Unfortunately the “sentencing “ in this case isn’t about jail time… it’s about money- Depp will win but turdhead can’t pay him because she doesn’t have 50 million

👍🤣

As well as lying under oath.

sadly it’s a civil case so they won’t prosecute her for it

@@williamnguyen6859 ~ Well that's a sham!

You know her so much🤣🤣🤣🤣

👏

Hahaha

😂😂😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂

😮

Adam that's spot on 👌 .

​@@VIKTOR-ck3dx ..you forgot the make up kit that 'covered' the injuries in some photos.

I have concerns about any inference that the bruising/redness in these photos has been added in the Mac app ‘Photos’ because it does not and never has had the ability to apply or modify colour in select areas like the way one can do with the paint brush in Photoshop or GIMP.

I think after the trial verdict she needs to get ready her jail kit too 😂

Then she tries to use the term metadata like she is an expert in the field later when she gets cross examined lol

Future mommy dearest 🙄

Yea.....Next case, Heards test tube baby that Elon never agreed to have!!!!!

this trial will help the child iyt yo at leastcbecbelieved about het experience when she says her mother is a p€ycho8atic b! tch

I have a narcissist mom

It is awful being raised by a narcissist. Both of my parents are or were and it was an absolute nightmare for me. Then came along my sister who was groomed into becoming one as well. A total child shitshow and still is.

Yes. She sure did.

We all know about this because we all use photo apps

So his testimony proves she provided fake photos as evidence of her so-called battered life. Remind me why we’re wasting time on this woman again? Why can’t they just lock her up now? She’s a disgrace to all women, to domestic violence, to marriage and to Hollywood. Get rid of her

@@LoudMouthsPodcast 🙄

lol, yes so true.

Thank you. I was searching for people who knew something about the topic. This bit is juicy 😉

Grt catch😁

hm, i guess it doesnt really change much though, if she was editing her photos she could have done it at any time.

@@R0bski at least this ruled out the possibility that the iPhone 6 AH used to take the photos in 2016 somehow processed the photos by Photos3.0 without AH knowing it. This just further raised the possibility that AH was lying on court when she said the photos were not edited.

hah, good one indeed

i truly agree...

She got destroyed today lol

💥💥💥💥💥 exposed hard today 😂😂

His lawyers are an awesome team. 👍

Thanks

He was really good. The man knows what he's talking about and how to explain it properly. He wouldn't let anyone irritate him.

Yeah her lawyers are insufferable many people have sympathies for them I don't for me there is no forgiving this kind of behaviour from one person to another.

@@lola-sophiedanton5801 He was awesome!!

He handled that guy well. Didn't buy into the lawyers narrative and made the main point coke across that the photos were edited. I think this is the nail in the coffin for AH

He was way over his head - if he just let the guy talk, we would have found out sooner that no authenticity can be validated.

I was wondering what she is writing.

What is she Always writing?! She takes more notes than her lawyers. Probably just doodling to hide her lying body language.

@@shortee46 exactly

@@Akshay-tj9hm Maybe she's calculating what will be left in her bank account when she loses this case. She keeps recalculating because she can't believe the negative number.

Another KZfaqr said someone zoomed in on what she was writing and said she’s not writing nothing she’s pretending the papers blank.

They are razing her to the ground

nicely put

She's her own worst enemy.

100% it was all her doing. Her greed got the best of her🤓

And for once, she did a great job of it too 😆

It’s a joke 😂wtf could she be writing she’s acting like a lawyer or a psychologist, clear show of awkward guilt she’s avoiding eye contact by doing that crap

Nah she’s writing down what not to do next time she needs to photoshop 😂

She's writing "I should poop on his bed too"

She’s writing Amber Depp in signature in thousands of different fonts.

She’s writing “I’m screwed” repeatedly.

people nowadays will suffer and do everything to get 1 million dollars 😂😂

Well, we don’t know whether they knew this or not…

Lawyers defend their clients and are expected to do so by believing their client. She was the one that lied, they have to scramble to fix the situation. They might be alright lawyers when their client doesn't give them false evidence and then blames them for leaking photos.

probably just a slap on the wrist...she deserves much more though.

Nah, she got a giant slap on the wrist in reality.

