Nope. The point is that he doesn’t pretend to be a journalist (like Sam does)... Joe Rogan is a podcaster. That’s what you dongles don’t understand.

@@DIYTFY are you Joe's alt account? Hey Joe can I go on your podcast? I'm good at talking bs for hours.

@UC8UsRVhw83C6h6ph0b58H8Q I don’t trust Joe Rogan. I’m just saying the people who criticize him don’t do any better. During this pandemic, Sam has been wrong many times about Covid. Neither should be censored or accused of misinformation. Sam should just own his mistakes like Rogan does, but why doesn’t he? Because Sam will lose credibility as a journalist. Joe Rogan is just a podcaster he does not report the news. Sam’s little nut dumpsters will never question him. Every time I watch Rogan or anyone else I always question him and verify his opinions with facts. That’s the difference.

@@DIYTFY LoL that's what daddy Joe Rogan told you and you need to suck up to him.. 😅

@@runrafarunthebestintheworld I don’t even know Joe Rogan. And you don’t know facts.

🤝

@Alabama Man 2.0 Did I say anything about ivermectin here? Or are you just proving the perceived illiteracy of Alabama?

If your name is Joe and your last name ends in 'N', you might be an asshole.

Thing is, Rogan did eat horse paste and the police got more money than ever. So there's that.

Joe took medication prescribed by a doctor. Joe also does not take steroids. (Sam’s cult spreads lies consistently) 👆

He isnt even interesting to listen. And his voice is annoying too.

Deserved? Nah.

That's the real reason he moved to TX... the tax liability.

@Michael C -- did it ever occur to you that it might not be the world, rather it might be you who is mad. 😂

@@czos9239 naw, his home in CA was in the middle of the woods and was at risk of burning down and costing him a ton of money. He used to bring up the fires frequently when his home was in immediate danger now not so much.

🙌🙌🙌🤭👍 tweet that! It's true🤣

Only b/c so many people will take his word too seriously. Honestly everyone should watch JRE under the assumption the guest knows more than him, and that's sort of the point of the show. Describing his comments as disinformation would be giving him way too much credence. Everyone has their own responsibility to be critical of any given media source. Also since when did we take Rolling Stone seriously about anything lol. Information that discourages vaccination should simply be weighed against all other information that encourages it.

Rolling Stone lies all the time. That is a fact.

@@DIYTFY Beat me to it. Citing anything rolling stone has said is pretty hilarious.

@@DIYTFY i don't. rogan is a menace to public health. KEvron

Young people, no but children, no but teenage boys, no but 15 year old boys, no but 15 year old boys in Austin, no but my friend's boss's cousin's girlfriend's ex's 15 year old stepson Bobby, is the issue.

“I’m sure I’ll stumble again in the future, but I honestly do my best to get things correct.” -Joe Rogan, admits he was wrong. 200 million views a month ensue. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@DIYTFY Saying "I was wrong" and then continuing to make the same cases going forward, continuing to push the exact same narrative, does not undo the harm he has caused. The fact that he has 200 million views a month isn't a good thing when he's spreading misinformation. It means people are continuing to consume misinformation, and their lives will be negatively impacted by that. 200 million views is representative of the influence he has and the *responsibility* he has, and Joe Rogan continues to shirk his responsibility. Apologies mean nothing without corrective action. And saying "I do my best, really" isn't even an apology.

@@DIYTFY With your logic McDonalds makes the best burgers because they sell the most. Derp confirmed.

@@rve420 Despacito has 7 billion views because its the best song ever. Derp.

I am pretty sure that Candace Owens was making a big deal over the web address of the sources. She said stuff like "Well that's a '.com' and not a '.org' or '.gov'" and then when they found a '.org' she added another arbitrary qualifier that everyone knew was total bullshit

Rogan gets 200 million downloads a month. You get zero.

@@DIYTFY wrong

@@andrewgrove1691 How?

@@DIYTFY IM DIYTFY AND I HAVE ENOUGH FREE TIME ON MY HANDS TO BE AN INTERNET WARRIOR ON CONTENT I HATE. I LEFT 198 COMMENTS ON THAT LIBTARD SEDER CHANNEL. HAHA

@@DIYTFY Dr. Anthony Fauci served 7 presidents as Chief Medical Advisor of the White House and head of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Joe "Ivermectin" Rogan served 0.

