolex submariner being used for what it was built for: a diver watch, but no one will do that due to its high cost. So yeah, that's why I appreciate the Invicta pro diver (not the other monstrosities) it has the looks and is built to resist beach/ocean activities without the worry of losing an expensive item.

Great review. I have a 1675 GMT with a 93150 sub bracelet and a few Invicta Pro Divers. The Invictas are good for scuba diving (in case it gets lost) and when I am nervous about theft (traveling, etc.). That said, my Rolex exudes quality & longevity; my son will inherit it and I hope cherish it. The Invictas, although essentially Rolex copies fulfill a different purpose.

I love these comparisons between an $8,000 Rolex and an $80 Invicta. You will notice right away that the Rolex has a smoother crown and there is a gasket. Yep, that's worth about $1,000 right there isn't it.

Invicta pro diver is one of my favorite if not my favorite watch. I own 30ish watches now and pro drivers get tons of wrist time.

One thing that caught my eye was there is more printed info on the Rolex dial compared to Invicta dial. A detail I did like is how the hour and date window are outlined and pop more. I can't help wonder what the current Rolex compares to the Invicta. But I do appreciate your caparison between the two. Clearly the price tag is the most outstanding difference between them. For $8200. I could buy a good used car or truck and a box of Cuban cigars. Hands down Rolex is the standard for some watch people but addressing the collectors, Invicta makes it affordable to build a collection that has a huge variation of models. Now weather that's a good thing or not it is up to the collector to decide. Thanks for sharing the comparison. 👍🏻👍🏻🇺🇸

One of the best KZfaqrs. Very clear and honest communication and comprehensive review. This was very enjoyable.

I'm 14 and I like watches but I'm starting off with this Invicta as my gateway watch into collecting,is it a good start?

You don't have to be an Invicta "fan boy" to like the 8926. I own one and love it, but I don't really care for most of their watches. Most people can't spend 8 grand on a Rolex.

Just found this review and I must say very comprehensive in detail oriented. Excellent! I completely agree with what you said as I own a 1986 Rolex two-tone sub bluesy, and I bought the Invicta pro diver. There is no comparison as far as the feel on the wrist and preciseness/smoothness of the crown. But we’re talking about a sub $100 watch versus a watch that is now worth around $10-$12,000. As my comment seems to be the most recent, I will say that living in a nice area in Southern California, I am fearful to wear my watch out in public as the instances of people being robbed and beaten for their luxury watch is now out of control. I wear a beautiful Certina ds diver which is a top quality Swiss watch and flies under the radar of thieves.

Have had the Invicta pro diver for a year love it. Really really good in person and keeps good time if you wear it all the time. Otherwise power reserve is about 2 days. Really nice weight and feel, definitely worth if if you're looking at it.

Jory; I'm actually going to say that this was a decent review. First and foremost I'm a Seiko fan but, I also am an Invicta fan. I have several comments but nothing belligerent. So that you get the model number correct I'm using lower case. The Invicta is model is 8926ob. I like the wing on the second ✋ and like you not a fan of the wing below the 12. I have owned this model and have given it as a gift to friends and family. I've owned 9 variations of the "Seiko" movement Pro Divers and never had issues with any of them. The name etched on the side doesn't bother me. Even an "I" in the Invicta font would have sufficed or even using one of their two logo's. Less is more? What about the lengthy 4-line novel above the 6 on the Submariner? How many watches