This and so many other instances for perjury too, it's amazing she hasn't been yet.

I can't believe they didn't charge her with perjury.

She is obviously going to get away with it.

Exactly!!! I'm so happy he didn't give in.

And I see why people don't like attorney when they do that but he was not playing

@@dachellmcghee8901 Although Jonny's lawyers are very nice. Or don't you think so?

And also at the end, after the judge's pressure, he gave the answer AH's team didn't want to hear: "No".

He did awesome. Held his ground.

even if she won the case which seems unlikely already,there would be a case with all of the lies already proben to be lies,tampered evidence and more amber would be on trial for that after if not loosing this case.

Really?

@@mesalouis8976 she committed perjury by knowingly lying on the stand

It’s not necessarily compressed tho… if you take a pic with your phone and transfer it to Photos on you Mac the file stays the same…

If the photos were extracted from Amber's phone, the expert could and should authenticate the original photos, but he can't. Even if you copy paste it so many times, compressess it to a zip/rar file, the MD5 hash would still be the same, in Amber's case it isn't the same. Also the size differences between the three photos he showed is weird, if only the exif was modified in each file the size difference wouldn't be that big. You can argue the photo wasn't edited but it wasn't the original photo taken from Amber's phone either.

@@admiralmuhamad3109 I could be wrong but didn't he say that he could not identify the images original source because the information given to him were screenshots and not the image files themselves.

@@admiralmuhamad3109 the size difference could be due to multiple transfers (mails, messages app, etc) + she very probably got rid of her old phones over the years and saved her photos elsewhere (like we all do) the photos do look the same, also saying that because it’s written « Photos 3.0 » it’s edited doesn’t make sense, Photos isnt only use to edit photos, in fact it’s mainly use to store and browse your photos only, referring to the software as a « Photo editor » seems a bit oriented here, i’m not on Amber side but i found that specific testimony a bit far-fetch, why not simply comparing the actual pictures and see the differences visually if there are some ? (And btw iphones take pngs not jpgs so he should have started there)…

@@HoShIfox19 He was about to do that but they didn't let him for some reason

She looked furious and writing aggressively.

Agree!

The next lie to tell or what photo to edit next

I think it's quite the opposite.

Actually her being exposed doesn't have any affect on female victims, but it's a small example of how much power females hold with allegations vs males in this corrupt system.

Real victims like Johnny*

@@spongebob8445 females

@@bizarrosmusic1438 how the opposite

Sadly all too familiar with that one.

She could have had him by being a good, decent human being ...makes me think she really has a character flaw or didn't realise what she had till it was too late or sought to use him to get something better than being with him...u got to feel for her too ..she is so far into it that she may never change and be a better being

@@OhBenz87 “…you got to feel for her too…” Screw that. She knew exactly what she was doing. She is a psychopath.

More like she couldn't CONTROL him. She had the chance to have him but she ruined him.

She could have him tomorrow, it's yall who couldn't have him. 🤣 because yall aren't one iota as attractive as amber.

The scary part is that a judge in the UK 🇬🇧 found AH's statements to be grossly "true" and that Johnny was infact a "wife beater"... can you imagine?!? soooo F'd up

The case isn't closed because it's a civil court jury case, and both sides are allowed to argue everything they need/want to argue. They present all that they want, and then the jury decides if anyone owes any money.

@@cokesnorti5168 Alright

I think this trial has performed a healing act of public service and educated the public to the fact that all psychiatrists, psychologists and lawyers are not equal. Nor are either of the sexes. And that gaslighting narcissists should be avoided at all costs. This trial reverberated through many of us shaking up and dislodging old ghosts. So FAR MORE important than a football game imv. But each to their own.

Your haiku may not conform to standard rules.

It was, I hope someone alerted JDs team about the texts Rottenborn was claiming Depp sent in cross when it clearly says INCOMING ... not OUTGOING

I think she is potentially dangerous (more than what she already did). JD is lucky to have gotten away when he did! I think her rage and physical attacks could have escalated. She’s very unstable.

Because the trial is still ongoing... and if they wanted to press charges for perjury that would have to be in a separate trial

Because the us justice system is really bad

​@@CGH250 I'm literally grateful he got out alive. I pray she leaves him alone after this.