Boys are children. You just played yourself. Goodbye.

yeah…children . male human children. 12.75 year old boys.

@@DIYTFY Those were quoted from the actual video. You should watch it, since you love Rogan so much you leave comments attacking others. BTW, your language reveals your incel status to the world. Good luck with that.

You should read that article. I'm assuming seder did and I give him credit enough to be smart enough to realize that he is spreading disinformation while trying to own Rogan for spreading disinformation. Look at the sampling error created by the methodology of the study.

@@scottw9267 What study Scott? I give you credit for lying while accusing Seder of lying. They're talking about him moving goalposts during his conversation with his guest, not this study strawman you're clumsily propping up in the corner there.

Because in media it is all about the vibes. Even politics are the same. Bush beat Al Gore because people could see them self having a drink with Bush not stiff Gore. Trump is fun unlike robotic Hillary. Rogan earns more than top 20 earning pundits combined on TV. So, it is not an accident.

you think he talks in no good faith because of what evidence again? You say malice vs ignorance why again?

people are stupid and lazy and joe is entertaining to them

It’s easy to take and make money from suckers, and the world is full of suckers

I think.joe togan isn't used to people telling him what to do, California lock downs broke his brain, I don't think it's malicious

Well it's not true. The garbage "study" that guy quoted compares myocarditis cases in young people hospitalized with Covid with myocarditis cases in recently vaccinated young people. That's bullshit. The vast, vast majority of young people who get COVID don' end up in the hospital. You have a lower chance of developing myocarditis if you get COVID and are young that if you take the vaccine. Truth be told both are exceedingly small but the statement the "expert" made is wrong.

there are also now some pretty thorough reports that show the vaccine is more effective than natural immunity so joe is being revealed to be dumber and dumber every day and i'm here for it

I like Toe Rogan, that's a good one.

@@sardoniclaugh9646 Quick look at the actual study shows that you are wrong. They looked at people who had sought health care for myocarditis and then looked if those where vaccinated, not vaccinated or was positive for covid-19.

@@josemengelez6947 Like the "Regaine" brand?

He saves them for when it's important. I do really like that aspect where swearing is totally fine, but the hosts at least try to avoid it. Helps give weighty topics more weight.

My virgin ears!

Yea, hoping it's just him be extremely passionate over the topic and not also having lost someone to Covid

@@GanguroKonata What is with the low quality of poop posting going on here... The road to hell is paved with good intentions, who cares *why* someone is passionate about covid except a low resolution troll.

@@omnibus5359 huh?

Where's his birth certificate???

Quality 👌🏾

False.

@@DIYTFY got anything other than “Neener neener… NUH uH!”

This needs a meme

It was probably when he moved to Texas. From what I heard when the show was done in California he had a bunch of people to Fact check him.

Kinda like Seder in this video thinking that this article is a dunk on Rogan even though the hole in the sampling error created by the methodology itself has been torn to shreds. It takes a special moron to think that there is a conclusion to be drawn from comparing a sample of people that sought medical treatment vs a sample of people that didn't.

@@scottw9267 Unfortunately the cement that is the data and science behind this pandemic won’t be dry for many many years. For now it is best to turn to the specialized medical community who is most capable of understanding the risks and the steps we should take to combat the pandemic. Seder is using their comments and suggestions as the best solution we know of today. When you are actively supporting a hesitancy to their suggestions, it requires you to have the sound data to back it up which no one has, especially not Rogan. If there was data to support his hesitancy, the worlds medical community would come out and say it…

@@sambalaskas5082 but they have. Seder is attacking the data that he is getting as some "nut jobs". Links get deleted on KZfaq but Google Risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection from nature. In the meantime (and to your point) other countries are stopping the use of moderna for men under 30 for thr very reason that rogan is being accused of misinformation. Speculation, but I'm fairly confident it is also why moderna has been unable to get official fda approval even though pfizer got it months ago and moderna still can't get a pediatric vaccine authorized for emergency use. Also again to your point, the WHO has come out and said healthy children should not get boosters but our local health officials are saying that they should based on absolutely ZERO data as presented in pfizers own trials. I am triple vaxxed. I think it was the right thing to do despite developing tittinus from my booster. My kids, it seems pretty overwhelming that it's not the right thing for them based on how well they did when they got covid. Also, to be clear, seder is amplifying a piece of disinformation, your characterization of what he is doing herr is wrong. Maybe you want to call it misinformation for the sake of anti misinformation, but it is still disinformation. He isn't using the comments of experts to make his point... he's taking a study that (assuming he read it) he knows is flawed but is regurgitating it to his gullible audience to "dunk" on rogan for clicks.

