Then what do they teach you in college- How not to be incinerated in a nuclear blast? (Still useful though...)

@@clex2349 That RBMK reactors don't just explode.

@@clex2349 I'd say a bit more useful

- And I created physics; & neather have I! (heard of it)

Ever heard of metastable nuclear isomer ? www.thoughtco.com/nuclear-isomer-definition-4129399 That's also an incredible thing I discovered just a few years ago... (but I am a mathematician).

We need the Argent Tower

lazer technology getting super effecient every year. The answer lies there.

Sounds like we need more funding

We need more efficient.... everything. No i'm not kidding. Inefficiency is what is really f**king humanity over right now.

​@@Deboned_butter Here we gooo

2πminutephysics* :p

@@thomasdam9916 you mean tauminutephysics?

@@jormam69 yeah τminutephysics is the same. But since the video's covering muons ( not pions or taons) shouldn't he've made the video mu minutes long? 🤔🤔

u r that guy who appeared in blackpenredpen's video?

That's not τ minutes. It's 6.45 minutes. τ minutes would be 6:17

Your style of humor is strange, but charming.

that was awful, get your coat.

Haha I see what you did there, very amuonsing.

mu-on

HAHAHAHAHAHAH huAHahaUAHAa AAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!! AAAAHAHAHAHHHH?????

Vantblack, tantalum carbide, tungsten metal... the universe gives us plenty. The thing is we've gotta EARN it, we've unlocked a few perks already we just need to grind a few more levels before we can start getting the REALLY awesome stuff.

You have the logic backwards; these particles are exotic and interesting *because* they don’t live for long, and thus we don’t see their effects very well. The stable ones are abundant because they stick around, so we’re familiar with them, and they don’t seem as fantastic.

@@KnakuanaRka You've hit the nail on the head. The word "interesting" is just a matter of personal taste. In my view protons, neutrons and (first and formost) neutrinos are much more interesting than all these exotic particles.

@Jonathan Stiles do *Cough*graphene*Cough*

If they didn't have such short lifespans they would be mundane rather than exotic, like neutrinos and electrons. At one point in history having ice ready for consumption in every household was unobtanium, now it's just a routine part of our lives.

So, Ant Man is a walking fusion bomb?

this actually would be a great explanation for ant man. perhaps pim-particles stabilize muons?

I think the muon would be the pim particle here.

You'd also be even heavier than your current weight. So ~200 times smaller, and ~200 times heavier... That's 200^2 more mass to volume ratio. Which means that you're more likely than not to break the floor under you.

Not quite... only the electrons are replaced with heavier particles. All other things (the nuclei) stay the same. So, no floor breaking until you start the fusion.

It's a **STAR**

New sheet just got made!

Some stars burn out and die

Bigger stars burn out and die with P A S S I O N ! ! !

Other stars burn out and die with PASSION

Changed like 7 years ago. Maybe it's the french "minute" , which would simply mean "short"

And it works. Cold Fusion works, and scientists get it done in centers for scientific studies like the higs boson

@@blueredandyellow8389 what

The method described in this video goes way back farther than that!

@@tomlxyz They can do it using th is method which doesn't heat, but it takes more energy to do it than what comes out of it.

@@tomlxyz See the video, it can be done, but at present time is a net consumer of energy, with little hope of improvement.

We haven't even made a gram of it and if we were made of antimatter we wouldn't know

@@MenacingPerson Actually, certain physical processes do treat antimatter differently from matter. This is known as C violation or CP violation. CPT symmetry may be exact, but maybe not.

Guaranteed cold fusion for about 10 nuclei but takes more energy than muon generation, as it is both heavier and shorter lived

Tau-aided? *XENOS HERESY*

@Rooper K 01000001 01001100 01001100 00100000 01001000 01000001 01001001 01001100 00100000 01010100 01001000 01000101 00100000 01001111 01001101 01001110 01001001 01010011 01010011 01001001 01000001 01001000

@@MrCreeper6000 ALL HAIL THE OMNISSIAH What is an omnissiah

@@Videohead-eq5cy Legit numbers?

Ananya Pathak . Still seems like a good idea, just make sure you have proper shielding.

hold a magnet next to a light bulb and you are done.

but you must!

Well, this happened: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g82SncVpl5idlmw.html

That pun was heavier than normal ;)

I always that that was cations.

Muons are emitted by cations, but only when they feel affectionate.

Meown

Cations are also known to produce purrtons

its the cow particle in some american accents

3 ys has passed.

Bozon: I’ll hold your existence

Definitely "current engineering" limits. We wouldn't even be studying this if this process is inherently physically net negative.

the 5 GeV is an engineering limit. The other are all pretty much physics limits.

