lol what ur middle wing

RADICAL CENTRIST

I love you Allen

@@dimebagdale based

Then if I think you are a turkey wing does that mean I am a chicken wing? Tbh I always thought of myself more as a quail

Protection based on religion FTW

I guess I'm a Mandalorian then.

@@marleyjr00 This is the way

American*

@@alexlaws5086 facts. True Americans are basically Mandalorians

Hell yeah

Woo hoo!

Yeah those blasters work great when you are up against a Base Delta Zero capable ship in orbit above your militia.

@@mattstorm360 remember the Ewoks?

@@mattstorm360 it worked out fine for the Sand People

Who's scruffy?

If the Republic can own a military star ship, I should too.- Jedi man Franklin

Them mothafuckas had wings???

@@redendive5068 that's what Mace Windu said.

Arms are not for hunting , they are to provide a check on an interstallar government with soldiers that cant shoot for shit and have no inclination to do so ( after some thought , much thought )

Casbott, I believe that you mean Mynocks, not Ewoks.

Eh I prefer porg meat

They can have my slug thrower when they pry it from my cold dead hands

No army in the world has even a chance of breaking through the Grizzly Garrison

Not that the bears understand most of them are still figuring out the controls and their aim. Except maybe Yogi an the Famous Park ranger bear... its one thing to shoot a bear, its another yall when the bear shoots you.. just ask any Stormtrooper on Endor

@@robertagu5533 Famous park ranger... You talking about Smokey?

@@alexlaws5086 smokey, yogey, wicket...

@@robertagu5533 Smokey is the park ranger bear. That's what I was talking about.

Considering that just like the SandPeople's SlugThrowers anyone with a lick of sense can assemble a working Pew Pew from common hardware store parts, its unlikely even the most Totalitarian Pew-Control will ever do what those in control want it too.

@@grayeaglej It's actually easier to make a gun automatic than semi-auto. You have to add a bunch of parts to make it stop after one shot. Making a semi-auto into full auto is simply a matter of filing down a single sear, something that cycling the action enough times will do. Most of the guns I've heard about that happening to were WWII 1911s that kept being used for decades afterwards.

@@tickticktickBOOOOM "Filing down the sear" is sort of a semi-myth. Yes there are a few models of pistol and semi-auto rifle that its possible to do that, ive owned two myself, however there is nothing but the blowback and recoil spring to control the cyclic rate and so you end up with constant jams and failures to feed. Also the few weapons this "hack" works on almost all have magazine capacities under 10 rounds, making them useless as automatic weapons. Now yes, building a blowback operated pistol caliber auto is far less mechanically complex than trying to build an interupter trigger group to make a semi auto, and once you get into the case pressures of rifle rounds you have to start dealing with action lockup otherwise you can explode your face. O.o What I was specifically referring to though was the Filipino/South American "Liberator Shotgun", a slam fire single shot made from two sizes of pipe. Its intended to be used to blast a large hole in an enemy at short range from ambush so that a "freedom fighter" could then take the Enemy's superior weapons. Thats how most criminals get thier weapons as well, in places where only the Police and Military have guns "Criminals" use homemade weapons, knives, clubs, etc to ambush the Cops/Soldiers and take thier weapons. Or they find corrupt Cops/Soldiers willing to sell them weapons, or they steal from Squad Cars, Politicians/Cops/Soldiers homes, Armories, etc. Even if the Government COMPLETELY disarms the People, as long as the GOVERNMENT still has weapons then CRIMINALS will still have access to those same weapons.

That is like saying Given the nature of our planet I cannot see how they can regulate guns it's simple you ban something law abiding citizens won't use it. Criminals will. Star wars is very much like our civilization you just have to look logically

@@jakestark2483 This is a very, very naive view. Just because you ban something or make it illegal doesn't mean that people will stop doing it...I give you illegal narcotics, any sort of crime, and oh yes, exceeding the speed limit. To think that "law abiding citizens" won't do something or possess something simply because some hack declares it illegal or bans it is a very misguided viewpoint.

@@jakestark2483 Bruh your just a kid that has been brain washed by public schools you even have a fckin lego darth vader as your profile pic let the grown ups talk lmao

@@jakestark2483 and then law abiding citizens are defenseless against the armed criminals.

@@kfeltenberger the definition of law abiding actually means they won't do it it's to follow the laws. So if you dont follow laws you are not a law abiding citizen its literally in the defintion. You need to correct yourself as for being naive you don't know anything about me when you assume you got only make an ass out of you and me, you also make yourself look stupid.

It's easy to cobble something together to kill people ahead of time. A can of gas and a road flare will be more than enough. Improvising while someone's trying to kill you, not so much.