It's a civil defamation case it's not criminal or federal. Is what a lawyer says to as why she won't go to jail for it.

It’s still an opinion… not a fact.

@@meganz020 what?

It's because it's not a crimal trial yet

@Batman The it’s an expert opinion. Not fact.

@@jamesvause3418 it’s an expert opinion. Not fact.

to be fair, I highly doubt she intentionally edited them. She could easily fake the injuries with her bruise kit. Most likely it says photos 3.0 from when it was imported to her mac computer, that app is used for organizing your gallery, and from there, it could've been emailed to her lawyers. There would likely be time differences if they were so foolish as to edit new versions of the photos. Amber's team would not bring up faked photos, they know the ramifications. Additionally, lighting difference is likely an automatic lighting filter when the picture was snapped. Analyzing Amber's body language, while she appears nervous and defensive concerning her other lies, she was very firm and confident bout not editing her photos. I believe she is telling the truth on this particular matter, but regardless, the 'evidence' should automatically be tossed out, as there were filters in different versions the court saw for some photos. But point is, she doesn't need to alter lighting when she's got a bruise kit and it would be easier to alter her own lighting and complexion before taking the photo.

@@maaz322 my guy she took three of the exact same photos with the same exact position of everything. Go to your camera and try to take 3 different photos where you look exactly the same, trust me it won’t be the same. Your lip positioning, hair, angle etc will be slightly different every time.

@@21mob56 👍

Yep they brought in the young metadata guy,who they thought knew it all. What a bummer!. The old guy whipped the floor with him lol

Same with Dr Curry, these witnesses know they're going to try to discredit them and it's not working.

how interesting it is to defend against so much data and unreality..🗡️

Too bad he couldn't have checked the bruised eye she sent to Peoples

He stated an opinion, a very irresponsible opinion at 9:14, he has absolutely no reason to believe any of the photos were heavily edited.

I'd take Chris Rock as my lawyer over Elaine, Rottenborn, The guy who sounds like he's a nervous wreck all the time and this new guy who made Amber's team look even worse than they were before.

Yes, these are the strong and powerful women of our sociaty that young girls should be looking upto. Not these fake celebrity idols the mainstream media tries to peddle to corrupt the youth and turn them into regular streams of cashflow as they grow up.

Agree 💯 percent

Fact. Awesome pros.

And then poker face 🤭

I am not sure about other occasions but this is technical stuff. Wtf is she writing about? I mean unless she's a forensic expert, I don't think she knows what the expert is talking about, and thus not know what to note down. Still, faking it! 🤣

She's writing her book 😂

She was trying to avoid the camera by putting her head down and writing garbage

@@jacqueline6640 loooooool

Don't forget Kate Moss saying that she fell on wet stairs. Johnny ran back, carried her, and got medical attention.

This and Morgan Tremaine’s testimony about that leaked TMZ video!

Today she had three lies proven to be her miserabel doing. She is evil. I cannot feel pity for her personality disorders anymore. Josh lock her away for the next twenty years. Give her baby to some loving family.

And TMZ. Planned defamation.

@Pippi Bernstein this is very interesting.

@Pippi Bernstein What a great comment, you explained that so well. Thank you.

Exactly her body language speaks volumes

Hillary clinton Jr.

@Pippi Bernstein Nice Explanation

Unfortunately, her lawyers aren't there to prove she lied. They just need one thing to stick with just one juror to be called into question. It's not about proving truth at all

How is it in Europe defence person? We use defense in the states. Is the UK even in Europe anymore or is it officially its own continent?

🤣🤣🤣👏👏

Yup i felt like i was watching a tv series too

JD's going to be called the biggest reality TV star of 2022.

CHECKMATE!

Well, she's still got all the fake testimony given by her sister and various ex-friends. The damage in the ECB hallway (21 May, 2016) is not backed up by the police body-cam footage, but Whitney's testimony of the staircase incident still hurts JD's case. That's the problem with people who lie in groups - if they co-ordinate and stick together, they outnumber any other witnesses present.

@@nevillec5252 the thing is I think is that Amber and Whitney staircase testimony dont match if I am not mistaken.

