Isaiah 48:13 says He stretched out the heavens like a tent. That alone would create distance and thus, time.

''Can You bind the chains of the Pleiades? Or loose the Chords of Orion? Tell me Job since _you know.''_ ~ 38:31 The Pleiades is a bound cluster, and Orion's belt is flying apart! Now HOW would Job KNOW this?? Well now ..he must REALLY HAVE talked to God :D

These videos have made it abundantly clear that we do NOT know as much about dating the earth and fossils as we have been led to believe for decades. Perhaps we do not know as much as we THINK we do about light and space as well.

God isn’t ruled by nature, He rules over the creation.....

I own a cheap telescope and even this instrument reveals some amazing sights. The Living GOD is an Artist w/no equal, not even a close second. I long to see the things The Lord has prepared for those who love HIM. The earth will be filled w/the knowledge of The Lord. When the sons of GOD are revealed the curse placed on creation (because of our sin) will be taken away & we will see awesome things we can't even imagine today. Even so Lord return quickly. Please keep sharing the work you do in revealing "The handy work of GOD". Even now HE has mercy on those who repent and believe on HIM.

“"He stretches out the north over empty space And hangs the earth on nothing.” ‭‭Job‬ ‭26:7‬ ‭

As a kid, I always got in trouble for speaking against the big bang. The idea of it defies the most basic laws of physics. 1) everything should be traveling at the exact same speed 2) since space is a vacuum, solar systems could never be formed because we'd still be hurling through space - there's more reasons but I'll stop for now

God matured creation rapidly. Excellently put makes perfect sense.

For the question in the title, I think the relativity of simultaneity could be the answer. "In physics, the relativity of simultaneity is the concept that distant simultaneity - whether two spatially separated events occur at the same time - is not absolute, but depends on the observer's reference frame."

I was raised to believe in a young earth but as I grew older my love of science and young earth dogma clashed, science won. There is so much about the world that makes no sense in a young earth perspective. Most likely tho this comment will be removed or drowned out by those who claim to love to hear peoples testimonies until it contradicts their beliefs.

I don't know how God created everything but I know he did it no questions asked.

Ah yes, the old "God just did it" explanation. No need for a 20 minute video. It literally could have been a 10 second video. "How can a star be 10 million light years away but we can see its light now if the universe is less than 10 thousand years old? God did it. The end."

Adam and Eve were created as mature humans as was the garden they lived in. It is not hard to believe the universe was created as a mature universe.

With questions about time, I've found it helpful to assume that time was created during Genesis 1:1. We are currently locked in time and cannot comprehend the absence of time.

In the beginning the earth was void and without form. It didn't say the earth was not here. Our beginning isn't the earths beginning and certainly not Gods.

Did not God say in his word that he stretched out the heavens?

In the beginning when God said let there be light he didn't say Let There Be Darkness for 10 million years until the light shows up. There was light immediately.

I listened to this twice. I think these two guys make a great argument that creationism is a foolish thing to believe.

It's the Stars that shine for you, and it's the stars that lie to you.

Time is relative. For example, in Chicago, as I write this, it's about 8am, where as in Waterloo Iowa, it's 1997.

I did not understand how the light from distant stars can be sped up. Even provided that it is a miracle, if the speed of light changes, it affects nearly everything else in our physical framework. Can the Universe even remain stable if the lightspeed begins to change? The miracle of the lightspeed changing requires a large number of other miracles to happen in parallel to make a consistent whole.

Science is base on the stuff we can see and observe. There's alot more to it than than that.

There is another biblical point that is seldom addressed. I have a relative who believes the miracles, specifically of the Old Testament, to be the makings of fairy tales. But if we had the Word of an omnipotent God who did no miraculous signs or wonders, that would seriously put into doubt his omnipotence. We NEED these miracles in order to understand God's power. And if an unbeliever read a bible that had no miraculous signs, he or she would be less inclined to put any trust in that god. In the same way, we need the miracle of starlight to show us just how powerful God is. Starlight, in and of itself, is a miracle---plain and simple---because we shouldn't be able to see it at all except for the sun and some very close stars. I have no problem "bumping into" a miracle when it comes to discussing science because the rules that science has discovered also come from God who is the only one who can either bend or break those rules.