@@tickticktickBOOOOM that is a fair point

Yeah non lethal is nice until you end up in civil court for “pain and suffering”. If you can come up with a non lethal device with no immediate or permanent repercussions, then hell flood the market with it. I’d be all for that.

You know what else is everywhere, dead younglings. Thanks, Master Qui-Gon

@@Excalibur01 so do we blame the lightsaber? Or do we blame anakin? Do we blame the blasters ? Or do we blame the clones?

@@masterqui-gonjinn90 we blame the extremely easy process of getting those weapons, not the weapons themselves. If you think that’s what the argument is, you’re not actually paying attention.

@@witturner2644 have you ever bought a gun?

@@witturner2644 The Master has a point it's actually a rather hard to get ahold of a firearm. Especially if you live in the big cities/north.

If you want to, and live in a country that recognizes that natural right, then yes: Carry on.

Be south of the mason Dixon line, no one will really question it

Well said, sadly the United States citizens have allowed its government to regulate away a lot of their gun rights. Back when the constitution was written a citizen could own the sames arms as the standing army, now I need an expensive and intrusive federal tax stamp to own any automatic firearm. I want to mount a .50 cal machine gun to my truck Damn it! 😄

@@joecool458 it’s best to build one if you really want it

@@lilrobi45xxx42 yeah but I want to be able to drive it around without being hassled by the feds.

@@joecool458 well, I don’t know what else to tell you.

@@lilrobi45xxx42 I have a coworker with an old jeep from the Korean conflict with decommissioned (non functional) .50 cal mounted to it. You should see the looks he gets when he takes it out for a drive. 😂

The 2A exists because of blood shed

Yet they keep taking it away day by day and in 2 years they might outright be 'illegal'. People just say things but never do them lol

@@rubengutierrez19 We'll see what happens then

Really, cuz a lot of other A's seem to be going the way of old yeller and not a lot of bloodshed to defend them.

@@rubengutierrez19 also worth noting state constitutions. In my state 11A gives the right to bear arms and specifically mentions the words "safety" and "protection" which is more lax that US 2A.

@Raybees TBH, as I re-watch Rebels it amazes me that Lucasfilm got away with a show that parallels the way America is going.

Please tell me that Palpatine's not the Senate.

"The Republic will be reorganized into the FIRST..... AMERICAN..... EMPIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Doesn't take firearms to protect oneself, and the main reason people get firearms is to feel safe.

@@johnathanwalker8395 Better to have one and not need it than not have one and need it

@@happychappy492 thats the only way your kids qre going to have access for their school shootings...I get it it

@@johnathanwalker8395 No you don't get it !

@@happychappy492 I do, firearms are to use offensively, not defensively. And people who feel the need to have them intend harm on others and are wildly delusional and paranoid

You are free to disagree. I happened to disagree and I still press the LIKE

The fact that you still have hope shows how much you're actually paying attention to the world.

?

This is the way

Yes, Director, this comment here.

Well said.

Agreed

Og Mandalorians: the founding fathers Mareel/Fett's true Mandalorians: Libertarians Death Watch: Confederates Satine's Mandalorians: democrats Mauls Mandalorians: Antifa Mid/post Imperial Mandalorians: libertarians again

either way, legal gun owners very rarely cause problems statistically. Most gun crime is done will illegally acquired guns since most criminals who use them in crimes are already felons

@@iamunamed5800 very true, not to mention that the ownership of firearms actually tends to decrease crimes not increase them, as most criminals will admit that someone possessing a firearm is a damn good reason not to mess with them

@@doow11 Don't let the liberals hear that. They'll say there's no correlations between increase of gun ownership and a decrease in crime

The reason Bounty Hunters are even a thing in Star Wars is because the Republic's only laws are about inter-planetary trade between members. Every planet has it's own legal system - there's so much red tape and so many loopholes that hiring a mercenary to kidnap or assassinate someone is usually cheaper and faster.

@@Grizabeebles cool

Blaster control is a joke in real life as well😳👀🤔

In the outer rim, at least. In the safer core worlds (with the exception of Coruscant and a few others) blasters are pretty rare.

People being able to own their own ships, load them with whatever and get past any form of customs definitely doesn't do much in terms of "control." Sure, the majority of people probably didn't own ships and had to take a shuttle (real world equivalent of an airline) and that may have been easier to control but Han Solo going wherever he goes rocking a DL-44 on his hip is nigh impossible to enforce. Blaster control is a joke, all the criminals have them and the law abiding citizens may as well too. The fact that law enforcement has to resort to bounty hunters in many cases to enforce some kind of justice is only further evidence that many law enforcement agencies in Star Wars are at best a borderline joke, but then again, what could they do in such a situation? Can ANY government effectively rule the galaxy?

even if cops can effectively protect people in the city, i dont care, i’d rather be armed.

Yeah, portland has become a perfect example.

Which is why the average citizen should be allowed to own tanks and jet fighters if they can afford it.