@@canella411 Correct, the accounts don't match. See Body Language Guy's illustrated analysis for full details. There are apparently 5 witness accounts of the staircase incident, and apparently JD's account and Travis McGivern, the bodyguard's account are the closest.

She's a narcissist they don't think things out they just think everyone will believe them even when proven wrong

Imagine being the daughter and your sole purpose is to boost your mom's image.

she alredy knows

Oh, she'll know how her mother is. She will know too well, unfortunately.

I hope and pray you are wrong for this little girls sake. I pray she seeks help and turns her life around.

@@Feb121996 I pray she changes as well but when a case like this is available so publicly on most social media platforms, it will never be taken down and her daughter might have to see how her mother "was". I also can't imagine the victimisation she might face from potential bullying as she grows up.

🖤🖤🖤

Her statement didn't age well.

Yes!! Tell them Johnny! And put me out of work for the rest of my life!! Yes

Correction: he TRIED to communicate his findings but was silenced multiple times. In the end, even the judge sided with Heard's lawyer.

@@funkydozer huh? The judge never sided with ambers lawyers lol Jesus Christ some of you people are clueless

@NOSTRADAMUS No. That's not what eventuated. After Heards lawyer objected to an answer the judge overruled. But the witness had forgotten the question and asked the lawyer to repeat it. Heards Lawyer, after FINALLY understanding the SNAFU, tried to casually say 'nevermind, it wasn't important'. However the judge had the court typist re-read the question and the witness was devastating.

@@Onedog7 She specifically requested he answer the lawyer's question with a yes or no answer after he stated to the lawyer he could not do that. I watched the whole testimony live, it's in there if you look.

@@funkydozer it's almost like the questions were constructed to not elicit a one word answer!

Expert makes it even more believable

I don't know if he's saying that - he is just saying they have been through an editor. So she could have changed color levels or brightness etc. Doesn;t mean she changed the bruising, in fact I doubt very much she did that. It would be obvious

​@@robertwilson3866 It is obvious. Also please tell me why you think someone would bother editing a photo through an editing software on Mac when you can change the brightness and etc. on the phone itself, where you have everything you need except the function to make a specific portion of your face look dramatically red.

did you see the ben nye bruise kit that was on the table in the bottom of the photo of johnny passed out with ice cream in his lap??? i wish they'd brought that up 🙃

THANK GOD

I agree, my Daughter is BPD, very beautiful and convincing, rarely questioned. She’s done many of the same things and always the victim. She has ruined so many lives and leaves destruction in her path. Her therapist told her she was the common denominator in every story of chaos.

Oh god I hope it is changing

I hope

You said it best, truly exactly how I’d word it. Couldn’t agree more!

She said she never edits photos… under oath… among other things. Is she gunna be charged for perjury in Australia and the US??! Heard Australia is looking into her involving her dogs, she’s a liar but luckily a bad liar with no foresight

Bet she didn't count on someone looking into the meta data

One can't accidentally edit a photo either

..... who shits the bed 😆💩

@@jenicdarling9425 From my understanding the LA Sheriff department is looking into perjury charges. Johnny's lawyer Mr. Walton took a whole file down to the LA police department, it was then turned over to the Sheriff Dept. But these things also take time. Especially when they want to make sure they get their guy... Or in this case "girl". And Australia is definitely looking to get her. She could get up to 14 years in Australia just for the purgery alone. PLUS in light of new evidence from the UK trial and anything from this trial about the dogs, they may have other chargers for her. But I will say I don't know much on Australian Law, can only speculate on what I have seen so far. I'm sure Australia will take their time, cross all their T's and dot all their I's, they take this very serious and she publicly mocked them after they forced her to publicly apologize to the Australian government and above all people. Then turn around and names her new dog publicly after the Australian PM (I believe that's his title, I very well could have his title incorrect though). She offended a whole country and it's people because she just HAS to be better than everyone else. And she can't even spell phone! F-O-N-E she said from the video mocking Johnny. There's also talk of an appeal going through on the UK case, especially now that it's so well known it was biased from the beginning with a judge that should have recused himself from the case. Anyway, I don't see her coming out of this with no repercussions at all. If not many. Other than public opinion, in which she's done when it comes to that. She will be lucky to even get a voice acting gig after this.

