真，愛理不理啲人，白鴿眼到一個點

Flat out 試既話病需要既話可問我借車

捱唔捱到5年先講😭

感覺冇咁熱

用電子倒後鏡架

咁耐玩到變長短洲😂

去左kia摸過架車,Kia ev6個籠膠到暈,張凳話真皮原來得條邊,冇head up display, 如果40萬可以接受,50萬既車冇理由cheap到咁,kia好似當咗自己同bba同級

韓粉會覺得hyundai, kia 已經同bba同級

多謝😂😂😂

No la, 90%有320KM

😂應該無

會唔會比亞迪似深圳的士多D?深圳的士就係byd 喎😂

呢個係值得Concern嘅位嚟㗎

論brand，點會拎泡菜車擺埋一齊睇😂😂

@@heikei1236 打手sales 既野不言而喻

去左kia摸過架車,Kia ev6個籠膠到暈,張凳話真皮原來得條邊,冇head up display, 如果40萬可以接受,50萬既車冇理由cheap到咁,kia好似當咗自己同bba同級

男Karen 👍

同問

@@CyanHorizon 火石道

九龍塘maryknoll

60幾買個日本牌子， 俾長輩鬧死，呢個水位 benz bmw 任君選擇。 即係日本錶安份守紀做返d quartz 錶， 唔好大想頭整國產mechanical 芯，grand seiko 永遠去唔到rolex

​​​@@marktong77objectively speaking, I disagree. Albeit RZ 個 range 真係唔 impressive, in particularly for people like us, 我哋真係要 long range. 但係 over a lot of 其他方面, 唔係 on par amongst Europeans, 係 exceeded, specifically on reliability side of things, 呢個對大部分 user around the world 都係 paramount, as we do drive a lot and counting on that. 你用既 Rolex - grand Seiko analogy imho 亦唔 appropriate. 只要你要真係1個 watch person, know how it happened during research, development, production rather than 只係 brand value 勝於1切嘅人, 你1定會 agree grand Seiko is so much better than 呢個 R brand. ..... and I am speaking of experience here, lexus, mercedes, BMW's...grand Seikos, rolexes... 我都有 vast amount of experience. 嘗試 be open minded try 下, 你會有唔同既體會 🫱🏻‍🫲🏼

@@ricchrono5907 you are straight up clown for assuming I ain't open-minded. Tech of seiko doesn't translate to brand premium. At the end of the day, if you look at researches and statistics, only the three swiss brands, Rolex, AP and PP time pieces have the best retention of value. In the case of Rolex, in the span of deacdes, Rolex can reach annual yield of close to forgot what percent, matching performance of s&p 500 in the same time span. Japanese brands? Not even close. Look, the brand premium of these so called jap luxury brands can't even match that of their European counterparts. Which car would a gold digger be sticking her ass to? A Ferrari or a Lexus ? Thats life. You are being delusional. Jap did make some nice machines like LFA and NSX. Other than those, what they got? Regarding the technology aspect, quartz is reliable and much more accurate than mechanical and swiss automatics. Time is free, but at the end of the day, your japanese brands don't have that brand premium to sell at the tier of Rolex. Be it reliable, low-maintenance, it doesn't matter. You are not getting annual yield matching s&p 500 with a reliable and widely available technology. Don't get me wrong. Japs are good in tyres and metal manufacturing. You realize that the F1 use enkeii wheels and bridgetsone tyres? They are the top of the line in the manufacturing processes . All I was saying is that these japanese auto brands are delusional in setting their price tags like that. Selling at a high price tag doesn't make your machines into the upper enchelon. And you gotta know your role. If you ain't a superstar on the floor, you are not getting most of the shots and better stay at the corner three or be cheerleader at the sideline. You cant be a good pornstar with a three-incher weenie. And I personally favor japanese cars for their reliability and their functionality. I can't speak the following in English. 揸住架type r 喺旺角朗豪坊洪洪洪， 大聲播住張敬軒醉愛， 叼著一口煙，揈個靚彎去亞皆老街，響住喉咁， 然後行多兩步就係奧運對出橋底俾差佬block截， 仲因為條直出喉，同大尾翼，被阿Sir tow 返去驗。 呢啲先係日本車嘅角色， 呢啲先係揸日本車應有嘅相符嘅生活態度， 嗰個過氣老飛係邊個？ 咪我囉。 你當我睇唔起日本車？ 你真係on 撚鳩 Market value is everything here, because it represents how most people perceive a product's worth. It's your own thing to worship a technological advances of a product. But you are not buying every single inventory out there. Cars gotta appeal to the public.

ricchrono5907 言之有理，戴精工不是窮到濃，火柴頭只是手緊之時係有用！😂

@@tonyho2586 呢個都唔係重點。 李嘉誠都戴精工，又reliable cp值又高， 但如果隻精工賣到十幾萬gmt咁樣， 就唔會有市場。 車廠要賣車，錶廠都要賣錶

係。😊

皇冠唔賺香港人 點對得住自己😂

If this is 割香港9菜, then 已經割左29幾年. Without a doubt 呢幾年响多層都係擺明搶香港錢, 不過車價就從來都係咁, roads in HK can't afford having too many cars.

哩個系官方指導價，落地價有好多優惠。無辦法，香港無蔚來，小鵬，理想，極氪等等競爭對手，日本歐洲電車在香港還是吃香的

rz300e标准版优惠落地28万rmb左右，不过台车真系槽点太多，官方价36.99起嘅车标准版连电动座椅都无真系无法接受