@@allthenewsordeath5772 ... that is not the average citizen there is nothing average about being able to own a tank... the average citizen doesn't see the cost of a fighter jet in 10 years of work

@@jakestark2483 People can pull their resources together, that’s the point of a militia.

@@allthenewsordeath5772 i mean you are literally right, citizens owned warships back then.

lol that's not true at all. That's the propaganda that you're told in elementary school. Generation tech is correct that the real purpose of the 2nd amendment was due to the fact that the federal government had no standing military to fend off exterior threats (aka the British and later Spanish)

They still got eaten and beat by a bunch of stuffed bears with sticks and rocks.

@@memyselfandi1300 Those stuffed bears also happened to be the apex predators of the planet.

@@memyselfandi1300 lmfao

@@olafgurke4699 what makes it funny with is I'm not sure if that's a good or bad thing. In another video they did bring up that there was something large that would eat entire villages and that's why they had been so good at attacking the walkers. (And in their trees)

Actually it did quite well for them, we are not a pacifist race of peo0le but if the death star came around we'd die to that is why in a new hope tarkin says fear of this battlestation will keep the population in check. Or shall I remind you of the siege of Mandalore where the empire destroyed a massive warrior race.. no how about the nightsisters of dathomir being destroyed by battle droids.

It was like dropping a nuke on iceland.

Mandalore was a warrior race and they ended up in the same place as Alderaan. It isn't the philosophy of the people, it is their capacity of firepower and their ability to defend from similar violence. Alderaan and Mandalore failed in those aspects and hence the Empire used superior force to wipe them out.

Without realistic physics I imagine they would look something like fighter hets

@@cumunist2120 HETS GO FRUUUMMMM

A solid cube with lots of thrusters and guns.

Hello episode, welcome to another friend of Allen, my name is Generation Tech.

Probably better for the first order. They probably would have focused more on mini planetary detroing lasers, or would have built more ships and would have done a much better job destroying the resistance. Tho I'm sure they would still ruin the sequels

I think it would might be hard for the First Order to go against the New Republic if they weren't vaporized with a surprise since we did seen the New Republic still used X-Wings and there's still some Rangers going on.

I second this.

Don’t know to approach this but I’m sure none of will be able to afford it

It's probably comparable to NYC

you monster! how dare you create evil terrible "ghost sabers"! How will the judicial forces track you down if you commit a crime with it!

Got kicked off SpaceBook for trying to sell a crystal carrier group. Sorry man.

@@iamunamed5800 it says shall not be infringed, registration is infringement on my right to bear lightsabers

Good and evil, moral and immoral are social constructs... The consent of the masses to an ideology. From the perspective of either side in a conflict, the other guy is always the evil one regardless of who is in truth right or wrong.

Bro I was literally out patrolling my neighborhood with my AK and full kit. Armed a few of my friends to roll with me. We took some pot shots at a group of Tifas and they quickly ran the other way. After that I'll never not be armed.

@@marleyjr00 I don't patrol my neighborhood with my AR or AK in full kit. I do however carry a pistol on me at all times and I have my rifles at home ready. What's your point?

Ayyyyy same side, bois. Train hard, train smart. 🤘

@@Excalibur01 I normally don't either but that was one time I did.

@@Excalibur01 see a pistol I support but the nut carrying around an ak 47 is not protecting the neighbourhood but scaring the people just because he has a small dick doesn't mean he needs a big gun

Yup, a ship capable of FTL is infinitely more dangerous than quite a few weapons in fiction.

@@mrbuttocks6772 Issac Arthur's channel mentioned that a few time and I think Templin Institute made a video about the legality of spaceship weapons

I mean, in just about any country ppl can purchase deisel fuel and fertelizer which can be way more destructive than a gun.

@@misterchubbikins Yeh, cuz boom boom. But seriously firearms/blasters are far more 'usable' than explosives, even with little training.

@@mrbuttocks6772 it was a comparison between the accessibility and destruction capability between explosive material and the hyperdrive capable ship.

It's so dumb. You're like a thousand times more likely to be hit by a drunk driver than shot by a legal gun owner, so why are cars and/or alcohol legal in cities?

@@thelordofcringe Maybe because guns are tools literally created to hurt and kill? I dunno, just an idea.

@@olafgurke4699 More than twice as many people are killed with knives than rifles and shotguns combined, but you feel safe having someone owning a pocketknife next door?

@@thelordofcringe Given that knives are tools that have a myriad of other purposes compared to guns, yes.

Ewoks do

Damn straight

Um.... question. Don’t take this the wrong way, but how exactly is it a right?

