Kevin Conway you have to pay taxes on that. The best outcome is reliable capital appreciation without the dividend, e.g. BRRK.

Peter Payne berk is down huge :(

I Like RDIV as well!!!

Awesome video Jimmy! I like those ETF's and will add them to my portfolio. How about Vanguards low expense ratio etf VYM?

SPHD, VYM, VIG & SCHD

SPLV 1love! )

I like SPYD Great educational video man

Chris ..if u back test ...spyd beats sphd ....big time and both for dividend and total return ..see portfolio visualizer

Cinque Terra That’s true but you’re looking only over a 3 year span since SPYD was created in 2016. In fact you might as well just buy VOO since it beats both these ETFs over their lifetimes.

@@2B_or_not_2B thank you TUBI .. I take your point .... do you think then that sphd might be better long term despite spyd good performance and low expense ratio .... thank u

Cinque Terra As I see it VOO > SPYD > SPHD (since the inceptions of both SPYD & SPHD) and the differences seem to be their global exposure. VOO is 100% US based while the other two are diversified slightly more globally (SPYD = 87% and SPHD = 84% US based). As the US market is the only one exploding I think it’s safe to assume that that’s where the discrepancy comes from. So within a few years when the global markets come back up there should be some evening out. I personally prefer SPHD for the monthly dividends. I like the income and it allows me to faster deploy the cash back into discounted stocks!

@@2B_or_not_2B thank you again Tubi for the insight ... I would much prefer to have sphd and monthly dividends but saw the performace of SPYD and thought twice .... I think I will start adding sphd as the monthly dividends are great and also good for keeping one motivated,,,

it really does though

good videos casgains

@@WW-to5rc If your version of random is buying Dividend Contenders, Aristocrats, and KINGs at very attractive PEs then YES your right.

I apologize, your numbers are what I should have used. What I actually used was a forward dividend yield which basically looked at analyst expectations for dividends and compared it to today's price. I just rewatched the video and I realize that I never clarified that my yield numbers were forward numbers. I meant to say it, but apparently I forgot when I got in front of the camera. Sorry about that, and thanks for clarifying.

Jose Calderon you realize that percentage changes with the change of the price of the fund right?

NOBL seems the best for growth. Their chart just goes up.

Joe D I’m just getting into investing in ETF’s and dividend ETF’s specifically, please forgive the ignorance. Is the advantage to SPHD over SPYD you’re talking about being able to re-invest every month, so you’re able to take advantage of compounding your position (i.e. more shares) every month rather than having to wait to do it by the quarter?

@@hulenbryant5637 yes, exactly

Joe D Thanks! I had heard good things about SPHD. It will definitely be on my radar now.

Sorry joe but u are totally incorrect ....if u back test spyd and sphd ....spyd has more dividend income each year plus it also has a bigger total return plus it has more qualified dividends. If u doubt me run the 2 funds through portfolio visualizer.

I have sphd, keep on building those monthly dividends.

Also check our ryld, it's a covered call ETFs that pays almost 1% a month

I'll dig around and see what I can come up with

Learn to Invest God bless you buddy. Wishing you a successful 2020.

This is a bit late but still: There are two types, Distributing and Accumulating. If you only ever want to reinvest dividends into the same ETF it came from, or dividends received are taxed higher than capital gains in your country, then accumulating is the best. If you want to take dividends and distribute them among your portfolio, or dividends received are taxed lower than capital gains, or if you want to take dividends as income, you want Distributing. There are sometimes different fees for management between the two types, but outside of that they basically do the same thing. IMO: Young and passive? Accumulating. Young and active? Distributing. Retired and wanting income? Distributing.

Thanks 😀

It's actually a bit trickier than that (and a bit simpler at the same time). So the ETF company takes the fee out of the performance of the fund so we don't actually see (at least not directly) the fee get taken out. So if you bought an ETF for $100 dollars per share and held it for exactly 1 year. Assuming the underlying stocks were up exactly 10%, if the fee was a 1/2%. Well the ETF price would show all that by only showing a current price of $109.50 vs the $110 it should actually be. So if you sold right then you are up 9.5% and although you didn't directly see the fee, you can see it in the performance of the ETF.

Thanks for the heads up, I'll correct that

@@LearntoInvest glad to help ;)

Dividends from REIT's are non qualified and therefore taxed at your normal tax rate instead of the 15%/20% for qualified dividends. SPYD would have more non qualified dividends out of this group.

Always at pullback.

Fair enough, and I'm a huge fan of VOO and VTI. I couldn't use those here though, since they're not dividend ETFs, but they are great for broader market ETFs :)

@@LearntoInvest So which of these can I add to my dividends only portfolio if it was you?

SPHD has the same beta and pays 20.9% MORE than SPYD per quarter---if you reinvest SPHD's monthly dividend.

moogs15 yes. You will not notice it being charged though. It is automatically adjusted on your returns.