His entire testimony rested on the fact that the photos couldn't be proven or denied as truthful. Saying "it was direct manipulation" let's the AH's team tear down his testimony ("WHO manipulated these photos? HOW do you know she manipulated them herself? So you don't actually know the motive behind photo manipulation, you can only speculate" Saying "these photos can't be verified" is a bombshell in of itself.

I agree!

Agreed!

That, from a legal standpoint, is grounds for an objection and the entire testimony being thrown away claiming " expert bias"

@@undead9999 Manipulated is a software technical term that could have been used in its technical sense.

Her lawyers win either way because they got paid.

@@terriesmith2616 depends if the damage on their career is worth the money,

I don't feel bad for HER lawyers, THEY did NOT HAVE to represent her.

I dont feel sorry at all these people make people to be liars and falsely accuse even accredited, licensed people to be no good without enough proof unlike depps team..they had enough details, references and proof of her lies and defamation, which is revengeful and cruel.

They’re pulling some really scummy stuff. No sympathy, hope their careers are ruined like Heards too.

🤣

From wish

Craigslist maybe? 🤣🤣🤣

@@mmiek796 probably, because that therapist from the other day for AH looked like he needed a therapist and some type of meds.

Coronabay!

Someone screenshot what she was writing from another day it was numbers and things like "this is annoying " I think she just dk what to do when she's being exposed so she writes random things to look smart

@TheMrEpicsounds I agree, I think she’s trying to put the witnesses down by disregarding them and acting bored and distracted. It’s an abuser tactic. If I think little of you, others will think little of you too.I don’t think her ‘notes’ are of importance.

She’s drawing a cartoon of herself killing Johnny with a machine gun. And Johnny is dressed as Capt. Jack Sparrow.

Maybe she’s writing her brief memoirs 🤣

😂

Sociopath

They did it's called Gone Girl but yeah she can maybe star in a sequel cause these days you gotta have a sequel!

@@pr4283 Reality sometimes is stranger than fiction

@@pr4283 I agree

As a graphic design major kinda cool watching this stuff mean something in the courtroom too

@@shemzlove490 HAHAHAHAAH same here!

Not just any photo editing app, one that was released over a year after the photos were taken.

As someone with limited knowledge on the subject (layman but better than my family) is it really that damning? She used a photo editor, but potentially she could have cropped the image or made it more visible. Don’t get me wrong, I think she’s guilty-but shouldn’t there be more information about how the photo was edited? Would he be able to restore the photo to the original imported from her phone? I doubt she made any massive changes using the editor when she can convincingly imitate a bruise with makeup. Sure she could mess with the color, but that wouldn’t make a bruise appear on her arm without photoshopping it right?

@@Amaranthyne It's damning because the use of an external program creates the very real potential the photos have been manipulated in some way and as such means they cannot be classed as authentic originals, and without authentic originals you cannot verify the authenticity of these photos. This is compounded by evidence that manipulation has taken place with at least one example of two visually different versions of the exact same photo proving at least one of them has been edited, and if one has been edited the authenticity of the rest is naturally called into question. This evidence is also in direct contradiction of her claims that those two versions of the same photo were taken at different times with different lighting, this shows she was being deceitful about them in her testimony and calls into the question the veracity of the rest of her claims. It's also impossible to restore these to their original state as the image format only saves the current state, and without the authentic originals it's impossible to determine exactly the extent of any (if any) changes may have been made. To get the authentic originals they need access to the phone on which they're stored on, but if her team had them they would have entered them into evidence in the first place rather than these potentially edited copies. So basically it's damning because they cannot verify the authenticity that the photos haven't been edited with evidence of at least one having been, so their role in proving her claims is much more limited. And she was caught being deceitful in her claims about said edited photo which hurts the believability of the rest of her testimony.

Ya✅

The court is always bias when it comes to this. And on top of that I keep hearing that even though she's wrong....she could still win cuz it's hard to win a defamation case...like I don't get it but I keep seeing that

At this point I believe the jury should find both of them liable in the trial or reach a conclusion that does not accept either side's narrative.

@@ginam6691 how do you see a tie in all of this is beyond me? Unless your just like her.

