2nd amendment isn't about animal hunting it's about tyrant hunting Making guns illegal would make freedom illegal

Personally, I think being a responsible, law-abiding citizen having a concealed weapon capable of shooting back at a mass murderer about to kill you and the surrounding people around you gives you better chances than being a helpless, unarmed victim.

Because bad guys shouldn't have guns somehow equates to me giving mine up, makes zero sense.

My personal favorite debate with Piers Morgan. I absolutely love how he calmly let Piers spout off all of his talking points and even agreed with them then spun it around on him afterwards.

I voted for him. First independent governor of Minnesota

He made a great point about the car dealership. You can use a car as a weapon.

Jesse is a much better spokesperson for guns rights than Ted Nugent is.

Wussy Piers Morgan shown up by Jesse Ventura. Awesome!

If Jesse Ventura ever changes his mind on running for president, he has my vote 1000%

Like Jesse said, back then if you didnt hunt, you didnt eat. Its not about hunting.

"Facile argument." Ooooh, fancy-pants Queen's English.

Didn’t have myself siding with Jesse Ventura on my bingo card but here we are

I'm so glad Jesse was my governor for a few years

There's a chart on dailymail, a British news source with a chart for major European countries and their violent crime rates per 100,000. The lowest is France at 504 whereas the FBI says America's is less than 500.

i could do more damage with my 30-06 from a perch, than i could ever do up close with an automatic rifle...

"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." Thomas Jefferson

I'd say that was a lot like the Revolutionary War. Freedom-loving American ideals 'put a whoopin'" on the opressive British! Great job, Jesse! I loved it!! 8-)

1:54 it is detective Munch from law and order

"Sight you Britain" Hmm lets have a look at that one, 1988 Britain introduced much tighter gun laws. The result was more murders and more violent crime. They tried again in 1996 and again more violence more crime. Over 20 years of tighter and tighter gun laws and the UK saw more and more violence. Its nor until Britain changed tacked and started targeting gangs directly did Britains violent crime rate start to level out. Britains gun laws failed and to this day are lawed and unjust.

Brother I am a veteran as well. I was the guy manning an M-60 on the Blackhawks. We may have crossed paths. I will be damned this shit is going to happen. We fought too hard and lost too many brothers and sisters. Damn the anti-patriots to hell. They can move to Mexico if they don't like our FREEDOMS here.

Mr. Ventura...you are a personal hero of mine! I wish you we're running for president! Please run in 2024🙏

love the end of this video. *shots back fired

KZfaq is censoring this video. You can look up the exact title on KZfaq and it won't show up.

Jesse Ventura you are the man!!! Thanks for putting Piers in his place!!!

Funny how Morgan immediately changes backs down once the crowd agrees with Jesse

Very well done by Governor Jesse Ventura.

And I'll reiterate what I said: If anything gets back to me as a result of your submitting a complaint that I harassed you or assaulted you and/or KZfaq takes any action, I will make sure that you are held accountable for wrongfully reporting me. I encourage you to read KZfaq's policy about reporting users based on false claims. If any of this gets back to me, then you made the choice for this not to end. Empty threats? I will make sure you face the appropriate consequences.

Every time someone says they believe people have the right to own guns, they go on to tell you why they don’t

loved the ending

Well done! Jesse even turned Piers Morgan's audience against him their at the end. I'd say Piers better get the hell out of dodge before he's tar and feathered by a bunch of revolutionaries.

Piers also needs to understand that there are more than just Americans living in America therefore, there are many non Americans who are responsible for violence.

"when was the last time you heard about someone being mowed down by a machine gun?" When was the last time you read the headline "Would-be Mass murder cancels plans after learning that machine guns have been restricted since 1934, and banned since 1986. Would-be mass murderer decides to go surfing instead" Telling millions of the safest, law abiding, people in America that they need to give up their rights because of the acts of a few evil people is adverse to everything our flag stands for.