@@scottw9267 zero evidence seems not accurate when we are literally looking at studies, they may not be perfect to your note but still it’s what we have. It seems strange that local health officials are using something they have “zero evidence of” if there is literally evidence out there that 60 per million get it for men under 30. Also, are they forcing young men to get the Moderna booster??? I am certain they are just advising to get the vaccine and it’s up to you and your doctor to determine which one… don’t really see how this is a problem of your local health officials. Using your logic, pfizer passed through the FDA so it seems like it is probably ok for whatever they suggested and even if you don’t want to get your child vaccinated there are no mandates for children under 18 that I know of. if you want to argue the nuance of under 18 year old men getting the Moderna vaccine/booster, that is one thing. You can recommend that young men get the other one. I don’t think if you pressed Seder or health officials they would be forcing you to take the Moderna only. The bigger issue with Rogan and others is when you use that to provide a much larger vaccine hesitancy amongst everyone. Using “under 18 young men” and “myocarditis” as a monolith for a much large antivaxx sentiment is a problem.

Yeah it's almost like him an Krystal are backed into a corner yet everyone knows who Joe Rogan is and that includes the media.

I think he already does , but he does it in a indirect way.

Kyle and Breaking Points covered this exact thing a week ago.

Kyle was wrong on the Novax story as well. And he won't ever give Biden a break

I like all MR but seems that they complain about others more that solutions for what they believe in

If that is true, so is Sam. But Sam is just not a very good grifter because all of the money he got from msnbc didn’t get him more viewers. Rogan is a “shill”? Wrong again. He got 50 million from Spotify. He’s 100% independent and gets paid to shill for no one. That’s what scares these Karens. Now go get your facts straight. 👍

@@DIYTFY HES ESPECIALLY NO SHILL FOR SCIENCE. FIERCELY INDEPENDENT HGH JOE

@@DIYTFY lol

@@DIYTFY hi Aron, gotta comment on everything

For the 30 of you that have liked my comment it was a social experiment to see how many idiots will instantly like a comment that says -insert name: And Use KEY WORDS "SHILL" and "GRIFTER" you are not smart or well informed you just see buzz words and instantly assume they are right/make sense. If you liked my comment I hope it makes you realise you just like things you think everyone on this channel agrees with, you lack critical thinking. My comment is one of the most liked after this video has been posted for 40 minutes because all you idiots saw the words "Shill" and "Grifter" it's embarrassing

He's a liberal. These two are friends. He's had him on the podcasts four times. This kind of on air fact check happens multiple times per episode. He's had 1800 episodes. 3 hours long each. That's what Jamie is there for. CNN and all these youtubers are losing their minds over this bit. It's crazy how little research they do. I expect better from Sam. CNN I understand. But no Sam.

It turns out Rogan was indeed correct on the statement that this entire video just talked about

This is over 2 years old but, hello? No he wasn't correct, why do you people have a hard on for misinformation@@danemania001

Typical leftist. Lost lost lost when presented with reality.

@Alabama Man 2.0 I didn't know Alabummer got internet yet, wow you guys are really progressing in this world.

Joe Rogan backed Bernie Sanders in the primary and confront the ignorance and misinformation of Candace Owens on climate change on his podcast. Comparing him with Manchin, when most elected democrats are closer to Machin than Rogan seems a bit dishonest or ignorant...

@@Tomy-im8zl I've got some news, Sherlock: in capitalist society, you are whatever you can buy.

@@aheroictaxidriver3180 this has nothing or little to do with our comments

@@Tomy-im8zl It has everything to do with it. You are simply in denial that only money matters in this society.

