The No Cloning Theorem

  Рет қаралды 2,472,667

minutephysics

minutephysics

Күн бұрын

Support MinutePhysics on Patreon: / minutephysics
Three Blue One Brown: / @3blue1brown
Why you can’t clone Schrödinger’s cat: this video presents the full proof of the “No Cloning” Theorem in Quantum Mechanics - without any fancy math! (stereotypical qubit has been replaced with Schrödinger’s cat).
The full proof relies on the linearity of quantum (aka unitary) transformations, and the tensor product of multiple systems, to show that perfect cloning is impossible (though teleportation is allowed)
Thanks to everyone who supports MinutePhysics on Patreon!
Link to Patreon supporters here: www.minutephysics.com/supporte...
REFERENCES:
The No-Cloning Theorem: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-clon...
MinutePhysics on Schrödinger’s Cat: • Schrödinger's Cat
Original No-Cloning Paper by Wootters and Zurech: www.nature.com/nature/journal/...
Original “Beyond No-Cloning” (ie, no-cloning workarounds) paper by Buzek & Hillery: arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9607018
Optimal Quantum Cloning paper: arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9801009
Optimal Quantum Cloning paper II: arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9910048
Quantum Cloning: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum\_cloning
The History of Schrödinger’s (& Einstein’s) Cat: nautil.us/issue/41/selection/h...
The Stability of Black Powder (from the Civil War!): www.jpyro.com/wp-content/uploa...
Proof by contradiction: www.personal.kent.edu/\~rmuhamma/Philosophy/Logic/ProofTheory/proof\_by\_contradictionExamples.htm
MinutePhysics is on Google+ - bit.ly/qzEwc6
And facebook - / minutephysics
And twitter - @minutephysics
Minute Physics provides an energetic and entertaining view of old and new problems in physics -- all in a minute!
Created by Henry Reich
Music by Nathaniel Schroeder

Пікірлер: 6 400
@MinutePhysics
@MinutePhysics 7 жыл бұрын
Hello everyone! I am back from a 2+year comment hiatus and excited to say hi! (my account wasn't linked with any google+ account, so I couldn't comment on KZfaq from the MinutePhysics account for the last 2-3 years; google finally gave up on google+ enough that now I can comment on KZfaq again!!)
@Eduardo-bq6is
@Eduardo-bq6is 7 жыл бұрын
goood!! btw will you continue uploading videos? PD: your channel is awesome :)
@yassir-5605
@yassir-5605 7 жыл бұрын
WOOO coool !
@thesasselife8214
@thesasselife8214 7 жыл бұрын
welcome back!
@Vatsyayana87
@Vatsyayana87 7 жыл бұрын
Hello Mr. Min-phys, I cant remember your name but trust me its a warm welcome none the less.
@thesasselife8214
@thesasselife8214 7 жыл бұрын
i believe his name is Henry.
@ItsSansom
@ItsSansom 7 жыл бұрын
(Ten) MinutePhysics
@TheSmackan
@TheSmackan 7 жыл бұрын
Got to get that ad revenue.
@bmpianovids
@bmpianovids 7 жыл бұрын
I'd hate to see this explained in 1 minute
@magixo_
@magixo_ 7 жыл бұрын
thought so too, but awesome vid!!
@ItsSansom
@ItsSansom 7 жыл бұрын
BM Piano Yeah most of the stuff on this channel is impossible to explain in a minute. Just find it funny that the whole idea of the channel has gone out the window
@nabeelsherazi8860
@nabeelsherazi8860 7 жыл бұрын
pleb - ist i mean if he wanted ad revenue he wouldve split the video into 5 separate 2 minute videos
@spartan8705
@spartan8705 7 жыл бұрын
Heisenberg was stopped by the police. The officer asked "Do you know how fast you were going?" Heisenberg responds "No, but I knew EXACTLY where I was."
@AbdelW460
@AbdelW460 7 жыл бұрын
Iron_Spartan-137 The officer tells him that he was driving at 90 mph. Heisenberg responds angrily:"oh great! Now I'm lost!"
@spartan8705
@spartan8705 7 жыл бұрын
Great!
@deltablues24
@deltablues24 7 жыл бұрын
you guys made my day
@TKDWILSON
@TKDWILSON 7 жыл бұрын
The cop searches the car because of the odd behavior. The checks the trunk and shouts "You guys know there is a dead cat back here?" Schrodinger shouted from the back seat, "THERE IS NOW JERK"
@hotdrippyglass
@hotdrippyglass 7 жыл бұрын
+
@oneautumnleaf5270
@oneautumnleaf5270 5 жыл бұрын
Noobs all you need to do is Ctrl + C and Ctrl + V
@cypher1o1
@cypher1o1 5 жыл бұрын
Noobs all you need to do is Ctrl + C and Ctrl + V Noobs all you need to do is Ctrl + C and Ctrl + V
@brokkrep
@brokkrep 5 жыл бұрын
Control or how it is prounced in german: *_Steuerung_*
@robertodelier9999
@robertodelier9999 5 жыл бұрын
copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste
@alexanderharrison7421
@alexanderharrison7421 5 жыл бұрын
IQ 3,000 IQ 3,000 IQ 3,000
@ikannunaplays
@ikannunaplays 5 жыл бұрын
Or an old pre windows method that still works on everything, Shift delete, Shift insert
@DenisLoubet
@DenisLoubet 4 жыл бұрын
My cloning machine searches the universe for a perfect clone, and teleports it to the user.
@eliwalker1058
@eliwalker1058 4 жыл бұрын
Just because it doesn't remain a perfect clone doesn't mean it never was
@eliwalker1058
@eliwalker1058 4 жыл бұрын
@@Satheo05 clone a vase and drop one... Are they no longer clones?
@eliwalker1058
@eliwalker1058 4 жыл бұрын
So things aren't clones unless they occupy the same space?
@calculuswalulu7560
@calculuswalulu7560 4 жыл бұрын
HowStupidlyLongCanThisNameThingAllowMeToGo??? ???? Even objects change over time. The vase might lose some particles or get dustier than the other.
@MaoDev
@MaoDev 4 жыл бұрын
@@Satheo05 It could still lose some particles and be slightly different. Just because it is no longer a perfect copy it doesn't mean it never was.
@QuarkGamingLLC
@QuarkGamingLLC 7 жыл бұрын
I was gonna make a joke about cloning, but someone might copy it. Edit: Why did I think this was funny? Its legit a facebook level joke
@Fanta69420
@Fanta69420 7 жыл бұрын
ah dam i was gonna copy it
@zarifsafwanhoque4127
@zarifsafwanhoque4127 7 жыл бұрын
I see what you did there!
@gracegrass4462
@gracegrass4462 7 жыл бұрын
I was gonna make a joke about cloning, but someone might copy it.
@AvailableUsernameTed
@AvailableUsernameTed 7 жыл бұрын
I was going to make a. .. doh!