PinkFlying Menez, how many "every day" people walk up in full rifle config vests, masks, and body armor possibly, carrying an AR-15 or random other firearm out in a brandishing manner? Again, I infer BRANDISHING as it infers they have the weapon out in a threatening manner. I don't know about you, but I don't walk around out in public with a ski mask, black combat gear, and guns out in the open in my hand. Likewise, with a few seconds you can find numerous videos of people overpowering ARMED GROUPS with a single firearm. Do not forget also that most mass shooters end up killing themselves at the first sign of armed intervention, or they end up dying horrid to the armed intervention. Either way it is a more proven aspect, as you can't name a mass shooting that hasn't ended with a firearm ending the life of the mass shooter, or the mass shooter killing himself after encountering police. There is a pretty distinguishable trait between a good guy and a bad guy with a gun, when you see a guy randomly gunning down everyone around him, versus armed individuals exchanging gun fire with a single person. But hey, I'm sure the ski mask will be a more obvious thing than that. Perhaps he might get the first person attempting to intervene, maybe the second, but the point is if SOMEONE is successful it can reduce the total death that may of happened. And let's be honest, he won't be able to predict WHO has a gun, so it leaves a point he is at that disadvantage, and all it takes is one out of a group to be successful, or even the WHOLE group. You are right, a firearm is a tool capable of lethal implications, its a sad part about the world but crime exists, and at times only LETHAL force is enough to prevent it. It may not be required to even be shot, as again THREAT of death is a very big threat, I'm not willing to barter my life, and more than likely the person attacking you isn't willing to either.

Way to go Ventura!

I never "said the complete opposite" cuz I never implied that more gun laws stops gun violence. My premise is taking away the option of one being able to attain firearms that u can take down an army with and having it more difficult for guns to be accessible. What I DO KNOW is NOT the answer is having more guns out in the streets or having teachers carrying around weapons to stop loons from starting tragedies.

When they limit the number of firearms, they only lessen the number of people killed by firearms, not the number killed. They bring up places like Australia and New Zealand firearms killings. Not the number of other murders.

Second amendment all the way!!!

These videos make me feel great until I realize that the law makers are so disconnected from reality, they will likely pass these insane bans, anyway.

Google "concealed carry never stopped a shooting" and click on the very first link, it should be for a websitecalled "the weekly standard".

I can carry, except for a few places and certain states, in full compliance with the law. My gun isn't particularly heavy or bothersome to carry. I've been carrying over a year now, and not one single person has noticed, or at least visibly reacted to it. I would rather carry this thing around for the next 60 years until I die of old age, and never once "need it" than leave it at home because I don't think I will, and then be wrong.

piers morgan got ownt, jessy is the man, love yah brother, keep up the good work, i would follow you into battle

Great job Jesse we love who you are and what you stand for Amen Jesse thank you

Thank you Jesse

Piers Morgan is the kind of man that, if you're hiking with him in the wilderness, say, you're both looking at the scenary on top of a cliff, you DON'T EVER turn your back on him.

There is a difference to being mentally ill & being a person who is unfit to own & use a firearm. A sense of morality, ones conscience, the value one places on human life, a sense of responsibility. There are many reasons that should stand in the way of owning a firearm, not only mental illness. But a in depth questionnaire could thin a lot of these people out I've grown up with guns & also as a soldier. I don't love them or hate them. And lets not forget, people kill people not guns.

We as Americans must agree with Jesse Ventura it's not about hunting or target shooting it's about our last defense from the police and an oppressive government.

Why do we need to hear great Britain's opinion on American soil

No, it is what's called a typographical error. Fair point though. You're correct on that point. I should have proofread it.

Please explain to me how anyone would be safer by removing any guns.

The Resounding applause for Jesse reassures Me. How Stands the Union. There Stands the Union Mr. Webster.

"...From her beacon-hand glows world-wide welcome..." -Emma Lazarus (The New Colossus, a poem that expresses the statue of liberty) like it or not our nation welcomes foreigners with open arms, this man has the same right as all "Americans" to freedom of speech.

Excellent!

Full auto weapons have been regulated with three different pieces of legislation. The first was the National Firearms Act of 1934, then the Gun Control Act of 1968, and finally the Hughes Amendment in 1986. In essence, what these three laws have done is to say respectfully that fully automatic firearms must be taxed and regulated, cannot be imported from outside the United States, and can no longer manufacture and/or register new/existing full auto weapons with the federal government (BATFE).

