There are plenty of kits with clear stickers but they must be applied perfectly and all air bubbles scraped out to not appear discolored, the colored stickers actually minimize this issue and are only noticable up-close.

Clear stickers aren't a cost savings. Clear substrate is more expensive than white. Clear also requires an extra color to print, white.

@@zeroman614 I figured there had to be some downsides otherwise LEGO would definitely make everything clear

I think I would be better if they just printed on the lego pieces instead of using stickers and for some sets they could use actual lego pieces for the headlights and taillights

Clear stickers also allow one to change the base color of the vehicle.

If only the other themes had the quality of speed champions

I think lego should do an speed champions line with the 6 stud cars dedicated to younger people. I really liked the details they brought with the 6 stud cars so maybe bringimg all of this back in a approach to younger audicences would be an cool idea.

you bri'ish mate?

im mixed, for one i agree since they definitely need to focus more on the cars... but i do miss the 6 stud wide cars having extra stuff, the perfect solution was like the 2020 cars that had the simpler finish lines... that wouldve been great but they didnt do it sadly i do have the huracan/urus set wich is good since i sorta can use that set's finish line for others but it would still be cool if it was like before

It's like you live in my head!

Agree, I am collector and I will keep my cars build in order to display as a collection not to reuse the tiles and blocks.

This is why the Lamborghini was great when it comes for examples of licensed Technic sets, no stickers, few printed parts and any that are are fairly small

Hell yeah the GT3 is a better looking model also has the aston martin front grill which is the part of the design since forever.

Rumors... I will get excited if it is confirmed :)

@@RacingBrick the site where it's coming from is usually right :) another set they are listing there is the F&F Dodge Charger, but I think a classic Aston is way more exciting.

Nah, it's just that the chassis of the lego valkryie itself is way too long it seems. Tho yes the AMR Pro version of the Valkyrie is significantly longer than the Vantage GT3 by around 11-14 inches, the valkyrie seems super wide itself.

Thanks, Aston Martin's webpage does not give too much up to date information about these cars

I suggest to reach out to LEGO customer service with the issue

Transparent works on white but not sure how it would look on lime

@EVAN CHEN WEI KAI I know, I just really dislike the lime and red combo

I know, I have the Vespa & I'll do the usual review, not sure though when it will be finished

The Countach, of course :)

I noticed the same, it’s already on back order on the Lego website, obviously the most sought after of the sets

Yes and possibly an off road ones two!!!

yeah this is the only double set so far where both the cars look pretty equal.

They should’ve used the plastic wheel covers and printed the red stripe on it, would make it so much better

They should’ve given it the butterfly doors too 🤩

Yeah I don’t think it’s very well proportioned

I have no idea how wide the real car is :)

Mostly less than a week

I liie the f1 set more but ur decision

I bought the f1

I have same question

It has the same height as other cockpit pieces, you can't really make these lower

Ur one of the only people who ive heard say that, who doesn't love F1?

@EVAN CHEN WEI KAI sure, but Lego version made it look way longer than it should be.

No worries man, but I guess you have a very hard time finding car or tech reviews online ;) And please explain the others who think that I'm to strict and derogatory with certain sets that according to your theory I'm actually still way nicer than I'm supposed to be :)

@@RacingBrick I usually get my LEGO news and reviews from JANGBRICKS. He personally pays for all the sets he reviews so I feel I get an honest review from him. He doesn't need to worry about what his handlers have to say. LEGO is not his gravy train. As for those other people you talk about, I couldn't give two 💩about what those people have to say.

@@kevinpeterson1398 Jang is a great guy, if you trust him then I suggest to keep watching his videos. But since you spared a few minutes of your life sharing your thoughts here, I will share mine. LEGO sends me some sets for review, I buy some others. Believe it or not, the source of the set does not influence my opinion. I will tell if I like it, I will also tell if I don't like it. Why do I have more positive reviews than negative ones? Because I won't waste my time on stuff that I know I won't like by default. I could review all Super Mario sets and keep bashing them, but after one I simply accepted that it's not for me. Same for Minecraft, Ninjago and so on. But if LEGO releases yet another lame 18+ Technic set with minimal functions, then I will 100% review that and I won't be nice for sure. Anyway, since you don't trust me, let's follow your way of thinking. As you said I must be doing nice reviews because I want to please LEGO. Jang pays for his sets from his KZfaq revenue, so I guess in this case for maximum profit he must be making videos that will surely please his viewers, right? But is he really honest, or maybe he only says things what you want to hear? If anyone was wondering, the last part was sarcasm. Just to be on the safe side :)

?