@luigi1fan1
@luigi1fan1 7 жыл бұрын
Cloning a joke is theoretically impossible. You see, jokes have several factors other than the joke itself that make it funny. If I were to just copy and paste your joke, the timing would be different, author would be different, and the amount of likes would probably be different too. You won't have to worry about someone cloning your joke, only re-posting it.
@Joeobrown1
@Joeobrown1 7 жыл бұрын
i once interfered with myself and left a nice pattern on the wall
@vipuldr1
@vipuldr1 7 жыл бұрын
Lol....extremely funny
@hdef6602
@hdef6602 7 жыл бұрын
xD
@25NN25
@25NN25 7 жыл бұрын
good one
@babatulani6361
@babatulani6361 7 жыл бұрын
i was reading the comments while listening to the video right when he said this line, i came across this. creepy.
@chromemaster3519
@chromemaster3519 7 жыл бұрын
Seminal art? I guess if frescoes are a thing so can that be a thing too.
@coronelkittycannon
@coronelkittycannon 4 жыл бұрын
Object a = new Object(); Object b = a.clone(); Ha!!
@nyxa8734
@nyxa8734 4 жыл бұрын
or... just.. object b = a;
4 жыл бұрын
@@nyxa8734 Depending on the language, this (b=a) would make b only a reference to a, whereas b=a.clone() creates a new object.
@sirsulo9102
@sirsulo9102 4 жыл бұрын
Object a; Object b; memcpy(&b, &a, sizeof(Object));
@aaronseet2738
@aaronseet2738 4 жыл бұрын
Is it a deep clone?
@MonyoDS
@MonyoDS 4 жыл бұрын
// Compile in code chef, tutorialspoint or gcc // Compilar con/Compile with: gcc -Wall -std=c99 -o clone clone.c #include #define FALSE 0 #define TRUE 1 typedef struct point { int x,y,active; } Point; int main() { Point one = {8,16,TRUE}; Point two = one; Point *ptr = &one; //Change [&one] to [&two] printf("Point one: x: %d y: %d active: %d Point two: x: %d y: %d active: %d ",one.x,one.y,one.active,two.x,two.y,two.active); if (&one == &two) puts("one and two are equal"); else puts("one and two are not equal"); //Always not equal if (&one == ptr) puts("one and ptr are equal"); else puts("one and ptr are not equal"); //Depends on ptr address if (&two == ptr) puts("two and ptr are equal"); else puts("two and ptr are not equal"); //Depends on ptr address printf("Point one address: %p Point two address:%p ",&one,&two); return 0; } //GCC Approved this
@inventor4279
@inventor4279 3 жыл бұрын
ngl fam, totally read "no clothing theorem"
@datblue1104
@datblue1104 3 жыл бұрын
bruh
@valovanonym
@valovanonym 3 жыл бұрын
Hu... me too You actually made me realise it wasn't
@highestalmond7558
@highestalmond7558 3 жыл бұрын
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
@pinkdoor2450
@pinkdoor2450 3 жыл бұрын
LOL SAME
@aldob5681
@aldob5681 3 жыл бұрын
click bait!!!!! ahahahahahahaha
@thomasr.jackson2940
@thomasr.jackson2940 7 жыл бұрын
Very mixed feelings in re to format length. Longer and more in depth is great. But I would hate to lose the shorter format that really made your brand. They both serve a purpose. Two channels is probably not a good solution, especially from a business perspective. Perhaps clearly mark each format, perhaps not just by name, (ten minute physics works), but by some distinctive visual clue. This works on other channels that have multiple formats. People can readily pick out the series they want. You can keep separate playlists for those checking out your back catalogue.
@PennyHerbst
@PennyHerbst 7 жыл бұрын
Great idea. Thumb up so he can read this
@gracegrass4462
@gracegrass4462 7 жыл бұрын
+
@irok1
@irok1 7 жыл бұрын
Or just post two videos. One cool style and one to somewhat satisfy KZfaq and be longer
@CackleCake
@CackleCake 7 жыл бұрын
Or you could just look at the length of the video to determine if it is 1 min or 10. not trying to be rude but a 'distinctive visual clue' just seems a bit unnecessarily difficult and pointless
@jibbyjackjoe
@jibbyjackjoe 7 жыл бұрын
Thomas R. Jackson the way KZfaq is set up, they force creators to have longer videos to stay relevant. It's out of the creators hands. They have to adapt to the situation is around them.
@ianirizarry30
@ianirizarry30 7 жыл бұрын
people that are interested in what you have to say most likely have an attention span that is
@Kaepsele337
@Kaepsele337 7 жыл бұрын
You mean >60s?
@DarthBiomech
@DarthBiomech 7 жыл бұрын
"people lost interest in anything longer than 10 seconds unless it's boxing match"
@vilestine
@vilestine 7 жыл бұрын
I watch these videos just to be reminded that I am dumb as hell and have no clue what he is talking about. But the topics are interesting!
@zef3k
@zef3k 7 жыл бұрын
real steel?
@ofthehunt4243
@ofthehunt4243 7 жыл бұрын
Vilestine try crash course physics! Everyone deserves their universe's rule book
@dkpsyhog
@dkpsyhog 6 жыл бұрын
Why are you putting a box of unstable gunpowder that may or may not explode at any moment through a cloning machine?
@idot3331
@idot3331 6 жыл бұрын
For science
@johnvena72
@johnvena72 6 жыл бұрын
Yes
@ianmann5040
@ianmann5040 6 жыл бұрын
A lot of things are in superpositions like the gunpowder
@gorisenke
@gorisenke 6 жыл бұрын
Because you really don’t care about your cloning machine, or you just got a new one so you’re trying to blow it up with two gunpowder explosions at once right after it cloned the original exploding gunpowder.
@neutronstar6739
@neutronstar6739 6 жыл бұрын
Makes me think if there were a cloning machine that everyone can afford, there will be youtubers doing video about it. "Cloning a hot metal knife cutting through spacetime" With shitty editing thumbnail and some arrows.
@danij5055
@danij5055 4 жыл бұрын
0:29 "There are a few too many atoms of carbon-14 in the new canvas." I loved that one! 😂
@Master_Therion
@Master_Therion 7 жыл бұрын
1:22 "The universe is a party pooper, and perfect cloning is impossible." So, the universe says: No cloning around!
@SD-mc2ef
@SD-mc2ef 7 жыл бұрын
*groan*
@MapleyNexus
@MapleyNexus 7 жыл бұрын
Master Therion *Laugh Track Plays*
@Doktor_Vem
@Doktor_Vem 7 жыл бұрын
Perfect reaction! 10/10! xD
@pedrogoncalves9882
@pedrogoncalves9882 7 жыл бұрын
Nice Antivist logo!