Reydriel I'm not so sure about that. The fact that muons are so massive means it's going to take a lot of energy to make them. I'm sure the limit is substantially lower than 5 GeV but it's not nothing either. As for research, even if it were conclusively proven that this could never be used for a net positive reactor, people would still study it. The knowledge that could be gained could have a far reaching impact on many fields, not just fusion power.

We could have a hybrid reactor, muon aided hot fusion

Nabre Labre Why? You could have used half the energy you used to make the muons to instead just heat up the plasma and get hot fusion for less energy.

mi·nute3 /ˈminit/Submit noun plural noun: minutes; noun: minute 1. a summarized record of the proceedings at a meeting.

@@connerstevons9247 why not minutes physics ????????????? XD, its just a joke

The same complaint has been levelled for centuries against the 'minute waltz'...

Maybe they're minute pronounced the other way, mine-oot, as in really tiny.

Check out the channel Great Big Story they have a bunch of vids 1 minute or less.

OMG XD

yeah

Instead of comment spamming on dozens of channels like you do

@@overkill246 what do you mean?

BanditRants Yeah unlike your content

Jk

Na. If I understood your comment correctly, that might also result in preventing the fusion in the first place.

But the ionization energies of hydrogen-muon should be different to helium-muon, hence shooting lasers at helium-muon energies should not affect hydrogen-muon bonds, unless I'm missing something here (which I should)

That would probably also take quite a bit of energy, as well as expose sensitive precise light emmiting equipment to the energies relased by said fusin (which is a barrier to any attempts to split them off really)

@@thomas.02 You're only missing laboratory confirmation. Much support to you in your research.

Indeed. Also, packing the Deuterium closer together in the first place. Perhaps liquid metallic deuterium with muons shot at it in a tuned electromagnetic field that discourages alpha-sticking?

all of these things are google searchable and some people will definitely be able to explain them to you. *energy* is the ability to do work, its literally the capacity for something to happen, i dont think you can get a more basic definition. if it happens, it takes *energy*. *matter* is like a concentrated form of energy which has properties like electric charge, *mass*, *volume*, density, texture etc. speaking of *volume* though, its the amount of *space* taken up by the matter. *space* is really just part of spacetime which you could probably describe as existence itself. its basically distance, with distance being currently defined as the change in position of light in a certain amount of time. Ive talked about *energy* and ive talked about *mass*, but i havent explained how either of them actually work. *mass* is able to exert a *force* towards itself from all directions (gravity), as well as being able to be acted on by the gravitational force of other matter or other completely different forces. a *force* is anything that can change the momentum of *matter*. and it uses *energy* to do so. *mass* can apply a *force* that permeates all of *space* but is actually affected by its *volume*. im tired of typing this hopefully its good enough

You don't become billionaire by helping humanity, unfortunately.

@@jonathanodude6660 One error there, the force of gravity exerted by mass is affected by the amount of mass and not the volume that the mass takes up.

Also, one could argue that gravity isn't actually a force, but an *effect* of the 4D spacetime curvature which makes objects that are moving in a straight line in 4D look like accelerating objects moving in a curved line to us mere 3D beings.

you cannot calculate the curvature in space with just the mass. volume always has to come with the mass. @@zilianthegreat

@Freezi Boii The energy used to create. Muon is far greater than what it gives off with fusion and its own mass energy equivalent. However if you use the waste 49x mass energy from the muon creation for some other purpose or recycle it in some way couldn't you get a net positive result?

The "Cold Start" is not the problem that stops Fusion from being viable. It's not like Fission where if you just achieve critical mass the reaction will take care of itself. Fusion is achieved by creating and maintaining a high-energy environment that allows fusion to occur. Creating these environments is difficult, but not impossible: (lasers, plasma discharge, particle accelerator...). Maintaining the environment is harder(, but still within our capabilities. But so far, the fusion-environments we've been able to create don't cause enough fusion events to pay for their upkeep. To make matters worse, much of the energy released by the fusion (and accompanying high temp plasma) is in the form of high energy X-Rays and Neutrons, which are dangerous and hard to capture. Current areas of research to improve fusion are: -Improved Containment to reduce energy loss from the high-energy environment -Improved energy-capture, to try to make use of the Neutrons and X-Rays -Improved fusion fuels whose products are easier to capture (but which require even more intense environments).

U 1st u win

@@dr.blockcraft6633 Seriously? Thats fascinating.

You mean, before everything starts fusing together? Relatively similar, except for much higher ionisation energies. Point is moot though, because nothing is stable enough to do any chemistry experiments with it.