Which is exactly what liberals do. It's almost like it's just a human thing

@Gary Jones Yet another fake troll account created just 9 months ago to try to elicit responses and cause division

@@seanpatrick1243 Look man you were the one causing division. Half the viewers of Sam's show want conservatives dead this is like division central. Plus you got my name wrong

@Gary Jones What a ridiculously hyperbolic statement from a fake troll account. No one wants Republicans dead. Just the Republican Party which has become anti-Democratic. There is no saving the GOP. Old school Conservatives should start a new party.

The same goes for any religion or cult. Anyone who says don’t make me prove I am right, prove instead that I am wrong is instantly impossible ti debate with.

sorely missed by everyone. Sam really doesn't have what Mike had.

@@growthisfreedomunitedearth7584 Mr Brooks and Sam are two sides of the same coin. Michael was so damn quick man....I had just barely started watching when he passed....

​@@jessehenderson2967 No they are not. stop disrespecting people who cant defend themselves anymore by change their lives history and meaning

@@jessehenderson2967 two sides, but I personally enjoyed Mr. Brooks better.

@Trip Vic Is that something he’d want to defend himself from? Didn’t seem disrespectful to me…

Dennis Prager said...

That’s exactly what my boomer uncle says 😅

As a lifelong atheist, it's sadly all too common to see that folks seem to get satisfied with getting exactly one thing right and proceed to not then interrogate their other preconceived notions. I started with atheism so I had to get over my extremely conservative upbringing, and luckily that process seems to have lead me to be much more self-reflective. It probably also doesn't hurt that I am nearly obsessed with being correct or at least having justifiable beliefs, and the easiest way to do that is to listen to experts and all that. I hate realizing I'm wrong with a burning passion, far more than admitting it.

@@LiarJudas666 at least you're reflective enough to see that and admit as much. That takes maturity. Keep doing what you're doing dude.

It could have something to do with people calling this a ‘vaccine’ when it’s very clearly an experimental medical device. They had to change the definition of ‘vaccine’ to make this experimental medical device fit, so that big pharma, government, and mainstream media and medical field do not have to call it an experimental medical device every time it’s referred to, which doesn’t convey “safe and effective”. Joe Rogan is doing something great with his platform. Getting folks to start questioning reasoning/motives. We are being inundated with propaganda right now. People who don’t want to take part in these jab trials, let them be. Love your own life and make the choice that’s best for you, and let others do the same for themselves. Stay sovereign.

intellectual pitfall of being skeptical is becoming skeptical of everything and thinking yourself clever

@@RoninDave I mean, being skeptical of everything is technically fine, I think. I think what a lot of people fail to realize is that skepticism ends with a preponderance of evidence. It's irrational to continue questioning a subject after it's been settled. Like yes, question everything. Good. But you gotta follow that up with accepting the answers or you're gonna lose touch with reality, like good ol Earth Worth above your comment.

Yeah.. in the beginning the podcast was quite enjoyable (though i missed the very early beginning). To me it was interesting to have like a 3-hour talk with oliver stone, kelly slater, louis theroux,.. it seemed like an evolved howard sternshow. Then eventually it became obvious how dumb he was, how the whole show was sliding towards alexjones territory and how he deliberately mishandled information, like the subject of ufo’s, while at the same time getting enrolled with the idw-losers, pretending to be hyperrational factbased superbeings to their impressionable audience. At this moment the show is all about keeping murica stupid. MR should be proud of having been shunned from that show.

translation he doesnt agree with u 100% so he should be de-platformed, censored or should have a smaller audience. all that because u have a very small self esteem 🤣🤣🤣

@ Eric Ocasio -- you sound like a triggered lib. Joe Rogan is cool and very interesting, that's why millions of people watching his hours long interviews.

@G JT Even when I still watched him from time to time, I was kind of floored by how much he talked about his comedy career considering he was extremely mediocre at his peak. Did he really think he was an equal to people like Burr?

@@tripvic7629 Nah, he just sucks. I don't want him to be deplatformed. Watching comedians bomb completely is some of the funniest shit; I don't want to be deprived of that.

And as soon as the study proves him wrong, he attacks the legitimacy of the study. All while holding up anecdotal claims he got from his elk-hunting buddies as scientific evidence.

“I’m sure I’ll stumble again in the future, but I honestly do my best to get things correct.” -Joe Rogan, podcaster Retains his credibility, 200 million views per month. You lose.

