Bravo. Just wow. You're an incredible teacher.

Smh can't believe they skipped the sequel ice 2 and went straight to ice 3

Why is there a microsecond flash shot of One Direction Where are We Tour at 0:04 ?

There is no paradox only to the person who is asking for one

Sunn o better watch out

Bro just put a camera in there… and we can see w/o opening the door & changing the quantum realm/space\time or whatever… And for your question at the end, GOD is

which laptop would be best for a ug physics student in 2024 ? Budget is around 800 to 1200 USD. Do i need to expand my budget to get a long lasting device ?

I imagine forces other than hydrogen bonding dominate in this other solid phase of ice, ice iii, since vanderwals and polar bonding are stronger when closer.

Still haven't seen one.

Hulk said it best changing the past doesn’t change the present

Sometimes I wonder if the universe is so mysterious because the fundamental reality underlying all existence is so alien to what our senses would have us believe. If so, it may be a long time before we can figure that one out, if ever. Though I like Max Tegmark's idea of the universe being fundamentally mathematical. Using the analogy of a video game, you have a list of possibilities and initial conditions described but the disc does not literally describe every outcome; the outcomes are an emergent property and maybe our universe and any other timeline are emergent too.

1:48 ∆x×∆P = h/2π Am I right?

Turkish subtitles please

Turkish subtitles please

Here's what I think about relativity. It's relative to something. And by that, I mean you have to measure it. The process of measuring is well explained by the Gaussian curb. And there is all the math involved with errors. You have multiple people doing measurements. And those people are let's say located in different parts of the world, affected by different gravitational forces. Or even electromagnetic, nuclear forces, who knows? They are affected, their equipment is affected, everything is under a certain interaction with the outside world. What one should expect to get is errors. Different errors, depending on many factors. And those errors are relative to the position of the observer. Measure light in one place, here you go, one set of errors. Measure it in another place, there you go, another set of errors. Keep measuring them and you will never get the errors to match, because the external conditions keep changing. That is why the universal gravitational constant will never be a constant. Because of the measuring errors. Do we assume it to be. Well... it kinda fits most computational models. Is it? Well... we can't know for sure, but we do have good approximations for it that fit pretty well our engineering models. So sure, why not? We can assume it to be. And from all the errors involved in measurements, you can get a model that says something like... Well... the probability of a certain phenomenon to be this strong here, based on the probability of errors occurring in such a given fashion, is this. And this goes something like this. There are gravitational waves emitted by the Sun. Waves of what? Well... probably bosons that travel to Earth in a wave like motion. And what do those bosons do? Well... some get attracted by other bodies and pull those bodies towards the Sun. Others pass by until they reach Earth. And then? Well... they create gravity. The earth gets pulled towards the Sun. And how many bosons do reach Earth? Well... assuming the Sun is composed of 10^57 (rougly estimated) atoms that emit these many particles, we can assume that a number of... that many bosons end up on Earth and form gravity. And those estimations have to be of a statistical nature, because you can't actually predict what will happen to them during the way. But because in order to determine the number of atoms in the Sun one had to do multiple measurements, and because those measurements all fit a Gaussian model of error distribution, one possible guess would be to compute the number of bosons that reach Earth as the probably that of a certain number of bosons to be found on Earth when one considers the Earth to be a certain number of standard deviations from the Sun, considering one standard deviation as the radius of the Sun. This type of an estimate seems plausible to me, considering the fact that in order to find how many atoms the Sun contains, one had to do measurements that align themselves theoretically on a Gaussian distribution.

1:49 ahhhhhhhhh yes the good old Uranus joke never gets olt😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

What you got against cats bro?

How does gravity exist with everything? It just is?