Hard to know, just like with the supermassive atoms. They decay way too quickly.

i feel like theyd be able to hold together molecules thatd be sterically hindered due to smaller muon clouds, though if every single electron was replaced with muons and the muon molecules were only reacted with other muon molecules then i doubt that anything would actually be different since it would be identical to if the atom was just smaller and making every atom smaller would just be a scale model of sorts

The energy of the future which will always remain so. :-D

@@jjeherrera I see you follow the research closely, there is some progress being made, it just takes a lot of efforts and funding which governments often see fit to put elsewhere. It will come, we just have to be patient and not trust clicbait articles saying it's 30 years away, it might still be a full century away, depends how fast we solve current problems with commercially viable sustained net positive fusion

The great thing about fusion is that it somehow manages to never get old and obsolete. No matter how long passes, it keeps being the hot new up-and-coming energy of the future that's just a few years away! :D

@@wasd____ I mean, it is the energy of the stars. Who wouldn't want that?

generate muons, generate power, to generate muons, to generate power.... cue: "infinite Power" by TheFatRat

nope. its make your own lunch or steal it from someone.

Any chance of creating muons with solar energy? Could muons be generated in space and beamed back down to a muon cold fusion device on the ground? Throwing some sci-fi ideas around here. That's how the aliens power their tech. Muon cold fusion. Muon beam weapons. Muon force fields.

Tanstaafl.

@@briand8090 muons last for a very short period of time. the only way they can be useful is if we can get easy and efficient ways of getting muons and then using them right away. if were using the solar energy anyways, why complicate things?

You're correct, it's confirmed but way, way too inefficient. You can get a trace of hydrogen to fuse but it's nearly impossible to increase the efficiency unless you have liquid metallic hydrogen which is pretty much unobtainium at the moment.

You must not forget several other laboratories picking up tritium.

Sami Tynninen not sure if I’m gonna get woooshed, but muons are different from myons. Muons last for an extremely short amount of time.

actually, they are the same just different writings.

Agamemnon AFAIK, the plural form of muon is muons, and myons are something else. Point is, muons can’t be bought at costco because they last for for fractions of seconds.

AFAYK is the problem here. "muon" is the english version, because of pronounciation of the letter y. They are absolutely the same thing.

*face-plant*

You'd also explode in a cloud o instant fusion, so there's that.

You would explode into a human fusion reaction.

And even if you magically didn't spontaneously become a giant ball o' fusion, all the muons would decay within a split second, and you would spring back to full size as they became electrons, though more likely you'd probably just disintegrate since there's no way all your nuclei would find their way back to their correct spots. In short, replacing all your electrons with muons = BAD IDEA.

New Gatorade with Muons, its what plants crave!

And that ladies and gentlemen is how you get super powers.

That's complete nonsense. Yes it heats up, that's the whole point isnt it? 'room' temperature is compared to millions of kelvin, so it could still be 100's of celsius. But if you're saying that low temp steam isnt very efficient, I completely agree.

@@DKTAz00 No, what I'm saying is that 'room temperature' has a specific meaning, and 2000K isn't it. A consistent feature of these silly 80's cold fusion reactors was the idea that because it's so low energy you can make the reactor out of ordinary materials with no radiation shielding, often with devices smaller than your average diesel generator. That's so far from correct that you can't even call it nonsense anymore. Fun fact, one of the most popular of these scam devices, the Energy Catalyzer, was "tested" in 2015. It heated up to over 1000C and exploded, _just_ from chemical reactions between the supposed catalyst and hydrogen without any fusion. I'm not trying to sling mud at the idea of fusion at temperatures lower than normal, just at the crackpots who have completely bastardized the idea with preposterous claims based on their total lack of understanding of physics. For instance, the claims of electrolytic cells which produce kilowatts of power from hundreds of watts of input power (or even zero input power) by converting things like nickel and hydrogen to copper, something so infeasible it doesn't even happen in supernovae. Or the even more numerous crackpots who claim their device totally works but they're being suppressed by the evil fossil fuel companies, and offer to sell (but not demonstrate) the devices for huge sums of money. I say '80s style' because all this nonsense started in the 1980s when a convicted criminal, Andrea Rossi, heard about muon catalyzed fusion and decided to run with the idea and try to separate some fools from their money. I don't know if he made any money, but he certainly inspired a lot of fools to try to reproduce his 'work'. To even attempt to do so requires a complete lack of understanding or willful ignorance of pretty much everything related to power, fusion and physics in general. There are countless reasons why these silly devices can't work, but my favorite is simply pointing out that even if the device worked, it would destroy itself with the energy you failed to capture. It would also kill everyone in the vicinity with a fun mix of deadly radiation, but mostly it'd be the neutron and gamma radiation that nobody has ever bothered to deal with in these designs. And yes, you'd get a fatal dose of radiation more or less instantly even at just a few kilowatts. Real power plants have mechanisms to deal with waste heat, something seen only occasionally on these scam devices. They're usually extensively insulated, in fact, because the scam generally relies on amplifying measurement errors and intentional flaws in methodology to make a system look like it's getting hotter than it should.