@@PatrickPierceBateman I also like the way Sam accuses Joe of not reading his referenced article, then totally ignores the main point of the New York Times article he himself references. "Heart problem more common after Covid-19 Than vaccination, study finds, did not assess the risks specifically for youg males, who are most likely to develop the rare side effect." LOL

And it turns out in the end Rogan was right!

“I’m sure I’ll stumble again in the future, but I honestly do my best to get things correct.” -Joe Rogan, no BS apology

@@DIYTFY It's hilarious to see you deepthroating Rogan throughout a myriad of comments and Rogan vids

Credible sources are being censored since the beginning of the plandemic,maybe you still living under a rock

The satisfaction that the Joe Rogan show brings is the fact that he’s ok with being corrected and he’s ok with correcting others. As can be stated for the majority of his guests. A mainstream journalist with pom poms under his desk would have changed the subject or have simply moved on before rolling the dice on exposing their team.

The credible sources have been discredited themselves.

Yeah,… How can Rogan’s head get any bigger!. Just a narcissist meathead

how did he get nerfed? what happened?

The satisfaction that the Joe Rogan show brings is the fact that he’s ok with being corrected and he’s ok with correcting others. As can be stated for the majority of his guests. A mainstream journalist with pom poms under his desk would have changed the subject or have simply moved on before rolling the dice on exposing their team.

@@kingmacio5176 😂

@@otmanh ahhhh, a laughing emoji. Quite an insightful response. It reminds me of how mainstream media deals with disagreeing perspectives. Who needs genuine dialogue, right?

Conservative thinking in a nutshell. Start with a conclusion, cherry-pick information that supports that conclusion while ignoring evidence that contradicts it. Then if you get proven wrong, just move the goalposts, deny reality, or come up with a conspiracy theory to explain why you're still right.

but if you say something stupid really slowly and with enough smug misplaced confidence, they will never know

Jamie Peck was exactly right. Joe's a "lint roller" of ideas. He just picks up random shit and runs with it.

And then he has to search far and wide for a BS source that agrees with his pre conceptions. Very telling..

Yep, it’s almost as if the human body and viruses are really really complex. Maybe someone should dedicate their life to going through the information in and summing it up normal people. I vote we should call them doctors!! Rogan needs to stick to topics that don’t result in death.

I'm pretty sure she was being facetious. But you're correct, and point taken.

She was kidding

It was a joke

haha, well you don't need to be. I believe in you. cut out the simple carbs and you will see changes.

The only dude I know who owns and regularly wears his XXXL JRE shirt is the greasiest, grossest guy I know

True

and he always bombs on Tony's show lmao

You called him Rogaine! I'm stealing that one lmao

You're just not as healthy as Joe Rogan You need to take HGH & DMT regularly & only eat meat to get on that level of fitness Joe's body is his temple

Your anecdotal evidence is not backed by science. Therefore you are anti-science. Goodbye, Danny. 🤥

@@DIYTFY Consider this science: EVERY person who has ever drank water or breathed air has DIED. 100% fatality rate. I recommend you avoid both!

Did your health professionals tell you that the vaccine is what stopped your heart palpitations?! If so how is this not being shown all over the news!?!?

@@nerdslinger1782 My cardiologist said it was a theory. Not enough cases to make a determination. It could have just been timing, since these symptoms tend to go away after 1-12 months from other conditions. I caught it in 2020 at work, so we didn't know nearly as much then as now. But, she said there was evidence of Long COV symptoms going away post-vaxx, so that was her best guess.

I have a degree in pharmacy, and had some training in medicine. However, I still have trouble reading research papers. It takes me very long, and my attention and patience often run out before I can determine if the piece is relevant for a dissertation or project. I was diagnosed with phonic dyslexia, which could be partly contributing to the problem. Do you have any strategies for this?