@MisterBrrown
@MisterBrrown 7 жыл бұрын
Gamerz The Box LOL
@varunv5237
@varunv5237 4 жыл бұрын
I love this video style! It makes things so much more intuitive. I hope you continue uploading such videos
@justinanderson2132
@justinanderson2132 4 жыл бұрын
Hi, something seems off about the proof in the video - at the start you said that there are 3 things needed for cloning: 1) the original object (O) 2) the materials that comprise the object (M) 3) cloning process (C) But the proof only considers O and C (as a function of O), while it should be O, M and C (as a function of O and M). Cloning shouldn't be C(O)=OxO but C(OxM)=OxO. If O exists in superposition as O1+O2 then cloning would be C((O1+O2)xM)=(O1+O2)x(O1+O2). We then need to examine the cloning process for O1 and O2, however the materials needed for cloning O1, O2 and O might be different. Let's say M1 is the materials for cloning O1 and M2 is the materials for cloning O2, so the materials needed for cloning O=O1+O2 are M=M1+M2. C(O1xM1)=O1xO1,C(O2xM2)=O2xO2 O1xO1+O2xO2+O1xO2+O2xO1=(O1+O2)x(O1+O2)=OxO=C(OxM)=C((O1+O2)x(M1+M2))=C(O1xM1)+C(O1xM2)+C(O2xM1)+C(O2xM2)=O1xO1+O2xO2+C(O1xM2)+C(O2xM1) So the process could exist so long as O1xO2+O2xO1=C(O1xM2)+C(O2xM1). Consider for example the trivial solution where M=O and cloning is an empty action. PS - great videos, learned a lot from them.
@itsnotme7868
@itsnotme7868 4 жыл бұрын
He didn't take C(O)....but took the hypothetical end product as a function of O
@justinanderson2132
@justinanderson2132 4 жыл бұрын
@@itsnotme7868 I'm not sure I understand you mate. If C is the cloning process as a function of O, then the end product would be C(O)=OxO. And regardless as I've stated in my previous comment I think the proof is lacking M to truly prove anything meaningful. Without M all that is proven is that there is no process that can take an object O and turn it into 2 of the same object OxO - which I would think is already covered by conservation of matter.
@justinanderson2132
@justinanderson2132 3 жыл бұрын
@Danamo999 Sorry, I'm a year out of context so I might be missing something obvious. "C(O1xM2) is only defined if M2 is the materials to clone O1" - why would that be the case? The only thing we know about the process C is that given an object O/O1/O2 and the materials needed to reproduce it M/M1/M2, the process results in 2 objects O/O1/O2 and under these conditions C would be cloning. We know nothing about what process C does given an object O1 and the materials M2. Imagine a trivial example where C is an empty action - it does absolutely nothing. And the materials M to reproduce an object O are the object itself, M=O. Let's say O is a cat, O1 is a dead cat and O2 is a living cat, O=O1+O2. The materials to reproduce a cat O is another cat exactly like it M=O. The materials to reproduce a dead cat is another dead cat just like it M1=O1, the materials to reproduce a living cat is a living cat just like it M2=O2. You put a dead cat O1 in a box together with another dead cat M1=O1, then open the box and have 2 dead cats O1. You've successfully (though trivially) cloned a dead cat. You put a dead cat O1 in a box together with a living cat M2=O2/=O1, then open the box and find a living cat O2 and a dead cat O1. Is the process C of doing nothing to the objects inside perfectly defined? Yes. Does it successfully clone an object given the right materials? Yes. Must the materials M1 for producing a dead cat O1 be the same as the materials M2 for producing a living cat O2? No. Will the process successfully clone an object given the wrong materials? No. But then again it's not supposed to.
@prof.reuniclus21
@prof.reuniclus21 Жыл бұрын
math class: 2+2 you close your eyes math class:
@febinthomas1133
@febinthomas1133 Жыл бұрын
I know I am 3 years late but for cloning to be possible the cloning transformation should distribute. So, C((O1+O2)×M) = C(O1×M + O2×M) must be equal to C(O1×M) + C(O2×M) for cloning to be possible. But since (O1+O2)×(O1+O2) is not equal to O1×O1+O2×O2, cloning shouldn't be possible right?
@rkiwtir1146
@rkiwtir1146 7 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't mind a hourphysics video!
@karthikk1172
@karthikk1172 7 жыл бұрын
Ritwik Sharma apparently people would...
@nathanlim5421
@nathanlim5421 7 жыл бұрын
that is such a mean/racist comment
@essentialdang
@essentialdang 7 жыл бұрын
Go back to your hick country your racist hillbilly pleb
@essentialdang
@essentialdang 7 жыл бұрын
Yeah, hillbilly land
@matthewkennedy1329
@matthewkennedy1329 7 жыл бұрын
I don't see any rascism.
@dylangibson2943
@dylangibson2943 7 жыл бұрын
I am in a superposition of both liking these videos and really liking these videos.
@huhneat1076
@huhneat1076 6 жыл бұрын
I'm in a super position of not writing this comment and writing this co- Dang it, you just had to observe me, not I'm not cool. ):
@robertodelier9999
@robertodelier9999 5 жыл бұрын
me neither :v
@Rudxain
@Rudxain 2 жыл бұрын
If the phase of the wavefunctions are offsef by 1 Pi rad, their sum is cancelled out by destructive interference. So you no longer like the videos. Unless both WFs are in the same (or similar) phase
@sineowl443
@sineowl443 2 жыл бұрын
@@Rudxain wut?
@agustinp.montero1434
@agustinp.montero1434 6 жыл бұрын
Extremely clear and positive! Very good explanation of concepts with very simple mathematical derivations. It leaves several points worth discussing further, but that might be a debate for another day. Thanks a lot for this video and for your channel!
@funky555
@funky555 5 жыл бұрын
Well there's goes my only chance I get to a friend
@theman389
@theman389 4 жыл бұрын
FunkyPlayz makes me sad :(
@himagnamukherjee9382
@himagnamukherjee9382 3 жыл бұрын
bold of you to assume that you'd hang out with you.