@@LysimedVenteel A right is something that each one of us has from the moment we entered this world and it isn't something a government entity can take away. Be it by god or simply by existing, a person should not be denied self defense or the means to be able to defend oneself from aggression. You have a right to speak your mind You have a right to believe in whatever god you want to believe in A right to not have your house occupied by an army against your wishes A right to not provide testimony against yourself etc So the long and short of it, the right to bear arms is simply affirming what we all have by simply existing and cannot be taken from us no matter how people try to justify it.

@@LysimedVenteel Essentially, you have a right to have STUFF. YES, they CAN be dangerous but denying, restricting doesn't make it right. If 2 guys have a gun but one decides to kill someone with it and the other saved a life with it, it isn't the gun's fault. Same if they had knives, bats or use their fists. People try to justify taking away guns by saying guns kill a lot of people yet turn away when a man beats a woman to death with a pipe because 1 death from something that ISN'T a gun doesn't matter to them even though EVERY life is precious

@@Excalibur01... Well I mean to be fair it would take you a long time to kill 100 people with a pipe... also I could kill a thousand with a toaster so what's your point??

If the state wants to disarm you to protect you it means that it wants to threaten you without consequences

I dunno, i'm not American but if i'm in a shop and I see someone with an m16 slung on their shoulder or a holster with a gun in it visible for all to see I wouldn't feel that safe. I don't know what the person with the weapon is like, maybe they'll take offense to me dressed a certain way or having pride flags on my jacket. Than again i'm English, only time I see guns being held is by airport security.

@@jack1701e You don't have to be worried about a person who is openly carrying a firearm because only law abiding citizens do that. It's the criminals that hide their guns so you don't know that they have one until it's too late. Like when they're ready to rob you or your store.

... This this is why I come to KZfaq cooking tutorials

As well as the right to defend yourself from alien scum and those evil dolphins.

You can already go to jail for defending yourself in your own home. Many states don’t have stand your ground laws. They force you to retreat in your own home. Criminals have more rights in your home than you do in some states.

@@davidordaz5251 you are probably insane did you know 82 mass shootings were committed by registered gun owners in the usa. That shows you clearly need to have a basic universal registration system. These shootings will not stop with gun regulation they actually have very little to do with guns at all. He'll canada has gun registration we still have shootings. Criminals never change Why a country would even allow automatic ak47 m16s ect is stupid yes the criminals will always have guns. You do not need one tho unless you are living off the land a ,majority of us citizens live in metropolitians or cities. Why should you a probably crazy guy be allowed an ak47 in the ,middle of a city, and the answer of it's my right was written in the 17 or 18 hundreds when we didn't have autos they will not ban double barrell pumps ever you will still have weapons but it's the fact that I can go to a gun store in the states buy a gun commit a mass shooting with a double banana clipped ak 47 is fucked . The reason gun regulation is good is because it ensures at the very least there are more respomsible people with guns. There are always bad apples. Do you see why you sound crazy

@@jakestark2483 A mass shooting is where 3 or more people are shot or killed if you want to get rid of gun violence you would target the inner cities not the people out in the country minding their own business. ALSO fully autos have been banned for the pass 80 years so get your facts straight kid. Your just some privileged kid living in the suburbs that has never had to defend themselves against gang violence, burglaries, and rapes. guns are used defensively 100s of times a day and thousands of times a year my right to bear arms outweights your pussi feeling to "feel" safe even though you arent. Guns are used WAY MORE defensively then offensively and untill you accept that your delusional

@@jakestark2483 Gun control is largely ineffective and really only makes a government get drunk on power before becoming oppressive because there's no armed populace to push-back, also on most firearms purchases there is a background check among other things, if you tax it only the rich can get it if you outright ban it you're empowering a government that may or may not have your best interests at heart. Additionally, the qualification for a massed shooting is pretty loose, it's something like 3 or more killed or injured no matter the severity, and most of that can be chalked up to gang violence additionally most mass shootings are conducted with handguns not rifles, check the details more and less statistics, it's easy to throw numbers around and sound smart, but there's more to it than just numbers. Also 30 rounds is standard capacity for most varmint rifles AR-15, AKM, Mini-14 etc. and 20 is the generally accpeted standard for battle rifles M-14, FAL, G3, etc.

It doesn't.

You said it. Australia and UK gave up their guns and now they are building camps to house their "undesirables"

That didn't age well.

And also a society with mass shootings

@@funveeable who at those undesirables?

@@tomshrosbree1189 even if we banned guns, mass shootings would still take place. Just this time no one would have anything to defend themselves.

I failed to notice said clip, but that is the theme of one of the Sequels to Blood Rayne (either 2 or 3, I do not recall which.) I went back and found what appears to be the clip in question... it may also be 30 days of night, which was not set in the civil war era, but rather in modern alaska, but I still think you are looking for blood rayne

@@mattlewandowski73 My bad; my apologies. The clip is at 7:50.

Boba Fett: Regulate this