@@berniethekiwidragon4382 I’m just first year but from what I learned so far I realized research papers almost always follow the same structure. There is an introduction and then several chapters going in depth on the main subjects followed by some kind of conclusion. The introduction is the most important if you want to scan the document for relevancy because it should include everything. Other ways to make it more comprehensible is printing out the paper so you can make highlights, cut out parts, add notes, sort them etc. You can also do all that digitally but for me personally I find it far easier to sort and organize if I have it in physical form. But the most important thing is having a concrete subject that will result in actual research. If your subject is too broad you’ll never finish reading papers. It is very hard to just come up with that on your own. It is far easier to let yourself be led by the literature. For instance sometimes papers can’t reach a conclusion on something, or they have a disagreement with a different study, or they find a new problem/situation. Often times when you read literature you find new things that point you in new directions and those are the kind of trails that lead you to specific subjects. As an example my study is about the extent to which “Are You Sphongled?” by Shpongle can be considered sacred music. I didn’t come up with that on my own. My first subject was psychedelic music but that is too vague, that includes over half a century of music from dozens of genres, to just historically write about that would take 10 years to do properly. So I narrowed my search to psychedelic music from 90’s/00. Then I started reading a lot about Goa-trance so I searched for that. Then I found a lot of papers describing the culture and several times I noticed they described that there was a particular sacred aspect to the culture and experience of the music. I find that pretty remarkable as I had never considered that so I started searching for the sacred aspects of goa trance and actually found two bundles both like 300 pages papers on the sacred aspects of Goa-trance and rave culture. I know Shpongle’s artists were gigantic figureheads of Goa and Psytrance and since “Are You Shpongled?” was one of the first major psy-trance projects that was downtempo, not made for the dancefloor but for the livingroom, I think I can make a decent case for it having aspects of sacred music. I just have 4 weeks for this paper so I am doing a tiny bit of research, just trying to somewhat objectively define some aspects of a music album.

@@LesterBrunt That's very helpful. Thank you.

I shudder to imagine.

Yes, listening to a long-form podcast often showcasing opposing viewpoints is "witless." Meanwhile, you've determined MR reacting to Rogan and Jimmy Dore videos every day is the intellectual cornerstone of youtube 😂

@@addyplatebody I also listen to Rogan. My point was imagine being one of those who only listens to Rogan or Dore, and has never heard MR or the like...it would suggest a very blinkered worldview. A combination of all would be infinitely preferable. it's scary to think some only listen exclusively to Bro-gan, who seems to absorb his opinions from the last person he interview. And his brain cells have clearly been depleted from all the acrid herbal essence enveloping him. Having said that he did gloriously out-smart that criminally doltish air-head Dave Rubin AND Candace Owens on building regulations and climate change respectively. I've always given him props for that (you should follow my comments more closely before judging);

Yet we watch jabbed athletes collapsing with ever increasing frequency... Look at the Australian tennis open...

@KelliAnn Winkler It's just common sense. A virus will cause more harm than a drug created for medicinal purposes. This is definitely an Occam's Razor situation.

@KelliAnn Winkler Natural immunity is not what we were talking about. Kids get vaccinated for a ton of things. Why does your type exist in fantasyland? Just get the jab, and see how it's no big deal, and maybe you'll save a life. Or scream into the void. idgaf.

@@justinjoyit13sorry dude.. i don’t think anything logical or any facts are allowed in these comments.

Aged like milk.

Hi bot number 3517, who is your owner, and what is their agenda?

@@TheEsseboy Hi propaganda spam bot. Answer the question. What is the Covid-related mortality for non-elderly persons with no comorbidities??

@@TheEsseboy Fool

@@TheEsseboy Why do think everyone is a bot that has logical questions? Is it so hard to believe that you don't know everything and there are legit concerns about the. Vaccine? Trump should be your hero for getting the vaccine out so quickly.

I'm sure her heart leapt. Just a beat.

@@berniethekiwidragon4382 I’m also now noticing that Emma has a similar response but it’s more subtle. Pay attention to her eyebrows. She’s like “wow, Sam’s pissed.” :) I’m here for it.

Yep, once the metrics came through for the Tim Pools and Ben Shapiro appearences he won a 9 figure contract to replicate those numbers. Now his brain is just a bunch of right wing conspiratorial talking points rolling in a tumble dryer.

@@noodleseverynight5624 That’s why he has liberals, gays, trans and Dr. Sanjay Gupta on. Super RW. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@DIYTFY He has a far less balanced guest slate than he used to. You can't see it, but you can't see much of anything else either.

Neither do you. 👍

Aged like milk

“I’m sure I’ll stumble again in the future, but I honestly do my best to get things correct.” -Joe Rogan, confused as everyone else.

i mean, he gets paid by power, so why would he speak truth? the only time he wasn't was when he was just starting, and maybe no even then.