@BariumCobaltNitrog3n
@BariumCobaltNitrog3n 3 жыл бұрын
*there
@simoneangeliquemaloney3990
@simoneangeliquemaloney3990 3 жыл бұрын
Damn dude... you good
@funky555
@funky555 3 жыл бұрын
@@simoneangeliquemaloney3990 naw
@hxhxhgfd
@hxhxhgfd 7 жыл бұрын
So it IS feasibly possible for two things in the universe to be exactly the same, just not for us to make exact copies of something that there's only one of in existence. This brings to light an interesting concept concerning consciousness. Suppose that the universe is spatially infinite. Also, suppose that the number of types of particles that exist in the universe is finite. On top of that, assume that there's only a certain number of ways to arrange those particles that complies with known physical law, and that those particles can only exist in a finite number of states. As such, if space is infinite, that would mean that, if you go far enough in any direction, you'll eventually run across an exact copy of the place you just left. So, if you left earth, then eventually you'd run across an exact replica of earth. Down to the people on it. Down to the arrangement of the neurons in those peoples' brains. Down to the properties of the sodium and potassium ions in those brains. And not only would there be one exact copy. If space were infinite, there would be an infinite number of exact copies. Now, as far as we know of today, there is no mystical aspect of consciousness that determines its properties. You are you simply because your brain is arranged a certain way, and your neurons are firing in a particular pattern that is unique to you. But here's the catch - if there were to exist an exact copy of you, down to the position of the neurons and the arrangement of the neural activity, then which "you" would you be? Which head would you reside in? What would differentiate your mind from the mind of the other you? Assuming that they truly were an exact copy, then nothing at all would differentiate the two of you. Now, if you two were to be in the same location and interacting with each other, then it could be determined which "you" was you, as the very act of interacting would break the symmetry. The other "you" would respond to your gestures, therefore altering his neural state in a way that's unique from yours. But, if the two of you were to forever remain isolated in your little bubbles, then you could conceivably reside in both heads at once. And, if there's an infinite number of "you's" out there, then you'd reside in all of their heads at once. And, since they'd all be exact copies, then they'd all be experiencing and doing the same thing simultaneously. So there wouldn't be any way for you to differentiate between the copies. In short, your mind could be simultaneously existing in an infinite number of locations at once. You simply don't know because each location is an exact copy of the other, so you get the exact same sensory input and experience the exact same responses to that input at every location. What's more, let's assume that every copy of you suddenly became curious and said "I want to find this supposed replica-world." Afterwards, they all set out in their collective high-tech spacecraft in a random direction, intent on traveling until they run across the replica-earth. Now, let's say that after an arbitrarily long amount of time (assuming that you could somehow do it before the universe suffered heat death) you finally run across this replica world. Here's the kicker. The "you" of this world would've left long ago, at the exact moment YOU decided to leave, in search of this mysterious "replica-world" he thought of. That means that, from the perspective of the people that inhabit that world, "you" set off in one direction, bound for a replica-world, but instead simply returned to your own world, coming from the opposite direction. From their perspective, you simply would've circled the entire universe, then come back around. And the crazy thing is that, from your perspective, this would be a perfectly reasonable explanation as well, as you'd never run in to any copy of you, and there would be no way of differentiating the earth you find from the earth you left behind. Similarly, a copy of you would show up on the earth you left, which the people on that world would assume was you after having circled the entire universe. So is there really any difference between a universe with an infinite number of "you"s and "earth"s, and a universe that curves in on itself?
@ZaidAlOmari
@ZaidAlOmari 7 жыл бұрын
Ethan d Interesting to read :) seriously, but the assumption that "space is infinite" is not correct. so there is no replica of earth to be found, because the universe is really TINY! to have such exact replica !!
@raffaeldavila1305
@raffaeldavila1305 7 жыл бұрын
Zaid Al-Omari He did say "suppose"
@ZaidAlOmari
@ZaidAlOmari 7 жыл бұрын
Raffael Davila excuse me i am not native english speaker, I thought "suppose" means that he is trying to use the logical argument "Prove by Contradiction". so i thought he tried to make an assumption then prove its true.
@ZaidAlOmari
@ZaidAlOmari 7 жыл бұрын
Quantum Woo yes thats why I disagreed.
@thejedimaster32
@thejedimaster32 7 жыл бұрын
holy shit that was really interesting to read... kind of mind-bending
@Krysmand
@Krysmand 7 жыл бұрын
The long format is really good. CGP Grey +
@Sam-oz8pn
@Sam-oz8pn 7 жыл бұрын
krysman I noticed too! There should be a CGP Grey emoji
@user-cc8dw9tf9z
@user-cc8dw9tf9z 5 ай бұрын
OMG ! I just loved how creatively you explained one of the most confusing things ever and made it look so look!! looking forward for more such videos
@Brunograffer
@Brunograffer 5 жыл бұрын
You draw well ! And so your explainations are so cool and understandable 👌🏼 Thank you !
@CarlosRios1
@CarlosRios1 7 жыл бұрын
I liked the CGP Grey reference.
@Enden31
@Enden31 7 жыл бұрын
glad i am not the only one to notice :)
@zacchon
@zacchon 7 жыл бұрын
7:34 Is that about some particular comment of Grey's or just about Grey in general?
@DJZiiWi
@DJZiiWi 7 жыл бұрын
It's a recurring theme in Grey and Brady Haran's Podcast, Hello Internet.
@dov36Kaizo
@dov36Kaizo 7 жыл бұрын
10 minutes of Minute Physics, hell yeah!
@Locane256
@Locane256 4 жыл бұрын
Neat! I re-found your channel after rewatching the video you did with Hank Green, so youtube started suggesting you again. I loved the fact that you brought up (star trek!! :D) teleporters, because that's exactly where my brain was when I was watching the rest of the video.
@quantumbracket6995
@quantumbracket6995 4 жыл бұрын
for some reason I readed 'the no cleaning' theorem and came here expecting a excuse to give to my mom
@smashedvlogs
@smashedvlogs 4 жыл бұрын
quantum bracket you sound a little to young to grasp the concept of quantum physics,
@MaoDev
@MaoDev 4 жыл бұрын
@@Satheo05 Yes indeed, how old? The answer is it doesn't matter as long as you can understand it.
@MaoDev
@MaoDev 4 жыл бұрын
@@Satheo05 Yeah, I know. I answered for him.
@MaoDev
@MaoDev 4 жыл бұрын
@@Satheo05 lol, fine
@Gositi
@Gositi 4 жыл бұрын
Lol
@mohdasyraf999
@mohdasyraf999 7 жыл бұрын
My brain just exploded plus not exploded = exploded² + not exploded² = A²+2AB+B²
@zinns
@zinns 7 жыл бұрын
Mohd Asyraf or (A+B)^2
@TrackMastersCupSeries
@TrackMastersCupSeries 7 жыл бұрын
Agreed.
@theenbgender
@theenbgender 6 жыл бұрын
Mohd Asyraf I don't know why I'm pretending to understand quantum mechanics or physics or whatever
@thankyouand3260
@thankyouand3260 6 жыл бұрын
Haha awesome too awesome answer
@sahildoshi5247
@sahildoshi5247 6 жыл бұрын
actually it should be (exploded +not exploded)^2=A^2+2AB+B^2 dumb ass learn some algebra
@Vicioussama
@Vicioussama 7 жыл бұрын
Really love this more in depth video :)
@giomjava
@giomjava 7 жыл бұрын
The God Emperor same here!
@fiseticamente
@fiseticamente 5 жыл бұрын
This video is brilliant! perfect illustrations to get insights on eigenvalues and eiegenstates in ket notation 👌 Longer videos are the way to go!!!
@alihasanzadeh2692
@alihasanzadeh2692 6 жыл бұрын
A great video, while keeping it simple, staying informative. Great job man! I really enjoyed it. Please consider more quantum mechanics based videos. Thank you
@freblox812
@freblox812 Жыл бұрын
"simple" :)
@MC-mx1mt
@MC-mx1mt 8 ай бұрын
​@@freblox812it is simple lol
@TheLordHighNoob
@TheLordHighNoob 7 жыл бұрын
A 10 minute video! What is this? Christmas?