Jesse came across much better than Alex Jones in the same argument, that's for sure. It is amazing the difference staying calm and non-hostile can make

What alot of people aren't considering when Piers says the rate of gun murder in Great Britain, Spain, France etc. is roughly 30-50 a year, is that in Great Britain and the other countries mentioned is that the population in 2011 was between 47,190,493 and 65,630,692 depending on the country. In the USA the population in 2011 was 311,591,917. aprox 6 times higher than the other countries. We still have a higher percentage but compared to other killers itss relatively low.....TBC

Jessie Ventura Rules 🔥❤️💥❤️

Actually, he did talk about the size differences, just not in this clip. The proportions of gun deaths to population is still overwhelmingly higher than European countries. If we had the same rate of guns based on proportion, we would have a few hundred gun deaths versus 11K. They just didn't talk about it here.

According to John Lott, since 1950 all but one notable exception of mass shootings occurred in a "gun free zone", and by the way there are over 8.5 million people in the US licensed to carry a gun in public. Not to mention, it wasn't legal for any of these guys to carry a gun to a gun free zone but they did that anyway. That kind of kills the "we should kill concealed carry" argument for me.

I dont call 911... I am 911

I have seen Pierce say that only 35 people die by firearms in the UK. I found this to be a bit understated. On average 50 of 100k people are murdered with firearms and reported as homicides. Still lower than the USA having an average of 300 deaths per 100k but there is an interesting point of information that we are neglecting. Guns are Banned in the UK not the USA, but homicides involving other weapons are almost twice as likely in the UK than in the USA.

Americans will never give up their guns. At least not in the next 100 years. Can't really imagine the circumstances further into the future.

Good point. And why has everybody already forgotten about fast and furious?

Piers asks questions, and then he interrupts those who were going to provide answers.

"Exactly whose side do you think the military will be on in the event of a revolt? The citizens?" The Military is just as fed up, if not more fed up with the government then Civilians are. They're not going to stand for their crap if shit hits the fan. They'll stand with the people of America.

People piss me off.I would rather have a gun and not need it ,than need it and not have it.

Power to the People!

@ 4:03 this is edited to make it look like Jesse gets support from the audience. Watch the full version. The question to the audience about "crackpot points" was not about gun control but about the war on terrorism. FrontSightMovies is obviously anti gun control and have used dodgy and underhand extremes to get support

This is somewhat of a silly argument, since, in order to have a CHL, you have to go through extensive training. Most people aren't going to get one unless they know their gun, go shooting regularly and can use it properly. So I don't imagine there would be a bunch of panicky, inexperienced people running around just firing randomly. Most people aren't going to carry on a gun on them (even though it's their right) but in almost all these cases, if only ONE person did there'd be a better outcome.

Those who oppose the right to own a gun deserve to be without one. It is better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it.

The subject has come up recently, and I think they are considering a change. An ex soldier here had somebody break into his house where he stabbed the intruder and was jailed for it. He ended up getting off any charge, but its ridiculous to have to go through it if one is only protecting their family. Given the rise in shootings & home invasions here, I am now getting my Lic. and a couple of shotguns for home protection / hunting. I have a 2 and 3 year old, its made me think twice.

I'm not paranoid, I'm responsible for my own safety. I live in a decent neighborhood etc and I know its unlikely I would ever be a victim of violent crime...but if I ever become one, I won't be a defenseless one.

Doesn't mean we are not entitled to have them!! You can't fix the problem by punishing the good law abiding citizen!!

Yes, because there is a correlation between vocabulary and basic need to protect oneself.

I AM FROM THE PHILIPPINES THIS IS TRUE!

You’re missing the argument (-.-) Firearms are like an automobile, when used responsibly and in a mature fashion it is not a deadly weapon but in the wrong hands it can be an extremely destructive thing. Just as a car has to be steered in a direction in order to hurt somebody, a firearm must be pointed, loaded, and the trigger pulled in order to hurt somebody. In both instances, it is the person who is responsible for the devastation that results from the abuse of these devices, not the device.