Sam is a grifter and a nobody.

I'm sure you are aware that the study was torn to shreds by people because it pulled its population of covid infections from people that needed to seek treatment. Controlled studies have shown a 50% higher risk by the time you get to the booster. (Pfizer of course... moderna is being prohibited in other parts of the world for men under 30)

@@scottw9267 what is this Mickey Mouse bullshit i see before my very eyes

@@scottw9267 Could you tell us which controlled studies please ?

@@discoviolenza1984 For one, Maria Patrone is a epidemiologist that has performed a number of controlled studies on the issue.

@@andrewbrady6154 Maria Patrone has done some good studies.

“I’m sure I’ll stumble again in the future, but I honestly do my best to get things correct.” -Joe Rogan, a person not worried about a “narrative”.

@@DIYTFY He needs to try harder because 10 second search debunked his own stances.

@@rve420 You are correct about him being debunked. But then again, he’s not a journalist. He’s not a news source. He’s a comedian and podcaster. He doesn’t have to “try harder” at knowing anything, that’s why he has experts on.

@@DIYTFY You learned from the best how to move a goalpost and completely miss the point God bless 🇺🇸

@@DIYTFY “Hey Joe Rogan here I’m “just a comedian” so this isn’t really serious. I’m just going to tell you my medical advice based on some (really bad) googling. Don’t take it seriously, after all I’m an idiot, but here is my sincere advice about how you should have endless vaccine skepticism.” - Ep 43 of “My Issues with Vaccines and Joe Biden: The Comedy/MMA podcast”

Joe Rogan is proof you can lead a man to psychedelics but you can't make him think.

Because young Jamie shall never overshadow his mentor, the person that probably pays him very well. He is the JRE yes,,, but maybe man.

I trust Jamie more than anyone, as he does bring up articles that disagree with Joe often. It's just that Joe is rather arrogant.

Because Jamie simply wants to keep his job, I would imagine he is paid pretty well for one of the easiest jobs in the world. I would lie my ass off for that Job.

Yeah Joe ain't gonna take Jamie cucking him repeatedly on air, he knows that.

Tragically so…

I'll take a moment to comment how stupid this line is. It was a transparently bad line so they wouldn't have to devote anything substantial to Harvey's arc

@@AlphaCentCom I’ll take a moment to lyk how dull you are. I’ll also take a moment to tell you it’s a joke. Let that sink in for a moment.

He’s either gonna double down or avoid the subject entirely from now on

Your stats are made up fantasy fiction.

@@DIYTFY No no, most fans of Slow Brogan are very dumb, so his imaginary statistics are correct

The rate of myocarditis is high enough to be considered a real safety signal. We hope that there aren't long term complications from these myocarditis cases, but we don't know for sure. Why are you just dismissing this side effect? Boosters, for example, might not have the same benefit profile for that age group as the first two shots. It is a discussion that needs to continue.

@@benjaminchiarolanza3493 The rate is still lower than getting it from covid itself. I do agree that children probably don't need more than 2 shots though

Not serious? You must have been absent the day they were handing out brains.

Rand Paul agrees with him.

My condolences to you and your family. Stay strong friend.🙏🏻

I'm sorry for your loss. I lost my mom at the beginning of all this. I hope you have a lot of happy memories with her that you can recall and share with others.

You should see what the battle against Missus information is like! Just kidding. Seriously though. My condolences. You must miss her greatly. You’re right; the battle against misinformation is important. I wish you well.

From websites selling unvaccinated sperm.

No. They don’t. This is what they are talking about… finding something, anything to confirm your bias 😂

He was way less Fight Club than Joe and his listeners were hoping for.

I stopped watching when he had the leader of proud boys Gavin Mcinnes on and both were defending trumps "they're rapists" line by bringing up the fact that it is so difficult to get pass the border that immigrants will often get raped by people taking advantage of them at the border . Their takeaway from that was there you go some are rapists never mentioning the reason this was happening and also nevermind the fact that the people doing the raping are not the ones illegally immigrating . It made me sick to my stomach , but Joe will defend himself now by saying "we didn't know what proud boys was back then " . Gavin was blatantly racist and spouting bullshit like this the whole podcast and you didn't realize what he was about Joe?