@TheLordHighNoob
@TheLordHighNoob 7 жыл бұрын
*Looks at Calender* *Feels dumb*
@ruinenlust_
@ruinenlust_ 7 жыл бұрын
*Looks at the length* It's just over 10 minutes so they make more money.
@user-dx4rx3bt2l
@user-dx4rx3bt2l 7 жыл бұрын
They haven't put any mid roll adds though, so they aren't actually making more money
@TheLordHighNoob
@TheLordHighNoob 7 жыл бұрын
I LOVE THE SHERLOCK REFERENCE. YOU ARE BECOME THE NEW EMPEROR OF TUMBLR. ALL HAIL EMMA L!
@BULLSHXTYT
@BULLSHXTYT 7 жыл бұрын
10 minutes that I can only understand 10 seconds
@Schaibs11
@Schaibs11 7 жыл бұрын
"I'm trying a new format" a.k.a. KZfaq formula forcing content creators to make a video 10 minutes long.
@icebluscorpion
@icebluscorpion 3 жыл бұрын
I liked this video a lot the ad is placed right and it was worth to put my time watching it. great job I hope the up coming videos are as great as this one did
@malvikachaudhary
@malvikachaudhary 3 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate the way of explanation on this channel. Got to learn a lot from here.. thanks!
@FishCantRoll
@FishCantRoll 7 жыл бұрын
10minutesphysics*
@MuradBeybalaev
@MuradBeybalaev 6 жыл бұрын
It's an adjective, not a noun. minute (adjective) [mahy-noot, -nyoot, mi-] 1. extremely small, as in size, amount, extent, or degree: minute differences. 2. of minor importance; insignificant; trifling. 3. attentive to or concerned with even the smallest details: a minute examination.
@captaincygni2162
@captaincygni2162 6 жыл бұрын
Murad Beybalaev It *is also a noun minute ˈmɪnɪt noun noun: minute; plural noun: minutes; noun: arc minute; plural noun: arc minutes; noun: minute of arc; plural noun: minutes of arc 1. a period of time equal to sixty seconds or a sixtieth of an hour. "we waited for twenty minutes" the distance covered in a minute by someone driving or walking. "the hotel is situated just ten minutes from the centre of the resort" informal a very short time. "come and sit down for a minute" synonyms: moment, short time, little while, second, bit, instant; More informalsec, nanosecond, jiffy, jiff; informaltick, mo, two ticks "it'll only take a minute" a point in time. "she was laughing one minute and crying the next" synonyms: point in time, point, moment, instant, time, juncture, stage "at that minute, Tony walked in" 2. a sixtieth of a degree of angular measurement (symbol: ʹ). "Delta Lyrae is a double star with a separation of over 10 minutes of arc" Dipshit (sorry in advance if it was a joke)
@caharkness
@caharkness 6 жыл бұрын
or 10x the minutephysics.
@gabep3132
@gabep3132 6 жыл бұрын
Captain Cygni I believe he was referring to the context in which it was used, not the word as a whole. Yes, it is a noun, but the minute used in the channel name is not a noun. As in, it’s not used as a noun.
@TT-zi5st
@TT-zi5st 5 жыл бұрын
Conveniently just past the 10min advert money split too. Which means he artificially lengthened the video to get more money.
@011azr
@011azr 7 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one who likes to pretend that I understand what these kinds of video are really about?
@pedrocorrea9048
@pedrocorrea9048 7 жыл бұрын
jkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk i laughed
@brian_cream
@brian_cream 7 жыл бұрын
i don't pretend you dingler tingler
@boltstrikes429
@boltstrikes429 7 жыл бұрын
nope.
@Darqoni
@Darqoni 7 жыл бұрын
simply watching it doesn't work because most of these terms and examples are unknown to me so before I understand this I'dd have to research a lot more basic stuff..
@brian_cream
@brian_cream 7 жыл бұрын
even if you don't exactly know what those terms mean you can get a pretty good idea of what they represent in this context. But you have a point it took me a while to completely understand this video but that's probably because i'm 14 and i had no clue about quantum mechanics
@geminigoal3085
@geminigoal3085 Жыл бұрын
This is the best video I have seen ever!!!!!! All the conepts are made clear along with the basics needed to understand that concept. Please make more !!!!!
@sinanaltinova4201
@sinanaltinova4201 6 жыл бұрын
Daim you explain such complex topic so easy to follow and get the gist of
@jamesweaver6741
@jamesweaver6741 7 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favourite videos you've done!! A ton of clear and logical explanation that is also relatable. I'm so up for more like this. Thanks!!
@trobinson9342
@trobinson9342 7 жыл бұрын
Love the longer videos!
@ampjam
@ampjam 7 жыл бұрын
I Agree, but longer videos means less frequent videos because of the time and effort but into them, so maybe some shorter videos wrinkled in with the longer ones?
@jamchiroptera4258
@jamchiroptera4258 6 жыл бұрын
Psh, you just need a Heisenberg compensator
@unspeci8852
@unspeci8852 6 жыл бұрын
Silly Star Trek
@danielaguilarlopez7254
@danielaguilarlopez7254 4 жыл бұрын
If only it where that easy
@d0lllz477
@d0lllz477 7 жыл бұрын
I've only studied physics through highschool but i've always been interested in the whole magic of it and this channel is the only place i can get my share of mind blowing physics pieces that are actually fun. Keep up the great work. I absolutely love the videos ❤ And it didn't feel longer at all.
@mancheaseskrelpher8419
@mancheaseskrelpher8419 7 жыл бұрын
Likely my favorite MinutePhysics video so far. It's in depth enough for me to feel that I fully grasp the topic, but not swallowing over half an hour of my time. Great work!
@Weird_Quests
@Weird_Quests 6 жыл бұрын
Great content - really inspiring me to learn more about science, as well as inspiring ideas for my sci-fi fiction
@benjamintangen8838
@benjamintangen8838 4 жыл бұрын
10-15 minutes videos is perfect, but rather shorter than longer, because you have topics that demands attention all the way through the video! Really liked it the length of this video, Keep going with that 😉
@endsu
@endsu 7 жыл бұрын
longer videos = more money for u + more time to learn(for us viewers)so... everybody wins!
@MaoDev
@MaoDev 4 жыл бұрын
No, not really... This video had no ad put by google therefore he made no money out of it. Of course, there are people who donate and he himself can promote some products, but the length of the video is not a factor for making more money.
@nebula3576
@nebula3576 4 жыл бұрын
@@MaoDev and the sad thing about youtubr comments is nobody ever replies. Hell he probably wont even see this comment...will you see this comment? The world will never know. I wish KZfaq comments were more like reddit where you actually get replies decently fast
@lofianorak8013
@lofianorak8013 4 жыл бұрын
No, fuck this channel it fucking sux. He never explains anything well
@kanjakan
@kanjakan 3 жыл бұрын
@@lofianorak8013 He explained pretty well in this video, though.
@derstreber2
@derstreber2 7 жыл бұрын
and even if this cloning was possible, one second later, both the clone and the original would be exposed to different stimuli, this would make them diverge.