This is not Spain or Germany. This is America! & in America we bare arms!

Jesse is smarter than all other politicians combined

There are two ways to level the playing field: 1) No weapons for anybody 2) Weapons for everyone

Very good

It isn't guns or gun control that prevent murders. I live in San Jose, California which has California's gun laws and only 1.2 murders per 100,000 people. And then you have Compton or LA with close to 10 murders per 100,000 people with the same gun laws. Cities with ghetto's and low income housing will have more crime. San Jose is a very expensive place to live and because of that, you will have less criminals period.

I would also add that Britain is an Island, as is Australia, as is Japan. Its a hell of a lot harder to keep guns out of people's hands when you have a land border. Gun control laws in the US would end up disarming law abiding citizens while criminals got their guns from Mexico.

Accidents happen, there are 50,000 deaths every year in auto accidents, thats almost 1000 a day who die in cars, but nobody died at the meetings on the 19th from gunshots, now some maybe died on the drive home but not at the meetings.

As a british person i can understand where Jesse Ventura is coming from, he does make some valid points. But at the same time i dont think this can be called a debate, Piers Morgan has no special knowledge on the issue. I believe SOME americans should be allowed to carry arms, as according to the ammendment (despite it originally having a different meaning and purpose) but that those that can carry them have background checks and stricter controls placed on who can purchase them to stop murders

We sensible Americans don't want our liberty to be infringed. We sensible Americans know that history, when forgotten, repeats itself. We sensible Americans celebrate our independence from Great Britain once a year. It is a reminder of the not-so-distant past. We sensible Americans still want to see our Constitution and Bill of Rights left intact. What exactly is the problem that we have that we fail to see? What is the root-cause of the problem of which you speak? You don't know. You're blind.

Who said anything about a society that is fearful of one another? We're just saying "prepared." People who take your guns, and have guns themselves, that's a very suspicious. My father and uncle have had guns for years. I'm not scared of them.

He also fails to mention, all the physical attacks, stabbings, violent home invasions, raping going on in Britain. But so long as they don't do it with a gun, it doesn't count as violence right?

And, unless you were talking about a self defense shooting in an extremely crowded place, like say the thanksgiving day parade, or some situaton where the use of self defense may or may not be justified, you don't need a level of training beyond what an average person could get relatively easily to be better off than if he/she were unarmed, and it doesn't take much to learn how not to endanger innocent people.

The car example should be used more often. A car (in the wrong hands) is a 2000 pound death machine.

This video hasn't been hidden at all.

It is reality, real life criminals have stated that they avoided certain stores, knowing that employees were armed. Furthermore, gun shops are loaded with cash, how many gun store roberies are there; and how many are actually succesful? "It's not about who has-----" Who has a gun and who doesn't, directly effects the outcome of these "tragedies". What needs to be done, is give people the ability to defend themselves, not take it away....

1:55 is that Richard Belzer

I can see the owner of this video edited this video. Watch the full version then you'll see.

Atta boy Governor Ventura 🙏👍 you are so right 👍

One of the few if not only points of this interview where I agree with Pierce

they wouldn't even know where it was on a map lol

Also, 2/3 of that 11,000 number that is thrown around are suicides, not murders.

That's like saying owners of cars that can travel at 150 miles an hour will drive at that speed. I have guns but I admit I wish to be rid of them as I have no use for them as I have no desire to harm a living thing and target shooting seems pointless now.

He shut Piers down pretty easy

For the record, i'm not against or for this issue, i'm just sick of the same argument being brought up when it's already in place, you can't put something in place that's already there. So don't get the wrong idea, if it wasn't already in place, I would agree with you.

Piers Morgan does not know what he is talking about; he is literally making a fool of himself. Ventura, on the other hand, is amazing. This is an amazing interview, and Ventura spoke the truth and made me respect him. Tremendously. Unfortunately, he has lost my respect with his recent left-leaning publications, and he is no longer the libertarian and freedom fighter (independent thinker) that he was.