Isaiah 45:12 It is I Who made the earth and created mankind on it. My Own Hands stretched out the heavens. I marshaled their starry hosts. Jeremiah 10:12 But God made the earth by His Power; He founded the world by His Wisdom and stretched out the heavens by His Understanding. Jeremiah 51:15 He made the earth by His Power; He Founded the world by His Wisdom and stretched out the heavens by His Understanding. This makes sense to me, He stretched out the heavens.

Best video I have seen in a long time. I know a mighty GOD.

God can do what God wants to do. We are his children. He bends life and death . You can die but live on again in hell or heaven . That’s power

Creation narrative in Genesis is composed of two strands: one describes the process of creation starting with "Let there be light...", (scientists call this the big bang), accompanying this creation narrative is the second narrative which culminates in Seventh Day Shabbat rest, these two narratives are intertwined together as is melody and rhythm in a piece of music. The repetitive "And it was evening and morning..." is the rhythm section, its purpose is to introduce the 7th day Shabbat, this does not impose earthly 24hr time on the creation narrative. It is unnecessary for Christians to insist on 6 x 24hr creation, but we are to maintain that creation emerges perfectly formed from the moment of its appearance. Fossil evidence confirms that creation appeared perfectly formed, there is no evidence of evolution from so called lower forms, there is adaptation, but there is no species transition. Hebrew word for "day" does not necessarily mean 24 hr earthly time, the meaning allows for very long earthly time, consistent with scientific observation. Crucial point to defend for Christians is that creation is "very good" from the get go, and does not evolve across species boundaries. Regarding nature of Man: Man is the embodied breath of Life, this breath of Life is our mind. Man consists of: physical body, the mind, and language. The physical body is me, the mind is me, the word is me, a triune unity.

That's fine idea, comparing star light appearing to the earth bringing forth plants and animals. Animals simply formed out of the waters and ground as full grown creatures. It certainly was miraculous. The entire creation event was entirely miraculous of God. On the 3rd day the plants before the sun on the 4th day the sun, moon, stars 20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. 24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind So God simply created everything as new but also matured, full grown, as if it took a long time to get there, so why not starlight.

Salt ..... the oceans would be even saltier than the Dead Sea if they were billions of years old.....