You never could capture 100% of energy generated. Of any energy - generating system. The biggest goal is to get out more than you put in. To get a net gain of usable energy after you hit activation energy of a system.

Cold-er fusion I guess

@Håkan Lundberg there is no scientific definition of cold, however when we talk cold fusion we usually mean fusion happening at temperatures considerably lower than the Sun or a tokamak.

Pydrax Alpta What is the reference to this format of jokes

@@oremooremo5075 I don't really know.. I read them as memes and never found out the original.

Also why are people liking this it doesn't even rhyme..

@@PydraxAlpta because ppl like to like comments

@@kyrlics6515 true

It's too vacuous. You see, the reason that doesn't cause fusion to happen is because it increases with the SQUARE of their quantity - it only facilitates fusion between 2 hydrogens if they both have muons instead of electrons. Which means that if only 1 in 1000 hydrogens has had its electrons replaced with muons, only 1 in 1 million interactions between hydrogens will have 2 with muons meeting.... but if you improve that to 1 in 100, suddenly it's 1 in 10 thousand instead of 1 in a million. So you see, the rate at which fusion happens would go drastically down very quickly as the density of muons goes down. It's all or nothing, you need a LOT of them or it is useless. And a single cosmic ray may have a lot of energy but it still just doesn't produce LARGE quantities of muons. It's too sparse.

@@medexamtoolsdotcom Plus you would need to transport them inside your fusion reactor in less than 2 microseconds

Anyway, everyone already knows that.

Don't forget the you'uns from Pittsburgh and Appalachia.

Depends on your prespective

Sometimes they behave like particles sometimes they behave like waves (sorry for grammatical errors)

depending on if you are measuring them or not. fascinating

actually your grammar is fine. also explaining this phenomenon while getting into all the electron behaviour as waves and particles is impossible in even under 10 minutes, especially since you must assume most viewers have minimal background in physics. i think more than educating people about science, these kind of youtube vids can get people interested in physics and perhaps presume in a more academically professional setting.

And so is literally every other quantum object.

lol...no

Not going to happen but hot fusion might be a thing in your lifetime if you still have a few decades left to go.

Who doesn't want cold fusion?

Not sure about cold fusion, but I'm still hoping mining asteroids might become profitable sometime soon.

@@GTA5Player1 Platinum and Gold for days!

That would be × if we all talked in f(×)=y

Cold fusion is not a myth, but cold fusion capable of producing usable energy is. There was "cold fusion craze" many decades ago when several questionable papers were published which claimed to have developed fusion at room temperatures practical for power generation, but each of them were disproven pretty quickly. Few mainstream scientists agree with these papers today, citing numerous experimental and conceptual flaws and lack of reproducibility of the results. In contrast, this method of using muons to fuel room temperature fusion is legitimate and well-established, but as mentioned in the video, cannot be used practically as a power source.

I thought it was being reconsidered: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ec9-d9SSq7azZHU.html

So how about using muons to create an profitable fissile-able material?

@@xplinux22 Eyal Kalderon I don't see why it's impossible to produce muons with less energy. If they can get the number to a fraction of what it is now, it could work.

I guess that until then we'll have to keep doing deals with Saudi Arabia and getting into wars in the middle east. I mean, muon fusion can't generate enough energy, solar panels aren't efficient enough, I guess we should just give up and go work for the oil companies.

@@00O3O1B issa joke

You gotta problem with taking a mere five minutes of your life to learn this? Or are you afraid you would be obsessed with the concept, make it into reality, and win the Nobel Prize for Physics?

You can bring it down to 3 minutes, if you double the speed you watch it at

@Tu'Orb Are you related to Ginny by any chance?

@@connerstevons9247 eeeh. Minute is singular so it kinda is. It's minute physics not minutes physics.

Sachin Fulsunge . Is this an old meme, there is reasons for it.

@@robertt9342 are*

sum CLINT . Nope, missed important details there.

but watching the video let's you learn some other cool things

I know just being a dick (: was expecting more than this though

And he still got it wrong. Lol

Only because the creation of mu particles is inefficient and not directly possible without creating other particles as well. If you could use that waste energy to facilitate some other reaction couldn't it then be efficient?