Yes . PRINCESS ...SKIDMARK...Created her own Mess .

I am not disagreeing but it is worth noting that there is a smear campaign, someone who tracks internet activity has noted large bot activity against Heard 🤷‍♀️ most of it is legit just people against her. But it cannot be denied that apparently there is something else going on too! I will return to link if I can find that video

@@whatasillybilly whether or not there is a smear campaign, the thing is, it's very easy to not like Amber. People like me don't need to be swayed with any campaign to not like her. I'm not even fan of Johnny. But something about Amber is screaming "sinister".

I don't believe she went to college, so maybe she considers this her pre-law education? If there are criminal charges filed after this and she ends up in prison, perhaps she can get a law degree while she's doing time.

When she's not staring at the camera for hours...

Hey, don't say that she pledged it and if JD haven't sued her after 13 months of getting all the payments she could have pledged it again on an international Tv 5-6 times or may be more. . . . But donating on the other hand, Never 🤣

If he wins he could pay the 7 million to the Children's Hospital she "pledged", that would be an epic handless slap on that trash human's face.

@@sunny474747 i was about to yell at you 😂😂

@@sunny474747 LMAO😂I was getting ready to say "Ohh you're tripping tripping after reading the 1st half😂😂Than I got to the 2nd half

Well at least she PLEDGED the entirety 👀🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Amber lied so much about every single thing that i feel like Johnny Depp's team could bring experts to testify for a year and still not have enough time to debunk all of her lies lmao

Really well put i Really don't think many people could really add.

So he basically just said she used an editing software. Although that doesn't mean she photoshopped the bruises. It looks like she put filters on though. She could have used makeup for the bruises, but ya, idk what it does to know she used editing software? We don't know for what she used it for. So...not that impressive.

@@brucewayne2184 I think it just debunks more of her lies. As she has said she 'wouldnt even know how to do that' . She so smoothly lied when shown the 2 exact same pictures by Camile and when Camille asked if one had the saturation increased. It just to put doubt in the jury about her lies/truth

@@brucewayne2184 he actually said a lot more than that, watch his testimony again. He cannot know intent, no one can in court, (lawyers can Argue it but not witnesses), so within thr full confinement of the law he painstakingly went through all the tests he ran and subtly but very clearly indicated all the parts that indicated these photos had been heavily altered and ran through multiple channels to further alter them. Its very important that the team did not use originals, this is not standard for photographs or videos in any case of any type, in any country. I've been involved in low level employment cases in ireland, where its just simpler disputes and we have to use and submit originals of everything. The tampering, considering its a court setting, is extremely serious. He did far more than say it ran through an editor, although that alone would be sufficient to show they did not follow dye process with the provision of evidence. And remember these photos were all over the media to display him as an abuser and those were her claims, the fact she did this and was friends with photographers who have testified, is very bad for her side in terms of credibility. And that's taking his testimony only as a snippet in terms of it being run through an editor.

She's writing or mapping out her prison break 😆

You're wrong. They were different! One was her posing in a vanity mirror that has all those little lights around it! It doesn't matter if the backround light is exactly the same. Or that every single little hair is in the exact same place! Everyone is wrong! 😜

I was saying that exact thing when I first saw it, even if you snap two pictures in a row with a different light turned on, they will not look exactly identical. These ones did. Even if the rest of the pictures were only stored and not edited, we know 100% that one photo was edited, and Amber outright lied about it.

Exactly Especially when she claimed they were at different times, but the reflection light was in exactly the same spot on her forehead. Also her facial expression is exactly the same!

@@LoudMouthsPodcast Hey, I'm not Amber. My whole message was sarcasm. You obviously didn't read the whole thing. Just to be clear, I am very anti-Amber.

What might be more ironic is she may become more infamous after the trial….she may even wrote a book….who knows?

she could get super famous filming her very own version of the story (I mean the one that is in her head). And that umbrella guy will be the evil opponent 😂

@@juelz5844 u mean to tell me we will get more memes after this.

Unless she goes to jail. She will be fine. She will lie and spin the story, that they was against her, take a million other excuses. And like someone else said she will play herself in a movie about this and or her life.

It could be more ironic if she ends up facing the public from an iron house.