i agree. doctor strangerlove my favorite

4637311 2531815 Art is timeless. If there’s a lot of materials contained like Kubrick’s work sure you will discover something new you overlooked before.

In a trio you cannot touch a single musician without changing everything.

frederic orsi, you're soooo right my friend! 👏👏👏

Carlos Braga try bill evans trio

@@mjutteau no

@@bigPianist99 ok

devastatingly sad, indeed Don Nicholson. but KJ has overcome so many setbacks in life that I truly believe he will surprise us all with sth absolutely genious! I love Mr Jarrett with all my heart. most gorgeous piano playing ever!

@@sandraeckelhofer He can do one-handed what others dream of. I became a fan when he was with Charles Lloyd, then with Miles, then solo. Absolute genius.

@@donnicholson3200 absolute genius, indeed. he will certainly do with his right hand more than most can do using both hands. beloved Mr Jarrett!

+bvolat Tighter than a fat kid in spandex.

OH HELL YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BETTY GREEN

they don't like the buzz. i gotta say it kinda bugs me too. UNTIL I STOP BEING so Farrrrking LAZY AND PUT ON MY HEADPHONES. then it's fine. ha ha.

+Giovanna Magliaretta RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BETTY GREEN

+Dick McLamore HOW MANY YEARS?????????????????????? BETTY GREEN

Yes, I wonder what Keith is thinking about when he's playing,if he is thinking at all.

Jarrett is a great improviser no doubt but you’re overlooking the style and personality of titans such as Chick who is harmonically far more complex than Jarrett. Chick invented his own language drawing from jazz and early 1900’s classical composers. Have you listen to Arbour Zena all the way through? Good luck.. there are many aspects to a musician.

WTF?

@@moritzschutz5561 It's definitely the "WTF" comment of the decade.

not really. not night and day different, like say Keith and Chick or Herbie, but no not really. Of course there's some influence in a pianist that grew up probably listening to Kinda Blue a million times, but no, the differences are much greater than the similarities. Phrasing, voicings, comping, the way he builds a solo, note choices.....Every so often there's a line that is similar, but overall, nah. vey simplistic reduction on your part.

Not at all. Evans broke the ice, I give him that but Jarrett is elsewhere.

GeoCoppens what a terribly naive statement! Keith’s solo is the most astoundingly virtuosic piece of spontaneous composition imaginable! The end of that solo with all that counter-rhythmic sequencing is incredible!

Good to hear your response that is not part of this You-Tube "praise-a-thon" for Keith Jarrett. Most comments for recording artists are nothing but gooey suck-up idol worship. I agree that this tempo on You and the Night and the Music is far too fast...a "Vegas-like" tempo, but I think it was purposeful in order to show off Keith's amazing improvisational chops. Great solo and very impressive, but the listenability of this tune ranks rather low. Most fast tempos are difficult to listen to, but even more difficult to feel. This tempo proves that vivace may be impressive but it can't create the feel of a moderate swing groove.

@@jennifer86010 It's a bop feel, a deliberate reaction to swing and the original show tune tempos (and the opposite of a lounge act/big vocalist-backing-band sound, in which the rhythmic accents would be more consistent and less sublte, and slower--see Frank Sinatra's version, kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l7uCe8KTr7W2k30.html). You must hate a lot of post-1945 jazz if you think this is too fast! Likely not chosen to show off (players usually choose ballads for that) but rather to avoid predictability, which would take away from the 'listenability.' No intention here to recreate the feel/groove of a slower tempo, I would guess (it's an odd notion that one tempo would create the feel of another).

Stupid comment ever.

if a song is good enough, it can be played at any reasonable tempo and sound just as good, imo

It's the character of the song that is ruined by Jarrett. Imagine a song like "Smoke Gets In Your Eyes" in up tempo. Awful, will be the result! Jarrett is a poseur, a questionable artist.

I wouldn't say he's questionable, per se, but this is jazz... not classical music.

It has nothing to do with what music it is. Certain pieces by Debussy can be played "wrong" when played too fast. Music can be played wrong in many different way, I would say, jazz or otherwise.

Man this is not wrong, its just a different interpretation. It is perhaps a very free one, but that is what Jazz is all about.