I came here to learn why magnets are the way they are and left with a question: Why do particles have electric charges? 😅

Im very sad abot i live in Europe, bc of that i almost never can see solar eclipses and im too young too leave on my own or earn money but i hope in future that ill get that chance to see it 😁

It's called a toroidal field. Your donut describes it best. A field of energy that rolls along the frame of the donut and back into a central point. Earth has it. The sun has it. Human bodies have it. Dolphins have it. It's the same for every living creature as well as most things that can produce any electromagnetism at all. If you cannot conceptually imagine it I cannot help. To me this sort if field would be like an hour glass where the sand flows as energy through the wall layer and back into that finite point that usually only allows a single grain of sand. The compression and oscillation of energy through this finite point into the size of a single particle is the same concept in my eyes.

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique KZfaq video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 852.

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique KZfaq video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 851.

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique KZfaq video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 849.

Mis guides

The thing is that the accused can't we give to the owners, the actual mistake is of the actress and actor. I think forcefully a man or woman cannot do that. Information is right but allegations is wrong. Watch everything, do whatever is needed. Be like players who play in the ground not in the bed. Sex Education only can be get in the form of porn.

Bottom line: WINDMILLS DON'T CAUSE CANCER.

coz of the black walls

The library has shelves of physics books on the nature of matter and energy and none of them have the full picture. With three letters Einstein nailed it probably the most far reaching and profound formula to come from a human mind

There is another way to imagine gravity. Everything moves at the speed of light through 4-dimensional space-time. Again: Everything moves. At the Speed of light. Always. Through 4D space time. You travel at lightspeed through spacetime right now! This speed is always CONSTANT for everything. Always. Lightspeed ist not the maximum speed, it is a CONSTANT for everything. A stone at rest can travel through time at the speed of light, but stand still in space. Or travel through space very quickly, but slowly through time. And so on. So, what is gravity now? Every mass generates a field that slows down time around it. An object now approaches this mass. Due to the field, its time now slows down. It now travels more slowly through time. Ok, but as said, the speed through space time HAS to be constant! Well, because the object still has to travel at the speed of light through space time, another vector is added to ensure that the speed remains constant. It doesn't go straight anymore. It falls. We always explain time dilation with gravity. But it also works the other way around: time dilation causes gravity.

1:27 Schrodinger's grandfather

our observation or even our existence is an illusion.

Such an important equation from something so seemly simply

The biggest question I have with the prisoner of Azkaban version of time travel presented here is, what if you refuse. What if, when you get to the point where you comprehend that all this time travelling has happened before, you just simply refused to close the loop. Say out of spite. What then.

Attosecond spectroscopy debunked the Heisenberg uncertainty principle Attosecond spectroscopy was used to observe the motion of the electron-electrodynamics- 3 scientists won the Nobel Prize in 2023

Oh, boy... who came up with this nonsense? :-)

Dang, I actually thought about this years back and drew it in MS paint, but I never posted anything about it on the internet. Now seeing this video, I feel like I missed an opportunity to make a cool video about portals.

The question is based on a false assumption. If we live in a materialistic worldview and we're just atoms, then the question doesn't make sense cause in materialism there is no *You.* There is no personhood, there is just a physical being with no distinct soul. So when "You" get teleported, it's actually only the atoms that get teleported, but not *You* because there is no *You* to begin with.

How is Brian Cox 56 years old? Explain that to me!

Tellurium is also named after Earth, and Selenium after Luna. Helium is after the sun too. Also while Titanium isn't directly named after Titan, it's still a thing. Also according to wikipedia, a polish chemist claimed to isolate element 44 and named it after Vesta, though he later retracted that claim and when it was actually isolated it was named Ruthenium instead

Jesus. I feel like these smart people are just fucking with the rest of us

Amaltheas solar eclipse is like an eye

3 minuts was literaly like 30 s

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique KZfaq video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 823.

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique KZfaq video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 822. If you were separate from the ground, you would move several miles every time you jump.

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique KZfaq video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 818.

I am commenting #BringBackDislikes on every unique KZfaq video that I watch for the rest of 2024, regardless of if I actually dislike the video or not. This is video 815.

Yes ( No one knows ). Why wouldn’t there be equal amounts? Let me hypothesize at the singularity of forces +&- balance like a proton and a electron.

hydrogen has also "half" of electron or orbits.

Always took it as a given and never understood much how, but two's complement makes so much more sense now.