Shows like his are all built around conformation bias.

Sam’s show is built around confirmation bias. Correct. 👌

Lol the archaeologist episodes were the only ones I’ve watched

Couldn’t agree more. It’s hard to watch/listen to now.

Oof. He was right.

Sadly that's what most people do.

And choose to take steroids that have far more side effects.

What is the Covid-related mortality for non-elderly persons with no comorbidities?

False.

@@DIYTFY false

He's been proved right more times most clueless people on here.

@@kasimshaikh3750 don't simp for Rogan buddy, take a break from the JRE world for a bit then have another look, best of luck man 👍.

@@fellsy584 What!!! I'm just stating facts these guys are bullshitting.

You could easily do to him what Ben Gleib did to Charlie Kirk, lead him down a rabbit hole, and show just how uncritical they are.

I think the operative word in that headline was "study". A singular study isn't very useful. I'm a layman so I'll try not to overstep my bounds, but if 20 studies suggest a link or a trend, I'll probably go ahead and assume that there's a decent correlation. If one study suggests something, that's an interesting idea that should be researched more.

@@LiarJudas666 well 1 study isn’t as good as 20 studies for sure lol but a study is a study. I posted this comment because of the way Sam went “SUGGESTS!” Even if there were 100 studies on the topic, no self respecting scientist would say this “proves” or “verifies” something. Unless we are discussing literal laws of nature, like the laws of thermodynamics or Newton’s first law of motion, do we ever use any word other than suggests. The reason science is so great is that it leaves room for discussion and correction :)

@@ds8249 are u trying to defend Rogan?

@@ds8249 because this video literally proves that heart problems are more common after Covid infection.

@@LiarJudas666 I think you’re illiterate or really scientifically uninformed. Nothing I said can remotely be interpreted as a defense of Rogan. It’s just facts. This is the language scientists use. The word suggests is of no significance.

Vaers is a legitimate source linked from the CDC website. You lose. 👍

He let Dr. Sanjay Gupta speak publicly longer than he has ever in his career: 3 hours. Dr. Malone is a scientist that invented MRNA tech. He also got 3 hours. You shouldn’t be commenting if you don’t know this.

@@DIYTFY Um. Huh? Are you an anti-vaxxer? I don't understand your anger here.

@@SuperToughnut “Do scientists still go on that show?” Yes. I answered your question since you were unable to do the web search yourself. At least 1-2 guests per week are health experts, doctors, or scientists. You’re welcome for the education. 👍

@@DIYTFY thank you

@@DIYTFY Bro. It's heavily skewed to call Dr Malone "the inventor of MRNA tech". He's made a good contribution, but like dozens have people have come after him.

Is that worst than private companies owning Big media ? Interesting point of view

@@atomoyoga Nope. The phrase "one of the" is not the same as "The worst" or "the best." If I like an online influencer, I like to keep a critical POV. That's all. Influence is determined by clicks. Including at big private companies like Spotify.

@@geinikan1kan and how does big Media. CNN, BBC, FOX, RTVE, DR, ZDF, Washington post, New York Times .. finance themselves? Only with your taxes? 🤨 Who do you think it chooses the news you see? A few Pulitzer winners journalists? Or a Committee formed by Lobbies? Basically the same way WHO works... Please you just have to see what happened with the Oxicontin scandle ...

Natural selection rocks though, even if it ain't what it used to be.

Covid made Sam’s brain turn him into a pathological liar. 🤥

@@DIYTFY cry

@@runrafarunthebestintheworld You cry even more..? 😭😭😭

If he wasn’t before his multi-million dollar contract he is no

Not like MSNBC funded Sam Seder’s Majority Report podcast. 💵 💵 💵

A huge part of all these anti Rogan pieces going out are that this is a "live fact check!" As if it's not something that happens multiple times every episode. Jamies whole purpose on the JRE show is to fact check them while they talk. That's the concept of the fucking show. How insane is it that CNN doesnt talk about that? Or even Sam. I expect way better from Sam.

To be honest I don't think these critters realize that's what they're doing. It's strange to watch all these different people want to paint Rogan as a bad guy.

No. He wasn’t. Not even if you say so. 😂