Berry Setterfield’s work on light and How it is directly associated with ZPE, explains a lot concerning light. He found Zero point energy as it increases is directly proportional to light actually slowing down. As the universe is being stretched (like a rubber band) generating energy in the form of waves which collide to create matter. When the peak waves move apart they convert back to energy. Think of two waves in the sea colliding and where they intersect forms a crests creating a white cap That becomes visible. As the waves continue on, The wave energy dissipates and the white cap disappears. In a similar manor, In the brief moment of time ZPE waves collide, it becomes a particle and captures the photons acting like a hurdle for the photon slowing it down. This is why matter seems to appear from nowhere Then disappears again. String theory was a result of observing these colliding waves. Their error was that they surmised matter was being drawn from another universe popping in and out of existence From one dimensions to another. “Again secular scientists trying to justify their worldview.” If it is impossible for life to exist because of laws of probability, then if I have an infinite number of universes, my probability improves. In essence, “if I just add more time I can justify evolution”......Anyway, The more hurdles the photon encounters the slower the beam of light. The less tension there is on the fabric of space the lower or the longer the waves. The more tension we put on the fabric like a rubber band increases the potential and shortens the wave intervals, thus the frequency of peak wave collisions increase. We have been taught that The speed of light is a constant, which is provably not true. Light could actually get to the earth instantaneously, it could take five minutes 10 minutes our 1000 years we just don’t know. There are several experiments conducted recently, where it’s has been demonstrated you can stop light dead in its tracks And start the photon up again. They’ve Slowed it down to 35 miles an hour. Light refraction in water also shows that light actually slows down according to the medium is traveling through. These all demonstrate the speed of light is associated or can be affected by the medium it travels through. The Bible even gives us a clue when it says the heavens can be worn out, stretched, torn, folded, etc. Nothing is supposed to be able to travel faster than the speed of light but physics reveals that you can effect one particle on one side of the universe and instantaneously affect others across the universe That can’t happen unless everything is connected for example. If I put a pen mark on a sheet of paper and I put my finger on the other side I move the mark instantaneously as I move my finger and the sheet under it. In a similar way the fabric of space works. As the fabric is stretched it gains more potential energy increasing ZPE. The expectation then is that if the universe is continually expanding or as God puts it “he stretches out the heavens“ is that light in the past would have been instantaneous or exponentially faster than it is today. Another question we need to solve is the red shift. The red shift can no longer be attributed to expansion of the universe. We have now found galaxies where the red shift occurs in the middle of a spiral galaxy. If the red shift is caused by expansion then how can occur in the middle of an organized galaxy. We should observe a galaxy being ripped apart not an orderly spiral as it is observed today. What that would conclude is that the red shift could be caused by something other than a Doppler effect. I would suggest we may be looking at early light wave when the ZPE waves were longer and the universe had less tension. Another good physicists to look into if you want to understand how the universe formed and how it works is David Lapointe’s premier field theory. He demonstrates gravitational forces are the effect of magnetic bowls formed by a Z pinch. This Z pinch focuses energy in the form of plasma and converts it to matter. These magnetic fields created by the resulting “Primer Fields” even affect non-ferrous material. As energy is drawn through a central nul point, (note: Energy radiates out from the null point in two directions known as magnetic poles in waves expanding in ratios seen in Fibonacci sequence, The outer weaker part of these waves are then drawn back in to the center) solid matter and raw energy is drawn toward this flow of energy much like a floating object in a stream is drawn toward the heaviest flow. The only reason we do not get pushed down the stream is because matter has formed around the drain or like hard water builds up minerals which acts like a sifter where only raw energy seeps through. The matter and larger items remain on top as energy in the form of magnetic energy is drawn through the center and expelled through the pipe which runs along its axis. These magnetic bowls “primer fields” generate magnetic fields focus energy to the point it converts to matter but in a stable state unlike the colliding ZPE waves which peak and then dissipate. Unconverted energy continues to flow through a central point where the Z pinch occurred because it can travel through the matter as it is smaller. This current then draws the matter inward toward the center pipe. like an electric current passing through a wire creates what’s called Eddy currents. Which the planets and the moons are caught in. Each planet and moon are Cut in these Eddy currents or Birkeland current along the axial plane formed by the primer field bowls. If you’ve ever seen rapid moving water you might get a sense of this effect. Picture a whirlpool forming because there’s an obstruction. The water is not allowed to pass freely and it creates a whirl pool. Any sticks or debris that are floating around a specific distance can actually be repealed from being sucked into the center. While everything else within the event horizon is drawn inward. Gravitational forces and magnetism are nothing more than the flow of energy. Since flowing plasma has Tendrils or fibers much like muscles they interact with each other. They are called Birkeland currents. As the Z pinch is Forming, The outer filaments are collapsed into planets and moons, as it continues to compress these plasma filaments become so dense that enough energy flows through it to go into arc mode which is what creates nickel, iron and then all the other elements. Our sun is a result of a Z pinch that has happened in the center of multiple filaments that as they compressed formed planets and once it collapses enough went into a arc mode. Because energy flow is sustained the arc is sustained. Again like a drain having too much water poured through it, some will splash out in the form of electrons which then collide with the first thing it hits, creating fusion only at the surface. This is why when we look at the sun spots they are 4000° cooler which means the center of the sun is not the source of fusion as the gravity model would predict. We observe fusion is not being generated from inside but happening at the surface of the sun. Like all energy it will seek equilibrium that’s why an electron accelerates as it moves away from the sun. It’s equalizing potential. The flow direction of the plasma creates the poles and the magnetic fields created by the collapse of the filament not only generate an Eddie current causing the systems to revolve a certain way but it creates an axial plane in which they are trapped in. A spiral galaxy is created when two filaments are traveling in the same direction and they interact with each other. Other formations are created when two filaments collide going in opposite directions. All demonstrated in the lab. Recently they discovered that spiral galaxies centers are spinning at the same rate Is its outer planets. This is an impossibility if gravity is the causal force of planetary formation and galaxy formation. There is no such thing as a graviton or even gravitational force as we know it. It is merely the effect of energy and energy flow. This flow creates frequencies such as radio and light Like the amount of breath forms a note on a flute depending on the whole size and the amount of air passing across it. ............ capacitance resistance and vibration. This same mechanism explains galaxy formation, solar systems all the way down to atoms. What you see then in an electron microscope is a physical representation of the magnetic primer field bowls. A proton and a neutron may be nothing more than magnetic pole opposites. Recent studies have shown Z pinches can be created in water via sound waves. Looks like a star in water. Ironically as hot as the sun. (The sun is a plasmoid). There have been multiple plasma studies that have been able to reproduce every formation we see In galaxy formations. Sapphire project has even created many signs complete with solar flares and pole reversals. What is interesting to think about is that the Bible notes in the end God will simply let go and the earth and the universe will go up in flames with A fervent noise. The sun and stars will go dark. Guess what would happen if you stop the flow of energy?