@hisoka44444444
@hisoka44444444 4 жыл бұрын
It was a great video, long format also good! Keep it up :)
@drunemeton
@drunemeton Жыл бұрын
Love the longer format!
@TrustyPumpkin
@TrustyPumpkin 7 жыл бұрын
I really enjoy the longer format videos. Been watching for years. You can get in way more depth and i don't feel like it takes away what you were originally trying to do with the channel. Like you said, Minute Physics was meant to signify a video on the magnitude from 1 to 10 minutes
@DrBuffaloBalls
@DrBuffaloBalls 7 жыл бұрын
Henry has discovered the KZfaq algorithm.
@Alkaloid-Odin
@Alkaloid-Odin 7 жыл бұрын
DrBuffaloBalls hahahahahah
@steveblanmag7410
@steveblanmag7410 3 жыл бұрын
Henry. I love your videos. Keep doin' what you do.
@maxsagibgareev
@maxsagibgareev 7 жыл бұрын
Man, you are just amazing at explaining! Thank you for showing that my teleportation efforts won't be wasted. Please, give us more!
@Ikiguyy
@Ikiguyy 7 жыл бұрын
u know something is confusing when u hear quantum.
@lilith5865
@lilith5865 6 жыл бұрын
nuka cola quantum
@Quantum-yz9fc
@Quantum-yz9fc 6 жыл бұрын
When your username is Quantum but everything involving quantum confuses you.
@scenekid7493
@scenekid7493 5 жыл бұрын
@@Quantum-yz9fc lmao
@stefanocarini8117
@stefanocarini8117 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I did not get the explanation when I first read it on my textbook but now I've got a clearer picture
@leoyang1.618
@leoyang1.618 4 жыл бұрын
Great Video! The explanation was clear and in depth!
@aidanmaley9826
@aidanmaley9826 7 жыл бұрын
That would be funny if the matrix exists and we're trying to make sense of physics when that's not even the real physics. Then we wake up and everything is fucked up and doesn't make sense to us because the rules of everything fundamental that we know are different. o_O
@alexanderherzog3064
@alexanderherzog3064 7 жыл бұрын
Aidan Maley I've thought of that before too
@samberg3864
@samberg3864 7 жыл бұрын
You might be interesting in reading about cartesian or academic skepticism.
@ganondorfchampin
@ganondorfchampin 7 жыл бұрын
That why pragmatism is the best approach to science. Who cares about the metaphysics, just do the thing.
@triggerdpersond5156
@triggerdpersond5156 7 жыл бұрын
what if gravity pushed you away instead of pulling you
@KyuubiSam
@KyuubiSam 7 жыл бұрын
Mr Slayz, LMFAO the most powerful known psychedelic substance is DMT, and it's not really "where we go" but more of "what gets opened up to us in terms of perception" since it's a conscious/subconscious journey, not a physical one.
@TheGurumash
@TheGurumash 7 жыл бұрын
I like how you used CGP Grey's Icon when talking about an ideal future.
@kevon217
@kevon217 2 жыл бұрын
Great video and well explained! I did have to slow it down some to follow at a good pace.
@The0rnate
@The0rnate 5 жыл бұрын
I liked that CGP Grey plug haha. Mind stretching videos. Enjoyed per usual. :)
@sourcecode991
@sourcecode991 7 жыл бұрын
Finally a minute physic video where I knew the concept before the video, now I can die in peace. Also 10-15 min video > short video and
@glacier4286
@glacier4286 7 жыл бұрын
Soo, if a teleporter breaks my atoms down and reassembles me it actually will still be my own conscious self on the destination, and not just a clone with the exact same personality?
@glacier4286
@glacier4286 7 жыл бұрын
Pincsi01 Pfft, wow, you cut me deep.
@JonMascar
@JonMascar 7 жыл бұрын
Dual Wield We still don't know if consciousness is purely the result of the matter that makes us up and it's unique arrangement. It could be something inconceivable as nature has had 4.5 billion years to shape a being as advanced as us. We, as a bunch of atoms, understand that we are atoms and can grasp amazing concepts like our place and purpose in the universe. Then again, what is consciousness and does it really exist. How can you know if you have the awareness that you are having your own thoughts and are not just programmed or destined based on your biochemistry to do what you do? These are perplexing questions I hope we can shed some light on in the coming century, especially with the arrival of artificial intelligence that pass the Turing Test with flying colors. Could we reach the point where beings we create in simulation actually perceive their world in the same way as we do. Is it ethical to create a conscious creature to serve our will? It would be like slavery. Or we couldn't really tell if the robots actually 'felt' anything on a emotional level. Mind-boggling stuff, truly.
@NoConsequenc3
@NoConsequenc3 7 жыл бұрын
of course it's not "you" because "you" exist right NOW now "you" are something newer, and by the time "you" finish reading this BAM "you" are something newer, and by the time "you" finish reading this BAM "you" are something newer, and by the time "you" finish reading this BAM "you" are something newer, and by the time "you" finish reading this BAM "you" are something newer, and by the time "you" finish reading this BAM "you" are something newer, and by the time "you" finish reading this Point being - fear of teleportation, and by extension death itself, is completely silly. The idea of a constant identity and "self" is illusory in the first place, "you" die all the time.
@MentalVideographer
@MentalVideographer 7 жыл бұрын
It's a bit like the thought that you could potentially not exist in time. You could be frozen in an instant, with only the feelings you presently have suggesting that there was something before. Of course, each instant you remember tells you that at that moment it was not the case, but it wouldn't even have to exist. It's a bit odd.
@michaelmcginnis1429
@michaelmcginnis1429 7 жыл бұрын
It depends on what you consider "you." If the most fundamental thing that makes you "you" is your conscientiousness, then you'd have to find out if the most fundamental thing that makes you conscientious is chemical bonds and neurons firing in your brain. If that's the case, teleportation is possible because there is no physical law preventing an advance in technology that can measure chemical bonds and neurons. If the most fundamental thing that makes up conscientiousness is at the quantum level of the subatomic particles that make up your brain, then teleportation of exactly "you" is not possible because the act of measuring at the quantum level changes the particle or energy level of the particle being measured. At that point, you have to ask yourself, am I really going to change THAT much by teleporting? Right now, no one can be sure because science has not advanced that far.
@sheetalkhandelwal8755
@sheetalkhandelwal8755 5 жыл бұрын
your KZfaq channel is very good i can understand everything and everything is accurately true
@shadowfaceanimated3641
@shadowfaceanimated3641 5 жыл бұрын
"more perfecter" -Henry Reich
@Merlin5007
@Merlin5007 7 жыл бұрын
I like the longer format. Please do more of them.
@plumeater1
@plumeater1 7 жыл бұрын
MinutePhysics is becoming HourPhysics.
@j.laffety328
@j.laffety328 7 жыл бұрын
Only to hit the 10 min mark for that SWEET AD REVENUE BABY!
@pom5221
@pom5221 7 жыл бұрын
Schmoorp Willakers i thought that was only with the old youtube? Did they bring it back? Was it never gone?
