Until it has the fire that pisses on your troops to flaming death.

it's lightly armored so maybe it was expected

for early game it is great, supporting your infantry, flanking enemy AT guns

"In the only proper way."

Well monty is kinda overrated general. He was the cause of the disastrous Operation Market Garden and delayed Western Allies to reach Germany faster.

​@@Cyan_Nightingale Calling Market Garden disastrous is a bit of a stretch, it still did significant damage to the German defence and liberate large parts of the Netherlands, it just failed to reach it main objective of crossing the Rhine river. He still scored major victories in North Africa and elsewhere on the Western front. People just seem to remember him for Market Garden, even though he had a very solid track record overall.

@@lucask4377 It's a failure & waste of manpower & resources. Because of the Market Garden's failure, Western Forces had to replenish for some time and were delayed to enter Germany much earlier than the Soviet Union.

@@lucask4377 Montgomery only won in Al Alamein because he has numerical advantages.. not by strategic genius.

Pretty epic trailer innit.

or something stronger

lmao same

Or at least a new axis faction to counter the british

Bruh CoH3 looks like an arcade game with a sort of realistic but overwhelmingly cartoonish graphic. Still keeping my hopes up though

@@imperialguardsman5929 still in very early development, should be good once the final product is good for release

CoH3 is coming

America sent supplies to the uk for a reason, they knew if the nazis took over Europe they would be next.

@@plantchanger8700 Ehhh, the real answer is a lot more selfish - they knew they could make a buck from it. Hell, WW2 is the main reason America got out of the Great Depression.

remember american lend lease to almost everyone? remember how hard it carried the rest of the allies?

@@marcowashere1615 idk man, 80% of German casualties were against the red army, not the US army.

@@beefyblom when did i speak of casualties? Why ignore the rest of the axis members or the Pacific campaign?

damn lol , now is 22 -_-

kateBM щщ

@kateBM this is not Official account LOL.

Yeah I'm wondering it too...

@@balancetv6924 Me too

@@knanliyev6025 azeri kardeşimi görmek ne kadar güzel bir şey.

@@balancetv6924 Sucuklar

It's reminiscent of World War II propaganda, which I'd categorize broadly as Pop Art, or perhaps Social Realism. You also see a similar art style on WPA-era murals and National Park posters.

if it would those british tanks would be scrap and it defeats the point of a british trailer wouldn't it?

Pretty sure it shot the valentine.

You're so smart, IMPRESSIVE

A medium pc can run it smoothly

It's an old comment but the game is unstabled, but I'm pretty sure a medium pc can handle it. You need ~35 GBs of storage, 8GB of ram and a processor that have over 3 Ghz to run smoothly

Because this game was about the Eastern Front and not the British lol you're lucky we got the British at all

My pet peeve is.....wtf is Hood there? Hood got sunk in 1941

@@man-gi8su I am mad because Churchill can solo panther, even when panther attack from its back. I am mad, because when brits build bofors on VP, its GG, germans have only one type of light arty, which is easly counter by bofors or two entrenched mortars. I am mad, because Tiger is joke compare to Churchill crocodile. Croc can destroy tanks and infantry at the same time with no effort. And you can have more than one. Don't forget about comets, british Pak 43, which cannot be decrewed, armored car with 75mm cannon ( I see this thing very rarely, because people prefer Bofors), cheap infantry, cheap tanks. Balance, I guess.

@@pyrrusi6070 dude try to play with the americans then you will see what it is to really suffer, in my opinion, they are the weakest. Sherman cannot face a panzer 4 ausf j much less the panther, their AT is the worst in the game (except for the jacksons) and they have a great lack of artillery. What I like about the British is that they are very "similar" to the Germans, comet / churchill = panther, firefly = stug, cromwell = panzer 4, etc.

@@felipearruda9039 1 vs 1 Sherman don't stand a chance against panzer IV, but Sherman real strength is in numbers - this tank is cheap, they will usually fight 3 vs 1, against panther they will have at least one Jackson. In mass production of tanks Wehrmacht don't stand a chance (that's why I build only stugs). Also, US have the best infantry, which easly outmatch the wehrmacht counterpart. Each factions have strong and weak sides, and that's my problem with brits - in early their infantry can easly deal with anything thier enemy bring, they will build very fast mortar emplaicment and all axis light arty is f*cked, when they build bofors on VP and fuel, It is GG. And in late game they have their own pak 43, but unlike original, you can't decrew it. They are not only similar to wehrmacht - they are better in every aspect

Bren Gun Carrier (Wasp Mk II flamethrower variant)

to be fair, they did use American tanks too lol

wich one you mean

Its the ww2 history game though