Its been created that way. There is no way everything came together in the universe then earth and life on earth by accident. Everything has to be exactly the way it is or we never lived

The idea of cramming the Bible’s text into our beliefs is called eisegesis, as opposed to exegesis, which is pulling meaning and understand FROM the text. A simple reading of the text answers the question. God intended that the lights in the heavens were to be for signs and seasons, days and years. Genesis 1:14-19 14 ¶ Then God said, “Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs and seasons, and for days and years; 15 “and let them be for lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth”; and it was so. 16 Then God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. He made the stars also. 17 God set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light on the earth, 18 and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 So the evening and the morning were the fourth day. Obviously He created them in such a manner as to provide visible reference from the earth instantaneously, which, if you are an omnipotent creator, is fairly easy to accomplish, simply by changing the speed of light. The next dilemma is, why did God have to RECREATE the Earth at all. In Genesis 1:2 it states: The Earth HAD BECOME without form, and void. When you look at the actual Hebrew: Inflected: הָיְתָה Root: הָיָהSpeaker Icon Strong's: H1961 Language: Hebrew Code: H Vqp3fs Vqp3fs Word: הָיְתָה Speech: Verb Stem: Qal Type: Perfect (qatal) Person: 3rd Person Gender: Feminine Number: Singular Long: Hebrew Verb: Qal Perfect (qatal) 3rd Person Feminine Singular Which one is a verb, “WAS” or “HAD BECOME”? This is called the “Gap Theory,” and it has merit. It states that there is an undetermined amount of time between the two verses. Either way, this only becomes a problem when you err, and place God inside of the human restraints to understanding box. If He’s truly omnipotent, then this problem evaporates. What is the definition of a “DAY” anyway? By our cosmic understanding, it is the length of time it take for the earth to make a full rotation on its axis. The sun, moon, and stars do not operate on the same “DAY” definition. Maybe he made the stars in one full rotation of THE UNIVERSE, which could be many billions of years. Bottom line, maybe start defending your beliefs based on the omnipotence of the Creator. People who are looking for a scientific explanation of how this may have occurred are ask us to argue from the impossible position of an assumption that we know things that our scientists and astrologers are light years from knowing themselves. This is simply reductio ad absurdum, which is best answered with an absurd answer, aka, God is Omnipotent. Absurd? Yes, but also true.

The speed of light is exponentially slowing due to the increase in zero point energy. Light was moving millions of times faster during creation week. All chemical processes are electrical by nature. Electricity travels at the speed of light, so everything could grow to maturity in a fraction of a second during the first week. Take a look at physicist Barry Setterfield's work on this.

Jargon. The stars are set in the firmament. Question is... How deep is the firmament?

We can see the light from stars because it's always been here. Job 9:8 says God "Stretched out the heavens". This implies the universe was much more dense in the past (secularists would agree). If the universe was much more dense than it is today, the light was at one point already here. For the light to not be here, the expansion of the universe would have had to have been faster than the speed of light. It could have been as fast as the speed of light or faster and we couldn't know the difference.

Well, you didn't mention that a day for God is not a day for us. In fact isn't a day for the Lord compared to a thousand years for us? Also, most of the things you describe as happening defy the laws of physics - conservation of energy, mass, momentum the irreversible process of entropy, the speed of light etc. Your explanation is pure magic - one set of immutable laws to create and a second set of immutable laws to maintain -- this sounds like the irreconcilable differences between the Theory of Relativity and quantum mechanics - they both work well in their sphere but cannot be merged or compared.

"The fool has said in his heart, " There is no God.""

Dark Matter is a plug number to make the math work...

That wine making was such a glorious miracle.