Fair review, I thought. Thanks for making all of these entertaining videos. My two-cents is there is a place for Invicta and there is a place for Rolex. I appreciate that Invicta makes this watch, even though I know it's blatantly unfair as an imitation design and many of Invicta's diverse original designs have a tendency to be... a bit 'out there.' I own the Invicta and will probably never own that Rolex Submariner. 3 general things I have come to notice and/or appreciate about Invicta: 1) They make watches on a large-scale with very high economies of scale to bring down costs. The market for people who won't pay more than $100 for a watch is huge. They are managing to produce good watches with such limitations. The watches they are producing for these masses are pretty good for them. They're water-proof and they can be banged around a little bit and if something happens, they're ultimately at a price point they're replaceable. 2) Cheap watches help us find our style before shelling out a ton of money. I know some argue this as a waste, but I appreciated those early years when my budget was tight that I could start my collection and try many things. It was through this I learned what I liked and what I didn't before I spent more money. These watches, and many others, are like a gateway drug. I developed my personal taste in watches over many years. Present-me does not see things the same way as Past-me. This Invicta allows me to not experience the prestige, attention to detail, or as solid construction of the Rolex. However, it does allow me to come close to experiencing the general style and that is something I appreciate and I'm glad to have in my varied collection. 3) Less of an appreciation and more of a criticism. You still get what you pay for. What gets cheaper with mass production, comes at a loss of quality and quality control. The luxury brands are created with heavy marketing, but that also means they protect that marketing by trying to create perfection. You can't sell something $5,000+ and have it break easily or not ensure that all watches you produce carry the same quality and be able to maintain the value of that brand. I have owned 3 Invicta watches. This version of the diver watch I own had the rotating bezel break within 2 weeks of owning it without heavy usage, improper usage, or being knocked around at all. I suspect the ratcheting part inside was creating too friction and bent itself out of place. Another watch was not an imitation, but a self-designed army style. It was actually a decent built watch in terms of how solid the construction was, but it has some major errors in the attention to detail of the design that I didn't notice until I bought it and wore it. Problems: 1) the hour and minute hands were black with a large lume design in the center. The dial was black. The design of the Lume on both hands was about the same size. I couldn't tell time at a glance. I had to look more carefully for the end of the black hands. 2) It had a rotating sub-dial that pointed to the day of the week. They used a push-button to rotate it. The watch was not a chronograph, but wanted it to have the appearance of one. They problem is it was way too easy to bump that button. The movement broke and is no longer functional, but the earliest problem was this subdial broke and soon after the hour hand wouldn't move either. I believe the button for the subdial was activated during times that could damage the movement if it was adjusted. The movements are often budget range movements from reputable companies As a buyer... lessons learned, however I expect these types of issues to not come up if someone is designing and developing them with a critical eye. Still, I've enjoyed my Invicta Diver with the now non-rotating bezel. When I buy my first multi-thousand dollar diver, I will probably get a Omega Seasmaster. I still appreciated the Invicta's and other cheap brands of the world that allowed me to try different styles over time and allowed me to learn my personal interests in style to help in making those decisions. For now my main diver is still a far more budget friendly Bulova Oceanographer. I like the throwback to the past, I appreciate designs that come from a heritage of American crasftmanship, and I appreciate that it is a watch fewer people wear and allows me to be more unique. I fully agree with you about the depth of the casing to the dial. I noticed this wearing the Invicta diver. That was my biggest criticism of the Invicta diver personally. They do make the finish of it look better or more interesting, if it is left that large. Beyond the size of that metal wall, It looks cheaply brushed. Thanks for all of the interesting videos!

I recently picked up one of these on Amazon during a Black Friday sale for $30. I was just looking for an inexpensive analog watch that was all metal. I'm not even close to being a watch aficionado and I had no clue that this was a Rolex look-alike. I feel I definitely got something worth more than I paid for and have no complaints at all. It does exactly what I need it to do - it sits on my wrist, looks good, and keeps decent time.

I have the same series Submariner but in gold and steel. Received it as an employee bonus back in 1988 or so. I selected it personally as I had always loved the look of that watch, plus I was a James Bond fan since the age of 10. I wore that watch 24/7 until about a year ago when I sent it in to be refurbished. The tritium was flaking off the dial, I had chipped a small piece off the edge of the crystal, the arms were experiencing some sort of degradation and I really wanted to be able to tell time in the dark without having to find my phone. The cost of the upgrades were half the price of the watch, but it is now like new except that the luminescence is only on the arms and bezel pearl, and not the hour markers. Some would say that I ruined the patina of the original, but I use this watch as a tool and not as an investment. I wore this watch while surfing, rock climbing, mountain biking, diving, skiing and everything else. Great watch and not one for the penny-pinchers, but it is worth triple what it cost brand new. The watch this replaced was a Seiko and I loved that one as well. I agree with the opinions stated in this review. I also think that for the price, the Invicta is a total bargain since most people don't care anyway. Wear what makes you happy, even if it's just counting the money you saved. I saved over $100k by not buying the Porsche GT-3 I covet. LOL.

It's very common for homage watches to have deeper chapter rings that taper down to a smaller dial. The crystal also tends to be more set back into the case. Not sure why they do that.

I love my Invicta Pro Diver Mickey Mouse edition. I will never compare it to a Rolex, for me, these are two completely different watches

I bought one in about 2005 and lost it. I just a new one and am VERY impressed by the Invicta. It feels very robust and well built. I just saw a video on KZfaq of a guy who had one for 18 years and it is still running.

I am looking for a watch or two for my 60th later this year. I would like a SeaGull ST1901 movement watch, probably the Red Star 1963 40mm gooseneck 21 jewel at around £140 but the Invicta Pro Diver looks like a very good contender for under £100. I actually like the second hand and etched logo on the side to show it is not trying to be a 1:1 clone. Nice review and new sub

So I can have an “extra” 100 m wr and 9 extra hours and a huge servicing commitment or I can have a watch which I can cheaply replace if I need to AND a car🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I happen to like the wings on the second hand with the little cross on the wings.