@j.laffety328
@j.laffety328 7 жыл бұрын
They brought it back i think
@ThegeekforlifeBlogspot
@ThegeekforlifeBlogspot 7 жыл бұрын
more like 10MinutesPhysics
@davidwright8432
@davidwright8432 5 жыл бұрын
Really, it's clarity of explanatin that's more imprtant than 'proper time' video length. So a longer video, with the same clarityh as you give, would be ... more infrmative! Thhis is a Good Thing!
@EricEsser
@EricEsser 6 жыл бұрын
TIL: I am a superposition of knowing what the hell you’re talking about and not knowing what the hell you’re talking about.
@ItsaJuraff
@ItsaJuraff 7 жыл бұрын
I am happy as long as we can still teleport stuff.
@upsidedown5763
@upsidedown5763 6 жыл бұрын
Willdabeast we can’t teleport. There was a whole theory but basically when something disappeared from a place, the sound waves would move way too fast and I would basically make a really loud sound that would make everyone around deaf (something like that)
@EndranExit
@EndranExit 6 жыл бұрын
how about teleporting bread ?
@upsidedown5763
@upsidedown5763 6 жыл бұрын
EndranExit i have no idea
@pauldeddens5349
@pauldeddens5349 6 жыл бұрын
we can teleport via quantum entanglement but who wants to teleport the possibility of a dead cat?
@LS-oh8kv
@LS-oh8kv 6 жыл бұрын
We can teleport, a while back they teleported particles from I think England to France instantaneously through quantum entanglement, but if we were to teleport humans we would have to rip away every atom from our bodies and entangle it, and then reconstruct our bodies atom by atom, and then there’s the question of even if all the atoms are the same, is it still us? Is consciousness a simple matter of atoms? Or something we don’t yet understand?
@readyrepairs
@readyrepairs 7 жыл бұрын
that feeling when people think that Schrodingers Cat wasnt a joke, and that things can be in multiple states at once - when the fact is they cant - we just arent capable of knowing which state they are in until we measure them and determine which state they are in , so we have to make the assumption prior to measuring that they could be in either state and so must assume it could be both. My face when people will try to say I am wrong because they have a shirt with a picture of a cat that is alive and dead on it - and dont actually understand what I am saying.
@SpeakShibboleth
@SpeakShibboleth 7 жыл бұрын
readyrepairs well, yes and no. it's not exactly a joke because it does happen to elementary particles, just not macroscopic objects like cats.
@readyrepairs
@readyrepairs 7 жыл бұрын
sorry - youre wrong. schrodingers cat was a joke between two people smarter than both of us - who were both intelligent enough to know that 1 thing cannot be two different things at the same time, but also knew that we couldnt know which it was - without destroying it by measuring it - and thus calculations had to allow for it to be either at the same time. Enjoy your neat shirt tho, im sure a couple dumb blondes will LOL at it.
@readyrepairs
@readyrepairs 7 жыл бұрын
***** no - it doesnt. There are no particles or other things, features or etc - that can be in two places at one time - otherwise they would be two different things. It is literally just a fact that we cant know which place they are in, so we have to handle them in our math as a range of possibilities instead of a finite number/measurement.
@SpeakShibboleth
@SpeakShibboleth 7 жыл бұрын
readyrepairs I think you are mixed up between the uncertainty principle and three principle of superposition. The fact that a particle is in a superposition of two states doesn't mean that it's in two places at once. Read some more about what these things actually mean. It's actually pretty interesting.
@uhohhotdog
@uhohhotdog 7 жыл бұрын
Schrödinger's cat may have been a joke but superposition is a real thing
@trainhxiiids
@trainhxiiids 6 жыл бұрын
I did very much enjoy this video. Would love to see more
@alyo7774
@alyo7774 5 жыл бұрын
That was amazing. Of course, watching this video might be just a scratch on real understanding of no cloning theorem, but it was very carefully explained.
@ProbablyLies
@ProbablyLies 7 жыл бұрын
minute physics was about taking something complex and making it bite sized and easy to understand. 10 minutes of super positions, quantum mechanics, uncertainty principles etc might just be too much
@curiouscatlearns
@curiouscatlearns 7 жыл бұрын
something as complex as quantum mechanics explained in 10 minutes is still quite succinct. 10 minutes is still quite bite sized for a dish like physics.
@GrandMoffTarkinsTeaDispenser
@GrandMoffTarkinsTeaDispenser 7 жыл бұрын
Sir Big Balls Are you kdding me this was extremely simple to understand, it was as dumbed down as possible.
@MrHSX
@MrHSX 7 жыл бұрын
Wow, a 10-min video?! It is like it's Christmas again!
@kellyrunnels5684
@kellyrunnels5684 2 жыл бұрын
great video! love the videos about quantum mechanics!
@augusteaston-calabria2422
@augusteaston-calabria2422 5 жыл бұрын
I love the detail!!! Thank you!
@souravzzz
@souravzzz 7 жыл бұрын
What if the act of cloning is equivalent to an act of observation, which causes the superposition/wave function to collapse to a single state?
@RRRaiken
@RRRaiken 7 жыл бұрын
You can't just leave out or reduce information and still call it a perfect copy
@Kasseenzettel
@Kasseenzettel 7 жыл бұрын
But then both the original and the copy would have their superposition collapsed so... how exactly would that not be a perfect copy still? I also fail to see how any remotely real cloning apparatus could possibly NOT act as an observation and therefor throw out quantum mechanics in its entirety, rendering this whole equation mood, no?
@RRRaiken
@RRRaiken 7 жыл бұрын
I think what the Observer Effect describes is that the act of observation will alter the state of the subject, so even though wave function collapses, the original object will experience change so it will not be a perfect copy... I could be wrong but I think using act of observation will result in an "Ok clone" mentioned in the video
@Kasseenzettel
@Kasseenzettel 7 жыл бұрын
Chauncey 钟离 Hm. If you were to sort of "scan" the object and then clone it, I'm pretty sure you'd get a perfect copy. Now... I'll grant you though, by scanning the object I guess you did change it and so it's not really the actual original anymore, right? Like, by scanning the box we already determined whether or not the cat is alive. So while the original box had an "undead" cat, the scanned original has either or. And so does the clone, making it a perfect copy of the new original. But yea, I guess we did change the original first in this case so I suppose in that way it's not a perfect copy :/ Oh well, I'm just thinking out loud anyway, I don't actually understand this stuff :D
@WeAreGRID
@WeAreGRID 7 жыл бұрын
the act of cloning IS an act of observation, for a machine to make a copy of whatever is in a box, it needs to know what is in the box. you can only get exploded gunpowder or unexploded gunpowder out of the machine, because only A or B went IN to the machine, we just didnt know what went into it. We would get exactly whatever went in, but it would be a copy of the observed particles.
@SammytheSnail
@SammytheSnail 7 жыл бұрын
Love this in depth explanation man definitely keeping this as a reference for the future
@humanatee6639
@humanatee6639 5 жыл бұрын
9:26rip stickman-clone pixelated to death.