Inflation and general relativity can actually be used to argue for a young universe. Since time is relative, and the deeper you are inside a gravitational well, the slower it passes for you, and since in the early universe everything was close together, causing the most massive gravitational well in all of the universe's history (the singularity from which the universe supposedly expanded from), then from our perspective today, far above in the "average" gravitational well of the universe, looking at the distant past by observing light, it would appear to be much, much older, but just because time was running slower then. Just like if you look at an object falling into a black hole, it will appear to you as if it was moving slower. It means there are some parameters that could be applied to Einstein's field equations, where both statements: "from my frame of reference, the universe appears to be billions of years old" and "from my frame of reference, the universe appears to be a few thousand years old" are simultaneously true. If I still was up to date with my tensor calculus, I would give it a shot at finding these parameters. Something tells me they will be remarkably close to the conditions of the inflationary period.

at some point God went from creating to sustaining Genesis 3

Flawed thinking... "I reject it because I am a biblical creationist"... See, if you place your belief in how a thing works ahead of the evidence collected being allowed to guide your investigation you will learn nothing new, or even accurately. That's not how science works. That's how perpetuating a lie works. Assert a position and then cherry pick/misrepresent data such that it supports your presupposed assertion. We left the dark ages long ago, well, most of us.

I didn't think this one was one of the better episodes personally. He talks about believing uniformity in all cases being a risk but then applies a principle of uniformity to assume that God treated the stars the same way he treated plants, despite saying Creation is where uniformity breaks down...

The classical Newtonian 3D model can explain this if :- (1) The universe began to exist abruptly as an infant universe but already having galaxies and stars which then expands , (2) The Milky Galaxy was at the centre of the universe, and the solar system near it, (3) The first flash of light from any star will reach the earth depending on its position at time zero, (4) There is a visibility horizon such that the star initially at n light years from the earth will have its first flash of starlight reach the earth in n years no matter where they are NOW, but with a red shift which severity depending on the recessionsl velocity of the star. A far-away star may be 100 million light years from the earth NOW, but if it starts its position within the visibilty horizon, its light can still reach the earth but with very great red shift.

Earth is stationary Take readings on moon n sun with sextant .

Amazing how smart people can waste their time.

Outstanding interview. I pray all people that have used old universe astronomy as their stumbling block could watch this video. If you're a Christian share this video with your friend.

Any God who could speak billions of stars into existence would have no problem speaking the light in transit coming from those stars into existence also... The light from stars argument against a young earth fails if God does exist. I never could understand why any of this is even in question.

Isn't it possible that Light travels instantly from its source and takes time to reflect back? Hence the "speed of light" just being the measurement of a light source to and from a measuring system?

Some of the writings in scripture are from the perspective of men , so what you get is from a earth perspective , and not meant to be taken as scientific fact , but is spiritual in its focus.

The flow of time for an object that travels at 0c is 1. And for an object that travels at speed of 1c the flow of time is 0. -> Within a bubble of its own, a photon will travel everywhere in no time.

19:24. In Australia Orion is upside down, which is another proof the Earth is round. It also only appears during our summer before disappearing below the horizon.

My ancestors have been in Australia for at least 60000 years. No flood mentioned in their history .

Of course this can't be definitively proven, but we do know that gravity affects how fast Time progresses and thus the speed of light. The further out of our gravity well that Earth sits in, the "faster Time" progresses. We know that our satellites register Time going faster than for us. I forget the exact difference, but it's like 1 sec on Earth is matched by ~1.0000003 seconds for the satellites. How much faster is Time outside of our solar system? How much faster between the stars? Or outside the galaxies? What if......it only takes a day or so for light to travel from anywhere to anywhere? Just a fun personal theory. ;)

You don't just have a starlight problem, but a matter travel problem with the collision of galaxies and jets proceeding from the cores. I personally think we require a paradigm shift. Isaiah 34:4 says that the host of heaven will be destroyed in an act of falling like leaves and fruit. I believe the solution in solving many mysteries is a new theory of gravity. If you are interested, then I"ve posted a video on that subject along with other concepts that are fueled by seeing design in creation.

How can sound waves propagate through the universe when there is no air there?

"And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth..." Rev. 6:13 The stars are much closer and much smaller than modern "astronomy" shills want us to know. God placed them within the firmament, just above the earth.

God created a fully functioning universe...Just like when he healed the man's arm. It didn't grow from birth, it was a fully functioning arm.

Dr. Faulkner, I think there is no starlight problem if a person believes the Bible. I think the explanation where God says he stretched out the heavens like a curtain explains the starlight problem very simply. On Day four he stretched out the stars like a curtain, and as they were stretching out they left a light trail. The stretching was done in no more than 24 hours, hence the red shift and the apparent superluminal speeds. If the stars were started at varying times throughout the day and positioned at various distances then the red shifts would vary. We are still looking up at some starlight arriving on earth from day four. Since we are looking into the past we have no evidence that the stars are still moving. God gives a simple one-line explanation!