Good honest review, definitely helpful, gonna buy myself a few of these Invicta watches

Ok, just found this searching your channel after I already commented on your Orient diver's watch review, thanks for both. For those who disagree with you on the wear of the two watches, I own the Invicta Pro Diver, it is an awesome watch and for me wears comfortable on my wrist, but here is the deal. If I came into a windfall of money and decided to buy the Rolex Submariner and it was not more comfortable than the $80 Invicta I would be soooo pissed at Rolex, I mean, let's get real. If the Rolex turned out to be much more comfortable on the wrist than my Invicta I would not be one iota upset with Invicta, again, it is an $80 watch. Great reviews and videos I am glad I found your channel.

Perfect honest assessment thanks for your enjoyable videos

I watched this with great interest as I have both watches. This video turned me into a subscriber, so, well done!. Yes, the submariner does have a more refined feel to it all around (of course, it does!!!). But none of the annoying issues you found with the Invicta come close to justifying that enormous price difference. Funny thing, I have owned both watches for a number of years and I find that the Invicta, with its less sophisticated movement, to be the more accurate time keeper. One last thing, Those two details which you find annoying, the wings on the tail end of the second hand and the engraved "INVICTA" on the side, I'll bet that both were done to avoid trademark legalities.

I just bought this invicta watch second hand ( as new ) for £54 For 185 times that price there was a rokex submariner on there as well. My wallet.wouldn't stretch to the rolex but this Invicta is a lovely watch.....and for the money its a steal. Looks good, keeps great time and it's comfortable to wear.

So I love my watches have many. My daily timepiece is an Invicta Pro Diver Titanium. I have to say after 5-6 years of wear the clips clasps and crown are all very smooth now. The Crown is tight fitting yet very smooth now. I love the balance and the moderate weight. I had a stainless Invicta Pro Diver, and the weight took a long time to get used to. Try the titanium!

Jory, a great video! You did a great job balancing the pro's of each watch and at the end of the day, both have a place in the watch world.

21:07 Jory: So, this isn't going to glow at all. Me, a pro diver owner: Neither is the Invicta, buddy! Trololol. The pro diver is always going to be a special watch for me. It's what got me into this hobby. I bought it on happenstance, not even knowing what an automatic watch was. While it has that emotional value for me, let's be real, ya gets what ya pays for.

Thanks for a very informative, very fair review. I really needed to hear what you had to say. Keep up the great work.

Pro tip (possibly) - as an owner of several watches with clasps like this I’ve found that putting a finger between the clasp and your wrist, then pushing laterally - like towards the clasp not pulling straight up - pops it right off really easy.

I bought an Invicta last week.....very good quality I would say

I know Invicta get some bad press but They not all that bad considering the price, also it looks good too.

I got two Invicta's a couple years ago. Invicta has some features I like, the magnification bubble is nice & I like the crystal. Any Invicta's under a $100 are close outs. I bought a Omega Seamaster, which I like very much. It has a presence on my wrist. If you watch shop, you'll notice the difference of the Omega once you pick it up. Like the old ad for a food sauce tag line was "what is inside counts for the difference in taste." Omega has metal movements versus cheaper makes which most likely use plastic. Spend more & you'll be more satisfied in the long run.

Had that invicta a couple of times, like it a lot, gave both to friends that kept telling me how nice it looked, now saving for the Deepsea sea dweller. Good episode Mr Goodman.

All those points you stated about the etching, second hand and "too much" advertising on the case. I completely agree with you. That being said they had a lawsuit for looking too much like a rolex so they were forced to add the etching.

I own a Rolex Datejust and an Invicta Pro Diver and I love them both. Thanks for the video.

Considering that the Rolex is 100x more expensive than the Invicta ($100 vs $10,000) brings to mind the quote attributed to Ben Franklin, our first secretary of treasury, "A fool and his money is soon parted! " - So true, and thank you for the great review.

I love the look of the Rolex, but I would never spend more than 3 figures on a watch. The Invicta is a much more reasonable alternative. Yes, it's derivative, but imitation is the sincerest form of flattery

The large engraved INVICTA letters on the casing is my least favorite part of this watch, too.

Great video. I am in the market for an affordable diver and was considering the Casio Duro but I think the Invicta is better for around the same price. Thanks ... ( nice Rolex btw.. )

I got a new Quartz Invicta pro diver for $33. It's beautiful. I LOVE all my Invicta watches, tyvm.