@Sef_Era
@Sef_Era 5 жыл бұрын
7:42 Look-It! CGPgrey! Two of my favorite explanatory YT channels in one place. Get Fact Fiend here, that’d be all three...
@stefanbraham9902
@stefanbraham9902 6 жыл бұрын
Love the longer format (and the sly CGPGrey reference)!
@ToxicJassassin
@ToxicJassassin 6 жыл бұрын
3Blue1Brown is very underrated
@bobpickering1
@bobpickering1 Жыл бұрын
Love your videos. One suggestion. I’m old enough that my hearing isn’t as good as it once was. Background music, especially with higher frequencies and volume, makes it harder to understand what you’re saying. However, I really love the string bass you often use, and it doesn’t interfere with your message.
@aleksitjvladica.
@aleksitjvladica. 4 жыл бұрын
That's exactly how I would tell! Wow, I'm impressed by level of exactliness!
@micahgruenwald9321
@micahgruenwald9321 7 жыл бұрын
The long format is really good, the short ones seemed rushed anyways
@daniellasullivan6398
@daniellasullivan6398 7 жыл бұрын
Really appreciate your using Dirac notation and using actual mathematical theorems in the video :) Makes it more accurate while still accessible.
@ignacysamborski7001
@ignacysamborski7001 3 жыл бұрын
It’s 10^100^100 % ok to have longer videos Do keep them coming 👍
@hotlavatube
@hotlavatube Жыл бұрын
I'm suddenly reminded of Terry Pratchett's "Going Postal" which had the mail sorting engine that tapped into the space-time continuum and emitted mail from the future, mail from alternate universes, and notes people swore they had written and posted but never did.
@GustavoCiacco
@GustavoCiacco 7 жыл бұрын
Great! I really liked this long format video!
@BernardoPatino
@BernardoPatino 7 жыл бұрын
I was gonna make a joke about cloning, but someone might copy it.
@Blox117
@Blox117 7 жыл бұрын
I was gonna make a joke about cloning, but someone might copy it.
@xenom1592
@xenom1592 7 жыл бұрын
+Blox117 I was gonna make a joke about cloning, but someone might copy it.
@lehnrik
@lehnrik 7 жыл бұрын
I was gonna make a coke about ploning, but someone might jocy it.
@davidmarmora2217
@davidmarmora2217 3 жыл бұрын
Love this video... yes you should do more like this one!!!
@addictivealternatives
@addictivealternatives 6 жыл бұрын
I like the long video, I’m hyped for that conscious video too now xd
@Platinum_Tugboat
@Platinum_Tugboat 7 жыл бұрын
im not afraid to admit that this went over my head... maybe it's because i havent had coffee yet. lol
@MarcelNL
@MarcelNL 7 жыл бұрын
I really love science, but the pace of this channel is so fast that one minute really is perfect. For such long videos they really should take it easier so the information can settle in a bit. The old videos were really simple to understand even after a few beers. This one is hard to follow even when you're sober. I watch these videos just to enjoy myself and sometimes to learn a little bit (although I already know most of the stuff that's mentioned on this channel up to a certain degree). I stopped this video after 5,5 minute.
@Platinum_Tugboat
@Platinum_Tugboat 7 жыл бұрын
Marcel I like the way you put that, it makes sense. I agree that the older videos were simply put (so to speak) so that a wider general audience would be able to understand.
@Sinehmatic
@Sinehmatic 7 жыл бұрын
What, you don't understand how to multiply something that isn't a number by something else that isn't a number?
@MarcelNL
@MarcelNL 7 жыл бұрын
***** I do understand, but the general pace is just too fast for a clip of this length. It's not just specifically this single subject at that point of the clip.
@velocityra
@velocityra 7 жыл бұрын
His older videos were commonly also about much simpler subjects. There's a limit to how much you can simplify a topic before it becomes _too_ dumbed down/incorrect.
@infi44
@infi44 7 жыл бұрын
I liked the mathematical explanation part . Keep it up! MinutePhysics Rox!
@kevinscott7292
@kevinscott7292 4 жыл бұрын
I honestly thought this video was only one minute long when I got to the end. Well done.
@mrsuperguy2073
@mrsuperguy2073 5 жыл бұрын
I love how this principle neatly solves the problem of teleportation that says, if teleportation involves copying you and placing that copy in some destination then the destination you is only a copy. And what's more, you could leave the original behind and not destroy it meaning there's 2 of you. So which is the real one. This principle says that that's not possible and that whichever one is identical at the quantum level to you before the teleportation is the real one.
@YYYValentine
@YYYValentine 7 жыл бұрын
I definetly vote for the LONGER videos!!!
@karangarg4631
@karangarg4631 7 жыл бұрын
That moment when you thought you were good at maths, lmao no
@hasan7275
@hasan7275 6 жыл бұрын
Are you in third grade?
@FranklinYu
@FranklinYu 6 жыл бұрын
Not that easy. |A> and |B> is actually functions (or wave functions), and the rule of addition and multiplication is not exactly the same as numbers (that we learn in fourth grade).
How to Teleport Schrödinger's Cat
14:13
minutephysics
Рет қаралды 2,6 МЛН
Bell's Theorem: The Quantum Venn Diagram Paradox
17:35
minutephysics
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Зу-зу Күлпәш. Агроном. (5-бөлім)
55:20
ASTANATV Movie
Рет қаралды 401 М.
Маленькая и средняя фанта
00:56
Multi DO Smile Russian
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
Stupid man 👨😂
00:20
Nadir Show
Рет қаралды 25 МЛН
Godzilla Attacks Brawl Stars!!!
00:39
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Legitimate Cold Fusion Exists | Muon-Catalyzed Fusion
6:28
minutephysics
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
Feynman's Lost Lecture (ft. 3Blue1Brown)
21:44
minutephysics
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
Time Travel in Fiction Rundown
8:05
minutephysics
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
How to Tell Matter From Antimatter | CP Violation & The Ozma Problem
5:02
The Banach-Tarski Paradox
24:14
Vsauce
Рет қаралды 43 МЛН
Is Anything on the Internet Real?
7:13
minutephysics
Рет қаралды 496 М.
The True Science of Parallel Universes
4:56
minutephysics
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Impossible Muons
4:34
minutephysics
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
The Unreasonable Efficiency of Black Holes
6:22
minutephysics
Рет қаралды 4,1 МЛН
Распаковал Xiaomi SU7
0:59
Wylsacom
Рет қаралды 2,7 МЛН
Я Создал Новый Айфон!
0:59
FLV
Рет қаралды 2,9 МЛН
Any Sound & Call Recording Option Amazing Keypad Mobile 📱
0:48
Tech Official
Рет қаралды 326 М.
Что еще за обходная зарядка?
0:30
Не шарю!
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
Vortex Cannon vs Drone
20:44
Mark Rober
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
САМЫЙ дешевый ПК с OZON на RTX 4070
16:16
Мой Компьютер
Рет қаралды 113 М.