A bigger question you have to account for first is why are there stars anywhere? The bible clearly says we live in a snow globe. Firmament and all!

God can certainly speed up the processes which in natural would take ages. 9:00 Well said Danny, "Science addresses the natural world and miracles are supernatural and you cannot use scientific method to discuss miracles"

Hello, if you are like me - trying to strengthening your faith, don't read the comments, negative comments and false misleading theories from the followers of man 💕 God bless you 🙏🙏❤ -Also, don't read responses this comment get, I have not red them yet but I am sure it is only negativity ❤ Love everyone of you, trust in our lord and saviour Jesus Christ 🙏🙏

The Creation Event is not constrained by our speculations and presuppositions regarding constants; especially Einsteinian mechanistic encumbrances.

The speed of light has been getting slower since we have been able to measure it (even accounting for precision error). Light's speed is not a constant and has been decaying on a log natural scale and was exponentially faster when the universe was created.

These guys start with a conclusion and try to twist reality to fit that conclusion rather than letting reality dictate the conclusion. Obviously that's going to create problems. Thus "miracles" are needed to make reality make sense in their mind.

From the live chat: "P B 'If you make the data fit the theory, then the theory never changes'...yet science IS the one who changes theories, not so with theology. Science loves being wrong about ideas. Not for Christians" Firstly, "science" is not a thing. It doesn't have the power to change. It is a method that exists only in human minds. It is the people who employ the method who change...if they are honest. As to your thesis, I find that the evidence indicates that quite the opposite is true. Secular Scientists are constantly faking data to validate their preconceptions. Piltdown man, peppered moths, Henkle's embryos, falsified weather data... it goes on, and on, and on. Christians have no fear of saying "I don't know." When a Christian Scientist (not the cult) encounters data that conflicts with what God has told us, either directly through His word or in evidence He left in His creation, we know that the error is either in the data or with our understanding of the data, not with God or His creation. Both secular and Christian scientific theories are constantly changing, but the motivations are different. The Christian wishes only to conform his perceptions to the truth. The secularist wishes only for the truth to conform to his perception of it. By the way, secular science has the same problem. Secular science says the universe is 14 billion years old, but 93 billion light years across. Same problem, different scale, and they can't answer the question yet either.

I love this channel but the content for this one is incorrect and irrelevant. Halton Arp showed that cosmic redshift is intrinsic and not Doppler effect. Redshift is therefore meaningless as a measure of distance. Ultimately, cosmic distances are unknown-any related discussions around time/distance are meaningless. If not conversant with Arp’s (stunning) work, any presumptive expert can be ignored.

The question in this video's title contains hidden presupposition that it is impossible to have young Earth in old Universe. Like “one cannot build a new house in an old town”. Why?

God didn't live on Earth. Why would His days last only 24 hours? For all we know, His day was 1000 years long.

I sure could have used that pointer you got while I was in the Military LOL. Mind sharing the make and model? God be glorified for your labors bothers.

We are assuming objects are the source of light. But God created light prior to any stars. He clearly states He stretches the universe after creating it. This includes light. Origins of universe are miracle work of God. Science can explain them only to an extent that beings knowledge of His work and worship of His power, wisdom. Dr Faulkner is absolutely correct.

I wouldn't write of the creation in transit theory just yet. Suppose God were to call out of existence all stars except our sun instantaneously. Could He not then recreate them just as they were a moment later? Of course He could. If He could do this now, He could certainly have done this in the beginning.

What ever happened to the eather?

Im jealous you can use that pointer.

It's fascinating watching people trying to make science fit into their fairy tale.

