Cool

Nice

Watching you say you know the rules only to be shut down, sometimes before you finish the sentence. 😂

3 days ago wtf. (I know the video was probably unlisted before properly released)

Video: comes out today, Tyler posts a comment on said video 3 days ago.

same here tbh

Ditttooo 🤝

Same

same

I went from starting to watch his puzzle games, playing puzzle games,...now I'm friggin watching and constructing sodoku puzzles. Thanks a lot, Tyler

It feels like a time travel paradox puzzle where you need to fix events in a timeline

I really do want to see that sort of game. Needing to plan through a self-fulfilling puzzle through half experimentation and half hard logic.

good news! its ruleset reminds me alot of the game Patrick's Parabox

puzzles games are only getting crazier and weirder with time so in like a year someone will have something like that done lol

5d chess with tine trave and paralel dimensions is like that(in a way) recommend

I'm so proud that i get the joke

damn I dont get the joke, but i bet once someone says it im gonna feel real stupid :v

@Jaden Dobbs puzzle game from about a year ago. Check it out, good series.

@@cheffbread3708 game called the witness. won't spoil much further though

@@shinymimikyu169 hey, how come you never show up when I want you to?

Which puzzle?

​@@Tiggy227 Honestly the whole bonus puzzle is cool when you figure out the rule, but 20:16 specifically. The 4 puzzles are intertwined circularly (the earlier puzzles depend on the future puzzles, but the future puzzles also depend on the past puzzles so there's no clear start or end) so you really have to consider all of them at once to solve it. It's super satisfying to pull off

@@Bad-Sir Yee (it was sorta a joke bc the level has a ? In the name) but I totally agree. I'm too dumb for that shit and so I watch my man's Tyler do it and make it look easy

ikr

The devs have to care about colorblind people

WRLoMPTI. Hmm, we could do better. Impossibly meta puzzle really expresses some serious educational decisions?

@@TlalocTemporal Thank you.

@@TlalocTemporal I'm "Impressed".

Exactly what I thought as well

5-? was the first time I had to pull out notes to start doing all the logic. Enjoyed it a lot, was a good challenge. Later ones are their own challenge

How It works when It begins and ends? I still don't get it

@@dinamosflams So essentially, the cubes you are seeing represents the level within 5-?. The mini square has a stencil of the way you solved the puzzle room. What is happening is the way you enter the puzzle and complete it has to match the stencil which corresponds to the 5-?-Level you're on. After a while he got to the "Pre-Drawn" stencils. What was happening is that the puzzle that has the 1-cube stencil and the 3-cube stencil means you have to solve THAT puzzle entering at the same spots that those 2 stencils indicate, and end on the same that those 2 stencils indicate. As he was moving forward, he solved Puzzle 1, which had a 1-cube puzzle on it. He started it a circle and ended on a circle. This matched the stencil on the 1-cube. He then did this for puzzle 3. The next puzzle has a 1-cube stencil and a 3-cube stencil. He had to solve puzzle for the same say puzzle 1 and 3 were solved while also solving for the rule. This created going back to remake puzzles, solving the rule in a different enter-exit circle event horizon, so the later puzzles with stencils of previous puzzles would coorespond to the activity within that puzzle... then the next puzzle would need to adhere to the previous puzzle's ruleset, with an even previousy puzzle's stencil. Hope that helps.

@@EighteenCharacters "Puzzle" doesn't sound like an English word anymore after reading that.

What makes it funnier to me is, I think he might have actually had the rule down, but failed to execute it correctly without noticing (and therefore thinking he had the rule wrong).

A lot of World 5 puzzles are just classic puzzles in a minimialist style

why? when yopu have completed the game you should have already figured out the rules.

@@robinlindgren6429 tyler in some of these levels, like the last few of each section and a meta level or two, manages to either get a vague idea that somehow works or cheeses his way through. i guess this feature would provide some closure

@@galvinn I guess, but the way I see it is: the name of the game is both figuratively and literally 'understand', the goal of the game in my opinion isn't to get checkmarks on the level select, it's literally to understand the levels. therefore, if you haven't understood it, then you haven't completed it. so even if you get the checkmark by accident, the appropriate thing to do if you want to 'complete' the game is to go back into the same level and experiment until you understand it. I did that for I think 4 or 5 levels in total that I checkmarked by accident before I understood what the rules were. I figured every one of them out eventually, with the possible exception of one: [blank]-9 is a level where I know how to solve every puzzle in the level (and I know every solution to every puzzle) and I have found a theory of the solution that is consistent with every puzzle in the level, but that theory is not simple to express, so I don't think it's the real rule. but that rule is consistent with all data I have available and I have tried my best to simplify it to the simplest that I can, I have even found different ways of expressing the same rule, but all of them have this weird tinge of arbitraryness to them that makes me unable to shake the feeling that that rule would break if I had more examples of the puzzle. that is my minor purgatory I guess, and such is inductive science; you don't get to know whether you are right. you only get to know whether your theory fits the data. edit: [blank]-8 is very similar to [blank]-9 but the rule I have found for that one is simple and elegant so I believe that is in fact the intended solution.

@@robinlindgren6429 makes sense. i think my view of this game way limited to the very linear progression of this series, and how tyler never goes back to a previous level (with the exception of 4-9, which he still has yet to finish >:( )

Oh no… Imagine the little timmys

(at the beginning)

Edits

*KZfaq Tyler

Direction of coming in and going out need to correspond to the line in the box itself

For one of the meta puzzles (say, Level 2), which dot you begin (say, Left) and which dot you end (say, Down), indicates how it will be used. So if you come across the squares for the corresponding number of dots to the level (Box with 2 Dots), you have to go through it the same way (Left then Down). The first meta puzzles are easier because they build up on each other, but the last ones depend on future puzzles, requiring Tyler to tweak both earlier and later puzzles so they work with each other.