A good way to phrase the question is, "How are the stars thousands, millions, and billions of years old when they were created just 3 days AFTER the Earth. There was a physicist who became quite well know when he published a solution to that riddle in 1905. His name was Albert Einstein. Also, keep in mind, we are not stardust, as the song says. The Earth was formed three days _before the stars._ Man was formed from the dust of the ground. We are not the remnants of supernovae or anything of the sort. We are here as a special creation of God by His spoken word, by the chronology of the Word of God, about 6,000 years ago. "By the word of the Lord the heavens were made. And all the host of them by the breath of His mouth. He gathers the waters of the sea together as a heap; He lays up the deep in storehouses. Let all the earth fear the Lord; Let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of Him. For He spoke, and it was done; He commanded, and it stood fast. - Psalm 33.6 - 9 (NKJV)

I'm a creationist and a big fan of your channel. However, I have to say that this video was disappointing. Dr. Faulkner is not my favorite creationist scientist. Most of the video was filled with extraneous material that had nothing to do with the topic. In the end, he had not actual explanation except to appeal to the miraculous, which only provokes laughter from the secularists and atheists. There are much better actual explanations for this seemingly thorny issue for creationists. It's a shame that you did not present a video that actually presented some real answers. Very disappointing.

Personally ive always thought of the "6000" years and the "7 days" as loose terms or even miss translated through time. Often times in languages 7 and 70 are very similar words. maybe the "day" in the 7 days was actually a longer unit of time than our current day or maybe "day" was miss understood.

I think Rick Moranis wasn't the only one who shrank the kids.

the answer is found in Psalm 90:4, how our God view time.

A lot of wisdom here, thank you.

🤣🤣🤣 PLUTO! Walt Disney creation, can you not see the silhouette of the dog on the wandering star? Best friends with Werner von Braun.

How did this guy get a PH.D? 🌝

It makes sense if the stars light left us and went out instead of the Stars being out there and then the light coming to us. Why? Because the Bible States clearly that God created the Earth and then the heavens aka the universe. The Bible says many times that he stretched out the heavens. When you stretch out something it's going from your body out. So if God created the Earth and then he stretched out the Stars and the Bible says that God's throne sets above the firmament of the Earth, who's to say that he didn't create the Earth and everything in it and then literally turn his back to the Earth so to speak and stretch out the stars from the earth that way the light has always been here and he cast the stars out into the universe and put them in their place.

Great video! I'm so sorry you struggled with this for years. I heard your same conclusion almost 15 years ago by Dr. Kent Hovind on a VHS tape. You should look him up, alot of what I see creationists struggle with Dr. Hovind has reasonable hypothesis from the 90s to today. Be blessed!

Could be they are close, we've been told the stars are old. I'd love to see some pictures, actually videos of these constellations planets, etc. I think talk is cheap, give me real facts. Videos not drawing. If we're spinning and flying so fast through space, why don't we EVER see new stars, NEVER, the ancients saw these same stars. All he gave theories, guesses. Where are the facts.

Robert H. Stein has a good summary in one of his books on how the belief or lack of in miracles will inevitably decide which direction you turn with the first step of your journey, and ultimately where you will end up. Lutheran Satire has a humorous cartoon on that subject called Conal and Donal meet Richard Dawkins. My favorite line from it is the joke about disproving the existence of Barium by throwing out the few definitive samples of Barium on hand. GOD is real, Toledots are history, Genesis is Real

Distant? How distant? How do you know?

Thanks Danny for completely confusing me.

It’s called the firmament.... stars are in it.... hello

More elegant: geocentrism -> takes away distance implications of "parallax" ill so named -> takes away size implications of main series and a few more -> takes away the distances in light years exceeding Biblical chronology.

Looks to me like we are seeing Old Testament prophecies come true, when raging rivers spring up in middle eastern deserts; and New Testament prophecies, when there are earthquakes all over (seems more than usual) and volcanoes as well, going off. Floods all over Europe, horrific hail storms in July ... loads of wild stuff.

....sure! And by the way, god created man with two legs so that they would conveniently fit trousers.

A ridiculous attempt to try to make astronomy fit into mythology.

There's a GAP theory that can be scripture proved. The gap exists before the changes that made what we currently read and reread with help of theologians. Evidence for the age makes the gap likely. You could say the known souls that were the chosen, were known in the first age.

A day is a unit of time based on the length of time which elapses between the Sun reaching its highest point in the sky two consecutive times. How is it that 4 days passed before the sun was created, if a day cannot exist without the sun?

Finally a scientist with brains and cajones!

Tbh, I don't think you needed 20 minutes to say "it was a miracle"

Just saying god did it isn't an explanation, it has no explanatory powers. This guy offered no explanation other than saying god did it using magic. How do we see stars millions of light years away going supernova??? The star can't explode before it was created.

Here is another thought. God created man. He didn't say child. He created Adam as a full grown man able to take care of himself so yes God created everything to be in mature form immediately